Airport Operators TALPA FAQS
Airport Operators TALPA FAQS
Airport Operators TALPA FAQS
Airports
Will the FAA make available RCAM training for airport operators?
The FAA is developing training on how to use the RCAM. This training will be available
in various formats (video, DVD, webinar) in summer 2016.
What is a RwyCC?
A RwyCC is a numerical descriptor of runway conditions based on defined contaminants
for each runway third.
For what types of surfaces can the airport operator use RCAM?
A RwyCC can only be assigned to Asphalt, Asphalt-Concrete, Concrete, and Porous
Friction Concrete runways.
Where can I find definitions for the list of contaminants listed on the RCAM?
AC 150/5200-30 (as of version D) defines the contaminants listed on the RCAM.
Airport Operator TALPA FAQs Issued on June 28, 2016 Page 2 of 5
ARP
Can a new contaminant be added to the list if it is not currently listed?
No new contaminants can be added without validation. After the aviation community has
a chance to use the RCAM, the FAA will re-evaluate the list to determine if new
contaminants need to be added.
Will the FAA still allow the use of Certified Friction Measurement Equipment
(CFME)/Decelerometers for condition assessments?
CFMEs and decelerometers will remain tools in your toolbox to assist in condition
assessment for upgrading/downgrading a RwyCC and to assess braking action trends
on other airport surfaces. However, Mu values will no longer be reported via the NOTAM
system.
Will the Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) accept and distribute RwyCCs?
The ATCT will accept and distribute RwyCCs just as they handled Mu values.
Can an airport operator override the NOTAM system and change a RwyCC?
Yes, a RwyCC can be downgraded at any time; upgrades are allowed under limited
circumstances. AC 150/5200-30 (as of version D) explains downgrade/upgrade actions
the airport operator can use for RwyCCs. The NOTAM system includes protocols to
allow an airport operator to downgrade/upgrade a RwyCC.
Without the NOTAM system, how does an airport operator generate a RwyCC?
The NOTAM system called NOTAM Manager is the preferred and more efficient means
of generating a RwyCC. A secondary system that will produce a RwyCC is E-NOTAM II
(ENII), but it lacks some of the functionality that NOTAM Manager provides. The third
way is via telephone to Flight Service.
Will the NOTAM System prevent RwyCC upgrading if operational requirements for
the CFME/Decel are exceeded due to contaminant depth/type (or other
CFME/Decel limitations)?
The NOTAM system will not prevent an airport operator from upgrading a RwyCC if
operational requirements for individual assessment tools are exceeded. Protocol
prompts in the NOTAM system seek to ensure the airport operator has considered
specific items before a RwyCC can be upgraded. The airport operator should follow the
Can the code be reversed if the pilot wants to land on the opposite direction
runway?
RwyCCs are determined for a specific landing runway and direction. For opposite
direction landings, a new assessment should be made. However, RwyCCs that are
known for a specific runway may be used in the interim and in the reverse until the
airport operator completes a new assessment for the opposite landing runway.
Can a RwyCC of “0” be reported in the NOTAM system instead of directly closing
a runway?
It was the consensus of the TALPA ARC to stop operations and perform mitigating
actions on a surface that’s reporting a RwyCC of “0”. Moreover, it is current practice to
close surfaces with braking action being reported as Nil until mitigations are
accomplished to increase braking actions .
Can airports not using the TALPA process be somehow identified to distinguish
between RwyCC and Mu?
As of October 1, 2016, all Field Condition NOTAMs will use the new TALPA format.
Airports without access to either NOTAM Manager or ENII will call Flight Service to
provide their field conditions. Flight Service will originate a NOTAM on their behalf using
the new format. The only way a pilot or dispatcher would get Mu information is via radio.