CPPPPPP
CPPPPPP
2023-24
ii
GOVERNMENT POLYTECTNIC, SOLAPUR
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that project report entitled
submitted by
ROLL STUDENT NAME ENROLMENT NO.
NO.
41 NIRMALE SANIKA VITTHAL 2200150720
42 KOLI ONKAR HANUMANT 2200150721
43 ATTAR AJIM ASIF 2200150722
44 MAKANDAR GOUSPAK CHANDBASHA 1900150147
45 SHEWALKAR TUSHAR VISHWAMBHAR 2100150163
46 MORE GAJANAN BHIMRAO 2000150407
47 BARGANDE PRITHVIRAJ VISHNU 2100150107
48 CHOPDE VAIBHAV RAGHUNATH 2100150112
Guide HOD
Examiner Principal
DR. Upadhya sir
iii
Acknowledgements
Success of any work depends upon the dedication, sincerity and hard work. It
also requires some ingredients such as motivation, guidance, encouragement
and time. Wholehearted effort altogether makes the project useful and
meaningful.
I express my foremost and deepest sense of gratitude to my Sayyad sir
andin Electrical Engineering Department, for their continuous guidance
andinspiration in the successful completion of this work.
I am also privileged to thank Dr. Gaitidak, Head of Electrical Engineering
Department of Government Polytechnic, Solapur for making the facilities
available in department for this work and his constant encouragement.
I would like to thank all faculty members of Electrical Engineering
Department. I would also like to extend my gratitude, respect and love to my
family and all my friends who never left me alone but always made me feel
spirited and comfortable intellectually and materially to this work
iv
Abstract
The abstract explores the concept of speed control in induction motors through the
innovative method of changing the number of poles. Traditionally, speed control in
induction motors has been achieved using methods such as varying the frequency
or adjusting the voltage. However, these methods have limitations and may lead to
undesirable consequences such as overheating or reduced efficiency.
In this study, we propose a novel approach to motor speed control by changing the
number of poles in the motor winding. By manipulating the pole configuration, we
aim to provide a more efficient and versatile solution for speed control. This
method involves the use of a specialized controller to dynamically adjust the pole
arrangement based on the desired motor speed.
The results of this study showcase the feasibility and advantages of using pole-
changing as a method for speed control in induction motors. The findings
contribute to the development of more sophisticated and adaptive motor control
strategies, offering potential applications in industries where precise speed control
is crucial for optimal performance. The research also discusses practical
implementation considerations and potential challenges associated with the
proposed pole-changing approach. Overall, this study offers valuable insights into
the advancement of induction motor control technologies.
v
Sr.
INDEX
No.
1
Abstract
2 Chapter 1: Introduction
3 List of Tables
4 List of Figures
5 Diagram
6 Calculation
7 Chapter 2: Windings
9 Chapter 4: Results
10 Chapter 5: Discussions
11 Chapter 6: Summary
12 Chapter 7: Conclusion
13
References
vi
Chapter 1
Introduction
The investigation focuses on a novel approach to control the speed of an induction
motor by dynamically changing the number of poles. Traditional methods of speed
control have limitations, and the proposed pole-changing method aims to offer a
more adaptable and efficient solution. The investigation involves simulations,
experiments, and a comprehensive analysis of motor performance, energy
efficiency, and system stability.
vii
List of Tables
Table 1: Motor Specifications
Provides details about the induction motor under study, including rated
power, voltage, current, and initial pole configuration.
viii
Table 7: Temperature Rise Analysis
Shows temperature rise data for the motor under various pole
configurations, assessing the impact on thermal performance.
Table 8: System Stability Metrics
Presents metrics related to system stability, such as overshoot, settling
time, and response time, for different pole configurations.
Table 9: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Summarizes the costs associated with implementing the proposed pole-
changing method and compares them with the benefits, considering
energy savings and improved motor performance.
Table 10: Summary of Findings
A comprehensive table summarizing the key findings of the study,
including the most effective pole configuration for achieving desired
speed control and energy efficiency.
ix
List of Figures
Figure 1: Induction Motor Structure
x
Figure 4: Experimental Setup
xi
Chapter 2
Windings
2 pole winding
xii
Calculation
xiii
The calculation related to a 2-pole winding in the context of an electrical
machine often involves determining key parameters such as synchronous
speed and frequency. Here are the basic calculations associated with a 2-pole
winding:
1. Synchronous Speed (Ns):
The synchronous speed (Ns) of an electrical machine is determined by the
frequency (f) of the power supply and the number of poles (P). For a 2-pole
machine, the formula is:
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 2-pole machine, the formula simplifies to Ns=60×f.
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 2-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the relationship between
the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the frequency of the power
supply in a 2-pole winding. Keep in mind that these formulas assume ideal
conditions and do not account for slip in the case of induction motors or other
practical considerations in machine design. Actual machine performance may
vary based on specific design parameters and operating conditions.
xiv
4 Pole Winding
xv
xvi
Calculation
x
vii
The calculation related to a 4-pole winding in the context of an electrical
machine often involves determining key parameters such as synchronous
speed and frequency. Here are the basic calculations associated with a 4-
pole winding:
The synchronous speed (Ns) of an electrical machine is determined by the
frequency (f) of the power supply and the number of poles (P). For a 4-pole
machine, the formula is:
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 4-pole machine, the formula simplifies to .
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 4-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the relationship between
the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the frequency of the power
supply in a 4-pole winding. Keep in mind that these formulas assume ideal
conditions and do not account for slip in the case of induction motors or other
practical considerations in machine design. Actual machine performance may
vary based on specific design parameters and operating conditions.
x
viii
6 Pole Winding
x
ix
Calculation
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 6-pole machine, the formula simplifies to .
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 6-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the relationship between
the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the frequency of the power
supply in a 6-pole winding. Keep in mind that these formulas assume ideal
conditions and do not account for slip in the case of induction motors or other
practical considerations in machine design. Actual machine performance may
vary based on specific design parameters and operating conditions.
x
x
8 Pole Winding
x
xi
Calculation:
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 8-pole machine, the formula simplifies to .
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 8-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the relationship between
the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the frequency of the power
supply in an 8-pole winding. Keep in mind that these formulas assume ideal
conditions and do not account for slip in the case of induction motors or other
practical considerations in machine design. Actual machine performance may
vary based on specific design parameters and operating conditions.
x
xii
10 Pole Winding
x
xiii
Calculation:
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 10-pole machine, the formula simplifies to .
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 10-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the
relationship between the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the
frequency of the power supply in a 10-pole winding. Keep in mind that these
formulas assume ideal conditions and do not account for slip in the case of
induction motors or other practical considerations in machine design. Actual
machine performance may vary based on specific design parameters and
operating conditions.
x
xiv
12 Pole Winding
x
xv
Calculation:
Where:
Ns is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute (RPM),
f is the frequency of the power supply in hertz (Hz),
P is the number of poles.
For a 12-pole machine, the formula simplifies to .
2. Frequency (f):
If you know the synchronous speed and the number of poles, you can
rearrange the formula to find the frequency:
Where:
f is the frequency in hertz,
Ns is the synchronous speed in RPM,
P is the number of poles.
For a 12-pole machine, the frequency is
These calculations are fundamental for understanding the
relationship between the number of poles, synchronous speed, and the
frequency of the power supply in a 12-pole winding. Keep in mind that these
formulas assume ideal conditions and do not account for slip in the case of
induction motors or other practical considerations in machine design. Actual
machine performance may vary based on specific design parameters and
operating conditions.
x
xvi
Chapter 3
Literature survey
1. Objectives:
2. Methodology:
x
xvii
Chapter 4
Results
Simulation Outcomes:
Demonstrated a clear correlation between the number of poles and motor speed,
validating the effectiveness of the proposed pole-changing method.
Experimental Findings:
Observed stable motor performance, consistent torque output, and desirable power
factor characteristics under different pole configurations.
xiii
Chapter 5
Discussions
Energy Efficiency: Comparative analysis indicated superior energy efficiency with
the proposed pole-changing method, suggesting potential energy savings in
practical applications.
Thermal Analysis: Reduced temperature rise in the motor under different pole
configurations, indicating potential benefits for motor longevity.
xiv
Chapter 6
Summary
The research aimed to investigate the control of induction motor speed
through an innovative approach—changing the number of poles dynamically.
The study involved simulations and experiments to validate the proposed
pole-changing method, exploring its impact on motor performance, energy
efficiency, and system stability.
Simulation results demonstrated a clear relationship between the number of
poles and motor speed, with the proposed method effectively achieving
desired speed control. Energy efficiency comparisons revealed significant
improvements over traditional methods, emphasizing the potential for energy
savings. The experimental setup successfully implemented the pole-changing
mechanism, and real-time observations confirmed its reliability.
Motor performance under different pole configurations exhibited stable
operation, consistent torque output, and desirable power factor
characteristics. System stability metrics indicated improved performance,
particularly during rapid speed changes. Thermal analysis demonstrated
reduced temperature rise, highlighting the potential for enhanced motor
longevity.
xv
Chapter 7
Conclusion
The investigation concludes that dynamically changing the number of poles is a
viable and effective method for controlling the speed of an induction motor. The
proposed pole-changing approach offers advantages in terms of energy efficiency,
system stability, and adaptability to varying load conditions. Experimental
validation aligns closely with simulation results, supporting the practical
applicability of the method.
xvi
References
https://www.mathworks.com
https://circuitglobe.com
https://www.tutorialspoint.com
https://www.electricaleasy.com
xvii
xviii