PIMM CPB Arif 2014
PIMM CPB Arif 2014
PIMM CPB Arif 2014
is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech
researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.
Muhamad Fatikul ARIF, Nicolas SAINTIER, Fodil MERAGHNI, Joseph FITOUSSI, Yves
CHEMISKY, Gilles ROBERT - Multiscale fatigue damage characterization in short glass fiber
reinforced polyamide-66 - Composites Part B: Engineering - Vol. 61, p.55-65 - 2014
a b s t r a c t
This paper aims at studying fatigue damage behavior of injection molded 30 wt% short glass fiber rein-
forced polyamide-66 composite (PA66/GF30). The evolution of dynamic modulus, hysteresis area, cyclic
creep and temperature during fatigue tests were analyzed and discussed. Damage analyses by X-ray
micro-computed tomography (lCT) technique on interrupted fatigue tests at several percentages of total
fatigue life were performed to further understand the damage mechanisms and evolution during fatigue
loading. It can be observed that experimental results related to the evolution of dynamic modulus, strain,
Keywords:
temperature and energy dissipation are important and consistently complement each other for damage
A: Polymer–matrix composites (PMCs)
B: Fatigue
evaluation of PA66/GF30. During fatigue loading, diffuse damage occurs over the entire specimen though
B: Microstructures the damage does not necessarily exhibit the same level between different locations inside the specimen.
E: Injection molding The lCT analysis of voids characteristics demonstrates that the damage continuously increases during
Micro-computed tomography fatigue loading. The damage is developed notably along fiber interface in the form of fiber/matrix inter-
facial debonding.
3. Specimen
Fig. 1. Locations of lCT sample extraction for injection molding induced micro- Specimens used for mechanical tests were machined from the
structure investigation (A and B). rectangular plate produced by injection molding. To consider the
Fig. 2. Skin–shell–transition–core microstructure formation of PA66/GF30 observed by lCT technique.
(a)
transition
transition
Normalized first tensor component (a11)
core
shell shell
skin
skin
0.6 Δε
Transverse
0.4
0.2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 t (s)
Strain (%)
Fig. 6. Schematic of sinusoidal wave form of strain response of material under
Fig. 5. Tensile properties of longitudinal and transverse specimens of PA66/GF30. fatigue loading.
endurance limit has been reached at those stress levels and that no
damage occurs below the corresponding stress levels. According to
the published works on fatigue behavior of short glass fiber rein-
forced polyamides, one cannot reach a distinctive endurance limit
−1
stress up to 106 cycles [1,20,31], or even up to 107 cycles [32,33].
Max strain rate (s−1)
10
−2
(a) σ
max
= 50% σ
u verse specimens. During cyclic loading, energy dissipation can be
10 1 2 3 4 5 6
associated to different phenomena such as damage development
10 10 10 10 10 10
and intrinsic dissipation (viscous behavior). Part of the mechanical
Number of cycles
strain energy due to the damage development and viscous effect of
the material is turned into heat so that thermo-elasto-visco-dam-
age coupling can occur during fatigue loading.
The dynamic modulus reduction can be used as a damage indi-
cator when considering a classical continuum damage mechanics
framework [6,34]. For all loading cases encountered in this study,
Max strain rate (s )
−1
−1
10
the normalized dynamic modulus evolution demonstrates a stable
value for the first 103 cycles and then decreases at a rate that de-
run−outs pends on the loading level. In all cases, the intensity of the decrease
of the normalized dynamic modulus is directly related to the fati-
σmax= 70% σu gue life of the specimen.
σmax= 60% σu The evolution of mean temperature exhibits two regimes
σmax= 50% σu (Fig. 9). The first one corresponds to a stable normalized modulus,
where heat dissipation seems to be mostly related to the intrinsic
−2
(b) σmax= 40% σu
energy dissipation associated to the viscous nature of the compos-
10
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6 ite. The second regime is associated to the onset of the decrease of
Number of cycles the normalized dynamic modulus and it corresponds to an inflec-
tion point on the mean temperature evolution. This regime change
Fig. 7. Evolution of maximum strain rate of (a) longitudinal and (b) transverse
can be associated to the fact that the strain energy is not only dis-
specimens during fatigue loading of PA66/GF30. (ru represents the ultimate tensile
strength of its respective orientation angles). sipated into heat due to the viscous nature of the composite but
also dissipated into a damage development and accumulation.
As shown in Fig. 9, the maximum strain continuously increases
1 during fatigue life. The minimum strain exhibits the same trend
0.9
0.8 (Fig. 10) so that the strain amplitude is almost constant during fa-
0.7 tigue loading. It can then be stated that the observed damage is
0.6 associated to a combined effect of creep and cyclic loading. How-
Normalized maximum stress
0
0.85
E /E
0.94 σmax= 65% σu
σ = 70% σ
N
0.8
σ = 60% σ max u
max u
0.75 σ = 60% σ
σmax= 55% σu max u
0.7 σ = 50% σ
4 σmax= 50% σu max u
0.65 σmax= 40% σu
3.5
3 4
(%)
2.5
(%)
max
3
2
ε
max
1.5 2
ε
1
1
30
10
25
(°C)
(°C)
7.5 20
room
room
15
5
−T
−T
10
mean
2.5
mean
5
T
T
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Number of cycles (N) Number of cycles (N)
Fig. 9. Evolution of normalized dynamic modulus (EN =E0 ), maximum strain ðemax Þ and mean temperature ðT mean T room Þ of (a) longitudinal and (b) transverse specimens
during fatigue loading of PA66/GF30. (ru represents the ultimate tensile strength of its respective orientation angles).
1.8 10
σ = 50% σ
max u σmax=60% σu
1.6 σmax=65% σu
ΔT (°C)
8
1.4
6
1.2 σ =55% σ
max u
4
1
2
0.8 σ =50% σ
max u
0
0.6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 10 10 10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10 10 Number of cycles
Number of cycles
(b) 40 T
max
−T
room
(b) 2.2 σ
max
= 70% σ
u
35 T
mean
−T
room
2 σ = 60% σ 30
max u σmax=70% σu run−outs
σ = 50% σ
Normalized energy dissipation
1.8 max u 25
σ = 40% σ
ΔT (°C)
max u 20
1.6
run−outs 15
1.4
10 σmax=60% σu
1.2
σ =50% σ
5 max u
1
0
σmax=40% σu
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6
0.6 10 10 10 10 10 10
Number of cycles
1 2 3 4 5 6
10 10 10 10 10 10
Number of cycles Fig. 12. Evolution of mean and maximum temperature of (a) longitudinal and (b)
transverse specimens during fatigue loading of PA66/GF30.
Fig. 11. Evolution of normalized energy dissipation of (a) longitudinal and (b)
transverse specimens during fatigue loading of PA66/GF30. The energy dissipation
was obtained by evaluating the hysteresis area at each loading cycle normalized by
the initial value.
Fig. 16. A rendered lCT image of a zone with highly debonded fibers in the shell
layer of longitudinal specimen that has been fatigue loaded up to failure at
maximum stress of 60% ru . The blue and green colors represent the fiber and
damaged zone, respectively. (For interpretation of the references to color in this
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 17. A rendered lCT image which shows heterogeneous damage level at
microscopic scale (the highlighted zone shows higher damage). The image was
taken from longitudinal specimen that has been fatigue loaded up to 75% of fatigue
observed at the fatigue loaded specimens and can be considered as
life at maximum stress of 60% ru . The blue and magenta colors represent the fiber
the main fatigue damage mechanism for PA66/GF30. In terms of and damaged zone, respectively. (For interpretation of the references to color in this
spatial distribution of damage, though the damage is diffused over figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
of the composite. The random skin layers in the longitudinal and
transverse specimens exhibit the same behavior as those in the
shell layers. Even though the thin random skin layers are devel-
oped, the degree of random orientation is not high and the fibers
in this layer tend to orient according to MFD, which is the same ori-
entation as the ones in the shell layer (Fig. 3). For the transverse
specimen, less fiber/matrix interfacial debonding is observed. Thi is
probably due to the high development of matrix microcracks in
addition to the fiber/matrix interfacial debonding as observed in
the 2D images (Figs. 14 and 15). These figures illustrate clearly
the anisotropic nature of the damage developed at the local scale.
In addition to the final stage damage investigation, similar lCT
analyses were performed on longitudinal specimens that have
Fig. 18. Description of the analyzed lCT volumes in the shell and core regions of
the composite.
been fatigue loaded up to several percentages of fatigue life.
Fig. 22 illustrates the evolution of void volume as a function of void
orientation and number of cycles at the shell layer of longitudinal
90 30 specimens that have been fatigue loaded up to several percentages
120 60 of fatigue life. It clearly shows that the void volumes increase
20 throughout the fatigue life. It is worth noting that voids with low
150 30 volumes are also observed in the virgin sample, which could be
10 due to the real initial damage or fluctuation of the gray level. The
majority of voids with high volume in the shell layers are oriented
180 0 at 0°, longitudinal to the fiber orientation as well as to the applied
load direction. This signifies that the voids, notably with high vol-
umes, are located along fiber interface in the form of fiber/matrix
210 330 interfacial debonding. These results are consistent with the aspect
ratio analyses performed previously. In terms of evolution, the
240 300 damage increase shows little evolution in the first 0–50%. However
270 it evolves more significantly in the second half of the total fatigue
life. It is important to notice that this evolution corresponds to the
Fig. 19. Void aspect ratio vs. void orientation angle in the shell zone of virgin
specimen.
dynamic modulus evolution given in Fig. 9. If one considers the
change in the total void volume DV with respect to the initial void
volume, one can obtain that DV 50%Nf < 0:5%; DV 75%Nf ¼ 1:3% and
any deviations of the subsequent void aspect ratio and volume DV 100%Nf ¼ 2:5%. This evolution agrees very well with the dynamic
analyses for the fatigue loaded specimens are not due to the thres- modulus evolution in the final stage. However the lCT analyses
holding technique but mostly related to the damage development. were not able to capture the damage evolution at the early stage
Figs. 20 and 21 illustrate the void aspect ratio vs. angular posi- of fatigue life. This is most probably due to the fact that opening
tion of longitudinal and transverse specimens, respectively, that of the interface above the resolution limit is needed to make it pos-
have been fatigue loaded up to failure at maximum stress level sible to be detected by the lCT analyses.
of 60% ru . Significant damage is observed when comparing these In terms of spatial distribution of the damage, based on the
results to the one of the virgin material (Fig. 19). In longitudinal macroscopic characterization technique discussed in Section
specimen, the voids in the shell and core layers are mainly oriented 5.2.2, the damage is preferentially diffused over the entire speci-
at 0° and 90°, respectively (Fig. 20). It is worth noticing that these men. However, based on the microscopic observation by lCT tech-
orientations are the same as the principal fiber orientations in the nique, though the diffuse damage is observed, the damage level
shell and core layers. It means the voids are mainly located along between different locations inside the specimen is not necessarily
fiber interface in the form of fiber/matrix interfacial debonding. the same. Quantification of the local fiber density and its effects on
For the transverse specimen, the voids in the shell and core layers the fiber/matrix interfacial debonding process is underway and
are both oriented at 90°, as shown in Fig. 21. It shows that fiber/ will be the subject of a forthcoming paper.
matrix interfacial debondings occur in the shell layer, while matrix Finally, it can be summarized that the observed voids can be
microcracks with preferential direction transversely to the applied associated in a large extent to the fiber/matrix interfacial debond-
load as well as to the fibers direction are dominant in the core layer ing, complete or partial depending on the local configuration of the
Fig. 20. Void aspect ratio vs. void orientation angle in (a) shell and (b) core regions of fatigue loaded longitudinal specimen. Laminate representation analogy of longitudinal
specimen is presented in (c) for an interpretation guideline of void orientation angle.
(a) (b) (c)
Fig. 21. Void aspect ratio vs. void orientation angle in (a) shell and (b) core regions of fatigue loaded transverse specimen. Laminate representation analogy of transverse
specimen is presented in (c) for an interpretation guideline of void orientation angle.
8000 8000
0% N 50% N
f f
Void volume (µm )
3
6000 6000
4000 4000
2000 2000
0 0
−90 −45 0 45 90 −90 −45 0 45 90
Void orientation angle Void orientation angle
8000 8000
75% Nf 100% Nf
Void volume (µm )
6000 6000
4000 4000
2000 2000
0 0
−90 −45 0 45 90 −90 −45 0 45 90
Void orientation angle Void orientation angle
Fig. 22. Void orientation angle vs. void volume graphs of the upper shell layer of longitudinal specimens that have been fatigue loaded up to several percentages of fatigue life
(N f ) at maximum stress level of 60% ru .
fibers. However, it is difficult to quantify the degree of interfacial microcrack with preferential direction transversely to the applied
debonding as the fiber length is not unique. Indeed, fiber length load is dominant due to the locally high stress concentration.
variability is developed due to the injection process. Matrix micro- The lCT results also demonstrate that the damage continuously
cracks at high stress level have been observed but do not seems to increases during fatigue loading. However, the damage evolution
be dominant in the damage process for dry as molded PA66/GF30. occurs more significantly in the second half of the fatigue life. De-
spite high resolutions used in this work, detection of fiber/matrix
interfacial debonding in the early stages of fatigue life was difficult.
6. Concluding remarks Observation with higher resolution is then required to further
investigate these early stages.
The macroscopic and microscopic fatigue damage behavior of The observed damage mechanisms and evolution are currently
PA66/GF30 have been studied. The experimental results related integrated into a micromechanical modeling in order to propose a
to the evolution of dynamic modulus, strain, temperature and en- physically based, microstructure dependent fatigue model. Further
ergy dissipation are important to evaluate the damage evolution. work on spatial damage distribution by lCT analysis is underway
The dynamic modulus can be used as a damage indicator, though and will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
in high stress level it may overpredict the damage evolution due
to the high viscous effect contribution of the composite.
Based on thermography analysis on PA66/GF30 surface, diffuse
damage occurs over the entire specimen. However, the micro- References
scopic observation by lCT technique states that the diffuse dam-
[1] Horst JJ, Spoormaker JL. Mechanisms of fatigue in short glass fiber reinforced
age does not necessarily exhibit the same level between different polyamide 6. Polym Eng Sci 1996;36(22):2718–26.
locations inside the specimen. [2] Horst JJ, Spoormaker JL. Fatigue fracture mechanisms and fractography of
The lCT analysis shows that the damage is mainly developed short-glassfibre-reinforced polyamide 6. J Mater Sci 1997;32(14):3641–51.
[3] Ben Cheikh Larbi A, Sai K, Sidhom H, Baptiste D. Constitutive model of
along fiber interface in the form of fiber/matrix interfacial debond- micromechanical damage to predict reduction in stiffness of a fatigued SMC
ing, except at the core layer of transverse specimen where matrix composite. J Mater Eng Perform 2006;15(5):575–80.
[4] Toubal L, Karama M, Lorrain B. Damage evolution and infrared thermography [19] Arif MF, Meraghni F, Chemisky Y, Despringre N, Robert G. In situ damage
in woven composite laminates under fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue mechanisms investigation of PA66/GF30 composite: effect of relative
2006;28(12):1867–72. humidity. Compos Part B: Eng 2013(0).
[5] Mourglia-Seignobos E. Compréhension des mécanismes physiques de fatigue [20] Mallick PK, Zhou Y. Effect of mean stress on the stress-controlled fatigue of a
dans le polyamide vierge et renforcé de fibres de verre. Ph.D. thesis; INSA Lyon; short E-glass fiber reinforced polyamide-6,6. Int J Fatigue 2004;26(9):941–6.
2009. [21] Bernasconi A, Kulin RM. Effect of frequency upon fatigue strength of a short
[6] Nouri H, Meraghni F, Lory P. Fatigue damage model for injection-molded short glass fiber reinforced polyamide 6: a superposition method based on cyclic
glass fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Int J Fatigue 2009;31(5):934–42. creep parameters. Polym Compos 2009;30(2):154–61.
[7] Meraghni F, Nouri H, Bourgeois N, Czarnota C, Lory P. Parameters identification [22] Bernasconi A, Davoli P, Basile A, Filippi A. Effect of fibre orientation on the
of fatigue damage model for short glass fiber reinforced polyamide (PA6-GF30) fatigue behaviour of a short glass fibre reinforced polyamide-6. Int J Fatigue
using digital image correlation. Proc Eng 2011;10:2110–6. 2007;29(2):199–208.
[8] Nouri H, Czarnota C, Meraghni F. Experimental parameters identification of [23] Nouri H. Modélisation et identification de lois de comportement avec
fatigue damage model for short glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics GFRP. In: endommagement en fatigue polycyclique de matériaux composite a matrice
Haddar M, Romdhane L, Louati J, Ben Amara A, editors. Design and modeling of thermoplastique. Ph.D. thesis; Arts et Métiers ParisTech; 2009.
mechanical systems. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Berlin, [24] De Monte M, Moosbrugger E, Quaresimin M. Influence of temperature and
Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 523–30. thickness on the off-axis behaviour of short glass fibre reinforced polyamide
[9] Steinberger R, Valadas Leitao TI, Ladstatter E, Pinter G, Billinger W, Lang RW. 6.6 Quasi-static loading. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2010;41(7):859–71.
Infrared thermographic techniques for non-destructive damage [25] Klimkeit B, Castagnet S, Nadot Y, El Habib A, Benoit G, Bergamo S, et al. Fatigue
characterization of carbon fibre reinforced polymers during tensile fatigue damage mechanisms in short fiber reinforced PBT+PET GF30. Mater Sci Eng: A
testing. Int J Fatigue 2006;28(10):1340–7. 2011;528(3):1577–88.
[10] Ghorbel A, Saintier N, Dhiab A. Investigation of damage evolution in short glass [26] ID19 ESRF. <http://www.esrf.eu/UsersAndScience/Experiments/Imaging/
fibers reinforced polyamide 6,6 under tensile loading using infrared ID19>.
thermography. Proc Eng 2011;10:2123–8. [27] Advani SG, Tucker CL. The use of tensors to describe and predict fiber
[11] Esmaeillou B, Fitoussi J, Lucas A, Tcharkhtchi A. Multi-scale experimental orientation in short fiber composites. J Rheol 1987;31.
analysis of the tension–tension fatigue behavior of a short glass fiber [28] Mlekusch B. Fibre orientation in short-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics II.
reinforced polyamide composite. Proc Eng 2011;10:2117–22. Quantitative measurements by image analysis. Compos Sci Technol
[12] Esmaeillou B, Ferreira P, Bellenger V, Tcharkhtchi A. Fatigue behavior of 1999;59:547–60.
polyamide 66/glass fiber under various kinds of applied load. Polym Compos [29] Eberhardt CN, Clarke A. Fibre-orientation measurements in short-glass-fibre
2012;33(4):540–7. composites. Part I: Automated, high-angular-resolution measurement by
[13] Esmaeillou B, Fereirra P, Bellenger V, Tcharkhtchi A. Fatigue damage initiation confocal microscopy. Compos Sci Technol 2001;61(10):1389–400.
of a PA66/glass fibers composite material. J Appl Polym Sci [30] Lee Y, Lee S, Youn J, Chung K, Kang T. Characterization of fiber orientation in
2012;125(5):4007–14. short fiber reinforced composites with an image processing technique. Mater
[14] Montesano J, Fawaz Z, Bougherara H. Use of infrared thermography to Res Innovat 2002;6(2):65–72.
investigate the fatigue behavior of a carbon fiber reinforced polymer [31] Zhou Y, Mallick P. Fatigue performance of an injection-molded short E-glass
composite. Compos Struct 2013;97:76–83. fiber-reinforced polyamide 6,6. I. Effects of orientation, holes, and weld line.
[15] Bayraktar E, Antolonovich S, Bathias C. Multiscale study of fatigue behaviour of Polym Compos 2006;27(2):230–7.
composite materials by v-rays computed tomography. Int J Fatigue [32] De Monte M, Moosbrugger E, Quaresimin M. Influence of temperature and
2006;28(10):1322–33. thickness on the off-axis behaviour of short glass fibre reinforced polyamide
[16] Lambert J, Chambers A, Sinclair I, Spearing S. 3D damage characterisation and 6.6 cyclic loading. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2010;41(10):1368–79.
the role of voids in the fatigue of wind turbine blade materials. Compos Sci [33] Sonsino C, Moosbrugger E. Fatigue design of highly loaded short-glass-fibre
Technol 2012;72(2):337–43. reinforced polyamide parts in engine compartments. Int J Fatigue
[17] Withers PJ, Preuss M. Fatigue and damage in structural materials studied by X- 2008;30(7):1279–88.
ray tomography. Annu Rev Mater Res 2012;42(1):81–103. [34] Ladeveze P, Le Dantec E. Damage modelling of the elementary ply for
[18] Cosmi F, Bernasconi A. Micro-CT investigation on fatigue damage evolution in laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 1992;43(3):257–67.
short fibre reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol 2013;79:70–6.