100% found this document useful (1 vote)
73 views7 pages

Simple Pendulum Lab Report

This document describes a physics lab experiment on simple pendulums. The experiment aimed to show that the period of a simple pendulum is independent of mass and angle of displacement. It also calculated the acceleration due to gravity. Trials were conducted with varying string lengths, masses, and angles. Results supported the independence of period on mass and angle, and a value of 9.198 m/s^2 was obtained for acceleration due to gravity.

Uploaded by

Simiret Demise
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
73 views7 pages

Simple Pendulum Lab Report

This document describes a physics lab experiment on simple pendulums. The experiment aimed to show that the period of a simple pendulum is independent of mass and angle of displacement. It also calculated the acceleration due to gravity. Trials were conducted with varying string lengths, masses, and angles. Results supported the independence of period on mass and angle, and a value of 9.198 m/s^2 was obtained for acceleration due to gravity.

Uploaded by

Simiret Demise
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

lOMoARcPSD|41033737

Simple Pendulum lab report

Physics Laboratory I (University of Louisiana at Lafayette)

Scan to open on Studocu

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university


Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|41033737

- ---
- ---
- Experiment: Simple Harmonic Motion - Simple Pendulum
- 10/23/2018
- PHYS 215, T 3pm

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|41033737

Purpose

The purpose of this experiment was to prove that the period of a simple pendulum is

independent of both the mass of the hanging object and the angle of displacement of the

pendulum. We also calculated an experimental value for acceleration due to gravity using the

period of the pendulum.

Theory

A simple pendulum apparatus consists of a massed object connected to a massless

string of a certain length. Simple pendulums are tools that demonstrate simple harmonic motion

(if the angle of displacement is less than 30 degrees). When the pendulum is at rest, the

displacement angle is equal to zero degrees. As the mass is released from some angle of

displacement, the string swings back and forth, with gravity working as the restoring force.

The period is the time it takes to complete one full cycle. Therefore, the period of a

simpe pendulum is the time it takes to swing from one side to the other and back again. The

period has units in seconds and is inversely proprortional to the frequency. The following

equation can be used to find the measured period:

Another useful calculation is the calculated period. The calculated period can be used as

a GAV to determine how accurate the measured period is and can be found using the following

equation:

Another value that can be considered is angular frequency. Angular frequency is related

to the physical properties of a system, but it is not dependent on all those properties. The

physical properties present within the simple pendulum device include: length of the string,

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|41033737

mass of the object, and the angle of displacement. We can use this information in order to find

angular frequency with the following equation:

In addition to finding results about the period, this experiment is also able to prove the

acceleration due to gravity (due to gravity being the restoring force). By creating a graph of

length vs. period^2 of the first three trials with the simple pendulum, a slope can be determined

through excel. Once the slope is found, it will be possible to solve for acceleration due to gravity

with the following equation:

Procedure

We first had to establish the pendulum apparatus by measuring the length of the string

hanging from the pole with a meterstick to match the length indicated in the lab manual (1.2 m).

I was responsible for this part. Then we attached the 50 g mass to the bottom of the string with

a hook. At the top of the string where it was attached to the metal pole, we held up a protractor

and measured the angle of displacement for the string from the vertical to be 10 degrees. I held

up the protractor for most of the trials. A lab partner pulled the string out to match the 10 degree

mark and let go as another partner started a stopwatch on her phone. Another lab partner

counted 20 oscillations of the pendulum. At the exact moment the 20th oscillation was met, the

timer was stopped. This process was repeated three times for each trial. The next trials included

changing the string length to 1 meter and 0.75 meters at 10 degrees displacement. We also did

trials with 0.75 meters of string and 20 degrees displacement, and then 0.75 meters, 20 degrees

displacement, and a 100 g mass. Each of these situations was repeated a total of three times

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|41033737

each, giving us three times (in seconds) for each. We then found the average time for each trial,

experimental period (in seconds), GAV period, and percent error. Experimental period for the

first three trials was squared and plotted against length of the string in Excel. The slope from the

best fit line was used to solve for the experimental value of g.

Here is a pendulum apparatus similar to the setup we used in lab to obtain our data.

Data (attached)

Analysis (attached)

Conclusion

The results of this experiment were very accurate. For trials 1-3 in which we only

changed the length of the string and kept the mass and angle of displacement constant, the

measured periods became smaller as we decreased the length of the string. For example, at a

length of 1.2 m, our measured period was 2.251 s (with average time of 45.02 seconds for 20

oscillations). At a length of 1 m, the measured period was 2.0595 s (average time of 41.19 s for

20 oscillations). At 0.75 m, the measured period was 1.772 s (average time of 35.44 s for 20

oscillations). When comapared to the calculated (GAV) periods for trials 1-3, we obtained

percent errors of 2.41%, 2.66%, and 2.01% for trials 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The fact that the

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|41033737

period changed with the length of the string suggests that the period is dependent on length. For

trial 4, the mass of the object was kept at 50 g, and the length of the string was kept at 0.75 m,

but the angle of displacement was increased to 20 degrees. For this trial, our measured period

was 1.769 s (average time of 35.38 s for 20 oscillations). Our calculated period was 1.737 s,

giving us a percent error of 1.84%. The periods for trials 3 and 4 were very similar, which

suggests that period is independent of the angle of displacement. For trial 5, the length of the

string was kept at 0.75 m and the angle of the displacement was kept at 20 degrees, but the

mass of the object was changed to 100 g. For this trial, our measured period was 1.7555 s

(average time of 35.11 s for 20 oscillations). The calculated period was 1.737 s, giving us a

percent error of 1.07%. The periods for trials 4 and 5 were very similar, which suggests that the

period is independent of the mass of the object. From this experiment and the results, we

learned that the period does not depend on the initial angle of displacement or the mass of the

object hanging. The period in fact does depend on the length of the string.

A graph was generated of length versus period squared for the first three trials. The

slope of this graph from the best-fit line equation was used to find the acceleration due to

gravity. With a slope of 0.233 m/s^2, we calculated the g to be 9.198 m/s^2. This gave us a

percent error of 6.24% when compared to the GAV of 9.81 m/s^2, which is rather accurate but

not as accurate as our results for period earlier. Sources of error include incorrect measuring of

displacement angles and string lengths, delayed reaction times when started and stopping the

stopwatch timer, and the string not being pulled tightly (with enough tension) when being

released. This final source of error could have affected the path of motion of the mass, making it

drop when being released instead of fall (simple harmonic motion).

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])


lOMoARcPSD|41033737

Downloaded by Simiret Demise ([email protected])

You might also like