CCTLSyllabus Guide
CCTLSyllabus Guide
Introduction
The aim of this document is to provide guidance on how to construct a syllabus. It discusses
seven possible sections of a syllabus, providing an explanation of what one might include in
each and, where appropriate, considerations on how to frame that section based in key
pedagogical principles. An individual instructor might choose different sections to include in
their syllabus, combine them in various ways, or title and order them differently, which is as it
should be. Sample language is included when it might be useful to illustrate how to frame this
information in the syllabus, but this is only meant to provide illustrative examples, not to
suggest required language.
As you will see, various pedagogical ideas are introduced throughout in support of these two
central aims. We have attempted to provide clear, concise explanations with an eye always to
how instructors can practically make use of these ideas when constructing a syllabus. We have
included references where supplemental reading may help to explicate these further (the
broader set of references that informed the construction of this guide is provided at the end).
You are encouraged to meet with a colleague in the Chicago Center for Teaching (CCT) to discuss
any of these ideas and to think through ways to translate them to your syllabus and teaching
practice. Faculty and other instructors can schedule an appointment through our online booking
portal, and graduate students and postdocs can schedule via Grad Gargoyle.
Sections
1. Basic Course Information
2. Course Description
3. Learning Objectives
4. Required Texts and Materials
5. Requirements (Grades, Assignments, or Assessment)
6. Class Policies (Guidelines or Norms)
7. Course Schedule
1
Revised September 2021
A Note on Language and Tone
To help foster a productive, learning-focused classroom environment, aim for a tone that is
positive, respectful, and inviting (Palmer et al. 5). We want to articulate clear, high expectations
for students, and to do so in a way that conveys enthusiasm about the material and students’
engagement with it, and that fosters an atmosphere of trust, intellectual encounter, and
scholarly inquiry. This means avoiding adversarial or scolding language, typing in all-caps, and
the like (Gannon). Use first- and second-person pronouns (we, you, I, and so on) when possible,
and aim to convey that you care about your students and their learning.
2. Course Description
Providing a brief, engaging description of the content, scope, and organizational logic helps to
set the stage for the course. The idea here is not to replicate what is in the course catalog
(though that may inform how you write it), but to explain to students what you take to be the
central concepts, questions, skills, and so on of the course. There are many ways to write an
effective course description. Here are a few considerations to help shape it:
2
Revised September 2021
188-92). Learning always proceeds from a students’ prior knowledge of the course
material, regardless of how accurate or sufficient it is (Ambrose et al. 10-39). And rather
than simply transmitting or depositing new knowledge into students’ heads, teaching
and learning is a matter of helping students change the way they understand the
concepts and skills that form the basis of your course. Use the course description to
begin to connect the new concepts and skills of your course with the mental models of
those concepts and skills students tend to bring into your class.1
3. Learning Objectives
Sound course design begins with learning objectives, which describe the knowledge and skills
that students should develop over the course of the term. Learning objectives articulate the
specific kinds of understandings students will achieve and should be written from the
perspective of the students using clear action verbs. A useful tool for developing learning
1
If you are unsure about the prior knowledge students bring into your class, it may be useful to talk with colleagues
who have previously taught the course (or similar material). You can also have students complete an ungraded
pre-assessment task—a low-stakes writing assignment, diagnostic quiz, survey, in-class discussion, or other form of
background knowledge probe—before or at the beginning of the term to assess and activate their prior knowledge.
3
Revised September 2021
objectives is Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, which lays out six categories of
learning, arranged hierarchically:
● Create
● Evaluate
● Analyze
● Apply
● Understand
● Remember
Further Considerations
Clear, transparent learning objectives help to:
● Clarify your expectations for the class, which in turn promotes student motivation
(Ambrose et al. 76-79).
● Scaffold the intellectual development of the course.
● Promote independent learning and metacognitive skills among students.
Finally, and crucially, a sound, learning-centered course design is based in the alignment among
the learning objectives, the assessment plan (i.e. student work and grades, see Requirements
below), and the teaching strategies we use during class. Therefore, thoughtfully constructed
learning objectives suggest how we will teach and how we expect students to practice and
demonstrate their understanding (Biggs; Wiggins and McTighe). Please see the Appendix below
for examples of learning objectives from across the University.
4
Revised September 2021
and get feedback on it—and student work should also provide us with useful
information on how well students are developing this skill. As Ken Bain puts it, the
fundamental assessment question is “What kind of intellectual and personal
development do I want my students to enjoy in this class, and what evidence might I
collect about the nature and progress of that development?” (152-53).
Alignment is also important to consider when giving weights to graded assignments. The
percentage of the final grade accounted for by a paper or exam should reflect the
importance of the learning objectives that it assesses.
● Articulate clear, high standards for student work and project confidence that students
can meet those standards.
While a fuller account of the expectations and standards for an assignment may be
provided in the assignment prompt and/or rubric, it is important to explain briefly the
kinds of intellectual achievements students should aim for in the assignments. Clarity
and transparency about this helps to set up a system of feedback that promotes an
inclusive learning environment (Cohen et al.; Yeager et al.).
Below, you will find the more common categories of policy that appear on a course syllabus,
along with at least one example of each (in italics). None of these are mandatory: they are
intended only to be illustrative options, not requirements. You are welcome to use and adapt
these as you like, or to formulate your own.
5
Revised September 2021
Inclusion, Diversity, and Class Climate
Make the connection between the values of inclusion and diversity and creating a productive
learning environment. Consider personalizing it to foster a warmer tone.
Students with disabilities who have been approved for the use of academic
accommodations by Student Disability Services (SDS) and need a reasonable
accommodation(s) to participate fully in this course should follow the procedures
established by SDS for using accommodations. Timely notifications are required in order
to ensure that your accommodations can be implemented. Please meet with me to
discuss your access needs in this class after you have completed the SDS procedures for
requesting accommodations. For more information, visit disabilities.uchicago.edu.
In addition to a syllabus policy, consider taking steps to enhance the accessibility of your course
with this checklist from the SDS office.
6
Revised September 2021
Because class discussion is at the heart of this course, you are required to be in class, and
what we do in the course of our class meetings will determine a large portion of your grade.
I understand that sometimes emergencies or other unexpected circumstances arise that
make attendance that day impossible. If this is the case, please contact me as soon as
possible so we can make arrangements to get you caught up. If you will be absent from a
class for a university-sponsored activity, please make arrangements with me in advance
regarding any work you might miss (adapted from Gannon).
Another approach is to grant a certain number of “grace days” that students can use to excuse
an absence or allow for late work. The idea here to is to be accommodating and flexible without
adjudicating particular requests or having students disclose personal matters they may not be
comfortable disclosing:
Class discussion is foundational to understanding the big ideas of the course, and timely
submission of assignments is essential for me to be able to provide feedback on your
work. Of course, I understand that sometimes emergencies and other circumstances can
arise that may warrant some flexibility. Accordingly, you will have two “grace days”
which you can use to excuse an absence and/or submit late work over the course of the
term. One missed class or one day past a due date equals one grace day. After you have
used all your grace days for the term, your attendance grade will be negatively affected
and a late penalty of one-third a letter grade will be assessed on assignments for each
day past a due date (i.e. from a B+ to a B).
Technology in Class
There is a spectrum of possibilities for how to think about laptops and other devices in class.
Some instructors, understandably, want to limit or ban them out of concern for the distraction
they can cause (both for the student using a device and those sitting nearby). On the other
hand, some disability accommodations allow for students to use laptops or other devices in
class; so allowing for this exception to a general ban calls attention to students with the
accommodation, which can be stigmatizing. Consider, also, that there are ways to convey to
students your expectations around devices in class without resorting to an outright ban. As
usual, connecting the policy to a rationale based in student learning helps to establish a
productive environment. James Lang provides a good overview of this issue and has also written
about the broader pedagogical issue of the distracted classroom.
You are welcome to use a laptop or tablet in this class as long as it contributes to your
learning. This class, once again, is discussion based. This means that all students are
expected to actively listen to one another in order to participate in classroom activities. If
you are unable to contribute to the discussion or are otherwise distracted by your
7
Revised September 2021
computer, cell phone, or tablet, I will ask that you refrain from using it in class. There will
be some class sessions where we will use technology together, and in those instances, all
students should make arrangements to bring a laptop or tablet to class. If you have any
questions or concerns, please be in touch with me.
Access to the Internet can be a valuable aid to the classroom learning environment. You
may be encouraged to use a laptop, smart phone, or other device to explore concepts
related to course discussions and in-class activities. Keep in mind, however, that these
technologies can be distracting – not only for you, but to others in the class. Please avoid
the temptation of Facebook, texting, or other off-topic diversions.
Our primary purpose in class is to talk with one another about our ideas after carefully
reading and analyzing these texts, so any technology use should be in the service of that
aim, and should not hinder or distract from it. So, if you use a laptop or tablet, please do
so for course purposes only and consider turning off wi-fi.
Academic Integrity
Acting with academic integrity is essential for students’ academic development and ability to
achieve course goals. Our aim with this policy is to communicate this to students, along with the
seriousness of academic dishonesty, without conveying the message that we expect that they
will cheat, which can undermine trust.
Please note that an important element of academic integrity is fully and correctly
attributing any materials taken from the work of others. Feel free to consult with me
before completing assignments if you have concerns about the correct way to reference
the work of others. More generally, please familiarize yourself with the University’s
policy on academic honesty, which applies to this course. Of course, I do not anticipate
any problems with academic integrity. In the unlikely event that any concerns do arise
regarding this matter, I will forward all related materials to the College for further review
and action.
Acting with academic integrity means, in brief, not submitting the statements, work, or
ideas of others as one’s own. Students are expected to comply with University
regulations regarding honest work. If you are in doubt about what constitutes academic
dishonesty, speak with me before the assignment is due. Failure to maintain academic
integrity on an assignment will result in a penalty befitting the violation, up to and
including failing the course and further University sanctions. For more information,
consult the student manual.
7. Course Schedule
Laying out a clear schedule of class activities, topics, readings, assignments, and other
important dates is central to making the expectations of the course transparent. Moreover,
topic or unit descriptions, “big” or guiding questions, or other similar signposts help students to
8
Revised September 2021
understand the conceptual organization or arc of the course (see Course Description above).
Consider including the following in your course schedule:
● Readings or other assignments for each class meeting, including title, author, page
and/or chapter numbers.
● The big questions or conceptual themes for each day or unit. This helps students read
the texts in alignment with their intended purpose in the course and to prepare
themselves for the day’s discussion and activities.
● Guiding questions that suggest what students might focus on in their reading.
● Due dates for every graded assignment and exam.
Further considerations:
● Build in opportunities for students to practice and get feedback over the course of the
term.
A central ingredient in a productive learning environment is for students to be allowed
and encouraged to try out their (new, developing) ideas and skills, to come up short in
some way(s), receive feedback, and try again (Ambrose et al.121-52; Bain 99-109).
9
Revised September 2021
Appendix: Sample Learning Objectives
Below, please find sample learning objectives drawn from various courses across the University.
These are not mandatory and are meant only as examples to illustrate how you might formulate
your own learning objectives.
In a nutshell, students will learn how the Internet works. By the end of this course, students
should understand everything that happens “under the hood” when (for example) a web page is
requested, from the moment you click on a link in your browser to the moment you get the
requested page back.
10
Revised September 2021
● Follow a software development process/methodology to manage the life cycle of a
software system.
● Use tools that support the software development process (e.g., build systems, testing
frameworks, debuggers, etc.)
● Develop software collaboratively through (a) the use of tools, systems, and best
practices available to facilitate that collaboration (e.g., version control systems, code
reviews, task tracking, etc.), and (b) exercising collaborative skills (communication,
giving/accepting feedback, etc.)
11
Revised September 2021
References
Ambrose, Susan A., Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett, and Marie K.
Norman. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching.
Jossey-Bass, 2010.
Bain, Ken. What the Best College Teachers Do. Harvard University Press, 2004.
Biggs, John. “Enhancing Teaching Through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education, vol.
32, 1996, pp. 347-64.
Cohen, Geoffrey L., Claude M. Steele, and Lee D. Ross. “The Mentor’s Dilemma: Providing
Critical Feedback Across the Racial Divide.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
vol. 25, 1999, pp. 1302-18.
Eyler, Joshua. How Humans Learn: The Science and Stories Behind Effective College Teaching.
West Virginia University Press, 2018.
Howard, James. Discussion in the College Classroom: Getting Your Students Engaged and
Participating in Person and Online. Jossey-Bass, 2015.
Lang, James. Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. Jossey-Bass,
2016.
Palmer, Michael, Dorothe Bach, and Adriana Streifer. “Measuring the Promise: A Valid and
Reliable Syllabus Rubric.” To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational
Development, vol. 33, 2014, pp. 14-36.
Yeager, David Scott, Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, Julio Garcia, Nancy Apfel, Patti Brzustoski,
Allison Master, William T. Hessert, Matthew E. Williams, and Geoffrey L. Cohen.
“Breaking the Cycle of Mistrust: Wise Interventions to Provide Critical Feedback Across
the Racial Divide.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 143, 2014, pp. 804-24.
12
Revised September 2021