Effete Ness
Effete Ness
Effete Ness
Century Bengal
Author(s): John Rosselli
Source: Past & Present , Feb., 1980, No. 86 (Feb., 1980), pp. 121-148
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Past and Present Society
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/650742?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
and Oxford University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Past & Present
too little (one newspaper put forward both these explanations within
three weeks). A rice diet, short of meat and other animal products,
was "weak and innutritious". Newfangled medicines were harmful;
alcohol had ravaged many constitutions. Early parenthood caused
children to be born with "a homeopathic fund of vitality". Above all,
educated Bengalis had concentrated to excess on their studies: whence
all manner of ills, from "indigestion and brain fever" to "the feeble
development of muscles". The system of English education, Raj-
narayan Basu concluded, was "a machine for killing human
beings".10
Curiously the spread of malaria in late nineteenth-century Bengal,
which beyond doubt undermined the health of many people and cut
down the population of some districts, was complained of (if at all) as a
separate matter with, it seems, no bearing on Bengali "effeteness". At
most, when Rajnarayan Basu did list it among causes of physical
degeneration he gave it no special prominence: it was on all fours with
the eating of pulse and fish.11
Other explanations were genetic. Bankim Chandra, who was
sceptical of environmental causes and anyhow reluctant to set a high
value on mere brute strength, blamed Bengalis' perennial lack of
valour on their non-Aryan descent.12 But the most important explana-
tion of Bengali "effeteness" - because it led to action aimed at over-
coming it - was historical and cultural. We may call it a myth of
physical downfall, holding out hope of resurgence.
"Ask anybody and he will tell you that his father and grandfather
were very strong", Rajnarayan Basu said in I873. For a later writer
the days when everyone was strong, athletic, virtually free from
illness, and when "thanks to daily exercise and nourishing food very
many people were long-lived" (a statement that follows close upon an
account of several early deaths among his relatives), were those of his
own boyhood, that is, the 86os, just before Rajnarayan's complaint.
Warnings of physical degeneration sometimes went together with
wider complaints that young people had strayed from long-standing
norms of manners and morals - they had become less happy in their
family lives, had lost the capacity to laugh, or, as the great religious
and nationalist leader Swami Vivekananda was to complain in the
next generation, had "lost their politeness".13
10 National Paper, 22 May, 12 June 1867, I I May 1870; Bagal, op. cit., pp. 102-
12; Rajnarayan Basu, Se kal ar e kal [Yesterday and Today] (Calcutta, 1874), pp. 38-
53; Bengalee, 21 Apr. 1883; Krsnakumar Mitra, Atmacarit [Autobiography] (Cal-
cutta, 1937), p. 8.
11 Rajnarayan Basu, Se kal ar e kal, pp. 38-53.
12 Bankim Chandra, "Bangalir bahubal", in Racanabali, ii, pp. 209-13.
13 Rajnarayan Basu, Se kal ar e kal, pp. 36-53, 76-92; Krsnakumar Mitra, op. cit.,
p. 8; National Paper, I6 Jan. 1867; Vivekananda's speech to Belur M. S. School,
Indian Mirror, I5 Feb. 1901, quoted in Vivekananda in Indian Newspapers, I893-
I902, ed. S. P. Basu and S. B. Ghosh (Calcutta, 1969), p. 215.
The following questions need to be asked. How far did the Bengali
physical education movement differ from other such manifestations of
nationalism? If the self-image of effeteness was in some way peculiar to
Bengal, how far did it reflect reality? How deeply rooted in Hindu
tradition was the movement, and on the other hand how far was it
shaped by the influence of British rulers and British culture? Finally,
why was the movement persistently yet ambiguously involved with
non-respectable or excluded elements such as bandits, low castes and
Muslims?
The Bengali movement was in many ways like other nationalist
revivals of physical culture in Europe, in China, and in India itself.
The deliberate revival of traditional sports or the new emphasis given
them - as with Indian wrestling and lathi-play - can be paralleled
in early nineteenth-century Hungary (horse-races) and also in late
nineteenth-century Ireland (the old sport of hurling). In early nine-
teenth-century Scandinavia and Germany body-building went
together with a cult of ancient heroes, a call to national self-defence,
and a devotion to folk music and folk dance.34
The Bengali elite's sense of degradation and weakness had a good
deal in common with that voiced by Mao Tse-Tung in his pre-Marxist
phase: "Our state", as he wrote in 1917, "is weak. The military condi-
tion is not honoured. The physical condition of our people is
deteriorating from day to day". He denounced the ill effects of exces-
sive study and went on to preach a combination of gymnastic exer-
cises, activism and military spirit. Earlier, about the turn of the
century, the Chinese secret societies that led the Boxer Rebellion com-
bined traditional religious inspiration with puritanical avoidance of
women and other sources of sensual pleasure; the shading-off among
them of physical into supernatural powers, and the charges sometimes
brought against them of disreputable activities such as brigandage,
can - as will be seen- both be found in the Bengali movement. Oi
the other hand the popular tradition of secret societies taken up with
martial arts and physical training seems to have been more plainly an
expression of dissidence than anything at all comparable at popular
level in Bengal, and hence more straightforwardly available to a
nationalist such as the young Mao.3
Among other Indian communities of the late nineteenth and early
So too a leading poet of south India lamented: "we Tamils have lost
our prowess, our heroism; we have no land, no kingdom; we do not
have our own rulers; will the Goddess of Knowledge ... be born
here?".36
A semi-mythical notion of physical downfall and resurgence during
the British period is - to judge from the thin English-language
literature - still held among some Indian (non-Bengali) teachers of
physical education. Resurgence is said to have come about through the
regions and institutions the writer is best acquainted with, for in-
stance, through Maharashtra and Maratha institutions. The writers
who lay particular stress on downfall and resurgence are those who are
committed to indigenous modes of physical culture, as against the
western sports (hockey, football, cricket) that became popular in India
from the 88os onwards.37
For all these resemblances, the Bengali elite still seems peculiar in
its markedly physical sense of collective degradation. In the work of
Iqbal and the other Indian writers quoted, the collective grievance was
subjection, decline from a high estate, enslavement to western culture:
though Iqbal was prepared to deride the brainy but physically flabby
graduate38 there was no hint that entire Indian groups (Tamils, say, or
Muslims) were constitutionally weak. In modern works by non-
Bengali physical educationists the accounts of Indian physical decline
seem perfunctory. Even in the British period a number of elite groups
(leading Muslims, Rajputs, Marathas) could identify themselves with
traditions of imperial or royal rule and of military valour; some were
officially designated by the British as "martial races". The one group
that had to wrestle with a notion of its own constitutional weakness
was the Bengali elite perhaps akin in this, though not in other
ways, to certain groups that have felt themselves victims of a great
catastrophe: Jews before the founding of Israel, and perhaps Highland
Gaels after the Clearances, come to mind.39
It may be said - it is said by some Indians and by some old India
hands in Britain -that the Bengali elite was indeed effete and the
stereotype was justified. If this implies a verdict of moral, spiritual or
cultural "decadence" I am unable to pursue the discussion, finding as
I do the concept of decadence meaningless in historical explanation. If
it implies that the elite's belief in its own physical inferiority was
warranted (along perhaps with some of the material explanations
advanced for it) then the statement can at least be inquired into.
The late nineteenth century, when the self-image of effeteness
established itself, was the heyday of physical anthropology. Its most
authoritative exponent in the Government of India, H. H. Risley,
was confident that Bengalis could be "recognized at a glance"; he
identified them, on the strength of nose measurements, as members of
the "Mongolo-Dravidian type" (somewhat more Dravidian in west
Bengal, more Mongol in east Bengal). But he did not go on to give
scientific warrant for the stereotype of effeteness. At most, Risley's
observation that Indians' height decreased as you went down the
Ganges or towards the south - unimpeachable as a very general rule
turned, in the hands of a popularizer, into the statement that one of
the main characteristics of Bengalis was low stature.40
Even if the physical anthropologists had got further with their work
and whatever one might think of their assumptions - such state-
ments would run into an immovable obstacle. This is the difficulty of
knowing at any time in the nineteenth century who might be meant by
Bengalis. The Muslims of Bengal (a slight majority) were generally
not thought of as Bengalis, by themselves or by others, at least into the
early twentieth century.41 Many of those who complained of Bengali
effeteness clearly had in mind English-educated, mainly high-caste
Hindus; yet Sarala Debi with her talk of railway-porters (who in such
a multilingual province might not even be Bengali-speaking) seemed
to have in mind the population as a whole. The question of fact seems
unanswerable.
As a matter of naive observation, present-day Bengalis (defined, still
39 See Alexander Carmichael (ed.), Carmina Gadelica, 2nd edn., 5 vols. (Edin-
burgh, 1928-41), iii, pp. 328-9, 350-5.
40 H. H. Risley, The People of India (London and Calcutta, 1908), pp. 39-4I;
J. D. Anderson, The Peoples of India (Cambridge, I 9 I 3) p. 28.
41 See Sufia Ahmed, op. cit.; Mohammed Abdul Awwal, "The Prose Works of Mir
Masarraf Hosen, 1869-1 899" (London Univ., S.O.A.S., Ph.D. thesis, 967); Mustafa
Nurul Islam, ''Bengalee Muslim Public Opinion as Reflected in the Vernacular Press
between 1901 and 1930" (London Univ., S.O.A.S., Ph.D. thesis, 1971); Anil Seal,
Emergence of Indian Nationalism, ch. 7.
42 A. G. Siddiqi, Sahid Titumir [The Martyr Titu Mir], 2nd edn. (Dacca, 1968),
quoted in Amalendu De, Bangali buddhijibi o bicchinnatabad [Bengali Intellectuals
and Separatism] (Calcutta, 1974), pp. 98-9; National Paper, 17 Apr., 15 May 1867
and 22 Apr. I868; Birendranath Ghos, Bangalir bahubal, pp. 3-4, 26-9, 31. Abina-
scandra Ghosh was a cousin of Manmathanath Mitra, an early nationalist and an
organizer of the Hindu Mela.
point was not insisted upon, perhaps because many lathiyals were
Muslims, hence, in common parlance, not proper Bengalis. Again,
only incidentally do we discover Eurasian teachers in the akhras set up
or inspired by members of the Hindu Mela group (and intended to
mould a Bengali Hindu "nation"), not to mention a British teacher in
charge of Nabagopal Mitra's own gymnastic school. These might be
explained by the shortage of Bengali Hindu teachers in the early days.
But thirty years later, when Pulin Behari Das set up an akhra in
Dacca to teach Bengalis to defend themselves against insults and
attacks from the British, he employed first a Muslim lathiyal and then
another Muslim who called himself Professor Martaza. A former
circus performer of part-British descent, Martaza had already trained
Sarala Debi's circle of young adepts in lathi- and dagger-play. Other
east Bengal clubs began in the same way with Muslim lathiyals as the
instructors - even though members came to see self-defence against
Muslims as a chief aim of the training.62
What in fact were the relations between different social groups
within the physical education movement? Any analysis must be im-
pressionistic: the evidence is patchy and not always easy to interpret
(Bengali surnames, for instance, do not always indicate caste, let alone
class).
We will start from a figure that seems to have loomed behind
people's thinking about physical culture. This was the big landholder,
somewhere in the interior of Bengal, surrounded by his lathiyals and
other retainers and engaging with them not only in sports and gym-
nastics but in hunting and tiger-taming. Such figures undoubtedly had
existed well before Calcutta intellectuals started worrying over their
own effeteness. A late survival was the maharaja of Muktagachia in
Mymensingh district, who flourished round about 900o: he was a
famous wrestler and both kept and taught wrestlers.63 But, Mukta-
gachia apart, the stories we have of "strong man" landholders
quickly merge into legend. Thus the record of two such landholders in
widely separated parts of Bengal speaks of their having, as young men,
stopped a tiger (or a wild elephant or forest buffalo or runaway horse)
single-handed; both are also said to have put to flight a threatening
gang of bandits.64 We seem to have here approximations to the com-
mon legendary figure of the young prince (typically incognito or in
62National Paper, 24 Apr. 1867, 18 July, 18 Nov. 1868; Bipinbihari Gupta,
Puratan prasanga, pp. 215-I6; Abanindrakrsna Basu, Bangalir sarkus, pp. I-3;
Bhabatos Ray, BiplabiPulin Das, pp. 38-47; Nirad Chaudhuri, Autobiography (1964
edn.), pp. 250-I.
63 Birendranath Ghos, Bangalir bahubal, pp. 141-2; interview with Sri Sama-
rendranath Basu, Oct. I975. The maharaja's name was Jagatkishor Acharya
Chaudhuri.
64 Birendranath Ghos, op. cit., pp. 112-20. The two men are named as
Harachandra Mukhopadhyay of Maluti, near Rampurhat, and Baidyanath
Mazumdar of Bejura, in Mymensingh district. No dates are given.
69 National Paper, 30 Dec. I868; Birendranath Ghos, op. cit., pp. 5, 26-9, 31,
34 ff., 5o-I; Sankari Kinkar Datta, "Atiter smrti katha" [Memories of Bygone Days],
in Simla Byayam Samiti, Subarna jayanti sarbajanin Durgotsab; obituary of Gobar
Babu [Yatirindranath Guha], Byayam-carca, ix no. 2 (Feb. 1972).
70 National Paper, 18 Nov. 1868 and 8, 29 June 1870; Birendranath Ghos, op. cit.,
p. 23.
71 Abanindrakrsna Basu, op. cit., pp. 63-5; Umes Mallik, Yader gaye jor ache,
pp. 79-84; interview with Sri Birendranath Basu, Oct. 1975.
72 Abanindrakrsna Basu, op. cit., pp. 29, 36-9.
73 Haridas Mukherjee and Uma Mukherjee, Origins of the National Education
Movement (Jadavpur, I957), pp. 152-3; Birendranath Ghos, op. cit., pp. 33-4;
Ananta Simha, Agnigarbha Cattagram [Chittagong, Womb of Fire] (Calcutta, 1968),
PP. 4-5.
74 Abanindrakrsna Basu, op. cit., pp. 82-3 (my italics).
Bengal village where two rival landholders, who had quarrelled over
land rights, kept troops of five or six hundred lathiyals apiece. These
men went armed with lathis, swords, shields; they used to catch oppos-
ing lathiyals by their long hair, drag them to the ground, wound them,
take them prisoner, sometimes kill them; there was much bragging
and shouting and one affray left many wounded.79 But men like these
did not just fight off other landholders' retainers. They served to
frighten or, if need be, beat up recalcitrant tenants, to exact the dues
the landholder chose to raise, and generally to impose his authority.80
Such violence was (and is) seldom far from the surface of Bengali as of
much other Indian rural life, though it has not always been carried on
by the same groups.
Educated Bengali nationalists, however, could not (but for a few
awkwardly jocular references in the early days) appeal to this kind of
rural brute force as evidence of national valour. It was exercised on
behalf of themselves or of people like themselves - principal or sub-
ordinate landholders - and it was exercised upon Bengal peasants in
defiance of principles which educated nationalists were coming to
adopt as their own: the rule of law, the equality of all citizens.
So although the redemption of educated Bengalis from the slur of
effeteness meant the calling in as instructors of helpers and servers
lathiyals, door-keepers, low-caste men and Muslims - these men were
not acknowledged as full members of the Bengali society that was
being redeemed. In the myth of physical downfall and resurgence the
educated elite appeared as sole actors. At most, when significant por-
tions of the elite had turned violently against the British in the
terrorist movement, some of the non-respectable helpers and servers
could in retrospect be given a halo of patriotic or Hindu fervour as
legendary great-hearted bandits. But the plague of Bengal was not
effeteness; it was poverty and oppression. This the myth could not
cope with; hence its discontinuities and contradictions. With the
departure of the British and the abolition of landholders' rights,
oppression did not vanish, but its terms shifted. The educated elite no
longer needed to find physical compensation for its inward anxieties,
and physical culture ceased to be the stuff of living nationalist legend.