CM Unit - II
CM Unit - II
MS/15ID/404C
Managing Compensation:
The following factors should be taken into consideration in determining wage and salary
structure of workers:
If they fail in their attempt to raise the wage and other allowances through collective bargaining,
they resort to strike and other methods where by the supply of labour is restricted. This exerts a
kind of influence on the employees to concerned test partially the demands of the labour unions.
There are measurement problems both in ascertaining productivity and cost of living increases.
This problem may lead to lack of understanding and unanimity on the part of the management
and the workers.
It is not practicable to draw demand and supply curves for each job in an organisation even
though, theoretically, a separate curve exists for each job. But, in general, if anything works to
decrease the supply of labour such as restriction by a particular labour union, there will be a
tendency to increase the wage. The reverse of each situation is likely to result in a decrease in
employee wage, provided other factors, such is those discussed below, do not intervene.
(vii) Productivity:
Increasingly there is a trend towards gearing wage increases to productivity increases.
Productivity is the key factor in the operations of a company. High wages and low costs are
possible only when productivity increases appreciably. The above factors exercise a kind of
general influence on wage rates. In addition, there are several factors which do affect the
individual difference in wage rates.
The most important factors which affect the individual differences in wage rates are:
Job evaluation takes place early in the process of creating a compensation system for the
organization. The job evaluation process may contrast with or be used in conjunction with
market pricing, which uses the labor market to set jobs' worth. This process, which may take
several months, is usually completed by a team of knowledgeable senior employees who
understand the functions of most of the organization's jobs. To maintain objectivity, employers
sometimes hire consultants to complete this step in the compensation planning and design
process.
Job evaluations are often confused with job analysis, but the two activities differ drastically. A
job analysis is the systematic process of examining specific tasks and responsibilities related to a
job, typically for writing a job description. .
Job Evaluation Methods
Four primary methods of job evaluations used to set compensation levels are point factor, factor
comparison, job ranking and job classification. Historically, job evaluations were internal
comparisons of job worth; however, in recent years employers have begun to use a combination
of internal comparisons and external market benchmarking.
Internal Job Evaluation Methods
Internal job evaluation methods are either quantitative or qualitative.
Quantitative approaches
Quantitative methods use facts based on collected data to define a job.
Point factor. The point factor method is a commonly used quantitative technique. This approach
breaks down jobs into compensable factors identified during a job analysis. Points are assigned
to the factors, and a pay structure is established for the position.
Using a system for internal equity, such as the point factor system, forces an organization to
quantify total points for each unique job, determining its true value to the company. This process
often provides value beyond compensation, including benefits for recruitment, promotions and
job design. However, designing a custom point-factor system may take additional time and
resources and require assistance from senior management.
Factor comparison. The factor comparison method represents a combination of the ranking
(explained later) and point methods. The first step is to identify benchmark jobs (i.e., jobs
performed by several individuals with similar duties within the organization, such as
administrative assistance, stock clerk, security guard, accountant, sales representative, supervisor
and manager). In addition, the organization must select compensable factors and rank all
benchmark jobs after completing factor analysis. Next, the employer must compare jobs to
market rates for benchmarking, which results in the assignment of monetary values for each
compensable factor. Finally, the organization should compare all of its jobs with respective
benchmark jobs.
Custom Factor Comparison
The custom factor comparison method is specific to the organization, but it is time-consuming to
establish and maintain. In addition, the organization must monitor market rates to maintain the
system's integrity.
Qualitative approaches
Qualitative approaches use observations or descriptions to define jobs.
Job ranking. Job ranking places jobs in a hierarchy of their value to the company. It is the
simplest method but is not appropriate for every organization. This method is best suited to
smaller organizations that can reduce the number of positions to be reviewed to no more than
100 specific jobs. Larger organizations should select another system.
Job ranking generates an estimate of the correct job hierarchy, not the exact hierarchy found in
the point-factor system. Job ranking should be facilitated by a skilled compensation specialist
who can address favoritism by managers and evaluate other subjective input.
Job classification. In the job classification method, the evaluator writes descriptions of each
class of jobs and then puts them into the grade that best matches the class description. Because
this process is subjective, with a wide variety of jobs and general job descriptions, positions
could fall within more than one grade level. This method also relies on job titles and duties,
assuming they are similar among organizations. These classifications are based on the job's skill
and complexity. Organizations usually create grades along occupational lines.
External Job Evaluation Methods
For some organizations, internal job evaluations may be inappropriate. For example, jobs with a
skills shortage may result in inflated prices. In addition, matrix organizations with little hierarchy
would not benefit from job ranking or point-factor comparisons. Therefore, many employers are
beginning to use market data to determine a job's worth. To stay competitive, organizations
frequently review external pay rates and monitor current, accurate market data.
Market Pricing.
Market-pricing the external value of individual jobs enables employers to create effective
competitive pay plans and allocate compensation costs wisely. The most common source for
such market data is third-party compensation surveys.
Market pricing emphasizes external competitiveness; however, employers may have insufficient
or unreliable market data for all the organization's jobs. Additionally, an internal job evaluation
even a simple approach, such as ranking—is required to maintain internal equity. Key benefits of
job content evaluation include internal consistency and the ability to evaluate all jobs based on
content. Organizations can use job evaluations to:
● Ensure compliance with federal laws and regulations on equal pay and state/provincial or
local ordinances on comparable worth. .
● Establish a rational, consistent job structure based on value to the organization in terms of
each job's complexity and importance (with or without reference to market valuation).
Many job evaluation methods are subjective. Evaluators' decisions about which jobs are worth
more can be personal and emotional. If the team members know the job incumbents, they may
consider employees' personal qualities as job factors. Outside consultants can help the team have
productive and objective discussions about job factors and their relative weights.
Base pay, which establishes the standard of living, is the foundation for total compensation. It
also indicates the value the organization places on an employee's role and contributions.
According to a SHRM Foundation study, Implementing Total Rewards Strategies, compensation
is a highly emotional topic that may initiate resistance to change and increase emotional turmoil.
The organization and employees must view base pay rates as:
● Internally equitable.
● Externally competitive.
● Affordable and cost-effective.
● Legal and defensible.
● Understandable.
● Appropriate for the organization.
● Appropriate for the workforce.
1. Specify the project's parameters, and gain approvals and support from senior
management.
2. Select an appropriate evaluation method or system.
3. Collect job data consistent with the method or system. This step includes specifying
trustworthy data collection techniques.
4. Analyze data, document job content and evaluate jobs.
5. Use points to develop job worth hierarchy, and group jobs into grades based on
appropriate breaks, or take another fair, understandable, defensible and practical
approach.
6. Allocate jobs to the existing pay structure, or develop a new one.
7. Document system development, and establish operating procedures, including policies
for reconsidering decisions or a formal appeals procedure.
8. Gain final approvals.
9. Implement and administer system.
Typical system-specific steps for a non-quantitative approach to job evaluation (e.g., whole-job
ranking methodology) are:
1. Identify and briefly describe the benchmarks (key jobs based on employee count,
importance to the organization and other considerations).
2. Rank the benchmarks into a hierarchy through paired comparisons (e.g., identifying
which job in each comparison is "better" than the other overall).
3. Slot the remaining jobs by comparing each with the ranked benchmarks.
Slotting new jobs then becomes the operational method for evaluating them. Organizations may
also use slotting to supplement, or replace, an established quantitative approach by comparing
critical job elements with those of jobs whose worth is already ranked.
No matter how the organization establishes its job worth hierarchy, job evaluators continue to use
job content to value new and changed jobs. Some organizations use market pricing to check job
evaluation. Pay rates in organizations using the job content evaluation approach are set by
reference to the market, collective bargaining or other means.
Pay ranges and pay increase budgets are the most common control devices used for base pay
administration. When discussing merit pay, employers must evaluate where pay rates fall within
the ranges to determine whether the organization's pay policy is consistent. Pay rates that fall
below or above the pay range minimums or maximums, respectively, can be a problem. "Red
circle rates" are salaries above the maximum rate established for the position. "Green circle
rates" are salaries below the minimum rate. Green circle rates are as problematic as red circle
rates because they violate the organization's philosophy. Organizations should move employees
with green circle rates up to at least the minimum in the range or give them an opportunity to
move to a job in the next grade above them.
A wage and salary survey is used to compile market pay data for a plethora of jobs on either a local or
nationwide basis. This survey is usually performed in order to assess the effectiveness of a company’s
current pay structure and practices. Surveys are used to plan future methods of compensation, and they
can be instrumental in exposing gaps and waste stemming from current policies and procedures. A
comprehensive survey may also provide companies with wage data from other companies – this will
allow them to assess their own compensatory policies and adjust them accordingly. Survey data is
compiled using various data and records from human resource departments. Information will usually be
displayed on a wage curve.
Example. If a person can put in a maximum of 8 hours of work daily @ Rs.80/hr. If the same
person is paid @ Rs. 100/hr, which is higher in terms of returns that the person gets after putting
in the same amount off work. Therefore, more number of people will be required for getting the
work done.
Implications: Wage Curve
1. It gives us an idea of how the rate of unemployment varies in different countries and also the
reasons for the same.
2. It also explains why labors are willing to move from an area with low wage rate and high
unemployment to an area with high wage rate and low unemployment.
Pay grades are defined as a method of categorizing different types of jobs into groups that have the same
relative pay rate and internal worth. They are used to determine a standard framework of monetary
compensation for both private and public sector organizations. Pay grades typically encompass two
separate levels of evaluation. The vertical range is associated with the responsibilities needed for a
specific position, while the horizontal range corresponds to tenure and performance in the workplace. In
this way, employee progress can be assessed on a regular basis rather than relying on an open form of
negotiation for fair salary ranges.
Grade Pay : Government employees receive grade pay which depends on the
category/class of employee. Actually grade pay depends on the seniority and the
position of the employee in the government.
Basic Pay :- This is the core of salary, and many other components may be calculated
based on this amount. It usually depends on one’s grade within the company’s salary is a
fixed part of one’s compensation structure. Many allowances and deductions are
described in terms of percentage of the Basic Salary.
Pay Scale :- It is the range of the salary you are entitled to receive during your tenure in
company. For eg :- If payscale is Rs( 5240-20000). Number 1 , 5240 : It is the basic pay
at which your salary is calculated when you are appointed. Number 2 , 20000,: It is the
maximum basic pay a person can receive in a designated post.
Allowance: It is the amount received by an individual paid by his/her employer in
addition to salary to meet some service requirements such as Dearness Allowance(DA),
House Rent Allowance (HRA), Leave Travel Assistance(LTA) , Lunch Allowance,
Conveyance Allowance , Children’s Education Allowance, City compensatory
Allowance etc. Allowance can be fully taxable, partly or non taxable.
House Rent Allowance: House rental allowance (HRA) is allowance paid for house
rent. It depends city to city. Cities are classified as X, Y and Z, on the basis of their
population, as recommended by Sixth Central Pay Commission in 2008. HRA is also
used by the Indian Revenue Service (IRS) to provide income tax exemptions.
The Wage Code regulates wage and bonus payments in all employment. The Code combines
the provision of the following four laws: (i) the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, (ii) the Minimum
Wages Act, 1948, (iii) the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and (iv) the Equal Remuneration Act,
1976. The Wage Code repeals the above 4 laws.
NON-STANDARD WORKERS' RIGHTS ON WORKING HOURS AND OVERTIME -
PLATFORM WORKERS
Working hours are regulated for employees. Since, independent contractors, i.e., platform workers are
not considered employees, the working hours' restriction are not applicable to them.
Uber requires its drivers to take an uninterrupted 6-hour break after every 12 hours of time spent
driving. Driving time is from the time a driver confirms the trip request and start driving to the pickup, to
when you complete the trip. If a driver is online and stationary, for example waiting for a request, driving
around the city without a passenger, or sitting in an airport queue, this time is not included into the 12
hours of driving time.
In the event of bad weather as well as rush hours, demand for rides increases. In such cases, fares
increase. This is referred to as surge pricing. Fares are updated based on the demand in real-time. Uber
drivers or partners are shown this high demand through a changed colour map indicating demand
originating from those areas. Surge rates are charged as a multiplier of X. The surge multiplier generally
lies between 1 to 2. In the case of surge pricing with a multiplier of 1.5, the normal fare was 100 rupees
rises to 150 rupees. The actual payout to the worker increases in this case.
In accordance with the Factories Act, the night shift is a shift which extends beyond midnight. There is no
special pay premium for employees working overnight.
The Code on Wages Bill, 2019 was passed by the Lok Sabha on July 30, 2019 and Rajya Sabha on 02
August 2019.
Fixing pay
5. Job Requirements - More difficult the job, Higher the Wages & Compensation. Measure of Job
difficulty, used with relative value of job to another Organization (Comparison).Job Grading Relative
Skills Efforts, Responsibility Job Conditions
9. Pay for Performance Linking Pay to Performance Jobs & Work Flows
Continues Appraisal Incentive Methods
Employee pay begins with a cash base and bonus pay, but may also contain non-cash forms of
compensation. The valuation of non-cash compensation is often most difficult for employees to
appreciate, but it offers the most opportunity for creativity on the part of the organization.
Pay Philosophy
“All organizations pay according to some underlying philosophy about jobs and the people who
do them”, says KP Kanchana, a professor at CFAI National College in Bhopal, India.
Compensation programs must consider and value the work of those who provide internal support
to the organization as well as those who directly impact financial results. An organization’s
compensation strategy will dictate the rate and timing of pay increases, which jobs are eligible
for bonuses, and the level of competitiveness with similar organizations.
Employee Incentive
Presentation of Compensation
How a manager speaks regarding pay can inadvertently create ill will when the intention was to
deliver good news. It is important to use specifics when speaking with employees rather than
categorize any pay increase as “good”, “significant” or some other qualifier. Employee
perceptions of compensation are based on individual values, needs and expectations.
Pay Competitiveness
Businesses wishing to compete for the best of the available talent pool must offer a competitive
compensation program compared to other companies within their industry and at large.
People are living longer, and thus, working longer. In a look at physician compensation, Max
Reibolt of The Coker Group noted a difference in work ethic and expected compensation that fell
along generational lines. Older workers were more likely to work longer hours in exchange for
their pay while younger workers expected high levels of pay even when their productivity was
aided by technology.
Multinational operations
Multinational corporations must balance the needs and expectations of employees from various
countries. Compensation must balance conformity with local laws and customs against global
corporate policies.
Labor costs often constitute the largest line in a corporation’s budget. In a tight economy,
companies are faced with a flat, if not shrinking, pool of funds. The cost of labor is broader than
the amount paid to employees, taking into account recruitment, training, turnover, infrastructure
and overhead, and the impact of these things on productivity.