0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views7 pages

Upgrad

The document contains 5 tables that analyze industries based on factors that influence competition. Table 1 looks at rivalry among competitors in different industries. Table 2 examines barriers to exit from industries. Table 3 analyzes barriers to entry into industries. Table 4 evaluates the threat of substitutes for different industries. Table 5 considers the bargaining power of buyers in various industries.

Uploaded by

abhishekmulani42
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views7 pages

Upgrad

The document contains 5 tables that analyze industries based on factors that influence competition. Table 1 looks at rivalry among competitors in different industries. Table 2 examines barriers to exit from industries. Table 3 analyzes barriers to entry into industries. Table 4 evaluates the threat of substitutes for different industries. Table 5 considers the bargaining power of buyers in various industries.

Uploaded by

abhishekmulani42
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Table 1: Rivalry among competitors

A Attractiveness Remarks

Low High

1 2 3 4 5

No. of Large Grocery  Wide bodied Small Highly fragmented market with low
competitors store jetliner concentration

Industry growth Slow Vinyl  Internet Fast Rapidly growing industry especially
record browser post COVID

Fixed cost High Steel  Real estate Low Low incremental costs Favor
agency growth

Differentiation Low Sugar  Beer High Limited differentiation in core


offering

Switching cost Low Diskette  Software High Students can switch programs with
moderate effort

Openness of Secret Used car  Stocks Open Pricing is transparent in terms of


terms of sales published fees, but actual institutional
partnership terms are not openly
shared

Excess capacity Large Residential  Office space in Small Supply racing ahead of demand
property in South Mumbai currently
Bangalore

Strategic stakes High Internet  Part-time Low Limited financial/strategic


browser coaching investments by players

Table 2: Barriers to exit


Attractiveness Remark

Low High

1 2 3 4 5

Asset High Steel  Automotive Small Considerable investments in


specialization gears content and platform

Cost of exit High Steel  Tea stall Small Employee and marketing costs
need managing

Government High Public bus service  Grocery store Small Minimal regulatory barriers on
restrictions in UK exit

Table 3: Barriers to entry


Attractiveness Remark

Low High

1 2 3 4 5

Economies of scale Small Tea stall  Oil refinery Large Important but not very large

Product Low Sugar  Beer High Programs fairly


differentiation undifferentiated

Brand identity Low Sugar  Cigarette High Building brands takes time
and investment

Switching cost Low Diskette  Software High Students can switch with
reasonable effort

Access to channels Easy Newspaper  Petrol Limited Digital access amplifies reach
of distribution

Capital requirement Small Tea stall  Oil refinery Large Low initial, high scale-up
costs

Access to technology Easy Generic  AIDS Restricted Proprietary tech offers an edge
drugs medicine

Access to raw Easy Distilled  Ivory Restricted Not constrained by raw


material water materials

Government None Tea stall  Public bus Substantial No explicit policy protection
protection in UK

Table 4: Threat from substitutes


Attractiveness Remark
Low High

1 2 3 4 5

Availability of High Fountain pen  AIDS Low Offline Degree option


close substitutes medicine remains.

Switching cost Low Diskette  Customized High Personalized model


Software incentivizes staying

Substitute’s Better Vinyl record  Suburban Worse Competitive value


price-value trains in proposition
Mumbai

Profitability of the High Vinyl record  Trans- Low Traditional universities


producers of Atlantic flight remain profitable
substitutes

Table 5: Bargaining power of buyers

Attractiveness Remark
Low High

1 2 3 4 5

Number of Small Air bags for  Toothpaste Large Millions of potentials working
buyers cars professional buyers

Availability of Many Fountain pen  AIDS Few Offline degree options remain
substitutes medicine

Switching cost Low Diskette  Software High Personalized model builds loyalty

Buyer’s threat of High Air bags for  Cars Low Not feasible
backward cars
integration

Industry’s threat Low Air bags for  Oil refinery High Players integrating across education
of forward cars value chain
integration

Contribution to Low Low end  Semiconductor High Program quality critical for
quality packaging chips positioning

Contribution to High Housing  Paper clips Low Customers sensitive to fee levels
cost

Buyer’s Low Public bus Luxury cars High


profitability service

Table 6: Bargaining power of suppliers


Attractiveness Remark

Low High

1 2 3 4 5
Number of Small PC  Tea stall Large Dependent on few
suppliers institutional partners

Availability of Few PC  Tea stall Many Specialized faculty and


substitutes content partners required

Switching High PC  Garment Low Partnerships, platform have


cost high switching costs

Supplier’s High PC  Wide bodied Low Quite unlikely


threat of jetliner
forward
integration

Industry’s Low Petrol pumps  Garment High Institutions integrating their


threat of retailers delivery as well
backward
integration

Contribution to High PC  Low end Low Faculty and content quality


quality packaging critical

Contribution to Low Oil refining  Talcum High Faculty costs are a major
cost Powder portion

Industry’s Low Vinyl record Cars High


importance to
supplier

Table 7: Government actions

Attractiveness Remark

Low High

1 2 3 4 5
Industry protection Low Tea stall  Public bus in High No direct
UK protectionism

Industry regulation High Chemicals  Software Low Evolving


(pollution, etc.) regulation
around online
degrees

Customs and tariff High Garment  Software Low Not impacted


restrictions abroad significantly

Table 8: Overall assessment

Attractiveness Remark

Low High

1 2 3 4 5

Barriers to entry  Increasing with brand, partnerships,


platform investments

Rivalry among competitors  Rapidly intensifying competition

Barriers to exit  Employee and platform/process


investments

Power of buyers  Individual buyers weak; institutional


deals possible

Power of suppliers  Dependent on faculty and institutional


partners

Threat of substitutes  Online & offline degree options co-exist

Government action  Supportive policies so far but evolving

Overall attractiveness  Attractive growth offsets rising


competition currently

You might also like