Unit 4
Unit 4
COMMUNICATION PROCESS
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
• explain the purpose of communication;
• outline the process of communication;
• describe the media and channels of organizational communication;
• state the basic objectives of organizational communication;
• describe the intentional and unintentional barriers that prevent organizational
communication to be effective; and
• explain how a manager can make communicate effectively.
Structure
4.1 Introduction
4.2 The Communication Process
4.3 Organisational Communication
4.4 Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication
4.5 Channels of Communication
4.6 Barriers to Effective Communication
4.7 Communicating Effectively
4.8 Summary
4.9 Self Assessment Questions
4.1 INTRODUCTION
We all know that communication in an organisation is very important for its
success and growth. Communication should be effective and two ways, viz.,
from top to bottom and bottom to top. It is important that each player learns how
to communicate to seniors as well as to juniors. In fact, good communication is
the foundation for sound management. No managerial activity is possible without
communication, and a manager spends most of his/her working time
communicating. Hence, it is no exaggeration to say that communication is very
vital for every organisation and the success of an organisation largely depends
on the effectiveness of the communication system in it.
Receiving
Decoding Channel Encoding Response Transmission
Response
1) .................................................... 1) ..........................................
2) .................................................... 2) ..........................................
3) .................................................... 3) ..........................................
4) .................................................... 4) ..........................................
5) .................................................... 5) ..........................................
Decoding: Decoding and understanding the message constitute the last two
elements in the communication process. The receiver first interprets and translates
it into thoughts, understanding and the desired response. A successful
communication occurs when the receiver decodes the message and attaches a
meaning to it which very nearly approximates the idea, thoughts or information
the sender wished to transmit. This is possible when there is compatibility between
7
Organisational Processes the sender and the receiver. However, when an individual is engaged in
communication with another person of a significantly different educational or
cultural background s/he will have to put in greater effort to ensure successful
communication.
Noise: Surrounding the entire spectrum of communication is the noise that can
effect the accuracy and fidelity of the message communicated. Noise is any factor
that disturbs, confuses or otherwise interferes with communication. It can arise
at any stage in the communication process. The sender may not be able to encode
the message properly or s/he may not be properly audible. The message may get
distorted by other sounds in the environment. The receiver may not hear the
message, or comprehend it in a manner not entirely intended by the sender of the
message. The channel may create interference by ‘filtering’, i.e., allowing some
information to pass through and disallowing, others. In any case, there is so
much of noise or interference in the entire process that there is every possibility
of the communication being distorted. We shall see later in this unit why distortion
takes place and what can be done to minimize the distortion of communication.
8
An additional element in organisational communication (not present in Organisational
Communication Process
interpersonal communication) is the flow pattern of messages. Thus, there are
seven elements in organisational communication – the transmitting source; the
receiving source (the target); the transmitted message; the received message; the
goal of the message; the medium or media; and the flow pattern (which is called
network) (Figure 4.2). The transmitting and receiving sources are the people
sending and receiving the message, respectively.
ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
Transmitted
Message
Transmitting Receiving
Source Source
ORGANISATIONAL
COMMUNICATION Received
Message
Flow Pattern
Goal of the
Message
Media
Written Communication
Written communication include personal letter, memoranda, policy and procedure
manuals, and notices placed on the notice boards. Examples of oral
communications are conferences, committee meetings, telephone conversation,
loudspeaker announcements, etc. (Box 4.2). Both written and oral communication
have their merits and demerits.
As with all written communications, your e-mails should be clear and concise.
Sentences should be kept short and to the point.
This starts with the e-mail’s subject line. Use the subject line to inform the
receiver of EXACTLY what the e-mail is about. Keep in mind that the subject
line should offer a short summary of the e-mail and allows for just a few
words. Because everyone gets e-mails they do not want spam etc. Appropriate
use of the subject line increases the chances that your e-mail will be read
and not discarded into the deleted e-mail file without so much as a glance.
11
Organisational Processes
Because e-mails have the date and time they were sent, it is not necessary to
include this information in your e-mail correspondences. However, the writing
used in the e-mail should be liked that used in other business writings. The
email should be clear and concise, with the purpose of the e-mail detailed in
the very first paragraph.
The body of the e-mail should contain all pertinent information and should
be direct and informative.
Make sure to include any call to action you desire, such as a phone call or
follow-up appointment. Then, make sure you include your contact
information, including your name, title, phone and fax numbers, as well as
snail-mail address. If you have additional e-mail addresses, you may want to
include these, as well.
If you regularly correspond using e-mail, make sure to clean out your e-mail
inbox at least once each day. Of course, the exception here may be on days
you do not work, such as weekends and holidays.
Make sure you return e-mails in a timely manner. This is a simple act of
courtesy and will also serve to encourage senders to return your e-mails in a
timely manner.
Internal e-mail should be treated as regular e-mail, following the same rules
as outlined above. However, internal e-mail should be checked regularly
throughout the working day and returned in a much quicker manner as much
of these detail timely projects, immediate updates, meeting notes, etc.
Nonetheless, internal e-mails, just like e-mails, should not be informal.
Remember, these are written forms of communication that can be printed
out and viewed by others than those originally intended for.
Tips for Effective E-mail
Think before you write. Just because you can send information faster than ever
before, it does not mean that you should send it. Analyse your readers to make
certain that you are sending a message that will be both clear and useful.
Remember that you can always deny that you said it. But if you write it, you may
be held accountable for many many moons. You may be surprised to find where
your message may end up.
Keep your message concise. Remember that the view screen in most e-mail
programs shows only approximately one half of a hard-copy page. Save longer
messages and formal reports for attachments. On the other hand, do not keep
your message so short that the reader has no idea what you are talking about.
Include at least a summary (action or information?) in the first paragraph of your
message.
Remember that e-mail is not necessarily confidential. Some companies will retain
the right to monitor employees’ messages. Do not send anything you would not
be comfortable seeing published in your company’s newsletter (or your
community’s newspaper).
Do not attempt to “discipline” your readers. It is unprofessional to lose control
in person — to do so in writing usually just makes the situation worse.
Do not “spam” your readers. Do not send them unnecessary or frivolous messages.
Soon, they will quit opening any message from you.
12
Oral Communication Organisational
Communication Process
Although an organisation cannot function without written communications of
various kinds, yet a significant percentage of information is communicated orally.
It has been observed that managers spend 60 to 80 percent of their work time in
oral communication. Oral communication has the merit of being instantaneous.
Generally, the spoken word is a less complicated way of getting one’s ideas
across, if articulated well. Also, it offers the possibility of two-way information
flow, and therefore less possibility of misunderstanding. The creation of a less
formal atmosphere and generation of fellow feelings are other advantages of
oral communication.
However, the oral communication also has disadvantages. It is less effective for
presenting complicated and lengthy data. Since there is no record, it is subject to
misinterpretation and the effects of barriers arising from interpersonal relationships.
That is why while negotiating with management, unions emphasize on written
commitment.
Body gestures that “communicate” may relate to your handshake, your smile,
your eye-contact, your posture while standing or sitting, your facial expression
while listening, the shrug of your shoulders, indeed, the movement of any part of
your body. Therefore, you must be watchful of your body language so that it
does not contradict your verbal message. This is indeed difficult because the
body language is so involuntary that we are not even aware of it.
14
Formal Communication Organisational
Communication Process
An organisational chart shows the direction of formal communication flow. It
identifies the various transmitters and receivers, and the channels through which
they must communicate. The authority relationships indicate the direction of
communication flow in an organisation. A formal communication takes place
between a superior and subordinate in the form of instructions and directions.
Such a flow takes place in the downward direction.
Another formal communication takes place from the subordinate to the superior
when reporting on performance. Since the subordinate initiates communication
to the superior, the flow is upward. We call this upward communication. The
upward communication can take the form of progress reports, budget reports,
profit and loss statements, requests for grants, etc.
Finally, formal communication may also arise between the organisation and
outside parties, e.g., suppliers, customers, Government, etc. This may happen
when the management is required to provide information on certain aspects of
the working of the organisation. Communication of this kind is usually one-way.
The ‘wheel’ or ‘star’ represents an administrator and four subordinates with whom
s/he interacts. There is no interaction amongst the subordinates.
In the ‘Y’ network two subordinates report to the superior. It may be regarded as
a four-level hierarchy.
The grapevine transmits information from one person to a group of persons more
rapidly in a cluster chain arrangement. The cluster chain is made up of individuals
who act as information sources. Each individual passes the information to several
others, some of whom repeat the message to others. Some of those who receive
the message may not pass on the information to others but the information may
lead to a change in their thinking on the subject and may sometimes affect their
behaviour as well. Figure 4.4 illustrates the cluster chain network of informal
communication.
Problems in Communication
Communication may not always be effective. The main criterion to find out
whether a communication is effective or not is the fulfillment of its purpose. In
Fig. 4.3, the various purposes of communication in the four directions have been
stated. If the purpose is not fulfilled properly, the problem should be looked into.
There may be several sources of problems in communication.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
18
Organisational
4.6 BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Communication Process
The failure in communication is caused by barriers between the sender and the
receiver. To make communication effective, it must be ensured that these barriers
are removed/overcome. Now-a-days media has become very powerful only
because it has devised ways to reach the target audience. The barriers either
prevent the communication from reaching the receiver or distort it in such a
manner that it ends up either as non-communication or as miscommunication.
Since a manager has to use communication as a means of getting work done
through his/her subordinates, s/he must ensure that the barriers are minimized.
The barriers that interfere with the understanding of the communication are of
three kinds: semantic, psychological and organisational. We now discuss these
one by one.
Semantic Barriers
Most difficulties in communication arise because the same word or symbol
signifies different things to different individuals. You may recall how Shiny
Abraham was disqualified and lost her gold medal, despite coming first by a
very wide margin in the 800 m race, at the Asian Games at Seoul (1986). She
had crossed the track at the place where she should not have done. According to
her, she mistook the symbol, i.e., the colour of the flag. In our country, the red
flag indicates danger but in South Korea, white flag is used for the same purpose.
Words, action or a feeling, can have several meanings. For example, abstract
words like merit, effectiveness or responsibility, can be interpreted differently
by different persons. Difficulty in understanding may arise even in the case of
words which have different contextual meanings in different regions/countries.
To give you an example, a problem arose in interpreting the meaning of the word
‘steps’. In a training programme of health workers relating to family health in
Jamaica, this question was asked: “What are some of the steps that a mother
should take to make sure that her baby keeps healthy?” There was no response to
this question because the trainees were accustomed to only one meaning of the
word ‘steps’ based on their experience; they just could not make any sense of the
question.Semantic difficulty also arises because of unfamiliarity with words, for
example, a word of a foreign language or a technical word.
19
Organisational Processes A proposal for raising the salaries of the faculty members of an agricultural college
was under discussion. The farmers’ block was totally against giving the raise to
the college teachers – they could not see why they should pay those college
teachers $5000 a year just for talking 12 to 15 hours a week. Faculty
representatives made no headway in their negotiations until one of them who
had some farming experience, got an inspiration.
Psychological Barriers
Psychological barriers are the prime barriers in inter-personal communication.
The meaning that is ascribed to a message depends upon the emotional or
psychological status of both the parties concerned. As such, the psychological
barriers may be set up either by the receiver or the sender of the message.You
have already seen that the effectiveness of any communication depends upon the
perception of the right meaning of the message by the receiver. However, the
perception of meaning is influenced by the mental frame of the receiver at the
time the message is received. Emotions which dominate our mood at the time,
e.g., anger, anxiety, fear, happiness, etc., will affect our interpretation of the
message. The phrases ‘viewing with coloured glasses’ or ‘seeing with jaundiced
eyes’ explain vividly how our inner feelings may vitiate our perception of the
message or the situation. Post experience of the receiver in such situations would
also lead to the same effect. The same thing may happen when different individuals
interpret the same event or situation. Let us consider the case of a supervisor
watching a group of employees resting and gossiping on the lawns. How will
this situation be perceived?
To the supervisor, who believes that employees are basically lazy, the situation
communicates that they are playing truant with their work, and, therefore, should
be given more work to do and disciplined.
To the supervisor who believes that his/her workers are self-motivated and sincere,
the situation communicates that they are re-charging their batteries through
recreation and enjoyment.
You will, therefore, see that a particular kind of situation, event, happening or
words and symbols are capable of being interpreted differently by different people
20
depending on their psychological states. A receiver who is suspicious or hostile, Organisational
Communication Process
either as a consequence of his/her feeling of insecurity or because of his/her past
experience with the sender of the communication, is more likely to start ‘reading
between the lines’ and describe a distorted meaning to the message.
To the receiver’s mind a communication gets tied up with the personality of the
source. This is what some people call the halo effect. Thus, if we receive a message
from a person we admire, we are more likely to agree with it and act accordingly.
On the other hand, our immediate reaction will be one of disagreement with a
message that has been received from a person we do not like or trust. Thus, the
meaning of the communication may be coloured by our own value judgments
about the source of communication.
A receiver of communication suffers from another problem which psychologists
refer to as cognitive dissonance. Since an individual tends to be fed with too
much of information from different sources, s/he becomes selective in receiving
and responding to the communications. S/he is most likely to ‘hear’ only those
messages that conform to her/his own beliefs, attitudes and judgment.
Communications that conflict with her/his own viewpoint tend to be ignored.
Often the ‘other’ point of view may not only be ignored, it might indeed be
regarded as unfriendly or even hostile. If this happens frequently, subordinates
may start questioning whether their superior really wants to hear, opinions contrary
to her/his own. As a consequence, much of the unfavourable news in an
organisation would never get reported to higher levels until the problem has
assumed the form of a crisis.
One common phenomenon with all communications is the effect of filtering.
This effect is produced when the communication passes through a large number
of persons. Each individual through whom the information is passed interprets
facts differently, judges from her/his own point of view what is important or
relevant, and passes it on with her/his own interpretations, with the result that
the original communication gets altered in the process. The process of filtering
involves a biased choice of what is communicated, on the part of either the
sender or the receiver. Thus filtering refers to the process of ‘selective telling’ or
‘selective listening’. For example, a subordinate may tell the boss what s/he (the
boss) wants to hear. Similarly, though several factors affecting productivity in
the organisation may have been identified by the staff, yet the manager may hear
and respond only to those factors that fit in the process of communication leading
to a distortion in communication.
Organisations are particularly prone to the filtering effect. In large organisations,
filtering takes place at multiple levels. In order to save the time of the busy
executive and to save him/her from information overload, it is common in
organisations for subordinates to prepare notes or abstracts of the communication
before passing it on to the superior. The higher an information has to travel, the
higher is the degree of abstraction, with the possibility that significant pieces of
information may be entirely missed or their significance diluted or distorted.
The larger the number of filtering points in an organisation, the greater are the
chances of distortion.
Organisational Barriers
Organisations provide a formal framework through which communication is
designed to flow. The structuring of the flow itself tends to act as a barrier against
21
Organisational Processes free flow of communication between persons and levels in the organisation. Rules
may prescribe how communications are to move from one level to another in
upward or downward directions. Not only is there a possibility of delay in the
communication reaching its destination, but also there is every possibility of
communication getting distorted through the process of filtering as described
earlier. It has been found that when information is channelled through different
levels of the organisation, it alters as people interpreted facts differently. In an
organisational setting, this can be a very big problem since senior level executives
have to depend on the information and interpretations of their subordinates. A
critical information that has lost its criticality because of the actions of the
intervening levels may jeopardize the position of the manager as well as the
organisation itself.
Perhaps, you may have read that among the several characteristics of Japanese
style of management is the removal of status symbols. For example, under the
Japanese system there are no separate cabins for managers; the uniforms for
workers and managers are the same; they eat the same food in the same cafeteria.
All these are intended to reduce the gap between the workers and the managers
and bring about a better understanding of the problems of the organisation which
is the chief objective of organisational communication. In India, Infosys has
some of these practices.
22
Organisational
Activity 4: Barriers to Communication Communication Process
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
Use direct, simple language and avoid words which can have ambiguous
meanings.
Use face-to-face communication: Face-to-face communication allows more
accurate feedback to be achieved through two-way communication. Generally
speaking, people express themselves more freely while talking rather than through
writing. Face-to-face communication permits a manager to use and understand
the non-verbal signs also.
Use feedback: Feedback enables us to judge whether or not the ideas have been
received in the manner as they were originally intended. Most often it is assumed
that communication has taken place once a note has been circulated or put on the
notice board. You must devise ways to separate fact from distortion.
Create constructive environment for the expression of ideas: If you can create a
climate in which people acquire confidence that what they say will be listened to
with sympathy and considered constructively, you can be sure of a successful
and creative communication. This is, however, possible only in an environment
of trust which has to be generated by the management through its policies and
actions.
We hope that you would be able to put into practice the ideas given here and
improve your ability to communicate with your co-workers, superiors and
subordinates. On this note, we would like to end this unit and present its summary.
4.8 SUMMARY
• Communication is the transfer of information from one person to another.
Successful communication is much more than mere transfer of information
– it is the transfer of meaning and understanding between two persons.
• Communication has paved the way for modern civilization and good
communication is the foundation for sound management. No managerial
activity is possible without communication of some kind, and the major
part of a manager’s working time is devoted to communicating.
• Words either written or oral convey a very small part of the communication;
most of it is transmitted through non-verbal gestures. A manager ought to
be careful lest his/her non-verbal gestures contradict his/her verbal message.
25