CPA Official IAS 40 Ans
CPA Official IAS 40 Ans
CPA Official IAS 40 Ans
SOLUTION 5
[Total: 20 Marks]
Suggested solution
Under the revaluation model of IAS 16 revaluation gains and losses are treated differently depending on
(a)
An originating gain on revaluation of PPE (meaning one which is occurring for the first time, and not reversing
a previously recognised loss) is recognised through “Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)” in the SPLOCI. This
is then taken to a separate component of equity, usually called “Revaluation Surplus” reserve.
A revaluation gain that is reversing a previously recognised loss is taken to profit or loss as a gain until the
effect of the previously recognised loss is completely reversed. This takes into account any difference in
depreciation charges arising as a result of the previous loss lowering the depreciable amount. Any gain over
and above the amount recognised in profit or loss is treated as an originating gain, and taken to OCI.
A revaluation loss that is reversing a previously recognised gain is taken to OCI until the effect of the
revaluation gain is reversed. This means in effect that OCI is charged with the expense until the accumulated
revaluation surplus remaining in equity has been eliminated. Any further loss is treated as an originating loss
and taken to profit or loss.
It should be noted that gains and losses on different assets may not be offset against each other. Any reversal
must be relating to revaluations of the same asset.
Under the fair value model of IAS 40, all gains or losses on investment property are taken to profit or loss and
on to Retained Earnings reserve. There is no revaluation surplus reserve where investment property is
(ii)
concerned. Likewise, there is no difference between originating and reversing gains and losses under IAS 40.
Under IFRS 9 financial assets may be held under the “fair value” or the “amortised cost” categories. The
categorization is not optional, but depends on the type of instrument and the entity’s business model for
(iii)
holding it. The “fair value” method is the default and applies to all financial instruments to which the “amortised
cost” method does not apply.
Page 22
Under IFRS 9, gains and losses on remeasurement of such assets are normally taken to profit or loss,
affecting the retained earnings reserve ultimately. However there is a limited exception to this. If the financial
asset in question is an equity investment, and an election has been made at the date of purchase, any gains
or losses on remeasurement are taken to OCI, and on to a separate component of equity. This election is
irrevocable once made, but may be applied or not as decided on the date of purchase.
This property was an IAS 16 property until 1 April 2014 and an IAS 40 investment property after this date. The
(b)
accounting treatment therefore changes on the date it became an investment property. Any revaluation gains
(i)
or losses up to that date are accounted for under IAS 16, and any arising since are accounted for under IAS
40.
The revaluation gain would be taken to OCI and the revaluation loss to profit or loss as they were recognised
in the financial year ended 31 March 2015. The depreciation relates to previous years, so its recording is not
the subject of the requirement.
Under IAS 40, investment property is not depreciated and is revalued to fair value at each reporting date. Any
gains or losses are taken to profit or loss.
Investment property
€million
Fair value 1 April 2014 4.1
Fair value 31 March 2015 4.8
Fair value gain 0.7
Page 23
(ii) Dividends received are recognised as income regardless of the treatment of the financial assets.
Remeasurements are treated in accordance with the policy of the entity. We must assume that the irrevocable
election required by IFRS 9 was made as this is the policy of Williamson Ltd.
Dr Cash 1.1
Cr Financial assets 1.1
The assets held at the period end must be remeasured to €14 million. These are already carried at €12.7
million (12.0 – 0.9 + 1.6). The original carrying value included €0.9 relating to the investments sold, so these
are no longer there. In addition, new assets costing €1.6 million were purchased.
The fair value of these remaining assets on 31 March 2015 was 14 million, hence a gain of €1.3 million (14
– 12.7) must be recognised.
Page 24