materials

Review
A Review on Synthetic Fibers for Polymer Matrix Composites:
Performance, Failure Modes and Applications
Dipen Kumar Rajak 1, * , Pratiksha H. Wagh 2 and Emanoil Linul 3, *

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, G. H. Raisoni Institute of Business Management,

Jalgaon 425002, MH, India
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, G. H. Raisoni Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Pune 412207, MH, India; [email protected]
3 Department of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Politehnica University Timisoara,
300 222 Timisoara, Romania
* Correspondence: [email protected] (D.K.R.); [email protected] (E.L.)

Abstract: In the last decade, synthetic fiber, as a reinforcing specialist, has been mainly used in poly-
mer matrix composites (PMC’s) to provide lightweight materials with improved stiffness, modulus,
and strength. The significant feature of PMC’s is their reinforcement. The main role of the reinforce-
ment is to withstand the load applied to the composite. However, in order to fulfill its purpose, the
reinforcements must meet some basic criteria such as: being compatible with the matrix, making
chemical or adhesion bonds with the matrix, having properties superior to the matrix, presenting the
optimal orientation in composite and, also, having a suitable shape. The current review reveals a
detailed study of the current progress of synthetic fibers in a variety of reinforced composites. The
main properties, failure modes, and applications of composites based on synthetic fibers are detailed
both according to the mentioned criteria and according to their types (organic or inorganic fibers). In
addition, the choice of classifications, applications, and properties of synthetic fibers is largely based
on their physical and mechanical characteristics, as well as on the synthesis process. Finally, some
Citation: Rajak, D.K.; Wagh, P.H.; future research directions and challenges are highlighted.
Linul, E. A Review on Synthetic
Fibers for Polymer Matrix Keywords: synthetic fibers; FRP composites; properties; failure modes; applications
Composites: Performance, Failure
Modes and Applications. Materials
2022, 15, 4790. https://doi.org/
10.3390/ma15144790
1. Introduction
Academic Editor: Sergio Torres-Giner The necessity for Synthetic Fibers (SFs) is advancing globally, as it is a highly signifi-
cant form of material for fiber-reinforced composite structures. The growing demand for
Received: 23 May 2022
Accepted: 5 July 2022
lightweight and unique composite materials increases the need for SFs due to their excellent
Published: 8 July 2022
characteristics [1–3]. There is strong competition between Synthetic Fibers and Natural
Fibers (NFs) [4]. However, over the past 20 years, SFs such as ceramic fabrics, carbon fibers,
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral glass fibers, basalt fibers, and polymeric fibers have received special attention [5,6]. Because
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
SFs provide high strength and inertia, they are widely used in the production of advanced
published maps and institutional affil-
composite materials in aerospace and automotive environments [7].
iations.
On the other hand, due to the environmental sustainability, NFs are employed as
a standby for SFs [8]. The flexibility and elastic properties of SFs make them stronger
than NFs, also the water strain, chemical, and heat resistance capability of SFs are nor-
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
mally higher than that of NFs [9–11]. The shortage of NFs is satisfied by SFs, as the
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. worldwide supply of NFs is insufficient [12]. In recent years, the SF business has grown
This article is an open access article very fast due to the growing demand for various applications [13–15]. The use of SFs
distributed under the terms and in fiber-reinforced composites provides special characteristics compared to conventional
conditions of the Creative Commons high-density metals [16,17]. Some features include excellent tensile strength, electrical
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// conductivity, extraordinary strength-to-weight ratio, and fatigue stability [18,19]. In the
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ aerospace, defense, automotive, wind energy, and pipes manufacturing industries, there is
4.0/). a huge demand for composites based on glass, carbon, and aramid fibers [20].

Materials 2022, 15, 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144790 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials

Materials 2022, 15, 4790 2 of 28

The synthetic fiber has to pass through four processes at the time of manufacture,
such as chemical, spinning, winding, and packaging. A chemical method is normally
polymerization, which plans and consolidates the parts for the fiber. Polymerization is
the development of macromolecules through the reiteration of essential units. At first, the
different parts are solids and should be changed over to a fluid state to be expelled into
fibers. The materials are synthetically changed over, disintegrated, or liquefied, transform-
ing into a thick fluid. Further, the spinning cycle delivers the fiber by passing the thick
fluid through a spinneret. A spinneret is a gadget with many openings of a predefined
breadth. The fluid is constrained through the spinneret openings and comes out as string
fluid fiber. The opening in the spinneret decides the measurement of the fiber, which is
set by the application. The expulsion is dried to a ceaseless fiber. A winding cycle turns
the fiber into yarn. The fiber falls upward from the spinneret and is trapped in a huge
vacuum spout. The vacuum power makes pressure stay available, as it is twisted around
a bobbin and packed for further use [21]. However, the most widely used process for
obtaining fibers is electro-spinning. It is a manufacturing strategy involving electrostat-
ically driven interaction that is used to make electro-spun fibers. The distance between
these fibers varies regularly between many nanometers and a few micrometers. One of
the main advantages of the electro-spinning process is its flexibility in handling to make
filaments with different options for action and morphological constructions. With the
development of nanotechnology, scientists are becoming more interested in focusing on
the remarkable properties of materials on the nanoscale. Electro-spinning, an electrostatic
fiber manufacturing method, has recently attracted more interest and attention due to its
adaptability and potential for applications in various fields, being created or liquefied using
a fixed electric field in a polymer assembly. Fibers created by this procedure emulate parts
of the extracellular network very carefully in contrast to regular strategies. The twisted
filaments in the submicron range created by this interaction offer various advantages such
as a high surface area to volume ratio, adjustable porosity, and the ability to control the
nanofiber structure in order to obtain the desired functions and properties [22].
Recently, SF has become the most demanding material on the market for fiber-
reinforced composite. All types of composites reinforced with SFs are equally important
for different grades of industrial applications [23]. Although the composite matrix is a
constant part in the whole volume of the composite material, the discrete components in
the volume of the matrix are reinforced parts or fillers, which largely decide the properties
of the composite [24]. All composite polymeric materials can be restrictively grouped
according to the components: the type of reinforcement and its direction, the type of matrix
material, and the technique of manufacturing composites [25]. The important aspect related
to SFs revealed that it significantly improves the load-carrying capacity with improved
toughness, fatigue, and impact resistance, thus making it compatible with concrete for
construction-related works [26,27].
Therefore, given the important and widespread distribution of SFs, an overview of
the various SFs applicable to the composites sector is presented. In this paper, the SFs are
divided into specific categories and for each type, the main characteristics and applications
are presented in detail. The structure and arrangement of the fibers into composites together
with their failure modes are also illustrated. Finally, some future research directions and
challenges of using SFs are presented.

2. Types of Synthetic Fibers

Synthetic Fibers are basically classified into three major categories: organic fibers,
inorganic fibers, and others, which are further sub-classified according to their origin. The
broad classification of SFs and their sub-classifications are illustrated in Figure 1.
Materials 2022,15,
Materials2022, 15,4790
x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of
3 of 2928

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Classification of synthetic
synthetic fibers
fibers based
based on
onorganic,
organic,inorganic,
inorganic,and
andother
otherfibers.
fibers.

Synthetic fibers are manufactured

manufactured entirely
entirelyin inthe
thelaboratory
laboratoryfromfrompolymers
polymersthat thatdodo
not occur naturally, generally from petroleum by-products. Spinning,
not occur naturally, generally from petroleum by‐products. Spinning, polymerization, polymerization, and
filament processing
and filament processing are the
are technique
the techniquethatthat
cancanprocess
processsynthetic fibers.
synthetic fibers. Moreover,
Moreover, further
fur‐
spinning process
ther spinning is classified
process into three
is classified intosub-categories such assuch
three sub‐categories melt as
spinning, wet spinning,
melt spinning, wet
and dry, toand
spinning, make
dry,filaments from synthetic
to make filaments polymers
from synthetic [21]. A [21].
polymers viscous polymer
A viscous is passed
polymer is
through a spinneret
passed through (a small (a
a spinneret nozzle-like plate with
small nozzle‐like multiple
plate small holes)
with multiple small to holes)
create atofilament.
create
Polymerization is a process is
a filament. Polymerization where the material
a process where thecanmaterial
be converted
can beinto high molecular
converted into highweight
mo‐
complexes
lecular weightwithcomplexes
various physical properties.
with various physical Polymer is the
properties. name of
Polymer is athe
by-product
name of a spun by‐
from the reaction [28]. Numerous infinite fine filaments are formed
product spun from the reaction [28]. Numerous infinite fine filaments are formed in syn‐ in synthetic filament
yarns. Continuous
thetic filament yarns. filaments are cut
Continuous to shortare
filaments lengths
cut toto make
short stapletofibers,
lengths makewhich stapleare then
fibers,
veiled
which and sold veiled
are then to the textile
and sold industry to produce
to the textile yarn.
industry toThe third yarn.
produce form The in which
third synthetic
form in
fibers
whichare provided
synthetic is yarn,
fibers which isisalso
are provided made
yarn, whichfrom tow. made from tow.
is also

2.1.
2.1. Organic
Organic Fibers
Fibers
Organic
Organic fibers are obtained
fibers are obtained from
from aa commodity
commoditythat thatmatures
maturesininthe
thesoil
soilororisisobtained
obtained
from the skin of animals or is created by an insect. Abaca, camel hair, jute,
from the skin of animals or is created by an insect. Abaca, camel hair, jute, hemp, coir, hemp, coir,
aramid, and silk are some common examples of organic fibers and there
aramid, and silk are some common examples of organic fibers and there is a tremendous is a tremendous
variation
variation inin the
the softness of substances
softness of substances made
madefrom
fromthese
thesefibers.
fibers.The
Thefabulous
fabulousfiber
fibergrows
grows
from the cocoon and the single extended strand is known as silk, which is
from the cocoon and the single extended strand is known as silk, which is obtained from obtained from
the cocoons of a special caterpillar that serves on mulberry
the cocoons of a special caterpillar that serves on mulberry [29,30]. [29,30].

2.1.1. Aramid/Kevlar Fibers

2.1.1. Aramid/Kevlar Fibers
Aramid (AR) fiber is a kind of strong synthetic fiber, with outstanding properties,
Aramid (AR) fiber is a kind of strong synthetic fiber, with outstanding properties,
such as high-temperature stability, impact stability, low weight, and ensures outstanding
such as high‐temperature stability, impact stability, low weight, and ensures outstanding
energy absorption performance [31]. The structure of the Aramid fiber is the one shown in
energy absorption performance [31]. The structure of the Aramid fiber is the one shown
Figure 2. The structure of the aramid consists of several repeating connections between
in Figure 2. The structure of the aramid consists of several repeating connections between
chains. These chains are connected with hydrogen bonds and offer ten times the tensile
chains. These chains are connected with hydrogen bonds and offer ten times the tensile
strength of steel for the same weight. AR fibers are twisted firmly to the point that it is
strength of steel for the same weight. AR fibers are twisted firmly to the point that it is
beyond difficult to isolate them [32].
beyond difficult to isolate them [32].
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 29
Materials 2022,15,
Materials2022, 15,4790
x FOR PEER REVIEW 44 of
of 28
29

Figure 2. Primary structure of Aramid/Kevlar [33].

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Primary
Primary structure
structure of
of Aramid/Kevlar
Aramid/Kevlar [33].
[33].
Aramid fibers are 45% lighter than glass fibers, twice as strong as E‐glass, and ten
Aramid fibers
Aramid fibers are
are 45%
45% lighter
lighter than
than glass
glass fibers,
fibers, twice
twice asas strong
strong as as E-glass,
E‐glass, and
and ten
ten
times more efficient than aluminum [34]. The main use of aramid fiber is in the airplane
timesmore
times moreefficient
efficientthan
thanaluminum
aluminum [34].
[34]. TheThe main
main useuse of aramid
of aramid fiberfiber
is inisthe
in airplane
the airplane
and
and military industries, such as ballistic composites and ballistic‐rated body armor fabric
military industries,
and military such such
industries, as ballistic composites
as ballistic compositesand ballistic-rated bodybody
and ballistic‐rated armor fabricfabric
armor [35].
[35]. Also, other applications like bulletproof vests, boats, motorsports, protective gloves,
Also, otherother
[35]. Also, applications like bulletproof
applications vests,vests,
like bulletproof boats,boats,
motorsports, protective
motorsports, gloves,
protective and
gloves,
and racing car body components are quite widespread [36–38]. Figure 3 shows the main
racing car body
and racing components
car body components are are
quite widespread
quite widespread [36–38].
[36–38].Figure
Figure3 3shows
showsthe the main
main
applications of AR fiber [39].
applications
applications of
of AR
AR fiber
fiber [39].
[39].

Figure 3.
Figure Branches of
3. Branches of aramid
aramid fiber
fiber applications.
applications.
Figure 3. Branches of aramid fiber applications.
Tables 11 and
Tables and 22 show
show thethe properties
properties andand global
global manufacturing
manufacturing of of AR
AR fibers.
fibers. It
It was
was
found Tables
that 1 and
the sum 2ofshow
the the properties
engaging and and global
opposite manufacturing
electric forces betweenof atoms
AR fibers.
and It was
hydro-
found that the sum of the engaging and opposite electric forces between atoms and hy‐
found
gen that the and
molecules sump-pof the engaging
stacking bondsand opposite
has flourishedelectric
thetheforces between
construction atoms and
of Kevlar aramid hy‐
drogen molecules and p‐p stacking bonds has flourished construction of Kevlar ara‐
drogen molecules
nanofiber and p‐p
(KANF) based stacking bonds
membranes for thehas flourished
separation andthe construction
energy of Kevlar
transformation ara‐
of pow-
mid nanofiber (KANF) based membranes for the separation and energy transformation of
mid nanofiber
erful bonds with (KANF) basedcapability.
the material membranes for the separation
According and energy
to this information, transformation
several designs and of
powerful bonds with the material capability. According to this information, several de‐
powerful bonds
approaches with the material
for manufacturing capability.KANF-based
and practicing According tomembranes
this information,
shouldseveral de‐
begin [40].
signs and approaches for manufacturing and practicing KANF‐based membranes should
signsInand approaches
addition, for manufacturing
the chopped and practicing
AR fiber-reinforced rubberKANF‐based
composite has membranes should
been extensively
begin [40].
used
beginin[40].structural applications due to its unique features. The hyperelastic characteris-
In addition, the chopped AR fiber‐reinforced rubber composite has been extensively
tics ofInthe rubberthe
addition, matrix are indeed
chopped a big challenge
AR fiber‐reinforced related
rubber to the extensive
composite has beenaspect ratio
extensively
used in structural applications due to its unique features. The hyperelastic characteristics
and
usedthe in anisotropy of the AR fibers.
structural applications due toGao et al. [41]
its unique conducted
features. a combined characteristics
The hyperelastic experimental-
of the rubber matrix are indeed a big challenge related to the extensive aspect ratio and
numerical
of the rubber study to predict
matrix the hyperelastic
are indeed mechanical
a big challenge relatedcharacteristics
to the extensiveof the chopped
aspect AR
ratio and
the anisotropy of the AR fibers. Gao et al. [41] conducted a combined experimental‐nu‐
fiber-reinforced rubber composite. The authors noted that, with
the anisotropy of the AR fibers. Gao et al. [41] conducted a combined experimental‐nu‐the help of the digital
merical study to predict the hyperelastic mechanical characteristics of the chopped AR
image
mericalcorrelation, the mechanical
study to predict deformation
the hyperelastic can becharacteristics
mechanical predicted efficiently, but the con-
of the chopped AR
fiber‐reinforced rubber composite. The authors noted that, with the help of the digital im‐
centration of regional
fiber‐reinforced rubberstrain at the The
composite. micron scale,
authors depending
noted that, withonthe
thehelp
macro image,
of the is not
digital im‐
accurately analyzed.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 5 of 28

Table 1. Properties of Aramid/Kevlar composites [37,38,42].

Fiber Laminate Tensile Tensile Specific Specific Compressive Compressive

Material Matrix Weight Specific Strength Modulus Tensile Tensile Strength Modulus
Fraction Gravity (MPa) (MPa) Modulus Strength (MPa) (MPa)
(MPa) (MPa)
AR K49, 0.44 1.31 430 25,994 19,857 329 115 16,272
Woven Polyester
AR K49,
Woven Epoxy 0.55 1.31 450 29,993 22,890 344 172 -
Kevlar 49 Polyester 0.42 1.293 372 19,306 - - 115 17,927
(1350)
Kevlar 49 Polyester 0.42 1.3 384 23,925 - - 114 19,306
(1350S)
AR 900S Polyester 0.48 1.294 443 26,614 - - 103 19,306

Table 2. Global manufacturing of AR fibers [43].

Fiber Product Base Polymer Fiber Producer Application

p-AR fibers
Poly(p-phenylene Goods offered to give
Kevlar DuPont Co.
terephthalamide) multi-threat security
Poly(p-phenylene
Twaron Akzo Nobel PVB Prepreg
terephthalamide)
Poly[5-amino-2-(p-aminophenyl)
SVM Russia Bulletproof vest and helmets
benzimidazole terephthalamide]
m-AR fibers
Poly(m-phenylene Flame barrier for aircraft
Nomex DuPont Co.
isophthalamide) insulation
Poly(m-phenylene Hoses, filters, and copy
Teijinconex Teijin Ltd.
isophthalamide) cleaners.
Poly(m-phenylene
Fenilin Russia Fire resistance application
isophthalamide)
AR copolymer fibers
Copoly(1,4-phenylene/3,4’-
Technora diphenylether Teijin Ltd. Radiation shielding
terephthalamide)
Copoly[p-phenylene/5-amino- 2—
Armos (p-aminophenyl)benzimidazole Russia Open fire resistance
terephthalamide]
Trevar Aramid copolymer Hoechst AG Aerospace and military

2.1.2. Polyethylene Fibers

Polyethylene (PE) is made from the polymerization of ethylene and it is an adaptable
and
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW lightweight synthetic resin [44,45]. The chemical structure of PE is shown in Figure 4.
6 of 29
PE is a thermoplastic polymer with a variable crystal structure and, contingent upon the
kind, has a wide scope of uses.

Figure 4. Chemical
Figure 4. Chemical structure
structure of
ofpolyethylene
polyethylene[46].
[46].

Polyethylene
Polyethylene is is the
themost
mostwidely
widely used
used plastic
plastic in society,
in society, used
used in many
in many applications,
applications, such
such as shopping
as shopping bags,bags, containers,
containers, oil cleaning,
oil spill spill cleaning, and vehicle
and vehicle fuel tanks
fuel tanks [47].main
[47]. The The main
prop‐
properties
erties of theofPE
thecompound
PE compound are given
are given in Table
in Table 3 and3the
andapplications
the applications in Figure
in Figure 5. 5.
Polyethylene fiber aggregates are low‐density, linear, high‐density, and ultra‐molec‐
ular weight polyethylene (UMWPE) [48]. Low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) is the pri‐
mary grade of polyethylene with a strong, rigid, and crystalline organization. The wide
range of polyethylene has high electrical insulation properties, higher thermal insulation,
and great sliding properties, while their mechanical properties are generally moderate
[49–51]. A crosslinking approach to the carbon chains of the plastic polymer has been dis‐
 Low‐molded bottles for
Packaging film, garbage and
milk, grocery bags,
grocery bags, agricultural
construction film, Liquid containers, paperboard
Application mulch, wire, and cable
agricultural mulch, injection‐ packaging, stronger films, etc.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 insulation, squeeze bottles, 6 of 28
molded pails, caps,
toys, and housewares
appliance housings, and toys

Figure 5.
Figure Various branches
5. Various branches of
of polyethylene
polyethylene fiber
fiber application.
application.

2.1.3.Polyethylene fiber aggregates

Aromatic Polyester Fibers are low-density, linear, high-density, and ultra-molecular
weight polyethylene (UMWPE) [48]. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is the primary
gradeAromatic polyester
of polyethylene fibers
with have noticed
a strong, quite
rigid, and a few industrial
crystalline uses because
organization. theyrange
The wide have
very high crystallinity,
of polyethylene has highso they are difficult
electrical to process
insulation [59]. higher
properties, These types of polyesters
thermal insulation,fibers
and
(polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate
great sliding properties, while their mechanical properties are generally moderate [49–51].
and
A polyethylene
crosslinking naphthalate)
approach have huge
to the carbon softening
chains points,polymer
of the plastic high‐grade
has dielectric strength,
been discovered to
superior mechanical
create exceptional PE fibers that have a higher thermal obstruction than standard PEdevel‐
characteristics, and excellent heat stability [60–62]. They are fibers.
oped from aromatic
Contingent upon thedicarboxylic acids by polycondensation
level of cross-linking, the liquefying conductprocess, andPE
of our some
fiberadditives
changes.
While a slight cross-linking prompts a more viscous melt, unequivocally cross-linking
filaments do not dissolve at all and show elastic-like, flexible property when heated. Due
to the protected cycle, it can be easy to separately change the higher thermal resistance
of the fiber and the higher consistency of the fiber melt, along these lines making an
ideal reason for the utilization of PE fiber in a wide assortment of spaces of the variety
of industry. With polymer dissolving points of up to 131 ◦ C, PE fiber does not approach
the thermal resistance of polypropylene or polyester filaments, yet they are all things
considered appropriate for various applications. Also, some researchers are trying to
produce new UMWPE composites with various reinforcements for the enhancement in the
administration of properties, a pair of artificial intelligence methods were also been utilized
for artificial neural networks and generative algorithms [52,53]. From these two methods,
the most appropriate answers were achieved from the generative algorithm and artificial
neural network principles were employed as the objective functions [54]. If composites
like trans-1, 4-polyisoprene (TPI)/LDPE/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were developed by
a very simple natural blending technique, CNTs served as not only reinforced fillers but
also nucleation promoter, which advances the crystallinity of the TPI and LDPE parts of
the composites. Researchers conclude that the CNTs doses of 1 PHR (Parts per Hundred
Rubber) could significantly improve the properties of the TPI/LDPE composites other than
any CNTs doses [55–58].
Materials
Materials2022,
Materials 2022,15,
2022, 15,xxxFOR
15, FORPEER
FOR PEERREVIEW
PEER REVIEW
REVIEW 777of
of29
of 29
29

Materials 2022, 15, 4790 7 of 28

Table
Table3.3.Properties
Propertiesof
ofpolyethylene
polyethylenecompound
compound[56–58].
[56–58].

Properties
Properties HDPE
HDPE LDPE
LDPE LLDPE
LLDPE
Melting
Meltingpoint
point(°C)
(°C) Table 3. 120
120toto140
Properties of
140polyethylene 105
compound to
to115
105[56–58].
115 115
115toto135
135
Density
Density(g/cm
(g/cm33))
3 0.941
0.941toto0.965
0.965 0.910
0.910toto0.925
0.925 0.91
0.91to
to0.94
0.94
Properties HDPE LDPE LLDPE
Continuous temperature
Continuous temperature
Melting point (◦ C) −50
120 to
−50 to+60
to +60
140 80
80to
105 to95
to 95
115 90
90to
115 to110
to 110
135
(°C)
(°C)
Density (g/cm ) 3 0.941 to 0.965 0.910 to 0.925 0.91 to 0.94
Crystallinity
Crystallinity High‐crystalline
High‐crystalline Low‐crystalline
Low‐crystalline Semi‐crystalline
Semi‐crystalline
Continuous temperature (◦ C) −50 to +60 80 to 95 90 to 110
Electrical
Electrical insulation
insulation
Crystallinity Excellent
Excellent
High-crystalline Excellent
Excellent
Low-crystalline Excellent
Excellent
Semi-crystalline
Electrical
Water
Water insulation
absorption
absorption Excellent
Very
Very low
low Excellent
Very
Very low
low Excellent
Low
Low
Water absorption Very low Very low Low

Recycling
Recycling Code
Code
Recycling Code

Highertensile
Higher
Higher tensile and
tensile andimpact
and impact
impact
Characteristics Higher tensile strength High impact strength
Characteristics
Characteristics Higher
Highertensile
tensilestrength
strength High
Highimpact
impactstrength
strength strength
strength
strength
Low-molded bottles for milk, Packaging film, garbage and
Low‐molded
Low‐molded
grocery bottles
bottlesfor
for
bags, construction grocery bags,
Packaging
Packaging film,agricultural
film, garbage
garbageandand Liquid containers, paperboard
Application milk,
milk,
film, grocery
grocerybags,
agricultural bags,
mulch, mulch, wire, and cable
grocery
grocery bags,
bags, agricultural
agricultural packaging, stronger films, etc.
injection-molded
constructionpails,
construction film,caps,
film, insulation, squeeze bottles, Liquid
Liquidcontainers,
containers,paperboard
paperboard
Application
Application appliance housings, and toys mulch,
mulch, wire,
wire,
toys, and and cable
and cable
housewares
agricultural
agriculturalmulch,
mulch,injection‐
injection‐ packaging,
packaging,stronger
strongerfilms,
films,etc.
etc.
insulation,
insulation,squeeze
squeezebottles,
bottles,
molded pails, caps,
molded pails, caps,
toys,
toys,and
andhousewares
housewares
2.1.3. Aromatic
appliance
appliance Polyester
housings,
housings, and Fibers
andtoys
toys
Aromatic polyester fibers have noticed quite a few industrial uses because they have
very high crystallinity, so they are difficult to process [59]. These types of polyesters fibers
(polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 29
and polyethylene naphthalate) have huge softening points, high-grade dielectric strength,
superior mechanical characteristics, and excellent heat stability [60–62]. They are developed
from aromatic dicarboxylic acids by polycondensation process, and some additives were
were
addedadded to improve
to improve the properties
the properties of the of the aromatic
aromatic polyesters.
polyesters. PET (polyethylene
PET (polyethylene ter‐
terephtha-
ephthalate) is the most widely used polyester. Figure 6 shows the production of PET
late) is the most widely used polyester. Figure 6 shows the production of PET by self-ester by
self‐ester
exchangeexchange of the
of the phenyl phenyl
ester ester of p‐hydroxybenzoic
of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. acid.

Figure 6. Aromatic
Aromatic polyester chemical structure [56].

As shown in in Figure
Figure 7,
7, PET
PET fibers
fibers are found
found inin applications,
applications, such
such asas conveyor
conveyor bands,
bands,
cabling tape,
pipe, cabling tape, cord
cord wrap,
wrap, magnetic
magnetic tape,
tape, and
and electric
electric motor
motor dielectric
dielectric film
film [63,64].
[63,64].
These types of aromatic polyester fibers are created using a complex spinning spinning process that
require the recovery and reuse of strong polymer solvents [65]. The sub‐atomic sub-atomic weight of
Figure
Figure
the 5.5.Various
polymer Various branches
branches
is created of
ofpolyethylene
in the polyethylene fiber
fiberapplication.
arrangement,
acid arrangement, application. sub-atomic weight
and when an objective sub‐atomic
is reached, then, at that point the arrangement is turned to shape
is reached, then, at that point the arrangement is turned to shape continuous continuous fibers. TheThe
fibers. use
2.1.3.
of2.1.3.Aromatic
solidAromatic
acids Polyester
Polyester
presents Fibers
Fibers
difficulties in controlling and guaranteeing safety
use of solid acids presents difficulties in controlling and guaranteeing safety and harm‐ and harmlessness
to theAromatic
lessnessecosystem
Aromatic rehearses
polyester
polyester
to the ecosystem for dissolvable
fibers
fibers have
have
rehearses noticedcaretaking.
noticed
for quite
quiteacaretaking.
dissolvable afew
fewindustrial
industrialuses
usesbecause
becausetheytheyhave
have
very
veryhigh
highcrystallinity,
crystallinity,sosothey
theyare
aredifficult
difficultto
toprocess
process[59].
[59].These
Thesetypes
typesof ofpolyesters
polyestersfibers
fibers
(polyethylene
(polyethyleneterephthalate,
terephthalate,polybutylene
polybutyleneterephthalate,
terephthalate,polytrimethylene
polytrimethyleneterephthalate
terephthalate
and
and polyethylene naphthalate) have huge softening points, high‐grade dielectricstrength,
polyethylene naphthalate) have huge softening points, high‐grade dielectric strength,
superior
superior mechanical
mechanical characteristics,
characteristics, andand excellent
excellent heat
heat stability
stability [60–62].
[60–62]. They
They are
are devel‐
devel‐
oped
opedfrom
fromaromatic
aromaticdicarboxylic
dicarboxylicacids
acidsby bypolycondensation
polycondensationprocess,
process,and andsome
someadditives
additives
 pipe, cabling tape, cord wrap, magnetic tape, and electric motor dielectric film [63,64].
These types of aromatic polyester fibers are created using a complex spinning process that
require the recovery and reuse of strong polymer solvents [65]. The sub‐atomic weight of
the polymer is created in the acid arrangement, and when an objective sub‐atomic weight
is reached, then, at that point the arrangement is turned to shape continuous fibers. The
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 8 of 28
use of solid acids presents difficulties in controlling and guaranteeing safety and harm‐
lessness to the ecosystem rehearses for dissolvable caretaking.

Figure 7. 7.
Figure Application related
Application to to
related thethe
aromatic polyester
aromatic fiber
polyester in in
fiber various sectors
various [63,64].
sectors [63,64].

It It
waswas observedthat,
observed that,comparing
comparingthe themechanical
mechanical properties
properties of
of aromatic
aromaticpolyester
polyesterfibers
fi‐
with
bers withother engineering
other engineering materials,
materials,thethe
polyester
polyesterfibers have
fibers a tensile
have strength
a tensile upup
strength to to
five
times
five higher
times thanthan
higher aluminum
aluminum [66,67]. These
[66,67]. typestypes
These of fibers are required
of fibers where itwhere
are required is necessary
it is
to manufacture
necessary materials
to manufacture with lesswith
materials elongation and excellent
less elongation strength.
and excellent Also, the
strength. aromatic
Also, the
polyester fiber, in the thermosetting structure, is a superior/high-temperature
aromatic polyester fiber, in the thermosetting structure, is a superior/high‐temperature polymer
innovation,
polymer which which
innovation, is at the
is atstandard withwith
the standard the traditional epoxy-subordinate
the traditional epoxy‐subordinate resin
resinand
elite design thermoplastics for the purpose of their probable applications.
and elite design thermoplastics for the purpose of their probable applications. The aro‐ The aromatic
matrix-based
matic matrix‐basedthermosetting nanocomposites
thermosetting show incredibly
nanocomposites upgraded
show incredibly actual properties
upgraded actual
empowered by a science-supported vigorous interfacial covalent coupling instrument
created during the in situ polymerization response with different nanofiller molecule
setups [68].
In addition, efforts are being made to develop high-performance fire-resistant epoxy
resins with phosphorus-containing semi-aromatic polyester, used as multi-functional epoxy
filler, with the collective enhancement of fire-resistance and mechanical properties for
various possible applications of production [69,70]. Table 4 presents the main properties of
the PET compound.
Table 4. Properties of aromatic polyester compound [71].

2,6-Naphthalene
Properties Phthalic Anhydride Isophthalic Acid Terephthalic Acid
Dicarboxylic Acid
Melting point (◦ C) 131 341–343 427 >300
Density (g/cm3 ) 1.53 1.53 1.522 1.5
Boiling point (◦ C) 295 412.3 Decomposes 437.3
Molecular weight (g/mol) 148.1 166.14 166.13 216.192
Chemical formula C8 H4 O3 C8 H6 O4 C8 H6 O4 C12 H8 O4
Solubility in water Respond slowly Insoluble Soluble Soluble
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 9 of 28

The most commercially polyester-based fiber available today is liquid crystal aromatic
polyester (LCP) fiber. The physical properties of LCP fibers equal and sometimes exceed
those of aromatic polyamides (aramids). The main advantages of LCP over other com-
petitive fibers are abrasion durability, dimensional/chemical stability, and flex–fatigue
resistance, for example, in repeated wash industrial cycles.

2.1.4. Nylon Fibers

Numerous apparel and consumer goods are typically made from the family of syn-
thetic polymers known as nylon. Unlike other organic or semi-synthetic fibers, nylon fibers
are synthetic, which means they do not have an organic base. Nylon fibers are far more
robust, elastic, and long-lasting than polyester fibers. The fibers can be dyed in a wide
range of colors and are very strong, abrasion-resistant, easy to wash, and strong. The
filament yarns provide a smooth, supple, lightweight fabric with good resilience. Nylon is
used in both the textile and home goods industries. However, because of its lower wrin-
kle resistance and higher price, polyester has replaced cotton in many garment products.
Monomers, which are extended chains of carbon-based molecules, are the building blocks
of the polymer nylon fabric. Although nylon is available in many different forms, the
majority of them are made from polyamide monomers that are derived from petroleum,
or crude oil. Adipic acid and diamine acid react to create the polymer known as nylon.
This polymer, also known as PA 6, 6, was the first kind to be utilized for nylon fabric. The
substance PA 6, 6 is an illustration of a nylon salt since it transforms from a crystalline state
to a molten state when heated [29]. Below some important types of nylon composite are
shared [30] in Table 5.

Table 5. Some important types of nylon composite [30].

Properties Aluminum-Filled Nylon Glass-Filled Nylon Carbon Fiber-Filled Nylon

Tensile Strength (MPa) 48 ± 3 51 ± 3 76 ± 34
Density (g/cm3 ) 1.36 ± 0.05 1.22 ± 0.03 1.9 ± 1.2
Heat Deflection
130 110 143
Temperature(◦ C)
Ball Indentation Hardness - 98 270
Flexural Modulus(MPa) 3600 ± 150 2900 ± 150 10,300 ± 2070
Elongation at Break(%) 3.5 ± 1 6±3
Tensile Modulus(MPa) 3800 ± 150 3200 ± 200 7600 ± 2300

2.2. Inorganic Fibers

Nowadays inorganic fibers are becoming more and more widespread. The most
common fibers manufactured from inorganic materials are glass, carbon, boron, silica
carbide, alumina, potassium titanate, and ceramics [72–74]. Inorganic fibers can be divided
into three main categories, such as amorphous, polycrystalline, and monocrystalline fibers.
Due to the lack of grain boundary, amorphous fibers exhibit high strength and moderate
modulus of elasticity [75]. Polycrystalline fibers are made of small crystals, so they have
excellent heat stability. Monocrystalline fibers are like very fine fibers, showing extremely
high strength properties [76].

2.2.1. Glass Fibers

Glass fibers (GFs) are fabricated by melting silica sand, limestone, boric acid, and some
other components at a very high temperature of about 1200 ◦ C above [77]. Also, in the
obtained composition some oxides of several metals are added. Glass fiber is extremely fine,
lightweight, high strength, and also very durable material [78]. Compared to carbon fiber
(CF), GFs have lower strength but are less expensive than the CFs [79]. Glass fiber can be
easily formed using casting methods, and when related to metals, GFs are very profitable
due to their strength and weight characteristics [80,81]. Figure 8 shows the chemical
structure of GF, a non-crystalline material with a short-range network structure. As similar,
 the obtained composition some oxides of several metals are added. Glass fiber is ex‐
tremely fine, lightweight, high strength, and also very durable material [78]. Compared
to carbon fiber (CF), GFs have lower strength but are less expensive than the CFs [79].
Glass fiber can be easily formed using casting methods, and when related to metals, GFs
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 are very profitable due to their strength and weight characteristics [80,81]. Figure 8 shows
10 of 28
the chemical structure of GF, a non‐crystalline material with a short‐range network struc‐
ture. As similar, it does not have a definite microstructure and therefore the mechanical
characteristics, that area unit considerably determined by composition and surface finish,
it does not have a definite microstructure and therefore the mechanical characteristics, that
are identical [82].
area unit considerably determined by composition and surface finish, are identical [82].

Figure 8. Chemical structure of glass fiber [82].

Due to to its
its high
highefficiency
efficiencyatatextended
extendedtemperatures,
temperatures, the
the GFGF reinforced
reinforced epoxy
epoxy com-
compo‐
posites
sites areare frequently
frequently usedused in high
in high voltage
voltage insulation
insulation applications.
applications. TheThe addition
addition of nano
of nano and
and
micro micro
fillersfillers in epoxy
in epoxy improves
improves the dynamic
the dynamic mechanical
mechanical characteristics
characteristics of GF of GF rein-
reinforced
forced epoxy composites
epoxy composites [83,84].[83,84]. In addition,
In addition, for reducing
for reducing the weight
the weight and enhancing
and enhancing the
the hard‐
hardness and strength of the automobile parts, an eco-friendly polymer
ness and strength of the automobile parts, an eco‐friendly polymer composite can be used composite can
be usedIn
[85,86]. [85,86]. In this
this case, the case,
epoxy the epoxy
resin resin represents
represents the matrix theofmatrix of the composite,
the composite, and
and the glass
the glass and palm fibers strengthened reinforcement [87]. It has
and palm fibers strengthened reinforcement [87]. It has been reported that by increasingbeen reported that by
increasing the phase ratio of the fiber particles, the tensile strength of
the phase ratio of the fiber particles, the tensile strength of the composite is significantlythe composite is
significantly
improved [88]. improved
Moreover,[88].oneMoreover, one of
of the more the moreproperties
important important property
propertiesinproperty
compositein
composite design is the inter-laminar shear strength of composites, which
design is the inter‐laminar shear strength of composites, which is very essential for the is very essential
for the application
application of laminated
of laminated composites.
composites. Therefore,
Therefore, to to enhancethe
enhance theinterlaminar
interlaminar shear
shear
strength
strength of composites, some oxides such as graphene transformed short11GFs
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW of composites, some oxides such as graphene transformed short of 29have
GFs have been
been
introduced between the
introduced between the glass
glass fiber
fiber and
and epoxy
epoxy matrix
matrix [89].
[89]. The
The main
main applications
applications of of GFs
GFs
are
are shown
shown in in Figure
Figure 9.9.

.
Figure
Figure9. Glass fiber
9. Glass applications
fiber in various
applications sectors.sectors.
in various

To obtain the desired properties, GFs are organized in different ways [90]. Figure 10
shows some types of fiber arrangements. The strength of the GF composites depends on
the type of weave. Wherever the uniformity is preferred for strengthening, the square di‐
vision’s even number per inch of edges in the thread as tools, plain weave holding is op‐
erated [91].
Materials 2022, 15, 4790
.
11 of 28
Figure 9. Glass fiber applications in various sectors.

To
To obtain
obtain the
the desired
desired properties,
properties, GFs
GFs are
are organized
organized inin different
different ways
ways [90].
[90]. Figure
Figure 10
10
shows
shows some types of fiber arrangements. The strength of the GF composites depends on
some types of fiber arrangements. The strength of the GF composites depends on
the
the type
typeofofweave.
weave.Wherever
Wherever the
theuniformity
uniformityis preferred forfor
is preferred strengthening, the the
strengthening, square di‐
square
vision’s even number per inch of edges in the thread as tools, plain weave holding
division’s even number per inch of edges in the thread as tools, plain weave holding is is op‐
erated
operated[91].
[91].

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 10. Various weave forms of GF (a) Plain weave (b) 4‐harness satin weave—120GF (c) 8‐har‐
Figure 10. Various weave forms of GF (a) Plain weave (b) 4-harness satin weave—120GF (c) 8-harness
ness satin weave—1581GF (d) 8‐harness satin weave—181GF [92].
satin weave—1581GF (d) 8-harness satin weave—181GF [92].

The
The 8‐harness
8-harness satin
satin weaves
weaves are
are used
used when
whenthethelamination
laminationstrength
strengthfrom
fromallallthe
thesides,
sides,
as
as well
well as
as even exterior and
even exterior and beautiful
beautiful presentation,
presentation, is is wanted.
wanted. In In this
this 8‐harness
8-harness satinsatin
weave, the filling fiber passes over seven twist fibers and next below one
weave, the filling fiber passes over seven twist fibers and next below one thread fiber. thread fiber. The
more flexible than the plain weave is the 4‐harness satin weaves, here
The more flexible than the plain weave is the 4-harness satin weaves, here the filling the filling fiber
passes over three
fiber passes over thread fibers and
three thread then
fibers andbelow
then one thread
below one fiber
thread[92]. Glass
fiber [92].fiber
Glassis usually
fiber is
employed in the structural application of aircraft like fairings, radomes,
usually employed in the structural application of aircraft like fairings, radomes, wingtips, wingtips, and
helicopter rotor rotor
and helicopter blades. To withstand
blades. a large acurrent
To withstand flow E‐GFs
large current floware usedare
E-GFs because
used they
becauseare
made of made
they are borosilicate glass. If glass.
of borosilicate higherIfstrength E‐glass E-glass
higher strength is required, then S‐glass
is required, is used.
then S-glass is
used. There are five grades of GF, such as general-purpose, quartz, protective, hollow,
conducting/semi-conducting GFs and the main types of GFs are presented in Table 6 [81].

Table 6. Chemical composition of different types of GFs by wt.% [73,76,77,81].

Oxide
GFs Type
SiO2 Al2 O3 TiO2 B2 O3 CaO MgO BaO LiO2 Fe2 O3 F2 ZrO2 Na2 O + K2 O
A-glass 63–72 3.5 0–6 1.5 6.5 4.5 — — 0–6 0–6 — 14–16
E-glass 54–62 14 0.2 7.0 22 1.0 — — 0–2 0–1 — 0–2
C-glass 65 4.1 — 5.0 13.4 3.3 0–1 — 0–0.8 — — 7–10
AR-glass 55–75 0–5 0–12 0–8 1–10 — — 1–18 0–0.8 0–5 1–18 0–5
S-2-glass 65–66 24–25 — — 0–0.1 9.5–10 — — 0–0.1 — — 0–0.2
D-glass 74 — — 22.5 0–1 — — — 0–0.3 — — 0–4
R-glass 60 24 — — 9–25 3–8 — — — 0–0.3 — 0–1

 A-glass is the most common type of silica glass and is also called soda-lime-silica
glass. This type of GF is sensitive to temperature variations, due to the high coefficient
of thermal expansion produced by high thermal stresses that can cause yielding.
 E-glass is a fungal or bacteria-free fiber that can withstand the main chemical causes,
and endures dimensionally steady, even under extreme fluctuations of moisture
and heat.
 C-glass is practiced for making glass screens or shades lacking corrosion-resistant properties.
 AR-glass is produced mainly for coating standard cement weapons. It can resist
the alkaline aggregates produced throughout solidification as it contains high
zirconium oxide.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 12 of 28

 S-2-glass is normally used for polymer matrix composites that necessitate improved
mechanical characteristics. S-glass fiber is used for high-performance applications.
 D-glass is a low dielectric constant glass produced with borosilicate and used in
electrical applications.
 R-glass is a reinforcement glass made of calcium aluminosilicate used where higher
strength and acid corrosion protection are required.

2.2.2. Carbon Fibers

Carbon fiber (CF) is made of thin, strong crystalline carbon filaments, and aims to
strengthen the developed composite materials [93–95]. The diameter of the CF can reach up
to 5 microns (sometimes below), increasing its strength when twisted together like yarn. CF
is sometimes identified as a graphite fiber. CF has many advantages including high stiffness,
high tensile strength, low weight, high chemical resistance, high-temperature tolerance, and
low thermal expansion [96–98]. These facilities have made CF very widespread in space,
architecture, military, and motorsports. CF is twice as stiff as steel and five times stronger.
All these features make this material ideal for the manufacture of various parts [99,100].
Despite this, they are comparatively costly when correlated with comparable fibers such
as glass or plastic fibers [101]. CF is produced from a mixture of chemical and mechanical
methods. In the chemical method, light heating of the polymer to 600 ◦ C, which discharges
hydrogen gas and adjacent polymer chain detonators. By additional heating to 1300 ◦ C,
different chains can fuse each other because they excrete more hydrogen and nitrogen; the
remaining pure sheet is of carbon atoms.
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW The high temperature and pressure involved in this method straighten the tiny crystals
13 of 29
that the carbon sheet makes all adjacent to the corresponding axis. The chemical structure
of CF is shown in Figure 11 [102].

Figure11.
Figure 11.Chemical
Chemicalstructure
structureofofcarbon
carbonfiber
fiber[102].
[102].

Carbonfiber
Carbon fiber reinforced
reinforced polymer
polymer (CFRP)
(CFRP) may may
have have poor electrical
poor electrical conductivity,
conductivity, which
influences some safety
which influences someissues
safetywhen
issuesexposed to lightning
when exposed in aerospace
to lightning applications
in aerospace [103].
applications
Therefore, the remarkable
[103]. Therefore, layer oflayer
the remarkable transformed silver carbon
of transformed nanotube
silver carbon was promoted
nanotube was pro‐
through the electrophoretic
moted through deposition
the electrophoretic techniquetechnique
deposition for the preservation of CFRP structures
for the preservation of CFRP
and parts [104].
structures Carbon
and parts fibers
[104]. havefibers
Carbon gradually replaced many
have gradually traditional
replaced materialsmate‐
many traditional and
have
rials confirmed that by adding
and have confirmed that byCF,adding
the properties can be improved
CF, the properties because CF
can be improved rods are
because CF
used
rods rather than
are used steelthan
rather barssteel
[105]. All[105].
bars theseAll
characteristics have ledhave
these characteristics to an increase
led in the
to an increase
applicability of the carbon
in the applicability fibers, Figure
of the carbon fibers, 12 [106].12 [106].
Figure
 which influences some safety issues when exposed to lightning in aerospace applications
[103]. Therefore, the remarkable layer of transformed silver carbon nanotube was pro‐
moted through the electrophoretic deposition technique for the preservation of CFRP
structures and parts [104]. Carbon fibers have gradually replaced many traditional mate‐
rials and have confirmed that by adding CF, the properties can be improved because CF
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 13 of 28
rods are used rather than steel bars [105]. All these characteristics have led to an increase
in the applicability of the carbon fibers, Figure 12 [106].

Figure 12.
Figure Applicationof
12. Application ofcarbon
carbonfiber
fiber in
in various
various sectors
sectors [106].
[106].

Depending on
Depending on the
the CF
CF weaves,
weaves,the
thestrength
strengthofofthe fiber
the can
fiber be be
can determined. ForFor
determined. this,this,
the
different
the
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW weaves,
different suchsuch
weaves, as plain weave,
as plain eight-harness
weave, satin weave,
eight‐harness give-harness
satin weave, satin weave,
give‐harness 14satin
of 29
are shown
weave, in Figure
are shown in 13. Due13.
Figure to Due
poortolayering, the plain
poor layering, theweaves are used
plain weaves arefor simple
used shapes
for simple
or structures, while eight-harness satin weave exhibits improved fiber flexible property.
shapes or structures, while eight‐harness satin weave exhibits improved fiber flexible
property.

(a) (b) (c)

Figure
Figure 13.
13. Weaves
Weaves of
of carbon
carbon fiber
fiber (a)
(a) Plain
Plain weave—3K‐70‐P
weave—3K-70-P carbon
carbon (b)
(b) 8‐harness
8-harnesssatin
satinweave—3K‐
weave—3K-
135‐8H carbon (c) 5‐harness satin weave—1K‐50‐5H carbon. Reproduced from [107].
135-8H carbon (c) 5-harness satin weave—1K-50-5H carbon. Reproduced from [107].

The
The GFs
GFs are
are divided
divided intointo ultra‐high
ultra-high modulus
modulus (UHM)(UHM) (E (E >> 450
450 GPa),
GPa), high
high modulus
modulus
(HM)
(HM) (350 GPa > E > 450 GPa), intermediate modulus (IM) (200 GPa > E > 350 GPa),
(350 GPa > E > 450 GPa), intermediate modulus (IM) (200 GPa > E > 350 GPa), high
high
tensile
tensile strength
strength (HTS)‐low
(HTS)-low modulus
modulus (LM)
(LM) (σ(σ >> 33 GPa
GPa and
and EE << 100
100 GPa),
GPa), ultra‐high
ultra-high tensile
tensile
strength
strength (UHTS) (σ >> 4.5 4.5 GPa)
GPa) [108–111],
[108–111], includes
includes thethe main
main physical
physical characteristics
characteristics of
of GFs
GFs
are
are presented in Table 7 [108,112,113] which is dependingdepending on on the
the mechanical
mechanical behaviors.
behaviors.
In
In addition,
addition, according
according to the manufacturing method, the GFs are divided into [114]:
 PAN
PAN type CF, generated
type CF, generated fromfrom the
the carbonization
carbonization procedure
procedure of of polyacrylonitrile
polyacrylonitrile atat aa
temperature
temperature of of 1200
1200 °C
◦ Cfor
forseveral
severalminutes.
minutes. These
Thesefibers
fibers have
have an
an HTS
HTS and
and HM,
HM, being
being
widely used in the aerospace and sports industries
widely used in the aerospace and sports industries [115]. [115].
 Pitch type CF, generated from the carbonization procedure of oil/coal in a nitrogen
environment at a temperature of about 1200 °C. Pitch CF has various characteristics
from LM to UHM. Due to this aspect, the fibers are used in stiff and thermally con‐
ductive elements [116].
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 14 of 28

 Pitch type CF, generated from the carbonization procedure of oil/coal in a nitrogen
environment at a temperature of about 1200 ◦ C. Pitch CF has various characteristics
from LM to UHM. Due to this aspect, the fibers are used in stiff and thermally
conductive elements [116].

Table 7. Physical characteristics of various types of carbon fiber [37,108,112–114,116].

Young’s Maximum
Density Tensile Tenacity
Type of Fiber Precursor Material Modulus Elongation
(kg/m3 ) Strength [GPa] (GPa)
(GPa) (%)
HTS PAN 1760 3–5 2.8–4 200–250 1.2–1.4
UHTS PAN 1820 — 4.1–5.7 260–290 0.8–1.0
LM Pitch 1500 2–4 0.6–1.0 200–250 2.0–5.0
IM Pitch 1780 4–7 — 250–350 1–2
PAN/Mesophase
HM 1820 2–4.5 1.7–3.5 350–450 0.6–0.7
pitch
UHM Mesophase pitch 2100 3 2.1–2.4 520–550 0.3–0.4

2.2.3. Boron Fibers

Boron fiber (BF) is an amorphous elemental boron outcome widely adopted in aerospace
utilization due to its high strength and lightweight characteristics [117–119]. It is fabricated
by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of boron at a temperature of 1000 ◦ C on a substrate
and obtained fiber is called boron fiber. Due to the internal residual stresses in the BF, a
significant impact on the fiber mechanical properties takes place at the time of CVD as the
boron trichloride (BCl3) is mixed with hydrogen and boron, is deposited according to the
reaction given by Equation (1).

2BCl3(g) + 3H2(g) → 2B(s) + 6HCl(g) (1)

In the transverse region of boron fiber, the radial crack would usually be observed
due to the internal stresses. The structure of the BF depends mainly on the three deposition
provisions, such as temperature, gas composition, and gas dynamics [120–122]. The dis-
advantage of boron fiber is the high cost compared to other fibers, being used mainly in
several U.S. military aircraft, especially F-14 and F-15, and in the space shuttle [123–125].
In addition, it can be used for the renovation of the metal constructions [126]. The main
applications of BFs are shown in Figure 14.
To improve fatigue crack initiation life (FCIL) and to reduce stress levels in the joint
layers, it is necessary to increase the Young’s modulus of each layer. In this regard,
Chang et al. [127] performed an experimental investigation of the fatigue crack behav-
ior of two different hybrid boron/glass/aluminum fiber/metal laminates (FML). They
observed that the inclusion of BFs has improved Young’s modulus of composite layers in
FMLs. In addition, their experimental results showed that FCIL for both FML composites
was superior to monolithic aluminum alloys under the same loading conditions. Next, an
analytical approach was suggested by the authors for the calculation of FCIL of FML based
on both the small-crack theory and the classical laminate theory. Table 8 summarizes the
main properties of the BFs [128].
 In the transverse region of boron fiber, the radial crack would usually be observed
due to the internal stresses. The structure of the BF depends mainly on the three deposi‐
tion provisions, such as temperature, gas composition, and gas dynamics [120–122]. The
disadvantage of boron fiber is the high cost compared to other fibers, being used mainly
in several U.S. military aircraft, especially F‐14 and F‐15, and in the space shuttle [123–
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 15 The
125]. In addition, it can be used for the renovation of the metal constructions [126]. of 28

main applications of BFs are shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14. Main applications related to boron fiber.

fiber.

TableTo improve
8. Main fatigue
properties of crack
boron initiation
fiber [128]. life (FCIL) and to reduce stress levels in the joint
layers, it is necessary to increase the Young’s modulus of each layer. In this regard, Chang
etProperties
al. [127] performed an experimentalUnit investigation of the fatigueValue
crack behavior of two
Tensile strength
different hybrid boron/glass/aluminum (GPa) 3–4 They observed that
fiber/metal laminates (FML).
Density
the inclusion of BFs has improved Young’s (g/cm3modulus
) 2.48–2.83
of composite layers in FMLs. In ad‐
Young’s modulus (GPa) 380–400
dition, their experimental results showed that FCIL for both FML composites was superior
Melting temperature (◦ C) 2040
toCoefficient
monolithic aluminum alloys under(◦ C
of thermal expansion
the
−1 )same loading conditions. Next, an analytical
8.3 × 10−6
approach was
Elastic modulus suggested by the authors for
(GPa) the calculation of FCIL of
379.21 FML based on both
the small‐crack
Tensile elongation theory and the classical
(%) laminate theory. Table0.9 8 summarizes the main
properties
Compression of the BFs [128].
Strength (GPa) >6
Hardness (Knoop) 3200

2.2.4. Silica Carbide Fibers

Silicon carbide (SiC) fibers are available in both alpha- and beta-SiC combinations.
They are at the same time very fine flexible continuous fibers made from multiple woven
fabrics [129–131]. The chemical structure of SiC fiber is given in Figure 15 [132].
Compared to organic and some ceramic fibers, SiC fibers have unique characteristics
such as high tensile strength, high stiffness, high modulus, high chemical resistance, low
weight, low thermal expansion, and high-temperature tolerance [133–135]. SiC fibers
have a considerably better durability compared to other fibers like carbon, glass, alumina,
and alumina silicate [136]. These fibers do not react with normal matrix alloys, as the
extraordinary fiber intensity is sustained up to 1200 ◦ C in an inert gas environment [137].
Figure 16 shows the main applications of the SiC fibers.
 Compression Strength (GPa) >6
Hardness (Knoop) 3200

2.2.4. Silica Carbide Fibers

Silicon carbide (SiC) fibers are available in both alpha‐ and beta‐SiC combinations.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 16 of 28
They are at the same time very fine flexible continuous fibers made from multiple woven
fabrics [129–131]. The chemical structure of SiC fiber is given in Figure 15 [132].

Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 29

Figure 15. Chemical structure
Figure 15. structure of
of silicon
silicon carbide
carbide fiber
fiber [132].
[132].

Compared to organic and some ceramic fibers, SiC fibers have unique characteristics
such as high tensile strength, high stiffness, high modulus, high chemical resistance, low
weight, low thermal expansion, and high‐temperature tolerance [133–135]. SiC fibers have
a considerably better durability compared to other fibers like carbon, glass, alumina, and
alumina silicate [136]. These fibers do not react with normal matrix alloys, as the extraor‐
dinary fiber intensity is sustained up to 1200 °C in an inert gas environment [137]. Figure
16 shows the main applications of the SiC fibers.
Silicon carbide fibers are fabricated in many ways, such as chemical vapor deposition
(CVD), laser‐driven CVD (LCVD), and the Yajima process. For high molecular weight
compounds, this process may vary depending on the fiber diameter [138]. In the CVD
process, the SiC fibers are relatively larger in diameter (between 80 to 140 microns), com‐
pared to the corresponding LCVD (20 to 80 microns) and Yajima (20 microns) processes.
Also, one process known as binder jetting additive manufacturing supported by polymer
infiltration and pyrolysis was employed to manufacture the SiC fiber‐reinforced compo‐
sites to improve the properties like fracture toughness, har,dness and flexural strength.

Figure16.
Figure 16.Image
Imageshowing
showingvarious
variousapplications
applicationsof
ofsilicon
siliconcarbide.
carbide.

Silicon carbide
To improve thefibers are fabricated
oxidation properties in of
many ways,
carbon such
fiber, asischemical
SiC coated on vapor deposition
the carbon sur‐
(CVD), laser-driven CVD (LCVD), and the Yajima process. For high molecular
face to be used for solar‐cell ingot‐growing containers. Currently, SiC fiber has a small weight
compounds,
market due to this process
high maycan
cost, but vary depending
exhibit on the fiber
robust behavior diameter
under [138]. In the
high temperature CVD
and ox‐
process, the SiC fibersconditions
idative environment are relatively larger in
[139–141]. Thediameter (betweenof80SiC
main properties to fibers
140 microns), com-
are presented
pared to the
in Table corresponding LCVD (20 to 80 microns) and Yajima (20 microns) processes.
9 [142].
Also, one process known as binder jetting additive manufacturing supported by polymer
infiltration and pyrolysis
Table 9. Properties was
of silicon employed
carbide to manufacture the SiC fiber-reinforced composites
fiber [142].
to improve the properties like fracture toughness, har, dness and flexural strength.
Properties
To improve the oxidation properties of carbonUnit fiber, SiC is coated on theValue
carbon surface
Density
to be used for solar-cell ingot-growing containers.(g/cm
3)
Currently, SiC fiber has 3.02
a small market
due to high
Bending cost, but can exhibit robust behavior(MPa)
strength under high temperature250 and(20 °C)
oxidative
(MPa)
environment conditions [139–141]. The main properties of SiC fibers are presented 280 (1200 °C)in
Table 9 [142]. (GPa) 330 (20 °C)
Elastic modulus
(GPa) 300 (1200 °C)
Thermal conductivity (W/mk) 45 (1200 °C)
Specific heat (J/Kg °K) 750
Thermal expansion coefficient (K−1 × 106) 4.5
Mohs hardness (−) 13
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 17 of 28

Table 9. Properties of silicon carbide fiber [142].

Properties Unit Value

Density (g/cm3 ) 3.02
(MPa) 250 (20 ◦ C)
Bending strength
(MPa) 280 (1200 ◦ C)
(GPa) 330 (20 ◦ C)
Elastic modulus
(GPa) 300 (1200 ◦ C)
Thermal conductivity (W/mk) 45 (1200 ◦ C)
Specific heat (J/Kg ◦ K) 750
Thermal expansion coefficient (K−1 × 106 ) 4.5
Mohs hardness (−) 13
Acid and alkali resistance (−) Excellent
Flexural strength (MPa) 550
Compressive strength (MPa) 3900
Volume resistivity (Ohm cm) 102 –106
Maximum service temperature (◦ C) 1650

Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 18 of 29

3. Failure Modes in FRP Composites
The main causes underlying the failure in FRP composites are represented by delami-
nation, debonding, micro-cracking of the matrix, and breaking of fibers. As presented in
Figure 17,
Figure 17, the
the fracture
fracture modes
modes in
in FRP
FRP composites
composites can
can be
be divided
divided into
into three
three basic
basic fracture
fracture
types: inter‐laminar, intra‐laminar, and trans‐laminar [143].
types: inter-laminar, intra-laminar, and trans-laminar [143].

Figure 17.
Figure 17. Delamination
Delamination and
and cracks
cracks directions
directions [143].
[143].

delamination failure
The delamination failure modes,
modes, as
as shown
shown in Figure 18, are normally categorized into
mode I, mode
mode mode II,
II, mode
mode III,
III, and
and mixed-mode
mixed‐mode(I(I ++ II, I + III, and
and II ++III)
III)delamination
delamination modes,
modes,
according to thethe principal
principalstresses
stressesappearing
appearingonon thethe interface
interface [144–146].
[144–146]. If considering
If considering the
the failure
failure on micro‐scale
on the the micro-scale inter-laminar
inter‐laminar and intra-laminar
and intra‐laminar fracture
fracture typestypes
can becan be char‐
thus thus
characterized.
acterized.
In both inter-laminar and intra-laminar failure modes, fracture occurs on a plane
parallel to that of the fiber reinforcement. The fracture of each type can occur under pure
mode I (opening/tensile-mode cracks), mode II (sliding/in-plane shear), and mode III
(tearing/out-of-plane shear), or under a mixed mode (I + II, I + III, II + III) [148,149]. Trans-
laminar fractures are those located transverse to the laminated plane in which conditions
of fiber fractures are created [150]. Manshadi et al. [151] had correlated the experimental
results with computations of a semi-empirical basis by the plotting of the total critical
strain energy release rate, and very good results were found i.e., total critical strain energy
release rate increases as a function of mode II/total critical strain energy release rate with
semi-empirical criterion exponents applied to delamination initiation and growth (mC)

(a) (b) (c)

 Figure 17. Delamination and cracks directions [143].
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 18 of 28
The delamination failure modes, as shown in Figure 18, are normally categorized
mode I, mode II, mode III, and mixed‐mode (I + II, I + III, and II + III) delamination mo
according to the principal stresses appearing on the interface [144–146]. If considerin
= 2.6, whereas total fracture resistance versus mode II/total critical strain energy release
failure on the micro‐scale inter‐laminar and intra‐laminar fracture types can be thus
rate modal ratio is linear with semi-empirical criterion exponents applied to delamination
acterized.
initiation and growth (mR) = 1.

Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 19 of 29

(a) (b) (c)

modal ratio is linear with semi‐empirical criterion exponents applied to delamination in‐
Figure
Crack 18. Crack
opening modes:opening modes: Mode I or opening/tensile‐mode cracks (a), Mode II or slidin
Figure 18.and
itiation growth (mR) = 1. Mode I or opening/tensile-mode cracks (a), Mode II or sliding/in-
plane shear (b),plane shear III
and Mode (b),orand Mode III or tearing/out‐of‐plane
tearing/out-of-plane shear (c) [147].shear (c) [147].
3.1. Delamination
3.1. Delamination In both inter‐laminar and intra‐laminar failure modes, fracture occurs on a plane
Delamination
Delamination isthat
allel tois aa mode
mode
of the of failure
of failure
fiber inwhich
whichmaterial
reinforcement.
in material fracturesof
The fractures
fracture into
each
into layers,
typeas
layers, as
can shown
occur under
shown
in Figure 19. It
modeis a critical
I failure mode
(opening/tensile‐mode in composite
in Figure 19. It is a critical failure mode in composite structures, not significant because ititand mod
cracks), structures,
mode II not significant
(sliding/in‐plane because
shear),
willprompt
will promptthe the structureto
(tearing/out‐of‐plane
structure tofracture
fracture intotwo
shear),
into two ormore
or under
or more pieces,
a mixed
pieces,modebutbecause
but because
(I + II, I +ititIII,
can
can +discredit
IIdiscredit
III) [148,149]. T
the laminate to such
laminar a degree
fractures that
are it
those fits ineffective
located in
transverseservice
to the
the laminate to such a degree that it fits ineffective in service [152,153]. The interfacial[152,153].
laminated Theplaneinterfacial
in which condi
detachment produced by
of fiber fractures
detachment produced the delamination
by the are created [150].
delamination may
may begin
Manshadiwith
begin with too early
et al.too
[151] buckling
earlyhadbuckling of
correlated theoflam‐
the
the experim
inate, extreme
laminate, extreme vibration,
results the interference
with computations
vibration, the interference of
of ofmoisture, stiffness
a semi‐empirical
moisture, stiffness degeneration,
basis by the plotting
degeneration, and lack
of the
and lack of total cr
of
fatigue life. Delamination
strain energymay
fatigue life. Delamination may be
release advanced
rate, and very
be advanced during
duringgoodin‐service conditions.
results were
in-service found It
conditions. It
i.e.,may
maytotal transpire
critical strain en
transpire
fromlow-velocity
from low‐velocity
release impact,
impact, fromfrom
rate increases peculiarities
as a function
peculiarities inofstructural
in the the
modestructural
II/total load pathway
load critical
pathway strain thatcause
that energy
may may
release rate
cause great out‐of‐plane
semi‐empirical
great out-of-plane stress [154,155].stress [154,155].
criterion exponents applied to delamination initiation and growth (m
2.6, whereas total fracture resistance versus mode II/total critical strain energy release

Figure 19. Separation

Figure19. Separationof
ofadjacent
adjacentlayers
layersdue
dueto
toweakening
weakeningof
ofinterface
interfacelayer
layerbetween
betweenthem.
them.

Analyzing
Analyzing mechanical
mechanical loads,
loads, the
the moisture
moisture and
and temperature
temperature may may also
also produce
produce inter-
inter‐
laminar stresses in a laminate. It is due to the effects of the residual thermal
laminar stresses in a laminate. It is due to the effects of the residual thermal stresses stresses
gen‐
generated by cooling
erated by cooling from from treating
treating temperatures
temperatures andand residual
residual stresses
stresses produced
produced bycon‐
by the the
consumption of moisture. The delamination may lead to the redistribution
sumption of moisture. The delamination may lead to the redistribution of stresses, which of stresses,
which ultimately
ultimately improves
improves total failure.
total failure. The strain
The strain energy
energy released
released by propagation
by the the propagation
of aofde‐
a
delamination
lamination ofof length
length a to
a to + ∆a
a +a Δa is is given
given byby Equation
Equation (2),
(2), asas follows
follows [156]:
[156]:
Z a+ ∆a Z ∆a/2 /
1 1
W =𝑊 σ(σx,x,y)yδ(δx x− ∆a,
Δa,yy)dx
dxdy
dy (2)
(2)
2 a 2 − ∆a/2 /

where δ(x − Δa)—crack opening displacement, σ(x,y)—stress at the crack front required
to close the delaminated area.
Benzeggagh and Kenane [157] evaluated the delamination growth in a unidirectional
glass/epoxy composite under mode I, II and mixed mode I/II static loading configuration.
The authors expressed the properties in terms of the total fracture resistance and the total
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 19 of 28

where δ(x − ∆a)—crack opening displacement, σ(x,y)—stress at the crack front required to
close the delaminated area.
Benzeggagh and Kenane [157] evaluated the delamination growth in a unidirectional
glass/epoxy composite under mode I, II and mixed mode I/II static loading configuration.
The authors expressed the properties in terms of the total fracture resistance and the total
critical strain energy release rate. Moreover, the experimental data were correlated with
computations of a semi-empirical criterion. Furthermore, Berthelot [158] reviewed the
delamination process in cross-ply FRP laminates under static and fatigue loading. In order
to develop different models for evaluating the stress distribution in the damaged FRP
laminates, the author used various experimental data. Berthelot [158] models, associated
with the statistical description of strength or energy, allow describing the development of
transverse cracks in monotonic or fatigue loading.

3.2. Fiber Pull-Out and Debonding

Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 20 of 29
The fiber pull-out is one of the failure mechanisms that can occur in FRP composite
materials. Weak bonding is the main cause of fiber pull-out and delamination. The cracks
on the fibers are not injured at the leading distance but in the high-stress zone near the tip,
tip, they
they are broken
are broken andand quickly
quickly behind
behind the the crack
crack tip fibers
tip fibers pullpull
outout of the
of the matrix
matrix as shown
as shown in
in Figure 20 [159].
Figure 20 [159].

Figure 20.
Figure 20. Fiber
Fiber pull-out
pull‐out and
and debonding.
debonding.

In the case of some FRP composites, before they collapse, the stress
In stress near the crack tip
cause aa debonding
may cause debonding of the the fibers
fibers from
from the
the matrix
matrix material.
material. On the other hand,
hand, if
if the
the
are brittle
fibers are brittle and
and well
well bonded
bonded to to aa ductile
ductile matrix,
matrix, the fibers
fibers tend
tend to
to fasten
fasten forward
forward of of
crack tip,
the crack tip, moving
moving bridges
bridges of matrix
matrix that
that pet
pet down
down and and shatter
shatter in
in aa perfectly
perfectly ductile
ductile
manner.
manner.
addition to
In addition to mentioned
mentioned local
local failure
failure mechanisms,
mechanisms, on entering
entering the interface
interface of the
the
two
two laminate
laminatein inaaFRP
FRPlaminated
laminatedcomposite,
composite, a crack
a crackcancan
split andand
split propagate
propagatealong withwith
along the
interface, thusthus
the interface, offering the delamination
offering the delamination crack [159,160].
crack [159,160].
Work
Work debonding
debonding isiscalculated
calculatedusing
usingEquation
Equation(3) (3)[161]:
[161]:

πd𝜋𝑑
2 σ2𝜎
f ld
𝑙
W𝑊
(3)
d = 24𝐸
24E f
(3)

where d—fiber diameter, 𝜎 —failure strength of the fiber, 𝑙 —length of the debonded
2
zone, 𝐸d—fiber
where modulus.σ f —failure strength of the fiber, ld —length of the debonded zone,
—fiberdiameter,
E f —fiber modulus.
3.3. Microcracking
3.3. Microcracking
Microcracking is the very small cracks in the composites that are not visible to the
nakedMicrocracking is theform
eye. The primary veryofsmall cracks
damage in the composites
in laminates that are
is often matrix not visible toThey
microcracking. the
naked eye. The primary form of damage in laminates is often matrix microcracking.
are intra‐laminar fractures that traverse the width of the layer and move laterally to the They
fibers. The common noticeable microcracking is cracking in the 90° plies through axial
loading in the 0° direction as shown in Figure 21 [162]. These microcracks are transverse
to the loading direction and are often referred to as transverse cracks. Microcracks may be
recognized during fatigue loading, tensile loading, thermo‐cycling and during changes in
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 20 of 28

are intra-laminar fractures that traverse the width of the layer and move laterally to the
fibers. The common noticeable microcracking is cracking in the 90◦ plies through axial
loading in the 0◦ direction as shown in Figure 21 [162]. These microcracks are transverse to
the loading direction and are often referred to as transverse cracks. Microcracks may be
recognized during fatigue loading, tensile loading, thermo-cycling and during changes
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 21 of in
29
temperature. Microcracks can develop in several plies but mainly they are exposed in the
implies off-axis to the loading axis.

Figure 21.
Figure 21. Microcracking
Microcracking types.
types.

quickeffect
The quick effectofof
thethe microcracks
microcracks is toisgenerate
to generate degeneration
degeneration in thein the thermo‐me‐
thermo-mechanical
chanical characteristics
characteristics of theincluding
of the laminate laminate variations
including in variations in all
all practical practicalThe
modules. modules. The
extra harm-
extra
ful harmful
effect of theeffect of the microcracks
microcracks is that theyiscreate
that they
othercreate
formsother forms of
of damage damage
such such as
as induction
of delamination,
induction fiber cracking,
of delamination, or afford or
fiber cracking, pathways for the entrance
afford pathways of corrosive
for the entrance liquids.
of corrosive
Such damage
liquids. modes may
Such damage modes consequently begin tobegin
may consequently laminate failure. The
to laminate primary,
failure. microc-
The primary,
rack produces
microcrack surprisingly
produces few differences
surprisingly in the in
few differences thermo-mechanical
the thermo‐mechanical characteristics of
characteris‐
the laminate. Further loading normally starts as extra microcracks and
tics of the laminate. Further loading normally starts as extra microcracks and supplemen‐ supplementary
microcracks
tary microcracksand continues degeneration
and continues in theinthermo-mechanical
degeneration the thermo‐mechanical characteristics. The
characteristics.
changes
The changesin theintemperature
the temperature influence residual
influence stress
residual within
stress the plies
within and and
the plies therefore can
therefore
begin micro-cracking
can begin micro‐cracking[162].[162].

4.
4. Fiber/Matrix
Fiber/Matrix Interface
Interface and
and Surface
Surface Treatment
Treatment
4.1. Fiber/Matrix Interface
4.1. Fiber/Matrix Interface
A line that divides fiber/matrix in a physically distinct and separable phase is termed
A line that divides fiber/matrix in a physically distinct and separable phase is termed
an interface as shown in Figure 22. The fiber/matrix interface represents a very significant
an interface as shown in Figure 22. The fiber/matrix interface represents a very significant
performance in predicting the macroscopic mechanical properties of the composites.
While analyzing the interaction between fiber/matrix in the composite, 2‐dimensional in‐
terphases are considered. At the time of discovering the properties of the composites, fi‐
ber/matrix properties such as the debonding strength and sliding resistance perform a
 Materials 2022, 15, 4790 21 of 28

performance in predicting the macroscopic mechanical properties of the composites. While

analyzing the interaction between fiber/matrix in the composite, 2-dimensional interphases
are considered. At the time of discovering the properties of the composites, fiber/matrix
properties
Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW such as the debonding strength and sliding resistance perform a dominant22 ofrole.
29
The commonly employed technique for measuring fiber/matrix properties is fiber push-out
testing [163].

Figure
Figure22.
22.Fiber/matrix
Fiber/matrixinterface.
interface.

Following
Followingare
arethe
thetechnique
techniquefor
formeasuring
measuringfiber/matrix
fiber/matrixproperties
propertiesininthe
thecomposites:
composites:
y- Directmethods:
Direct methods:Single‐fiber
Single-fiberpullout
pullouttests,
tests,Multiple‐fiber
Multiple-fiberpullout
pullouttests,
tests,Fiber
Fiberfragmen‐
fragmen-
tationtests,
tation tests,and
andMicro‐indentation
Micro-indentationpush‐in
push-intests.
tests.
y- Indirectmethod:
Indirect method:Short‐beam
Short-beamshear
shearstrength
strengthtest,
test,Inter‐laminar
Inter-laminarshear
shearstrength
strengthtests.
tests.

4.2.Surface
4.2. SurfaceTreatment
Treatment
Thesurface
The surfacetreatment
treatmentisisusually
usuallyperformed
performedininthe
thecomposite
compositematerial
materialtotoreduce
reducethethe
weak boundary layers, developed wetting of low-energy surfaces, and chemical
weak boundary layers, developed wetting of low‐energy surfaces, and chemical modifi‐ modifi-
cation.The
cation. Thesurface
surfacetreatment
treatmentintends
intendstotomodify
modifythe
themorphology
morphologyofofa athin
thinsurface
surfacelayer
layer
without altering the bulk characteristics.
without altering the bulk characteristics.
Thefollowing
The followingarearethe
themost
mostsignificant
significantsurface
surfacemodification
modificationtechniques
techniquesused
usedfor
forbetter
better
mechanicalperformance
mechanical performance[163]:
[163]:
 Chemicalmodification
Chemical modificationthrough
throughtreatment,
treatment,CAs,
CAs,and
andfunctionalization;
functionalization;
 Chemical modification through
Chemical modification through etching;etching;
 Chemicalmodification
Chemical modificationthrough
throughgrafting;
grafting;
 Physical modification through surface
Physical modification through surface tensiontensionand
andenergy
energycompatibilization;
compatibilization;
 Radio-frequency (RF) sputtering, chemical vapor deposition,
Radio‐frequency (RF) sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, physical physicalvapor
vapordeposi‐
deposi-
tion, and plasma-assisted
tion, and plasma‐assisted CVD; CVD;
 Coldspray
Cold sprayforforlow‐temperature
low-temperaturepolymers;
polymers;
 Electrolytic, electro-less, and dip coatings;
 Electrolytic, electro‐less, and dip coatings;
 Physicochemical techniques as a combination of these techniques;
 Physicochemical techniques as a combination of these techniques;
 Stem cell culture, cloning, and growth on unmodified or modified substrates;
 Stem cell culture, cloning, and growth on unmodified or modified substrates;
 Laser, electron, plasma, infrared, and x-ray irradiation techniques to modify surfaces;
 Laser, electron, plasma, infrared, and x‐ray irradiation techniques to modify surfaces;
 Ultrasound, RF, and microwave sonication;
 Ultrasound, RF, and microwave sonication;
 Surface static charge and conductivity modifications;
 Surface static charge and conductivity modifications;
 Surface roughness, texture, and topography modifications for mechanical adhesion;
 Surface roughness, texture, and topography modifications for mechanical adhesion;
 Neutron chemical transmutation doping of the reinforcement surface;
 Neutron chemical transmutation doping of the reinforcement surface;
 Diffusion processes, surface-selective hardening, and softening techniques;
 Diffusion processes, surface‐selective hardening, and softening techniques;
 Transverse fibrillation for superior bonding, phase transition modifications, and
 Transverse
skinning andfibrillation
cladding;for superior bonding, phase transition modifications, and
 skinning and cladding;
Preferred polymorphic and allotropic transformations that contribute to strengthening;
 Preferred
Weaving,polymorphic and allotropic
stitching, knitting, transformations
and braiding to improve that contribute
transverse to strengthen‐
flow and provide
ing;
more surface area, wettability, and percolation of the matrix;
 Weaving, stitching, knitting, and braiding to improve transverse flow and provide
more surface area, wettability, and percolation of the matrix;
 Coefficient of thermal expansion matching with the matrix for accommodative inter‐
facial behavior;
 Sizing, thermal, and water boiling treatment;
 Vacuum and hot vacuum degassing to remove contamination; and
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 22 of 28

 Coefficient of thermal expansion matching with the matrix for accommodative inter-
facial behavior;
 Sizing, thermal, and water boiling treatment;
 Vacuum and hot vacuum degassing to remove contamination; and
 Thermo-oxidative adhesive coatings to improve interfacial thermal stability.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

The properties of SFs depend on the type of used fiber and its manufacturing process.
Because, compared to conventional metals, SFs have superior mechanical, tribological,
thermal, and chemical durability, their use for various purposes has been continuously
increasing worldwide. Depending upon the chemical composition, SFs are categorized
into organic, inorganic fibers, and others. Since ancient times organic fibers are found in
our daily applications. On the other hand, compared to organic fibers, inorganic fibers are
recently developed and have been shown to have remarkable properties, thus having a
high potential for future research.
The main advantages of SFs are long-lasting, stretchable, waterproofing, moisture
resistance, strain and wear resistance; while they also have many disadvantages such as
being flammable, not being suitable for hot washing, cause for microplastic pollution,
having poor insulation capacity, melting easily, being prone to heat damage, and not being
eco-friendly. For the SFs to be used to their maximum potential they must be compatible
with the matrix, to have physical and mechanical properties superior to the matrix, to
present the optimal orientation in composite, and to make chemical or adhesion bonds
with the matrix.
The biggest challenge facing manufacturers in terms of SF is its non-biodegradability
and lower melting point. Due to such safety and environmental concern, SFs are lagging
behind in the market. There is a great opportunity to focus on the research of SFs for the
development of more technologies to provide better technical and safety features. Moreover,
important attention should be paid to the integration of useful changes in SFs with less
or no harmful influence on the environment some important attention has to be made. In
response to these challenges, studies should be focused on SF-reinforced bioplastics, plastic
nanocomposites, self-healing polymers, plastic electronics, smart and reactive polymers.
Ongoing cross-disciplinary research will improve the biodegradation and biorecycling
options of SFs.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, D.K.R.; methodology, D.K.R. and P.H.W.; investigation,

D.K.R. and E.L.; data curation, D.K.R., P.H.W. and E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.R.,
P.H.W. and E.L.; writing—review and editing, D.K.R., P.H.W. and E.L. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and
Digitalization, project number PFE 26/30.12.2021, PERFORM-CDI@UPT100—The increasing of the
performance of the Polytechnic University of Timis, oara by strengthening the research, development
and technological transfer capacity in the field of Energy, “Environment and Climate Change” at the
beginning of the second century of its existence, within Program 1—Development of the national
system of Research and Development, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional Performance—Institutional
Development Projects—Excellence Funding Projects in RDI, PNCDI III.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the
corresponding author, [Emanoil Linul], upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 23 of 28

References
1. Ahmad, J.; Majdi, A.; Al-Fakih, A.; Deifalla, A.F.; Althoey, F.; El Ouni, M.H.; El-Shorbagy, M.A. Mechanical and Durability
Performance of Coconut Fiber Reinforced Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review. Materials 2022, 15, 3601. [CrossRef]
2. Andrzejewski, J.; Gapiński, B.; Islam, A.; Szostak, M. The Influence of the Hybridization Process on the Mechanical and Thermal
Properties of Polyoxymethylene (POM) Composites with the Use of a Novel Sustainable Reinforcing System Based on Biocarbon
and Basalt Fiber (BC/BF). Materials 2020, 13, 3496. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Olszewski, A.; Kosmela, P.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A.; Piszczyk, Ł. Bio-Based Polyurethane Composites and Hybrid Composites
Containing a New Type of Bio-Polyol and Addition of Natural and Synthetic Fibers. Materials 2020, 13, 2028. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Camargo, M.M.; Adefrs Taye, E.; Roether, J.A.; Tilahun Redda, D.; Boccaccini, A.R. A Review on Natural Fiber-Reinforced
Geopolymer and Cement-Based Composites. Materials 2020, 13, 4603. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Bhudolia, S.K.; Gohel, G.; Leong, K.F.; Islam, A. Advances in Ultrasonic Welding of Thermoplastic Composites: A Review.
Materials 2020, 13, 1284. [CrossRef]
6. Sujon, A.S.; Islam, A.; Nadimpalli, V.K. Damping and sound absorption properties of polymer matrix composites: A review.
Polym. Test. 2021, 104, 107388. [CrossRef]
7. Kirmasha, Y.K.; Sharba, M.J.; Leman, Z.; Sultan, M.T.H. Mechanical Performance of Unstitched and Silk Fiber-Stitched Woven
Kenaf Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Materials 2020, 13, 4801. [CrossRef]
8. Kampa, Ł.; Sadowski, Ł.; Królicka, A. The use of synthetic and natural fibers in epoxy coatings: A comparative mechanical and
economic analysis. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2021, 117, 103017. [CrossRef]
9. Baji, A.; Mai, Y.W.; Du, X.S.; Wong, S.C. Improved Tensile Strength and Ferroelectric Phase Content of Self-Assembled Polyvinyli-
dene Fluoride Fiber Yarns. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, 297, 209–213. [CrossRef]
10. Li, Y.; Gora, A.; Anariba, F.; Baji, A. Enhanced tensile strength and electrical conductivity of electrospun polyacrylonitrile Yarns
via post-treatment. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 1702–1707. [CrossRef]
11. Sahay, R.; Agarwal, K.; Subramani, A.; Raghavan, N.; Budiman, A.S.; Baji, A. Helicoidally Arranged Polyacrylonitrile Fiber-
Reinforced Strong and Impact-Resistant Thin Polyvinyl Alcohol Film Enabled by Electrospinning-Based Additive Manufacturing.
Polymers 2020, 12, 2376. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Watts, M.J.; Amin, A.; Bernard, E.S.; Gilbert, R.I.; Facconi, L. Early age bond stress-slip behaviour of macro-synthetic fibre
reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124097. [CrossRef]
13. Agarwal, K.; Sahay, R.; Baji, A. Tensile Properties of Composite Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Printed Fibers. Polymers 2020,
12, 1089. [CrossRef]
14. Rajak, D.K.; Pagar, D.D.; Menezes, P.L.; Linul, E. Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: Manufacturing, Properties, and
Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Mohan, K.A.; Dimple, A.N.; Ashokavel, S.; Boopathi, M. Numerical investigation of mechanical properties of hybrid fiber
reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 52, 2255–2263. [CrossRef]
16. Agarwal, K.; Sahay, R.; Baji, A.; Budiman, A.S. Impact Resistant and Tough Helicoidally Aligned Ribbon Reinforced Composite
with Tunable Mechanical Properties via Integrated Additive Manufacturing Methodologies. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2,
3491–3504. [CrossRef]
17. Siamardi, K.; Shabani, S. Evaluation the effect of micro-synthetic fiber on mechanical and freeze-thaw behavior of non-air-
entrained roller compacted concrete pavement using response surface methodology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 295, 123628.
[CrossRef]
18. Manteghi, S.; Sarwar, A.; Fawaz, Z.; Zdero, R.; Bougherara, H. Mechanical characterization of the static and fatigue compressive
properties of a new glass/flax/epoxy composite material using digital image correlation, thermographic stress analysis, and
conventional mechanical testing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 99, 940–950. [CrossRef]
19. Yoo, D.Y.; Kim, S.; Park, G.J.; Park, J.J. Residual performance of HPFRCC exposed to fire—Effects of matrix strength, synthetic
fiber, and fire duration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 118038. [CrossRef]
20. Di Maida, P.; Sciancalepore, C.; Radi, E.; Bondioli, F. Effects of nano-silica treatment on the flexural post cracking behaviour of
polypropylene macro-synthetic fibre reinforced concrete. Mech. Res. Commun. 2018, 88, 12–18. [CrossRef]
21. Begum, S.; Fawzia, S.; Hashmi, M.S.J. Polymer matrix composite with natural and synthetic fibres. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol.
2020, 6, 547–564. [CrossRef]
22. Nandana, B.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347.
23. Won, J.P.; Lim, D.H.; Park, C.G. Bond behaviour and flexural performance of structural synthetic fibre-reinforced concrete. Mag.
Concr. Res. 2006, 58, 401–410. [CrossRef]
24. Camille, C.; Kahagala Hewage, D.; Mirza, O.; Mashiri, F.; Kirkland, B.; Clarke, T. Performance behaviour of macro-synthetic
fibre reinforced concrete subjected to static and dynamic loadings for sleeper applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 270, 121469.
[CrossRef]
25. Hagewood, J. Technologies for the manufacture of synthetic polymer fibers. In Advances in Filament Yarn Spinning of Textiles and
Polymers; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2014; pp. 48–71.
26. Hluzek, R.; Trejbal, J.; Nezerka, V.; Demo, P.; Prosek, Z.; Tesarek, P. Improvement of bonding between synthetic fibers and a
cementitious matrix using recycled concrete powder and plasma treatment: From a single fiber to FRC. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng.
2020, 26, 3880–3897. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 24 of 28

27. Babafemi, A.J.; Du Plessis, A.; Boshoff, W.P. Pull-out creep mechanism of synthetic macro fibres under a sustained load. Constr.
Build. Mater. 2018, 174, 466–473. [CrossRef]
28. Shrivastava, A. 2—Polymerization. In Introduction to Plastics Engineering; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2018;
pp. 17–48. [CrossRef]
29. Warheit, D.B.; Hart, G.A.; Hesterberg, T.W.; Collins, J.J.; Dyer, W.M.; Swaen, G.M.H.; Castranova, V.; Soiefer, A.I.; Kennedy, G.L.
Potential Pulmonary Effects of Man-Made Organic Fiber (MMOF) Dusts. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2001, 31, 697–736. [CrossRef]
30. Goh, G.D.; Yap, Y.L.; Agarwala, S.; Yeong, W.Y. Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer
Composite. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 4, 1800271. [CrossRef]
31. Rajesh, S.; Vijayaramnath, B.; Elanchezhian, C.; Vivek, S.; Prasadh, M.H.; Kesavan, M. Experimental Investigation of Tensile and
Impact Behavior of Aramid-Natural Fiber Composite. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 16, 699–705. [CrossRef]
32. Bazan, P.; Nosal, P.; Wierzbicka-Miernik, A.; Kuciel, S. A novel hybrid composites based on biopolyamide 10.10 with basalt/aramid
fibers: Mechanical and thermal investigation. Compos. Part B 2021, 223, 109125. [CrossRef]
33. Downing, J.W.; Newell, J.A. Characterization of structural changes in thermally enhanced Kevlar-29 fiber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
2003, 91, 417–424. [CrossRef]
34. Yuan, W.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. Mechanical properties of a novel Tri-directional carbon-flax-aramid fiber reinforced composite. Compos.
Sci. Technol. 2021, 213, 108923. [CrossRef]
35. Louwsma, J.; Carvalho, A.; Lutz, J.-F.; Joly, S.; Chan-Seng, D. Adsorption of phenylalanine-rich sequence-defined oligomers onto
Kevlar fibers for fiber-reinforced polyolefin composite materials. Polymer 2021, 217, 123465. [CrossRef]
36. Şahin, K.; Clawson, J.K.; Singletary, J.; Chasiotis, I. Shear strength of homopolymer and copolymer aramid fibers. Polymer 2019,
186, 122034. [CrossRef]
37. Sabu, T.; Jiji, A.; Ajithkumar, M.P.; Asha, K. Composite Materials, In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken,
NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–44.
38. Norwood, L.S.; Marchant, A. Recent Developments in Polyester Matrices and Reinforcements for Marine Applications. In
Particular Polyester/Kevlar Composites, Polyester Matrices and Reinforcements for Marine Applications; Marshall, I.H., Ed.; Composite
Structures © Applied Science Publishers Ltd.: Dordecht, The Netherlands, 1981.
39. Jassal, M.; Agrawal, A.K.; Gupta, D.; Panwar, K. Aramid Fibers. In Handbook of Fibrous Materials; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020;
pp. 207–231.
40. Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, J.; Gao, C.; Van der Bruggen, B. The potential of Kevlar aramid nanofiber composite membranes. J. Mater.
Chem. A 2020, 8, 7548–7568. [CrossRef]
41. Gao, J.; Yang, X.; Guo, J.; Huang, J. Hyperelastic mechanical properties of chopped aramid fiber-reinforced rubber composite
under finite strain. Compos. Struct. 2020, 243, 112187. [CrossRef]
42. Yeung, K.H.; Rao, K.P. Mechanical Properties of Kevlar-49 Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. Polym. Polym. Compos.
2012, 20, 411–424. [CrossRef]
43. Arvinte, C.; Sandu, A.V.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.D.; Bernevig Sava, M.A.; Bejinariu, C. Technical requirements and materials used in
firefighters gloves manufacturing. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 572, 012070. [CrossRef]
44. El-Morsy, M.A. A simulation study on investigation the optical and structural properties of polyethylene fiber. Results Phys. 2020,
18, 103230. [CrossRef]
45. Dun, M.; Fu, H.; Hao, J.; Shan, W.; Wang, W. Tailoring flexible interphases in bamboo fiber-reinforced linear low-density
polyethylene composites. Compos. Part A 2021, 150, 106606. [CrossRef]
46. Roedel, M.J. The Molecular Structure of Polyethylene. I. Chain Branching in Polyethylene during Polymerization. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1953, 75, 6110–6112. [CrossRef]
47. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Qin, Z.; Yan, R.; Jia, L. Characterization of macroscopic impact-resistant behavior of shear thickening fluid
impregnated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber flexible composites. Compos. Commun. 2021, 25, 100756. [CrossRef]
48. Peacock, A. Handbook of Polyethylene: Structures: Properties, and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000.
49. Liu, T.; Bai, R.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y. Tailoring of polyethylene fiber surface by coating silane coupling agent for strain
hardening cementitious composite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 278, 122263. [CrossRef]
50. Choi, H.-J.; Yoo, D.-Y.; Park, G.-J.; Park, J.-J. Photocatalytic high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites with white
Portland cement, titanium dioxide, and surface treated polyethylene fibers. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 785–800. [CrossRef]
51. Jegatheesan, N.; Rengarasu, T.M.; Bandara, W.M.K.R.T.W. Mechanical properties of modified hot mix asphalt containing
polyethylene terephthalate fibers as binder additive and carbonized wood particles as fine aggregate replacement. Asian Transp.
Stud. 2020, 6, 100029. [CrossRef]
52. Kasirajan, S.; Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev.
2012, 32, 501–529. [CrossRef]
53. Le, D.K.; Ng, G.N.; Koh, H.W.; Zhang, X.; Thai, Q.B.; Phan-Thien, N.; Duong, H.M. Methyltrimethoxysilane-coated recycled
polyethylene terephthalate aerogels for oil spill cleaning applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 239, 122064. [CrossRef]
54. Vinoth, A.; Datta, S. Design of the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites with multiple nanoparticles: An artificial
intelligence approach. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 54, 179–192. [CrossRef]
55. Xia, L.; Wu, H.; Qiu, G. Shape memory behavior of carbon nanotube-reinforced trans-1,4-polyisoprene and low-density polyethy-
lene composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 31, 107–113. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 25 of 28

56. Peng, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, A. A novel modification of carbon nanotubes for improving the electrical and mechanical properties of
polyethylene composites. Polym. Test. 2019, 74, 72–76. [CrossRef]
57. Ahmed, D.S.; Illias, H.; Ang, B.; Abdul Latiff, N.; Makmud, M. Electrical Properties of Polyethylene/Polypropylene Compounds
for High-Voltage Insulation. Energies 2018, 11, 1448. [CrossRef]
58. Morshedian, J.; Khonakdar, H.A.; Mehrabzadeh, M.; Eslami, H. Preparation and properties of heat-shrinkable cross-linked
low-density polyethylene. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2003, 22, 112–119. [CrossRef]
59. Militký, J. Tensile failure of polyester fibers. In Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston,
UK, 2018; pp. 421–514. [CrossRef]
60. Chen, S.; Lu, W.; Han, J.; Zhong, H.; Xu, T.; Wang, G.; Chen, W. Robust three-dimensional g-C3N4@cellulose aerogel enhanced by
cross-linked polyester fibers for simultaneous removal of hexavalent chromium and antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 359, 119–129.
[CrossRef]
61. Liu, B.-W.; Lei, Y.-F.; Liu, X.-F.; Guo, D.-M.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.-Z. Thermally induced end-group-capturing as an eco-friendly and
general method for enhancing the fire safety of semi-aromatic polyesters. Polymer 2021, 218, 123430. [CrossRef]
62. Jaffe, M.; Easts, A.J.; Feng, X. Polyester fibers. In Thermal Analysis of Textiles and Fibers; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2020;
pp. 133–149. [CrossRef]
63. Nguyen-Tri, P. Nanoscale analysis of the photodegradation of Polyester fibers by AFM-IR. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018,
371, 196–204. [CrossRef]
64. Rostami, R.; Zarrebini, M.; Mandegari, M.; Mostofinejad, D.; Abtahi, S.M. A review on performance of polyester fibers in alkaline
and cementitious composites environments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 117998. [CrossRef]
65. Yang, F.; Bai, Y.; Min, B.; Kumar, S.; Polk, M. Synthesis and properties of star-like wholly aromatic polyester fibers. Polymer 2003,
44, 3837–3846. [CrossRef]
66. Ferrante, L. Product Design and Testing of Polymeric Materials; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020.
67. Schneider, U.; Jarre, G.; Zaplatilek, M.; Jaeger, A. Textile Flat Structure for Electrical Insulation. U.S. Patent No. 16/611,865, 8 May
2020.
68. Sloan, F. Liquid crystal aromatic polyester-arylate (LCP) fibers. In Structure and Properties of High-Performance Fibers; Woodhead
Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2017; pp. 113–140.
69. Hufenus, R.; Yan, Y.; Dauner, M.; Kikutani, T. Melt-Spun Fibers for Textile Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4298. [CrossRef]
70. Liu, X.F.; Liu, B.W.; Luo, X.; Guo, D.M.; Zhong, H.Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.Z. A novel phosphorus-containing semi-aromatic polyester
toward flame retardancy and enhanced mechanical properties of epoxy resin. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 380, 122471. [CrossRef]
71. Thomas, S.; Visakh, P.M. Polyethers and Polyesters. In Handbook of Engineering and Specialty Thermoplastics; John Wiley & Sons:
Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 3, p. 68.
72. Wang, W.C.; Zhou, B.; Xu, S.H.; Yang, Z.M.; Zhang, Q.Y. Recent advances in soft optical glass fiber and fiber lasers. Prog. Mater.
Sci. 2018, 101, 90–171. [CrossRef]
73. David, W. Dwight, Fiber reinforcements and general theory of composites. In Comprehensive Composite Materials; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 231–261. ISBN 0-080437192.
74. Thomason, J.L. Glass Fibre Sizing: A Review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 127, 105619. [CrossRef]
75. Silva, C.F.; Cabral, L.C.; Navarro de Oliveira, M.; da Mota Martins, V.; Machado, A.C.; Blumenberg, C.; Santos-Filho, P.C.F. The
influence of customization of glass fiber posts on fracture strength and failure pattern: A systematic review and meta-analysis of
preclinical ex-vivo studies. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 118, 104433. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Cooke, T.F. Inorganic Fibers-A Literature Review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 74, 2959–2978. [CrossRef]
77. Shahari, S.; Fathullah, M.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Shayfull, Z.; Mia, M.; Budi Darmawan, V.E. Recent developments in fire retardant
glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite and geopolymer as a potential fire-retardant material: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021,
277, 122246. [CrossRef]
78. Rani, M.; Choudhary, P.; Krishnan, V.; Zafar, S. A review on recycling and reuse methods for carbon fiber/glass fiber composites
waste from wind turbine blades. Compos. Part B 2021, 215, 108768. [CrossRef]
79. Sherif, G.; Chukov, D.; Tcherdyntsev, V.; Torokhov, V. Effect of Formation Route on the Mechanical Properties of the Poly-
ethersulfone Composites Reinforced with Glass Fibers. Polymers 2019, 11, 1364. [CrossRef]
80. Larlus, O.; Valtchev, V.; Patarin, J.; Faust, A.C.; Maquin, B. Preparation of silicalite-1/glass fiber composites by one- and two-step
hydrothermal syntheses. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 56, 175–184. [CrossRef]
81. Sathishkumar, T.; Satheeshkumar, S.; Naveen, J. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites—A review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos.
2014, 33, 1258–1275. [CrossRef]
82. Park, S.J.; Seo, M.K. Element and Processing. In Interface Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp.
431–499.
83. Kuruvilla, S.P.; Renukappa, N.M.; Suresha, B. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites with
Micro and Nanofillers. In Techno-Societal; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 337–347.
84. Rajak, D.K.; Wagh, P.H.; Linul, E. Manufacturing Technologies of Carbon/Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites and Their
Properties: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3721. [CrossRef]
85. Kim, H.K.; Sohn, J.S.; Ryu, Y.; Kim, S.W.; Cha, S.W. Warpage Reduction of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Using Microcellu-lar
Foaming Process Applied Injection Molding. Polymers 2019, 11, 360. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 26 of 28

86. Ju, M.; Park, K.; Park, C. Punching Shear Behavior of Two-Way Concrete Slabs Reinforced with Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer
(GFRP) Bars. Polymers 2018, 10, 893. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
87. Jiang, X.; Luo, C.; Qiang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Kolstein, H.; Bijlaard, F. Coupled Hygro-Mechanical Finite Element Method on
De-termination of the Interlaminar Shear Modulus of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates in Bridge Decks under Hy-
grothermal Aging Effects. Polymers 2018, 10, 845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Raju, K.; Balakrishnan, M. Evaluation of mechanical properties of palm fiber/glass fiber and epoxy combined hybrid composite
laminates. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 21, 52–55. [CrossRef]
89. Dang, C.Y.; Tang, B.L.; Zeng, X.L.; Xu, J.; Feng, M.J.; Jiang, Y.; Shen, X.J. Improved interlaminar shear strength of glass fiber/epoxy
composites by graphene oxide modified short glass fiber. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 085324. [CrossRef]
90. Xian, G.; Guo, R.; Li, C.; Hong, B. Effects of rod size and fiber hybrid mode on the interface shear strength of carbon/glass fiber
composite rods exposed to freezing-thawing and outdoor environments. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 2812–2831. [CrossRef]
91. Li, G.; Xian, G.; Li, H. Tension-tension fatigue performance of a large-diameter pultruded carbon/glass hybrid rod. Int. J. Fatig.
2019, 120, 141–149. [CrossRef]
92. Vishwanath, B.; Verma, A.P.; Rao, C.V.S.K. Effect of fabric geometry on friction and wear of glass-fibre-reinforced composites.
Wear 1991, 145, 315–327. [CrossRef]
93. Wang, S.; Bai, J.; Innocent, M.T.; Wang, Q.; Xiang, H.; Tang, J.; Zhu, M. Lignin-based carbon fibers: Formation, modification and
potential applications. Green Energy Environ. 2021, 7, 578–605. [CrossRef]
94. Qu, W.; Yang, J.; Sun, X.; Bai, X.; Jin, H.; Zhang, M. Towards producing high-quality lignin-based carbon fibers: A review of
crucial factors affecting lignin properties and conversion techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 768–784. [CrossRef]
95. Banerjee, C.; Chandaliya, V.K.; Dash, P.S. Recent advancement in coal tar pitch-based carbon fiber precursor development and
fiber manufacturing process. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 158, 105272. [CrossRef]
96. Huang, J.; Ouyang, Q.; Li, M.; Heng, F.; Ma, H.; Chen, Y. Thermal behavior and thermal stabilization of guanidine hydro-chloride-
modified acrylic fiber for preparation of low-cost carbon fiber. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 136, 2195–2203. [CrossRef]
97. Chabaud, G.; Castro, M.; Denoual, C.; Le Duigou, A. Hygromechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon and glass
fibre reinforced polyamide composite for outdoor structural applications. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 26, 94–105. [CrossRef]
98. Forintos, N.; Czigány, T. Multifunctional application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: Electrical properties of the
reinforcing carbon fibers—A short review. Compos. Part B 2019, 162, 331–343. [CrossRef]
99. Esawi, A.M.K.; Farag, M.M. Carbon nanotube reinforced composites: Potential and current challenges. Mater. Des. 2007, 28,
2394–2401. [CrossRef]
100. Aamir, M.; Tolouei-Rad, M.; Giasin, K.; Nosrati, A. Recent advances in drilling of carbon fiber–reinforced polymers for aerospace
applications: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 2289–2308. [CrossRef]
101. Karakassides, A.; Ganguly, A.; Tsirka, K.; Paipetis, A.S.; Papakonstantinou, P. Radially grown graphene nanoflakes on car-bon
fibres as reinforcing interface for polymer composites. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2402–2413. [CrossRef]
102. Deborah, C. Carbon Fiber Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.
103. Zhang, Z.; Wilson, J.L.; Kitt, B.R.; Flaherty, D.W. Effects of oxygen plasma treatments on surface functional groups and shear
strength of carbon fiber composites. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 3, 986–995. [CrossRef]
104. Shariatnia, S.; Kumar, A.V.; Kaynan, O.; Asadi, A. Hybrid Cellulose Nanocrystals-Bonded Carbon Nanotubes/Carbon Fiber
Polymer Composites for Structural Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 5421–5436. [CrossRef]
105. Li, X.; Bai, M.Z.; Li, T.; Qiu, S.M.; Shi, H. Application of Carbon-Fiber Composite Material in Micropile Structure. J. Perform.
Constr. Facil. 2020, 34, 04020017. [CrossRef]
106. Luo, W.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zou, H.; Liang, M. Enhanced mechanical and tribological properties in polyphenylene
sul-fide/polytetrafluoroethylene composites reinforced by short carbon fiber. Compos. Part B 2016, 91, 579–588. [CrossRef]
107. Tenny, K.M.; Forner-Cuenca, A.; Chiang, Y.M.; Brushett, F.R. Comparing Physical and Electrochemical Properties of Different
Weave Patterns for Carbon Cloth Electrodes in Redox Flow Batteries. J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage 2020, 17, 041108-1–
041108-13. [CrossRef]
108. Mishra, S.P. A Text Book of Fibre Science and Technology; New Age International Private Ltd. Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2005;
pp. 312–316.
109. Chand, S. Review- Carbon fibers for composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 1303–1313. [CrossRef]
110. Golewski, G.L. The Beneficial Effect of the Addition of Fly Ash on Reduction of the Size of Microcracks in the ITZ of Concrete
Composites under Dynamic Loading. Energies 2021, 14, 668. [CrossRef]
111. Golewski, G.L.; Gil, D.M. Studies of Fracture Toughness in Concretes Containing Fly Ash and Silica Fume in the First 28 Days of
Curing. Materials 2021, 14, 319. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
112. Abhilash, E.; Joseph, M.A. Carbon fibre reinforced aluminum matrix composite: Development & Evaluation of Mechanical
Behaviors. In Proceedings of the Materials Science and Technology (MS&T) 2008, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5–9 October 2008.
113. Rizkalla, S.; Dawood, M. High modulus carbon fiber materials for retrofit of steel structures and bridges. In Proceedings of
the ACUN-5 International Composites Conference “Developments in Composites: Advanced, Infrastructural, Natural and
Nano-Composites”, Sydney, Australia, 11–14 July 2006.
114. Sayed, A.M. Fibrous polymeric composites. In Engineered Polymeric Fibrous Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
2021; pp. 1–58.
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 27 of 28

115. Lionetto, F.; Moscatello, A.; Totaro, G.; Raffone, M.; Maffezzoli, A. Experimental and Numerical Study of Vacuum Resin Infusion
of Stiffened Carbon Fiber Reinforced Panels. Materials 2020, 13, 4800. [CrossRef]
116. Yue, L.; Bernd, Z.; Mike, S. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for CableStructures—A Review. Polymers 2015, 7, 2078–2099.
117. Skarżyński, Ł. Mechanical and radiation shielding properties of concrete reinforced with boron-basalt fibers using Digital Image
Correlation and X-ray micro-computed tomography. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 255, 119252. [CrossRef]
118. Kumar, S.S.; Shankar, P.A.; Kumar, K.L. Failure investigation on high velocity impact deformation of Boron Carbide (B4C)
reinforced fiber metal laminates of Titanium/Glass fiber reinforced polymer. Def. Technol. 2021, 18, 963–975. [CrossRef]
119. Mehelli, O.; Derradji, M.; Belgacemi, R.; Abdous, S. Development of lightweight and highly efficient fast neutrons composites
shields based on epoxy, UHMWPE fibres and boron carbide particles. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 193, 109510. [CrossRef]
120. Buck, M.; Dorf, M. Boron Fibers in Composite Materials. Mater. Technol. 1995, 10, 13–16. [CrossRef]
121. Hasan, Z. Composite materials. In Tooling for Composite Aerospace Structures; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 21–48.
[CrossRef]
122. Zweben, C.H. Composites: Overview. In Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005;
pp. 192–208. [CrossRef]
123. Pakdel, E.; Kashi, S.; Varley, R.; Wang, X. Recent progress in recycling carbon fibre reinforced composites and dry carbon fibre
wastes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 166, 105340. [CrossRef]
124. Wawner, F.E. Boron and Silicon Carbide Fibers (CVD). In Comprehensive Composite Materials II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2018; pp. 167–186.
125. Meola, C.; Boccardi, S.; Carlomagno, G. Composite Materials in the Aeronautical Industry. In Infrared Thermography in the
Evaluation of Aerospace Composite Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2017; pp. 1–24.
126. Vasiliev, V.V.; Morozov, E.V. Advanced Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
2018.
127. Chang, P.Y.; Yeh, P.C.; Yang, J.M. Fatigue crack initiation in hybrid boron/glass/aluminum fiber metal laminates. Mater. Sci. Eng.
A 2008, 496, 273–280. [CrossRef]
128. Burningham, N.W.; Rumpel, W.F. Properties of boron fibers and composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1967, 7, 124–127. [CrossRef]
129. Maier, J.; Nöth, A. Wet-chemical coating of silicon carbide fibers with hexagonal boron nitride layers. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41,
6207–6212. [CrossRef]
130. Yamamoto, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Hayashida, M. Influence of Al particles as infiltration promoters on the interfacial reaction and
mechanical property of a continuous SiC fiber/AZ91 composite fabricated by a low-pressure infiltration method. J. Alloys Compd.
2021, 887, 161461. [CrossRef]
131. Yu, P.; Lin, Z.; Yu, J. Mechanical, thermal, and dielectric properties of SiCf/SiC composites reinforced with electrospun SiC fibers
by PIP. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 6859–6868. [CrossRef]
132. Patil, N.; Zhao, X.; Mishra, N.; Saed, M.; Radovic, M.; Green, M.J. Rapid heating of silicon carbide fibers under Radio Frequency
fields and application in curing preceramic polymer composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 46132–46139. [CrossRef]
133. Szostak, B.; Golewski, G.L. Improvement of Strength Parameters of Cement Matrix with the Addition of Siliceous Fly Ash by
Using Nanometric C-S-H Seeds. Energies 2020, 13, 6734. [CrossRef]
134. Köken, D.; Top, A.; Çakmak Cebeci, F.; Turgut, F.; Bozali, B.; Özden-Yenigün, E.; Cebeci, H. An effective growth of hierarchical
BNNTs/SiC fibers with enhanced interfacial properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 216, 109033. [CrossRef]
135. Chen, X.; Sun, Z.; Niu, X.; Bian, J.; Song, Y.; Liu, J. Evolution of the structure and mechanical performance of Cansas-II SiC fibres
after thermal treatment. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 27217–27229. [CrossRef]
136. Chen, X.; Sun, Z.; Han, X.; Niu, X.; Song, Y. Evolution of microstructure and tensile strength of Cansas-II SiC fibers under air
oxidizing atmosphere. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 7585–7600. [CrossRef]
137. An, Q.; Chen, J.; Ming, W.; Chen, M. Machining of SiC ceramic matrix composites: A review. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2020, 34, 540–567.
[CrossRef]
138. Wang, L.-Y.; Luo, R.-Y.; Cui, G.; Chen, Z. Oxidation resistance of SiCf/SiC composites with a PyC/SiC multilayer interface at
500 ◦ C to 1100 ◦ C. Corros. Sci. 2020, 167, 108522. [CrossRef]
139. Ahn, S.B.; Nguyen, M.D.; Bang, J.W.; Kim, Y.; Lee, Y.; Shin, D.G.; Kwon, W.T. SiC-conversion coating from silica sol for improved
oxidation resistance of carbon-fiber insulator in solar-cell ingot-growing crucibles. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 694, 137748. [CrossRef]
140. Golewski, G.L. new principles for implementation and operation of foundations for machines: A review of recent advances.
Struct. Eng. Mech. 2019, 71, 317–327.
141. Polozov, I.; Razumov, N.; Masaylo, D.; Silin, A.; Lebedeva, Y.; Popovich, A. Fabrication of Silicon Carbide Fiber-Reinforced Silicon
Carbide Matrix Composites Using Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing from Irregularly-Shaped and Spherical Powders.
Materials 2020, 13, 1766. [CrossRef]
142. Ji, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, B.; Li, X.; Zheng, C. Effect of machining parameters on surface integrity of silicon carbide ceramic
using end electric discharge milling and mechanical grinding hybrid machining. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2013, 27, 177–183. [CrossRef]
143. Brunner, A. Experimental aspects of Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness testing of fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites.
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 185, 161–172. [CrossRef]
144. Marsavina, L.; Constantinescu, D.M.; Linul, E.; Stuparu, F.A.; Apostol, D.A. Experimental and numerical crack paths in PUR
foams. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2016, 167, 68–83. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022, 15, 4790 28 of 28

145. Marsavina, L.; Constantinescu, D.M.; Linul, E.; Voiconi, T.; Apostol, D.A.; Sadowski, T. Evaluation of mixed mode fracture for
PUR foams. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 3, 1342–1352. [CrossRef]
146. Linul, E.; Marsavina, L.; Sadowski, T.; Kneć, M. Size effect on fracture toughness of rigid polyurethane foams. Solid State Phenom.
2012, 188, 205–210. [CrossRef]
147. Golewski, G.L. generalized fracture toughness and compressive strength of sustainable concrete including low calcium fly ash.
Materials 2017, 10, 1393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
148. Linul, E.; Serban, D.A.; Marsavina, L. Influence of cell topology on mode I fracture toughness of cellular structures. Phys.
Mesomech. 2018, 21, 178–186. [CrossRef]
149. Linul, E.; Marşavina, L.; Stoia, D.I. Mode I and II fracture toughness investigation of Laser-Sintered Polyamide. Theor. Appl. Fract.
Mech. 2020, 106, 102497. [CrossRef]
150. Arumugam, V.; Sajith, S.; Stanley, A.J. Acoustic Emission Characterization of Failure Modes in GFRP Laminates Under Mode I
Delamination. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2011, 30, 213–219. [CrossRef]
151. Manshadi, B.D.; Vassilopoulos, A.P.; Botsis, J. A combined experimental/numerical study of the scaling effects on mode I
delamination of GFRP. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 83, 32–39. [CrossRef]
152. Birsan, M.; Sadowski, T.; Marsavina, L.; Linul, E.; Pietras, D. Mechanical behavior of sandwich composite beams made of foams
and functionally graded materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2013, 50, 519–530. [CrossRef]
153. Linul, E.; Marsavina, L. Assesment of sandwich beams with rigid polyurethane foam core using failure-mode maps. Proc. Rom.
Acad.-Ser. A 2015, 16, 522–530.
154. Remmers, J.J.; Borst, R. Delamination buckling of fibre–metal laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 2207–2213. [CrossRef]
155. Parlapalli, M.R.; Soh, K.C.; Shu, D.W.; Ma, G. Experimental investigation of delamination buckling of stitched composite laminates.
Compos. Part A 2007, 38, 2024–2033. [CrossRef]
156. Panigrahi, S.K.; Pradhan, B. Through-the-width delamination damage propagation characteristics in single-lap laminated FRP
composite joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29, 114–124. [CrossRef]
157. Benzeggagh, M.L.; Kenane, M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy
composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1996, 56, 439–449. [CrossRef]
158. Berthelot, J.M. Transverse cracking and delamination in cross-ply glass-fiber and carbon-fiber reinforced plastic laminates: Static
and fatigue loading. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2003, 56, 111–147. [CrossRef]
159. Kim, J.K.; Baillie, C.; Mai, Y.W. Interfacial debonding and fibre pull-out stresses. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 3143–3154. [CrossRef]
160. Stang, H.; Shah, S.P. Failure of fibre-reinforced composites by pull-out fracture. J. Mater. Sci. 1986, 21, 953–957. [CrossRef]
161. Cantwell, W.J.; Morton, J. The impact resistance of composite materials—A review. Composites 1991, 22, 347–362. [CrossRef]
162. Nairn, J.A.; Hu, S.; Bark, J.S. A critical evaluation of theories for predicting microcracking in composite laminates. J. Mater. Sci.
1993, 28, 5099–5111. [CrossRef]
163. Krishnan, P. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India. In
Mechanical and Physical Testing of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2018; p. 343.