GWM HAVAL H6

AUS: MARCH 2021 - ONWARDS

NZ: MAY 2021 - ONWARDS
ALL VARIANTS

RATING YEAR 2022

VEHICLE TYPE Medium SUV
ENGINE TYPE Petrol + Hybrid
BUILT FROM February 2021
ON SALE FROM AUS: March 2021
NZ: May 2021
SERIES N/A
AIRBAGS Dual frontal, side chest,
side head, centre

The GWM Haval H6 was introduced in Australia from March 2021

and New Zealand in May 2021. This ANCAP safety rating applies
to all petrol and hybrid variants.
In order to confirm integrity of the battery and safety of high
voltage electrical systems in hybrid variants, additional frontal
offset (MPDB) and oblique pole tests were conducted. With these
additional tests, this ANCAP safety rating extends to all petrol and
hybrid variants of the GWM Haval H6.
Dual frontal, side chest-protecting and side head-protecting
(curtain) airbags are standard. A centre airbag which provides
added protection to front seat occupants in side impact crashes
is also standard.
Autonomous emergency braking (Car-to-Car, Vulnerable Road
User and Junction Assist) and a lane support system (LSS)
with lane keep assist (LKA), lane departure warning (LDW)
and emergency lane keeping (ELK), and an advanced speed
assistance system (SAS) are standard equipment.

90% 88% 73% 81%

ADULT OCCUPANT CHILD OCCUPANT VULNERABLE ROAD USER SAFETY
PROTECTION PROTECTION PROTECTION ASSIST

RATING APPLICABILITY

VARIANT BODY TYPE ENGINE DRIVETRAIN AUS NZ

GWM Haval H6 Premium 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 2WD  

GWM Haval H6 Lux  5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 2WD  
GWM Haval H6 Ultra 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 2WD  
GWM Haval H6 Ultra 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 4WD  
GWM Haval H6 GT Lux 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 2WD  
GWM Haval H6 GT Lux 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 4WD  
GWM Haval H6 GT Ultra 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 2WD  
GWM Haval H6 GT Ultra 5 door SUV 2.0 litre petrol 4WD  
GWM Haval H6 Hybrid Lux 5 door SUV 1.5 litre hybrid 2WD  
GWM Haval H6 Hybrid Ultra  5 door SUV 1.5 litre hybrid 2WD  

 COVERED BY THIS RATING  NOT COVERED BY THIS RATING  TESTED VARIANT - NOT APPLICABLE PAGE 1 OF 8
ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION
90%
34.22 POINTS
OUT OF 38
The passenger compartment of the GWM Haval H6 held its shape
well in the frontal offset (MPDB) test, however there were some
signs of loss of integrity around the footwell, which were penalised.
Penalties were also applied for possible hard contact points for the
driver’s knees. Dummy readings indicated MARGINAL protection
for the driver’s chest. With the deductions applied, protection for A Rescue Sheet, providing information for first responders in the
the upper legs was assessed as MARGINAL and for the driver’s event of a crash is available, and a multi-collision braking system
lower legs and feet ADEQUATE. Other body regions for the driver, is fitted.
and all regions for the passenger showed GOOD protection.
The front structure of the GWM Haval H6 presented a moderate
risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle in the MPDB test (which FRONTAL OFFSET (MPDB)# 5.13 (out of 8)
evaluates vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility), and a 1.26 point FULL WIDTH FRONTAL # 7.20 (out of 8)
penalty was applied.
SIDE IMPACT # 6.00 (out of 6)
In the full width frontal test, protection was MARGINAL for the neck
of the driver dummy, ADEQUATE for the neck and chest of the rear OBLIQUE POLE # 6.00 (out of 6)
passenger and GOOD for all other critical body regions.
WHIPLASH PROTECTION 4.00 (out of 4)
In the side impact test and the oblique pole test, protection offered
to all critical body regions was GOOD and the GWM Haval H6 FAR SIDE IMPACT 3.89 (out of 4)
scored maximum points in these tests.
RESCUE & EXTRICATION 2.00 (out of 2)
The vehicle is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against
occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impact crashes and
it provided GOOD protection for the head of both front seat #
Scaled scores. Total test scored out of 16.00 points.
occupants. Prevention of excursion (movement towards the other
side of the vehicle) in the far side impact tests was assessed as
ADEQUATE for both the vehicle-to-vehicle impact scenario and
the vehicle-to-pole scenario. SIDE IMPACT OBLIQUE POLE
SIDE IMPACT (MDB) (60km/h)
FRONTAL OFFSET (MPDB) (50km/h)
Head: 4.00 pts
DRIVER Chest: 4.00 pts
Head / neck: 4.00 pts Abdomen: 4.00 pts
Chest: 2.52 pts Pelvis: 4.00 pts
Upper legs: 2.00 pts Deductions: Nil
Lower legs: 3.00 pts
Deductions: -1.00 pts OBLIQUE POLE (32km/h)
(variable contact)
-1.00 pts Head: 4.00 pts
(concentrated load) Chest: 4.00 pts
-1.00 pts Abdomen: 4.00 pts
(footwell rupture) Pelvis: 4.00 pts
Deductions: Nil
FRONT PASSENGER
Head / neck: 4.00 pts
Chest: 4.00 pts FAR SIDE IMPACT
Upper legs: 4.00 pts
Lower legs: 4.00 pts SIDE IMPACT (MDB)
Deductions: Nil
Head: 4.00 pts
COMPATIBILITY Neck: 3.34 pts
Chest & Abdomen: 4.00 pts
Deductions: -1.26 pts Pelvis: No penalty

FULL WIDTH FRONTAL (50km/h) OBLIQUE POLE

Head: 4.00 pts
DRIVER Neck: 4.00 pts
Chest & Abdomen: 4.00 pts
Head: 4.00 pts Pelvis: No penalty
Neck: 1.35 pts
Chest: 4.00 pts
Upper legs: 4.00 pts OCCUPANT-TO-OCCUPANT
Deductions: Nil Head contact: No penalty

REAR PASSENGER
Head: 4.00 pts
Neck: 3.74 pts
Chest: 3.70 pts
Upper legs: 4.00 pts
Deductions: Nil

RESCUE & EXTRICATION WHIPLASH (REAR IMPACT) PROTECTION

Rescue Sheet No penalty Driver / front passenger: 3.00 pts


Rear passenger: 1.00 pts
Door Opening / Extrication  No penalty
Multi-Collision Braking  1.00 pt
Advanced eCall  1.00 pt default
CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION
88%
43.55 POINTS
OUT OF 49

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings indicated GOOD

protection for all critical body areas of both child dummies, apart
from the neck of the 10 year dummy where protection was rated DYNAMIC TEST (FRONT) 15.74 (out of 16)
as ADEQUATE.
DYNAMIC TEST (SIDE) 8.00 (out of 8)
In the side impact test, protection was GOOD and maximum points
were scored. RESTRAINT INSTALLATION 11.81 (out of 12)

The GWM Haval H6 is fitted with lower ISOFix anchorages on the ON-BOARD SAFETY FEATURES 8.00 (out of 13)
rear outboard seats and top tether anchorages for all rear seating
positions.
Installation of typical child restraints available in Australia and New
Zealand showed most child restraints could be accommodated in
most rear seating positions, though one of the selected booster
seats could not be correctly installed in the centre rear seating
position.

FRONTAL OFFSET (MPDB) (50km/h) SIDE IMPACT (60km/h)

6 YEAR OLD 10 YEAR OLD 10 YEAR OLD 6 YEAR OLD

ON-BOARD SAFETY FEATURES

FRONT 2nd ROW 2nd ROW 3rd ROW 3rd ROW

FEATURE PASSENGER OUTBOARD CENTRE OUTBOARD CENTRE

ISOFix    - -
Integrated child restraints    - -
Top tether anchorage    - -
Airbag disabling  - - - -

 FITTED TO TEST CAR AS STANDARD  NOT FITTED TO TEST CAR BUT AVAILABLE AS AN OPTION  NOT AVAILABLE - NOT APPLICABLE

GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR

NOTE: The child restraints fitted to vehicles tested by Euro NCAP

are relevant to the European market. For Australasian consumers,
this information should be used as a guide to vehicle features only.
The Child Restraint Evaluation Program (CREP) provides an
independent assessment on the safety of Australasian child restraints -
see www.childcarseats.com.au. PAGE 3 OF 8
CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION
88%
43.55 POINTS
OUT OF 49

CHILD RESTRAINT INSTALLATION*

FRONT ROW 2nd ROW 3rd ROW

CHILD RESTRAINT (CRS) TYPE^
PASSENGER LEFT CENTRE RIGHT LEFT CENTRE RIGHT
Rearward facing capsule     - - -
TYPE A Rearward facing with harness - convertible (Model A)     - - -
Rearward facing with harness - convertible (Model B)     - - -
BELTED

Forward facing with harness - convertible (Model A)     - - -

TYPE B
Forward facing with harness - convertible (Model B)     - - -
TYPE E Booster - 4 to 8 years     - - -
TYPE F Booster - 4 to 10 years     - - -
Rearward facing capsule   -  - - -
TYPE A Rearward facing with harness - convertible (Model A)   -  - - -
ISOFIX

Rearward facing with harness - convertible (Model B)   -  - - -

Forward facing with harness - convertible (Model A)   -  - - -
TYPE B
Forward facing with harness - convertible (Model B)   -  - - -

* Installation of each child restraint is assessed separately in each position. Installation of multiple restraints has not been assessed and may not be possible.
^ The above list of child restraints has been selected to provide a general indication of the rated vehicle’s ability to accommodate various CRS types. ANCAP does
not endorse or recommend any one CRS brand or model, nor does it rate the safety of child restraints.

 INSTALL WITHOUT PROBLEM  INSTALL WITH CARE  CANNOT BE FITTED SAFELY  INSTALLATION NOT ALLOWED - NOT APPLICABLE / NOT ASSESSED

PAGE 4 OF 8
VULNERABLE ROAD USER PROTECTION
73%
39.45 POINTS
OUT OF 54

The bonnet of the GWM Haval H6 provided GOOD or ADEQUATE

protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of its surface,
with WEAK and POOR results recorded on the stiff windscreen HEAD IMPACTS 16.57 (out of 24)
pillars and front edge of the bonnet surface. Protection of the
pelvis was mixed, with areas of GOOD and POOR performance, UPPER LEG IMPACTS 3.79 (out of 6)
while the bumper provided GOOD protection to pedestrians’ legs.
LOWER LEG IMPACTS 6.00 (out of 6)
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system is capable
of detecting and reacting to pedestrians and cyclists. Test of AEB - Pedestrian (forward) 5.35 (out of 7)
this system showed ADEQUATE performance in pedestrian test
scenarios, including when the vehicle is turning (junction). The
AEB - Pedestrian (backover) 0.00 (out of 2)
vehicle is fitted with a system that can prevent impacts with AEB - Cyclist 7.74 (out of 9)
pedestrians while reversing, however this system did not perform
well in ANCAP’s tests and was rated as POOR. In cyclist test
scenarios, the AEB system offered GOOD performance. The
system’s overall performance was classified as ADEQUATE.

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING (PEDESTRIAN, CYCLIST & BACKOVER)

SYSTEM NAME: Pedestrian Safety Assist
TYPE: Autonomous emergency braking with forward collision warning
OPERATIONAL FROM: 5-85 km/h
DESCRIPTION: System functions in the daytime and night

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING - PEDESTRIAN

AEB + FCW FORWARD BACKOVER
Adult crossing Adult walking Adult standing
Adult walking Adult crossing Adult crossing Adult crossing Child running side road, behind reversing behind reversing
along road towards kerb (50%) from kerb (25%) from kerb (75%) (obstructed) vehicle turning vehicle vehicle
DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY DAY

TEST
SCENARIO

- - -
PERFORMANCE
ADEQUATE

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING - CYCLIST PEDESTRIAN IMPACT

TEST (40 KM/H)
FCW FORWARD

Cyclist travelling Cyclist crossing Cyclist travelling Cyclist crossing Cyclist crossing
along road (25%) from kerb (obstructed) along road (50%) (nearside) (farside)

DAY DAY DAY DAY DAY

TEST
SCENARIO

PERFORMANCE
GOOD

GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR NOT TESTED

PAGE 5 OF 8
SAFETY ASSIST
81%
13.06 POINTS
OUT OF 16

The GWM Haval H6 is fitted with autonomous emergency braking

(AEB), a lane support system (LSS) with lane keep assist (LKA)
and emergency lane keeping (ELK) functionality, and blind spot OCCUPANT STATUS
monitoring (BSM).
- Seat belt reminders 2.00 (out of 2)
Tests of the AEB (Car-to-Car) system showed GOOD performance,
with collisions avoided or mitigated in all scenarios, including AEB - Driver monitoring 1.00 (out of 1)
Junction Assist where the test vehicle can autonomously brake to
avoid crashes when turning across the path of an oncoming vehicle. SPEED ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS 0.90 (out of 3)

Tests of LSS functionality showed GOOD performance in lane keep LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 4.00 (out of 4)
assist scenarios, and GOOD performance in the more critical ELK AEB - Car-to-Car 3.16 (out of 4)
scenarios with overall performance classified as GOOD.
A speed assistance system (SAS) with speed limit information
AEB - Junction Assist 2.00 (out of 2)
function (SLIF) is standard equipment.
A seatbelt reminder system with occupancy detection is fitted to all
seating positions. A driver drowsiness monitor system is fitted as
standard.

LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS (LSS)

SYSTEM NAME: Lane Assist system

OPERATIONAL FROM: 60-140 km/h

EMERGENCY LANE KEEPING (ELK)

Oncoming Overtaking vehicle Overtaking vehicle Road edge Solid line
vehicle (GVT at 72 km/h) (GVT at 80 km/h)

UNINTENTIONAL INTENTIONAL UNINTENTIONAL INTENTIONAL

TEST
SCENARIO

PERFORMANCE
GOOD

LANE KEEP ASSIST (LKA)

Dashed Line Solid Line

TEST
SCENARIO

PERFORMANCE
GOOD

HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) STANDARD
FUNCTION
Blind Spot Monitoring (BSM) PASS

GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR NOT TESTED

PAGE 6 OF 8
SAFETY ASSIST
81%
13.06 POINTS
OUT OF 16

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING (CAR-TO-CAR)

SYSTEM NAME: Crash Safety Assist

TYPE: Autonomous emergency braking with forward collision warning
OPERATIONAL FROM: 5-150 km/h
DESCRIPTION: Defaults ON for every journey

HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI)

Supplementary warning [NOT FITTED]
FUNCTION
Restraint activation / dynamic retractors [NOT FITTED]

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING

AUTONOMOUS - CAR-TO-CAR
EMERGENCY BRAKING - CAR-TO-CAR
Driving towards a stationary car Turning across the path of oncoming vehicle
-50% OFFSET -75% OFFSET 100% OFFSET 75% OFFSET 50% OFFSET TARGET VEHICLE SPEED

30 KM/H 45 KM/H 55 KM/H

TEST
10 KM/H
SCENARIO
TEST
VEHICLE 15 KM/H
SPEED

20 KM/H

AEB (10-50 km/h) GOOD

FCW (30-80 km/h)

PERFORMANCE GOOD

AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING - CAR-TO-CAR

Toward car braking lightly Toward car braking heavily
Driving towards a slower moving car*
12m 40m 12m 40m
HEADWAY HEADWAY HEADWAY HEADWAY

TEST
SCENARIO

AEB (10-50 km/h)

FCW (50*-80 km/h)

PERFORMANCE GOOD

OCCUPANT STATUS SPEED ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS (SAS)

WARNING TYPE DRIVER FRONT REAR SAS FEATURE DESCRIPTION

PASSENGER PASSENGERS

Speed Limit Information Function Camera based

Occupant Detection -  
Speed Limitation Function System advised
Seat Belt Reminder (Visual)   
Seat Belt Reminder (Audible)   
Driver Monitoring  - -

 PASS  FAIL  NOT AVAILABLE - NOT APPLICABLE

GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR NOT TESTED

PAGE 7 OF 8
SAFETY FEATURES & TECHNOLOGIES

AVAILABILITY TESTED MAKE / MODEL GWM Haval H6 RHD

FEATURE / TECHNOLOGY~ TESTED VEHICLE(S) BUILT 2021
AUS NZ
TESTED BODY TYPE Medium SUV
Seat belts (three-point) for all forward-facing seats  
TESTED VEHICLE ENGINE 2.0 litre petrol +
Seat belt pre-tensioners (front)   1.5 litre hybrid
Seat belt pre-tensioners (rear outboard) - 2nd row  
RATING PUBLISHED March 2022
Seat belt pre-tensioners (rear centre) - 2nd row  
RATING UPDATED June 2022
Seat belt pre-tensioners (rear outboard) - 3rd row - -
Intelligent seat belt reminder (driver)  
Intelligent seat belt reminder (front passenger)  
Intelligent seat belt reminder (2nd row seats)  
Intelligent seat belt reminder (3rd row seats) - -
Airbag - frontal (driver)  
Airbag - frontal (passenger)  
Airbags - side, chest protection (front seats)  
Airbags - side, chest protection (2nd row seats)  
Airbags - side, chest protection (3rd row seats) - -
Airbags - side, head protection (front seats)  
Airbags - side, head protection (2nd row seats)  
Airbags - side, head protection (3rd row seats) - -
Airbag - centre  
Airbag - knee (driver)  
Airbag - knee (front passenger)  
Airbag disabling switch - automatic (front passenger)  
Airbag disabling switch - manual (front passenger)  
Head restraints for all seats  
Active bonnet  
Adaptive cruise control (ACC)  
Anti-lock braking system (ABS)  
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - Car-to-Car  
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - VRU  
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - Backover  
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - Junction Assist  
Automatic emergency call (eCall)  
Blind spot monitor (BSM)  
Child presence alert  
Electronic brakeforce distribution (EBD)  
Event data recorder (EDR)  
Electronic stability control (ESC)  
Emergency brake assist (EBA)  
Emergency stop signal (ESS)  
Fatigue reminder  
Fatigue monitor / detection  
Forward collision warning (FCW)  
ISOFix  
Lane departure warning (LDW)  
Lane keep assist (LKA)   MODEL VARIANTS:
Pre-crash systems   ANCAP safety ratings do not automatically extend to variants that have
Rear cross-traffic alert (RCTA)   different body styles, engine configurations, driven wheels or occupant
restraint systems (e.g. fewer airbags). In these cases, ANCAP considers
Reversing collision avoidance (camera)   technical evidence submitted by manufacturers before deciding on the
extension of a rating to additional variants of a model.
Roll stability system  
Secondary / multi-collision brake   RATING YEAR (DATESTAMP):
Speed assistance - auto / intelligent speed limiter The Rating Year denotes the year requirements against which a vehicle has
  been assessed. The Rating Year is determined by ANCAP and, for vehicles
Speed assistance - manual speed limiter   rated from 2018, the Rating Year is the year in which the vehicle was tested.
Speed assistance - speed sign recognition & warning   ~ Specifications & availability subject to change. Please check with the
Smart (intelligent) key   vehicle manufacturer for confirmation of vehicle specification.
Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication (V2I)  
Vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V)  
 STANDARD  OPTIONAL  NOT AVAILABLE
 NOT AVAILABLE ON BASE VARIANT BUT STANDARD OR OPTIONAL ON HIGHER VARIANTS

PAGE 8 OF 8