Energies 16 01415
Energies 16 01415
Energies 16 01415
Review
Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems
Enas Taha Sayed 1 , Abdul Ghani Olabi 2,3, *, Abdul Hai Alami 2, * , Ali Radwan 2,4 , Ayman Mdallal 2 ,
Ahmed Rezk 5 and Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem 1,2, *
1 Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt
2 Sustainable Energy & Power Systems Research Centre, RISE, University of Sharjah,
Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
3 Mechanical Engineering and Design, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University,
Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
4 Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura 35516, Egypt
5 Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), College of Engineering and Physical Science,
Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
* Correspondence: [email protected] (A.G.O.); [email protected] (A.H.A.);
[email protected] (M.A.A.)
Abstract: The use of fossil fuels has contributed to climate change and global warming, which has
led to a growing need for renewable and ecologically friendly alternatives to these. It is accepted that
renewable energy sources are the ideal option to substitute fossil fuels in the near future. Significant
progress has been made to produce renewable energy sources with acceptable prices at a commercial
scale, such as solar, wind, and biomass energies. This success has been due to technological advances
that can use renewable energy sources effectively at lower prices. More work is needed to maximize the
capacity of renewable energy sources with a focus on their dispatchability, where the function of storage
is considered crucial. Furthermore, hybrid renewable energy systems are needed with good energy
management to balance the various renewable energy sources’ production/consumption/storage. This
work covers the progress done in the main renewable energy sources at a commercial scale, including
solar, wind, biomass, and hybrid renewable energy sources. Moreover, energy management between
the various renewable energy sources and storage systems is discussed. Finally, this work discusses the
Citation: Sayed, E.T.; Olabi, A.G.;
recent progress in green hydrogen production and fuel cells that could pave the way for commercial
Alami, A.H.; Radwan, A.; Mdallal, A.; usage of renewable energy in a wide range of applications.
Rezk, A.; Abdelkareem, M.A.
Renewable Energy and Energy Keywords: large scale renewable energies; solar energy; wind energy; biomass energy; hybrid
Storage Systems. Energies 2023, 16, renewable energy; energy management; green hydrogen; energy storage systems; fuel cells
1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/
en16031415
energy [15–17], biomass energy [18,19], and ocean energy [20,21]. Table 1 shows some of
the large-scale projects implemented worldwide.
Table 1. Examples of the largest renewable energy projects of different technologies around the world.
Power Plant Name Technology Country Year Installed Capacity (MW) Reference
Three Gorges Dam Hydroelectric Power China 2003 22,500 [22]
Itaipu Dam Hydroelectric Power Brazil and Paraguay 1984 14,000 [23]
Bhadla Solar Park Photovoltaics India 2018 2245 [24]
Photovoltaics &
Longyangxia Dam Solar Park China 2015 2130 [25]
Hydroelectric Power
Huanghe Hydropower Hainan
Photovoltaics China 2020 2200 [26]
Solar Park
Gansu Wind Farm On-Shore Wind Farm China 2009 7965 [27,28]
Alta Wind Energy Center On-Shore Wind Farm United States 2010 1550 [28]
Muppandal wind farm On-Shore Wind Farm India - 1500 [28]
Ironbridge power plant Biomass Power Plant United Kingdom 2012 740 [29]
Alholmens Kraft Power Plant Biomass Power Plant Finland 2002 240 [30,31]
Polaniec biomass power plant Biomass Power Plant Poland 2012 220 [32]
Parabolic trough and
Ouarzazate Solar Power Station solar power tower Morocco 2016 580 [33]
(CSP)
solar power tower
Ivanpah Solar Power Facility United States 2014 377 [34]
(CSP)
Parabolic trough
Mojave Solar Project United States 2014 280 [35]
(CSP)
While the various renewable energy sources have promising features, they are mostly
intermittent and thus, need to be integrated with other renewable energy resources and/or
proper energy storage systems [36,37]. The need for flexible high-capacity energy storage in the
power system will grow as renewable energy consumption rises over 80% [38]. Flexibility in
power systems refers to its ability to ensure a supply-demand balance, maintaining continuity
in unpredictable scenarios [39]. Weather variations contribute to the intermittent nature of
electricity generation from some types of renewable sources, such as solar and wind energies.
Calm days can lower the power-generating capacity of wind turbines by 100%, while on
cloudy days, the capacity of solar power plants can be reduced by up to 70%. This is closely
tied to fluctuations in power output from traditional power plant generators and variability
in load demand. With the rising integration of unpredictable renewable energy sources into
the power grid, this challenge has grown in importance and complexity [40]. Therefore,
developing various renewable energies requires developing energy management systems that
optimize the overall performance of the energy system using modern techniques, such as
artificial intelligence, and adequately managing the hybrid renewable energy/energy storage
systems to reduce the effects of the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources. This
work covers the following points: (1) the recent progress in commercial renewable energy
sources focusing on solar energy, wind energy and biomass energy; (2) the progress in hybrid
renewable energy resources/energy storage systems; (3) the development of various energy
management systems to optimize performance; and (4) emerging topics that are effectively
used for the deployment of renewable energy sources at commercial scales, such as green
hydrogen and fuel cells.
2. Solar Energy
Solar energy is one of the renewable energy sources that is available worldwide. Solar
energy, whether solar thermal [41] or solar PV [42], has already been applied in various
applications, such as residential [43], desalination [44], transportation [45], drying [46],
energy, wind energy and biomass energy; (2) the progress in hybrid renewable energy
resources/energy storage systems; (3) the development of various energy management
systems to optimize performance; and (4) emerging topics that are effectively used for the
deployment of renewable energy sources at commercial scales, such as green hydrogen
and fuel cells.
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 3 of 26
2. Solar Energy
Solar energy is one of the renewable energy sources that is available worldwide. Solar
energy, whether solar thermal [41] or solar PV [42], has already been applied in various
irrigation [47], etc. In this regard,
applications, such as several worksdesalination
residential[43], have been[44],
done to cover part
transportation [45],ofdrying
these[46], ir-
developments and applications.
rigation Concentrated
[47], etc. In Solarworks
this regard, several Powerhave
(CSP)
beentechnologies
done to coverarepartone of de-
of these
the promising technologies
velopments and for applications.
generating Concentrated
both heat and electricity.
Solar Globally,
Power (CSP) significant
technologies are one of the
investments havepromising
been made technologies for generating
in the development both heat
of these and electricity.
technologies. SinceGlobally, significant in-
2005, various
commercial systemsvestments
havehave
been been made in the
installed. development
However, of these
we lack thetechnologies. Since 2005, various
necessary experience
to develop CSP commercial systems have
into a dependable, been installed.
low-cost power However, we lack
source. Line the necessary
focus, experience to
which focuses
develop CSP into a dependable, low-cost power source. Line focus, which focuses solar
solar energy along a collector’s focal length (parabolic trough collectors and linear Fresnel
energy along a collector’s focal length (parabolic trough collectors and linear Fresnel re-
reflectors), and point focus, which focuses the energy of the sun on a point (solar thermal
flectors), and point focus, which focuses the energy of the sun on a point (solar thermal
towers and parabolic
towersdishes), are the
and parabolic two types
dishes), are theoftwo
solar collectors
types used [48],
of solar collectors as shown
used in
[48], as shown in
Figure 1. Figure 1.
Figure 1. CSP
Figure 1. Recent available Recent available CSP(a)
technologies: technologies: (a) solar
solar thermal thermal
tower, tower, (b) parabolic
(b) parabolic trough collectors,
trough collectors,
(c) linear fresnel reflectors, (d) parabolic dish [49]. (Source: International Energy Agency, Technol-
(c) linear fresnel reflectors, (d) parabolic dish [49]. (Source: International Energy Agency, Technology
ogy Roadmap-Concentrating Solar Power).
Roadmap-Concentrating Solar Power).
Several research and studies on large scale CSP have been conducted. Ahmadi
et al. [50] carried out a cost estimation for CSP power installations. When compared
to photovoltaic (PV) projects, the initial investment cost of CSP power plants was greater.
However, the financial benefits of CSP plants outperformed those of photovoltaic power
plants. Desideri et al. [51] examined the environmental impacts of various technologies.
The environmental effects of constructing, commissioning, operating, and decommission-
ing PV and CSP installations were also investigated. The PV system assembly had a greater
environmental impact than CSP installations. This encourages one to learn more about the
current CSP circumstances and its ongoing advantages. Gamarra et al. [52] assessed the
sustainability effects of possible CSP project deployments, taking into account various CSP
systems and situations involving component provenance. The findings demonstrated that
central receivers had greater positive financial impacts, both in terms of value added and
increased employment, and less negative environmental implications in terms of carbon
emissions and water consumption. Hansen and Mathiesen [53] presented a unique tech-
nique for assessing the potential of large scale solar thermal technology in Europe. The use
of renewable energies, notably solar thermal energy, to meet European-defined objectives
was evaluated. Countries were chosen based on many factors, including significant heat
voltaic (PV) projects, the initial investment cost of CSP power plants was greater. How-
ever, the financial benefits of CSP plants outperformed those of photovoltaic power
plants. Desideri et al. [51] examined the environmental impacts of various technologies.
The environmental effects of constructing, commissioning, operating, and decommission-
ing PV and CSP installations were also investigated. The PV system assembly had a
greater environmental impact than CSP installations. This encourages one to learn more
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 about the current CSP circumstances and its ongoing advantages. Gamarra et al. [52] as-26
4 of
sessed the sustainability effects of possible CSP project deployments, taking into account
various CSP systems and situations involving component provenance. The findings
demonstrated that central receivers had greater positive financial impacts, both in terms
savings, district heating network
of value added growth,employment,
and increased and high-renewable power
and less negative and heating
environmental sectors.
implications
in terms of carbon
Lambrecht [54] highlighted emissions
previous and water
research andconsumption.
future methods Hansen toand Mathiesen
improve the[53] pre-
pairing
sented a unique technique for assessing the potential of large scale solar thermal technol-
of heat transfer fluids containing material used in CSP plants, with an emphasis on the
ogy in Europe. The use of renewable energies, notably solar thermal energy, to meet Eu-
most promising HTF (heat
ropean-defined transfer fluid):
objectives molten Countries
was evaluated. chlorideweresalts. In fact,
chosen basedtheir
on manycheap cost
factors,
and operational including
temperature range
significant heatmake them
savings, desirable
district candidates
heating network growth, for
andupcoming
high-renewable CSP
plants, which may power and heating
be further sectors. by
improved Lambrecht [54] highlighted
strategically previous research Montenon
adding nanoparticles. and future
methods to improve the pairing of heat transfer fluids containing material used in CSP
and Meligy [55] analyzed the performance of a linear Fresnel collector using a number
plants, with an emphasis on the most promising HTF (heat transfer fluid): molten chloride
of different modeling approaches
salts. In andcost
fact, their cheap compared their results.
and operational Both
temperature with
range andthem
make without the
desirable
use of the PID controller,
candidates for theupcoming
authors CSP examined and may
plants, which contrasted
be furtherthe ISO9806
improved by model, the
strategically
CARNOT model,adding and ananoparticles.
model theyMontenon suggested and called RealTrackEff.
Meligy [55] analyzed the The resultsofrevealed
performance a linear
Fresnelmodel
that the RealTrackEff collectordelivered
using a number of different
the most modeling
accurate approaches
forecasts and actual
of the compared their
output
results. Both with and without the use of the PID controller, the authors examined and
temperatures, with an accuracy of 1.0 degrees Celsius compared to 2.9 degrees Celsius
contrasted the ISO9806 model, the CARNOT model, and a model they suggested called
for the CARNOTRealTrackEff.
model, and The6.3 degrees
results Celsius
revealed that thefor the ISO9806
RealTrackEff model model. The
delivered thesuggested
most accu-
model was the most accurate
rate forecasts of system
the actualrepresentation
output temperatures, andwith
wasanappropriate
accuracy of 1.0for fine-tuning
degrees Celsius
compared to 2.9 degrees Celsius for the CARNOT model, and 6.3 degrees Celsius for the
the controller’s settings.
ISO9806 model. The suggested model was the most accurate system representation and
Solar photovoltaics is a technology that converts solar energy directly into electricity,
was appropriate for fine-tuning the controller’s settings.
and extensive research is being conducted
Solar photovoltaics to improve
is a technology its efficiency.
that converts solar energy Bifacial
directlyphotovoltaics
into electricity,
(BPVs) are gainingandpopularity as potentially
extensive research useful solutions
is being conducted with
to improve its the potential
efficiency. to increase
Bifacial photovoltaics
the energy output by utilizing
(BPVs) are gainingthe rear side
popularity to absorb
as potentially light,
useful decreasing
solutions with thecosts, as to
potential shown
increase in
Figure 2. the energy output by utilizing the rear side to absorb light, decreasing costs, as shown in
Figure 2.
sun irradiation”) revealed a wide range of costs, with “hot-dry/mixed dry” being the
cheapest and “cold, but with decreased sun irradiation” being the most expensive. The
results of a cost sensitivity analysis revealed that the unit cost of solar energy significantly
impacts the overall cost. The cost was inversely proportional to the required reliability
of the power supply, as measured in outage hours. Anani and Ibrahim [58] presented a
comprehensive mathematical analysis and comparison of the performance of commonly
reported analytical methods for parameter extraction of a PV module’s single-diode model
under standard test conditions (STC). Using numerical and iterative methods, the values of
reference parameters were extracted and compared with the parameters extracted using the
various models. Several large-scale solar thermal or PV projects have been implemented
worldwide, as can be seen in Table 2.
Power Plant Name Technology Country Year Installed Capacity (MW) Ref.
Bhadla Solar Park Photovoltaics India 2018 2245 [24]
Huanghe Hydropower
Photovoltaics China 2020 2200 [26]
Hainan Solar Park
Benban Solar Park Photovoltaics Egypt 2019 1600 [59]
United Arab
Noor Abu Dhabi Photovoltaics 2019 1200 [60]
Emirates
United Arab 2022(Under
Noor Energy 1 Parabolic Trough 700 [61]
Emirates Construciton)
Parabolic trough and
Ouarzazate Solar Power
solar power tower Morocco 2016 580 [33]
Station
(CSP)
The Bhadla project, a single solar industrial park, was put into operation in 2017 in
India, the first country to implement an ultra-mega power plant, also known as a UMPP.
The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) had originally set a goal for forty
industrial solar parks with a combined capacity of 20 GW, but that objective was then
increased to 40 GW, planned to be achieved by 2022. Starting in 2020, the Bhadla Solar Park
holds the title as the world’s biggest solar park. About one and a half billion dollars-worth
of total capital was invested in the project [24].
In 2011, China owned the Huanghe Hydropower Golmud Solar Park, which was the
globe‘s biggest photovoltaic solar facility at the time. The photovoltaic capacity of this
installation was 200 MW. A new record was set in 2018 with the Tengger Desert Solar Park
with its 1.5 GW solar capacity. Both of these accomplishments were made in China. The
2.2 GW Huanghe Hydropower Hainan Solar Park, which China now owns, is the world’s
second-largest solar project in terms of capacity. It was planned that by 2020, solar energy
would account for just a small portion of China’s total energy consumption, accounting for
approximately 3.5% of the country’s total energy capacity [26].
The Ouarzazate Solar Power plant has been recognized as a worldwide landmark
project in the solar sector since it became the world’s largest concentrated solar power sta-
tion. It consists of four different power plants with different technologies (power tower and
parabolic trough). The Moroccan government’s dedication to ensuring energy security and
reducing its excessive dependency on the energy supplies of other countries has resulted
in the development of several extremely innovative solar projects. The Ouarzazate Solar
Power plant is a three-phase project that will provide a total of 580 MW and is located in the
desert lands of Draa-Tafilalet, near Ouarzazate. The current heated molten salt technology
that the 2500 hectares project benefits from stores up to 8 h of solar reserves, which are
useful during the project’s nighttime hours of operation. In addition to giving clean energy
to over one million households, this initiative is now in the process of expanding into
subsequent stages to eventually supply clean energy to European nations [33].
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 6 of 26
3. Wind Energy
By converting the wind’s kinetic energy, wind energy may either be transformed
directly into mechanical power or indirectly into electrical energy. The wind turbine is
an essential part of any wind energy system since it is the component responsible for
converting the potential energy of the wind into a form of mechanical power that can then
be used in various contexts. At the beginning of the 20th century, construction began on
the first wind turbine designed to generate electrical power. Despite the fact that wind
turbine technology has been steadily advancing, enormous advances have been particularly
achieved in wind turbine design [62]. Modern technical advancements and refinements
of a turbine and its components have resulted in considerable improvements in produced
power production and efficiency. Furthermore, advancements in particular generators, as
well as the usage of power electronic devices, have enabled gearless turbine designs [63].
The main components of a wind turbine are its tower, blades, and the nacelle, which houses
the generator, gears, and control system. Similar to how an airplane wing provides lift for a
plane, the wind propels the blades into motion. The generator inside the nacelle receives
energy from the turbine through the driving shaft. After the generator has converted the
kinetic energy that is being produced into electrical energy, the transformer will deliver that
energy to the grid. As can be seen in Figure 3, the two primary classifications of present
wind turbines are known as horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) and vertical axis wind
turbines (VAWT). The HAWTs dominate the majority of the wind sector since they are
more efficient and produce more electricity than VAWTs. Since VAWTs are situated close to
the ground and are consequently less exposed to the wind, reducing power production,
they are inherently unreliable [64]. In addition, VAWTs are substantially more expensive
since
Energies 2022, 15, x FORthey need more material and a larger size to provide the same amount of output
PEER REVIEW 7 of 27 as
HAWTs [65].
Figure 3. Wind turbine types: VAWT and HAWT [66]. (Open Access).
Figure 3. Wind turbine types: VAWT and HAWT [66]. (Open Access).
The working principle of wind turbines is simple: the shaft to which the generator is
The working principle
connected revolvesof because
wind turbines
the wind is simple:
causes the shaft
the blades to which
to rotate. the generator
The gearbox increases is
connected revolves because
the turbine the
shaft’s wind causes
rotational the30
speed from blades to rotate.
to 60 rpm The1500
to 1200 and gearbox
rpm inincreases
the gener- the
turbine shaft’sator shaft, which
rotational joins the
speed fromslowly revolving
30 to 60 rpm turbine shaftand
to 1200 to the1500
quickly
rpmspinning
in thegenerator
generator
shaft—causing the magnet that houses the generator to spin copper coils. This magnet
shaft, which joins the slowly revolving turbine shaft to the quickly spinning generator
causes the electrons in the wire to excite, producing electricity. The amount of power gen-
shaft—causingerated
the magnet
depends on that
the houses
quantity ofthe generator
copper coils andtothe
spin
rate copper
at which coils.
the shaft This magnet
rotates in
causes the electrons in the
the magnetic fieldwire to excite,
[67]. Another producing
emerging and new electricity. The amount
technological design ofwind
is bladeless power
generated depends
turbineson the quantity
(Vortex), which aim oftocopper
addresscoils andwith
problems the rotational
rate at which the shaft
wind turbines, rotates
includ-
ing logistics, aesthetics, maintenance, amortization, noise, and
in the magnetic field [67]. Another emerging and new technological design is bladeless influence on birds and the
environment.
wind turbines (Vortex), which aim to address problems with rotational wind turbines,
In contrast to HAWT and VAWT, which work by rotation, vortex bladeless is a vor-
including logistics,
tex-induced vibrationmaintenance,
aesthetics, amortization,
resonant wind generator. noise,ofand
The originality influence
the vortex comeson birds
from
and the environment.
its unique design and method of oscillating energy [68]. As seen in Figure 4, a vortex is a
cylindrical, vertical, and slender device. It is made up of two basic components: a fixed
base that is connected to an anchor and a flexible mast that, by acting as a cantilever, in-
teracts with moving fluid in a more unrestricted manner when the oscillating motion is
taking place. Since it does not have gears or other moving parts that come into touch with
one another, it does not need lubricants or oils as rotary machines do.
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 7 of 26
In contrast to HAWT and VAWT, which work by rotation, vortex bladeless is a vortex-
induced vibration resonant wind generator. The originality of the vortex comes from its
unique design and method of oscillating energy [68]. As seen in Figure 4, a vortex is a
cylindrical, vertical, and slender device. It is made up of two basic components: a fixed base
that is connected to an anchor and a flexible mast that, by acting as a cantilever, interacts
Energies 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW moving fluid in a more unrestricted manner when the oscillating motion is taking
with 8 of 27
place. Since it does not have gears or other moving parts that come into touch with one
another, it does not need lubricants or oils as rotary machines do.
Figure4.4. Schematic
Figure Schematicdrawing
drawingof
ofaabladeless
bladelesswind
windturbine
turbine[69].
[69].(Open
(OpenAccess).
Access).
Through
Through modeling
modeling ofof fluid-solid
fluid-solid interactions
interactions (FSI),
(FSI), Manshadi
Manshadi et
et al.
al. [70]
[70] studied
studied the
the
improvement of the output electrical power of a vortex bladeless turbine,
improvement of the output electrical power of a vortex bladeless turbine, yielding yielding
a com- a
complete dataset for forecasting method and optimal design. As a result, the long short-
plete dataset for forecasting method and optimal design. As a result, the long short-term
term memory (LSTM) approach was presented to estimate the power of the vortex bladeless
memory (LSTM) approach was presented to estimate the power of the vortex bladeless
turbine from the gathered data due to its time-series prediction accuracy [71]. The design
turbine from the gathered data due to its time-series prediction accuracy [71]. The design
and study of a bladeless vortex turbine were carried out by Francis et al. [71], who also tried
and study of a bladeless vortex turbine were carried out by Francis et al. [71], who also
to maximize the amount of deflection that a bladeless turbine might produce. A 3D model
tried to maximize the amount of deflection that a bladeless turbine might produce. A 3D
was constructed with the help of the design program Solid Works, and analyzed using the
model was constructed with the help of the design program Solid Works, and analyzed
ANSYS software to verify the findings. Thakre et al. [72] provided a mathematical analysis
using the ANSYS software to verify the findings. Thakre et al. [72] provided a mathemat-
ical analysis of a bladeless hybrid system, a solar panel, and a comparison analysis of a
bladeless hybrid system with an existing solar wind hybrid model. In addition, they pre-
sented the results of a comparative study of the voltage, current, and power produced by
both hybrid systems. The bladeless hybrid system was developed, and MATLAB Sim-
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 8 of 26
of a bladeless hybrid system, a solar panel, and a comparison analysis of a bladeless hybrid
system with an existing solar wind hybrid model. In addition, they presented the results of
a comparative study of the voltage, current, and power produced by both hybrid systems.
The bladeless hybrid system was developed, and MATLAB Simulink was used to verify all
the results.
Several large-scale wind projects based on two technologies, i.e., on-shore and off-
shore, implemented worldwide are shown in Table 3.
Power Plant Name Technology Country Year Installed Capacity (MW) Reference
Gansu Wind Farm On-Shore Wind Farm China 2009 7965 [27,28]
Alta Wind Energy Center On-Shore Wind Farm United States 2010 1550 [28]
Muppandal wind farm On-Shore Wind Farm India 1986 1500 [28]
Hornsea Project Two Off-Shore Wind Farm United Kingdom 2022 1800 [73]
Off -Shore Wind
Hornsea Project one United Kingdom 2019 1200 [73]
Farm
The Jiuquan Wind Power Base, also known as the Gansu Wind Farm Project, is a group
of huge wind farms currently being constructed on the western side of the Gansu province
in China. The Gansu Wind Farm Project is located in a desert area adjacent to the city of
Jiuquan at two distinct places in Guazhou County, as well as close to Yumen City, in the
northwest province of Gansu (which has an availability of wind power). These sites are
part of Guazhou. The complex only uses 7.965 MW of its installed capacity, while it has a
projected capacity of 20 GW and is now running at less than 40% capacity utilization of its
existing 8 GW [27].
The Alta Wind Energy Center in California has been crowned the wind farm with
total turbines of 1320 MW, and there are plans to extend it to 3000 MW in the future. At the
end of 2012, it had 440 wind turbines as part of its infrastructure. In the United States, 815
wind farms have been placed into service, with a total power capacity of 60 GW. This is
sufficient to power 15 million residences in the United States. Wind power has overtaken
solar as the leading source of newly installed capacity in the United States. The United
States has reclaimed its position as the world’s leading wind power market. China’s wind
power capacity has hit 75 GW, making it the nation with the highest installed capacity
globally [74].
The Hornsea Project Two wind farm, which will become one of the largest offshore
wind projects, received approval from the British government in August 2016, allowing it to
continue with its construction. It can generate 1.8 GW of electricity when fully operational.
This project is an expansion of the 1.2 GW Hornsea Project (offshore wind farm), which was
already cleared for construction. The Hornsea Project comprises 300 wind turbines made
by Dong Energy, is now under development and will produce enough energy to power
1.6 million households. The project’s location will be around 90 kilometers (55 miles) east
of Yorkshire’s coast in England [73].
4. Biomass
Biomass is one of the most available energy forms that is effectively used in several
applications starting from conventional burning [75–77] and ending with direct usage
in fuel cells to generate electricity [78–80]. Although fuel combustion is a conventional
method, it is not the best choice to get the value energy contained in the various biomass
resources. Converting biomass into biofuel, such as biodiesel [81–83] and biochar [84,85],
are promising methods that consequently could be applied in various applications. Figure 5
shows the resources of biomass energy. From this point of view, Han et al. [86] studied
the effect of the acid pretreatment of corn straw on the biochar yield using a hydrothermal
treatment. The results revealed that the acid pretreatment effectively improved the quality
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 9 of 26
of scale associated with plants of this sort. For instance, the Polaniec power plant in
Poland has a capacity of 205 MW and is fueled by biomass, comprised of both wood and
Individual
agricultural facilities
waste have remained
products. relatively small
The Ironbridge power compared
facilitytoin
coal or United
the nuclear-gen-
Kingdom had
erating plants
a capacity due MW,
of 740 to the making
dispersed itnature
one ofofbiomass fuels and
the largest the limiting
biomass power economies
plants inof the world;
scale associated with plants of this sort. For instance, the Polaniec power plant in Poland
however, it was decommissioned in 2015 in accordance with EU regulation after reaching
has a capacity of 205 MW and is fueled by biomass, comprised of both wood and agricul-
thetural
upperwastelimit totalThe
products. lifetime operating
Ironbridge hours
power facility thatUnited
in the wereKingdom
allowed. hadIn 2012, the plant’s
a capacity
fuel source
of 740 MW,was changed
making it one offrom coal to
the largest woodpower
biomass [95]. plants
In Jakobstad/Pietarsaari,
in the world; however, itFinland (at
thewas
time), AlholmensinKraft
decommissioned Ltd.
2015 in had developed
accordance the world’s
with EU regulation afterlargest
reachingbiomass-fired
the upper power
limit which
plant, total lifetime operating
had begun hours that were
commercial allowed.in
operation InOctober
2012, the plant’s
of 2001.fuelThis
source was
environmentally
changedand
friendly fromeconomically
coal to wood [95]. In Jakobstad/Pietarsaari,
feasible power plant can Finland (at the240
generate time),
MW Alholmens
of electricity. This
Kraft Ltd. had developed the world’s largest biomass-fired power plant, which had begun
facility is intended to operate on either 100% coal or 100% biomass (which includes wood,
commercial operation in October of 2001. This environmentally friendly and economically
wood waste, and peat) and any mix of the two. It generates electricity for the pulp and
feasible power plant can generate 240 MW of electricity. This facility is intended to operate
lumber mill’s
on either 100% internal use and
coal or 100% for export
biomass to the Nordpool
(which includes wood, wood grid. Additionally,
waste, and peat) andit can export
low-quality
any mix of the heat forIt use
two. in theelectricity
generates Pietarsaari district
for the heating
pulp and lumbersystem [96]. use and
mill’s internal
for export to the Nordpool grid. Additionally, it can export low-quality heat for use in the
5. Pietarsaari
Hybrid Renewable Energy
district heating systemSources
[96].
Although renewable energy sources are sustainable and have zero or minimal adverse
5. Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources
effects on the surrounding environment, the vast majority, such as wind and solar power,
Although renewable energy sources are sustainable and have zero or minimal ad-
only produce energy intermittently. Therefore, renewable energy sources have to be
verse effects on the surrounding environment, the vast majority, such as wind and solar
integrated
power, onlywith energy
produce storage
energy systems.Therefore,
intermittently. Sometimes there are
renewable several
energy different
sources have to renewable
energy sources
be integrated integrated
with withsystems.
energy storage one orSometimes
more other energy
there storage
are several systems,
different renewa-as shown in
Figure 6. The
ble energy main
sources purpose
integrated of one
with these integrations
or more is to
other energy guarantee
storage systems,a as
continuous
shown energy
in Figure
supply 6. The
all day atmain purposecost
the lowest of these integrations
[97–99]. Many isresearchers
to guaranteehave
a continuous
studiedenergy
the combination
of supply all day
different at the lowest
renewable cost [97–99].
energy systems Many researchers
to provide have studiedhigher
carbon-free, the combination
energy production,
of different renewable energy systems to provide carbon-free, higher energy production,
and cheap energy sources [100].
and cheap energy sources [100].
Figure 6. Schematic of hybrid wind/PV/thermal power plants integrated with different energy stor-
Figure 6. Schematic of hybrid wind/PV/thermal power plants integrated with different energy
age systems.
storage systems.
Using a computational design strategy, Kim et al. [101] determined the dimensions
of aUsing
hybridapower
computational
system thatdesign
includedstrategy, Kim et solar,
national electric, al. [101]
and determined
fuel cells, andthe
thendimensions
of determined
a hybrid power
the ratiosystem that
values of the included national
system. Between 0.46 electric,
to 0.54 wassolar, andratio
the ideal fuelofcells,
the and then
amount of energy
determined generated
the ratio valuesbyoffuel
thecells to thatBetween
system. generated 0.46
by solar cells.was
to 0.54 In addition, the ratio of the
the ideal
authorsof
amount provided
energyagenerated
revised version of the
by fuel uDEAS
cells method,
to that which stands
generated by solarfor cells.
“univariate
In addition, the
dynamic encoding algorithm for searches,” as a new optimization strategy. Bauer et al.
authors provided a revised version of the uDEAS method, which stands for “univariate
dynamic encoding algorithm for searches,” as a new optimization strategy. Bauer et al. [102]
investigated the idea of merging biological power-to-methane conversion to help and
maintain the energy transition of power, heat, and gas. To improve the energy system, the
Calliope tool was employed.
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 11 of 26
Gajewski and Piekowski [103] examined cutting-edge hybrid renewable energy sys-
tems (HRES) via analysis and simulation. The HRES consisted of a generator for the wind
turbine called a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG), a system of solar panels,
and a system for storing energy in batteries. Research on the multi-converter DC-coupled
design of the HRES was carried out. Under a wide range of varied operational situations for
renewable energy sources, the system guaranteed that the loads would receive the correct
amount of power flow at all times. The PMSG control method with machine-side converter
was based on rotor field-oriented control. Additionally, it contained the tip speed ratio
(TSR) algorithm which is used in the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm.
The method known as direct power control (DPC) was put into practice to control the
grid-side converter. The DPC ensured that the voltage value of the DC connection was
appropriately maintained to the reference value and could alter the necessary power flows
between the grid and the system. The PV system’s operation control was implemented
using the MPPT algorithm, which is founded on the perturbation and observation (P&O)
approach. Using this method, the researchers could determine the level of solar irradiation
and the temperature of the surrounding environment that would result in the greatest
amount of power being produced by photovoltaic cells. The defined energy management
procedures made it possible for the wind and solar energy systems to operate as intended
in various environmental circumstances, all while keeping the load side’s power supply
demand at the required level. The converter system, which used battery energy storage,
was incorporated into the design and was connected to the common DC connection. This
was done to facilitate communication between the two systems. Even in conditions where
wind speeds or solar irradiation values were low, the renewable hybrid system could
nevertheless reliably provide the load with the necessary amount of power. The battery
system stored any extra power produced by the wind turbine or solar panel system in the
event it created more energy than necessary. When the battery was used up to its maxi-
mum capacity, any remaining power was sent back into the grid that supplied alternating
current electricity. The simulation results showed that the wind turbine control system,
consisting of PV panels, a battery energy system, and a directly driven PMSG, was of very
high quality.
To lower electricity costs, residential properties must have home energy management
(HEM) systems. Energy consumption and expenses might be decreased by combining
renewable energy sources (RES) with battery energy storage systems (BESSs) and central
battery storage systems (CBSSs). Rashid et al. [104] established a cost-effective HEM
scheme within the context of a microgrid to encourage the decrease of energy demand
while also considering energy storage and the incorporation of renewable sources. The user
preferences and the length of time they need the appliance to operate may affect the runtime
preferences and lengths of operation of typical household appliances. These preferences
and durations of operation can vary. The HEM model allows residential consumers to
modify their total energy consumption profile, lowering the expenses connected with
it and giving them access to real-time pricing. By merging RES, BESSs, and CBSSs in
a shared power environment, the HEM model is able to reduce energy use and save
money. Papadopoulou et al. [105] compared a hybrid system comprised of photovoltaics
(PV) and offshore wind energy, as well as two distinct storage options. In this regard,
the aforementioned technologies were compared using two complimentary metrics: the
levelized cost of energy and the net present value. The hybrid system was more energy-
cost-efficient.
Noor Energy 1 will be responsible for putting into action the 700MW CSP + 250MW
PV Project found in the fourth and final phase of the Mohammed bin Rashid Solar Park.
By its completion, this project will have created the largest single-site concentrated solar
power plant in the world. Additionally, the levelized cost of power has set a new global
record at $7.3 cents per kilowatt-hour, making it competitive with electricity generated from
fossil fuels without subsidies for reliable solar energy that can be dispatched at all hours of
the night. The technique combines the tallest solar tower in the world (at 260 m tall and
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 12 of 26
100 MW) with parabolic trough concentrated solar power technologies (totaling 600 MW
and split into 200 MW for each unit) to harness solar energy and bifacial photovoltaics
(250 MW), which convert sunlight from both sides of a solar panel. This project helps Dubai
reach its Renewable Strategy goal of using 25% renewable energy by 2030. Moreover, it will
prevent the release of 2.4 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) into the atmosphere [61].
Zebra et al. [106] focuses on the application of HRESs for off-grid electrification in
developing-country rural populations that lack access to inexpensive, dependable, and
sustainable sources of energy. The research examines HRESs as a means of overcoming
renewables’ fluctuating nature and compares the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of sev-
eral mini-grids. Diesel is the most costly technology when compared to solar photovoltaic
and hybrid solar photovoltaic/diesel. The research also highlights elements that impact the
effective integration of HRESs, including as government support and community organiza-
tion, which are critical for the systems’ long-term viability. Furthermore, the paper tackles
hurdles to mini-grid adoption, such as a lack of supporting policies and expensive capital
costs, but emphasizes that government incentives may assist minimize these costs. The
findings of this research are especially noteworthy for underdeveloped nations, because
power provision through HRESs is often faster and less expensive than grid expansion.
According to the report, more research on appropriate local design and ownership models
might assist speed and decrease the costs of sustainable power provision in distant places.
CleanMax has begun offering a service called wind-solar hybrid (WSH) to businesses
and factories that have significant power demands. The WSH projects in India combine
solar and wind energy to take advantage of their synergistic effects on electricity output.
Under a build-own-operate or energy sale paradigm, CleanMax has implemented this
WSH solution for one of the organizations with the most significant data center operations.
A 13.5 MW WSH power plant with a solar hybridization rate of less than 52% will provide
the client with around 90% of their required energy (wind capacity 13.5 MW and solar
capacity 10.5 MW). It is expected that the wind-solar hybrid plant will generate around
57 million units of energy annually, resulting in an annual decrease of about 46,740 tons
of CO2 emissions. While the wind turbine capacity has been installed and commissioned,
the solar panel capacity is still being added and is expected to be commissioned within the
next few of months. The 13.5 MW WSH plant is part of a larger 150 MW WSH project being
built by CleanMax [107].
Table 4. Renewable energy installed capacities and electricity production in the world [108].
Table 5. Renewable energy installed capacities and electricity production in the most contributed
countries [108].
7. Energy Management
As aforementioned, the majority of RES are intermittent, such as solar, wind, and
wave energies. Therefore, managing a hybrid energy system composed of one or more
renewable energy sources and one or more energy storage systems is frequently used to
obtain a sustainable energy source with the lowest energy cost. Energy may be stored
through a variety of techniques. These techniques are frequently categorized according
to the period that the energy will be stored. The most prevalent methods for categoriz-
ing energy storage systems are based on the kind of energy storage used and the time
it takes for the system to discharge its stored energy. Based on how long it takes for the
stored energy to be discharged, techniques of energy storage may be categorized as either
short-term (seconds or minutes), medium-term (minutes or hours), or long-term (hours
to days). The type of converted energy has a significant impact on how energy storage
techniques are categorized. These can be categorized into five major categories: mechanical,
electrochemical, thermal, electrical, and chemical energy storage. These technologies store
energy until it is needed [109]. Various energy systems are available such as supercapac-
itors [110,111], batteries [112,113], flywheel [114,115], compressed air [116,117], thermal
energy storage [118,119], pumped hydro [120], and others. Table 6 shows a comparison
between the different storage systems, and Table 7 shows the largest energy storage systems
installed around the globe.
Pumped hydroelectric storage uses electricity produced during off-peak hours to
raise water from a lower tank to a higher tank, dam, or reservoir, where it may be stored
as potential energy. To make use of the higher reservoir as a storage space for surplus
electrical power, a pump is installed within the conduit that connects the lower and higher
pools. This pump moves water from the lower reservoir into the higher reservoir. The
amount of energy retained there is determined by the amount of water stored, as well as
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 14 of 26
the difference in level between the two pools of water. If there is a shortage in the grid or in
the production of the local sources of energy, the water that is held in the upper reservoir
may be released, which will cause turbines and generators to produce electrical energy.
This will help make up for the shortage. The energy required to drive these pumps and
turbines may be sourced from local energy sources, consumed, or delivered into the grid,
all of which are viable options [121].
The utilization of the potential energy that is stored during the pressurization of
a compressible fluid is the central focus of the design process that goes into creating
compressed-air energy storage devices. The execution of the tasks required to run in-
stallations based on this concept is not too complicated. When there is less demand for
power, fluid is forced into a smaller, more impermeable reservoir, where it is subjected to
sustained high pressure over an extended period. During periods of very heavy demand,
the available electrical supply will be bolstered. In this scenario, the fluid is released
from its high-pressure storage and is fed into a rotating energy extraction mechanism
known as an air turbine. This mechanism converts the kinetic energy of the fluid into
rotating mechanical energy in a wheel connected to an electrical generator, which is then
fed back into the grid [122]. Large-scale compressed air energy storage methods, such
as pumped hydro storage, reap the benefits of having both cavernous and impermeable
subterranean reservoirs simultaneously. Natural salt mines and oil and gas fields that
have been drained of their resources would be the best possibilities for meeting such a
substantial need for storage space; nevertheless, it is unfortunate that these resources are
not commonly available.
A battery storage system is an advanced technological solution that enables electricity
to be stored until it is needed. Rechargeable batteries, particularly lithium-ion battery
storage systems, have several advantages, including greater renewable energy output,
economic savings, and sustainability, owing to reduced consumption. Energy battery
storage systems typically have a lifetime of five to 15 years. Supercapacitors are electro-
chemical energy storage devices that employ the same fundamental equations as control
capacitors. However, supercapacitors frequently utilize porous carbon or electrodes with
more significant surface areas and thinner dielectrics to collect huge numbers of charge car-
riers. Numerous benefits are provided by this type of system, such as extraordinarily high
capacitance characteristics, on the order of thousands of farads, increased cycle life, low
internal resistance, quick charging and discharging, extraordinary reversibility, excellent
low-temperature performance, no destructive material, lower cost per cycle, and high cycle
efficiency (up to 95%) [123].
In the power industry, only one of the three distinct types of thermal energy storage
devices is now available at a commercial scale. The alternatives involve a level of complex-
ity and expense that are not comparable to sensible heat storage. Both thermal-chemical
storage systems and latent energy storage are considered to be rather costly and mostly
experimental technology. In the field of power production, the method of storing thermal
energy is commonly referred to as sensible heat storage. In a sensible heat thermal energy
storage system, energy is stored by either heating or cooling a solid or liquid storage
medium, such as molten salt, sand, water, or rocks. Other examples of storage mediums
include; Sensible heat storage is common in concentrated solar power (CSP) plants. These
plants make use of thermal energy storage so that they may continue producing electricity
long after the sun has set. Molten salts are the material of choice in most CSP systems
that use thermal energy storage because of their ability to withstand extremely high tem-
peratures. Although it is very seldomly used in the field of power production, latent
heat storage has shown to be potentially useful in a range of contemporary technologies.
A change in the state of the medium used to store heat, such as from solid to liquid, is
necessary for the process of latent heat storage. The term “phase change material” (PCMs)
may also be used to refer to latent heat storage mediums. The term “thermo-chemical
storage,” or TCS, refers to a method of energy storage that makes use of chemical processes.
Compared to PCMs, the energy density of TCS systems is much more attractive [124].
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 15 of 26
Power-wise, the Three Gorges Dam far surpasses any other hydroelectric dam. The
dam came into use in 2013, so it is still quite new. It can hold 22,500 MW of capacity. The
dam is found in the Xilingxia Gorge, one of the three gorges situated in the Hubei province
of China along the Yangtze River. It is claimed by NASA to be one of the few man-made
structures on Earth visible to the human eye when viewing the world from space. A
combined annual output of 84.7 billion kWh is anticipated from the 26 power-producing
units, each with a generating capacity of 700 MW. The Three Gorges dam is one of the
longest dams in the world at 2.3 kilometers long. Its undertaking required the participation
of about 40,000 employees and was carried out over 17 years. Approximately 28 million
cubic meters of concrete were used in the construction project, making it a massive structure.
To prevent flooding, gates for a spillway were constructed along the concrete pillars. Water
may be discharged via these gates and travel more than 100 m downstream. The dam is
2309 m in length and has a height of 185 m. The predicted 85 TW/h of energy from the
dam project is nearly one-tenth of China’s current demand. The project was estimated to
cost $22.5 billion [22].
Florida Power & Light’s (FPL) decision to replace the Manatee Energy Storage Center’s
gas-fired generation with solar energy/battery storage was motivated by the utility’s plan
to eliminate more than one million tons of CO2 emissions from its portfolio, and to generate
savings of one hundred million dollars for its customers. Within the scope of this strategy
is the installation of 30 million solar panels by the year 2030 after completing some less
extensive battery installations around the state. The FPL concluded that the relatively
low prices of battery technology might be utilized to both replace the Manatee plant and
provide consumers with clean energy. An energy storage facility with a capacity of 409 MW
will take the place of the Manatee plant, which is scheduled for retirement. The information
provided by FPL indicates that this will be the largest battery system installed in the
world. The energy storage facility will stretch over an area of 40 acres in size and have
the capacity to distribute 900 MWh of power. While still in operation, the two outdated
gas-fired peaker facilities will be replaced by the Manatee Energy Storage, which will
then be fueled by the FPL solar facility and will store the energy. The solar plus storage
system provides an added benefit to customers in the form of cost savings (approximately
$100 million in savings to ratepayers), a reduction in emissions (one million tons of CO2 ),
an improvement in service reliability, an increase in the integration of clean energy, and the
creation of new jobs (approximately 70 new jobs during construction) [125]. Companies
that manufacture batteries are engaged in a race to develop ever-more-capable utility-scale
battery systems. The Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility, owned and operated by Vistra
Energy, began operations in 2021 with a 400 MW/1600 MWh capacity. The battery at this
site was the largest ever constructed. In January of 2022, Vistra announced that the Moss
Landing Energy Storage Facility would gain an expansion that will increase its capacity to
750 MW/3000 GWh by the end of the year 2023 [126].
Compared with all of these energy storage systems, a grid is the largest energy stor-
age that can accept huge amounts of energy. Grid protection is becoming more difficult
as more renewable energy sources are incorporated and converted to usable forms by
power electronic inverters. Inverter-based resources have failure responses that differ from
conventional generators due to improved inverter control algorithms. This distinction
has the potential to have a significant impact on how the power grid is protected. Ekic
et al. [127] explored the dynamics of solar inverters by utilizing a real-time digital simulator
(RTDS). The researchers focused their attention on the negative-sequence quantities that
occurred during the restoration phase after a grid disruption. The authors conducted
research on the dynamics of solar inverters by using RTDS-based electromagnetic transient
simulations with detailed inverter models that take into account switching dynamics, as
well as inverter blocking and deblocking modes. They placed a particular emphasis on the
negative-sequence current that occurred during the time when the grid was being restored.
In addition to this, they investigated the ways in which these dynamics influenced various
protection mechanisms. Solar inverters, after they have been cleared of any obstructions,
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 16 of 26
Technology Power Rating (MW) Cycle Efficiency (%) Lifetime (Years) LCOE ($/kWh)
Compressed Air 110–1000 42–54 20–40 2–120
Pumped Hydro Storage 30–5000 70–87 40–60 5–100
Thermal Energy Storage 0.1–300 30–60 20–30 3–60
Lead Acid Batteries 0–40 63–90 5–15 50–400
Li-ion Batteries 0–100 75–97 14–16 600–3800
Flywheels 0.25–20 90–95 15–20 1000–14,000
Supercapacitors 0–0.3 84–97 10–30 300–2000
Fuel Cells <58.5 20–66 ~20 2–15
Super magnetic Conducting
0.1–10 95–98 20–30 500–72,000
Energy Storage
Power Plant Name Technology Country Year Installed Capacity (MW) Reference
Three Gorges Dam Hydroelectric Power China 2003 22,500 [22]
Itaipu Dam Hydroelectric Power Brazil and Paraguay 1984 14,000 [23]
Total of 7325 MWt
Ouarzazate Solar Thermal Storage NOOR I (1200) MWt
Morocco 2018 [128]
Power Station (Molten Satl) NOOR II (3500) MWt
NOOR III (2625) MWt
Manatee Energy
Batteries United States 2021 409 [125]
Storage Center
Moss Landing Vistra
Lithium-Ion Batteries United States 2020 400 [126]
Battery
control. It has been established that including electrolyzer installations into MV networks
has a good influence, not only on the optimal voltage values from the point of view of the
quality indicator that is being used, but also on minimizing the amount of power that is lost
in the network. The method of optimum voltage control is one that has the potential to be
carried out effectively if certain requirements are met. One of these factors is that the real
network must be precisely mapped before the optimization process can begin. In order to
develop a calculating model, it is necessary to make an assessment of the current condition
of the MV networks. The measurements of current and voltage that are carried out are what
allow for the creation of this estimate in the first place. Due to the radial topology of the
network, which consists of just a few numbers of nodes, the complexity of the computations
required to solve this issue is significantly decreased when compared to multi-node closed
HV networks. It would seem that the application of the suggested voltage control system
is feasible in practice due to the relatively small scale of the computational task, and as a
result, the short length of time required to obtain outcomes. This allows for the process of
optimal control to be carried out in real-time, which is advantageous.
Utilizing distributed generating systems (DGSs) is one of the most significant advances
facilitating the energy transition. The DGSs provide for more user agency over energy use
and production, but are more complex to set up and maintain. The optimization models
that are being applied under uncertainty in DGSs is summarized by Alonso-Travesset
et al. [130]. The authors analyzed more than 170 articles that optimized DGSs while
considering uncertainty. The authors showed that adding elements, such as grid testbed
validation, a battery aging model, taking into account demand response or controlled loads,
correlating unknown parameters, and decentralization, all added to the complexity of the
models. All of these improvements, along with others under development, will allow
optimization models to be used in practice. It is expected that the number of DGS-focused
research initiatives will grow, making a significant contribution to the energy transition
and paving the way toward a totally green society free of carbon emissions.
Transportation is one of the major pollution sources that must be electrified in order
to reduce global warming. Commercially, electric vehicles (EVs), including hybrids, are
currently in use. A hybrid electric vehicle (HEV)’s energy management strategy (EMS) and
control algorithm have a direct influence on energy efficiency, control effect, and system de-
pendability. The difficulty is in designing an efficient EMS and a suitable control algorithm
for a particular configuration of a HEV engine in order to achieve a number of different
developmental objectives, while simultaneously preserving vehicle performance [131].
The EMSs and control algorithms of HEVs were compared by Xue et al. [131] in terms
of features, applicability, real-time capabilities, and the technological advancement that
has occurred over time. Various control systems each have their own set of limitations
when it comes to the difficulties associated with the management of energy that comes
along with HEVs. Existing EMSs only take fuel economy into account, and there have only
been a handful of in-depth studies done on economy, emissions, battery life, and driving
style. Deciding the maximum power point at which any device is operated is important to
increase efficiency and decrease the cost. Thermoelectric generators (TEG) are effectively
used to harvest power from different resources, including the waste heat generated in
various processes. Deciding the MPP of the thermoelectric generators will also improve the
efficiency; therefore, Kanagaraj et al. [132] introduced an innovative MPPT method that is
based on VFOFLC, which stands for “variable fractional order fuzzy logic controller.” This
method is intended to extract the most amount of energy that can be obtained from the
TEG. The fractional factor was included into the MPPT approach that was presented so that
the length of time required to track up to the peak level in the P-V curve could be reduced,
and the steady-state output could be maintained at a level that was centered around the
MPP. The findings of the research indicated that the MPPT technique based on VFOFLC
was able to modify the duty cycle of the DC–DC boost converter in an appropriate manner
by employing the variable fractional factor. This was demonstrated by the fact that the
technique made use of the variable fractional factor.
from the TEG. The fractional factor was included into the MPPT approach that was pre-
sented so that the length of time required to track up to the peak level in the P-V curve
could be reduced, and the steady-state output could be maintained at a level that was
centered around the MPP. The findings of the research indicated that the MPPT technique
based on VFOFLC was able to modify the duty cycle of the DC–DC boost converter in an
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 18 of 26
appropriate manner by employing the variable fractional factor. This was demonstrated
by the fact that the technique made use of the variable fractional factor.
Figure 7.
Figure Fuelcells
7. Fuel cellsstack
stack and
and components
components schematic
schematic[140].
[140].(With
(Withpermission,
permission, license number:
license number:
5430310482582).
Proton exchange
Proton exchange membrane
membrane fuel fuel cells
cells (PEMFCs)
(PEMFCs) are are the
the most
most prevalent
prevalent kind
kind ofof fuel
fuel
cells that can function in a variety of applications, even when the temperature
cells that can function in a variety of applications, even when the temperature is rather is rather
low [141,142].
low [141,142]. Due
Due to
to the
the importance
importance of of this
this type
type ofof fuel
fuel cells,
cells, proton
proton exchange
exchange membrane
membrane
fuel cells, including their materials and methods of manufacture,
fuel cells, including their materials and methods of manufacture, were summed up were summed up byby
Olabi et al. [143]. The authors showed that a considerable amount of
Olabi et al. [143]. The authors showed that a considerable amount of focus was spent on focus was spent
on the
the newly
newly created
created materials
materials that that
werewere utilized
utilized for PEMFC,
for PEMFC, as as
as well well
theasfeatures
the features of
of these
these materials. In spite of the progress that has been achieved with PEMFCs,
materials. In spite of the progress that has been achieved with PEMFCs, there are still there are
still challenges that need to be handled before these devices can be deemed inexpensive
challenges that need to be handled before these devices can be deemed inexpensive and
and extensively utilized. These concerns include the cost of these devices as well as their
extensively utilized. These concerns include the cost of these devices as well as their du-
durability. Two of the difficulties that the FC must overcome are its low power density
rability. Two of the difficulties that the FC must overcome are its low power density and
and its poor mechanical durability. When it comes to the components that make up the
its poor mechanical durability. When it comes to the components that make up the mem-
membrane, the Nafion membrane delivers the highest level of performance. The search for
brane, the Nafion membrane delivers the highest level of performance. The search for new
new materials that are capable of entirely replacing Nafion and platinum is the primary
materials that are capable of entirely replacing Nafion and platinum is the primary focus
focus of efforts being put forth right now by those who are making those attempts. When
of efforts being put forth right now by those who are making those attempts. When it
it comes to end plates, the most major challenge is the deflection, which is particularly
troublesome for stacks that include a big number of cells. This is because the deflection
causes the end plates to bend out of shape. This problem may be solved by using a material
with a high tensile strength, yet still relatively lightweight.
Renewable energy is widely recognized as one of the most potentially fruitful ap-
proaches to achieving sustainable development goals related to reducing greenhouse gas
emissions. Today, we are confronted with the challenge of further expanding the infrastruc-
ture for renewable energy, which calls for the development of dependable energy storages,
carriers that are kind to the environment, such as hydrogen, and highly competitive inter-
national markets.
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 19 of 26
The most significant trends in the expansion of renewable energy, as well as the
chances for further scaling up this expansion via the use of green hydrogen solutions and
the participation of resource-based nations in energy transition processes, were analyzed by
Kopteva et al. [144] These included three potential strategic scenarios for the development
of the energy industry: (1) the diffusion of renewable energy sources into the current
energy system via the development of power accumulators; (2) the prerequisites for the
development of green hydrogen; and (3) other related areas. The authors also analyzed
a pilot project’s technical and economic feasibility to produce green hydrogen in the Ma-
gadan area (Russia). The authors concluded that most businesses’ projections regarding
the hydrogen demand level in international markets are optimistic. At the moment, the
majority of hydrogen is produced through a process known as steam methane reforming.
This process results in significant emissions of carbon dioxide, which in turn exacerbate
the greenhouse effect. This concern for the environment gives impetus to the process of
methane cracking, which is one of the most promising alternatives to the production of hy-
drogen and has the potential to produce zero CO2 or carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. The
cracking of methane has been the subject of extensive research, utilizing both metallic and
carbonaceous catalysts. Researchers have recently concentrated their efforts on pyrolyzing
methane in molten metals and salts to avoid the problems of reactor coking and rapid
catalyst deactivation. A further advantage that is anticipated to arise is an improvement
in heat transfer due to the high heat capacity of molten media. The energy used in the
endothermic process can help lessen adverse environmental impacts in addition to the
reaction that takes place and produces solid carbon and hydrogen. For pyrolysis in molten
medium, concentrated solar energy has not been substantially investigated. The majority
of studies have relied on electrical heating or the burning of fossil fuels as nonrenewable
sources. However, it has the potential to be a viable and innovative route to further en-
hance the sustainability of hydrogen generation obtained from methane cracking. Msheik
et al. [145] provided a summary of the research conducted on the generation of hydrogen
by catalytic and molten media pyrolysis. The authors showed that the use of solid metals
and carbonaceous catalysts for catalyzed methane cracking highlighted several noteworthy
problems. These issues were principally concerned with the deactivation of the catalysts
and the accompanying regeneration procedures. As a consequence, there was a limitation
in the overall efficiency of the process, and it was unable to maintain the environmentally
friendly qualities of methane cracking. The utilization of solar energy could be a feasible
alternative for building a sustainable pyrolysis process to overcome the limits imposed by
the catalyst. The high operating temperatures that may be obtained via the concentration
of solar energy have made it feasible to do away with the need to use catalysts in the
process of thermal methane pyrolysis. In addition, there is no production of CO or CO2
emissions, and the heat that is necessary for this endothermic process is obtained only from
the concentrated energy that is provided by the sun.
9. Others
Wave energy is a clean and sustainable type of energy that may be harvested in coastal
areas. When undertaking analytical, numerical, and experimental investigations, such as
those involving wave farms and extremely large floating structures, it is standard practice
to use the assumption that the wave field is uniform over its whole. When it comes to
the interactions between the floating components, the direction, amplitude, and phase of
the waves acting on each element are all important factors to consider. Consequently, it is
probably unreasonable to anticipate that the waves would be consistent in the near-shore
locations where these systems will be situated. Rodrigues [146] shows that interaction
theory can deal with inhomogeneous wave conditions. When the amount of energy
produced by renewable sources is more than the amount of energy used, a variety of
energy storage technologies may be utilized to store the excess energy. According to
Nemś [147], the shape of the components that make up the thermal energy storage system
affects how heat is transferred through those materials. In order for scientists to make a
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 20 of 26
10. Conclusions
The use of fossil fuels has contributed to a rise in climate change and global warming,
raising the need for energy sources that are both sustainable and kind to the environment.
It would seem that the most viable alternatives to fossil fuels will soon be those derived
from renewable energy sources. Since the turn of the twenty-first century, there has been a
significant increase in the focus placed on studying renewable energy systems. Among the
various renewable energy sources, significant research has been focused on commercially
available solar and wind energy. The most current innovations and achievements in the
fields of solar, wind, biomass energy, and energy storage systems have been highlighted in
this review. It has been described that hybrid renewable energy sources, including energy
storage systems, are necessary to reduce the negative effect of renewable energy sources’
intermittent nature. Furthermore, proper energy management is essential to balance energy
production/consumption/storage from various renewable energy sources, as well as the case
of connecting renewable energy to the grid. Large-scale energy storage systems integrated
with various renewable energy sources were also discussed. There is a rapid deployment of
renewable energy at a large scale worldwide, and this transition from fossil fuel increases with
the technical advances in renewable energy and energy storage technologies.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, A.G.O., A.H.A. and M.A.A.; methodology, E.T.S., A.M.,
A.R. (Ali Radwan) and A.R. (Ahmed Rezk); formal analysis, A.G.O., E.T.S., A.H.A., A.M., A.R. (Ali
Radwan), A.R. (Ahmed Rezk) and M.A.A.; investigation, A.G.O. and M.A.A.; resources, A.G.O.; data
curation, A.G.O., A.H.A. and M.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.O., E.T.S., A.H.A.,
A.M., A.R. (Ali Radwan), A.R. (Ahmed Rezk) and M.A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.G.O.,
E.T.S., A.H.A., A.M., A.R. (Ali Radwan), A.R. (Ahmed Rezk) and M.A.A.; supervision, A.G.O. and
A.H.A.; project administration, A.G.O. and M.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Makieła, K.; Mazur, B.; Głowacki, J. The Impact of Renewable Energy Supply on Economic Growth and Productivity. Energies
2022, 15, 4808. [CrossRef]
2. Khezri, M.; Karimi, M.S.; Mamkhezri, J.; Ghazal, R.; Blank, L. Assessing the Impact of Selected Determinants on Renewable
Energy Sources in the Electricity Mix: The Case of ASEAN Countries. Energies 2022, 15, 4604. [CrossRef]
3. Zhu, Y.; Huo, C. The Impact of Agricultural Production Efficiency on Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China. Energies 2022, 15, 4464.
[CrossRef]
4. Roosjen, S.; Glushenkov, M.; Kronberg, A.; Kersten, S. Waste Heat Recovery Systems with Isobaric Expansion Technology Using
Pure and Mixed Working Fluids. Energies 2022, 15, 5265. [CrossRef]
5. Shiojiri, D.; Iida, T.; Hirayama, N.; Imai, Y.; Sugawara, H.; Kusaka, J. Recent Studies on the Environmentally Benign Alkaline-Earth
Silicide Mg2 Si for Middle-Temperature Thermoelectric Applications. Energies 2022, 15, 4859. [CrossRef]
6. Sousa, C.C.; Martins, J.; Carvalho, Ó.; Coelho, M.; Moita, A.S.; Brito, F.P. Assessment of an Exhaust Thermoelectric Generator
Incorporating Thermal Control Applied to a Heavy Duty Vehicle. Energies 2022, 15, 4787. [CrossRef]
7. Wilberforce, T.; Ijaodola, O.; Baroutaji, A.; Ogungbemi, E.; Olabi, A.G. Effect of Bipolar Plate Material on Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel Cell Performance. Energies 2022, 15, 1886. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 21 of 26
8. Alaswad, A.; Omran, A.; Sodre, J.R.; Wilberforce, T.; Pignatelli, G.; Dassisti, M.; Baroutaji, A.; Olabi, A.G. Technical and
Commercial Challenges of Proton-Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells. Energies 2020, 14, 144. [CrossRef]
9. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Prospects of Fuel Cell Combined Heat and Power Systems.
Energies 2020, 13, 4104. [CrossRef]
10. Said, R.; Bhatti, M.I.; Hunjra, A.I. Toward Understanding Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development in Developing and
Developed Economies: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 5349. [CrossRef]
11. Meirinhos, G.; Malebo, M.; Cardoso, A.; Silva, R.; Rêgo, R. Information and Public Knowledge of the Potential of Alternative
Energies. Energies 2022, 15, 4928. [CrossRef]
12. Ahmed, N.; Sheikh, A.A.; Hamid, Z.; Senkus, P.; Borda, R.C.; Wysokińska-Senkus, A.; Glabiszewski, W. Exploring the Causal
Relationship among Green Taxes, Energy Intensity, and Energy Consumption in Nordic Countries: Dumitrescu and Hurlin
Causality Approach. Energies 2022, 15, 5199. [CrossRef]
13. Veerendra Kumar, D.J.; Deville, L.; Ritter, K.A., III; Raush, J.R.; Ferdowsi, F.; Gottumukkala, R.; Chambers, T.L. Performance
Evaluation of 1.1 MW Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant in Louisiana. Energies 2022, 15, 3420. [CrossRef]
14. Duvenhage, D.F.; Brent, A.C.; Stafford, W.H.L.; den Heever, D. Optimising the Concentrating Solar Power Potential in South
Africa through an Improved GIS Analysis. Energies 2020, 13, 3258. [CrossRef]
15. Marchand, J.; Shetgaonkar, A.; Rueda Torres, J.L.; Lekic, A.; Palensky, P. EMT Real-Time Simulation Model of a 2 GW Offshore
Renewable Energy Hub Integrating Electrolysers. Energies 2021, 14, 8547. [CrossRef]
16. Himri, Y.; Rehman, S.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Himri, S.; Mellit, A.; Merzouk, M.; Merzouk, N.K. Overview of the Role of Energy
Resources in Algeria’s Energy Transition. Energies 2022, 15, 4731. [CrossRef]
17. Yu, Y.; Pham, T.D.; Shin, H.; Ha, K. Study on the Motion Characteristics of 10 MW Superconducting Floating Offshore Wind
Turbine Considering 2nd Order Wave Effect. Energies 2021, 14, 6070. [CrossRef]
18. Baba, Y.; Pandyaswargo, A.H.; Onoda, H. An Analysis of the Current Status of Woody Biomass Gasification Power Generation in
Japan. Energies 2020, 13, 4903. [CrossRef]
19. Battista, F.; Frison, N.; Bolzonella, D. Energy and Nutrients’ Recovery in Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Biomass: An Italian
Perspective for Future Applications. Energies 2019, 12, 3287. [CrossRef]
20. Garduño-Ruiz, E.P.; Silva, R.; Rodríguez-Cueto, Y.; García-Huante, A.; Olmedo-González, J.; Martínez, M.L.; Wojtarowski, A.;
Martell-Dubois, R.; Cerdeira-Estrada, S. Criteria for Optimal Site Selection for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Plants
in Mexico. Energies 2021, 14, 2121. [CrossRef]
21. Ng, K.-W.; Lam, W.-H.; Ng, K.-C. 10 Years of Research Progress in Horizontal-Axis Marine Current Turbines. Energies 2013, 6,
1497–1526. [CrossRef]
22. Kumar, B.R. Case 16: Three Gorges Dam—The World’s Largest Hydroelectric Plant. In Project Finance; Springer: Cham,
Switzerland, 2022; pp. 183–186. [CrossRef]
23. ENERGY|ITAIPU BINACIONAL. Available online: https://www.itaipu.gov.br/en/energy/energy (accessed on 9 January 2023).
24. Kumar, B.R. Case 21: Bhadla Solar Park. In Project Finance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 205–208. [CrossRef]
25. Yang, Z.; Liu, P.; Cheng, L.; Liu, D.; Ming, B.; Li, H.; Xia, Q. Sizing utility-scale photovoltaic power generation for integration into a
hydropower plant considering the effects of climate change: A case study in the Longyangxia of China. Energy 2021, 236, 121519.
[CrossRef]
26. Khaldia, B.; Sadji, F.; Riadh, B. China Experience in Renewable Energies. J. Manag. Econ. Sci. Prospect 2022, 06, 700–718.
27. Wang, H.Y.; Chen, B.; Pan, D.; Lv, Z.-A.; Huang, S.-Q.; Khayatnezhad, M.; Jimenez, G. Optimal wind energy generation
considering climatic variables by Deep Belief network (DBN) model based on modified coot optimization algorithm (MCOA).
Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102744. [CrossRef]
28. Haidi, T.; Cheddadi, B. State of Wind Energy in the World: Evolution, Impacts and Perspectives. Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng.
2022, 41, 347–352. Available online: https://www.iotpe.com (accessed on 9 January 2023).
29. Sutcu, M.; Yasin Güner, F.; Duran, R.; Söylemez, İ. Decision Making of Suitable Bioenergy Power Plant Location: A Case Study.
ACSIS 2020, 24, 11–14. [CrossRef]
30. OPET-Organisations for the Promotion of Energy Technologies. The World´s Largest Biofuel CHP Plant Alholmens Kraft,
Pietarsaari. Available online: https://www.tekes.fi/opet/ (accessed on 9 January 2023).
31. Abbas, T.; Issa, M.; Ilinca, A.; El-Ali, A. Biomass Combined Heat and Power Generation for Anticosti Island: A Case Study.
J. Power Energy Eng. 2020, 8, 64–87. [CrossRef]
32. Simla, T.; Stanek, W. Influence of the wind energy sector on thermal power plants in the Polish energy system. Renew. Energy
2020, 161, 928–938. [CrossRef]
33. Awuku, S.A.; Bennadji, A.; Muhammad-Sukki, F.; Sellami, N. Promoting the Solar Industry in Ghana through Effective Public-
Private Partnership (PPP): Some Lessons from South Africa and Morocco. Energies 2021, 15, 17. [CrossRef]
34. Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System|Concentrating Solar Power Projects|NREL. Available online: https://solarpaces.nrel.
gov/project/ivanpah-solar-electric-generating-system (accessed on 9 January 2023).
35. Mojave Solar Project|Concentrating Solar Power Projects|NREL. Available online: https://solarpaces.nrel.gov/project/mojave-
solar-project (accessed on 9 January 2023).
36. Nair, D.R.; Nair, M.G.; Thakur, T. A Smart Microgrid System with Artificial Intelligence for Power-Sharing and Power Quality
Improvement. Energies 2022, 15, 5409. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 22 of 26
37. Rezk, H.; Alamri, B.; Aly, M.; Fathy, A.; Olabi, A.G.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Ziedan, H.A. Multicriteria Decision-Making to Determine
the Optimal Energy Management Strategy of Hybrid PV–Diesel Battery-Based Desalination System. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4202.
[CrossRef]
38. Kaushik, E.; Prakash, V.; Mahela, O.P.; Khan, B.; El-Shahat, A.; Abdelaziz, A.Y. Comprehensive Overview of Power System
Flexibility during the Scenario of High Penetration of Renewable Energy in Utility Grid. Energies 2022, 15, 516. [CrossRef]
39. Impram, S.; Varbak Nese, S.; Oral, B. Challenges of renewable energy penetration on power system flexibility: A survey. Energy
Strategy Rev. 2020, 31, 100539. [CrossRef]
40. Sadeghi, H.; Rashidinejad, M.; Abdollahi, A. A comprehensive sequential review study through the generation expansion
planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 1369–1394. [CrossRef]
41. Hajian, H.; Simson, R.; Kurnitski, J. Heating Sizing Power Reduction in Buildings Connected to District Heating with Dynamically
Controlled DHW Setback and Flow Limiters. Energies 2022, 15, 5278. [CrossRef]
42. Nasr Esfahani, F.; Darwish, A.; Williams, B.W. Power Converter Topologies for Grid-Tied Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Powered
Electric Vehicles (EVs)—A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2022, 15, 4648. [CrossRef]
43. Maghrabie, H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Al-Alami, A.H.; Ramadan, M.; Mushtaha, E.; Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G. State-of-the-Art
Technologies for Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Systems. Buildings 2021, 11, 383. [CrossRef]
44. Sonawane, C.R.; Panchal, H.N.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Ghasemi, M.H.; Alrubaie, A.J.; Sohani, A. Bibliometric Analysis of Solar
Desalination Systems Powered by Solar Energy and CFD Modelled. Energies 2022, 15, 5279. [CrossRef]
45. Muna, Y.B.; Kuo, C.-C. Feasibility and Techno-Economic Analysis of Electric Vehicle Charging of PV/Wind/Diesel/Battery
Hybrid Energy System with Different Battery Technology. Energies 2022, 15, 4364. [CrossRef]
46. Ndukwu, M.C.; Ibeh, M.; Ekop, I.; Abada, U.; Etim, P.; Bennamoun, L.; Abam, F.; Simo-Tagne, M.; Gupta, A. Analysis of the Heat
Transfer Coefficient, Thermal Effusivity and Mathematical Modelling of Drying Kinetics of a Partitioned Single Pass Low-Cost
Solar Drying of Cocoyam Chips with Economic Assessments. Energies 2022, 15, 4457. [CrossRef]
47. Sunny, F.A.; Fu, L.; Rahman, M.S.; Huang, Z. Determinants and Impact of Solar Irrigation Facility (SIF) Adoption: A Case Study
in Northern Bangladesh. Energies 2022, 15, 2460. [CrossRef]
48. Zhang, H.L.; Baeyens, J.; Degrève, J.; Cacères, G. Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22, 466–481. [CrossRef]
49. Technology Roadmap—Concentrating Solar Power. Available online: https://www.iea.org/about/copyright.asp (accessed on 14
November 2022).
50. Ahmadi, M.H.; Ghazvini, M.; Sadeghzadeh, M.; Nazari, M.A.; Kumar, R.; Naeimi, A.; Ming, T. Solar power technology for
electricity generation: A critical review. Energy Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 340–361. [CrossRef]
51. Desideri, U.; Zepparelli, F.; Morettini, V.; Garroni, E. Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic
technologies: Technical and environmental evaluations. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 765–784. [CrossRef]
52. Gamarra, A.R.; Banacloche, S.; Lechon, Y.; del Río, P. Assessing the sustainability impacts of concentrated solar power deployment
in Europe in the context of global value chains. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 171, 113004. [CrossRef]
53. Hansen, K.; Vad Mathiesen, B. Comprehensive assessment of the role and potential for solar thermal in future energy systems.
Sol. Energy 2018, 169, 144–152. [CrossRef]
54. Lambrecht, M.; de Miguel, M.T.; Lasanta, M.I.; Pérez, F.J. Past research and future strategies for molten chlorides application in
concentrated solar power technology. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 237, 111557. [CrossRef]
55. Montenon, A.C.; Meligy, R. Control Strategies Applied to a Heat Transfer Loop of a Linear Fresnel Collector. Energies 2022, 15, 3338.
[CrossRef]
56. Leonardi, M.; Corso, R.; Milazzo, R.G.; Connelli, C.; Foti, M.; Gerardi, C.; Bizzarri, F.; Privitera, S.M.S.; Lombardo, S.A. The Effects
of Module Temperature on the Energy Yield of Bifacial Photovoltaics: Data and Model. Energies 2021, 15, 22. [CrossRef]
57. Vance, D.; Razban, A.; Schubert, P.; Weissbach, R. Investigation into Sizing Photovoltaic with Energy Storage for Off-Grid
Transactive Scenarios. Energies 2021, 14, 1062. [CrossRef]
58. Anani, N.; Ibrahim, H. Performance Evaluation of Analytical Methods for Parameters Extraction of Photovoltaic Generators.
Energies 2020, 13, 4825. [CrossRef]
59. Mohamed, A.S.A.; Maghrabie, H.M. Techno-economic feasibility analysis of Benban solar Park. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 12593–12607.
[CrossRef]
60. World’s Largest Standalone Solar Power Plant|Noor Abu Dhabi. Available online: https://noorabudhabi.ae/ (accessed on 10
January 2023).
61. Noor Energy—The largest single-site concentrated solar power plant in the world. Available online: http://noorenergy.ae/
(accessed on 10 January 2023).
62. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Salameh, T.; Sayed, E.T.; Husain, K.S.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Selection Guidelines for Wind
Energy Technologies. Energies 2021, 14, 3244. [CrossRef]
63. Hansen, L.H.; Madsen, P.H.; Blaabjerg, F.; Christensen, H.C.; Lindhard, U.; Eskildsen, K. Generators and power electronics
technology for wind turbines. In Proceedings of the IECON’01. 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society,
Denver, CO, USA, 29 November–2 December 2001; pp. 2000–2005. [CrossRef]
64. Kumar, Y.; Ringenberg, J.; Depuru, S.S.; Devabhaktuni, V.K.; Lee, J.W.; Nikolaidis, E.; Andersen, B.; Afjeh, A. Wind energy: Trends
and enabling technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 209–224. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 23 of 26
65. Riegler, H. HAWT versus VAWT: Small VAWTs find a clear niche. Refocus 2003, 4, 44–46. [CrossRef]
66. Hossain, S. Comparative Study on Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines and Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Bachelor Thesis, World
University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351233790
(accessed on 7 January 2023).
67. USEPA; OW; OWM; WID; SCIB. United States Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Energy Fact Sheet: Wind Turbines; EPA:
Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
68. Rostami, A.B.; Armandei, M. Renewable energy harvesting by vortex-induced motions: Review and benchmarking of technologies.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 70, 193–214. [CrossRef]
69. Bahadur, I. Dynamic Modeling and Investigation of a Tunable Vortex Bladeless Wind Turbine. Energies 2022, 15, 6773. [CrossRef]
70. Manshadi, M.D.; Ghassemi, M.; Mousavi, S.M.; Mosavi, A.H.; Kovacs, L. Predicting the Parameters of Vortex Bladeless Wind
Turbine Using Deep Learning Method of Long Short-Term Memory. Energies 2021, 14, 4867. [CrossRef]
71. Francis, S.; Umesh, V.; Shivakumar, S. Design and Analysis of Vortex Bladeless Wind Turbine. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47,
5584–5588. [CrossRef]
72. Thakre, M.; Aher, S.; Chavan, P.; Deshmukh, R.; Pawar, V.; Patil, J. Architecture, Advancement and Assessment of a Bladeless
Wind Solar Hybrid System in Comparison to a Traditional Hybrid Solar System. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [CrossRef]
73. Li, Y.; Chi, Y.; Wang, X.; Tian, X.; Jianqing, J. Practices and Challenge on Planning with Large-scale Renewable Energy Grid
Integration. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration: Ubiquitous
Energy Network Connecting Everything, EI2 2019, Changsha, China, 8–10 November 2019; pp. 118–121. [CrossRef]
74. Hatkar, A.A. Harnessing Wind Energy. resmilitaris 2022, 12, 380–400. Available online: https://resmilitaris.net/menu-script/
index.php/resmilitaris/article/view/2223 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
75. Zhang, W.; Tong, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, L.; Ou, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Zhu, Y. Emission of Metals from Pelletized and Uncompressed
Biomass Fuels Combustion in Rural Household Stoves in China. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Contreras-Trejo, J.C.; Vega-Nieva, D.J.; Heya, M.N.; Prieto-Ruíz, J.A.; Nava-Berúmen, C.A.; Carrillo-Parra, A. Sintering and
Fusibility Risks of Pellet Ash from Different Sources at Different Combustion Temperatures. Energies 2022, 15, 5026. [CrossRef]
77. Xu, M.; Sheng, C. Modeling the Process and Properties of Ash Formation during Pulverized Biomass Combustion. Energies 2022,
15, 4417. [CrossRef]
78. Banerjee, A.; Calay, R.K.; Mustafa, M. Review on Material and Design of Anode for Microbial Fuel Cell. Energies 2022, 15, 2283.
[CrossRef]
79. Sayed, E.T.; Alawadhi, H.; Elsaid, K.; Olabi, A.G.; Adel Almakrani, M.; Bin Tamim, S.T.; Alafranji, G.H.M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. A
Carbon-Cloth Anode Electroplated with Iron Nanostructure for Microbial Fuel Cell Operated with Real Wastewater. Sustainability
2020, 12, 6538. [CrossRef]
80. Pham, T.N.T.; Yoon, Y.S. Development of Nanosized Mn3 O4 -Co3 O4 on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Cathode Catalyst in
Urea Fuel Cell. Energies 2020, 13, 2322. [CrossRef]
81. Rizal, T.A.; Khairil, M.; Husin, H.; Nasution, F.; Umar, H. The Experimental Study of Pangium Edule Biodiesel in a High-Speed
Diesel Generator for Biopower Electricity. Energies 2022, 15, 5405. [CrossRef]
82. Borowiak, D.; Krzywonos, M. Bioenergy, Biofuels, Lipids and Pigments—Research Trends in the Use of Microalgae Grown in
Photobioreactors. Energies 2022, 15, 5357. [CrossRef]
83. Yang, N.; Deng, X.; Liu, B.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Tang, M.; Wu, L. Combustion Performance and Emission Characteristics of Marine
Engine Burning with Different Biodiesel. Energies 2022, 15, 5177. [CrossRef]
84. Sait, H.H.; Hussain, A.; Bassyouni, M.; Ali, I.; Kanthasamy, R.; Ayodele, B.V.; Elhenawy, Y. Hydrogen-Rich Syngas and Biochar
Production by Non-Catalytic Valorization of Date Palm Seeds. Energies 2022, 15, 2727. [CrossRef]
85. Sieradzka, M.; Kirczuk, C.; Kalemba-Rec, I.; Mlonka-M˛edrala, A.; Magdziarz, A. Pyrolysis of Biomass Wastes into Carbon
Materials. Energies 2022, 15, 1941. [CrossRef]
86. Han, S.; Bai, L.; Chi, M.; Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yu, K. Conversion of Waste Corn Straw to Value-Added Fuel via Hydrothermal
Carbonization after Acid Washing. Energies 2022, 15, 1828. [CrossRef]
87. Kshatriya, A.S.; Tiwari, P.; M, S.; Yunus Khan, T.M.; Abdul Khadar, S.D.; Mansour, M.; M, F. Investigations into the Combined
Effect of Mahua Biodiesel Blends and Biogas in a Dual Fuel Engine. Energies 2022, 15, 2057. [CrossRef]
88. Kapłan, M.; Klimek, K.; Maj, G.; Zhuravel, D.; Bondar, A.; Lemeshchenko-Lagoda, V.; Boltianskyi, B.; Boltianska, L.; Syrotyuk, H.;
Syrotyuk, S.; et al. Method of Evaluation of Materials Wear of Cylinder-Piston Group of Diesel Engines in the Biodiesel Fuel
Environment. Energies 2022, 15, 3416. [CrossRef]
89. Lv, J.; Wang, S.; Meng, B. The Effects of Nano-Additives Added to Diesel-Biodiesel Fuel Blends on Combustion and Emission
Characteristics of Diesel Engine: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 1032. [CrossRef]
90. Thithai, V.; Jin, X.; Ajaz Ahmed, M.; Choi, J.-W. Physicochemical Properties of Activated Carbons Produced from Coffee Waste
and Empty Fruit Bunch by Chemical Activation Method. Energies 2021, 14, 3002. [CrossRef]
91. Diaz, C.A.; Shah, R.K.; Evans, T.; Trabold, T.A.; Draper, K. Thermoformed Containers Based on Starch and Starch/Coffee Waste
Biochar Composites. Energies 2020, 13, 6034. [CrossRef]
92. Choi, S.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Jeong, Y.W.; Han, S.Y.; Van Nguyen, Q. Simulation of the Fast Pyrolysis of Coffee Ground in a Tilted-Slide
Reactor. Energies 2020, 13, 6605. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 24 of 26
93. Choi, S.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Jeong, Y.W.; Han, S.Y.; Nguyen, Q. Characteristics of Flame Stability and Gaseous Emission of Bio-Crude
Oil from Coffee Ground in a Pilot-Scale Spray Burner. Energies 2020, 13, 2882. [CrossRef]
94. Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Bai, L.; Chi, M.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y. Low Temperature One-Pot Hydrothermal Carbonization of Corn Straw into
Hydrochar for Adsorbing Cadmium (II) in Wastewater. Energies 2021, 14, 8503. [CrossRef]
95. Jenkins, B.M.; Baxter, L.L.; Koppejan, J. Biomass Combustion. In Thermochemical Processing of Biomass: Conversion into Fuels,
Chemicals and Power; Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 49–83. [CrossRef]
96. Nickull, S. Europe’s largest cogeneration scheme based on biomass. VGB PowerTech 2002, 82, 62–65.
97. Zdiri, M.A.; Guesmi, T.; Alshammari, B.M.; Alqunun, K.; Almalaq, A.; Salem, F.B.; Hadj Abdallah, H.; Toumi, A. Design and
Analysis of Sliding-Mode Artificial Neural Network Control Strategy for Hybrid PV-Battery-Supercapacitor System. Energies
2022, 15, 4099. [CrossRef]
98. Belboul, Z.; Toual, B.; Kouzou, A.; Mokrani, L.; Bensalem, A.; Kennel, R.; Abdelrahem, M. Multiobjective Optimization of a Hybrid
PV/Wind/Battery/Diesel Generator System Integrated in Microgrid: A Case Study in Djelfa, Algeria. Energies 2022, 15, 3579.
[CrossRef]
99. Khan, M.J.; Kumar, D.; Narayan, Y.; Malik, H.; García Márquez, F.P.; Gómez Muñoz, C.Q. A Novel Artificial Intelligence Maximum
Power Point Tracking Technique for Integrated PV-WT-FC Frameworks. Energies 2022, 15, 3352. [CrossRef]
100. Singh, S.; Chauhan, P.; Singh, N.J. Capacity optimization of grid connected solar/fuel cell energy system using hybrid ABC-PSO
algorithm. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 10070–10088. [CrossRef]
101. Kim, J.-W.; Ahn, H.; Seo, H.C.; Lee, S.C. Optimization of Solar/Fuel Cell Hybrid Energy System Using the Combinatorial Dynamic
Encoding Algorithm for Searches (cDEAS). Energies 2022, 15, 2779. [CrossRef]
102. Bauer, R.; Schopf, D.; Klaus, G.; Brotsack, R.; Valdes, J. Energy Cell Simulation for Sector Coupling with Power-to-Methane: A
Case Study in Lower Bavaria. Energies 2022, 15, 2640. [CrossRef]
103. Gajewski, P.; Pieńkowski, K. Control of the Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Wind Turbine, Photovoltaic Panels and
Battery Energy Storage. Energies 2021, 14, 1595. [CrossRef]
104. Rashid, M.M.U.; Alotaibi, M.A.; Chowdhury, A.H.; Rahman, M.; Alam, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Abido, M.A. Home Energy
Management for Community Microgrids Using Optimal Power Sharing Algorithm. Energies 2021, 14, 1060. [CrossRef]
105. Papadopoulou, A.G.; Vasileiou, G.; Flamos, A. A Comparison of Dispatchable RES Technoeconomics: Is There a Niche for
Concentrated Solar Power? Energies 2020, 13, 4768. [CrossRef]
106. Come Zebra, E.I.; van der Windt, H.J.; Nhumaio, G.; Faaij, A.P.C. A Review of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Mini-Grids
for off-Grid Electrification in Developing Countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 144, 111036. [CrossRef]
107. Wind Solar Hybrid Project—Case Study|CleanMax. Available online: https://www.cleanmax.com/case-studies/case-study-
wind-solar-hybrid.php (accessed on 11 January 2023).
108. International Renewable Energy Agency. About IRENA. In Renewable Energy Statistics 2022. Statistiques D’énergie Renouvelable
2022. Estadísticas de Energía Renovable 2022; IRENA: Masdar, United Arab Emirates, 2022. Available online: https://www.irena.org
(accessed on 26 December 2022).
109. Akinyele, D.O.; Rayudu, R.K. Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable power networks. Sustain. Energy Technol.
Assess. 2014, 8, 74–91. [CrossRef]
110. Ai, W.; Zhang, C.; Xia, L.; Miao, H.; Yuan, J. Synthesis of High-Quality Two-Dimensional V2C MXene for Supercapacitor
Application. Energies 2022, 15, 3696. [CrossRef]
111. Tadesse, M.G.; Kasaw, E.; Fentahun, B.; Loghin, E.; Lübben, J.F. Banana Peel and Conductive Polymers-Based Flexible Superca-
pacitors for Energy Harvesting and Storage. Energies 2022, 15, 2471. [CrossRef]
112. Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Wilberforce, T.; Jamal, A.; Alami, A.H.; Elsaid, K.; Rahman, S.M.A.; Shah, S.K.; Abdelkareem, M.A.
Metal-Air Batteries—A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 7373. [CrossRef]
113. Wang, S.; Ren, P.; Takyi-Aninakwa, P.; Jin, S.; Fernandez, C. A Critical Review of Improved Deep Convolutional Neural Network
for Multi-Timescale State Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energies 2022, 15, 5053. [CrossRef]
114. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Ramadan, M. Critical Review of Flywheel Energy Storage System. Energies 2021,
14, 2159. [CrossRef]
115. Zhang, W.; Gu, X.; Zhang, L. Robust Controller Considering Road Disturbances for a Vehicular Flywheel Battery System. Energies
2022, 15, 5432. [CrossRef]
116. Yu, Q.; Tian, L.; Li, X.; Tan, X. Compressed Air Energy Storage Capacity Configuration and Economic Evaluation Considering the
Uncertainty of Wind Energy. Energies 2022, 15, 4637. [CrossRef]
117. Lin, Z.; Zuo, Z.; Li, W.; Sun, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, H.; Zhou, X. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Impeller Backside
Cavity in a Centrifugal Compressor for CAES. Energies 2022, 15, 420. [CrossRef]
118. Gao, X.; Wei, S.; Xia, C.; Li, Y. Flexible Operation of Concentrating Solar Power Plant with Thermal Energy Storage Based on a
Coordinated Control Strategy. Energies 2022, 15, 4929. [CrossRef]
119. Falcone, M.; Rehman, D.; Dongellini, M.; Naldi, C.; Pulvirenti, B.; Morini, G.L. Experimental Investigation on Latent Thermal
Energy Storages (LTESs) Based on Pure and Copper-Foam-Loaded PCMs. Energies 2022, 15, 4894. [CrossRef]
120. Alnaqbi, S.A.; Alasad, S.; Aljaghoub, H.; Alami, A.H.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Olabi, A.G. Applicability of Hydropower Generation
and Pumped Hydro Energy Storage in the Middle East and North Africa. Energies 2022, 15, 2412. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 25 of 26
121. Görtz, J.; Aouad, M.; Wieprecht, S.; Terheiden, K. Assessment of pumped hydropower energy storage potential along rivers and
shorelines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 165, 112027. [CrossRef]
122. Alami, A.H. Compressed-Air Energy Storage Systems, Mechanical Energy Storage for Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resources.
Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 67–85. [CrossRef]
123. Chukwuka, C.; Folly, K.A. Batteries and super-capacitors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society Conference and
Exposition in Africa: Intelligent Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Resources (PowerAfrica), Johannesburg, South Africa,
9–13 July 2012. [CrossRef]
124. Alami, A.H. Thermal Storage, Mechanical Energy Storage for Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resources. Advances in Science, Technology
and Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 27–34. [CrossRef]
125. Tarekegne, B.W.; O’Neil, R.S.; Michener, S.R. Energy Storage and Power Plant Decommissioning; Technical Report; US Department of
Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
126. Turley, B.; Cantor, A.; Berry, K.; Knuth, S.; Mulvaney, D.; Vineyard, N. Emergent landscapes of renewable energy storage:
Considering just transitions in the Western United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 90, 102583. [CrossRef]
127. Ekic, A.; Wu, D.; Jiang, J.N. Impact of Solar Inverter Dynamics during Grid Restoration Period on Protection Schemes Based on
Negative-Sequence Components. Energies 2022, 15, 4360. [CrossRef]
128. MA|Concentrating Solar Power Projects|NREL. Available online: https://solarpaces.nrel.gov/by-country/MA (accessed on 11
January 2023).
129. Pijarski, P.; Kacejko, P. Voltage Optimization in MV Network with Distributed Generation Using Power Consumption Control in
Electrolysis Installations. Energies 2021, 14, 993. [CrossRef]
130. Alonso-Travesset, À.; Martín, H.; Coronas, S.; Hoz, J. Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems:
A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 1932. [CrossRef]
131. Xue, Q.; Zhang, X.; Teng, T.; Zhang, J.; Feng, Z.; Lv, Q. A Comprehensive Review on Classification, Energy Management Strategy,
and Control Algorithm for Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Energies 2020, 13, 5355. [CrossRef]
132. Kanagaraj, N.; Rezk, H.; Gomaa, M.R. A Variable Fractional Order Fuzzy Logic Control Based MPPT Technique for Improving
Energy Conversion Efficiency of Thermoelectric Power Generator. Energies 2020, 13, 4531. [CrossRef]
133. Liu, Y.; Liang, J.; Song, J.; Ye, J. Research on Energy Management Strategy of Fuel Cell Vehicle Based on Multi-Dimensional
Dynamic Programming. Energies 2022, 15, 5190. [CrossRef]
134. Alves, M.P.; Gul, W.; Cimini, C.A., Jr.; Ha, S.K. A Review on Industrial Perspectives and Challenges on Material, Manufacturing,
Design and Development of Compressed Hydrogen Storage Tanks for the Transportation Sector. Energies 2022, 15, 5152. [CrossRef]
135. Samsun, R.C.; Rex, M.; Antoni, L.; Stolten, D. Deployment of Fuel Cell Vehicles and Hydrogen Refueling Station Infrastructure: A
Global Overview and Perspectives. Energies 2022, 15, 4975. [CrossRef]
136. Peloriadi, K.; Iliadis, P.; Boutikos, P.; Atsonios, K.; Grammelis, P.; Nikolopoulos, A. Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled
Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study. Energies 2022, 15, 3892. [CrossRef]
137. Sá, M.H.; Pinto, A.M.F.R.; Oliveira, V.B. Passive Small Direct Alcohol Fuel Cells for Low-Power Portable Applications: Assessment
Based on Innovative Increments since 2018. Energies 2022, 15, 3787.
138. Tiedemann, T.; Kroener, M.; Vehse, M.; Agert, C. Fuel Cell Electrical Vehicles as Mobile Coupled Heat and Power Backup-Plant in
Neighbourhoods. Energies 2022, 15, 2704. [CrossRef]
139. Felseghi, R.-A.; Carcadea, E.; Raboaca, M.S.; Trufin, C.N.; Filote, C. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology for the Sustainable Future of
Stationary Applications. Energies 2019, 12, 4593. [CrossRef]
140. Sutharssan, T.; Montalvao, D.; Chen, Y.K.; Wang, W.C.; Pisac, C.; Elemara, H. A review on prognostics and health monitoring of
proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 75, 440–450. [CrossRef]
141. Ijaodola, O.; Ogungbemi, E.; Khatib, F.N.; Wilberforce, T.; Ramadan, M.; El Hassan, Z.; Thompson, J.; Olabi, A.G. Evaluating
the Effect of Metal Bipolar Plate Coating on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Energies 2018, 11, 3203.
[CrossRef]
142. Pourrahmani, H.; Siavashi, M.; Yavarinasab, A.; Matian, M.; Chitgar, N.; Wang, L.; Van Herle, J. A Review on the Long-Term
Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: From Degradation Modeling to the Effects of Bipolar Plates, Sealings,
and Contaminants. Energies 2022, 15, 5081. [CrossRef]
143. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Alanazi, A.; Vichare, P.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Novel Trends in
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Energies 2022, 15, 4949. [CrossRef]
144. Kopteva, A.; Kalimullin, L.; Tcvetkov, P.; Soares, A. Prospects and Obstacles for Green Hydrogen Production in Russia. Energies
2021, 14, 718. [CrossRef]
145. Msheik, M.; Rodat, S.; Abanades, S. Methane Cracking for Hydrogen Production: A Review of Catalytic and Molten Media
Pyrolysis. Energies 2021, 14, 3107. [CrossRef]
Energies 2023, 16, 1415 26 of 26
146. Rodrigues, J.M. A Procedure to Calculate First-Order Wave-Structure Interaction Loads in Wave Farms and Other Multi-Body
Structures Subjected to Inhomogeneous Waves. Energies 2021, 14, 1761. [CrossRef]
147. Nemś, M. Experimental Determination of the Influence of Shape on the Heat Transfer Process in a Crushed Granite Storage Bed.
Energies 2020, 13, 6725. [CrossRef]
148. Park, C.; Kim, M. A Study on the Characteristics of Academic Topics Related to Renewable Energy Using the Structural Topic
Modeling and the Weak Signal Concept. Energies 2021, 14, 1497. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.