RTO Vs RPO
RTO Vs RPO
RTO Vs RPO
A
business continuity plan (BCP) is a
document that outlines how a business will
continue operating during an unplanned
disruption in service.
RTO definition: The amount of time after a disaster in which business operations need to be
resumed and resources need to be available for use.
RPO definition: The amount of data loss that would be acceptable for an organization as a
consequence of a disaster.
The meaning of RPO is also given by ISO 22301: The definition of the Recovery Point
Objective, or RPO, is the amount of data a business can afford to lose in terms of time, or in
terms of amount of information.
As an example, think about a database for recording all transactions in a bank (e.g.,
payments, transfers, scheduling, etc.). Usually, in such a case RPO is zero, because even in
just a few minutes, hundreds of transactions can be made, and this information cannot be
lost and cannot be easily recovered in any other way.
Now think about a source code repository where software developers keep their work. It is
relatively easy to rewrite one day of lost coding for a software developer, but more than that
can be difficult or impossible to recreate. In this case, the RPO would be 24 hours, which
means that the backup needs to be done at least every 24 hours.
The point is, the harder it is to recover or recreate the data, the shorter the RPO needs to be.
Another relevant difference is that, in relation to the moment of the disruptive incident, RTO
looks forward in time (i.e., the amount of time you need to resume operations), while RPO
looks back (i.e., the amount of time or data you are willing to lose).
What are RTO and RPO in disaster recovery and business
continuity?
RTO is used to determine what kind of preparations are necessary for a disaster, in terms of
money, facilities, telecommunications, automated systems, personnel, etc. The shorter the
RTO, the greater the resources required.
RPO is used for determining the frequency of data backup to recover the needed data in
case of a disaster. If your RPO is four hours, then you need to perform backup at least every
four hours; every 24 hours would put you in big danger, but if you did it every hour, it might
cost you too much and not bring additional value to the business.
Both Recovery Time Objective and Recovery Point Objective are related to business
continuity by means of the business impact analysis (BIA), where they are determined, and
the business continuity strategy, where preparations for achieving them are defined.
See these articles to learn more about RTO, RPO, and BIA: Five Tips for Successful
Business Impact Analysis, and Backup policy – How to determine backup frequency.
RTO and RPO – are they related?
Although RTO and RPO are both crucial for business impact analysis and for business
continuity management, they are not directly related, and neither conflict with each other
(one deals with time and the other with an amount of data), so it does not make sense to
talk about RPO vs. RTO.
Should RPO be less than RTO?
Since RTO and RPO are not directly related, RPO does not need to be less than RTO or vice-
versa – you could have an RTO of 24 hours and an RPO of one hour, or an RTO of two hours
and an RPO of 12 hours.
For example, an e-commerce site may need to be online 4 hours after a disruption, so RTO
is four hours. Now, this same e-commerce site has two databases, one for its product
catalog, which is updated once a week, and the second to record sales (thousands per day).
The RPO for the first database can be one week, but for the second, the RPO should be near
zero.
To achieve this balance, RPO and RTO are paramount. Without determining them properly,
you would just be guessing – and guessing is the best way to ensure recovery disaster,
instead of recovery from a disaster.