28/01/2022, 13:55 ORTI

HENRY WANG
1083-6920-93 person
Please select:
Subject
menu ICAS - Writing | 2021 | Year 3

ICAS - Writing arrow_drop_down Criteria

Writing is a criterion-referenced assessment. This means that each piece of writing receives
Year
an objective score for each criterion. The table below shows aspects of writing achieved by
2021 arrow_drop_down Year 3 students. Aspects that Henry did not achieve are shaded.

Summary Criterion Numberarrow_upward Score Point Criterion Description Score Point Description AU % Achieved

The writing is
Criteria
1 1 Genre brief or lacks 97
coherence.
Certificates The writing is
formulaic with
1 2 Genre internally 53
consistent
arguments.
The writing is
1 3 Genre coherent and 3
well-structured.
At least two
structural
2 1 Structure 87
components are
present.
All structural
components are
2 2 Structure 45
present and
distinct.
All structural
components are
distinct with at
2 3 Structure least two 5
developed to
support the
argument.
The writing
presented brief
3 1 Idea Quality arguments or only 95
used a personal
appeal.
The writing
presented
arguments which
3 2 Idea Quality 36
had some
elaboration or
exemplification.
The writing
presented
objective
3 3 Idea Quality 1
arguments which
were coherently
justified.
The writing used
one common
rhetorical device
Rhetorical
4 1 (e.g. repetition, 94
Devices
hyperbole) or
correct modal
auxiliaries.

https://orti.icasassessments.com/Student/Criteria/2021/ICAS - Writing/1083692093 1/3

28/01/2022, 13:55 ORTI

HENRYAU WANG
Criterion Numberarrow_upward Score Point Criterion Description Score Point Description
person
% Achieved
1083-6920-93

The writing used

menu
Please select: ICAS - Writing | 2021 | YearRhetorical
3 some common
Subject 4 2 rhetorical devices 43
Devices
(e.g. repetition,
ICAS - Writing arrow_drop_down hyperbole).
The writing used
Year
some
2021 arrow_drop_down sophisticated
Rhetorical rhetorical devices
4 3 1
Devices (e.g.
Summary understatement,
figurative
language).
Criteria Appropriate
vocabulary was
5 1 Vocabulary 63
Certificates used to support
the argument.
Some effective
vocabulary was
5 2 Vocabulary 11
used to enhance
the argument.
A range of
effective
5 3 Vocabulary vocabulary was 1
used to enhance
the argument.
There were a few
errors in the use
6 1 Cohesion 93
of pronouns or
connectives.
Pronouns and
connectives were
6 2 Cohesion 44
correct on all
occasions.
Most sentences
were correct;
7 1 Grammar 79
there were many
grammar errors.
Nearly all
sentences were
7 2 Grammar correct; there 54
were some
grammar errors.
Nearly all
sentences,
including some
7 3 Grammar for effect, were 21
correct; there
were a few
grammar errors.
Nearly all
sentences,
including complex
7 4 Grammar sentences, were 2
correct; there
were 1-2
grammar errors.
Capital letters and
full stops were
used to indicate
8 1 Punctuation 86
almost all
sentence
boundaries.

https://orti.icasassessments.com/Student/Criteria/2021/ICAS - Writing/1083692093 2/3

28/01/2022, 13:55 ORTI

HENRYAU WANG
Criterion Numberarrow_upward Score Point Criterion Description Score Point Description
person
% Achieved
1083-6920-93

All sentence

menu
Please select: ICAS - Writing | 2021 | Year 3 boundaries were
Subject indicated and
8 2 Punctuation 45
nearly all simple
ICAS - Writing arrow_drop_down punctuation was
correct.
Year
Nearly all simple
2021 arrow_drop_down and nearly all
8 3 Punctuation complex 11
punctuation were
Summary correct.
All simple and all
complex
Criteria 8 4 Punctuation 1
punctuation were
correct.
Certificates

https://orti.icasassessments.com/Student/Criteria/2021/ICAS - Writing/1083692093 3/3