0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

ENCV4GS - Test 1 - Solution

This document contains a test for a university civil engineering course. It includes two questions regarding the design of a rectangular soil foundation: (1) determining the degree of utilization using EC7 and designing against sliding at the ultimate limit state, and (2) designing against overturning.

Uploaded by

217005052
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

ENCV4GS - Test 1 - Solution

This document contains a test for a university civil engineering course. It includes two questions regarding the design of a rectangular soil foundation: (1) determining the degree of utilization using EC7 and designing against sliding at the ultimate limit state, and (2) designing against overturning.

Uploaded by

217005052
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

University of Kwazulu-Natal

ENCV4GS-H1: Grounds & Structures


DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING-BSC ENGINEERING

TEST 1: 15 March 2024

Test Duration: 1 HOUR Marks: 5


Lecturer/Examiner: Dr Aneke Frank Ikechukwu
INSTRUCTIONS: SOLUTIONS
Ensure to include the correct dimensions and units for all the calculations.
Calculations must be shown in detail to illustrate a clear understanding of the work
procedure.
Question 1

A soil foundation as shown in Figure 1 has a characteristic property as follows: ∅′𝑘 = 360 , 𝛾𝑏 =
20𝑘𝑁/𝑚3 , 𝛾𝑠𝑎𝑡 = 22𝑘𝑁/𝑚3 ; 𝑐𝑘′ = 26𝑘𝑃𝑎 and it is expected that to carry a permanent action of
𝐺𝑘 = 1500 𝑘𝑁, and variable action of 𝑄𝑘 = 1000𝑘𝑁 with a corresponding horizontal variable
action of 𝐻𝐺𝑘 = 250𝑘𝑁.

(Note: use DA 2; 𝛾𝑐 = 25𝑘𝑁/𝑚3 )

a. Design to determine the degree of utilization using EC 7 to stratify the Meyerhof


equation and design against sliding to the ultimate limit state.
[3 marks]

b. Design against overturning.


[2 mark]

1
Fig. 1 Rectangular Footing

Solution

a.

Applying Design Approach 2


- 𝐹𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑆. 𝑊 = 𝑊𝐺𝑘 = 25[1.8 × 2.5 × 0.4] = 45𝑘𝑁 = 𝑊𝐺𝑘
-
𝑉𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝑉𝑑 = 𝛾𝐺 (𝑊𝐺𝑘 + 𝑉𝐺𝑘 ) + 𝛾𝑄 × 𝑉𝑄𝑘 )
𝑉𝑑 = 1.35(45 + 1500) + 1.5 × 1000 = 3586𝑘𝑁

−𝐻𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝐻𝑑 = 𝛾𝐺 (𝐻𝐺𝑘 ) = 1.35(250) = 338𝑘𝑁/𝑚

𝑃 = 1500 + 1000 = 2500𝑘𝑁,

𝑀 450 𝐻 250
𝑒= , 𝑀 = 250 × 1.8 = 450𝑘𝑁𝑚 ∴ 𝑒 = = 0.18𝑚 = ( × 𝑍 = × 1.8) = 0.18𝑚
𝑝 2500 𝑉 2500

𝐵 1.8
𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑘: 𝑒 ≤ = = 0.18 ≤ 0.30 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑‼!
6 6

∴ 𝐵′ = 𝐵 − 2𝑒 = 1.8 − 2(0.26) = 1.28𝑚

𝐴′ = 𝐵′ × 𝐿 = 1.28 × 2.5 = 3.2𝑚2

𝑉𝑑 3586
∴ 𝑞𝑒𝑑 = = = 1121𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝐴′ 3.2

2
𝑢𝑘𝑏 = 9.81(1 − 0) = 9.81𝑘𝑃𝑎

𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑢𝑝𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑡 (𝐹𝑎𝑣): 𝑢𝑑 = 𝛾𝐺𝑓𝑎𝑣 × 𝑢𝑘𝑏 = 1.0 × 9.18 = 9.81𝑘𝑃𝑎


𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒: 𝑞𝑒𝑑 = 𝑞𝑒𝑑 − 𝑢𝑑 = 1121 − 9.81 = 1111𝑘𝑃𝑎

Material properties and resistance

𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑀1, 𝛾𝑐𝑢 (1.0), 𝜸′∅ (1.0), 𝛾𝑐 (1.0)

𝑡𝑎𝑛36
∅′𝑑 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 ( ) = 360
1.0

26
𝑐𝑑′ = ( ) = 26𝑘𝑃𝑎
1.0

20
𝛾𝑑 = ( ) = 20kN/𝑚3
1

[0.5 Marks]

𝑩𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔

𝜑𝑑 36
𝑁𝑞 = 𝑒 𝜋 tan(𝜑𝑑 ) 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 (45 + ) = [𝑒 𝜋 tan(𝜑𝑑 ) 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 (45 + )] = 38
2 2

𝑁𝑐 = [(𝑁𝑞 − 1) × cot (𝜑𝑑 )] = 𝑁𝑐 = [(38 − 1) × cot (36)] = 51

𝑁𝛾 = [(𝑁𝑞 − 1) × tan(1.4𝜑𝑑 )] = [(38 − 1) × tan(1.4 × 36)] = 45

1 + 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑𝑑 1 + 𝑠𝑖𝑛36 𝜑𝑑
𝑘𝑝 = = = 3.9 𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 (450 + )
1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑𝑑 1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛36 2

Shape factors

𝐵′ 1.26
𝑆𝑐 = 1 + 0.2 𝑘𝑝 = [1 + 0.2 ( ) × 3.9] = 1.58
𝐿 1.7

𝐵′ 1.26
𝑆𝑞 = 𝑆𝛾 = 1 + 0.1 𝑘𝑝 = 1 + 0.1 × × 3.9 = 1.29
𝐿 1.7

3
Depth actors

𝐷 0.6
𝑑𝑐 = 1 + 0.2 ′ √𝑘𝑝 = 1 + 0.2 × × √3.9 = 1.19
𝐵 1.26

𝐷 0.6
𝑑𝑞 = 𝑑𝛾 = 1 + 0.1 √ 𝑘 𝑝 = 1 + 0.1 × × √3.9 = 1.09
𝐵′ 1.26

𝑰𝒏𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔

∑𝐻 250
𝛼 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 ( ) = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 ( ) = 70
∑𝑉 2050

2𝛼 2×7
𝑖𝑐 = 𝑖𝑞 = [1 − ] = [1 − ] = 0.92
180 180

7 2
𝑖𝛾 = [1 − ] = 0.67
36

[0.5 Marks]

Bearing resistance

Overburden at foundation base


𝑞 = 𝜎 = 𝛾𝑘 × 𝑑 = 20 × 2 = 40𝑘𝑃𝑎 ∴ 𝜎𝑣𝑘,𝑏 = (𝜎 − 𝑢𝑑 ) = (40 − 9.81) = 30.19𝑘𝑃𝑎

𝛾 ′ = 𝛾𝑠𝑎𝑡 − 𝛾𝑤 = 22 − 9.81 = 12.2𝑘𝑁/𝑚3

Partial factors from set

(𝑅1): 𝛾𝑅𝑣 = (1.4)

𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 = 𝑐𝑑′ 𝑁𝑐 𝑆𝑐 𝑑𝑐 𝑖𝑐 + 𝜎𝑣𝑘,𝑏



𝑁𝑞 𝑆𝑞 𝑑𝑞 𝑖𝑞 + 0.5𝛾𝑘 𝐵′ 𝑁𝛾 𝑆𝛾 𝑑𝛾 𝑖𝛾

𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 = 26 × 51 × 1.58 × 1.19 × 0.92 + 30.19 × 38 × 1.29 × 1.09 × 0.92


+ 0.5 × 20 × 1.28 × 45 × 1.29 × 1.09 × 0.67

𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 = 2294 + 1484.1 + 534 = 4312.1𝑘𝑃𝑎

𝑫𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆

𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 4312.1
𝑞𝑅𝑑 = = = 3080𝑃𝑎
𝛾𝑅𝑣 1.4

𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑘; 𝑞𝐸𝑑 ≤ 𝑞𝑅𝑑 = 1121 ≤ 3080 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒

4
𝑞𝐸𝑑 1121
𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∪ % = = = 0.364 = 36.4% 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
𝑞𝑅𝑑 3080

[0.5 Mark]

Sliding -Drained sliding (Unfavorable under this condition)

𝑢𝑑 = 1.35𝑢𝑘 = 1.35 × 9.81 = 13.24𝑘𝑃𝑎

Vertical action is favorable because it provides resistance against sliding.


𝑉𝐺𝑑 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 = 1.0(25 + 1500) + 0 × 1000 = 1525𝑘𝑁

Horizontal loads are unfavorable under this condition.

Horizontal action

𝐻𝑑 = 𝛾𝐺 (𝐻𝑄 ) = 1.35(250) = 337.5𝑘𝑁/𝑚

Design against sliding

𝐴′ = 𝐵′ × 𝐿 = 1.28 × 2.5 = 3.2𝑚2

𝑡𝑎𝑛𝜑𝑐𝑣,𝑘
𝜑𝑑 = 𝑘𝜑𝑐𝑣,𝑑 = 𝑘𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 ( ) = 360
𝛾∅

𝑉𝐺𝑑 𝑡𝑎𝑛∅𝑑 (𝑉𝐺𝑑 − 𝑢𝐺𝑑 ) (3586 − 0)𝑡𝑎𝑛36


𝜏𝑅𝑑 = = = = 1107𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝛾𝑅𝐻 𝐴′ 𝛾𝑅𝐻 𝐴′ 1.1 × 2.14

[0.5 Mark]

Design shear stress acting across the base of the footing.

∑ 𝐻𝑑 𝛾𝐺 (𝐻𝐺𝑘 + 𝑃𝑎𝐺𝑘 ) + 𝛾𝑄 𝐻𝑄𝑘 1.35(250 + 100) + 1.3(0) 273


𝜏𝑒𝑑 = = = = = 201𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝐴′ 𝛾𝑅𝐻 𝐴′ 2.354 2.14

𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑘‼‼ 𝜏𝑒𝑑 ≤ 𝜏𝑅𝑑 = 201 ≤ 1107𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒

[0.5 Marks]

Passive and active earth pressure action are being ignored because EC7, it states that in
practice these earth pressures are often ignored since 𝑃𝑃.𝐺𝑘 > 𝑃𝑎,𝐺𝑘

[0.5 Marks]
5
Design against overturing

b.

Total overturing moment: 𝑀 = 250 × (1.8) = 450𝑘𝑁𝑚

𝑀 450
𝑒= = = 0.18
𝑃 1500 + 1000

[0.5 Marks]

𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 2.5


𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑓 𝑒 < = = 0.42𝑚
6 6

𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ
∴𝑒< = 0.18 < 0.42, 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑘𝑎𝑦
6

[0.5Mark]

You might also like