Hire Purchase
Hire Purchase
Hire Purchase
NAME: ABDUR
ABDUR RAHMAN
RAHMAN BIN
BIN
MOHAMMED
MOHAMMED (21BB04011)
(21BB04011)
SUBJECT:
SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL LAW
LAW
(SBSU
(SBSU 2093)
2093)
TOPIC:
TOPIC: HIRE
HIRE PURCHASE
PURCHASE
PRESENTING
PRESENTING FOR:
FOR: DR.NORAZLA
DR.NORAZLA
BINTI
BINTI ABDUL
ABDUL WAHAB
WAHAB
REPOSSESSION
Definition of repossession.
Repossession is a legal process through which a creditor
reclaims property or goods from a borrower who has failed to
meet their financial obligations, typically by failing to make
required payments according to the terms of a loan or
agreement. This can involve seizing assets such as vehicles,
real estate, or other valuable items pledged as collateral.
02
REPOSSESSION
PROCESS
4.Repossession ( S 18(3) )
The owner reclaims the goods from the hirer's
ownership using the repossession order,
according to the processes specified in Section
18(3) and accompanied by enforcement
authorities.
REPOSSESSION
PROCESS
The court held that section 16 clearly specifies that the period before
which the seizure can take place shall not be less than twenty-one days
after the service of the notice. However, the date specified in the notice
was two days short of the statutory minimum. The notice was therefore
bad in law even if served. Its effect was therefore null and void.
GUARANTOR
Who is guarantor?
under section 22
1. S 22 (a): If the guarantor agrees to pay more money than the original loan amount:
Any agreement where the guarantor commits to paying an amount larger than the
original loan balance becomes invalid.
2. S 22 (b): If the guarantor agrees to take on obligations for goods not included in the hire-
purchase agreement:
Any agreement where the guarantor agrees to fulfill responsibilities related to goods not
part of the original agreement is also considered invalid.
RIGHTS OF GUARANTOR AGAINST OWNER
Under section 23
1. Guarantor's Right to Discharge:
The guarantor can clear their obligation by paying the amount owed by the borrower to
the lender at any time.
2. Rights Upon Payment:
After paying, the guarantor has two options:
(a) They can either sue the borrower in the lender's name for any breaches of the hire-
purchase agreement, but they need to cover the lender's legal costs. Alternatively,
they can sue the borrower in their own name if they legally take over the debt.
(b) The guarantor can demand that any collateral the lender holds from the borrower
to secure the debt be transferred to them.
3. Right to Setoff or Counter-claim:
If the lender makes a claim against the guarantor under the guarantee, the guarantor
can use any valid claims or counter-claims the borrower may have against the lender to
defend themselves.
RIGHTS OF GUARANTOR AGAINST HIRER.
Under section 24
S 24 (1) Guarantor's Right to Indemnification:
The guarantor has the right to be reimbursed by the borrower for any claims made by
the lender under the guarantee. In simpler terms, if the lender demands payment from
the guarantor, the borrower must compensate the guarantor for this amount.
Under section 25
Guarantors do not have the right to take possession of
property, like the owner does under the hire-purchase
agreement. However, if the agreement specifically allows
it, the guarantor can use this right
GUARANTOR NOT TO SEIZE
Under section 25
Guarantors do not have the right to take possession of
property, like the owner does under the hire-purchase
agreement. However, if the agreement specifically allows
it, the guarantor can use this right
UNION BANK V. GRADSKY
In the case of Union Bank v. Gradsky, Bess Gradsky borrowed money from
Union Bank, with Max Gradsky acting as her contractor. Max also signed a
guarantee promising to pay if Bess defaulted on the loan. When Bess couldn't
repay the loan and the bank sold the property used as collateral through a
nonjudicial sale, they sued Max to recover the remaining debt.
However, the court ruled in favor of Max Gradsky. They held that the bank
couldn't pursue Max for the debt because they chose to sell the property
instead of going to court first. The guarantee agreement also stated that Max
couldn't force the bank to take any other action, further shielding him from
liability. This decision established that a guarantor of a loan secured by real
estate is shielded from liability for the remaining debt after a nonjudicial sale of
the property.
THANK YOU