Ind As 12
Ind As 12
Ind As 12
1
IND AS ON ITEMS
IMPACTING THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
UNIT 1:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 12 : INCOME TAXES
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
List the objective and scope of the standard
Define the terms used in the standard like accounting profit, taxable profit
(tax loss), tax expense (tax income), current tax, deferred tax liabilities,
deferred tax assets, temporary differences, taxable temporary differences,
deductible temporary differences and the tax base
Recognise current tax liabilities and current tax assets
Recognise deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets
Demonstrate when Ind AS permit or require certain assets to be carried at
fair value or to be revalued
Identify the situations where temporary difference may arise on initial
recognition of an asset or liability
Recognise deferred tax asset for all deductible temporary differences
Evaluate the cases, when a deferred tax asset arises on initial recognition
of an asset
UNIT OVERVIEW
• Accounting profit
• Taxable profit (tax loss)
• Tax expense (tax income)
• Current tax
• Deferred tax liabilities
Definition • Deferred tax assets
• Temporary differences
• Taxable temporary differences
• Deductible temporary differences
• Tax base
• Current Tax
Tax Expense • Deferred Tax
• Recognition
• Measurement
Current tax • Accounting of Current Tax Effects
• Offsetting Current Tax Assets and Current Tax Liabilities
1.1 OBJECTIVE
There was a time in India, few decades back when the concept of zero income tax entities was
prevalent. Due to various income tax benefits, these companies had no current tax liability for any
income tax that was payable based on that year’s accounting profit. Thus, no provision of income
tax was created. Profit after tax used to be equal to profit before tax. But from accounting
perspective, this was not a correct reflection of results. Quite a few of these tax benefits were
primarily accelerated benefits.
For example, depreciation was deductible in taxation on written down value method (WDV)
whereas in the books of accounts, entities could claim depreciation on straight line method (SLM).
As everybody knows that under WDV method, in initial years’ depreciation charge is greater than
depreciation under SLM. This resulted into accounting profits but no taxable profits. But over the
useful life of the asset, depreciation under both methods is equal. In later years, depreciation
charge under SLM would be higher than in depreciation under WDV. Therefore, in later years, in
such a situation, the taxable profits will be higher than the book profits. This will require a higher
tax provision in books when compared to the accounting profits of that year. Basically, this
differential will be due to non-provision of tax liability in an earlier year.
Example 1
An entity has acquired an asset for 10,000. The depreciation rate as per income tax is 40%
on WDV basis. In books of account, entity claims depreciation on equivalent SLM basis of
16.21%. The entity has accounting and taxable profits of 20,000 from year 1 to year 4,
inclusive, before any allowance of depreciation in either case.
The tax rate is 30%. Assuming no concept of deferred tax, the provision for current tax would be
computed as under:
Year 1 2 3 4
1.2 SCOPE
The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for income taxes.
Income taxes for the purpose of this Standard includes:
(a) all domestic and foreign taxes which are based on taxable profits;
(b) taxes, such as withholding taxes (Tax Deducted at Source), which are payable by a
subsidiary, associate or joint venture on distributions to the reporting entity.
Further, the income-tax for the purpose of this Standard could be classified as:
(a) Current tax being current tax consequence that arises due to transactions and other
events of the current period that are recognised in an entity’s financial statements.
(b) Deferred tax being future tax consequence that arises due to the future
(i) recovery of the carrying amount of assets or
(ii) settlement of carrying amount of the liabilities that are recognised in an entity’s
balance sheet. For example: Recovery of fixed assets means by way of
depreciation or sale and for other assets by way of realization.
Example 2
(a) Whenever an entity recognises an asset, it expects that it will recover the carrying value
of that asset. For example, if an entity recognises an item of land at 1,00,000, it
expects that it will be able to recover at least 1,00,000 if that land is sold sometime in
the future.
(b) Assume that under the income tax provisions, if this piece of land is sold after holding
it for more than one year, there will be an indexation benefit @ 10% per year. Thus, if
the land is sold after one year, the cost of the land will for the purpose of taxation will
be assumed at 1,10,000 ( 1,00,000 + 10%). If it is sold after two years, the cost of
the land for the purpose of taxation will be assumed at 1,21,000 ( 1,10,000 + 10%).
(c) The tax rate in all years continues to be flat 30%.
(d) Thus, the recovery of the carrying value of land after two years will result into a tax
saving of 6,300 i.e. 30% of 21,000 (1,21,000-1,00,000). For instance, if after two and
half years, the land is sold for 1,50,000, the entity will pay a tax of 8,700 at 30% of
29,000 ( 1,50,000 – 1,21,000). If there would have been no indexation benefits,
the tax liability would have been 15,000 at 30% of 50,000 ( 1,50,000 – 1,00,000).
Saving in tax is of 6,300 (15,000-8,700).
(e) In view of the above savings, the entity should recognise a deferred tax asset of 6,300
in this case in Year 1.
(f) This principle has to be applied to each item of asset or liability.
Note: There are controversial views in case of Indexation of land for a temporary difference
because if the land is not going to be sold in a near future particularly in business then in
such case it is not advisable to calculate temporary difference.
The Standard also provides guidance as to where the current tax or deferred tax should be
recognised, accounted and presented.
Tax Accounting
The Standard however, does not deal with the methods of accounting for government grants
(see Ind AS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government
Assistance) or investment tax credits. However, it deals with the accounting for temporary
differences that may arise from such grants or investment tax credits.
1.3 DEFINITIONS
Having understood, the basic concepts of current tax and deferred tax, the following definitions
needs to be appreciated:
(a) Accounting profit is profit or loss for a period before deducting tax expense.
(b) Taxable profit (tax loss) is the profit (loss) for a period, computed as per the income tax
act, upon which income taxes are payable (recoverable).
(c) Tax expense (tax income) is the aggregate amount included in the determination of profit
or loss for the period in respect of current tax and deferred tax.
(d) Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (recoverable) in respect of the taxable
profit (tax loss) for a period.
(e) Deferred tax liabilities are the amounts of income taxes payable in future periods in respect
of taxable temporary differences.
(f) Deferred tax assets are the amounts of income taxes recoverable in future periods in
respect of:
deductible temporary differences;
the carry forward of unused tax losses; and
the carry forward of unused tax credits.
(g) Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability
in the balance sheet and its tax base.
(h) Temporary differences may be either:
taxable temporary differences, which are temporary differences that will result in
taxable amounts in determining taxable profit (tax loss) of future periods when the
carrying amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled; or
deductible temporary differences, which are temporary differences that will result in
amounts that are deductible in determining taxable profit (tax loss) of future periods
when the carrying amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled.
Comparison with AS 22:
Timing differences are the differences between taxable income and accounting income
for a period that originate in one period and are capable of reversal in one or more
subsequent periods.
Thus, it can be seen that while AS 22 spoke of timing differences with reference to income,
The exact liability of current tax crystallises only on preparation and finalisation of
financial statements at the end of the reporting period.
Any excess of this liability over the prepaid taxes (advance tax) and withhold taxes
(TDS) is to be treated as current liability. This liability may be for the current reporting
period or may relate to earlier reporting periods.
(b) Current tax assets
If the amount already paid in respect of current and prior periods exceeds the amount
due for those periods, the excess shall be recognised as an asset.
1.5.3 Measurement
(a) Current tax liabilities (assets) for the current and prior periods shall be measured at the
amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the taxation authorities, using the tax rates
(and tax laws) that have been enacted.
(b) Uncertain tax position interpretations
An entity computes its current income-taxes in accordance with the provisions contained
in the taxation laws. Taxation laws provide certain benefits or require enhancements in
accordance with the fiscal, economic and other policies of the country. These at times
are prone to varying interpretations and settled by the appellate authorities after a
considerable period from the reporting period. The taxability remains uncertain.
Ind AS 12 requires that current tax liabilities or assets for the current period or the period
should be computed based on the amount it expects to pay. It is suggested that
statistical tools may be used in computing the current tax with respect to the uncertain
tax interpretations.
Thus, computation of current tax at best is an estimate. Any change in this estimate
based on subsequent developments should be treated as a change in estimate in
accordance with Ind AS 8.
(c) Enacted or substantive enacted
The tax rates in computing the current tax should be based on taxation laws that have
enacted or substantively enacted.
A proposed legislation is enacted when all the formalities with respect to the legislation
is completed. In India, the enactment occurs when the legislation is notified in the
gazette on and from the date it comes into force as mentioned in the said gazette
notification.
Implicit in the word ‘substantively enacted’ is the emphasis that in the relevant situation
the enactment process is not fully completed. The process of enactment of a taxation
current tax asset against a current tax liability when they relate to income taxes levied by the
same taxation authority and the taxation laws permit the entity to make or receive a single
net payment.
(c) In consolidated financial statements, a current tax asset of one entity in a group is offset
against a current tax liability of another entity in the group if, and only if, the entities
concerned have a legally enforceable right to make or receive a single net payment and the
entities intend to make or receive such a net payment or to recover the asset and settle the
liability simultaneously.
Illustration 1A
H Ltd. is a manufacturing company, wanting to calculate its taxable profit or loss for the year
ended 31 March 20X8. The statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income, the
balance sheet and the notes are given below.
Tax rate for the financial year 20X7-20X8 is 30%, but the new tax rate of 32%, for the year
20X8-20X9 and beyond, has already been enacted before the year end.
Calculate taxable profit for the financial year 20X7-20X8 and the related current tax expense.
Balance Sheet as of 31 March 20X8
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 4,20,00,000
Product development costs 21,00,000
Investment in subsidiary – S Ltd. 1,54,00,000
Current assets
Trading investments 72,80,000
Trade receivables 2,19,10,000
Inventories 1,06,40,000
Cash and cash equivalents 63,00,000
TOTAL ASSETS 10,56,30,000
EQUITY & LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital 4,20,00,000
Accumulated profits 2,86,24,330
Revaluation surplus 30,80,000
Extract of Statement of profit and loss for the year ended 31 March 20X8
Revenue 16,81,40,000
Cost of sales (13,44,00,000)
Gross profit 3,37,40,000
Operating costs (2,68,80,000)
Profit from operations 68,60,000
Finance costs (9,10,000)
Profit before taxation 59,50,000
Notes:
1. Depreciation expense for the year financial year 20X7-20X8 allowable as per the Income Tax
Rules is 72,10,000. Depreciation as allowed for the purposes of financial reporting included
in operating costs is 59,50,000. Cost of PPE is 5,60,00,000 and H Ltd. deducted
expenses of 1,45,60,000 in its tax returns prior to financial year 20X7-20X8. Further, as
of 31 March 20X8, H Ltd. for the first time revalued its property, plant and equipment to
market value of 4,20,00,000 (revaluation surplus = 30,80,000).
2. In 20X4-20X5, H Ltd. incurred product development costs of 35,00,000. These costs were
recognized as an asset and amortized over period of 10 years. For tax purposes,
H Ltd. deducted full product development costs when they were in 20X4-20X5.
3. Trading investments were acquired in the preceding year at a cost of 80,50,000. These
investments are classified as at fair value through profit or loss and thus recognized in their
fair value. Fair value adjustments are not allowable by the tax authorities.
4. Bad debt provision amounts to 45,50,000 and relates to 2 debtors: debtor A – 28,00,000
(receivable originates in 20X5-20X6 and 100% provision was recognized in the preceding
year) and debtor B – 17,50,000 (receivable originates in 20X6-20X7 and 100% provision
was recognized in F.Y. 20X7-20X8). Tax law allows deduction of 20% of provision for debtors
overdue for more than 1 year, another 30% for debtors overdue for more than 2 years and
remaining 50% for debtors overdue for more than 3 years.
5. H Ltd. created a provision for inventory obsolescence in accordance with Ind AS 2
requirements. New provision created in 20X7-20X8 was 3,78,000 (total provision:
6,30,000). Being a general provision, this provision is not tax deductible.
6. Government grants are not taxable. Full government grant received in 20X7-20X8 is included
in the balance sheet.
7. In 20X7-20X8, H Ltd. increased a liability for product warranty costs by 1,75,000. Product
warranty costs are not tax deductible until the company pays claims. Claims paid in
20X7-20X8 amounted to 2,17,000.
8. During the year, H Ltd. introduced health care benefits for employees. The expenses are
allowable for tax purposes only when benefits are paid but in line with Ind AS 19, recognized
in profit or loss when employees provide service.
9. Penalties towards violation of laws included in operating expenses amount to 63,000.
These are not deductible for tax purposes.
10. Tax law allows to deduct expenses for petrol only up to 1,40,000 per vehicle per year.
H Ltd. had 4 vehicles in 20X7-20X8 and its total petrol expenses amounted to 7,21,000.
Note: This illustration is prepared for the purposes of understanding the computation of current
tax and is in no way based on the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the purposes of
Financial Reporting, the tax treatments will be given in the question.
Solution:
Calculation of current tax expense
Accounting profit (A) 59,50,000
Add back:
Accounting depreciation 59,50,000
Amortization of product development costs (W.N.1) 3,50,000
Revaluation of trading investments 7,70,000
Bad debt provisions - 20X7-20X8 17,50,000
Inventory obsolescence provision 3,78,000
Product warranty costs provision - 20X7-20X8 1,75,000
Provision for health care benefit costs 24,50,000
Fines and Penalties disallowed for tax purposes 63,000
Petrol over limit (W.N.3) 1,61,000
Total (B) 120,47,000
Journal Entry
Working Notes:
1. Product development costs:
Annual amortization ( 35,00,000/ 10) 3,50,000
2. Bad debt provisions:
Debtor A - 28,00,000 from 20X5-20X6
> 2 years - 30% deductible in 20X7-20X8 8,40,000
Debtor B - 17,50,000 from 20X6-20X7
> 1 year - 20% deductible in 20X7-20X8 3,50,000
Total - tax deductible in 20X7-20X8 11,90,000
3. Petrol expenses
Actual expenses 7,21,000
Tax deductible (4 x 140,000) 5,60,000
Excess 1,61,000
*****
Examples 5-9
5. Entity A has inventory with carrying amount of 1,00,000 as at the reporting
date. It recovers the value of inventory through sale in a subsequent reporting
period. The sale value is the economic benefit derived by the entity and is
taxable. However, as per the matching and other concepts, against this sale
the entity is entitled to deduct its cost. The cost is the carrying amount of the
inventory i.e., 1,00,000. The tax base in this case is 1,00,000.
6. Entity A has acquired an item of asset for 1,00,000 for production of certain
items to be sold by the entity. It is deductible equally over two years in the
books of accounts. The carrying amount as the end of first reporting period
is 50,000 ( 1,00,000 – 50,000). In the income tax, 75,000 is deductible
in year 1 and balance is deductible in year 2. We have to compute its tax
base as on the last day of the first reporting period. However, in income-tax,
it can claim only 25,000 being 25% of the cost of the asset as 75% has
already been claimed in year 1. Thus, the tax base in this case is 25,000.
7. Interest receivable has a carrying amount of 100. The related interest
revenue will be taxed on a cash basis. The tax base of the interest receivable
is nil.
8. An entity that follows mercantile system of accounting has trade receivables
of 1,000. It creates a general bad debt allowance of 50. The carrying
amount in the books of accounts of trade receivables is thus 950. However,
in income-tax, general bad debt provision is not deductible. In the subsequent
period, entity is able to recover only 950. The amount recovered is a taxable
economic benefit. But for tax purposes, entity is entitled for a deduction of
1,000 against this recovery of trade receivable. The tax base in the current
year is 1,000.
9. An entity that follows mercantile system of accounting has trade receivables
of 1,000. It creates a specific bad debt of 50. The carrying amount in the
books of accounts of trade receivables is thus 950. In the subsequent
period, entity is able to recover only 950. Further, in income-tax, specific
bad debt provision is deductible in the very year it is created. The amount
recovered is a taxable economic benefit. For tax purposes, entity will be
entitled for a deduction of 950 against this recovery of trade receivable. The
tax base is 950.
If those economic benefits will not be taxable, the tax base of the asset is equal to
its carrying amount.
It is quite feasible that in certain cases, the economic benefits that are derived
from the recovery of an asset are not taxable. In these situations, the tax base of
the asset is taken at its carrying amount.
Example 16
Current liabilities include interest revenue received in advance, with a carrying
amount of 100. The related interest revenue was taxed on a cash basis.
The tax base of the interest received in advance is nil.
(iii) Items with a tax base but no carrying amount
There are certain items that have a tax base but no carrying amount. These
include items that are charged to revenue statement in the period in which they
are incurred but are allowed as a deduction over a number of periods as per the
taxation laws.
Examples 17 & 18
17. A Limited has been incorporated recently. It incurred 1,00,000 on its
incorporation. It has been charged to revenue in the very first accounting
period. The taxation laws allow deduction over a period of 5 years. The
carrying amount at the end of year 1 is Nil.
The tax base will be 80,000 (20,000 x 4) as 20,000 being 1/5 th is allowable
as a deduction in taxation laws over 4 years.
18. Public issue expenses. The entity may have written off the public issue
expenses in the very first year. But since tax laws permit deduction over 5
years, the temporary differences will exist till complete deduction is claimed
in taxation laws.
(iv) Items of assets and liabilities where tax base is not apparent
There could be situations where it may be difficult to compute the tax base of an
item. One however, knows the carrying amount. This is because of the provisions
of taxation laws. Whereas in books of accounts, all or most of the revenue and
gains are included as part of one single performance statement, in the taxation
laws they are charged under different head.
The taxable amount amongst other things depends under which head an item at
the time of recovery may be charged. In India, income or gains are charged either
as ‘Salaries’, ‘Income from house property’, ‘Profits and gains of business’, ‘Capital
Gain’ & ‘Income from other sources’. Further certain specific or weighted
deductions are also permissible. For example, rental income is subject to a flat
deduction. So how will you compute the rental income received in advance?
Moreover, there are cases depending upon the substance of the transaction, the
rental income is to be charged as business income. At times, reverse may be the
case. Many more similar situations could be anticipated.
Working Notes:
Temporary
Differences
(a) The term temporary difference is defined as the difference between the carrying amount of
an asset or liability in the balance sheet and its tax base.
Example 20
An entity has an item of plant and machinery acquired on the first day of the reporting
period for 1,00,000. It depreciates it @ 20% p.a on SLM basis. The carrying amount
in balance sheet is 80,000. The taxation laws require depreciation @ 30% on WDV
basis. The tax base at the end of the reporting period is 70,000. The temporary
difference is 10,000 ( 80,000 – 70,000).
(b) The contention in favour of temporary difference is that at the end of the day, all differences
between the carrying amount and tax base of an asset or liability will reverse. At most the
entity may be able to delay the timing of reversal but the difference will ultimately have
reversed, therefore the term ‘temporary difference’ is used. The cumulative impact is ‘zero’.
Example 21
An entity acquires an asset on the first day of reporting period for 120 with a useful life of
6 years and no residual value. It depreciates the asset on SLM basis. The tax rate is 30%.
The tax depreciation is as assumed in the computation below.
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Gross Block 120 120 120 120 120 120
Cumulative Depreciation (20) (40) (60) (80) (100) (120)
Carrying Amount 100 80 60 40 20 0
Tax Computation
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Tax base brought forward 120 30 20 13 8 3
Depreciation charge (assumed) (90) (10) (7) (5) (5) (3)
Tax base carried forward 30 20 13 8 3 0
Temporary Difference
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Carrying Amount 100 80 60 40 20 0
Tax base carried forward (30) (20) (13) (8) (3) 0
Temporary difference 70 60 47 32 17 0
Cumulative impact +70 –10 –13 –15 –15 –17
+70 –70
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Temporary difference 70 60 47 32 17 0
Deferred tax liability 21 18 14 10 5 0
Movement in provision +21 -3 -4 -4 -5 -5
Cumulative +21 -21
(c) To some, it may appear that temporary differences and timing differences are one and the
same term. It is not so. It can however, be said that temporary difference includes timing
differences. Timing differences arise when income or expense is included in accounting
profit in one period but is included in taxable profit in a different period.
(d) Examples of temporary differences in the nature of timing differences are as under.
Example 22
Interest income recognized in income statement on a time proportion basis but
recognized in taxable profit on cash basis as and when income is received.
Depreciation used in determining taxable income may differ from that used in
determining accounting profit.
Development costs may be capitalized and amortize over future periods in determining
accounting profit but deducted in determining taxable profit in the period in which they
are incurred.
(e) Examples of temporary differences other than in the nature of timing differences are as
under:
Example 23: Business combinations
The identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are
recognised at their fair values in accordance with Ind AS 103, Business Combinations, but
no equivalent adjustment is made for tax purposes.
With limited exceptions, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination are recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. Temporary differences
arise when the tax bases of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are not
affected by the business combination or are affected differently.
For example, when the carrying amount of an asset is increased to fair value but the tax base
of the asset remains at cost to the previous owner, a taxable temporary difference arises
which results in a deferred tax liability. However, it may be noted that the resulting deferred
tax liability affects goodwill.
Example 24: Revaluation: assets are revalued and no equivalent adjustment is made
for tax purposes.
Indian Accounting Standards permit or require certain assets to be carried at fair value or to
be revalued (see, for example, Ind AS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, Ind AS 38,
Intangible Assets, Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments and Ind AS 116 Leases).
In some jurisdictions, the revaluation or other restatement of an asset to fair value affects
taxable profit (tax loss) for the current period. As a result, the tax base of the asset is
adjusted and no temporary difference arises.
In other jurisdictions, the revaluation or restatement of an asset does not affect taxable profit
in the period of the revaluation or restatement and, consequently, the tax base of the asset
is not adjusted.
Nevertheless, the future recovery of the carrying amount will result in a taxable flow of
economic benefits to the entity and the amount that will be deductible for tax purposes will
(c) Deductible temporary differences are those temporary differences that results in amounts
that are deductible in determining taxable profit (tax loss) of future periods when the carrying
amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled.
Again, it should be noted, the name ‘deductible temporary difference’ suggests, these are
the temporary differences that will be deducted in future when computing the tax liability.
These deductible temporary differences will reduce tax liabilities. All deductible temporary
differences, subject to exceptions/recognition criteria, give rise to deferred tax assets.
Deductible temporary difference arises where the:
carrying amount of a liability exceeds its tax base; or
tax base of an asset exceeds its carrying amount.
Example 26
An entity recognises a liability of 100 for gratuity and leave encashment expenses
by creating a provision for gratuity and leave encashment. For tax purposes, any
amount with regard to gratuity and leave encashment will not be deductible until the
entity pays the same. The tax rate is 25%.
The tax base of the liability is nil (carrying amount of 100, less the amount that will
be deductible for tax purposes in respect of that liability in future periods). In settling
the liability for its carrying amount, the entity will reduce its future taxable profit by an
amount of 100 and, consequently, reduce its future tax payments by 25 ( 100 at
25%). The difference between the carrying amount of 100 and the tax base of nil
is a deductible temporary difference of 100.
(d) Based on the above discussions, a matrix as under may be drawn:
For Assets For Liabilities
If carrying amount > Taxable Temporary Deductible Temporary
tax base Difference Difference
↓ ↓
Deferred Tax Liability Deferred Tax Asset
(e.g. WDV as per books > (e.g. Provision for Bonus as
WDV as per Income Tax) per books > Provision for
Bonus as per IT)
If carrying amount < Deductible Temporary Taxable Temporary
tax base Difference Difference
↓ ↓
Deferred Tax Asset Deferred Tax Liability
(e.g. WDV as per books < (e.g. Loan carrying amount
WDV as per Income Tax) as per books< Loan carrying
amounts as per tax)
If carrying amount = No temporary difference No temporary difference
tax base
*****
1.6.5 Step 5: Identify exceptions
(a) Exception 1: The initial recognition of goodwill in the case of a business combination
In the case of a business combination, when the consideration paid exceeds the net
identifiable assets, goodwill is created.
Technically speaking, goodwill arising in a business combination is measured as the
excess of (a) over (b) below:
(a) the aggregate of:
(i) the consideration transferred measured in accordance with Ind AS 103, which
generally requires acquisition date fair value;
(ii) the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree recognized in
accordance with Ind AS 103; and
(iii) in a business combination achieved in stages, the acquisition-date fair value
of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree.
(b) the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed measured in accordance with Ind AS 103.
As per principles enunciated in this Ind AS 12, the entity has to determine the tax base
of this goodwill to compute the temporary difference, either taxable or deductible, at the
time of recognition and subsequently when impairment takes place. The Standard
provides separate guidance for taxable temporary difference (Situation A) and
deductible temporary difference (Situation B).
Situation A: Where the temporary difference is in the nature of taxable temporary
difference. Again, in this case, the prescribed treatment is different where good will is
deferred tax liability should be 13,650 (45,500 x 30%) and not 10,500.
Thus, deferred tax liability in entry 2 should be increased by 3,150 which in
turn will increase goodwill by a similar amount. This is going to inflate the
goodwill since the impact is taken in goodwill itself.
Therefore, no deferred tax liability is to be recognised in the case of taxable
temporary difference arising on the initial recognition of goodwill in a business
combination in tax jurisdiction where such goodwill is not tax deductible.
(b) Subsequently at the time of impairment, if required, in the carrying amount:
(i) This goodwill as per Ind AS 103 is not amortised though tested for impairment.
(ii) Subsequent reduction in a deferred tax liability that is unrecognised because
it arises from the initial recognition of goodwill is also regarded as arising from
the initial recognition of goodwill and is therefore not recognised.
Example 36
In the aforesaid Example 35, after 2 years goodwill is tested for impairment
and the entity recognises an impairment loss of 10,000, the amount of the
taxable temporary difference relating to the goodwill is reduced from 35,000
to 25,000, with a resulting decrease in the value of the unrecognised
deferred tax liability. That decrease in the value of the unrecognised deferred
tax liability is also regarded as relating to the initial recognition of the goodwill
and is therefore prohibited from being recognised as per this Ind AS 12.
Situation A2: Where it is tax deductible
In tax jurisdiction, where goodwill is tax deductible, deferred tax liability should be
recognised for the taxable temporary difference.
Situation B: where the difference is in the nature of deductible difference
In all cases, deferred tax asset, subject to recognition criteria discussed in step 6 below,
should be recognised.
Summary of Exception 1
No deferred tax liability is to be recognised for taxable temporary difference arising on
goodwill arising in a business combination in tax jurisdictions where such goodwill is not
tax deductible.
In all other cases of temporary difference, either taxable or deferred, either deferred tax
liability or deferred tax asset should be recognised in accordance with other provisions
of this Ind AS.
The non-monetary assets and liabilities of an entity are measured in its functional
currency (see Ind AS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates) in the
exchange rate which give rise to temporary differences that result in a recognised
deferred tax liability or (subject to recognition criteria) asset. The resulting deferred tax
is charged or credited to profit or loss.
Associate: An investor in an associate does not control that entity and is usually not in
a position to determine its dividend policy. Therefore, in the absence of an agreement
requiring that the profits of the associate will not be distributed in the foreseeable future,
an investor recognises a deferred tax liability arising from taxable temporary differences
associated with its investment in the associate. In some cases, an investor may not be
able to determine the amount of tax that would be payable if it recovers the cost of its
investment in an associate, but can determine that it will equal or exceed a minimum
amount. In such cases, the deferred tax liability is measured at this amount.
Joint Venture: The arrangement between the parties to a joint venture usually deals
with the sharing of the profits and identifies whether decisions on such matters require
the consent of all the venturers or a specified majority of the venturers. When the
venturer can control the sharing of profits and it is probable that the profits will not be
distributed in the foreseeable future, a deferred tax liability is not recognised.
The aforesaid discussion related to recognition of deferred tax liability on taxable
temporary difference. But there could be deductible temporary differences. So what is
the guiding principle for recognition of deferred tax assets on deductible temporary
differences?
Solution
In relation to unused trading losses, the carrying amount is zero since the losses have not
yet been recognised in the financial statements of H Ltd. A potential deferred tax asset does
arise but the determination of the tax base is more problematic.
The tax base of an asset is the amount which will be deductible against taxable economic
benefits from recovering the carrying amount of the asset. Where recovery of an asset will
have no tax consequences, the tax base is equal to the carrying amount. H Ltd. operates
under a tax jurisdiction which only allows losses to be carried forward for two years. The
maximum the tax base could be is therefore equal to the amount of unused losses for years
20X0 and 20X1 since these only are available to be deducted from future profits. The tax
base though needs to be restricted to the extent that there is a probability of sufficient future
profits to offset the trading losses. The directors of H Ltd. should base their forecast of the
future profitability on reasonable and supportable assumptions. There appears to be
evidence that this is not the case.
H Ltd. has accumulated trading losses and there is little evidence that there will be an
improvement in trading results within the next couple of years. The market is depressed and
sales orders for the first quarter of 20X2 are below levels in any of the previous five years.
The forecast profitability for 20X2 and subsequent growth rate therefore appear to be
unrealistically optimistic.
Given that losses can only be carried forward for a maximum of two years, it is unlikely that
any deferred tax asset should be recognised.
Hence, the contention of directors to recognized deferred tax assets in relation to
250 crores is not correct.
*****
Example 39
Entity A has deductible temporary difference of 1,00,000 for the financial year ended
31 st March, 20X1. It anticipates a future profit of 3,00,000 in next year against which the
said deductible temporary differences could be set off. The tax rate is 30%. Thus, in future
the entity will pay tax on 2,00,000 ( 3,00,000 – 1,00,000). The tax liability is 60,000
@ 30% tax rate.
Had there been no deductible temporary difference, the tax liability would be 90,000
@ 30% on 3,00,000. Thus, there is an inflow of economic benefit of 30,000 through a
lower cash outflow.
However, if there is no probability of taxable profits in future, the entity is not able to derive
any economic benefit (by way of lower cash outflow in future) because of the existing of
deductible temporary difference.
The entity can recognise deferred tax assets for the entire deductible temporary
differences.
Example 40
As at 31 st March, 20X1, an entity has both taxable temporary differences and deductible
temporary difference with the following reversal pattern. Deductible temporary differences
cannot be carried forward.
Particulars Year
1 2 3
Taxable temporary difference
Opening balance 10,000 5,000 2,000
Recognized in taxable income 5,000 3,000 2,000
Closing balance 5,000 2,000 -
Deductible temporary difference
Opening balance 8,000 4,000 -
Recognized in taxable income 4,000 4,000 -
Closing balance 4,000 - -
Statement of taxable income
Taxable temporary difference 5,000 3,000 2,000
Deductible temporary difference 4,000 4,000 -
The entity can recognize deferred tax assets for the deductible temporary differences up to
7,000 ( 4,000 for year 1 & 3,000 for year 2) as a taxable temporary difference of that
amount is available.
Criteria No. 2: Probability of future profits
The entity has to apply probability criteria on its future profitability. If it is probable that there
will be sufficient taxable profits, then to the extent of available profits, deductible temporary
differences should be applied for recognition of deferred tax assets.
Examples 41- 43
41. If in the aforesaid example 40, the entity expects a profit of 750 in year 2, then deferred
tax asset should be created on 7,750 ( 4,000 + 3,000 + 750).
However, taxable profits arising in future from future origination of deductible temporary
differences should not be considered as deductible temporary differences will require
future taxable profits for utilisation.
42. An entity has unutilised deductible temporary difference of 1,000 at the end of year 1
that is going to be reversed in the year 2. In year 2, taxable profits are computed
because of tax disallowances of unpaid statutory liabilities of 1,000 which can be
claimed as deduction only in year 3, if paid, but cannot be carried forward. The entity
expects nil taxable profit in year 3. In this case, no deferred tax asset will be created.
tax credits can be utilised by the entity. In such circumstances, paragraph 82 of Ind AS
12 requires disclosure of the amount of the deferred tax asset and the nature of the
evidence supporting its recognition.
(e) When an entity has a history of recent losses, the entity should consider the following
guidance:
The criteria for recognising deferred tax assets arising from the carry forward of unused
tax losses and tax credits are the same as the criteria for recognising deferred tax
assets arising from deductible temporary differences.
However, the existence of unused tax losses is strong evidence that future taxable profit
may not be available. Therefore, when an entity has a history of recent losses, the entity
recognises a deferred tax asset arising from unused tax losses or tax credits only to the
extent that the entity has sufficient taxable temporary differences or there is convincing
other evidence that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which the unused
tax losses or unused tax credits can be utilised by the entity.
In such circumstances, this Ind AS requires disclosure of the amount of the deferred tax
asset and the nature of the evidence supporting its recognition.
To assess the probability that taxable profit will be available against which the unused
tax losses or unused tax credits can be utilised, the entity should consider the following:
(i) whether the entity has sufficient taxable temporary differences relating to the same
taxation authority and the same taxable entity, which will result in taxable amounts
against which the unused tax losses or unused tax credits can be utilised before
they expire;
(ii) whether it is probable that the entity will have taxable profits before the unused tax
losses or unused tax credits expire;
(iii) whether the unused tax losses result from identifiable causes which are unlikely to
recur; and
(iv) whether tax planning opportunities are available to the entity that will create
taxable profit in the period in which the unused tax losses or unused tax credits
can be utilised.
To the extent that it is not probable that taxable profit will be available against which the
unused tax losses or unused tax credits can be utilised, the deferred tax asset is not to
be recognised.
(f) Reassessment of unrecognised Deferred Tax Assets:
At the end of each reporting period, the entity should reassess unrecognised deferred
tax assets. It may need to recognise a previously unrecognised deferred tax asset to
be ignored. Therefore, deferred tax assets are recognised and carried forward only to the extent
that there is a reasonable certainty of their realisation. This reasonable level of certainty would
normally be achieved by examining the past record of the enterprise and by making realistic
estimates of profits for the future.
Para 17: Where an enterprise has unabsorbed depreciation or carry forward of losses under tax
laws, deferred tax assets should be recognised only to the extent that there is virtual certainty
supported by convincing evidence that sufficient future taxable income will be available against
which such deferred tax assets can be realised.
Ind AS 12 and AS 22 both require exercise of prudence while recognizing deferred tax assets.
However, AS 22 emphasizes on virtual certainty supported by convincing evidence for recognizing
deferred tax asset, whereas Ind AS 12 requires only probable existence of taxable profit against
which deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Thus, the requirement of recognizing
deferred tax asset under AS 22 is very strict (virtual certainty moves towards more than 95%
certainty through evidence such as a strong order book for the future, firm orders in hand etc.),
whereas under Ind AS 12, the same is more realistic focusing only on probable existence of
taxable profits. Ind AS 12 moves to exercise caution only in case of unused tax losses, where it
specifies that deferred tax asset arising from unused tax losses or tax credits can be recognized
only to the extent that the entity has sufficient taxable temporary differences or there is convincing
other evidence that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses
or unused tax credits can be utilised by the entity.
tax asset of another taxable entity will result in decreased payments by that second taxable
entity.
Illustration 3
On 1 st April 20X1, S Ltd. leased a machine over a 5 year period. The present value of lease
liability is 120 Cr (discount rate of 8%) and is recognized as lease liability and corresponding
Right of Use (RoU) Asset on the same date. The RoU Asset is depreciated under straight line
method over the 5 years. The annual lease rentals are 30 Cr payable starting 31 st March 20X2.
The tax law permits tax deduction on the basis of payment of rent.
Assuming tax rate of 30%, you are required to explain the deferred tax consequences for the
above transaction for the year ended 31 st March 20X2.
Solution
A temporary difference effectively arises between the value of the machine for accounting
purposes and the amount of lease liability, since the rent payment is eligible for tax deduction.
Tax base of the machine is nil as the amount is not eligible for deduction for tax purposes.
Tax base of the lease liability is nil as it is measured at carrying amount less any future tax
deductible amount
Recognition of deferred tax on 31 st March 20X2:
Carrying amount in balance sheet
RoU Asset (120 Cr – 24 Cr (Depreciation)) 96.00 Dr
Lease Liability (120 Cr + 9.60 Cr (120 Cr x 8%) - 30 Cr) 99.60 Cr
Net Amount 3.60 Cr
Tax Base 0.00 Cr
Temporary Difference (deductible) 3.60 Cr
Deferred Tax asset to be recognized ( 3.60 Cr x 30%) 1.08 Cr
*****
Give the accounting for the above transaction for deferred tax for period ending 31 st March, 20X2
and 31 st March, 20X3. Assume that there are sufficient taxable profits available in future against
any deferred tax assets. Tax rate of 30% is applicable to P Ltd.
Solution:
On 31 st March 20X2:
The tax benefit is calculated as under:
Carrying amount of Share based payment 0.00 Cr
Tax Base of Share based payment ( 1.60 Cr x ½) 0.80 Cr
Temporary Difference (Carrying amount – tax base) 0.80 Cr
Deferred Tax Asset recognized (Temporary Difference x Tax rate)
(0.80 Cr x 30%) 0.24 Cr
Journal Entry for above:
Deferred Tax Asset Dr. 0.24 Cr
To Tax Expense 0.24 Cr
(Being DTA recognized on equity option)
On 31 st March 20X3:
The options have been exercised and a current tax benefit will be available to the entity on the
basis of intrinsic value of 4.60 Cr. Initially recognized deferred tax asset will no longer be
required.
The accounting entry will be done as under:
Tax Expense Dr 0.24 Cr
To Deferred Tax Asset 0.24 Cr
(Being DTA reversed on the exercise of the option)
*****
1.7.3 Change in tax status of an entity or its shareholders
(a) A change in the tax status of an entity or of its shareholders may have consequences for an
entity by increasing or decreasing its tax liabilities or assets. This may, for example, occur
upon the public listing of an entity’s equity instruments or upon the restructuring of an entity’s
equity. It may also occur upon a controlling shareholder’s move to a foreign country. As a
result of such an event, an entity may be taxed differently; it may for example gain or lose
tax incentives or become subject to a different rate of tax in the future.
Those tax consequences that relate to changes in the recognised amount of equity, in
the same or a different period (not included in profit or loss), shall be charged or credited
directly to equity.
Those tax consequences that relate to amounts recognised in other comprehensive
income shall be recognised in other comprehensive income.
(d) This Ind AS requires disclosure of the aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items
that are charged or credited directly to equity.
Particulars Amount ( )
Accounting profit 1,00,000
Tax at the applicable tax rate of 30% 30,000
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining
taxable profits:
Penalties 3,000
Tax expense 33,000
The effective tax rate is as per the national income-tax rate.
Particulars %
Applicable tax rate 30
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable
profits - Penalties 3
Average effective tax rate 33
The effective tax rate is as per the national income-tax rate.
(c) These disclosures enable users of financial statements to understand whether the
relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit is unusual and to
understand the significant factors that could affect that relationship in the future. The
relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit may be affected by such
factors as revenue that is exempt from taxation, expenses that are not deductible in
determining taxable profit (tax loss), the effect of tax losses and the effect of foreign tax
rates.
(d) In explaining the relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit, an entity
uses an applicable tax rate that provides the most meaningful information to the users of its
financial statements. Often, the most meaningful rate is the domestic rate of tax in the
country in which the entity is domiciled, aggregating the tax rate applied for national taxes
with the rates applied for any local taxes which are computed on a substantially similar level
of taxable profit (tax loss).
3. Annual Report of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. for the year ending 31 st March 2022 (Page 438)
4. Annual Report of SpiceJet Ltd. for the year ending 31 st March 2022 (Page 110)
(e) However, for an entity operating in several jurisdictions, it may be more meaningful to
aggregate separate reconciliations prepared using the domestic rate in each individual
jurisdiction. The following example illustrates how the selection of the applicable tax rate
affects the presentation of the numerical reconciliation.
Example 48
In 20X2, an entity has accounting profit in its own jurisdiction (country A) of 1,500 (20X1:
The impact of different tax rates is disclosed separately in Consolidated Financial Statements
whose extract is given below [10th line item with amounts of ₹ 2,594 and ₹ (13,887)]:
Illustration 6
A Ltd.’s profit before tax according to Ind AS for Year 20X1-20X2 is 100 thousand and taxable
profit for year 20X1-20X2 is 104 thousand. The difference between these amounts arose as
follows:
1. On 1 st February, 20X2, it acquired a machine for 120 thousand. Depreciation is charged
on the machine on a monthly basis for accounting purpose. Under the tax law, the machine
will be depreciated for 6 months. The machine’s useful life is 10 years according to Ind AS
as well as for tax purposes.
2. In the year 20X1-20X2, expenses of 8 thousand were incurred for charitable donations.
These are not deductible for tax purposes.
Prepare necessary entries as at 31 st March 20X2, taking current and deferred tax into account.
The tax rate is 25%. Also prepare the tax reconciliation in absolute numbers as well as the tax
rate reconciliation.
Solution
Current tax= Taxable profit x Tax rate = 104 thousand x 25% = 26 thousand.
Computation of Taxable Profit:
in thousand
Accounting profit 100
Add: Donation not deductible 8
Less: Excess Depreciation (6-2) (4)
Total Taxable profit 104
in thousand in thousand
Profit & loss A/c Dr. 26
To Current Tax 26
Deferred tax:
Machine’s carrying amount according to Ind AS is 118 thousand ( 120 thousand –
2 thousand)
Machine’s carrying amount for taxation purpose = 114 thousand ( 120 thousand –
6 thousand)
*****
1.8.5 Disclosure 5: Change in tax rates
(a) The applicable tax rates may change due to variety of reasons. There could be a change in
the manner of recovery of the asset. The tax laws may have changed. There could be a
change in the structure of the entity.
(b) In case there are changes in the applicable tax rate(s) compared to the previous accounting
period, an explanation has to be provided.
1.8.6 Disclosure 6: Unrecognised deductible temporary differences,
unused tax losses and unused tax credits
(a) The Standard lays down criteria for recognising deferred tax assets on deductible temporary
differences, unused tax losses and unused tax credits. For example, whether a sufficient
taxable temporary difference is available, is there a probability of future profits and are there
any tax planning opportunities.
(b) If the laid down recognition criteria could not be met, no deferred tax asset is recognised on
these deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses and unused tax credits.
(c) The Standard requires the amount (and expiry date, if any) of deductible temporary
differences, unused tax losses, and unused tax credits for which no deferred tax asset is
recognised in the balance sheet, to be disclosed.
Relevant Extracts from Financial Statements of selected Listed Entities are presented below:
A. Annual Report of SpiceJet Ltd. for the year ending 31 st March 2022 (Page 111):
A Annual Report of SpiceJet Ltd. for the year ending 31 March 2022 (Page 111):
B. Annual Report of Larsen and Toubro Ltd. for the year ending 31 March 2020 (Page 416):
the amount of the deferred tax income or expense recognised in profit or loss, if this is
not apparent from the changes in the amounts recognised in the balance sheet.
Annual Report of SpiceJet Ltd. for the year ending 31 st March 2020 (Page 415):
Illustration 7
An entity has a deductible temporary difference of 50,000. It has no taxable temporary
differences against which it can be offset. The entity is also not anticipating any future profits.
However, it can implement a tax planning strategy which can generate profits up to 60,000. The
cost of implementing this tax planning strategy is 12,000. The tax rate is 30%. Compute the
deferred tax asset that should be recognised.
Solution
The entity should recognise a deferred tax asset of 14,400 @ 30% of 48,000 ( 60,000 –
12,000).
The balance deferred tax asset of 600 @ 30% on 2,000 ( 50,000 – 48,000) shall remain
unrecognised.
*****
Illustration 8
A Limited recognises interest income in its books on accrual basis. However, for income tax
purposes the method is ‘cash basis’. On 31 st December, 20X1, it has interest receivable of
10,000 and the tax rate was 25%. On 28 th February, 20X2, the finance bill is introduced in the
legislation that changes the tax rate to 30%. The finance bill is enacted as Act on 21 st May, 20X2.
Discuss the treatment of deferred tax in case the reporting date of A Limited’s financial statement
is 31 st December, 20X1 and these are approved for issued on 31 st May, 20X2.
Solution
The difference of 10,000 between the carrying value of interest receivable of 10,000 and its
tax base of NIL is a taxable temporary difference.
A Limited has to recognise a deferred tax liability of 2,500 ( 10,000 x 25%) in its financial
statements for the reporting period ended on 31 st December, 20X1.
It will not recognise the deferred tax liability @ 30% because as on 31 st December, 20X1, this tax
rate was neither substantively enacted or enacted on the reporting date. However, if the effect of
this change is material, A Limited should disclose this difference in its financial statements.
*****
Illustration 9
A Ltd prepares financial statements to 31 st March each year. The rate of income tax applicable
to A Ltd is 20%. The following information relates to transactions, assets and liabilities of A Ltd
during the year ended 31 st March 20X2:
(i) A Ltd has a 40% shareholding in L Ltd. A Ltd purchased this shareholding for 45 Cr. The
shareholding gives A Ltd significant influence over L Ltd but not control and therefore A Ltd.
(B) Charge to Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31 st March 20X2:
Investment in L Ltd.
Particulars Carrying amount Tax Base Temporary
Difference
Opening Balance (1 st April 20X1) 70 Cr 45 Cr 25 Cr
Closing Balance (31 st March 20X2) 75 Cr 45 Cr 30 Cr
Net Change 5 Cr
Increase in Deferred Tax Liability (20% tax rate) 1 Cr
Considering the increase in the value of investment arising through Statement of Profit or
Loss, the accounting for the increase in deferred tax liability is made as under:
Tax expense (Profit or Loss Statement) Dr 1 Cr
To Deferred Tax Liability 1 Cr
(Being increase in deferred tax liability recognized)
Head Office Building:
The deferred tax liability at 31 st March 20X1 is 3.6 Cr (20% x { 40 Cr – 22 Cr}).
At 31 st March 20X2, prior to revaluation, the carrying amount of the property is 38 Cr and
its tax base is 20.75 Cr ( 22 Cr – 1.25 Cr). The deferred tax liability at this point is
3.45 Cr (20% x { 38 Cr – 20.75 Cr}).
The reduction in this liability is 0.15 Cr ( 3.6 Cr – 3.45 Cr). This would be credited to
income tax expense in arriving at profit or loss.
Post revaluation, the carrying value of the building becomes 45 Cr and the tax base stays
the same. Therefore, the new deferred tax liability is 4.85 Cr (20% x ( 45 Cr –
20.75 Cr)). The increase in the deferred tax liability of 1.4 Cr ( 4.85 Cr – 3.45 Cr) is
charged to other comprehensive income.
*****
Illustration 10
K Ltd prepares consolidated financial statements to 31 st March each year. During the year ended
31 st March 20X2, K Ltd entered into the following transactions:
(a) On 1 st April 20X1, K Ltd purchased an equity investment for 2,00,000. The investment was
designated as fair value through other comprehensive income. On 31 st March 20X2, the fair
value of the investment was 2,40,000. In the tax jurisdiction in which K Ltd operates,
unrealised gains and losses arising on the revaluation of investments of this nature are not
nil. The deductible temporary difference of 80,000 would create a deferred tax asset of
20,000 ( 80,000 x 25%). The asset can be recognised because K Ltd has sufficient
taxable profits against which to utilise the deductible temporary difference.
*****
Explain and show how each of these events would affect the deferred tax assets / liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheet of PQR Ltd. group at 31 st March, 20X2 as per Ind AS. The
rate of corporate income tax is 30%.
9. An entity is finalising its financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2. Before
31 st March, 20X2, the government announced that the tax rate was to be amended from
40 per cent to 45 per cent of taxable profit from 30 th June, 20X2.
The legislation to amend the tax rate has not yet been approved by the legislature. However,
the government has a significant majority and it is usual, in the tax jurisdiction concerned, to
regard an announcement of a change in the tax rate as having the substantive effect of actual
enactment (i.e. it is substantively enacted).
After performing the income tax calculations at the rate of 40 per cent, the entity has the
following deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability balances:
Of the deferred tax asset balance, 28,000 related to a temporary difference. This deferred
tax asset had previously been recognised in OCI and accumulated in equity as a revaluation
surplus.
The entity reviewed the carrying amount of the asset in accordance with para 56 of
Ind AS 12 and determined that it was probable that sufficient taxable profit to allow utilisation
of the deferred tax asset would be available in the future.
Show the revised amount of Deferred tax asset & Deferred tax liability and present the
necessary journal entries.
10. On 1 st January 20X2, entity H acquired 100% share capital of entity S for 15,00,000. The
book values and the fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities of entity S at the date
of acquisition are set out below, together with their tax bases in entity S’s tax jurisdictions.
Any goodwill arising on the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. The tax rates in
entity H’s and entity S’s jurisdictions are 30% and 40% respectively.
You are required to calculate the deferred tax arising on acquisition of Entity S. Also
calculate the Goodwill arising on acquisition.
Answers
1. The tax base of the asset is 60 (cost of 150 less cumulative tax depreciation of 90).
To recover the carrying amount of 100, the entity must earn taxable income of 100, but
will only be able to deduct tax depreciation of 60. Consequently, the entity will pay income
taxes of 10 ( 40 at 25%) when it recovers the carrying amount of the asset. The difference
between the carrying amount of 100 and the tax base of 60 is a taxable temporary
difference of 40. Therefore, the entity recognises a deferred tax liability of 10 ( 40 at
25%) representing the income taxes that it will pay when it recovers the carrying amount of
the asset.
2. A taxable temporary difference of 5 crore exists between the carrying value of the
investment in XYZ at the reporting date of 4,378 crore ( 4,373 crore + 5 crore) and its
tax base of 4,373 crore. Since a parent, by definition, controls a subsidiary, it will be able
to control the reversal of this temporary difference, for example - through control of the
dividend policy of the subsidiary. Therefore, deferred tax on such temporary difference is
generally not provided unless it is probable that the temporary will reverse in the foreseeable
future.
3. A taxable temporary difference of 50 crore therefore exists between the carrying value of
the investment in PQR at the reporting date of 1,050 crore ( 1,000 crore + 50 crore) and
its tax base of 1,000 crore. As ABC Ltd. does not completely control PQR Ltd. it is not in
a position to control the dividend policy of PQR Ltd. As a result, it cannot control the reversal
of this temporary difference and deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on
investments in PQR Ltd. i.e. 50 crore.
4. Calculation of the Book Value as per financial and tax purposes.
Financial Accounting: 000’s
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Gross Block 100 100 100 100 100
Accumulated Depreciation 20 40 60 80 100
Carrying Amount 80 60 40 20 0
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Gross Block 100 100 100 100 100
Accumulated Depreciation 25 50 75 100 100
Carrying Amount 75 50 25 0 0
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Carrying Amount 80 60 40 20 0
Tax Base 75 50 25 0 0
Difference 5 10 15 20 0
Deferred Tax Liability (Difference x 30%) 1.5 3 4.5 6 0
5. In this case there is a Deferred Tax Asset as the Tax base of assets acquired is higher by
25,000. DTA would be 7,500 (25,000 x 30%)
Journal entry:
Plant and equipment Dr 250
Inventory Dr 120
Debtors Dr 200
Goodwill Dr 22.5 (30- 7.5)
DTA Dr 7.5
To 9% Debentures 100
To Bank 500
6. The year-wise anticipated reversal of temporary differences is as under:
B Limited will recognise a deferred tax liability of 2,700 on taxable temporary difference
relating to accelerated depreciation of 9,000 @ 30%.
However, it will limit and recognise a deferred tax asset on reversal of deductible temporary
difference relating to preliminary expenses reversing up to year ending 31 st March, 20X4
amounting to 900 ( 3,000 @ 30%). No deferred tax asset shall be recognized for the
reversal of deductible temporary difference for the year ending on 31 st March, 20X5 as there
are no taxable temporary differences. Further, the outlook is also a loss. However, if there
are tax planning opportunities that could be identified for the year ending on 31 st March, 20X5
deferred tax asset on the remainder of 1,000 ( 4,000 – 3,000) of deductible temporary
difference could be recognised at the 30% tax rate.
7. (i) The tax loss creates a potential deferred tax asset for the group since its carrying value
is nil and its tax base is 30,00,000.
However, no deferred tax asset can be recognised because there is no prospect of
being able to reduce tax liabilities in the foreseeable future as no taxable profits are
anticipated.
(ii) The provision creates a potential deferred tax asset for the group since its carrying value
is 20,00,000 and its tax base is nil.
This deferred tax asset can be recognised because X Ltd. is expected to generate
taxable profits in excess of 20,00,000 in the year to 31 st March, 20X3.
The amount of the deferred tax asset will be 4,00,000 ( 20,00,000 x 20%).
This asset will be presented as a deduction from the deferred tax liabilities caused by
the (larger) taxable temporary differences.
(iii) The development costs have a carrying value of 15,20,000 ( 16,00,000 –
( 16,00,000 x 1/5 x 3/12)).
The tax base of the development costs is nil since the relevant tax deduction has already
been claimed.
The deferred tax liability will be 3,04,000 ( 15,20,000 x 20%). All deferred tax
liabilities are shown as non-current.
(iv) The carrying value of the loan at 31 st March, 20X2 is 1,07,80,000 ( 1,00,00,000 –
2,00,000 + ( 98,00,000 x 10%)).
The tax base of the loan is 1,00,00,000.
The net adjustment to deferred tax expense is a reduction of 2,500. Of this amount,
3,500 is recognised in OCl and 1,000 is charged to P&L.
The amounts are calculated as follows:
Carrying Carrying Increase (decrease)
amount amount in deferred tax
at 45% at 40% expense
Deferred tax assets
Previously credited to OCI-equity 31,500 28,000 (3,500)
Previously recognised as Income 58,500 52,000 (6,500)
90,000 80,000 (10,000)
Deferred tax liability
Previously recognized as expense 67,500 60,000 7,500
Net adjustment (2,500)
Journal Entries
10. Calculation of Net assets acquired (excluding the effect of deferred tax liability):
’000 ’000
Fair values of S’s identifiable assets and liabilities (excluding 1,070
deferred tax)
Less: Tax base (920)
Temporary difference arising on acquisition 150
Net deferred tax liability arising on acquisition of entity S 60
( 1,50,000 @ 40%)
Purchase consideration 1,500
Note: Since, the tax base of the goodwill is nil, taxable temporary difference of 4,90,000
arises on goodwill. However, no deferred tax is recognised on the goodwill. The deferred
tax on other temporary differences arising on acquisition is provided at 40% and not 30%,
because taxes will be payable or recoverable in entity S’s tax jurisdictions when the
temporary differences will be reversed.