Rethinking The Cost Estimating Process Through 5D BIM A Case Study 1

Construction Research Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012 778
Rethinking the Cost Estimating Process through 5D BIM: a Case Study
Daniel FORGUES1 Ivanka IORDANOVA2, Fernando VALDIVESIO3 and Sheryl

STAUB-FRENCH4
1
Department of Construction Engineering, Ecole de technologie supérieure Montreal,
Canada, 1100 Notre-Dame West Montreal, Canada, H3C 1K3; PH 514-396-8668;
email: [email protected]
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Purdue University Libraries on 11/18/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
2
3
4
Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia; 6250 Applied
Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4; PH 604-827-5118; email:
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a comparative study of commercially available BIM-
based estimating software, and an investigation of the changes in work practices and
workflows incurred by the adoption of such software by a construction company. Due
to the fragmentation of the construction industry and the linearity of the design
process, cost estimating is typically performed at a time when the conceptual design
is quite advanced or even completed, which is much too late in the design process to
help the different stakeholders make informed decisions. Performing value
engineering and cost estimation from the beginning of the design process would
potentially enable a faster and more cost-effective project delivery process, higher
quality buildings, and increased control and predictability for the owner. This
research examines the changes in work practices and work flows within a
construction company as they move towards adopting Building information Model
(BIM) estimating process. To conduct this research, we: (1) tested several BIM-
based cost estimating software tools to support different phases of design, (2)
evaluated the benefits and challenges of working with this software, and (3) analyzed
the work practices and workflows of a BIM-based estimating process within the firm.
Finally, we propose a multi-stage technology adoption scenario.
BACKGROUND
Due to the fragmentation of the construction industry and the linearity of the
design process, cost estimating is typically performed at a time when the conceptual
design is quite advanced or even completed, which is much too late in the design
process to help the different stakeholders make informed decisions. Oftentimes, this
cost feedback highlights potential budget concerns and a cost engineering process
will be performed to reduce construction costs, often at the expense of building
performance and construction quality. Performing value engineering and cost
estimating from the beginning of the design process would potentially enable a faster
Construction Research Congress 2012

and more cost-effective project delivery process, higher quality buildings, and
increased control and predictability for the owner. Although BIM-based cost
estimating tools have been available for some time, only a handful of large
construction firms have been able to fully leverage this functionality.
Nowadays, the AEC (Architecture-Engineering and Construction) industry is
facing a technological change represented by the transition from CAD-based
(Computer Aided Design) documentation to BIM (Building Information Modeling).
Unlike the CAD drawings which were limited in information, BIM opens an
expanded range of possibilities due to the immense amount of information which can
be encapsulated and later extracted from the digital model.
This constructive research is a first step of a larger project to implement BIM
in a large construction company. It is aimed at developing a concept of operation for
implementing a BIM-based Cost Estimating process in one of their divisions. A main
objective of this research was to test various workflows and to evaluate their
applicability in this company’s estimating departments.
This paper firstly presents the state of the art in BIM-based Cost Estimating.
Secondly, it describes the methodology of research and the comparative studies of
data and work flows. Thirdly, possible workflows for the new technology adoption at
the studied General Contractor Company are proposed.
Cost Estimating and BIM

Managing cost is an important priority in construction management. Since
cost estimating is usually realized at the end of a project phase by different
stakeholders using datasets and information that are heterogeneous, it is a highly
fragmented, resource intensive and ineffective process especially on large or complex
projects. According to literature, variation over 40% with the initial budget is frequent
in these cases (Flyvbjerg, et al., 2003, Winch 2010).
One of the BIM promises is to tackle this problem by providing a unique
source for cost estimating for the entire lifecycle of the project. According to
Kahnzode et al (2007) a 3% cost accuracy could be achieved from front-end cost
budgeting to building construction cost. However, the technological and work
organization challenges of implementing BIM-based estimating into one of the key
stakeholders of the supply chain, the general contractor, is little documented in the
academic literature.
On BIM-Based Cost Estimating

BIM conveys two concepts: the process of a shared development of the design and
the collective object, the 3D virtual model produced using BIM enabled technologies.
This model is composed of objects that represent the different elements of the
building, and data related to each object. These data could be reused to simulate the
construction of the building (4D BIM) or to provide quantities in real time for cost
estimating (frequently referred to as 5D BIM).
Model-based cost estimating became possible after the implementation of
object-based parametric modeling in the building-modeling software. BIM-enabling
software programs use parameters and rules to determine the geometry, as well as
non-geometric properties and features of objects (Eastman et al., 2011). Type and

cost of materials, cost of elements or assemblies are features which can be assigned to
each object of a BIM (model). On the basis of the model, quantities and numbers can
be extracted. But, according to Eastman et al. (2011, p. 220):
“No BIM tool provides the full capabilities of a spreadsheet or estimating
package, so estimators must identify a method that works best for their
specific estimating process. Three primary options are:
1. Export Building object quantities to estimating software
2. Use a BIM quantity take-off tool.”
3. Link the BIM tool directly to the estimating software

Options present different levels of interoperability. In the first two options,
data are extracted from the model by exporting them using a format that could be read
by a cost estimating software, or on the second case, the estimating software has the
ability to map BIM objects with the cost database. These offer little or no
interoperability capabilities to automate the exchange of data between the model and
the BIM-based estimating.
On the Technological Challenges of Implementing BIM-based Cost Estimating.

Based on previous experiences (Forgues & Iordanova 2010), as well as on
literature review (Tiwari et al. 2009, Eastman et al. 2011), we could conclude that
BIM-based estimating technologies are not mature enough. The first challenge is the
difficulty to select the right combination of cost-estimating BIM applications. A lot of
applications are still mainly developed to address needs for a specific phase, purpose
or speciality. For example, one application is dedicated to architects for conceptual
estimating and will be of little use for quantity surveyor. There are also major
problems of interoperability between software. There are issues in transferring data
from these various applications. Another issue is that most of these applications rely
on one or few specific external cost databases. Difficult choices have to be made
between adopting an application compatible with the company legacy of cost
databases and choosing the BIM-based software that best fit the needs.
Another challenge is the difficulty for a member of the construction supply
chain to understand the differences and the specificities of each estimating software
program offering and make the right choice. Judging from our previous experience
(Forgues & Iordanova, 2010), it is unreasonable to rely only on the publicity and the
white papers of software development companies because there very often some
dimensions of the estimating process remain hidden or unclear. Moreover, there is the
risk of interoperability problems related to the choices of BIM applications made by
the other members of the supply chain for a specific project.
On the Work Organization Challenges in adopting BIM-based cost estimating

Notwithstanding the technological issues, there are also project management
and work organization issues to be addressed. Project management theory and
practices are based on a taylorist model in which the project is broken down into
work package that are divided between resources or specialties (Koskela 2000). The
first challenge is that BIM is a configurational technology, i.e. a collective tool
around which work has to be reorganized around processes and workflows. A
workflow is defined as a pattern of activity enabled by a systematic organization of

resources, defined roles and information flows, into a work process that can be
documented and learned. Therefore, to use 5D BIM efficiently, boundaries and
barriers created by the linear and fragmented project design and delivery have to be
removed.
To achieve this new contractual arrangements have to be made, that promote a
proper context for open collaboration and risk sharing in working on a shared model.
Moreover, the role of project manager becomes obsolete. New skills, such as the ones
associated to organizational architects, may be required to devise and integrate the
members of the supply chain processes, workflows and data flows (Forgues, Lejeune
in press).
A second challenge relies on the lack of maturity in the development and
integration of the BIM-based cost estimating tools. They are difficult to “tune” and
time consuming at first use. Tiwari et al. (2009) elaborate on the challenges of model-
based estimating, pointing out that the more difficult part of this process is the
cultural shift and training required. According to this author, “estimators must be
thoroughly trained in the software and run test cases to make sure that the information
coming out of the model is accurate and can be trusted”.
A third challenge is the organization and integration of the workflows
between 3D, 4D and 5D applications. Extracting data from 3D model could be
misleading. Elements could be missing or there could be anomalies in the 3D model
that will alter the quality of the estimate. Temporary structure and equipment are also
not taken in account in the 3D model, so they will not be accounted for in the quantity
take-off.
Most companies using CAD design their workflow in a way to match the use
of this technology. A change in technology involves a major challenge since it will
influence all business processes in depth. In order to take advantage from the BIM-
modeling, a coherent dataflow has to be established. It can depend on the project
context as well as on the company’s expertise in modeling and cost estimating.
The application of BIM in the estimation process is often called "5D BIM."
Some authors, though, find that a 5D model can only be built on the basis of a 4D one
including time and constructability analysis (Staub-French & Khanzode 2007). In the
context of this article, the time component is not studied, but only taken into
consideration as absolutely necessary for precise cost estimating
METHODOLOGY
This is a constructive research approach (Lurka, 2000) with qualitative
methodology similar to action-research. A theory is defined and validated within one
or more case studies. This approach is quite popular in information technology and is
used for research in construction in Finland (Rekola et al. 2010). The core principle is
that the researcher is intervening on the existing practices with the aim of
transforming it based on the supporting theory. Koskela’s (2000) TFV
(Transformation-Flow-Value generation) theory is used for this case.
The case study was realized with one of the largest construction company of
one of the Canadian provinces. The firm’s business lines include building and
infrastructure projects. Their aim is to implement BIM in their company practice in
order to expand their market reach.

This ressearch is a pilot

p project to examine the changess in work prractices and
worrk flows within
w this company
c as they movee towards aadopting a BIM-based
estiimating proccess. To co onduct this research, wwe: (1) assesssed compaany existing
practices in esttimating andd compared them
t to BIM
M, recommended processses derived
fromm literaturee (Eastman et al 2011), tested seeveral BIM--based cost estimating
ftware tools to support different
soft d phases of desiign; (2) evalluated the bbenefits and
chaallenges of working
w witth this softw
ware; and (3 ) analyzed tthe work prractices and
worrkflows of a BIM-based estimating g process wwithin the firrm (data waas collected
thro
ough semi-sttructured intterviews).
BU
UILDING TH HE BIM-BA ASED ESTIIMATING CONCEPT T OF OPER RATION
Developping a conccept of opeeration throuugh the maapping of exxisting and
dessired processs is a commmon approach in inform mation technoology. The m mapping off
exissting processes outlines a complexitty rarely adddressed in litterature is thhe influence
of the
t procurem ment mode on the estimaating processs, as illustratted in Figuree 1.
gure 1. Costt estimating

Fig g workflow at the consttruction com
mpany
In the traditional design-build-build proocurement mode, the estimating

pro
ocess is quitte straightfo orward and unsophistic ated. Biddinng documennts are still
pap
per-based an nd prescriptiive. Documeents are scaanned for onn-screen takke-off, then
quaantity data iss loaded into the cost estimating softtware to generate the prooject budget
for validation of o the sub-trrades and suupplier pricees. Integratted procurem ment modes
opeen the doo or for a morem sophiisticated prrocess, whiich includees iterative
con
nstructabilityy and cost vaalidations or verificationns during the design phasse.
An exp ploration and d analysis of
o various B BIM-5D appplications onn a sample
proj
oject confirmmed observatiions in the liiterature thatt there is stilll no perfect application

that could meet the need to automate both core cost estimating workflows. To define
the desired 5D-BIM state, we evaluated two types of BIM-based cost estimating
applications in the design phase. First, at the preliminary design stage, before any
models of the building are available – at this stage, 5D BIM tools provide parametric
models with default values according to the type of construction; these models serve
mainly to compare alternatives, their tools (DProfiler, Smart BIM QTO) are user
friendly, and can be used by architect. Second, at a more advanced stage a precise
estimation (using Autodesk QTO, Innovaya, Vico, Tocoman) can be made based on a
the model – at this stage, cost estimating should also be linked to clash detection,
constructability analysis and construction scheduling.
To select the software for the concept of operation, one of the key requirement
to be able to exchange with the Company’s Timberline database legacy. Figure 1
illustrates the proposed dataflow between applications that address issues related to
the existing workflow.
Figure 2. Interoperability and workflow between BIM 3D, 5D and cost

estimating
Figure 2 presents the BIM-based estimating workflows tested during the case
study:
- During the schematic design stage: starting from a D-Profiler parametric
schematic model and importing it into Revit.

- During the conceptual and development phases: Data is extracted from the
Revit model in two ways: using Innovaya or through Autodesk Quantity
Take-off
The links to databases are also shown. In all cases, the estimating is done in
Sage Timberline (at the client’s request). Several possible workflows were created
and evaluated according to the following criteria: the depth of the changes they imply
for the company organization; the ability to preserve and assure the future use of the
company’s know how; the learning curve of the new software versus the features they
offer; and the expected productivity improvements. Figure 3 presents the final step of
the transition from the initial state presented in Figure 1.
Figure 3. Proposed cost estimating process
As shown in the Figure, there are little changes in the existing workflow. A
5D-BIM was selected for the overall estimating process because of its ability to
interoperate with 3D software and the firm’s cost database legacy. A 5D-BIM
application for conceptual cost estimating is proposed for scenario analysis at the
project front-end.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The paper presents a first step in a constructive research undertaken with a
large construction company with the aim to cogenerate new knowledge of practices
regarding the implementation and use of a new set of technologies that are redefining
existing practices. This step focuses on a strategic element of the success of such
organization: the cost estimating process. It contributes to knowledge by the
application of a new research approach derived from other disciplines better adapted
to the co-generation of new practice knowledge. It also shed light to practical
challenges in implementing advanced BIM capabilities within a construction firm. As

suggested in constructive research theory, the best validation is the endorsement from
the industrial to follow suit with the recommendations which was confirmed
following the presentation of our results to their board.
As suggested by BIM literature (Recola et al. 2010, Eastman et al. 2011),
there are many challenges with automating many aspects of the building estimating
process which cannot be described in details in this paper. For example it is very
important to understand that we must change the Timberline database based on the
parameters of Revit objects and not the other. It is necessary to check for collisions
during the creation of the model because the 5D BIM software tools do not detect all
the collisions. The use of BIM 4D software (Innovaya 4D, Solibri or Navisworks) can
solve this problem. The creation or modification of objects must be made according
to construction methods deployed in reality. Although there are many potential
benefits to BIM-based cost estimating, there are also certain considerations for
estimating at the different phases of design. For example, for the preliminary design
stage, an export of the model to another modeling software is needed in order to
continue the design from there – which is not available yet with the necessary quality.
For the more advanced stage, an import of the building model (including all
specialities: architecture, MEP, Structure, Civil) for Quantity Take-off or a direct link
to the BIM software is needed. Mapping through rules and formula, visual interaction
with the elements and clash detection are essential.
An important challenge is the organizational change provoked by introduction
of the BIM technology – a change which should support the systemic adoption of
BIM in the whole organisation. At the moment of BIM introduction, as Recola et al.
(2010) states: “implementation of BIM creates challenges to the project management
as there are many new BIM-enabled options for improved communication, analysis
and design coordination but not yet mechanisms, tools or rules-of-thumb for selecting
what to exploit, and when, in the most beneficial and cost-efficient way”. A process
of auto observation, analysis and learning should be set-up in the company in order to
guide and control the BIM adoption process.
There are also opportunities to apply principles derived from TFV theory
regarding Lean Construction, as explored by Sacks et al. (2010). Some possibilities to
automate some elements for the control of the production control were explored and
presented. However, it was not possible to go much further in the scope of this four
months research project, since considerable practitioner input is needed to set up the
software and cost estimating database(s), extract information from the building model
in a format that is aligned with the structure of the cost database, and finally to tune
the cost estimate according to the specific context of the construction project.
REFERENCES
Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2005). Think, Play, Do: Technology,
Innovation, and Organization: Oxford University Press.
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sachs, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to
Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers,
and Contractors (Second ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk : an
anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, Angleterre: Cambridge University Press.

Forgues, D., & Iordanova, I. (2010). An IDP-BIM framework for reshaping

professional design practices. Paper presented at the Construction Research
Congress 2010 (CRC 2010), 8-11 mai, Banff,Canada.
Forgues, D., & Lejeune, A. (2011 (in press). BIM: in search for organisational
architects International Journal of Project Organisation and Management
Khanzode, A. Fischer, M. Reed, D. (2008) Benefits and lessons learned of
implementing building virtual design and construction (vdc) technologies for
coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (mep) systems on a large
healthcare project, ITCON

Koskela, L. (2000). An exploration towards a production theory and its application to
construction. Technical Research Center of Finland, Finland.
Lukka, K. (2000). The key issues of applying the constructive approach to field
research. Sarja: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration
Rekola M., J. Kojima & T. Makelainen (2010) Toward Integrated Design and
Delivery Solutions: Pinpointed Challenges of Process Change. In:
Architectural Engineering and Design Management
Sacks, S., L. Koskela, B.A. Dave & R. Owen (2010) Integration of Lean and Building
Information Modeling in Construction. In: Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management
Staub-French, S., & Khanzode, A. (2007). 3D and 4D modeling for design and
construction coordination: issues and lessons learned. ITCon.
Tiwari, S., Odelson, J., Watt, A., & Khanzode, A. (2009). Model Based Estimating to
Inform Target Value Design
<http://www.aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2009/ModelBasedEstimating.ht
ml> (Nov. 20, 2011)
Winch, G. M. (2010). Managing Construction Projects (Second ed.). Oxford, UK:
Blackwell Publishing.

Rethinking The Cost Estimating Process Through 5D BIM A Case Study 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rethinking The Cost Estimating Process Through 5D BIM A Case Study 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rethinking The Cost Estimating Process Through 5D BIM A Case Study 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Construction Research Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012 778

Rethinking the Cost Estimating Process through 5D BIM: a Case Study

Daniel FORGUES1 Ivanka IORDANOVA2, Fernando VALDIVESIO3 and Sheryl

Construction Research Congress 2012

Cost Estimating and BIM

On BIM-Based Cost Estimating

Construction Research Congress 2012

3. Link the BIM tool directly to the estimating software

On the Technological Challenges of Implementing BIM-based Cost Estimating.

On the Work Organization Challenges in adopting BIM-based cost estimating

Construction Research Congress 2012

Construction Research Congress 2012

This ressearch is a pilot

gure 1. Costt estimating

In the traditional design-build-build proocurement mode, the estimating

Construction Research Congress 2012

Figure 2. Interoperability and workflow between BIM 3D, 5D and cost

Construction Research Congress 2012

Figure 3. Proposed cost estimating process

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Construction Research Congress 2012

Construction Research Congress 2012

Forgues, D., & Iordanova, I. (2010). An IDP-BIM framework for reshaping

healthcare project, ITCON

Construction Research Congress 2012

You might also like