0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views7 pages

PHIL 1404 Written Assignment Unit 7

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 7

Introduction

The concept of job sharing presents an innovative solution to traditional employment

models. The insightful case study serves as a foundation for this exploration. This essay aims to

dissect the intricacies of job sharing, evaluating its potential benefits and challenges for both

organizations and their employees. Additionally, it addresses the critical issue of employment

discrimination that might arise with the implementation of such a plan. The discussion seeks to

provide a balanced perspective on whether job sharing is a viable and ethical strategy for

companies, their employees, and customers in the contemporary workplace.

Points Supporting Job-sharing Plan

Job sharing, as discussed in the case study, offers several compelling advantages for both

companies and employees. This arrangement, where two or more employees share the

responsibilities of a full-time position, provides a unique blend of benefits that challenge

traditional work patterns.

From the company's perspective, job sharing introduces a range of benefits. It allows for the

recruitment of a diverse talent pool, including individuals who may not be available for full-time

work but are highly skilled and valuable (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). This diversity can bring

fresh perspectives and innovative ideas to the workplace. Additionally, job sharing ensures

continuity and coverage in work roles. If one job sharer is unavailable, the other can maintain the

workflow, ensuring that projects and tasks continue without interruption (Byars & Stanberry,

2018). This arrangement can also foster a collaborative environment where job sharers bring
different insights and problem-solving approaches, potentially leading to more creative and

effective solutions.

For employees, job sharing offers significant flexibility, allowing them to balance their

professional responsibilities with personal commitments, such as childcare, education, or other

pursuits (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). This flexibility can lead to reduced stress and a better work-

life balance. Furthermore, the shared nature of the job can lessen the risk of burnout, as

responsibilities and workloads are distributed among the job sharers (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

This not only enhances employee well-being but can also lead to increased productivity and job

satisfaction. Additionally, job sharing provides an opportunity for professional development.

Employees in a job-sharing arrangement can learn from each other, gaining new skills and

perspectives that contribute to their professional growth (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

Negative Effects on Company and Employees

While job sharing offers numerous benefits, it also presents certain challenges and negative

effects for both the company and the employees, as highlighted in the case study.

For the company, one of the primary challenges of job sharing is the increased complexity

in coordination and management. The arrangement requires extra time and sometimes additional

resources for effective coordination between job-sharing partners, especially if neither is

formally in charge (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). This complexity can lead to inefficiencies,

potential delays in decision-making processes, and increased managerial workload. Furthermore,

there is a risk of work suffering due to the need for constant communication and alignment

between the partners. This is particularly evident in roles that require continuous and seamless

execution of tasks.
Another significant challenge for companies is the potential for competitive instincts to arise

between job-sharing partners. While collaboration is the ideal outcome, there can be instances

where one partner may withhold information or even unintentionally sabotage the project,

leading to a breakdown in teamwork and productivity (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). Additionally,

companies might face the "two Mondays effect," where productivity may dip due to the time it

takes each partner to get up to speed on their first day back at work (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

This can result in a loss of momentum and efficiency.

From the employees' perspective, job sharing can also have drawbacks. One of the main

concerns is the potential for reduced benefits. In many cases, part-time positions, which job

sharing often entails, do not offer the same level of benefits as full-time positions. This can

include health insurance, retirement plans, and other employee perks (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

Furthermore, job sharing can lead to a sense of job insecurity, as part-time roles are often

perceived as less stable than full-time positions. This insecurity can be exacerbated during

economic downturns when companies might be more inclined to reduce part-time roles first.

Concerns about Potential Employment Discrimination

There are several concerns regarding potential employment discrimination that could arise

with the implementation of a job-sharing plan. Firstly, there is a risk of gender discrimination.

Job sharing is often perceived as a flexible option primarily benefiting those with family

responsibilities, who are predominantly women. This could lead to a situation where men might

be overlooked for job-sharing roles, or certain roles may become stereotypically associated with

one gender (Burlingtons, 2020).


Another concern is related to age discrimination. Older employees might be unduly

pressured into job-sharing roles as a precursor to retirement. This could be seen as a subtle form

of age discrimination, where older workers are not given the same opportunities or

considerations as their younger counterparts.

Additionally, there is the issue of unequal career advancement opportunities. Employees in

job-sharing roles might be at a disadvantage compared to full-time employees when it comes to

promotions and professional development opportunities. This could lead to a form of indirect

discrimination where job sharers, despite their competence and performance, are not considered

for career advancement at the same rate as full-time employees (Evens, 2022). Additionally,

there might be an unequal distribution of workload within the job-sharing arrangement, leading

to potential claims of unfair treatment

To address these concerns, it's crucial for organizations to develop clear, equitable policies

for job-sharing arrangements and ensure that all employees, regardless of their job-sharing status,

gender, age, or other characteristics, are given fair and equal treatment in all aspects of

employment. Training for managers and supervisors on how to effectively manage job-sharing

arrangements without bias is also crucial.

Decision Regarding Job-sharing Positions

Creating job-sharing positions can be seen as a complex decision with various implications

for the company, customers, and employees. For the company, job sharing can be beneficial as it

allows for the retention of skilled employees who might not be able to work full-time and can

lead to increased morale and productivity due to better work-life balance for employees.
Employers also have the opportunity to bring in diverse talents and perspectives, which can

enhance creativity and problem-solving within the organization (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

However, there are also drawbacks for the company. Job sharing can introduce complexities

in coordination and management, potentially leading to inefficiencies. Additionally, some roles

may not be suitable for job sharing, and there can be challenges in ensuring seamless

collaboration between job-sharing partners.

From the employees' perspective, job sharing offers greater flexibility and can significantly

improve work-life balance, which is particularly beneficial for those with caregiving

responsibilities or other personal commitments. It can also reduce job-related stress and burnout

(Byars & Stanberry, 2018). On the other hand, job sharing might lead to reduced opportunities

for career advancement and potentially lower benefits compared to full-time positions. There's

also the challenge of maintaining clear communication and effective collaboration with job-

sharing partners (Byars & Stanberry, 2018).

For customers, the impact of job sharing can vary. On one hand, it can lead to improved

customer service due to employees being more rested and motivated. On the other hand, there

might be issues with consistency in service or product quality if the job-sharing arrangement is

not well-managed.

Conclusion

The analysis of job sharing, as presented in the "What Would You Do?: Staffing Trade-offs"

case study, reveals a rewarding arrangement for companies and employees alike. While it offers

notable advantages such as enhanced flexibility, diversity, and work-life balance, it also poses

challenges in terms of management complexity, potential for discrimination, and career


progression limitations. The decision to implement job sharing must be weighed carefully,

considering its impact on all stakeholders, including the company, employees, and customers. It

is imperative for organizations to establish equitable policies and management practices to

mitigate potential drawbacks and discrimination risks. Ultimately, job sharing, when executed

with thoughtful planning and inclusive policies, can be a progressive step towards a more

adaptable and diverse workforce, benefiting both the organization and its employees in the long

run.

References

Burlingtons. (2020). Job-Sharing - Everything Employers Need to Know.

https://burlingtonslegal.com/insight/job-sharing-everything-employers-need-to-know/

Byars, S. M., & Stanberry, K. (2018). Chapter 10: Business Ethics.

https://openstax.org/books/business-ethics/pages/10-3-alternatives-to-traditional-patterns-of-

work

Evens, M. (2022). Job Sharing Pros and Cons. The Balance. (n.d.).

https://www.thebalancemoney.com/job-share-good-and-bad-1918169

You might also like