Summary

The participant was administered on a 20 year old girl. She was a healthy girl with appropriate weight and

height. The purpose of the test was to assess the development of participant’s verbal, motor, social,

cognitive and self-help adaptive skills. Test administration was consisted of participant’s reported

information and some tasks were also performed by the participant. The environment was kept calm and

peaceful. The result of the test showed below average performance of the participant in all areas and

above average in motor area, where the child was efficient than other areas.

Bio Data

Name Y. J

Age 20 years

Gender Female

Birth Order Second Born

Siblings IV

Education Graduation

Religion Islam

Socioeconomic status middle class

Informant Participant herself

Reason of Referral

The participant was referred to the psychological testing room of Gov.t Graduate College

Raiwind Lahore for academic purpose

Family History

The participant’s father was 48 years old. He had done Intermediate. He is a farmer by profession. He had

no physical illness but at certain times he got stressed. He was friendly with his family and friends but

sometimes he got angry when someone misbehaves with him. The participant had strong relationship with

her father. Her father passed away couple of years ago. She was more attached with his father than

mother.

The Participant’s mother was 50 years old. He had completed his education till middle standards and a

house wife. She had no physical and psychological illness but she had a short temperament and get stress

easily. The participants had a very friendly relationship with his mother.

The relationship between participant’s parents was reported to be moderately satisfactory.

The Participant had 3 brothers. Her elder brother was 23 years old. He was physical and psychological

illness. She cared for his elder brother with his mother and gets more attached with his brother than

others.

Her second brother who is younger from her was 18 years old. He had no physical and psychological

illness. He was studding in first year. The relationship between the participant and this one younger

brother is moderate.

Participant’s youngest brother was 16 years old. He was studding in matric. The relationship between

participant’s and youngest brother is good. They share their secrets with each other. The participant had

more harmonious relationship with her youngest brother than younger one.

General Home Environment

farm. The family system is separate. The general home environment was reported to be cooperative but

sometimes incompatible due to conflicts between the participant’s family members. The authoritative

figure in family is usually the participant’s mother. There was no physical or psychological hereditary

disease running in the family.

Personal History

The age of her father and mother was 23 and 25 respectively at the time of conception. Her mother

faces blood and vitamin deficiency during pregnancy. The participant was born through C-section at

hospital. There was no injury experienced by mother during pregnancy. Participant’s mother had not

faced any stressor from his family. Participant’s length of pregnancy was full term. At the time of birth

the participant was only 6.4 pound but he had no oxygen deficiency and crying immediately. Participant’s

color at the time of birth was fear. Participant faced some complications after birth but it was early and

properly treated by her physician.

Educational History

Participant had started her schooling from the age of 2.5 years. She had gone to a private school. In

beginning experience some difficulties as she had refused to go to school or started crying. Her started

days caused disrupted behaviors but she was good in studies and extra-curricular activities. Her

relationship with teachers was good. In started she had no friends but as the time passed she had probably

2 or 3 friends. Her relationship with friends was good but with other class members she was confused.

After schooling she had started her college at private college in the age of 15 years. The relationship with

peers and college mates was good. After college she had started her graduation in a Gov.t sector. Her

relationship with teachers and friends was satisfied able.

Sexual History
 Age of puberty was 13 years old. At that time client was little bit confused but as she already aware

about it so she handle herself. She had acknowledged about puberty because her mother told her already

so she handle herself.

Results

Quantitative Analysis:

Showing raw scores, percentile, grads, description of grades and time taken.

RAW PERCENTILE GRADE DESCRIPTION DESCRIPANCY TIME

SCORE RANK OF GRADE TAKEN

Above average

53 90 II In intellectual 0, 0, 1, 0, 1 30 min

Capacity

Qualitative analysis:-

The quantitative analysis of the test shows that the participant obtained a raw sore of 53. The

corresponding percentile was 90%. It shows that 89% people are below her and 10% people are above

her. Furthermore, the participant achieved the grade II, which indicates that she has above average

intellectual capabilities. Discrepancy analysis between obtained scores and expected scores on set A, B,

C, D, & E are 0, 0, 1, 0, and 1 respectively. The results show that the participant has above average

capacity for clear thinking and cognitive functioning. Her analogical reasoning also falls in above average

capacity.
Discussion:

As depicted through the analysis that the participant has scored 53 and falls in above average capacity of

intellectual capacity. This shows that she has good capacity for observation and clear thinking with

analogical reasoning. Moreover, she has good capacity to comprehend meaningless shapes, to make a

relation between them and following a pattern of reasoning. Her high scores are correlated with her

historical background.

Test Administration:

The test was administered in the testing lab of center for clinical psychology at the University of

the Punjab. The room was well illuminated. The participant was seated comfortably in front of the table.

The environment of the lab was little distracted as the other examiner and participant was also there for

test administration. After the required rapport build between the participant and the test taker, the test was

started. Proper instructions were given according to manual. An answer sheet, booklet and pencil were

given to her. She completes her task in 30 minutes.

Behavioral Observation:

The participant sat straight and was in pleasant mood at the start. She was well dressed and well

mannered. She listened to the instructions carefully with full attention. The only distraction was the noise

which was due to other participant and examiners. She was doing the test confidently without any anxiety.
Theory, although this test is not about intelligence but analogical reasoning directly relates with

intelligence. Her behavioral observation also proves her test results as she listen the instructions with full

attention.

Conclusion:

As the participant scored 53 and her corresponding percentile is 90%. It means that she is

performing above 89% of people and 10% of people are performing below. She has well developed

problem solving skills. She has good ability to extract information from one context and apply it to

another context. Analogical reasoning relates with cognitive functioning so the participant cognitive

abilities are above average.

Limitations and Suggestions:

• There are too many performance indicators.

• The performance information is too aggregated.

• There is not enough strategic information in the system.

• This test only measure reason by analogy that is not enough to find exact intelligence of a person.

The test only includes performance items. So, the WAIS test should be administered on the

participant to get better understanding of her intellectual including both verbal and performance

capacity.

• It causes too much internal competition.

The statistical analysis comprised two distinct statistical analysis of the investigated

associations. A conventional cohort analysis and a within-siblings analysis in which the association under

investigation was analysed with in siblings while keeping familial factors shared by siblings fixed. The

result showed that an appreciable part of the association of ig with educational and occupational

achievements could be attributed to familial factors shared by siblings. (Heglund etal 2019).