10.1515 - Secm 2022 0193
10.1515 - Secm 2022 0193
10.1515 - Secm 2022 0193
Review Article
Jawad Ahmad*, Mohamed Moafak Arbili, Ahmed Farouk Deifalla, Abdeltif Salmi,
Ahmed M. Maglad and Fadi Althoey
Open Access. © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License.
2 Jawad Ahmad et al.
significant component of solid waste, and it is being Research on the hydraulic properties, sensitivity,
examined whether it can be recycled into a variety of and potential use of paper ash waste as cementing ingre-
new goods, particularly in the building and construction dients have been done previously. At temperatures
industry. between 700 and 750°C, research [30] showed that
The pulp and paper companies have long been seen paper waste ash may be transformed into sticky lime
as major users of supplies such as wood and water, as compounds. According to research [31], biochar made
well as of energy in the form of electricity, and significant from chicken litter, rice husk and pulp, and papermill
contributors to environmental pollution releases. The sludge was used as a cement binder, replacing cement
demand for pulp cannot be met locally in many regions up to 1% of the overall volume. The authors demonstrate
of the globe, which has prompted the paper industry to that when contrasted to plain concrete, rice husk bio-
look for non-wood raw sources [25]. Global estimates char, paper mill sludge, and pulp at 0.1% of total
place the annual use of items made from the paper volume are the most suitable binders, with similar ten-
pulp at over 500 million tons [26], or around 58 kg per sile strength values for the paper pulp and papermill
person. It is anticipated that it will contribute between sludge biochar concrete.
2 and 5% of the overall output of paper and pulp, depend- The aim of this study is to advance the modern
ing on the technology used (on a fresh weight basis). Addi- knowledge of the use of paper pulp ash for construction
tionally, a significant volume of wastewater releases up to materials by evaluating the technological, mineral, and
0.1 million tons of contaminants into the environment each physical characteristics of specimens produced utilizing
year [27]. According to research, Nigeria produces an excess various substitute proportions of paper pulp ash and con-
of wasted organic (biodegradable) papers, which calls for necting those characteristics to the physical behaviors
their alternative, economically viable usage in order to and mineral content of the specimens. This study was
reduce environmental deterioration and health risks [28]. conducted to examine current approaches to using waste
The pulp sectors’ present difficulties include producing products (paper pulp) as green additives in concrete and
high-quality pulp at a cheap price while protecting the envir- contrast them with more traditional approaches. Waste-
onment by using progressively less energy, water, and raw based additives provide a long-term solution to the need
materials [25]. The applicability of various binders for mate- for concrete preparation by improving the material’s
rials based on paper pulp composites has been studied. mechanical qualities, bringing down the cost of manu-
Figure 1 illustrates how the paper could have an impact on facturing, and creating long-term waste disposal options.
ecological quality. Additionally, utilizing wastepaper as a The present study examines the chemical characteristics,
substitute for cement has two advantages. The first is main- fresh properties, and hardened properties of concrete
taining environmental quality, and the second is that it may with varied amounts of paper pulp ash, as well as envir-
be used in lieu of cement to produce concrete [29]. onmental issues.
0.62% 0.51%
0.67% 0.01 Silicon dioxide
0.01 12.52% Aluminium oxide
3 Fresh properties 30.5% and that with 15% silica fume (SF) replacement
and 15% metakaolin substitute, it is 37 and 36.37%, respec-
tively. The water consumption is assumed to grow as the
3.1 Consistency
replacement level of admixtures rises [37]. It can be con-
cluded that the cementitious materials increased the
To accomplish the chemical reaction between water and
normal consistency due to their porous nature.
cement, a specific minimum amount of water must be
added to the cement. A chemical process would not be
completed with less water than this amount, reducing
strength, while a chemical reaction with more water 3.2 Setting time
could raise the water–cement ratio, increasing strength.
In order to get optimum strength while employing cement The most crucial factor to consider is the setting time
in construction, the exact proportion of water to cement since if the paste is set quickly, it would be difficult to
must be understood. A test of blended cement pastes’ apply it to concrete. There are several variables that affect
usual consistency was conducted in order to get the correct how quickly pastes are set, including physical and che-
quantity of water. Figure 4 depicts the typical consistency mical characteristics. According to a study [38], the paste’s
of blended pastes incorporating wastepaper ashes. setting time was accelerated by the greater CaO compo-
The consistency of the control pastes or the paste nent. According to a research [39], geopolymer with a high
without wastepaper ash was normal at 29%. In compar- CaO concentration undergoes polymerization and hydra-
ison to the control paste, all the pastes containing was- tion processes, increasing strength and speeding up the
tepaper ash displayed normal consistency. The findings paste’s setting time. Figure 5 provides the setting times for
fell within this typical range of normal consistency of the blended paste including wastepaper ash.
cement paste between 26 and 33%, and the normal con- The typical impact of the paper ash was found to
sistency for blended pastes displays a minor rise as the have prolonged the set periods of blended cement paste.
percentage replacement of paper ash increases in com- C3A reacts with both water and gypsum, which causes the
parison to the control paste. The wastepaper pulp ash- cement to set. However, paper ash contains less C3A than
containing paste requires more water compared to the OPC, hence it sets cement more slowly. Therefore, the
control paste or paste without paper pulp ash due to its blended cement paste’s setting time was delayed by the
porosity [29]. The pastes with replacement up to 10% reduced C3A content. The Ethiopian standard stipulates
showed uniformity inside this region, but the results after that cement must initially set in no less than 45 min and
10% substitution revealed greater levels of consistency must finish setting in no more than 10 h. The findings for the
[35]. Additionally, the research found that when fly ash setting time showed that adding wastepaper ash to the
(FA) proportion rises from 0 to 20%, the usual consis- mixture delayed the setting, but this delay was within
tency rises by roughly 40% [36]. Similar to this, research the parameters provided by the Ethiopian standard [35].
found that the typical consistency of cement (OPC) is However, research finds that in comparison to control
40 400
15%
20%
350
10%
5%
35
15%
0%
300
10%
15%
Time (Minutes)
Consistency (%)
301.2
10%
30
5%
5%
0%
0%
250
20%
25
15%
10%
200
5%
0%
20
150
15 100
Kejela et al. Mitikie et al. Inial Seng Time Final Seng Time
concrete, concrete mixture reduces both the start and final A number of things might have a negative impact on
setting durations [29]. There might be three causes for this. how workable paper pulp concrete is. The major causes of
First, compared to cement, wastepaper pulp ash absorbed the decreased workability of concrete would be the sub-
more water. The hydration process could be sped up by the stitution of paper pulp, paper pulp physical characteris-
high-water absorption of pulp ash particles. As a result, tics, and paper pulp carbon content. As the paper pulp
the period of time required to establish was shortened. percentage rises to roughly 20%, the decrease in water
Second, by increasing the paper pulp ash substitute, the requirement becomes greater [40]. The flow test revealed
mixture’s gypsum content (which is present in the cement) that the flowability of the cement mortars decreased when
decreased. As a result, quick setup times might happen. ash was substituted for 10–30% of the cement [44]. Woody
Third, the significantly increased CaO level in paper pulp ash’s physical properties, such as its irregular particle
ash may further affect the hydration process. shape and higher surface area, make it detrimental to con-
crete’s flowability. Since a larger surface area required
more cement paste for flowability, little workable concrete
was generated. Concrete is becoming less workable as a
consequence of increased internal friction between the
3.3 Slump
materials due to uneven shape and larger surface areas.
In comparison, other research suggests that adding filler
Slump as a function of paper pulp ash is displayed in
materials to small gaps might contribute to a rise in the
Figure 6. The slump decreased when more paper pulp
slump [45,46]. As a consequence of the reduced voids,
content was added. The pulp showed a strong capacity for
there is more cement paste accessible for rheological prop-
absorbing water. As a result, additional water was needed
erties [47]. Paper pulp ash helps to increase the flow of
to obtain a similar slump and there was a greater proportion
concrete by filling up small gaps; however, since it is
of paper pulp in the combination [40]. Similar research
permeable, the flow value of concrete is reduced.
found that adding ash from paper pulp reduced slump
[41]. Research also found that the slump flow decreased
when wheat straw and millet husk ash concentrations
increased. With these behaviors, it may be concluded
4 Strength properties
that the geo-polymerization process caused considerable
amounts of water to be consumed at greater millet husk 4.1 Compressive strength (CS)
ash and wheat straw ash levels due to the microparticle
size of these materials. As a result, the composite has a Compressive strength as a function of paper pulp ash is
tendency to be thicker, which reduces flowability [42]. displayed in Figure 7 and Table 1. Typically, the addition
80
70
5%
5%
0%
0%
60
10%
10%
50
Slump (mm)
15%
15%
40
20%
20%
30
0%
5%
20
10%
15%
10
20%
0
Balwaik et al. Nigar et al. Ahmad et al.
45
5%
40
0%
10%
15%
35
20%
5%
5%
10%
5%
10%
30
0%
0%
0%
25
10%
15%
15%
15%
20%
20
20%
20%
15
10
0
Balwaik et al. Seyyedalipour et al. Praharaj et al. Ahmad et al.
of wastepaper pulp increases the compressive strength by material at higher replacement levels of 20 and 30% of
up to 10%, and subsequent increases in wastepaper pulp the total binder weight, the CS of the 28 days mortar
progressively diminish the strengths [48]. A study also mix was discovered to be lower [50]. The feasibility of
concludes that when the paper pulp content is increased, employing wastepaper pulp ash as an alternative mate-
the compressive strength of wastepaper pulp-based con- rial utilized as a partial cement replacement in the pro-
crete rises until it reaches 10%, after which it steadily duction of concrete was investigated, and its impact on
declines [41]. The findings show that at 5% cement sub- the qualities of concrete was looked at. For 25 MPa con-
stitution with wastepaper sludge ash, the compressive crete, four mixes with varying percentages of waste-
strength increased, beyond that, it started to decline. paper pulp ash in lieu of OPC and paper pulp concrete
When concrete using 0% wastepaper sludge ash in lieu were created: 0, 5, 10, and 15%. When wastepaper pulp
of cement was tested, the maximum compressive strength ash was used instead of cement by 5%, the CS increased
was found to be 15% higher than that of the reference mix compared to the control mix (0%).
at 28 days [43]. It was discovered that the concrete mix with paper
Comparing the 28 days compressive strength of the ash replacements of 10 and 15% had lower compressive
control mix formed with regular Portland cement, an strength than the control mix (0%). This may suggest that
improvement of 5.6 and 1.2% was seen for 5 and 10% wastepaper pulp ash has the ability to replace up to 5% of
substitution. This is because paper ash contains more the weight of OPC. The high replacement of cement by
silica than cement does, which explains why. However, wastepaper pulp ash results in a decrease in cement,
it showed that the amount of cement substitution had a which in turn leads to a reduction in the hydration process,
significant impact on how much the strength had improved. which results in a loss in compressive strength with the
It was noticed that the compressive strength of the concretes rising substitution of wastepaper pulp ash [29]. Wastepaper
containing 15 and 20% wastepaper ash had decreased [35]. contains amorphous silica, which when combined with
The compression strength (CS) of cement mortar mixtures accessible lime (which forms when cement is hydrated)
including FA from biomass-fired power plants was studied. produces additional cementitious compounds such as cal-
Cement was replaced at levels of 10, 20, and 30% of the total cium silicate hydrates. The key factor contributing to the
weight of the binder with FA generated from wood waste. increase in strength is the calcium silicate hydrate, which
Mortar mixes with a 10% wood waste FA additive demon- strengthened the paste’s binding abilities and enhanced
strated higher CS at 28 days but lower flexural strength (FS) the microstructure. However, it showed that the amount
when compared to identical pure OPC mortar. When wood of cement substitution had a significant impact on how
waste FA was employed as a partial cement replacement much the strength had improved. It was noticed that the
Sustainable concrete 7
Ref. Substitution Substitution W/C Optimum Compression strength (MPa) CS at optimum % Remarks
range (%) dose (%)
0%
120.00%
90.00%
60.00%
20% 5%
30.00%
7 - Days
0.00%
28-Days
56-Days
90-Days
CON(28-Days)
15% 10%
compressive strength of the concretes containing 15 and resulting in phase separation of the continuous and scat-
20% wastepaper ash had decreased [35]. Additionally, it tered phases.
has been said that using cementitious materials at the Compressive strength as a function of different paper
proper dosage would enhance efficiency [47]. The greater pulp concentrations and curing durations is shown in
the cementitious material dosage, the lower the strength Figure 8. After a period of 28 days, the standard strength
qualities of the concrete owing to the dilution effect, which was taken as a benchmark (control or reference concrete
causes alkali–silica reactions. Furthermore, when the filler compressive strength). The blend with the optimal
content of the composite grows, the matrix gets thicker, amount of paper pulp, which was determined to be
which strengthens the composite and allows it to bear 5%, served as a reference standard against which other
stress more effectively. However, at greater concentra- mixtures containing varied levels of paper pulp were
tions, the filler is unable to properly mix with the matrix, evaluated.
4
5%
3.5
10%
0%
3
Tensile Strength (MPa)
15%
5%
5%
10%
0%
20%
10%
0%
2.5
5%
0%
10%
15%
15%
15%
20%
20%
2
20%
1.5
0.5
0
Ahmad et al. Nigar et al. Praharaj et al. Balwaik et al.
When paper pulp is used in lieu of cement at a repla- 4.2 Tensile strength
cement rate of 5%, the compressive strength is reduced
by 36% in comparison to the reference strength (28 days Tensile strength as a function of paper pulp ash is dis-
control strength) after 7 days but is reduced by just 3% played in Figure 9 and Table 2. In general, the tensile strength
after 28 days. However, after 56 and 90 days of curing, the increased up to 10% in addition to wastepaper pulp and a
compressive strength is 4% higher than the standard further rise in wastepaper pulp progressively diminishes the
strength with only 5% of the paper pulp ash being strength [48]. In comparison to the reference mix, the mix-
replaced. Additionally, it can also be observed that at ture with a 10% addition of wastepaper had a greater split-
90 days of curing, the compressive strength of concrete ting tensile strength, which decreased as the wastepaper
is almost equal to the reference concrete. This is due to concentration further increased. In comparison to the con-
the fact that the pozzolanic process proceeds at a much trol combination, the splitting tensile strength generally
slower pace than the cement hydration process [52,53]. improved for concrete mixes including 5 and 10% waste-
There is a possibility that pozzolanic materials have a paper but decreased with a 15% addition of wastepaper
reduced early-age strength. Similar studies came to the [55]. Similar research works reported that adding wheat
same result that the addition of pozzolanic compounds to straw ash increased the material’s tensile strength [56].
concrete enhanced the strength of the concrete as it aged The tensile strength of concrete mixes including saw-
(beyond 28 days) [54]. dust ash as a partial replacement for cement was
Ref. Substitution Substitution W/C Optimum % Tensile strength (MPa) Tensile strength at Remarks
range (%) optimum %
16
14
5%
5%
10%
12
10%
0%
0%
Flexural Strength (MPa)
15%
15%
10
20%
20%
8
5%
6
10%
0%
4
10%
15%
5%
7.5%
0%
2.5%
20%
2
0
Azar et al. Balwaik et al. Seyyedalipour et al. Nigar et al.
investigated at 7 and 28 days. A loss in tensile strength was reduced. The process of compaction becomes more
with an increase in saw dust ash percentage, but it challenging at higher doses (20% of wheat straw ash),
was not as clear as a drop in compressive strength. although it is still achievable but for the lack of workability
After 7 days, it was seen that the difference in strength that results in more holes and less structural load cap-
between the blended cement concrete and control mix- ability [59]. The continuous and scattered phases separate
tures increased. After 28 days, blended cement concrete as the filler’s ability to completely mix with the matrix is
mixes with replacement percentages of up to 25% had reduced at greater concentrations. As a consequence, com-
tensile capacity of up to 90% of the control mixtures’ posite materials that include more than 40% paper pulp
strength [57]. lose some of their durability [49].
A researcher examined the impact of hardwood ash
on the tensile capacity of concrete when it was used as a
cement replacement in the production of concrete. 5, 8, 4.3 Flexural strength (FS)
and 12% substitution rate of wooden ash were used. The
same reference concrete was again poured, but without Flexural strength (FS) as a function of paper pulp ash is
any wood ash, for comparison. The tensile strength of the displayed in Figure 10 and Table 3. In general, the was-
constructed concrete samples was evaluated after 3, 7, 28, tepaper pulp may boost FS by up to 10%, and subsequent
91, 182, and 365 days. From the study of the laboratory increases in wastepaper pulp progressively diminish the
data, it was determined that the tensile capacity of the strengths [48]. The research found that adding 10 and
control concrete was 3.8 MPa at 28 days and 4.3 MPa 15% more wastepaper to concrete decreased its FS, how-
after 365 days. The tensile capacity of concrete mixes ever adding 5% more wastepaper to concrete increased
including wood ash ranged from 3.6–4.0 MPa at 28 days its FS compared to the control combination [60]. The
to 4.3–5.3 MPa at 365 days. The concrete with wood ash of result showed that high paper pulp levels in concrete
8% was also found to have the best tensile strength devel- mixes reduced FS. The FS of the concrete mixture dropped
opment behavior for concrete ages of more than 28 days up as the paper pulp percentage increased. The paper pulp
to 365 days, with a magnitude of tensile capacity that con- content in the concrete mixture had a major effect on the
sistently beat that of other test mixes [58]. The greatest mechanical characteristics of the mixture. The results
value was discovered at a dosage of 10% wheat straw showed that, usually, the flexural strength increased with
ash when comparing the tensile strength of wheat straw additions of the wastepaper pulp of 5 and 10%, and that a
ash with that of the reference sample. However, when the further rise in wastepaper pulp progressively decreased the
dosage was raised by more than 10%, the tensile strength strength [48].
Sustainable concrete 11
The adhesion connection between water molecules was responsible for the reduction in the strength qualities
and the structure of the paper may be used to explain of the concrete as a result of the increased dosage of cemen-
these findings. Adhesion, which may be advantageous titious materials. In addition to this, raising the filler per-
to water, is the attraction of one molecule to another centage in a composite material causes the matrix to grow
molecule of a different particle type. Paper ash has denser over time, which in turn makes the composite mate-
more silica than cement. When the accessible lime and rial more robust and better able to resist the effects of stress.
crystalline silica in wastepaper combine to generate cement, However, when the filler is present in a larger concentra-
new cementitious compounds like calcium silicate hydrates tion, it is no longer able to combine completely with the
are produced. The key factor contributing to the increase in matrix, which results in the phase separation of the contin-
strength is the calcium silicate hydrate, which strengthened uous phase and the scattered phase. In light of the findings
the paste’s binding abilities and enhanced the micro- presented above, the review suggests using 10% ash from
structure [61–64]. However, it showed that the amount the paper pulp in concrete without causing any harmful
of cement substitution had a significant impact on how effects on the strength attributes of the concrete.
much the strength had improved. It was noticed that the
compressive strength of the concretes containing 15
and 20% wastepaper ash had decreased [35]. It has also
4.4 Impact strength
been noted that the right optimal dosage of cementitious
materials is critical for improved performance [47,65–67].
The capacity of concrete to endure repeated impacts and
The dilution effect, which causes alkali–silica reactions,
absorb energy without suffering damage in the form of
12 Jawad Ahmad et al.
cracking or spalling is termed impact resistance. The this, the review finds that adding paper pulp increases
impact resistance as a function of paper pulp ash is dis- impact resistance. This is due to the paper pulp’s dual
played in Figure 11. roles as a filler and a strengthening fiber, which strengthens
The addition of paper pulp results in a increased in the matrix phase and enhances all structural qualities,
the impact value. This is due to the fact that the paper especially impact strength.
pulp serves both as a filler and a reinforcing fiber. Studies
reported that fiber improved concrete performance due to
bridging effects [68,69]. This provides the matrix phase
with a strengthening effect, which in turn improves all 5 Cost benefits
of the mechanical characteristics, including the impact
strength. Thus, when a force is applied, composite mate- Figure 12 shows the cost reduction of the mix with partial
rials do not readily fracture. The filler particles, however, substitution of wastepaper with respect to the reference
become concentrated in one area as the filler concentra- mix. The optimal proportion of wastepaper was selected
tion rises and are unable to properly mix with the matrix for comparison. Since wastepaper pulp ash is a bypro-
phase. This agglomeration causes phase separation, duct, the cost is minimal. The cost comparison shows that
which progressively degrades the mechanical character- adding wastepaper pulp ash lowers the price of concrete.
istics above a composition of 40%. As long as the Thus, it has been determined that using wastepaper in
amount of paper pulp is raised, this degradation will concrete may, to some degree, reduce disposal costs and
continue [49]. According to research, activated FA con- generate greener concrete for building. Finally, it was dis-
crete has superior impact resistance than other mixtures covered that, when compared to control concrete, the con-
at replacement levels of 10 and 15%. Due to the pozzo- crete mix with 5% partial replacement of wastepaper pulp
lanic effect, higher impact resistance obtained in con- ash for cement lowers the cost of concrete by 2.34% while
crete with 10 and 15% FA replacement may be related to maintaining concrete properties like consistency, work-
decreased permeability [70]. The concrete mixes’ fine ability, compressive strength, absorption, and resistance
aggregates were replaced in part by 0, 20, 40, and to 2% sulfuric acid solution [29]. The research was con-
60% rubber by volume, while the cement was substi- ducted on the economics of bacterial SF concrete [73].
tuted with 0, 5, and 10% SF by mass. Findings show The benefit/cost ratio of SF concrete decreased as the
that the impact energy of rubberized concrete was 2.39 SF amount increased. In contrast to the reference blend,
times more than that of regular concrete and that its SF concrete with 10% SF displayed the greatest advantage
ability to absorb energy was 9.46% greater. Although SF in terms of property improvement and the highest benefit/
was added, the impact energy increased by 3.06 times, but cost ratio. According to one research, using pozzolanic
the energy absorption capacity remained relatively the elements in concrete may increase concrete durability,
same [71]. According to research, SF was added to natural setting time, and cause fewer energy releases, and costs
pozzolan-based cement concrete to make up for the linked with structural preservation and restoration
early-life compressive strength drop [72]. In spite of throughout the structure’s planned service life. Furthermore,
85
80 1460 7
Impact Strength (MPa)
1440
6
75 1420
Cost Reducon (%)
5
Total Cost (BIrr)
1400
4
70 1380
3
1360
65 2
1340
1320 1
60
1300 0
10 20 30 40 50
0 5 10 15
Paper pulp (%) Paper Pulp Ash (%)
Figure 11: Impact strength [49]. Figure 12: Cost benefits of paper pulp in concrete [29].
Sustainable concrete 13
even at the greatest distance FA can be delivered for cement in construction. The first advantage is that it helps
concrete, including FA to provide ecological and finan- maintain the quality of the surrounding environment, and
cial advantages over concrete without the presence of the second is that it may be utilized in the manufacturing
FA [74]. of concrete as an alternative to cement. According to the
findings of the research, there are two positive aspects
associated with using recycled paper in place of cement.
6 Environmental benefits The first advantage is that it helps to preserve the quality of
the environment, and the second is that it may be substi-
Due to the significant consumption of resources by never tuted for cement in the production of concrete [29]. In
ending building projects, environmental consequences addition, the manufacture of cement is a contributor to
from the cement and concrete industry have raised con- environmental degradation since it results in the release
cerns around the globe [75–78]. The removal of raw mate- of hazardous gases.
rials to the dismantling of a concrete structure is only a
few of the many steps in the process of building with
concrete that pose significant sustainability challenges
[79–82]. Recycling leftover concrete from construction 7 Conclusion
and demolition debris (waste), rerouting the life cycles
of essential components, and lowering the amount of This article provides overview of green construction ideas
solid trash disposed are all becoming more important that deal with making the most of resources that are often
as the world transitions to a more sustainable lifestyle wasted (paper pulp ash). The majority of the attention
[83]. Diverse waste types are becoming more often gen- was placed on how they influenced the qualities of the
erated in a range of quantities and standards. In order to construction material, the appropriate composition of the
preserve and safeguard human health in metropolitan mixture, and a discussion of the benefits and drawbacks
populations and to boost systematic productive capacity of the “green” addition (paper pulp ash). The focus of this
at all levels of waste disposal, it has become vital to use study is on concrete’s essential properties, which include
modern solid sustainability practices to build successful consistency, setting time, flowability, compressive, flexural,
strategies for collection, transportation, and processing tensile, and impact strengths. In addition, the benefits of
technologies [20]. employing paper pulp ash as construction materials are
The incineration of discarded paper affects the sur- examined from both an economic and ecological stand-
rounding environment since it results in the emission of point. The comprehensive findings are provided below.
air pollutants into the atmosphere. When burned, printed • The normal consistency of concrete raised slightly with
paper releases a much greater quantity of air pollutants the incorporation of paper pulp ash due to the porous
than unprinted paper does. This may be the result of the nature of paper pulp which required more water to
printing ink releasing additional pollutants into the air, obtain normal consistency.
such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides. In addition, • An increase in setting time was observed with the sub-
heavy elements including lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) stitution of paper pulp ash. It is due to the larger quan-
were discovered on the ash of burnt papers, which sug- tity of CaO present in paper pulp ash, which accelerated
gested that the ash may be combined with the soil. Heavy the setting of paste.
metals such as lead, and cadmium are examples of hazar- • The flowability of concrete declined with the incorpora-
dous heavy metals that may have an adverse impact on tion of paper pulp ash due to its strong capacity for
human health. They have a negative impact on the central absorbing water. Therefore, additional water was needed
and peripheral neurological systems, as well as the kid- to obtain a similar slump.
neys, and they contribute to the inhibition of production • The strength properties of concrete such as compres-
of hemoglobin. Pb also has an impact on the kidneys. Cd sive, flexural, tensile, and impact strengths increased
has a deleterious effect on several essential enzymes and with the incorporation of paper pulp ash. The increase
has also been linked to osteocalcin, a painful bone condi- in strength properties is mainly due to micro-filling voids of
tion, and found to cause harm to the kidneys. Cadmium paper pulp ash. Furthermore, the optimum amount is valu-
pneumonitis is caused by the inhalation of cadmium oxide able as the greater dose negatively impacts the strength
dust and fumes, and its symptoms include pulmonary properties due to a lack of flowability. Therefore, the review
necrosis of the pulmonary epithelium. In addition, two recommends to a used optimum dose of paper pulp ash.
more advantages come with using recycled paper for The typical optimum dose of paper pulp varies from 5 to
14 Jawad Ahmad et al.
10% depending on the mix design, chemical composition, [2] Kurad R, Silvestre JD, de Brito J, Ahmed H. Effect of incor-
and particle size. poration of high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and
• The cost–benefit study reveals that the concrete mix fly ash on the strength and global warming potential of con-
crete. J Clean Prod. 2017 Nov;166:485–502. https://
with 5% of wastepaper pulp ash as cement lowers the
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095965261731692X.
cost of concrete by 2.34% while maintaining equal con- [3] Kou SC, Poon CS. Properties of self-compacting concrete pre-
sistency, workability, and strength qualities as com- pared with coarse and fine recycled concrete aggregates. Cem
pared to reference blends. Concr Compos. 2009 Oct;31(9):622–7. https://linkinghub.
elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0958946509001061.
[4] Singh Shekhawat B, Aggarwal V. Utilisation of waste glass
powder in concrete-A literature review. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng
Technol (An ISO). 2007;3297(7):2319–8753.
8 Recommendations [5] Anwar A. The influence of waste glass powder as a pozzolanic
material in concrete. Int J Civ Eng Technol. 2016;7(6):131–48.
Although paper pulp ash may be used in concrete to a [6] Nelson J, Grayson D. World business council for sustainable
development (WBCSD). In: Corporate responsibility coalitions.
certain level (5–10%), a more thorough investigation is
Routledge; 2017. p. 300–17. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/
required before it can be used practically.
books/9781351277518/chapters/10.4324/9781351277525-29.
• The normal consistency and flow of the concrete [7] Muñoz P, Morales MP, Letelier V, Mendivil MA. Fired clay
decreased with paper pulp due to the porous nature bricks made by adding wastes: Assessment of the impact on
of paper pulp ash which adversely affects the concrete physical, mechanical and thermal properties. Constr Build
performance. Therefore, the review recommends a detailed Mater. 2016;125:241–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
conbuildmat.2016.08.024
study of the different treatments of paper pulp ash to be
[8] Du H, Tan KH. Concrete with recycled glass as fine aggregates.
used in concrete to avoid its unfavorable effects (water ACI Mater J. 2014;111(1):47–57. http://www.concrete.org/
absorption). Publications/ACIMaterialsJournal/ACIJournalSearch.aspx?m=
• Many researchers claim that particle size significantly details&ID=51686446.
influences the strength properties. Therefore, the review [9] Qi B, Xu P, Wu C. Analysis of the infiltration and water storage
recommends a detailed study on the particle size effect performance of recycled brick mix aggregates in Sponge City
construction. Water. 2023;15(2):363.
of paper pulp ash on concrete properties.
[10] Qi B, Gao S, Xu P. The application of rubber aggregate-com-
• There is no information about concrete incorporating bined permeable concrete mixture in Sponge City construc-
paper pulp ash in a aggressive environment. Therefore, tion. Coatings. 2023;13(1):87.
more study in this area is needed. [11] Ferrándiz-Mas V, Bond T, García-Alcocel E, Cheeseman CR.
• To improve the ductility of paper pulp ash concrete, the Lightweight mortars containing expanded polystyrene and
paper sludge ash. Constr Build Mater. 2014;61:285–92.
review also recommended the addition of fiber to obtain
[12] Naik TR, Moriconi G. Environmental-friendly durable concrete
high-strength ductile durable concrete. made with recycled materials for sustainable concrete con-
struction. In: International Symposium on Sustainable
Development of Cement, Concrete and Concrete Structures,
Funding information: This study is supported via funding Toronto, Ontario; October 2005.
from Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University project number [13] Islam GMS, Rahman MH, Kazi N. Waste glass powder as partial
replacement of cement for sustainable concrete practice. Int J
(PSAU/2023/R/1444) and Deanship of Scientific Research at
Sustain Built Env. 2017 Jun;6(1):37–44. https://linkinghub.
Najran University under the Research Groups Funding pro- elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212609016301157.
gram grant code (NU/RG/SERC/12/13). [14] Luhar S, Cheng T-W, Nicolaides D, Luhar I, Panias D, Sakkas K.
Valorisation of glass wastes for the development of geopo-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no lymer composites – Durability, thermal and microstructural
properties: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2019
conflict of interest.
Oct;222:673–87. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/
pii/S0950061819316009.
Informed consent statements: Not applicable. [15] Pathariya SC, Rana JK, Shah PA, Mehta JG, Patel AN.
Application of waste foundry sand for evolution of low-cost
concrete. Int J Eng Trends Technol. 2013;4:4281–6.
[16] Rashad AM. Recycled waste glass as fine aggregate replace-
References ment in cementitious materials based on Portland cement.
Constr Build Mater. 2014 Dec;72:340–57. https://linkinghub.
[1] Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A. Global strate- elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061814010046.
gies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. [17] Cyr M, Idir R, Poinot T. Properties of inorganic polymer (geo-
J Clean Prod. 2013;51:142–61. polymer) mortars made of glass cullet. J Mater Sci. 2012 Mar
Sustainable concrete 15
[81] Hansen TC. Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry. 2005 Jan;25(2):197–201. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/
Routledge: CRC Press; 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/ retrieve/pii/S0956053X05000139.
9780203626450. [83] Turk J, Cotič Z, Mladenovič A, Šajna A. Environmental evalua-
[82] Corinaldesi V, Gnappi G, Moriconi G, Montenero A. Reuse of tion of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means
ground waste glass as aggregate for mortars. Waste Manag. of LCA. Waste Manag. 2015;45:194–205.