Control Lab
Control Lab
LABORATORY MANUAL
Semester: VI
Lab Incharge:
Prof. O. B. Heddurshetti
Lab Instructor:
Shri. R. S. Bardol
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
VISION
“To be the centre of excellence in teaching and learning to produce the competent &
socially responsible professionals in the domain of Electrical & Electronics Engineering.”
MISSION
I. To educate students with core knowledge of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering to excel in their professional career.
II. To develop problem solving skills, professional skills and ethical values among
the students for the betterment of mankind.
III. To prepare technically competent and socially responsible Electrical Engineer to
serve the future needs of the society.
PSO2: Use software/hardware tools for the design, simulation and analysis of
Electrical and Electronics Systems.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
1 Experiment to draw the speed torque characteristics of (i) AC servo motor (ii) DC servo motor
2 Experiment to draw synchro pair characteristics
3 Experiment to determine frequency response of a second order system
4 (a) To design a passive RC lead compensating network for the given specifications, viz, the
maximum phase lead and the frequency at which it occurs and to obtain the frequency response.
5 (a) To design a passive RC lag compensating network for the given specifications, viz, the
maximum phase lag and the frequency at which it occurs and to obtain the frequency response.
(b) To determine experimentally the transfer function of the lag compensating network
6 Experiment to draw the frequency response characteristics of the lag – lead compensator
network and determination of its transfer function.
7 To study a second order system and verify the effect of (a) P, (b) PI, (c) PD and (d) PID
controller on the step response.
8 (a) To simulate a typical second order system and determine step response and evaluate time
response specifications.
(b)To evaluate the effect of adding poles and zeros on time response of second order system.
(c) To evaluate the effect of pole location on stability.
9 (a) To simulate a D.C. Position control system and obtain its step response.
(b) To verify the effect of input waveform, loop gain and system type on steady state errors.
(c) To perform trade-off study for lead compensator.
(d) To design PI controller and study its effect on steady state error.
10 (a) To examine the relationship between open-loop frequency response and stability,
open-loop frequency and closed loop transient response.
(b) To study the effect of open loop gain on transient response of closed loop system using root
locus.
11 (a) To study the effect of open loop poles and zeros on root locus contour.
(b) Comparative study of Bode, Nyquist and root locus with respect to stability.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Understanding of servo motor.
Understanding of speed-torque variation for different rated voltages.
3. AIM:
a) Experiment to draw the speed – torque characteristic of a two - phase A.C. servomotor.
S. No Apparatus Qty
1 AC Servo motor unit 01No
2 Digital Multimeter 01No
5 Connecting wires Few
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
The motors that are used in automatic control systems are called servo-motors. The
servomotors are used to convert an electrical signal applied them into an angular displacement of shaft.
Depending on the supply required to run the motor, they are broadly classified as DC servo motor and
AC servomotors. But, the DC servomotors are expensive than AC servomotors. But, the DC servo
motors have linear characteristics and so it is easier to control DC motors are capable of delivering over
3 times their rated torque for a short time but AC motors will short at 2 to 2.5 times their rated torque.
In DC servomotors mainly 2 types of motors are classified 1. Permanent magnetic motors and
electromagnetic field motors. The DC servo motors are generally used for large power applications
such as in machine tools and robotics.
The servomotors used in industry today are used in a closed-loop servo system. To understand
how the servomotor is used in the system, it is first necessary to review the entire system. The
following figure indicates a block diagram of a typical servo system.
A reference input (typically called a velocity input) is sent to the servo amplifier, which
controls the speed of the servomotor. Directly mounted to the machine (or to the servomotor) is a
feedback device (either an encoder or resolver). This device changes mechanical motion into
electrical signals and is used as a feedback loop. This feedback loop is then sent to the error detector,
which compares the actual operation with that of the reference input. If there is an error, that error is
fed directly to the amplifier, which makes the necessary corrections.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
In many servo systems, both velocity and position are monitored. (Note: In servo systems, the
word "velocity" is often used to describe speed control. Velocity indicates a rate of change of position,
with respect to time. It also indicates a rate of motion in a particular direction, with respect to time.)
The velocity loop control may take its command from the velocity loop feedback device-a resolver or
tachometer mounted directly to the motor.
These AC servo motors are basically two-phase, reversible, induction motors modified for
servo operation. Ac servo motors are used in applications requiring rapid and accurate response
characteristics. To achieve these characteristics, these ac servo motors have small diameter, high
resistance rotors. The ac servo motor's small diameter provides low inertia for fast starts, stops, and
reversals. High resistance provides nearly linear speed-torque characteristics for accurate servo motor
control.
An induction motor designed for servo use is wound with two phases physically at right angles
or in space quadrature. A fixed or reference winding is excited by a fixed voltage source, while the
control winding is excited by an adjustable or variable control voltage, usually from a servo-amplifier.
The servo motor windings are often designed with the same voltage/turns ratio, so that power inputs at
maximum fixed phase excitation, and at maximum control phase signal, are in balance.
The inherent damping of servo motors decreases as ratings increase and the servo motors are
designed to have a reasonable efficiency at the sacrifice of speed-torque linearity.
Induction type servo motors are available in fractional and integral horsepower sizes.
9. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
P × 60
T= --------------------- = _________gm cm
2ΠN
13. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
The motors that are used in automatic control systems are called servo-motors. The
servomotors are used to convert an electrical signal applied them into an angular displacement of shaft.
Depending on the supply required to run the motor, they are broadly classified as DC servo motor and
AC servomotors. But, the DC servo-motors are expensive than AC servomotors. But, the DC servo
motors have linear characteristics and so it is easier to control DC motors are capable of delivering over
3 times their rated torque for a short time but AC motors will short at 2 to 2.5 times their rated torque.
In DC servomotors mainly 2 types of motors are classified 1. Permanent magnetic motors and
electromagnetic field motors.
The DC servo motors are generally used for large power applications such as in machine tools and
robotics.
A servomotor is a motor which forms part of a servomechanism. The servomotor is paired with some
type of encoder to provide position/speed feedback. A stepper motor is one type of servomotor. A
stepper motor is actually built to move angular positions based upon each possible step around the
entire rotation, and may include micro steps with a resolution such as 256 micro steps per step of the
stepper motor. A servomechanism may or may not use a servomotor. For example, a household furnace
controlled by a thermostat is a servomechanism, because of the feedback and resulting error signal, yet
there is no motor being controlled directly by the servomechanism
A servomechanism, sometimes shortened to servo, is an automatic device that uses error-sensing
negative feedback to correct the performance of a mechanism.
DC servo motors are normally used as prime movers in computers, numerically controlled
machinery, or other applications where starts and stops are made quickly and accurately. Servo motors
have lightweight, low-inertia armatures that respond quickly to excitation-voltage changes. In addition,
very low armature inductance in these servo motors results in a low electrical time constant (typically
0.05 to 1.5 msec) that further sharpens servo motor response to command signals. Servo motors include
permanent-magnetic, printed-circuit, and moving-coil (or shell) dc servo motors. The rotor of a shell dc
servo motor consists of a cylindrical shell of copper or aluminum wire coils which rotate in a magnetic
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
field in the annular space between magnetic pole pieces and a stationary iron core. The servo motor
features a field, which is provided by cast AlNiCo magnets whose magnetic axis is radial. Servo motors
usually have two, four, or six poles.
Dc servo motor characteristics include inertia, physical shape, costs, shaft resonance, shaft
configuration, speed, and weight. Although these dc servo motors have similar torque ratings, their
physical and electrical constants vary.
DC Servo Motor Selection: The first selection approach is to choose a servo motor large enough for a
machine that has already been designed; the second is to select the best available servo motor with a
specific feature and then build the system around it; and the third is to study servo motor performance
and system requirements and mate the two.
The final servo motor system design is usually the least sophisticated that meets the performance
specifications reliably. Servo motor requirements may include control of acceleration, velocity, and
position to very close tolerances. This says that the servo designer must define the system carefully,
establish the servo motor's performance specifications, determine critical areas, and set up tolerances.
Only then will the designer be able to propose an adequate servo-system and choose a servo motor type.
9. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
Circumference
r = -----------------------------
2Π
13. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Understanding of synchro
Understanding of synchro-transmitter
Understanding of synchro-transmitter-receiver
Understanding of importance of synchros
3. AIM:
To study the characteristics of synchros as transmitter and synchro transmitter- receiver
pair.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
Definition: A synchros on electromagnetic transducer commonly used convert an angular position of a
shaft into an electric signal.
Study of Synchro Transmitter and receiver:-
In this part or experiment we can see that because or the transformer action the angular position
of rotor is transformed into a unique set of stator voltages.
Synchro Transmitter:
A synchro that provides voltages related to the angular position of its rotor; when its two input
leads are excited by an alternating-current voltage, the magnitudes and polarities of the voltages at the
three output leads define the rotor position. Also known as selsyn generator; selsyn transmitter; synchro
generator; transmitter; transmitter synchro.
Synchro Receiver:
A synchro that provides an angular position related to the applied angle-defining voltages; when two of
its input leads are excited by an alternating-current voltage and the other three input leads are excited by
the angle-defining voltages, the rotor rotates to the corresponding angular position; the torque of
rotation is proportional to the sine of the difference between the mechanical and electrical angles. Also
known as receiver synchro; selsyn motor; selsyn receiver; synchro motor.
4) Observe the position across to rotate of the receiver. If it is not zero the rotor, so as to obtain zero
voltage and this value is referred to as electrical zero position of the receiver.
5) Holding firm by position of rotor shaft at transmitters slightly. Note down the voltage across the
rotor of the receiver.
6) Now continue the readings up to 360 , in steps of 30 by increasing the angular positions of the
transmitter in steps.
7) Take rotor shaft position of transmitters on X- axis and voltage on Y axis and draw a graph.
8) Draw graph by taking transmitter angular position on X- axis and receiver angular position on Y
axis.
CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
9. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
12. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Understanding of frequency domain specifications.
3. AIM:
To determine experimentally the frequency response of a second -order system and evaluation of
frequency domain specifications.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
All the examples presented in this tutorial are modeled by linear constant coefficient
differential equations and are thus linear time-invariant (LTI). LTI systems have the extremely
important property that if the input to the system is sinusoidal, then the steady-state output will also
be sinusoidal at the same frequency but in general with different magnitude and phase. These
magnitude and phase differences as a function of frequency comprise the frequency response of the
system.
The frequency response of a system can be found from the transfer function in the following
way: create a vector of frequencies (varying between zero or "DC" to infinity) and compute the
value of the plant transfer function at those frequencies. If is the open-loop transfer function of a
system and is the frequency vector, we then plot . Since is a complex number, we can plot both its
magnitude and phase (the Bode Plot) or its position in the complex plane (the Nyquist Diagram).
Both methods display the same information in different ways.
Second order systems are commonly encountered in practice, and are the simplest type of
dynamic system to exhibit oscillations. In fact many real higher order systems are modeled as second
order to facilitate analysis. Examples include mass-spring-damper systems and RLC circuits.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
9. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
We get
ωn=
ξ= (R/2)*√(C/L)
ξ=
13. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
To identify maximum phase lead.
To understand compensating network.
To understand frequency response.
3. AIM:
(a) To design a passive RC lead compensating network for the given specifications, viz., the
maximum phase lead and the frequency at which it occurs and to obtain its frequency response.
(b) To determine experimentally the transfer function of the lead compensating network.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
Consider a lead compensator having the following transfer function
Kcα [(Ts+1)/(αTs+1)]=Kc[s+(1/T)] / [s+(1/αT)] where (0<α<1)
It has zero at s=-(1/T) and a pole at s=-(1/αT). Since 0<α<1, we see that the zero is always
located to the right of the pole in the complex plane. Note that for a small value of α the pole is
located far to the left. The maximum value of α is limited by the physical construction of the
lead compensator. The minimum value of α is usually taken to be about 0.05 (this means that
the maximum phase lead that may be produced by a lead compensator is about 65 degrees).
The primary function of the lead compensator is to reshape the frequency response curve to
provide sufficient phase lead angle to offset the excessive phase lag associated with the
components of the fixed system.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
9. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
1-sin Фm
α = _________
1+sin Фm
therefore α = __________
T=1/(2 Π fn √ α) Sec.
T= __________µS
Let C = ______µF
R1=T/C= ________Ω
R2= αR1/(1-α)=__________=__________Ω
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
13. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
num=[0 1 1986];
den=[1 1 19879];
bode(num,den);
grid;
6. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
Simulation Results:
Theoretical Result:
9. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Able to identify maximum phase lag.
Able to understand compensating network.
Able to understand frequency response.
3. AIM:
(a) To design RC lag compensating network for the given specifications. Viz, the maximum
phase lag and the frequency at which it occurs, and to obtain its frequency response.
(b) To determine experimentally the transfer function of the lag compensating network
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
The characteristics of lag compensator's:
Consider lag compensator having the following transfer function:
Gc(s)=Kcβ [(Ts+1)/(βTs+1)]=Kc[s+(1/T)] / [s+(1/βT)] where (β>1)
In the complex plane, lag compensator has a zero at s=-(1/T) and a pole at s=-(1/βT). The pole is
located to the right of the zero.
The magnitude of a lag compensator becomes 10(or 20dB) at low frequencies and unity (or 0dB) at
high frequencies. Thus lag compensator is essentially a low pass filter.
The primary function of lag compensator is to provide attenuation in the high frequency range to
give a system sufficient phase margin. The phase lag characteristic is of no consequence in lag
compensation.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
9. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
Design of lag compensating network
Given Фm= ______degree and f= ________kHZ
1-sin Фm
α =β= ___________
1+sin Фm
therefore α = __________
T=1/(2 Π fn √ α) Sec.
T= __________µS
Let C = ______µF
R2=T/C= ________Ω
R1= βR2-R2=__________=__________Ω
Frequency
V0(p-p) in Volts Gain in dB Phase angle Фm Фm
in Hz
13. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
7. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
SIMULATION RESULTS:
At given design frequency of ____Hz.
Gain in dB =______dB. Phase angle= ___°.
Theoretical Results:
9. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Able to identify phase lead-lag.
Able to understand compensating network.
Able to understand frequency response.
Importance of compensating network.
3. AIM:
Experiment to draw the frequency response characteristic of a given lag- lead compensating
network.
5. THEORY / Hypothesis:
Characteristic of lead lag compensator: Consider the lead-lag compensator given by
[S+(1/T1)] [S+(1/T2)]
Gc(s)=Kc --------------------- × ---------------------
[s+ α /T1] [S+(1/βT2)]
where α>1 and β>1 . The term,
[S+(1/T2)] [T2s+1]
--------------------- = β --------------------- (β>1)
Nature of Graph:
R2=T/C= ________Ω
1+sin Фm
14. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. AIM: To draw the frequency response characteristics of the lag-lead compensator network and
determination of its transfer function.
4. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
Refer 6A experiment theory.
6. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
11. OUTCOME:
12. CONCLUSIONS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. TITLE:
STUDY OF P, PI ,PD AND PID CONTROLLER
3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Different types of controllers
Able to identify steady state error.
Able to know peak overshoot.
4. AIM:
To study the effect of P, PI, PD and PID controller on the step response of a feedback control
system (using control engineering trainer/process control simulator). Verify the same by simulation.
THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
Introduction to PID controllers
A controller is a device which when introduced in feedback or forward path of system, controls the
steady state and transient response as per the requirement. Such device converts input to the controller
to some other from of error than proportional to error due to which steady state and transient response
gets improved. In most of the practical systems, controller input is proportional to error generated.
Such systems are called proportional to error mechanisms (P type)
Consider such second order system where controller input is error itself and proportional constant is
K=1 as shown in the fig 7.40
By increase in Kv i.e increase in system gain, s.s error can be reduced but due to high gain settling time
and peak overshoot increases. This may lead to instability of system. So, compromise is made to keep
steady state error and overshoot within acceptable limits by providing following different types of
controllers.
i)PD ----> Proportional+ Derivative Action.
ii)PI -----> Proportional + Integral Action.
iii)PID ----> Proportional + Derivative + Integral Action.
iv)Rate feedback controller (output derivative controller)
PD type controller:
A controller in the forward path, which changes the controller input to the proportional plus derivative
of error signal is called PD controller.
PI type of controller:
A controller in the forward path, which changes the controller input to the proportional
plus integral of the error signal is called PI controller.
i.e Input to controller = K e(t) + Ki ∫ e(t) dt
Taking Laplace = KE(s) + (Ki/s) E(s) = E(s) [ K+(Ki/s)]
Therefore The T.F of such controller is [ K+(Ki/s)] and can be realised shown in the fig 7.42
2.Set the input amplitude 2V (p-p) and frequency to lower value, Ki=0, Kd=0.
3.Set Kp=1.6 record the peak over shoot and steady state error.
4.Repeat above steps for different values of Kcin small steps
CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
BLOCK DIAGRAM
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
PI- Controller:
% Steady state % peak
Division Ki=0.002 *div*____ x y
error overshoot
PID- Controller:
PD- Controller:
% Steady state % peak
Division Kd=0.002 *div*____ x y
error overshoot
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
(P-P)I/P-x
ess= ------------------
(P-P)I/P
Y-X
%peak overshoot= --------- ×100
x
14. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Understanding of step response of different controller.
Understanding of effect of damping factor.
Ability to use MATLAB command.
6. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
Refer 7A experiment theory.
PI-Controller
%unit step response of 2nd order system with PI-controller
num=[0 0 100 20];
den=[.02 1 100 20];
step(num,den);
grid;
Title(„Unit step response of 2nd order system with PI-controller
T(s)=(100*s+20)/(.02*s^3+s^2+100s+20)‟)
PID-Controller
%unit step response of 2nd order system with PID-controller
num=[0 0.7 100 20];
den=[.02 1.7 100 20];
step(num,den);
grid;
Title(„Unit step response of 2nd order system with PID-
controller T(S)=(.7S^2+100S+20)/(.02S^3+1.7S^2+100S+20)‟)
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
8. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
P- Controller
PI-Controller:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
PID-Controller
SIMULATION RESULTS:
For P-Controller:
Rise time= __________Sec
Settling time = __________Sec
% Overshoot = _________ %
For PI-Controller:
Rise time = __________Sec
Settling time = __________Sec
% Overshoot = _________ %
For PID-Controller:
Rise time = __________Sec
Settling time = __________Sec
% Overshoot = _________ %
11. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
To study the performance characteristics of second order systems using MATLAB.
To study the effect of additional poles and zeroes on time response of second order system.
To study the effect of pole location on stability.
To study the system stability.
3. AIM:
A) Simulation of a typical second order system and determination of step response and evaluation
of time- domain specifications.
B) Evaluation of the effect of additional poles and zeroes on time response of second order system.
C) Evaluation of effect of pole location on stability.
D) Effect of loop gain of a negative feedback system on stability.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER FUNCTION
Apply KVL to given network, we get
V0(t)=(1/C) ∫ i dt
Vi(s)=(R+SL+(1/SC))*I(s)
a) Simulation of a typical second order system and determination of step response and evaluation
of time- domain specifications.
clc
% prg c(t)
num = 1;
den = [1 10 20];
G = tf(num, den)
kp=dcgain(G)
ess=1/(1+kp)
w = sqrt (den(3))
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
B) Evaluation of the effect of additional poles and zeroes on time response of second order system.
8. FORMULA / CALCULATIONS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
9. GRAPHS / OUTPUTS:
14. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
2. AIM: 1. To obtain the step response of a DC Position control system using MAT LAB.
2. To verify the effect of input wave form, loop gain system type on steady state Errors.
3. THEORY: The DC Position Control System block diagram is given below.
Graph:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
PROGRAM:
n=[1];
d=conv([1 0],[0.1 1])
g=tf(n,d);
bode(g)
margin(g)
[gm,pm,wcp,wcg]=margin(g)
GMdb=20*log10(gm)
figure
fplot('1/(2*z*sqrt(1-z^2))',[0.0 0.8,0.01 10])
hold on
fplot('exp(-pi*z/sqrt(1-z^2))',[0.0 0.8,0.01 10])
hold off
xlabel('zeta')
ylabel('resonant peak,max.overshoot')
figure
fplot('1*sqrt((1-2*z^2)+sqrt(4*z^4-4*z^2+2))',[0.0 0.8,0.01 2])
xlabel('zeta')
ylabel('bandwidth')
6. REMARKS:
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
1. TITLE:
BODE, NYQUIST AND ROOT LOCUS WITH RESPECT TO STABILITY.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
Understanding of Effect of open loop gain & zeros
Understanding of stability analysis.
5. THEORY / HYPOTHESIS:
ROOT LOCUS
We have seen that the stability of any closed loop system depends on the locations of
the roots of the characteristic equation i.e the locations of closed loop poles. Nature of
the transient response is closely related to the location of the poles in the s-plane. It is
advantageous to know how the closed loop poles move in the s-plane if some
parameters of the system are varied. The knowledge of such movement of the closed
loop poles with small changes in the parameters of the system greatly helps in the
design of any closed loop system.
Such movement of the poles can be known by the Root Locus method, introduced by
W.R.Evans in 1948. This is graphical method, in which movement of poles in the s-
plane is sketched when a particular parameter of system is varied from zero to infinity.
Note that the parameter is usually the gain but any other parameter may be varied. But
for root locus method, gain is assumed to be a parameter which is to be varied from
zero to infinity.
BODE PLOT
Basic of any frequency response is to plot magnitude M and angle Ф against input
frequency 'ω' . When 'ω' is varied from 0 to ∞ there is wide range of variations in M
and Ф and hence it becomes difficult to accommodate all such variations with linear
scale. Hence H.W. Bode suggested the method in which logarithmic values of
Magnitude are to be plotted against logarithmic values of frequencies. Such plots are
called Logarithmic plots which allows us to show wide range of variations in
magnitude on a single paper.
In general Bode plot consists of two parts.
1) Magnitude expressed in logarithmic values against logarithmic values of frequency
called Magnitude plot.
2) Phase angle in degrees against logarithmic values of frequency called phase angle
plot.
S J P N Trust's E&E Engg.
The concept of Nyquist plot is based on the polar plot which can be conveniently applied to the stability
analysis of any kind of system. The concept is little bit difficult to understand and hence we will divide
the discussion in following sections to unfold the Nyquist plot, step by step.
a. Pole-Zero configuration from Nyquist plot point of view.
b. Concept of encirclement and number of encirclements.
c. Analytic function and its singularities.
d. Mapping theorem or principle of argument.
e. Nyquist stability criterion.
%Program
n=[0 0 0 1];
d=[1 5 6 0];
sys=tf(n,d);
rlocus(sys);
sgrid(0.2,0.0);
k=rlocfind(sys)
title('Root locus');
figure
%set the “grid” for plots to2 rows and 2 columns. place
%the first plot at locaction1.
subplot(2,2,1);
bode(num,den);
title(„bode plot‟);
subplot(2,2,3);
rlocus(num,den);
title(„root locus‟);
subplot(2,2,4);
nyquist(num,den);
title(„nyquist plot‟);
14. REMARKS: