Comparative Analysis of Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning
Comparative Analysis of Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning
1. Supervised vs. Unsupervised Learning: 3. Early Diabetes Prediction with Deep Neural
1. Researchers have explored both supervised and Networks:
unsupervised machine learning methods. 1. Early detection of diabetes is crucial for
2. Unsupervised methods provide quicker effective treatment.
outputs, while supervised methods offer higher 2. Researchers proposed a model that predicts
performance. diabetes and determines its type.
3. The choice depends on the specific task and 3. Deep neural networks were employed, using
requirements. large datasets (over 1000 records).
4. Achieved 94.02% accuracy with a diabetes
dataset and 99.41% training accuracy with the
Pima Indians diabetes dataset.
1. Hybrid Approach (Fused Machine Learning):
1. Some studies utilize a hybrid approach 4. Hybrid Technique for Diabetic Prediction:
combining different techniques. 1. This methodology combines three
2. Example: In one approach, an initial stage algorithms: Support Vector Machine
involves SVM and a one-layer neural network. (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Convolutional
The output from this stage serves as input for Neural Network (CNN).
a fuzzy model, resulting in accurate predictions. 2. Accuracy was optimized by performing multiple
experiments and averaging the results.
Result and Discussion
Tables 1&2
Comparative Analysis of Diabetes
Tables 3&4
Conclusion
• Datasets Used: Two datasets were used for comparison: the UCI
dataset and the PIMA dataset.
• Results:
• SVM yielded the best results for the UCI dataset.
• DNN was most effective for the PIMA dataset.
• Future Work: Suggests increasing the dataset size for higher accuracy in
complex predictions.
Thanks