Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6):626-632 Research Article

Engineering and Applied Science Research

https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/index
Published by the Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Performance and sustainability evaluation of rice husk-powered dryer under natural and
forced convection mode

Fredy Surahmanto1), Anak Agung Putu Susastriawan*2), Suparni Setyowati Rahayu3) and Bambang Wahyu Sidharta2)
1)Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2)Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institut Sains & Teknologi AKPRIND, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3)Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Sains & Teknologi AKPRIND, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Received 7 July 2023

Revised 7 September 2023
Accepted 16 October 2023

Abstract

Sun drying method has been used for drying agricultural commodities for centuries worldwide. The sun drying can be performed either
by direct drying of the product under sunlight or drying using a solar collector-based dryer. However, a problem arises during the rainy
season when there are lack of sunlight for proper drying. The application of biomass waste-powered dryers is a potential sustainable
technology to encounter the problem. The present work aims to evaluate the performance and sustainability indicator of the rice husk-
powered dryer under natural and forced convection modes while drying chili. The performance of the dryer evaluated is energy and
exergy efficiency, and specific energy consumption (SEC). Meanwhile, the sustainability indicators evaluated are the waste-to-energy
ratio (WER) and sustainability index (SI). The results show the performance and the sustainability indicator of the dryer are better
under forced convection mode than that under natural convection mode. Overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the dryer are 3.58%
and 4.93% under natural convection mode and the values are 16.85% and 16.13%, under force convection mode. Whereas, the SEC of
the dryer is 26602.91 kg of rice husk/kg of water vapour for natural convection mode and 6979.89423 kg of rice husk/kg of water
vapour under force convection mode. Furthermore, the sustainability of the dryer is better under force convection than under natural
convection mode. WER under forced convection mode is lower than WER under natural convection mode. This gives a higher
sustainability index (SI) of the dryer when operated under forced convection. The SI of the dryer ranges from 1.42 under natural
convection to 1.92 under forced convection mode.

Keywords: Convection, Dryer, Forced, Natural, Sustainability

1. Introduction

Drying an agricultural commodity under sunlight is a common method used by farmers around the world. The main problem with
the sun drying technique is the longer drying time. For example, it requires a week to attain a moisture content of 7.0%-7.5% of the
agricultural product under adequate sunshine drying [1]. In order to shorten drying time, a solar collector-based dryer is applied. The
solar collector absorbs heat from sunlight and uses it to warm up the air as a drying medium [2-4]. This technology still has problems
when no sunshine is available. Another dryer that handles the lack of sunshine is a dryer with flue gas from a diesel engine as a drying
medium [5]. Since the engine needs diesel fuel, the dryer lacks sustainability. Previous study revealed that the utilization of biomass
as an alternative energy source could reduce energy outlay and improve economic constraints [6]. Thus, a biomass energy-based dryer
is a promising drying technology for encountering those problems since Indonesia has huge biomass energy resources, approximately
33 GW [7]. Besides, the utilization of alternative biomass energy promotes a reduction in the emission of carbon dioxide and prevents
a high carbon footprint process [8, 9].
The performance of a convection dryer can be affected by convection mode, i.e. natural convection mode and forced convection
mode. Forced convection mode dryer has higher thermal efficiency than natural convection mode dryer. Thermal efficiency of the
forced convection and natural convection of solar dryers were found to be 67.66% and 59.74%, respectively [4]. The thermal efficiency
of a sliced turmeric fingers biomass powered dryer was found to be 4.35% and 4.62% for passive mode and active mode [10]. Excessive
heat loss from a drying chamber in the biomass-powered dryer may be encountered by attaching thermal insulation to the drying
chamber’s wall [11].
Based on the first law of thermodynamics, energy analysis describes the thermal performance of the dryer. It gives only information
about the type of energy and quantities of energy input and output of a process, not the quality of energy, such as losses due to
irreversibility and surrounding environmental conditions [12]. Thus, exergy analysis based on the second law of thermodynamics is
needed to overcome the limitations of energy analysis [13]. Exergy is defined as the maximum work that can be obtained from a system.
There will be always exergy losses due to irreversibility in a process, which is equal to entropy generation [14]. Energy and exergy
analysis (EEA) is helpful for better assessment of the thermodynamic performance of the dryer, designing the effective dryer, and
optimising the drying process as it considers the quality and quantity of energy, losses due to irreversibility and surrounding

*Corresponding author.
Email address: [email protected]
doi: 10.14456/easr.2023.65
Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6) 627

environmental conditions [15-17]. Several works on EEA of various types of dyers for drying different products have been reported so
far. The EEA of microwave dryer for drying kiwi slices has been reported by Darvishi et al. [18]. The EEA of drying jackfruit skin in
a solar tunnel dryer was carried out by Chowdhury et al.[19]. Meanwhile, the EEA of tomato drying in three different dryers, convective
hot-air drying (HAD), a combination of hot air with microwave (MW-HAD), and combined hot air with infrared (IR-HAD) have been
carried out by El-Mesery and El-Khawaga [20]. The EEA analysis revealed that the performance of forced convection was better than
that of natural convection.
Terms of waste-to-energy ratio (WER) and sustainability index are commonly used to evaluate the sustainability of thermal
systems. The thermodynamic performance of the dryer can be better evaluated using exergy sustainability indicators in terms of a
waste-to-exergy ratio (WER) and sustainability index (SI). The indicators address the irreversibility and exergy losses in a process for
a given exergy input [21].
From biomass-based dryers have been reported so far, many dryers used hot air as a drying medium. Heat from biomass combustion
is used to heat the air [22]. Some dryers utilized direct flue gas from biomass combustion as a drying medium [23]. Thus, the present
work performed an analysis of energy, exergy, and sustainability of the rice husk-based dryer with flue gas as a drying medium while
drying chili under natural and forced convection modes.

2. Materials and methods

The flow diagram of the present work is presented in Figure 1. The work begins with experimental work followed by data analysis.
The experiment was conducted at the Laboratory of Energy Conversion, Institute Sains & Teknologi AKPRIND Yogyakarta. The test
was done using rice husk as an energy source while drying chili under natural and forced convection modes. Once data are obtained,
energy, exergy, and sustainability analyses were performed.

Start

Waste of Rice husk

Agriculture product (chili)
Biomass energy powered dryer

Experimental work
Natural & Forced convection mode

Data analysis
Energy, Exergy, Sustainability

Results & Discussion

Finish

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the present work.

Flue gas outlet

Exhaust fan
Exhaust fan
Water vapor outlet Drying cabinet

Tg,out

Tray 3 T3

Tray 2 T2 Blower

Furnace
Tray 1 T1

Drying cabinet
Thermocouples

Data
Flue gas
K-type

Logger
inlet Tg,in
Blower

Furnace

Figure 2 A photograph of a rice husk-powered dryer and schematic of the experimental set-up.

2.1 Experimental work

Figure 2 shows a photograph of a rice husk-powered dryer and a schematic of the experimental setup of the present work. The
dryer has the main components of a furnace, a drying cabinet, a blower, and an exhaust fan. A sample of the agricultural commodity
628 Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6)

(i.e. 3 kg of chili) was dried in 3 trays in the drying cabinet for 2 hours. Rice husk was burnt in the furnace to generate a flue gas as a
drying medium of the dryer. The combustion air in the furnace was supplied by the blower. A flue gas flew upward to the passage
between the inner wall and outer wall of the drying cabinet. There was no contact between the flue gas and drying product (i.e. indirect
type dryer). To operate the dryer under forced convection mode, the flue gas is induced into the passage using the exhaust fan. The
temperature of the sample in each tray (T1, T2, T3), the temperature of flue gas entering (Tg,in) and leaving (Tg,out) the passage, and
ambient temperature (To) were measured using K-type thermocouples and logged into datalogger GraphTech240. The rice husk is sun
dried to reduce its moisture content about 30%. Thus, this pre-treatment of the rice husk aims to ensure flue gas temperature which
keep cabinet temperature at its setup temperature.

2.2 Data analysis

The data obtained is used to evaluate energy and exergy efficiency, specific energy consumption, and sustainability indicators
(waste-to-energy ratio and sustainability index) of the dryer.

2.2.1 Energy analysis

Energy efficiency of the furnace [10]:

𝑄𝑓,𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑚𝑔, 𝑐𝑝,𝑔 (𝑇𝑔 − 𝑇0 )

𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑓 = = (1)
𝑄𝑓,𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑏 𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑏

where 𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑓 is the energy efficiency of a furnace, Qf,out is the heat generated from rice husk combustion, Qf,in is the energy input to the
furnace, mg is the mass of flue gas, cp,g is the specific heat of flue gas (1.0 kJ/kg.K) [24], Tg and To are the flue gas temperature and the
ambient temperature, mb is the mass of rice husk, and HHVb is the higher heating value of rice husk (13.03 MJ/kg) [7].

The energy efficiency of the drying cabinet [22, 25]:

𝑄𝑔,𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 (𝑚𝑠,𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑝,𝑠 ∆𝑇𝑠 ) + (𝑚𝑣 ℎ𝑓𝑔 )

𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑑 = = (2)
𝑄𝑔,𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑔,,𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑝,𝑔 (𝑇𝑔,𝑖𝑛 − 𝑇0 )

where 𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑑 is the energy efficiency of a furnace, Qg,used is the amount of heat used for evaporation of water vapour of the sample, Qg,in
is the heat amount of heat flows through the passage, m s,in is the initial mass of the sample, cp,s is the specific heat of sample, Ts the
temperature different of the sample, mv is the mass of water vapour evaporated, hfg is the latent heat of vaporization of water (2260
kJ/kg), mg is the mass of flue gas, Tg,in is the inlet temperature of flue gas. Assuming 0.65 volumetric efficiency of a passage, the mass
of flue gas is calculated using Eq. (3). The mass of water vapour is obtained from the mass difference between the initial and final mass
of the sample as given in Eq. (4).

∑ 𝑚𝑔,𝑖𝑛 = 0.65𝜌𝑔 𝐴𝑣𝑔 (3)

𝑚𝑣 = 𝑚𝑠,𝑖𝑛 − 𝑚𝑠,𝑜𝑢𝑡 (4)

where 𝜌𝑔 is the density of flue gas, A is the cross-sectional area of the passage, vg is the velocity of flue gas, ms,out is the final mass of
a sample. The density of flue gas is obtained at atmospheric pressure and flue gas temperature using the graph given in
www.pipeflowcalculations.com [26].
Overall energy efficiency (𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑜 ) and specific energy consumption (SEC) are calculated using Eq. (5) and Eq. (6). SEC is the
amount of energy required for evaporating 1 kg of water vapour [27-29].

𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑜 = 𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑓 𝜂𝑒𝑛,𝑑 (5)

𝑄𝑓,𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑏 𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑏
𝑆𝐸𝐶 = = (6)
𝑚𝑣 𝑚𝑣
2.2.2 Exergy analysis

Exergy is a measure of the quality of energy based on the second law of thermodynamics. It is the available energy that can be used
that provides information about available energy that can be used to optimize the drying process in the dryer [30]. Assuming a steady
flow drying process, exergy per unit mass of any system is proposed by Mugi and Chandramohan [15] as

𝑇
𝐸𝑥 = 𝑚𝑐𝑝 [(𝑇 − 𝑇0 ) − 𝑇0 𝑙𝑛 ( )] (7)
𝑇0

Exergy efficiency of the furnace:

𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝜂𝑒𝑥.𝑓 = (8)
𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑖𝑛

where 𝜂𝑒𝑥.𝑓 is the exergy efficiency of a furnace, 𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑖𝑛 and 𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑜𝑢𝑡 are the inflow and outflow exergy of the furnace which are
calculated using Eq. (9) and Eq. (10).
Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6) 629

Exergy inflow to a furnace represents the chemical exergy of biomass fed into the furnace which can be calculated using a simple
equation proposed by Song et al.[31].

𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑖𝑛 = 1.047𝑚𝑏 𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑏 (9)

𝑇𝑔
𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝑚𝑔 𝑐𝑝,𝑔 [(𝑇𝑔 − 𝑇0 ) − 𝑇0 𝑙𝑛 ( )] (10)
𝑇0

Exergy efficiency of the drying cabinet:

The exergy efficiency of a drying cabinet is estimated using Eq. (11) given by Akpinar [32].

𝐸𝑥𝑑,𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝜂𝑒𝑥.𝑑 = (11)
𝐸𝑥𝑑,𝑖𝑛

The inflow exergy to a drying cabinet (𝐸𝑥𝑑,𝑖𝑛 ) and outflow exergy from a drying cabinet (𝐸𝑥𝑑,𝑜𝑢𝑡 ) are determined using Eq. (12) and
Eq. (13) given by Kuzgunkaya and Hepbasli [33].

𝑇𝑔,𝑖𝑛
𝐸𝑥𝑔,𝑖𝑛 = 𝑚𝑔 𝑐𝑝,𝑔 [(𝑇𝑔,𝑖𝑛 − 𝑇0 ) − 𝑇0 𝑙𝑛 ( )] (12)
𝑇0

𝑇𝑠,𝑖𝑛
𝐸𝑥𝑔,𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 𝑚𝑠 𝑐𝑝,𝑠 [(𝑇𝑠,𝑜𝑢𝑡 − 𝑇0 ) − 𝑇0 𝑙𝑛 ( )] (13)
𝑇0

where, mg is the mass of flue gas entering the drying passage, cp,g is the specific heat of flue gas, Tg,in and Tg,out are the flue gas
temperatures entering and leaving the drying cabinet, ms is the mass of sample, cp,s is the specific heat of sample (1.87 kJ/kg.K), Ts,in
and Ts,out are the initial and final temperature of the sample, and T0 is the ambient temperature. Meanwhile, the overall exergy efficiency
of the drying system is obtained using Eq. (14)

𝜂𝑒𝑥,𝑜 = 𝜂𝑒𝑥,𝑓 𝜂𝑒𝑥,𝑑 (14)

2.2.3 Sustainability analysis

The thermodynamic performance of the dryer can be also evaluated using exergy sustainability indicators in terms of waste-to-
exergy ratio (WER) and sustainability index (SI) [34]. The indicators address the irreversibility and exergy losses in a process for a
given exergy input [15]. The WER and SI are calculated using equations proposed by Ndukwu et al. [21].

𝐸𝑥𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠
𝑊𝐸𝑅 = (15)
𝐸𝑥𝑖𝑛

1
𝑆𝐼 = (16)
1 − 𝜂𝑒𝑥

where exergy loss from the dryer (𝐸𝑥𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 ) is calculated using Eq. (17)

𝑇𝑔
𝐸𝑥𝑓,𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 𝐼𝑓 = 1.047𝑚𝑏 𝐻𝐻𝑉𝑏 − 𝑚𝑔 𝑐𝑝,𝑔 [(𝑇𝑔 − 𝑇0 ) − 𝑇0 𝑙𝑛 ( )] (17)
𝑇0

3. Results and discussion

Figure 3 presents drying rate of the sample in tray 1, tray 2, dan tray 3 under natural convection and forced convection mode. The
value is calculated by the mass different of the sample before and after 2 hours drying time. To prevent disturbing the drying process
due to opening the cabinet’s door during the process, the mass measurement of the sample is done before the and after drying. Thus,
the moisture loss evolution per second cannot be presented in the present work. However, the average drying rate for 2 hours drying
time can be obtained as given in Figure 3. It can be seen from the figure, the highest drying rate is obtained at tray 1 (i.e. the lowest
tray) either under natural convection or forced convection. The higher the position of the tray, the lower the drying rate of the sample
for both convection modes. More comprehensive discussion is given in the following section.
0,1
0,09 Natural Convection
0,08 Forced Convection
0,07
Drying rate (g/s)

0,06
0,05
0,04
0,03
0,02
0,01
0
Tray 1 Tray 2 Tray 3
Tray position

Figure 3 Drying rate

630 Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6)

Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the temperature of the sample in tray 1, tray 2, and tray 3 under natural convection and forced convection
mode. From Figure 4(a), it can be observed a small increase in the sample’s temperature under natural convection mode for 2 hours
drying. The temperatures of the sample in tray 1, tray 2, and tray 3 are almost similar, indicating uniform temperature distribution in
the drying cabinet. Different trends of the temperatures are observed under force convection mode. As shown in Figure 4(b), the
temperatures increase significantly after 10 minutes of drying till reaching a maximum temperature of 60C in tray 1 and a maximum
temperature of 50C in tray 3. The temperatures decrease after 90 minutes of drying. The temperature distribution in the drying cabinet
is less uniform under force convection mode when compared with that under natural convection. This may be due to the turbulent
effect of the flue gas flow caused by flow velocity increases from 2.5 m/s (natural convection mode) to 8 m/s (forced convection mode).
The average temperature of the sample in tray 1, tray 2, and tray 3 are given in Figure 5. It is clear that the average temperature of
the sample under forced convection mode is higher than that under natural convection mode. The higher velocity of a flue gas under
forced convection mode causes an increasing Reynold number of the flue gas flow. As we know, increasing Reynold number leads to
enhanced convection coefficient, and in turn improves heat transfer rate from the flue gas to the sample. In other words, the drying of
the sample is better under forced convection mode. From Figure 5, the natural convection shows linear trendlines between average
temperature’s cabinet and drying time. Average temperature of cabinet increases linearly as drying time proceeds. Meanwhile,
polynomial trendlines exists between drying time and average cabinet’s temperature. This indicates that cabinet’s temperature reaces
maximum at ¾ drying time and the temperature steps down in the following time. Thus, the mathematical model as shown in given in
Figure 5 can be used to predict the average cabinet’s temperature during drying process as a function of time.

80 80
70 (a) Natural convection 70
(b) Forced convection
Tray's Temp. (oC)

Tray's Temp. (oC)

60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
Tray 1
20 Tray 1
Tray 2 20
Tray 2
10 Tray 3 10
Tray 3
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (minute) Time (minute)

Figure 4 Temperature distribution in drying cabinet

80
Natural Convection
70
Average Temp. (oC)

60 Forced Convection
50 y = -0,421x2 + 8,4237x + 18,009
R² = 0,9677
40
30 y = 0,6632x + 27,96
20 R² = 0,9723
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Time (minute)

Figure 5 Average temperature of drying cabinet

Figures 6(a) and 6(b) display energy efficiency and specific energy consumption (SEC). The energy efficiency of the furnace, the
drying cabinet, and the overall energy efficiency of the dryer are higher under forced convection mode. Increasing the heat transfer rate
from flue gas to the drying cabinet by forced convection impacts enhancing energy utilization for drying the sample. Thus, a more
effective drying process occurs in the drying cabinet. This leads to improving the energy efficiency of the drying cabinet. Since the
overall efficiency of the dryer system is a function of furnace energy efficiency and drying cabinet energy efficiency, higher overall
energy efficiency under forced convection mode than under natural convection mode was also observed. Overall energy efficiencies
of the dryer are 3.58% under natural convection mode and 16.85% under forced convection mode. The overall energy efficiency
improves about three times when flue gas velocity increases from 2.5 m/s (natural convection mode) to 8 m/s (forced convection mode).
The thermal efficiency of the dryer is better under forced convection mode than under natural convection mode [4, 10]. The overall
energy efficiency of the dryer lies in the drying efficiency ranges of a conventional corn dryer based on the heat exchanger pipe diameter
obtained by Alit et al. [28] with values of 13.9% to 28.8%.
Increasing overall energy efficiency causes decreasing specific energy consumption of the dryer as can be seen in Figure 6(b).
Since the drying process is more effective under forced convection mode than under natural one, less amount of energy source (rice
husk) is required for evaporating 1 kg of water vapour during forced convection mode. The SECs of the dryer are 26602.91 kg of rice
husk/kg of water vapour for natural convection mode and 6979.89423 kg of rice husk/kg of water vapour. It can be stated that the SEC
reduces almost four times when the natural convection mode changes to force convection mode.
Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6) 631

100 35000
(a) Furnace (b)
Energy Efficiency (%) 30000
80 Drying Cabinet

SEC (kJ/kg w.v)

Overall 25000
60 20000

40 15000
10000
20
5000
0 0
Natural Forced Natural Forced
Convection Mode Convection Mode

Figure 6 Energy efficiency and SEC

Figure 7(a) displays exergy efficiency and Figure 7(b) shows sustainability indicators of the dryer. Following the trend of energy
efficiency, the overall exergy efficiency also moves up when the dryer is operated under forced convection mode. Useful exergy under
forced convection mode is higher than that under natural convection mode. Overall exergy efficiencies of the dryer under natural
convection mode and forced convection mode are 4.93% and 16.13%, respectively.
Furthermore, the sustainability of the dryer is better under forced convection than under natural convection mode. The waste-to-
energy ratio (WER) is smaller under forced convection mode than that under natural convection mode. This gives a higher sustainability
index (SI) of the dryer when operated under forced convection. The SI of the dryer ranges from 1.42 under natural convection to 1.92
under forced convection mode. The values obtained in the present work are lower than the values reported by Ndukwu et al. [21]. They
obtained the SI ranges from 3.01 to 8.15 while investigating the sustainability indicators of a solar dryer integrated with sodium sulfate
decahydrate and sodium chloride as a thermal storage medium.

100 3
(a) Furnace (b) WER
Exergy Efficiency (%)

80 Drying Cabinet SI
Overall
Sustanability

2
60

40
1
20

0 0
Natural Forced Natural Forced
Convection Mode Convection Mode

Figure 7 Exergy efficiency and sustainability indicator

4. Conclusions

The performance in terms of energy, exergy, and specific energy consumption (SEC) sustainability indicator in terms of waste to
energy ratio (WER) and sustainability index (SI) of the rice husk powered dryer are investigated while drying a chili under natural and
forced convection mode. It can be concluded that the energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, SEC, WER, and SI of the dryer are better
under forced convection. The increasing velocity of flue gas from 2.5 m/s (natural convection mode) to 8 m/s (forced convection mode)
enhances the heat transfer rate from flue gas to the sample in the drying cabinet. However, optimization of flue gas velocity under
forced convection mode has to be performed in future work in order to increase the performance and sustainability of the dryer.

5. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank BRIN (National Research and Innovation Agency) and LPDP (Endowment Funds for Education)
of the Republic of Indonesia for financial support through the scheme RIIM (Research and Innovation for Developed Indonesia) Batch
II 2022 with reference number 82/II.7/HK/2022.

6. References

[1] Tardzenyuy ME, Jianguo Z, Akyene T, Mbuwel MP. Improving cocoa beans value chain using a local convection dryer: A case
study of Fako division Cameroon. Sci Afr. 2020;8:e00343.
[2] Mathew AA, Thangavel V. A novel thermal energy storage integrated evacuated tube heat pipe solar dryer for agricultural
products: performance and economic evaluation. Renew Energ. 2021;179:1674-93.
[3] Ekka JP, Muthukumar P, Bala K, Kanaujiya DK, Pakshirajan K. Performance studies on mixed-mode forced convection solar
cabinet dryer under different air mass flow rates for drying of cluster fig. Sol Energy. 2021;229:39-51.
[4] Asnaz MSK, Dolcek AO. Comparative performance study of different types of solar dryers towards sustainable agriculture.
Energy Reports. 2021;7:6107-18.
632 Engineering and Applied Science Research 2023;50(6)

[5] Cui Y, Zhang G, Liu W, Li Z, Jiang N. Research on heat and mass transfer characteristics of flue gas flow drying biomass
particles. Procedia Eng. 2017;205:3898-902.
[6] Wincy WB, Edwin M. Techno-economic assessment on the implementation of biomass gasifier in conventional parboiling rice
mills. Int J Energy Res. 2020;44(3):1709-23.
[7] Susastriawan AAP, Purwanto Y, Purnomo, Warisman A. Development of an air-stage downdraft gasifier and performance
evaluation on feedstock of rice husk. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci. 2021;84(1):20-32.
[8] Pirasteh G, Saidur R, Rahman SMA, Rahim NA. A review on development of solar drying applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev.
2014;31:133-48.
[9] Motevali A, Koloor RT. A comparison between pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions from operation of different dryers based
on energy consumption of power plants. J Clean Prod. 2017;154:445-61.
[10] Rabha DK. Performance investigation of a passive-cum-active dryer with a biomass-fired heater integrated with a plate heat
exchanger. Renew Energ. 2021;169:598-607.
[11] Huang H, Yin S, Zhu G. Heat transfer performance for DCLL blanket with no-wetting insulator walls. Theor Appl Mech Lett.
2019;9(3):195-201.
[12] Suleman F, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated solar heat pump system. Appl Therm Eng.
2014;73(1):559-66.
[13] Wincy WB, Edwin M. Experimental energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E) analysis of biomass gasifier operated paddy dryer
in parboiling industry. Biomass Conv Bioref. 2022:1-16.
[14] Dincer I, Sahin AZ. A new model for thermodynamic analysis of a drying process. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2004;47(4):645-52.
[15] Mugi VR, Chandramohan VP. Energy and exergy analysis of forced and natural convection indirect solar dryers: estimation of
exergy inflow, outflow, losses, exergy efficiencies and sustainability indicators from drying experiments. J Clean Prod.
2021;282:124421.
[16] Wincy WB, Edwin M, Sekhar SJ. Energy and exergy evaluation of rice processing mills working with biomass gasifier in
parboiling process. Fuel. 2020;259:116255.
[17] Wincy WB, Edwin M, Arunachalam U, Sekhar SJ. Exergy based performance analysis of rice husk fuelled producer gas operated
boiler for thermal application in parboiling mills. Fuel. 2022;313:123018.
[18] Darvishi H, Zarein M, Farhudi Z. Energetic and exergetic performance analysis and modeling of drying kinetics of kiwi slices. J
Food Sci Technol. 2016;53(5):2317-33.
[19] Chowdhury MMI, Bala BK, Haque MA. Energy and exergy analysis of the solar drying of jackfruit leather. Biosyst Eng. 2011;
110(2):222-9.
[20] EL-Mesery HS, El-Khawaga SE. Drying process on biomass: evaluation of the drying performance and energy analysis of
different dryers. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;33:101953.
[21] Ndukwu MC, Bennamoun L, Abam FI, Eke AB, Ukoha D. Energy and exergy analysis of a solar dryer integrated with sodium
sulfate decahydrate and sodium chloride as thermal storage medium. Renew Energ. 2017;113:1182-92.
[22] Madhlopa A, Ngwalo G. Solar dryer with thermal storage and biomass-backup heater. Sol Energ. 2006;81(4):449-62.
[23] Ndukwu MC, Simo-Tagne M, Abam FI, Onwuka OS, Prince S, Bennamoun L. Exergetic sustainability and economic analysis
of hybrid solar-biomass dryer integrated with copper tubing as heat exchanger. Heliyon. 2020;6(2):e03401.
[24] Silva J, Ferreira AC, Teixeira S, Martins L, Ferreira E, Teixeira JC. Sawdust drying process in a large-scale pellets facility: an
energy and exergy analysis. Clean Environ Syst. 2021;2:100037.
[25] Lingayat A, Chandramohan VP, Raju VRK. Energy and exergy analysis on drying of banana using indirect type natural
convection solar dryer. Heat Transf Eng. 2020;41(6-7):551-61.
[26] Pipeflowcalculations.com. Pipe Network Analysis [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023]. Available from: https://www.pipe
flowcalculations.com/index.xhtml.
[27] Nazghelichi T, Kianmehr MH, Aghbashlo M. Thermodynamic analysis of fluidized bed drying of carrot cubes. Energy.
2010;35(12):4679-84.
[28] Alit IB, Susana IGB, Mara IM. Utilization of rice husk biomass in the conventional corn dryer based on the heat exchanger pipes
diameter. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2020;22:100764.
[29] Wincy WB, Edwin M, Sekhar SJ. Optimization of process parameters to implement biomass gasifier for drying high moisture
paddy in reversible flatbed dryer. Energy. 2022;249:123771.
[30] Aghbashlo M, Mobli H, Rafiee S, Madadlou A. A review on exergy analysis of drying processes and systems. Renew Sust Energ
Rev. 2013;22:1-22.
[31] Song G, Shen L, Xiao J. Estimating specific chemical exergy of biomass from basic analysis data. Ind Eng Chem Res.
2011;50(16):9758-66.
[32] Akpinar EK. Drying of mint leaves in a solar dryer and under open sun: modelling, performance analyses. Energy Convers.
Manag. 2010;51(12):2407-18.
[33] Kuzgunkaya EH, Hepbasli A. Exergetic evaluation of drying of laurel leaves in a vertical ground-source heat pump drying
cabinet. Int J Energ Res. 2007;31(3):245-58.
[34] Wincy WB, Edwin M, Sekhar SJ. Exergetic Evaluation of a biomass gasifier operated reversible flatbed dryer for paddy drying
in parboiling process. Biomass Conv Bioref. 2023;13(5):4033-45.