The document discusses a writ petition filed by Bank of India against the State of Maharashtra regarding sealing and possession of a property. The State submitted that they have de-sealed the property and handed possession back to the petitioner. They will follow due process before taking any action for recovery. Based on the State's statement, the petition was disposed of.
The document discusses a writ petition filed by Bank of India against the State of Maharashtra regarding sealing and possession of a property. The State submitted that they have de-sealed the property and handed possession back to the petitioner. They will follow due process before taking any action for recovery. Based on the State's statement, the petition was disposed of.
The document discusses a writ petition filed by Bank of India against the State of Maharashtra regarding sealing and possession of a property. The State submitted that they have de-sealed the property and handed possession back to the petitioner. They will follow due process before taking any action for recovery. Based on the State's statement, the petition was disposed of.
The document discusses a writ petition filed by Bank of India against the State of Maharashtra regarding sealing and possession of a property. The State submitted that they have de-sealed the property and handed possession back to the petitioner. They will follow due process before taking any action for recovery. Based on the State's statement, the petition was disposed of.
h Mr.O.A.Das for the petitioner ig Mr.Kedar Dighe, A.G.P. for the State
Mr.Deepak Narayan Jadhav, Tahsildar, Labour Dues Recovery, Mumbai
H City District
Mr.Sonu Tandon for respondent no.4
y
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. ba
DATE : FEBRUARY 1, 2017
P.C.:
1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
om
2 Advocate for the petitioner filed rejoinder dated 30.1.2017. Same
is taken on record. B
3 The learned A.G.P. for the respondent State submits that pursuant to the order dated 19.1.2017 passed by this court, they have already desealed the suit property and handed over to the petitioner. He submits that as on today, petitioner is in possession of the suit property. He submits that he received instruction from his officer Mr.Deepak Narayan Jadhav, Tahsildar, Labour Dues Recovery, Mumbai City District
Mohite 1/2
::: Uploaded on - 01/02/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2017 13:54:59 :::
902 wpl153-17
who is present in court to make a statement that they will follow due process of law before taking any action against the petitioner for
rt recovery of sum of Rs.4,45,14,633/ as per the order passed by
ou Industrial Court, Mumbai in complaint (ULP) No.196 of 2016. Neither they will evict the petitioner or seal the suit property without following due process of law. Statement made by the learned A.G.P. is accepted.
C 4 In view of the statement made by the learned A.G.P. for the respondent State, nothing survives in the present petition. Hence, Writ
h Petition stands disposed of on the basis of statement made by the learned A.G.P. ig H 5 Liberty granted to the learned counsel for respondent no.4 to file their Vakalatnama within one week from today. y
JUDGE ba om B
Mohite 2/2
::: Uploaded on - 01/02/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2017 13:54:59 :::
