Research - Daisy
Research - Daisy
Research - Daisy
Most parents assumed that their children could not be educated merely on the
school environment and that home environment would have a lasting impact on
school education. Therefore, many parents recognize the importance of school and
home collaboration in educating their children. Findings of research done on the
influence of parental involvement in the academic performance of the children shows
that there is a significant relationship between the parental involvement and the
student performance of the children (Yaseen, Zaman and Rasheed, 2017,
Ambachew, Amare and Geleta, 2018, Simweleba & Serpell, 2020). However,
parents’ active involvement is more influential with students’ performance than the
other socioeconomic factors. While parental involvement is important at every grade
level, it is critical at the secondary school stage because parents of young
adolescents have a tendency to become less actively involved in their children’s
reach upper secondary stage in their education (Oates, 2017). Moreover, the
existing researches have revealed the importance of parental involvement towards
student performance. Mutodi and Ngirande (2014) argues Three parental
involvement constructs, that is, parenting, parent –teacher communication and home
and family support were found to be positively related to performance. Studies
conclude that the home and family support is the most significant factor that
determines a learner’s performance. The parents who involve themselves in the
children’s education at home, their children as a result, show good performance at
school. Akbar, Chisthi & Younes, (2017) stated that the Parental involvement is
found statistically significantly contributing towards the outcome of Student
Performance. The study helps us to accept that there is a relationship between
parental involvement and their children’s academic achievement. Furthermore,
studies carried out by Hussain, Javaid, Parveen & Iqbal (2018) and Ambachew,
Amare, & Geleta (2018) revealed that there is a strong positive and significant
relationship between parental involvement and academic performance of students.
Similarly, studies carried out Akbar (2015);, Topor et al., (2010) reviles that Parental
involvement (PI) is found to be statistically significantly contributing towards the
outcome of Students’ scores. Research studies carried out by Jaiswal and
Choudhuri (2017) suggests that when parents are actively involved in their children’s
educational activities, show affection to their children, participate in school events,
democratic and responsive in nature, and keep positive educational expectation then
students’ academic performance becomes higher. Based on Parka and Holloway
(2017) studies, stated that the effects of school-based parental involvement on
academic achievement at the child achievement in mathematics significant. Parental
involvement became more strongly related to mathematics and reading achievement
as children move through the grades. Providing information on how schools function,
how to support learning, and how to access educational resources is another way to
encourage parents to become more involved in school-based activities (Park and
Holloway, 2013). Further, the studies confirm that parental involvement as the most
powerful predictor of, particularly for low socioeconomic families, is the creation of a
school environment where parents feel welcomed and valued by educators (Walker,
Hoover-Dempsey, & Sandler, 2007; Hoover-Dempsey, & Sandler, 1997; Park &
Holloway, 2013; Baquedano-Lopez, Alexander, & Hernandez, 2013)
There are various studies which provide empirical evidence on the positive impacts
of the parental involvement and the student performance, in developing countries as
well. In a study carried out in Ghana by the researchers Amponsah, Milledzi, Ampofo
and Gyambrah (2018) reviled that there is a significant positive relationship between
parental involvement and students’ academic performance. Their findings revelries
that parental involvement through homework, creating a learning environment for
studying at home, motivating and setting realistic and high expectations for children
enhances academic performance. Hence, parents as the prime educators and the
first agents of socialization and exposing children to the social and academic world
should play a leading role in supporting their children’s education. Thus, for their
children’s educational attainment parents should set high and realistic expectations,
to motivate their children to perform well academically. By establishing and enforcing
the rules and regulations regarding school and home activities as well as providing
opportunities and environment conducive for learning parents should also ensure
home supervision. Schools should encourage Parent-Teacher Association (PTA)
sessions to be conducted to educate and assist parents to develop better parenting
skills (Amponsah, Milledzi, Ampofo and Gyambrah, 2018). Another study carried out
in Ethiopia, Ambachew, Amare, and Geleta, (2018) argue that there is a strong
relationship between parental involvement and academic performance. Furthermore,
it significantly predicts student academic achievement motivation. On the other hand,
pointed out that there is limited study on the relationship between parental
involvement and academic achievement of secondary school students as majority of
the research in this area has been conducted exclusively with elementary school
students (Simweleba & Serpell, 2020). Parents should devote their time, effort,
resources on their children’s schooling to enhance their academic performance.
They should actively participate on their children’s schooling. Spend more time with
their children, pay attention and follow up with their children to complete
assignments, homework, note books and by providing rewards to motivate them,
discuss on school activities, expectations of academic achievement, and the
importance of achieving good results (Assefa and Sintayehu, 2019; Grolnick, 2014).
Another study has shown that the level of parental involvement focused on four main
aspects as learning environment at home, social interaction with child,
communication with child and support towards child excellence. Thereby, parents
realize the importance and take action in providing an appropriate learning
environment for children such as providing study area and reference books, have a
conversation with the child, enquire child’s activities and discuss their problems.
Thus, concludes as there is positive relationship between parental involvement and
students’ performance (Ahmad et al., 2017). Research carried out by White (2017)
indicated there are benefits of parental involvement (Fan et al. 2012; Green et al.,
2007; Williams & Bryan, 2013) that can positively influence student performance.
Mahuro and Hungi (2016) adopt two of the six types of parental involvement
presented in the Epstein parental involvement model, parenting and communication
with the school. They conclude as these types of involvement have contributed to
their children an advantage towards academic achievement. However, some of the
previous studies on the relationship between parental involvement and student
performance have delivered mixed and weak findings. Several studies have shown
that parental involvement in children’s academic education tends to decrease across
schooling, moreover parental involvement changes throughout school (Jeynes,
2011; Costa and Faria, 2017; Wijsman et al., 2018). On the other hand, father-child
attachments were uniquely predictive of children’s positive and negative school
outcomes Holmes and Huston, 2010), although predictive relations varied depending
of the specific outcomes. Fathers’ school-based, but not home-based, involvement
was significantly and uniquely predictive of children’s negative attitudes towards
school (Fatherhood Institute, 2010; Flouri, 2006). Both home-based and school
based educational involvement were negatively related to school problems but
positively related to academic self-concept and school achievement, although
associations were weaker than expected (Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler, 2005; Walker
et al., 2009). In US, father educational involvement was related to fewer school
problems, greater knowledgeable/school status, and higher school achievement. In
the Taiwan, father involvement was inversely related to children’s school problems,
but not knowledgeable/school status or school achievement (Newland and Chen,
2013). Hill and Tyson’s analysis (2009) also found that school-based involvement
was consistently related to children’s school achievement, while home-based
involvement was not. While parental involvement has been found to be related to
increased academic performance, the mechanisms through which parental
involvement applies its impact on a student’s academic performance are not yet fully
understood (Collins, Juma and Murundu (2019). Today, the family structure is quite
different, one parent as the bread winner does not exists. With the new family setting
the financial demand today, many parents are not able to support their children’s
education when it comes to parental involvement (Burns, 2010). Therefore, it can be
said that the relationship among parental involvement and student academic
performance is questionable because of the inconsistent findings of studies related
to this relationship (Sulaimani & Henning, 2020). The inconsistent findings of the
parental involvement construct set difficult to arrive at any general conclusion. Some
research studies revealed a positive relationship between parental involvement and
student academic achievement (Barnard, 2004; Christenson et al., 1992; Singh et
al., 1995) and others reported no measurable to negative effect of parental
involvement on student academic achievement (Keith at al., 1986; Tokac &
Kacayoruk,2012). Moreover, Lam and Ducreux (2013), in turn, found no significant
association among parental help, monitoring and pressure and academic
achievements. There are a number of dimensions that are yet to be tested together
as the dimensions of parental involvement affecting the student performance. There
is a gap in knowledge relating to the parental involvement and student performance
(Juma, Muramdu, Colins, 2019). Thus, there is a need for research to explore further
on the relationship between parental involvement and student performance (Juma,
Muramdu, Colins, 2019; Sulaimani & Henning, 2020). Although there’s a declining
trend in parental involvement towards student performance as children proceed to
high school (Wijsman et al., 2018), it is still questionable because of the inconsistent
findings of studies related to this relationship. Thus, there is a need for research to
explore further (Sulaimani & Henning, 2020).
Over the years parenting styles and behaviors has evolved. The three
parenting styles namely authoritative, authoritarian and permissive (Baumrind, 1966,
1967, 1978, 1991) are used to determining academic success in literature from
western cultures (Masud et al., 2015 Pinquart, 2016; Checa et al., 2019). Evidence
from cultural similarities with Pakistan shows varied findings. A study from Iran
shows support for the authoritarian parenting style similar to Pakistan (Rahimpour et
al., 2015). Determining academic performance of students in the West and European
countries the authoritative parenting style is the dominant and most effective style
applied, while Asian counties show more favorable results for academic performance
for the authoritarian style (Masud et al., 2015). However, high parenting style of the
father adds a significant contribution to obtain higher academic grades by their
children. Thus, father’s role plays an important part in determining their children’s
academic outcome in Asian cultures (Masud et al., 2015). A number of studies have
been conducted on the relationship between parenting style and student academic
performance (Kösterelioğlu, 2018). Most scholars have found a positive impact of
parenting styles on student performance. Lerdponkulrat et al. (2012) reported
students who perceived their parents as authoritarian had higher performance.
Mahasneh (2014) reported positive relationships between parenting style and
academic success on authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and, the
authoritative parenting style is the best predictor of academic achievement.
According to Purificación C, Alicia (2018) and Orhan-Özen (2017) parenting style
has a positive effect on student performance. Jeynes (2010) indicated that parenting
style is an important component of parental involvement because it helped to
produce a positive home life for the child. The home-to-school relationship is
significant because it can expand and redefine the whole concept of parental
involvement (Seginer and Mahajna, 2018). Xu, Dai, Liu and Deng (2018) examined
how children at near adolescents’ age perceived parental psychological control and
autonomy based on their parenting style towards academic
achievement. Study carried out in Bhutan (Rabgay, 2015), found that there were
differences in students’ academic performance due to differences in parenting style.
It revealed that, out of the three parenting styles, namely authoritative, authoritarian
and permissive, found that authoritative parenting results in better students’
academic performance compared to students whose parents had an authoritarian
and permissive style of parenting. In the same way, Uma and Manikandan (2014)
noted that parents style plays a significant role in determining the level of academic
performance among adolescents. Thus, it is essential that parents should be
equipped with appropriate knowledge and skills so that they can provide better
guidance for their adolescents’ positive development especially in academic aspects.
CONCLUSION
26. De Silva, A. D. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. F., (2017). Do the demographic
differences manifest in motivation to learn science and impact on
science performance? Evidence from Sri Lanka. International Journal
of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21.
27. De Silva, A. D. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. F.,(2018). What factors affect
secondary students’ performance in science in the developing
countries? A conceptual model for an exploration. European Journal of
Education Studies, 4 (6), 80-100.
28. Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic
achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology
students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning
strategies. Higher Education, 59(3), 335-352.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8
29. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School and family connections: Theory, research
and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family.
Marriage and Family Review, 15, 99- 126.
30. Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships:
Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Philadelphia,
PA: Westview Press.
31. Erdoğan, B. (2013). The effect of adaptive learning management system
on student’s satisfaction, motivation and achievement in online
learning. Ankara University, Ankara.
32. Fan, W., & Williams, C.M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on
students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation.
Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental
Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53-74.
doi:10.1080/01443410903353302
33. Gafoor K. A., Kurukkan A., (2014) Construction and Validation of Scale of
Parenting Style.Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Science 2 (4),
315-323
34. Goni U., & Bello S., (2016). Parental socio-economic status, self-concept
and gender differenceson students’ academic performance in Borno
state colleges of education:
35. Grolnick W. S., (2014). Mothers’ motivation for involvement in their
children’s schooling: mechanisms and outcomes. Motiv Emot (2015)
39:63–73 DO I10.1007/s11031-014-9423-4
36. Guay, F., Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Vitaro, F. (2013). The
number of autonomy-supportive relationships: Are more relationships
better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement?
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 375–382.
37. Hafiz M. W. R., Tehsin F., Malik M. S., Saleem M., Khan M.A., (2013).
Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement; A Study on
Secondary School Students of Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal
of Humanities and Social Science (3) 8, 209-203.
38. Hamid M., Shakil A.M., Ali A.J., Ahmad J., (2016) Relationship between
parenting styles and academic performance of adolescents: mediating
role of self-efficacy. 17 (1), 121– 131
39. Hasan M., (2016) Correlates of Parental Support and Academic
Achievement of Male and Female Secondary School Students. The
International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN:
2349-3429 (p) Volume 3, Issue 2, No.7, DIP: 18.01.135/20160302
ISBN: 978-1-329-92551-9
40. Hayenga, A. O., & Corpus, J. H. (2010). Profiles of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivations: A person-centered approach to motivation and
achievement in middle school. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 371–
383.
41. Hill, N.E., & Tyson, D.F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school:
meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement.
Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763.
42. Hejazi E., (2018). The Mediation Role of Intrinsic Motivation in
Relationship Between Perceptions of Parenting Styles with Academic
Resilience, Research Gate.com
43. Holmes, E.K., & Huston, A.C. (2010). Understanding positive father-child
interaction: Children’s, fathers’, and mothers’ contributions. Fathering:
A Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice about Men as Fathers, 8(2),
203-225.
44. Jaiswal, S., Choudhuri, R. (2017). A Review of the Relationship between
Parental Involvement and Students ‗Academic Performance.
International Journal of Indian
Psychology, 4(3), 110-123.
45. Kapinga S., (2014). The impact of parental socio-economic status on
students’ Academic achievement in secondary schools in Tanzania.
International Journal of Education, 6 (4), 1948-5476.
46. Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., & Bickley, P. G. (1993). Does
parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement?
Structural analysis of national data.
School Psychology Review, 22, 474–496.
47. Kian, T., Yusoff, W., & Rajah, S. (2014). Motivation for generations’
cohorts: An organizational justice perspective. International Journal of
Management Sciences, 11(2), 536–542.
48. Kocayörük E., (2016). Parental Involvement and School Achievement.
International Journal of Human Behavioral Science. 2(2), 1-5.
49. Koca F.,(2016). Motivation to Learn and Teacher–Student Relationship.
Journal of International Education and Leadership. Volume 6 Issue 2
Summer 2016ISSN: 2161- 7252
50. Kösterelioğlu I., (2018). Effects of Parenting Style on Students’
Achievement Goal Orientation: A Studyon High School Students.
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, V 13,N 4, 91-107.
51. Lawrence A. and Barathi C. (2016), Parental Encouragement in Relation
to Academic Achievement of Higher Secondary School Students.
International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in
Education (2016). 2(6) 1234-1239
52. Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Understanding motivation
in
education: Theoretical and practical considerations. In Building autonomous
learners. Singapore: Springer.
53. Liu R. and Chiang Y. (2019) Who is more motivated to learn? The roles of
family background and teacher-student interaction in motivating
student learning. The Journal of Chinese Sociology. (6)6, 1-27
54. Masud H., Shakil A. M., Jan F.A., Jamil. F.A., (2016). Relationship
between parenting styles and academic performance of adolescents:
mediating role of self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Education Review,
10.1007/s12564-015-9413-6
55. Matejevic M., Jovanovic D. & Jovanovic M., (2014). Parenting style
involvement of parents in school activities and adolescents’ academic
achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 128 ( 2014 )
288 – 293
56. Masud S., Syed H M., Nada Q Q., Khan F., Khan S., Khan N M., (2019).
Academic Performance in Adolescent Students: The Role of Parenting
Styles and Socio Demographic Factors – A Cross Sectional Study
From Peshawar, Pakistan. Front. Psychol., Retrieved fro
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02497
57. Mutodi P. & Ngirande H., (2014). The Impact of Parental Involvement on
Student Performance: A Case Study of a South African Secondary
School. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing,
Rome-Italy, Vol 5 No 8 p 279-289
58. Mubeen S. & Reid N., (2014). The Measurement of Motivation with
Science Students. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL
RESEARCH Vol. 3, No. 3, 129-144
59. Newland, L.A., & Chen, H., (2013) Associations Among Father Beliefs,
Perceptions, Involvement, Child Attachment in the School outcome in
US and Taiwan, FATHERING, VOL. 11, NO. 1, WINTER 2013, p 3-30.
60. Orhan-Özen S., (2017) The Effect of Motivation on Student Achievement.
Springer International Publishing AG 2017E. Karadağ (ed.), The
Factors Effecting Student Achievement, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-
56083-0_3
61. Park, S., & Holloway, S. D. (2013). No parent left behind: Predicting
Parental involvement in adolescents’ education within a socio-
demographically diverse population. The Journal of Educational
Research, 106, 105–119.
62. Peiffer, G. (2015). The Effect of Self-efficacy on Parental Involvement at
the Secondary School Level. Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Pittsburgh.
63. Purification C, Alicia A-G. Parenting Styles, Academic Achievement and
the Influence of Culture. Psychol Psych another Res Stud.1(4).
PPRS.000518.2018. DOI: 10.31031/PPRS.2018.01.000518
64. Nejla G., Ceren O. and Hasan E, (2017). Investigation Number Sense
Test Achievements
of Middle School Students According to Different Variables. American Journal
of Educational Research, 5(9): 1004-1008. doi: 10.12691/education-5-
9-13.
65. Rabgay T., (2015). A Study of Factors Influencing Students’ Academic
Performance in a Higher Secondary School in Bhutan. Rabsel - the
CERD Educational Journal. Vol. 16, Issue - 2,pp 74-94
66. Ruholt R, Gore J., Dukes K. (2015). Is Parental Support or Parental
Involvement More Important for Adolescents? Eastern Kentucky
University(2015), 28 (1).
67. Saifi, S. & Mehmood, T. (2011). Effects of socioeconomic status on
student’s achievement. 68. Şen, M. (2006). Effects of English lessons,
based on multiple intelligence theory, on students ‘motivation, self-
efficacy, self-esteem and multiple intelligences (Unpublished Master
dissertation).Ankara University, Ankara.
69. Singh, K., Bickley, P, Trivette, P., Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., & Anderson, E.
(1995). The effects of four components of parental involvement on
eighth grade student achievement: Structural analysis of NELS-88
data. School Psychology Review, 24, 299–317.
70. Steinmayr, R., Meißner, A., Weidinger, A. F., & Wirthwein, L. (2014).
Academic achievement. Oxford Bibliographies. doi, 10,
9780199756810-0108.
71. Stavrulaki E., Li M. & Gupta J., (2019). Perceived parenting styles,
academic achievement, and life satisfaction of college students: the
mediating role of motivation orientation. European Journal of
Psychology of Education. 10.1007/s10212-020-00493-2
72. Suleman, Q., Hussain, I., Khan, U. F., & Nisa, U. Z. (2012). Effects of
parental socio-economic status on the academic achievement of
secondary school students in Karak
district, Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(4),
2162-305
73. Tokac, U., & Kocayörük, E. (2012). Exploring Effects of Parent
Involvement on Student’s Achievement. International J. Soc. Sci. &
Education, 2(2), 257-263.
74. Jaiswal K. S, & Choudhuri R., (2017). A Review of the Relationship
between Parental Involvement and Students’ Academic Performance.
The International Journal of Indian Psychology, ISSN 2348-5396 (e),
ISSN: 2349-3429, p 120-123
75. Miñano, P., & Castejón, J.L. (2011). Cognitive and motivational variables
in the Academic achievement in language and mathematics subjects: A
structural model. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16(2), 203-230.
76. Miñano, P., Gilar, R., & Castejón, J.L. (2012). A structural model of
cognitive motivational variables as explanatory factors of academic
achievement in Spanish Language and Mathematics’. Anales de
Psicología, 28(1), 45-54.
77. Murugupillai R., Wanigasinhe J., Muniyandi R., & Arambepola C., (2015).
Parental concerns towards children and adolescents with epilepsyin Sri
Lanka—Qualitative study. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British
Epilepsy Association.Seizure 34 (2016) 6– 11
78. Núñez J. C., Regueiro B., Fernández N. S., Valle N., Piñeiro I., Rodicio
M.L., (2018) Student Perception of Teacher and Parent Involvement in
Homework and Student Engagement: The Mediating Role of
Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, (10) 1384, 1- 16
79. Oates T., (2017). Building effective parental involvement in middle
schools: The parents’ perceptions (Doctoraldissesrtaion). Retrieved
from
http://commons.cuportland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1070&context=edudissertation
80. Simpkins, S.D., Fredricks, J.A., & Eccles, J.S. (2012). Charting the Eccles’
expectancy value model from mothers’ beliefs in childhood to youths’
activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1019-
1032.doi: 10.1037/a0027468
81. Tanvir M., Bukhari F., Umbreen K. and Fayyaz S., (2016). Parenting Style
and Its Effects on Academic Achievement of Children. SAMANM
Journal of Business and Social Sciences (4) 1
82. Tahiroğlu, M., & Aktepe, V. (2015). Validity and reliability study on the
motivation scale form designed for 4th and 5th grade social studies
course. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and
History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 907–932.
83. Tarekegn A., Misganaw A., Sitota G (2018) The Relationship between
Parent Involvement and Students’ Academic. Achievement Motivation:
the case of East Harerge Zone Senior Secondary and Preparatory
Schools. Scholars Academic and Scientific Publishers. 1448-1452
84. Taylor et al., (2014), Cortina, M. A., Stein, A., Kahn, K., Hlungwani, T. M.,
Holmes, E. A., & Fazel, M. (2016). Cognitive styles and psychological
functioning in rural South African school students: understanding
influences for risk and resilience in the face of chronic adversity.
Journal of adolescence, 49, 38-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.01.010
85. Ubale AZ, Abdurrahman T, Abdullah AH (2015) A Relationship between
Parental Involvement and Intrinsic Motivation on Learning Islamic
Education. Arts Social Sci J 6: 115. doi:10.4172/2151-6200.1000115
86. Uma K. & Manikandan K., (2014). Parenting Style as a Modertor of Locus
of Control, Self Esteem and Academic Stress among Adolescents.
SCHOLARS WORLD-IRMJCR Volume. II, Issue III, July 2014. pp 64-
73
87. Ural, M. N. (2009). The effect of entertaining and motivational properties
of educational games toacademic achievement and motivation.
Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
88. Valle, A., Regueiro, B., Núñez, J. C., Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., and
Rosário,P. (2016). Academic goals, student homework engagement,
and academic achievement in elementary School. Front. Psychol.
7:463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00463
89. Walker, J.M.T., Wilkins, A.S., Dallaire, J.P., Sandler, H.M., & Hoover-
Dempsey, K.V. (2005). Parental involvement: Model revision through
scale development. Elementary chool Journal,106, 85-104.
90. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., and Klauda, S. L. (2016). ―Expectancy-value
theory,” in Handbook of Motivation in School, 2nd Edn. eds K. R.
Wentzel and D. B. Mielecpesnm (New York, NY: Routledge), 55–74.
91. Wijsman L.A., Warrens M.J., Saab N., van Driel J.H., Westen berg M.,
(2016). Declining trends in student performance in lowe rsecondary
education. Springerlink.com. Eur J Psychol EducDOI 10.1007/s10212-
015-0277-2
92. World Bank in Sri Lanka (2015). The School Family Works Together to
Improve Sri Lankan Student Learning Experience in Public Sector
Schools. Retrieved from
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/05/15/the-school-
family-works-togetherto-improve-srilankan-student-learning-
experience-public-sector-schools
93. Wijesman L., Warrens M., Saab N., Van Direl J., Westen berg P. (2015),
Declining trends in student performance in lower secondary education.
Eur J Psychol Educ 31:595–612
94. Yaseen, M., Zaman, S., & Rasheed, N. (2017). An Empirical Study on the
Role of Parents in Academic Achievement of Children in Private
Schools of Karachi, 84–92.
95. Yilmaz E., Sahin M., Turgut M., (2016). Variables Affecting Student
Motivation Based on Academic Publications, Journal of Education and
Practice, 8 (12), 112-120
96. York T. T., Gibson C., and Rankin S., (2015). Defining and Measuring
Academic Success. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
20(5), 2.
97. Zahedani Z., Rezaee R., Yazdani Z., Bagherai S. and Nabeiei P., (2016).
The influence of parenting style on academic achievement and career
path. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism.
4(3), 130-134.
98. Zong X., Zhang L., and Yao M., (2017). Parental involvement andChinese
elementary students’ achievement goals: the moderating role of
parenting style,Educational Studies DOI:
10.1080/03055698.2017.1373634
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE