Scribd
Upload
47 views1 page

CAPE BMED SBAModerationFeedback Unit1 OptionB

Uploaded by

cmorris
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views1 page

CAPE BMED SBAModerationFeedback Unit1 OptionB

Uploaded by

cmorris
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FRM/EDPD/539

CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL


CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION®

MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT

BUILDING AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DRAWING UNIT 1 – OPTION B


Name of Centre: __________________________ Centre Code: ____________________
Name of Teacher: __________________________ Year of Examination: ____________________

ADMINISTRATION DETAILS COMPLIANCE WITH SYLLABUS GUIDELINES SPECIFIC COMMENTS


Yes No
Number of drawing portfolios requested: _________ Assignments tested the specific objectives in the syllabus. Yes No
Number of drawing portfolios received: _________
There were two assignments for each module in the portfolios. Sufficient portfolios were received
Portfolios were properly identified with
Assignment 4 was completed using CAD software. Assignments were completed
Mod 1 Mod 2 Mod 3
In each portfolio Assignment 4 was accompanied by a list
(i) Candidates’ Numbers There was sufficient information that
of commands, a complete drawing on A4 paper and an
Assignment 4 was CAD based
electronic copy of the completed drawing and commands.
(ii) Titles
The information about the design submitted
QUALITY OF CANDIDATES’ SUBMISSIONS
(iii) Name of Centre for Assignment 5 was adequate
Yes No
Yes No
Generally:
Drawings were neat and clean
Teacher’s marks were recorded on FRM/EDPD/393 OTHER COMMENTS

A completed Moderation Sample Form FRM/EDPD/391 Drawings had title blocks and border lines __________________________________________________
was submitted. __________________________________________________
Construction lines were shown where appropriate
APPROPRIATENESS OF ACTIVITIES __________________________________________________
Yes No The overall quality of the sample of projects submitted was
__________________________________________________
1. The assignments were relevant to the syllabus
objectives. Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory __________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
2. The assignments were appropriate for candidates
at this level. QUALITY OF TEACHER’S MARKING Yes No __________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
3. The portfolios submitted explored a variety of: 1. The CXC Mark Scheme was followed
__________________________________________________
(i) Skills/techniques
2. Marks were clearly shown for EACH of the criteria
(ii) Themes/topics __________________________________________________
set out in the marking guidelines
__________________________________________________
The teacher’s marking of the portfolio pieces was
__________________________________________________
Acceptable Severe Lenient Inconsistent __________________________________________________

Moderator’s Initials: ________________ Chief/Assistant Chief Examiner’s Initials: ________________ Examiner’s Initials: ________________ Date: ____________________________________
Revised September 2013

You might also like