Unit One
Unit One
Unit One
Human Rights are Essential and Necessary - In the absence of human rights, the moral,
physical, social and spiritual welfare of an individual is impossible. Human rights are also
essential as they provide suitable conditions for material and moral upliftment of the people.
Human Rights are in connection with human dignity - To treat another individual with
dignity irrespective of the fact that the person is a male or female, rich or poor etc. is concerned
with human dignity. For eg. In 1993, India has enacted a law that forbids the practice of carrying
human excreta. This law is called Employment of Manual Scavengers and Dry Latrines
(Prohibition) Act.
Human Rights are Irrevocable: Human rights are irrevocable. They cannot be taken away by
any power or authority because these rights originate with the social nature of man in the society
of human beings and they belong to a person simply because he is a human being. As such
human rights have similarities to moral rights.
Human Rights are Necessary for the fulfillment of purpose of life: Human life has a purpose.
The term ―human right‖ is applied to those conditions which are essential for the fulfillment of
this purpose. No government has the power to curtail or take away the rights which are
sacrosanct, inviolable and immutable.
Human Rights are Universal – Human rights are not a monopoly of any privileged class of
people. Human rights are universal in nature, without consideration and without exception. The
values such as divinity, dignity and equality which form the basis of these rights are inherent in
human nature.
Human Rights are never absolute – Man is a social animal and he lives in a civic society, which
always put certain restrictions on the enjoyment of his rights and freedoms. Human rights as such
are those limited powers or claims, which are contributory to the common good and which are
recognized and guaranteed by the State, through its laws to the individuals. As such each right
has certain limitations.
Human Rights are Dynamic - Human rights are not static, they are dynamic. Human rights go
on expanding with socio-eco-cultural and political developments within the State. Judges have to
interpret laws in such ways as are in tune with the changed social values. For eg. The right to be
cared for in sickness has now been extended to include free medical treatment in public hospitals
under the Public Health Scheme, free medical examinations in schools, and the provisions for
especially equipped schools for the physically handicapped.
Rights as limits to state power - Human rights imply that every individual has legitimate claims
upon his or her society for certain freedom and benefits. So human rights limit the state‘s power.
These may be in the form of negative restrictions, on the powers of the State, from violating the
inalienable freedoms of the individuals, or in the nature of demands on the State, i.e. positive
obligations of the State. For eg. Six freedoms that are enumerated under the right to liberty forbid
the State from interfering with the individual.
5: Human rights give people the freedom to practice their religion (or not practice any)
Religious violence and oppression occur over and over again all across history, from the
Crusades to the Holocaust to modern terrorism in the name of religion. Human rights
acknowledge the importance of a person‘s religion and spiritual beliefs, and let them practice
in peace. The freedom to not hold to a religion is also a human right.
The twentieth century witnessed the crystallization of the philosophy of Human Rights when the
United Nations adopted the UN Charter, 1945, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
1948 and the International Covenants on Human Rights with further emphasis to protection of
rights of Women, Abolition of Slavery, Racial Discrimination, Civil and Political Rights,
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and most importantly the Rights of children.
In India the drafters of Constitution took care to incorporate Human Rights for its own citizens as
well as for the aliens.
The important landmarks in the progress of human rights are as follows:
The Magna Carta, 1215.
The Magna Carta, also known as the Great Charter, of 1215 is the most significant
constitutional document of all human history. The main theme of it was protection against
the arbitrary acts by the king. The 63 clauses of the Charter guaranteed basic civic and legal
rights to citizens, and protected the barons from unjust taxes. The English Church too
gained freedom from royal interferences. King John of England granted the Magna Carta to
the English barons on 15th June 1215. The king was compelled to grant the Charter,
because the barons refused to pay heavy taxes unless the king signed the Charter.
The English Bill of Rights, 1689.
The next source and avenue of the development of the philosophy of human rights is the
English Bill of Rights, enacted on December 16, 1689, by the British Parliament. The
British Parliament declared its supremacy over the Crown in clear terms. The English Bill
of Rights declared that the king has no overriding authority. The Bill of Rights codified the
customary laws, and clarified the rights and liberties of the citizens.
It lays down the twin foundations, viz., the supremacy of the law, and the sovereignty of
the nation, upon which, the English constitution rests.
American Declaration of Independence, 1776.
The first colonies to revolt against England were the thirteen States of America. These
states declared their independence from their mother country on 4th July 1776. The
declaration charges the king with tyranny and affirms the independence of the American
colonies. The declaration of independence has great significance in the history of mankind
as it justified the right to revolt against a government that no longer guaranteed the man‘s
natural and inalienable rights.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, 1791.
The U.S. Constitution was enacted on 17th September 1787. The most conspicuous defect
of the original constitution was the omission of a Bill of Rights concerning private rights
and personal liberties. Madison, therefore proposed as many as twelve amendments in the
form of Bill of Rights. Ten of these were ratified by the State legislatures. These ten
constitutional amendments came to be known as the Bill of Rights. The overall theme of the
Bill of Rights is that the citizen be protected against the abuse of power by the officials of
the States.
The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 1789
The fall of Bastille and the abolition of feudalism, serfdom and class privileges by the
National Assembly ushered France into a new era. On 4th August 1789, the National
Assembly proclaimed the Rights of Man and of the Citizens. The Rights were formulated
in 17 Articles.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen has far reaching importance not
only in the history of France but also in the history of Europe and mankind. The declaration
served as the death warrant for the old regime and introduced a new social and political
order, founded on the noble and glittering principles. Further the declaration served as the
basis for many Constitutions, framed in different countries, where the framers gave top
priority to human rights.
Declaration of International Rights of Man, 1929.
After World War I, questions about human rights and fundamental freedoms began to be
raised. In 1929, the Institute of International Law adopted the Declaration of International
rights of Man. The Declaration declared that fundamental rights of citizen, recognized and
guaranteed by several domestic constitutions, especially those of the French and the U.S.A
constitutions, were in reality meant not only for citizens of the states but for all men all
over the world, without any consideration.
Even though the declaration isn‘t binding or enforceable. It would serve as a model for
legislation in many countries.
After the draft was presented to the United Nations General Assembly, it was adopted on
December 10, 1946.
December 10, the anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration, is celebrated
annually as World Human Rights Day or International Human Rights Day.
Structure of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The structure of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was influenced by a set of laws
formulated by Napoléon Bonaparte centuries before, collectively known as the Code
Napoléon.
Its final structure took form in the second draft prepared by French jurist René Cassin, who
worked on the initial draft prepared by Canadian legal scholar John Peters Humphrey.
The Declaration consists of the following:
The preamble gives details about the social and historical reasons that led to the formation of
the UDHR.
It contains a total of 30 articles:
Articles 1 – 2 -The basic concepts of dignity, liberty and equality are established.
Articles 3 – 5 -Details of individual rights, such as the right to life and prohibition of slavery
are explained in detail.
Articles 6 – 11 -Refers to the fundamental rights as well as the remedies for their
violation.
Articles 12 – 17- Set forth the rights of the individual towards the community, including
freedom of movement and residence within each state, the right of property and the right to a
nationality.
Articles 18 – 21- These sets of articles refer to the rights of the individual towards the
community, including freedom of movement, thought, opinion, expression, religion, peaceful
association and ideas through any media.
Articles 22 – 27- Sanctions an individual‘s economic, social and cultural rights including
healthcare. It also upholds the right to a better standard of living and makes a special mention
of care given to motherhood or childhood.
Articles 28 – 30- It establishes the general means of exercising these rights, the areas in
which the rights of the individual cannot be applied.
The UDHR is widely regarded as a ground breaking document that provides a comprehensive
and universal set of principles in a secular, apolitical document that is beyond cultural,
religious and political ideologies The Declaration was the first instrument of international law
to use the phrase ―rule of law‖, thereby establishing the principle that all members of all
societies are equally bound by the law regardless of the jurisdiction or political system.
In International law, a declaration is different from a treaty in the sense that it generally states
aspiration or understanding among the parties, rather than binding obligations. For this
reason, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a fundamental constitutive document of
the United Nations and, by extension, all 193 parties of the UN Charter.
International Covenants
United Nations (UN) on December 16, 1966 adopted two covenants in its Resolution 2200 A
(XXI): The International Covenant on Civil and Political rights (ICCPR ) and the
International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), these were made
in pursuance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Post the 1948
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it gave the work to a committee to prepare a
Covenant for the enforcement of such rights. This also led to debates between the capitalist
and communist states, with countries such as the USA pressing the need for Liberty Rights,
whereas other communist states insisting on economic, social and cultural rights. The
deadlock in the interests between these led the UN to direct the committee to make two
different Covenants.
1. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights
The ICESCR is a multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 16
December 1966 as part of the larger resolution on Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It
aspires to provide non-self-governing and trust territories and individuals, labour rights, right
to health, right to education and the right to an adequate standard of living.
2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
The ICCPR is a multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations on December 16, 1966, and
came into force on March 23, 1976. The Covenant commits parties to respect the civil and
political rights of individuals, which includes, right to freedom of speech and expression,
right to freedom of religion, Freedom of assembly, electoral rights, due process and a fair
trial.
Objective
The international human rights movement was strengthened when the United Nations General
Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948; this combined with
the ICCPR and the ICESCR form the International Bill of Human Rights. The major
objective of these Covenants is to ensure that each person is guaranteed these rights without
any discrimination.
Human rights protect human beings and their dignity in war and in peacetime. These rights
are protected under international law and it is the duty of states to ensure they are respected,
protected and fulfilled. To this end, the United Nations has developed a body of binding
conventions, all stemming from the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
There are basically three distinct types of human rights:
civil and political rights, e.g. the right to life, peaceful assembly and religious freedom
economic, social and cultural rights, e.g. the right to work, to education, and to social
security
rights of the third generation, e.g. the right to development and to a clean and healthy
environment
United Nations Conventions
UN Covenant I
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) covers
human rights in the economic, social and cultural spheres.
UN Covenant II
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) contains important
guarantees for the protection of civil and political rights.
Racial discrimination
The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
(ICERD) is explicitly directed at discrimination based on race, colour, descent, as well as
national and ethnic origin.
Torture
The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CAT) obliges the states parties to prevent and punish acts of torture.
Enforced disappearance
The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
(CPED) aims to punish and combat the grave human rights violation of enforced
disappearance.
Not only that, but women and children in particular are marginalized in numerous ways,
the press is not free in many countries, and dissenters are silenced, too often permanently.
While some gains have been made over the course of the last six decades, human
rights violations still plague the world today.
When there is a disagreement between people or groups within a society, the second form of
violation occurs: the state‘s failure to protect individuals from human rights violations. The
state is complicit in the abuses if it does nothing to intervene and safeguard vulnerable
persons and groups. When lynchings happened often across the United States, the state was
unsuccessful in protecting black Americans. Because many of those involved in the lynchings
were also state actors (such as the police), this acts as an example of two sorts of breaches
occurring simultaneously.
Land availability
The majority of Dalit abuse victims in India are landless agricultural labourers, who
constitute the backbone of our country‘s agrarian economy. Despite decades of land reform
laws, more than 86% of Dalit households are landless or near landless today. Landowners
frequently possess very little. In rural places, land is the most valuable possession that affects
a person‘s level of life and social standing. Lack of access to land renders Dalits
economically vulnerable and majorly dependent on upper and middle castes for monetary
assistance. Subsequently, their dependence is abused by upper and middle caste landlords,
allowing many crimes, like begar, to go unpunished.
Hindu-Muslim conflicts
History has put the greatest shadow over Hindu-Muslim relations of all the religious and
ethnic conflicts in modern India. The partition of 1947 was the most crucial contemporary
period in this history. Despite the fact that a Muslim sovereign state of Pakistan was founded
amid horrific communal strife, virtually as many Muslims remained in India for varying
motives. The division did not resolve the Hindu-Muslim conflict. Rather, it worsened the
status of Hindu-Muslim relations in India, causing perpetual tension to exist between the two
groups. Even 75 years after independence, the situation persists. Riots and conflicts between
Hindus and Muslims continue to take place across the nation.
The right to freely express one‘s thoughts by words, writing, printing, photographs, or any
other methods is known as freedom of speech and expression. In recent years, it has become
commonly understood that the right to free expression lies at the heart of a free society and
must be safeguarded continually. The uninterrupted flow of speech through an open medium
is the primary principle of a free society. The freedom to communicate one‘s thoughts and
beliefs without impediment, and especially without fear of punishment, is crucial to the
growth of a community and, eventually, a state. It is one of the most basic fundamental rights
protected from government restriction or control.
In India, Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and
expression to all citizens of India. It consists of the freedom of the press, the right to silence,
the right to report and broadcast, as well as the right to be informed. It is a qualified right and
is subject to certain restrictions to ensure it doesn‘t violate others‘ fundamental rights or the
security of the state. Freedom of speech can be curbed to the extent that it does not adversely
impact the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, maintenance of friendly
relations with foreign states, decency and morality, or cause a contempt of court or
defamation. It is essential to protect and uphold these rights to improve the democratic
structure of our country and improve the accountability of the state actors. In case the right to
free speech and expression is curbed without any reasonable explanation, it may cause
repression of constructive criticism and the establishment of an autocratic government.
Even though they have the same qualifications and work the same hours, women are paid less
than males.
Women are divided into low-paying jobs, and women‘s occupations are low-paying.
Teaching, child care, nursing, cleaning, and waitressing are examples of ―pink-collar‖
employment that often pays less than positions in male-dominated sectors.
Unpaid caring takes up more time for women than it does for men. Women are more likely
than males to look after children, the elderly, or handicapped members of their families.
Women are more likely to shoulder the burden of child-rearing expenses. When parents do
not live together, women are more likely to shoulder the financial burden of raising children.
Pregnancy has a greater impact on women‘s employment and educational chances than on
men‘s. The financial costs of pregnancy are higher for women than they are for males.
Unplanned and mistimed pregnancies, in particular, can cause women to lose their education
and prevent them from obtaining and maintaining stable jobs.
Domestic and sexual abuse can lead to poverty for women. Domestic or sexual violence can
result in the loss of a career, declining health, and homelessness. Many Indian women,
particularly those from low-income families, are victims of intimate partner violence
perpetrated by current or previous spouses or love interests. Poverty and gender inequality are
thus mutually reinforcing in terms of infringing on women‘s legal rights.
Violation of child rights
Across a majority of nations, a proportion of the total children end up being denied their
rights, especially the girl child. Millions of children throughout the world are being held back
by a range of hurdles that prevent them from fulfilling their full potential, from a lack of
access to school to security and safety to safe water and basic sanitation. The UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) has been ratified by over 190 nations, making it the
most widely-adopted human rights convention in history. However, just because the treaty
exists does not guarantee that children‘s rights are always respected. The following are some
infringements of child rights that take place across the world:
Child marriages
Girls‘ rights are violated by child marriage, which often forces them to drop out of school,
exposes them to abuse (sexual, physical, and emotional), and forces them into situations that
their young minds and bodies are not ready for, such as childbirth. Although young boys get
married off early as well, child marriage is a problem that disproportionately affects girls. The
lockdown caused an increased surge in child marriages across regions in India, making it a
major national concern.
Child labour
Millions of children in the world‘s poorest countries work in dangerous and exploitative
conditions that are harmful to their health and growth. Sex trafficking, domestic slavery,
harsh physical labour such as mining or farming, and factory labour are all types of child
labour.
Child soldiers
Separated from their families, displaced from their homes, or living in conflict zones with
restricted access to schooling makes children more vulnerable to recruitment by armed forces
and groups. These children are subjected to the horrors of war, a situation that not only
deprives them of their innocent childhood experiences but also has negative consequences on
their mental and emotional development. Every kid has the right to be shielded from the
effects of conflict.
These fundamental rights apply to everyone regardless of gender, age, economic or social
status and opinions. Human rights are universal and ubiquitous because of this. Tolerance,
equality, and respect are values that can assist lessen societal conflict. Putting human rights
ideals into practice can assist us in creating the society we desire. The way we think about
and implement human rights principles has changed dramatically in recent decades. This has
had several good outcomes: human rights education may empower individuals and provide
answers to specific challenges. Human rights are fundamental to how individuals engage with
one another at all levels of society, including the family, community, schools, employment,
politics, and international relations. Thus, it is critical that everyone attempt to grasp what
human rights are. It is simpler for people to support justice and equality in society when they
have a greater understanding of human rights.