Sara Akram - SPM Report
Sara Akram - SPM Report
Assignment
Submitted By
Sara Akram
Roll No
Fall-2023/MSCP/006
Submitted To
Department of Psychology
Bio Data
Name: H.K
Gender: Female
Qualification: Bachelors
The client was referred to assess cognitive abilities and intellectual level.
Presenting Complaints
The client didn’t show up with presenting complaints. The purpose of this
intellectual level.
Test Administered
Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) was used for assessment of client’s intellectual
level. This test checks how well someone can understand and think clearly. Before
starting, the client got clear instructions, and she followed them perfectly. She did a
Clinical Interview
client’s intellectual level. The informed consent was taken before the interview. To
The client's actions were observed upon entering the room. She was
dressed appropriately and appeared well-groomed. She seated herself calmly and
conducted herself in a manner fitting the situation. Throughout the session, she
maintained good eye contact with the examiner and upheld suitable body posture.
She asked a few questions regarding the test procedures and outcomes. There were
Background History
Client is 24 years old female who has completed her bachelors a year ago. She
is eldest sister among 4 siblings. She belongs to a middle class family. Her parents
have a satisfactory relationship with each other. She shares a strong bond with her
siblings and mother as well. Her parents provide support love, care and warmth to all
the children. Overall, she receives a healthy and satisfactory home environment.
performance throughout the life was commendable. She was an intelligent student in
her class and always showed good performance. She shared a good relationship with
Client reported to suffer from anxiety while she was 16. She didn’t have any
Quantitative Analysis
52 90 2nd + -3 36 minutes
Qualitative Analysis
in the above table shows sum of correct responses of client in all sets (i-e A,B, C, D, E)
Client received percentile score of 90, which means that client performs equal to or
better than 90% of people of her age range. Grades are given in the manual according
to different percentile scores, which clearly shows intellectual level of test taker.
Client falls in 2nd + grade according to her percentile score. It means that she has an
error either in test administration, or it’s scoring. Discrepancy value above +2 and
below -2 shows that the test result is not reliable and it needs to be administered again.
This result shows discrepancy value -3, which means we cannot rely on given results.
Conclusion
Above results gives a conclusion that the 24 years old client performed test in
36 minutes. Results from her responses revealed that she has intellectual capacity
above average.