The Barlinnie Story by Robert Jeffrey
The Barlinnie Story by Robert Jeffrey
The Barlinnie Story by Robert Jeffrey
and redemption in
Scotlands infamous prison
Barlinnie is one of the most notorious prisons in the world
and for more than a hundred years it has held Glasgows
toughest and most violent men, swept up from the city streets.
Ten men died on its gallows in the infamous Hanging Shed,
including serial killer Peter Manuel. It has sparked rooftop
protests and cell-block riots, and been home to godfathers
of crime like Arthur Thompson Snr and Walter Norval.
Barlinnie was also the scene of one of the most controversial
experiments in penal history, the Special Unit, where the likes
of Jimmy Boyle and Hugh Collins were at the centre of a
fierce battle between those who see prison as retribution
and those who regard it as a step on the road to
redemption, even for the most evil killers.
Paul Ferris, TC Campbell and gangleaders galore
have languished behind its grim walls and, more than
a hundred years on, Barlinnie still makes headlines.
This is its fascinating, turbulent story.
PBB 198x129mm
7.99
17.5mm spine
the
barlinnie
story
Riots, Death, Retribution and Redemption
in Scotlands Infamous Prison
ROBERT JEFFREY
11 12 13
The publisher has made every reasonable effort to contact copyright holders
of images in the picture section. Any errors are inadvertent and anyone who,
for any reason, has not been contacted is invited to write to the publisher so that
a full acknowledgment can be made in subsequent editions of this work.
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
24
37
53
74
90
109
122
136
150
175
195
208
222
BARLINNIE TIMELINE
235
237
INDEX
239
introduction
there are those who argue that these sandstone monoliths must
still be useful if for no other reason than they are still standing.
Well, so are the pyramids. But no one has been buried inside
them for some time, former Governor McKinlay points out
wryly.
In the ongoing Barlinnie story thousands have been buried,
and are continuing to be buried, in the great, echoing halls.
Cast out from society, sentenced to pay for their crimes in one
of the toughest, most infamous prisons in the world. Alcatraz,
the Bangkok Hilton, Folsom, Strangeways, Pentridge, the Scrubs
. . . Barlinnie has an infamous place high in the list of the
worlds most fearsome jails. And still, day after day, the buses
now owned by a private company ferry the guilty from
some of the busiest courts in the world through the crowded
streets of Glasgow to begin their time. But its no consolation
to those who are in a living hell that they are part of the ongoing
history of one of the worlds iconic prisons.
That history is a strange mixture of villainy, humanity, tragedy,
drama and hope. The hope is that the future for this grim place,
and those incarcerated in it, will improve. That somehow the
hope of the Victorians who built it will turn to reality, the hope
that redemption will finally triumph over revenge. There is,
however, no great grounds for optimism since for most of its
120 or so years of life Barlinnie has been a permanently overcrowded and, until as recently as 2002 when slopping out ended,
an unsanitary repository for thousands of lawbreakers. If hope
is a contentious issue, the drama surrounding Barlinnie is undeniable. Down the years the prison has sparked thousands of
headlines. Drama and danger go with the job, as those in the
prison service who are charged by society to look after the
villains know only too well.
This Barlinnie Story is not a formal or indeed a chronological
history of the prison it is an unofficial, perhaps sometimes idiosyncratic, attempt to chronicle some of the momentous events
in the long turbulent life of an establishment that is infamous
2
INTRODUCTION
1
Flying Slates, Burning
Mattresses and Hostage Hell
Record man had been called to help the authorities in the negotiations at riots at Saughton and Peterhead the year before the
Barlinnie siege. In the late eighties the prison service was close
to anarchy. In the 87 Bar-L siege the prisoners shouted from
the roof to the crowds below that they wanted to speak to a
Record man. It didnt happen. This was an era of trouble in
most of Scotlands penal institutions and the press guys were
deployed with regularity to the countrys prisons. So much so
that some of the reporters who had covered the other riots now
gave serious thought to producing a T-shirt with the slogan:
Scottish Prison Tour 8687 Saughton, Peterhead and Barlinnie.
But in reality there was little to be humorous about.
The Peterhead riot was a major incident and one prison officer,
John Crossan, was held hostage along with more than 40 inmates
by a group of three prisoners. This siege in the prison up on
the cold north-east coast, which lasted for four days, created a
Scottish prison record for such an event though a few months
later the undesirable record for the longest siege passed to
Barlinnie. The riot in P-head, as the prisoners call it, ended in
a blaze that caused half a million pounds of damage. Talking
to Barlinnie staff who had been involved in the five-day siege
they wondered if, looking back, a desire to break the record
was a factor in prolonging the disturbance. Certainly, once the
record was broken, the Barlinnie riot collapsed pretty quickly.
The Peterhead happenings had come less than a fortnight
after a three-day siege at Saughton in Edinburgh when five
men held a prison officer at knifepoint before giving themselves up. The trouble at these two establishments had been
put down to alleged brutality against the inmates. And the
same accusation was to become central to the investigation of
the trouble in the Bar-L. All the media hullabaloo round the
87 riot meant that a clear and concise picture of what really
8
matter of fact. On 6 January the lead story began: Rioting prisoners threw slates from the roof of Barlinnie prison, Glasgow,
early today and made allegations of brutality at the jail. One
prison officer was injured after trouble broke out at B-Hall and
up to 20 inmates were said to be involved. At one point seven
men, two of them masked, could be seen on the roof. One
claimed to be a hostage. The trouble is believed to have started
at 8pm after a day of minor incidents.
There are a couple of skewed details in this early report: the
trouble had started nearly 12 hours earlier than suggested and
the incidents were far from minor.
The report went on: A group of prisoners on the top floor
of B-Hall later threw missiles at prison officers. When the
wardens retreated, the group barricaded itself on the top floor.
Some made their way to the roof. The Scottish Office press
team was about to start one of the busiest weeks in their history
and they started with a predictably negative statement that
seemed to run in the face of the facts. They denied that any
hostages had been taken, though one of the men on the roof
said he was being held against his will and that he had just
four weeks of his sentence to serve. Another protester shouted
down from the roof that hostages were being held inside the
hall.
The next day the picture of what was happening inside the
prison became clearer. By now there was talk of three officers
being held hostage. The seriousness of what was going on
could not be played down by the Scottish Office or the prison
authorities and as darkness fell one of the hostages was paraded
on the roof of B-Hall. A homemade knife was held at his throat
and he screamed, They are going to kill me. Maybe it was
something to do with the bitter cold of a January night in
Glasgow but, in any case as the light faded, the prisoners claimed
10
many of the prisoners in the other great halls who were not
involved in the riots but were aware of what was going on,
were almost on their best behaviour, showing some solidarity
with the warders.
One tale underlines the fact that even at the height of the
riot and afterwards some inmates did not share the feeling of
the mob who were hanging sheets from the rooftop with Slasher
Gallacher emblazoned on them. Not long after the riot was
over there was a prison concert and a skit in which one of the
cons appeared dressed up as Governor Andrew Gallacher. The
audience rewarded this appearance with a deadly silence, but
the so-called Slasher Gallacher, every eye on him, simply
burst out laughing. And so then did the audience.
There had been violent mood swings from the protesters in
the early days of the protest. After the so-called peace pledge
for the night made at that bizarre press conference, fire hoses
had been trained on the roof but they were switched off swiftly
when shouts from the roof claimed, Guys are going to be fucked
about if you dont turn the water off. The authorities did so
and claimed the hoses had only been intended to flush loose
slates and debris off the roof.
Tempers and emotions were running high. A humane side
to the protest surfaced briefly with the release of a prison officer
who was a diabetic and urgently needed insulin. In contrast,
the bright lights turned on the protestors angered them to the
point that the press corps was showered with stones and slates,
one hitting Herald photographer Arthur Kinloch. But the reason
behind the riot was now slowly beginning to emerge. During
the day the prisoners spokesman repeated allegations about
brutality in the prison system. This theme was echoed in the
three banners that were hanging from the upper parts of BHall. One read, in a reference to the governor, Gallagher is
14
brutality; a second read To the death and the third said Sammy
Ralston was tortured. Ralston, nicknamed The Bear and a
long-time thorn in the flesh of the prison authorities, was
convicted on a robbery charge and was serving six years. He
had previously staged a solo rooftop protest in November 86
while on remand on the robbery charge. The protestors claimed
that he had been beaten with sticks and gagged to muffle his
screams. Ralstons mother travelled to the jail to see him,
convinced that if he was alright, I could tell the boys on the
roof. She was not allowed to do so.
Whatever the truth about the treatment of Ralston it was
now the turn of the prison staff to suffer a form of torture.
During the second day of the siege, prisoners had set fire to a
mattress and yelled that they had trapped prison staff behind
the blaze. It was chilling stuff: We had them screaming for
mercy. We gave them it. We put out the fire. We wont do it
next time. The rioters then brought a succession of riot shields,
batons and a riot helmets through the hole they had knocked
in the roof and held them up as trophies. This was no doubt
an attempt to convince the press that they had won the equipment in a battle with the staff. The authorities thought the
trophies more likely came from a storeroom in B-Hall.
Rather ironically the Scottish Home Affairs minister, Ian Lang,
had been due to visit the prison that day but urgent government business took him elsewhere. However he went on TV
to say that any prisoner alleging brutality could have complaints
investigated by the police or the procurator fiscal, acting independently of the prison service. He also defended the prison
services record and said a lot was being done to rehabilitate
prisoners. He also played down the stories of overcrowding in
comments that seemed to fly in the face of the facts. On the
brutality allegations, the secretary of the Scottish Prison Officers
15
Association, John Renton, said: I ask you to consider this. Thirtyfour of my members have been injured. I have heard no reports
of prisoners being hurt. Its nonsense. So ended the second
day.
The Herald had now decided that the trouble at the Bar-L (and
Peterhead and Saughton before it) was now grave enough to
earn what the papers staff called a long leader. It was a good
one that did not miss the mark. Ian Lang was not alone in
pointing out that prisoners could complain to the police or the
procurator fiscal. The then director of the Scottish Prison Service,
Alistair Thompson, had made similar remarks at the time of
the Saughton and Peterhead incidents. To describe such remarks
as ingenuous would be charitable, thundered the paper. The
paper wanted reforms aimed not at just suppressing the recurrent violence but removing its causes. Good sound sense. To
do this, it pointed out, would be very much in the interests not
just of the prisoners but also of the prison officers and the public,
which pays 200 a week for each of the 5,000 prisoners in
Scottish jails.
On 8 January, three days after the start of the saga, it took
a sinister twist fire raising. Not this time in the prison but
at the home of an officer who had been involved in the
Peterhead siege, John Crossan. He lived just a couple of miles
from Barlinnie in Haghill. Mr Crossan, his brother and his
parents had a lucky escape. His mother smelled smoke seeping
into the flat and called the fire brigade. Officers using breathing
equipment rescued the family and neighbours across the
landing. It all highlighted the dangers, on and off duty, faced
by prison officers. Tempers were running high in the underworld as each day the papers and television showed the
dramatic scenes of the rooftop siege. John Crossan, who himself
16
judge at the trial of some of the men involved called what was
going on a torrent of violence. The photographs graphically
showed the damage smashed cupboards, a floor littered with
slates, lockers torn to bits, tea urns wrecked, furniture and
crockery destroyed. The Sunday Mail had one remarkable picture
of a hole in a wall of a cell. It had been dug out by trapped
warders terrified that they were going to be burnt to death.
Fearing berserk prisoners would set fire to mattresses placed
against the cell doors, the officers frantically tried to escape,
clawing at the walls with bare hands and makeshift tools. Their
frantic efforts were accompanied by shouts from the cons of,
We are going to get you, you bastards. This led to a desperate,
violent struggle between prisoners and guards and caused many
of the injuries sustained by the officers. A total of 34 men were
hurt, some seriously, others suffering minor injuries in what
was virtually hand-to-hand fighting. Eventually they ran to
safety through a hail of missiles thrown at them from above.
Some did not make it. They became hostages.
The release of Andrew Smith was followed late on the
Thursday with a second hostage, David Flanagan, being handed
back to the authorities as a gesture of goodwill and this was
followed some hours later with the final hostage, John Kearney,
being allowed to join his colleagues outside the beleaguered BHall. This happened after supplies of hot food and drink had
been sent into the prison for the remaining rioters, now reduced
to eleven, as four had left their redoubt earlier.
The riot was over, ending peacefully with a cuppa as the
papers said. After five days of drama and violence the end was
remarkably low key with comforting words shared over a cup
of tea with Father John McGinley. The prisoners had asked to
see a chaplain. The authorities had agreed that the protesters
would be examined medically, given access to their lawyers
22
and visits from their families. But there was to be one final act
of defiance shortly after nine on the Friday morning, the last
rump of the rioters clambered back on to the roof for the last
time to sing We shall overcome before returning to the wrecked
hall to effectively surrender.
The wonder of it was that no one had died; no one was seriously hurt. No doubt chaplains, prison officers, some of the
prisoners, and the public, who had been watching the drama
play out for almost a week, thanked God for that.
23
2
BULLY BOYS, COLD CUSTARD
AND A POWDER KEG
especially since this was still in the era of the hideous practice
of slopping out. John Renton, the respected long-time head of
the Scottish Prison Officers Association, had told the media that
overcrowding and undermanning were largely to blame for the
riot. It was a view dismissed in a radio interview by Scottish
Secretary Malcolm Rifkind who said he thought it unlikely that
the spark that started the incident was overcrowding. Politicians
of all stripes like a little spin, and Malcolm Rifkind pointed out
on the airwaves that out of a Scottish prison population of
around 5,000 or so, only around 50 were involved in trouble;
the rest were behaving responsibly. But it has to be said that
the 50 or so were doing a good job in grabbing headlines and
wrecking jails. And terrifying their captors.
Another Tory to claim that Barlinnie was not overcrowded
was Scottish Office Minster Ian Lang and he, too, was taken to
task by John Renton who said, Overcrowding is a problem
that will not go away and it is wrong of Mr Lang to say B-Hall
is not overcrowded. The mixture of short and long term and
remand inmates in Barlinnie is dangerous and can be damaging.
Frankly if the inmates are trying to demonstrate they can take
over prisons, they do not have to show us that. It is obvious
that institutions cannot be run without the co-operation of prisoners. Incidentally, the mix of convicted prisoners and untried
men played a major role in a riot in Barlinnie in the thirties, a
tale told later in this book. Another serious concern in the
prison service was over the inadequacy of training for the
countrys 2,700 officers. It was said they were being denied in
service training because of pressure of work. Disturbingly Mr
Renton said that the caring aspects of the job were being overshadowed by the custodial ones.
This argy-bargy and blaming began to obscure the fact that
the crisis in the prisons had not just jumped up and grabbed
27
Little wonder that the staff were as overwrought as the prisoners. This was a hellish place to work at that time. No surprise
then that at one stage in the actual riot an angry prison officer
confronted the press corps, who were covering the event with
millions of pounds worth of technology, and screamed, This
would never have happened if you had not been here. Why
dont you all fuck off? This loss of temper was perhaps justifiable in the circumstances at the time the angry officer said
it, three colleagues had knives at their throat. They could have
died. But did his outburst have any validity? It was a concern
that engaged the attention of Herald writer Allan Laing and
there was no doubt there was a media circus on Barlinnies
doorstep (including the Glasgow Herald it must be said).
The logistics of covering such a riot are formidable. For
example, the newspapers, radio and television had deployed
hundreds of journalists to the site of the action. The television
crews from down south, reporting back to the national networks,
had scanner trucks each worth around a million pounds. And
some of the English hacks did not take full account of the fact
that they were in the east end of Glasgow. One left a 25,000
camera in the back seat of his car covered with a jacket. It
walked, no doubt something that some of the inmates across
the road behind the walls would have found delightfully ironic.
In the previous sieges at Peterhead and Saughton, intervention
by tabloid journalists had helped break the deadlock. This time
the Scottish Office and the prison authorities seemed determined to talk themselves out of this problem on their own. In
the early days, the press circus was assembled just 100 yards
outside the walls and the prisoners could play to the crowd
asking the hacks to wave if they could hear them. And men
shouting from the rooftops politely referred to the media pack
as ladies and gentlemen. But on the second full day of unrest
29
PBB 198x129mm
7.99
17.5mm spine