Somme Project
Somme Project
Somme Project
THE SOMME?
Kacper Mejdus
Introduction
Throughout history, there are many battles that have been remembered for their splendour
or size. Some examples include D-day (operation Overlord, June 6, 1944) or Thermopylae
(480 BC). However, one battle that is etched into our memories not for its glory or length of
time is the Battle of the Somme, which is instead remembered as a grim, melancholic
metaphor of war- where the young and foolish generation is called upon by the old and
bitter and tricked into killing each other. That sometimes, one must pick the weapon up to
put the weapon down, and that deep in his heart of hearts, a soldier fights not because he
hates what is put before him, but rather because he loves what is behind him.
The battle of the Somme is widely considered a total logistical and humanitarian nightmare,
where both sides lobbed forces at one another without end, only for them to be
slaughtered. Although this myth is largely false, it does hold its roots in truth.
February 1916. France, Britain and the German Empire are fighting along 450 miles of
trenches stretching through much of Western Europe. At the same time, Germany is fighting
to the death with Tsarist Russia through frost, mud and rain. 2 years prior in the first months
of the war, Germany storms through western Europe, ending the race to the sea and
occupying Belgium in mid-October and then marches into France shortly after. This begins
the bloody stalemate known as trench warfare in which French, British and German troops
are forced to sit day after day in mud 2 metres deep while being harassed by rats, lice fleas
and disease. Artillery shells fall from the heavens without respite, and the only time this
hellish barrage pauses is for one sides soldiers to clamber over the edge of their trench and
begin the bloody slog over no-mans-land, only to be systematically mowed down by
machine gun fire. This hell would not cease until one side would overrun the other, gaining
only a few metres of ground at the cost of hundreds of young lives, irreplaceable people like
you and me who would never see their families again. In fact, during the Battle of
Passchendaele in 1917, it is concluded that for every life lost by the British 5 centimetres of
ground was gained.
In February of 1916, the British and French high commands had enough of this madness.
They decided to muster their forces for one enormous offensive to relieve the occupied
sectors of France and Belgium prised from the allies in 1914. But Germany strikes first.
On February 21st, 1916, the German army begins an offensive against the French city of
Verdun. German general Erich von Falkenhayn believed that the war would be won or lost in
France and that a war of attrition gave Germany the best chance of achieving this aim. In a
letter to German Emperor William II in 1915, he argued that Britain was the most dangerous
of all the allied powers but could not be assaulted directly as the British sector of the
Western Front was far from ideal to support offensive operations. In his opinion, Britain’s
‘real weapons’ in the war were the French, Russian and Italian armies. However, he viewed
Russia as being ‘already paralysed’ and Italy as too weak to sway the outcome of the war.
According to him, ‘only France remains.’ He concluded that an en masse breakthrough was
unnecessary and that Germany should instead bleed France out by choosing a point at
which to assault ‘which the French would be compelled to throw in every man they have.’
The fortress of Verdun along with its surrounding fortifications along the Meuse River was
selected as the focal point of this offensive as it was a major threat to the main German
communications lines and represented the leading citadel in the French front. The loss of
such an asset was expected to cripple the morale of the French army. The strategy that the
Germans would use to attack Verdun was an unending series of reserved advances that
would draw the French forces into the devastating force of German heavy artillery. The
breakthroughs themselves would be blanketed by a quick German artillery bombardment,
which was purposefully selected to be brief to encompass the element of surprise but
making up the duration with the number of guns themselves and their lightning-fast rate of
fire. By using this strategy, the German army could capture and hold their tactical objectives
before the French had any time to manoeuvre their reserves to counterattack. Command of
this operation was given to Crown Prince William, Eldest son of the German Emperor.
As early as January 1916, French airmen spotted German preparations for the Verdun
offensive and on February 11 a French intelligence officer reported unusually large build-ups
of German troops along the right Meuse bank. With this information French commanders
had to hastily bolster the line at Verdun. Since French commanders were mostly occupied in
their own affairs until this point, the moving of thousands of men and hundreds of heavy
field guns proved a massive logistical challenge. French officers had to organise a motorized
supply chain over 37 miles long which came to be known as Le Voie Sacree (the sacred way)
for its vital role in the French defence.
At 7:15am on 21st of February the Germans began a huge artillery barrage of a front about
40km long from the Bois D’Avocourt to Etain. At about 4:45m the first German infantry was
sent. The first infantry were teams of scouts who assessed the damage done by artillery and
directed more to areas which weren’t shattered. These were followed by pionieretruppen
(combat engineers) ahead of the main body of the assault. By the end of the first day,
German troops made significant gains, penetrating the French lines. On the 22 nd of February,
the Germans consolidated their gains and repelled a French counterattack. The next day the
villages of Brabant sur-Meuse, Wavrille and Samogneux were captured by German infantry.
In these 3 days the Germans had seized the first French defensive line. Both sides then
frantically reinforced their static positions. After a German attack at Samogneux was halted
by French artillery, the entire German line overrun the second line of French defences and
advancing on the key fort of Douaumont. That same evening the French commander at
Verdun, Gen. Joseph-Jacques-Césaire Joffre, the so-called ‘Victor of the Marne’ was relieved
of his duty and was replaced by Gen. Philippe Petain. With this new general came a new
army- the 2nd. On February 25th Petain was given the extremely difficult task of holding the
right bank of the Meuse. French high command declared that a new defensive line from the
East bank of the Meuse to the fort of Douaumont was to be held at all costs. However, as
the French were scrambling to reorganise this new defensive line, the Germans stormed in
and captured the fort of Douaumont, which stood undefended. With this fell arguably the
most formidable of all forts surrounding Verdun. Over the next few days, the French
defence compensated and the German advance slowed to a halt. French aircraft reclaimed
dominance over the Verdun skies and Petain deployed hundreds of brand-new heavy field
guns linked by telephone.
This slaughter continued until December 18 th of 1916. The Battle of Verdun lasted for 303
days and became known as the longest battle in modern history. It was also known as the
longest artillery barrage in modern history, with over 2 million shells being fired by each
side. With the Germans failure to make an immediate impact at Verdun, they soon realised
the British were planning an offensive at the Somme. All the while, the French stood firm at
Verdun with the slogan on ne passe pas! (They shall not pass!)
Equipment assessment
The British, French and German armies made use of a wide variety of equipment, which
undoubtedly changed the course of the conflict. These devices ranged from uniforms to
entrenching tools, the lowliest service pistol to the heaviest field howitzer. Here I will
examine the most prominent equipment used by each army, starting with France and
Britain and ending with Germany.
France
Operational structure
It is often said that the French army of 1914 was prepared for war- maybe an ordinary war
of the time, but not one the likes of the Great War. The standard unit of infantry in 1916
was the Regiment d’Infantrie (R.I.) Each one was individually numbered, and there were
173 R.I. at the outbreak of the war. A typical R.I. consisted of 70 officers and 3,400 other
men of various ranks and was organised into 3 battalions. In addition to the regimental
commander and his staff, the headquarters of each regiment included 12 scouts (on
horseback) and 120 men who formed an admin platoon. They were stretcher bearers,
armourers, cooks, sappers, etc. The R.I. was then further split into 3 battalions, each one
organised like this:
-Headquarters
-Machine-gun (MG) platoon
-Medical personnel/carts
-4 companies, each of 4 officers and 250 rank-and-file men
(A company consisted of four platoons known as ‘sections’, and in turn each platoon
consisted of 4 squads ‘escouades’.)
Each Battalion had one battalion train tagged along, which consisted of-
-1 headquarters cart
-2 light tools carts
-1 field forge
-3 meat wagons
-13 food wagons
(Note – The French army fielded no proper field kitchens in a battalion until 1915.)
Uniform
French uniform in 1914 was of a remarkable sky-blue colour called ‘horizon blue’. However,
in 1915 this colour was changed to a slightly more grey variant, but it still held the same
name. Pictured is a French infantryman with the 1915 pattern uniform.
The Lebel model 1886 rifle was the standard infantry rifle of the French army during WW1.
Designed in 1886 and entering service in 1887, it was a truly revolutionary weapon when it
first entered service. It featured a brand-new smokeless powder for the bullets which
burned hotter, faster and cleaner than gunpowder. This enabled the bullet to be more
accurate and far more powerful than that of conventional rifles. Also, when fired, it did not
produce a cloud of smoke that gave away the firers position. It included an 8 round tube
magazine with a calibre of 8mm. the bullets were stored in a tube underneath the barrel
and sported flat tops to prevent a bullet igniting the powder of the one in front of it. This
rifle might’ve been revolutionary, but by the time of the First World War it was outclassed
significantly by designs of other nations.
The ‘chauchat’ (pronounced show-sha) was officially dubbed a machine rifle, but in practical
use it was fielded as one of the worlds first light machine guns. It was the only machine gun
ever to use the ‘long recoil’ system of operation. Unlike designs which utilised the ‘short
recoil’ system like the Russian maxim machine gun, the ‘long recoil’ system required the
barrel to recoil the full length of the cartridge. This leads to a very large and cumbersome
weapon with severe recoil. If used without a tripod mount, the firer acts as part of the recoil
system, and if he moves too much, the mechanism will not function as intended and firing
will stop. Unlike its contemporaries made from wood and blued machined steel, the
chauchat was made entirely from stamped steel and turned parts. It was pioneering in
industrial design and the idea was for large quantities of these weapons to be made quickly
and cheaply in factories not created for arms manufacture.
The chauchat has a reputation as the worst machine gun ever fielded, which it does not
entirely deserve. Problems with reliability of the gun included the fact that the moving parts
were prone to expanding when heated up, thus jamming the gun. It could not fire again
until sufficiently cooled. It was the first light machine gun to incorporate a magazine feed
(albeit one which was dangerously open to the elements of the trenches) but had an
extremely low rate of fire, less than half of that of its British equivalent, the Lewis gun
(which will be covered later.) all in all, the chauchat was an essential stop-gap measure for
the allies. It is worthy to note however that nothing from the chauchat was carried over to
later designs.
The French ‘soixante quinze’ (seventy-five) was the first truly modern field gun. Unveiled in
1897, it shocked friend and potential foe alike. This quick-firing gun was designed in utter
secrecy to give the French army a winning edge in battle. The German army was a major
concern at the time but faced with the unveiling of the brand-new ‘75’, the German’s new
7.7cm Flugabwehrkanone (flak) 96 had to be rapidly modernised. The characteristics of this
excellent weapon made it the workhorse of French field artillery units during the First World
War. One feature this gun boasted was the ability to be a truly fast-firing gun. This is
because it had a hydraulic shock-absorber and air spring, which meant that the gun didn’t
have to be re-aimed after firing every shot, meaning that it could fire several shots in quick
succession. It earned the name ‘75’ due to its 75mm calibre. It was such a successful
weapon that it continued service even into WWII.
The ‘de Bange’ 155mm cannon was a French heavy artillery piece which was introduced
after the Franco-Prussian war and established the standard 155mm calibre in the French
army. The guns name ‘de Bange’ comes from its designer, Charles de Bange. In total, 1,400
guns were built by France. Most of them were placed in French forts, specifically around
Toul, Belfort and Verdun. The first series of guns featured a wooden carriage and wheels
which absorbed recoil after the shot, while later guns were made entirely out of steel. Along
with the steel chassis, a hydraulic brake was fitted which made it easier to absorb recoil and
return to a pre-shot position. Around 200 of the 1,400 guns manufactured were put in
reserve for any offensive operations during the course of the war.
Until 1914, the French army did not have any doctrines, especially for artillery. The French
high command held outlandish concepts like elan vitale, the idea that French troops could
overcome more modern firepower by their very ‘Frenchness’. This was radically changed
just before the war broke out, however. Infantry and Cavalry units had an emphasis on
speed and mobility in the field (a bit hard to accomplish in practice with the very nature of
trench warfare) while artillery had a completely opposite approach. Heavy artillery was
mainly reserved for sieges, as with their new doctrine, it was seen as impractical to wield
such heavy and cumbersome weapons with infantry. Therefore, French artillery was mainly
reserved for being stationed far behind the frontline and firing at targets kilometres away.
French field artillery groups were organised as follows-
- 3 firing batteries
- 1 HQ company
Firing batteries consisted of their own smaller sub-batteries. From now on these sub-
batteries will be referred to as ‘platoons’ to avoid confusion, although they of course were
known as batteries. Whenever the word ‘platoon’ is used referring to the subcategories,
replace it with ‘battery’.
Every battery also had its own field echelon, which was a unit that would operate behind
the front line, maintaining the guns, distributing food amongst the crews, taking care of the
animals, etc. Every platoon had its own assigned field echelon group. At this point it gets
very confusing, so here is a handy diagram.
155mm QF
platoon
Field artillery
group 155mm gun gun carriage observation
x4 x4 wagon
Headquarters
company
mountain
platoon
firing battery firing battery firing battery
4x 75mm 16x ammo 8x ammo mule to carry
16x mules tools
guns boxes carrier mules
firing
battery
field/horse
combat platoon
echelon
Operational structure
in 1914 a British infantry division consisted of about 18,100 men, along with 5600 horses, 24
machine guns, 54 light field guns, 18 medium howitzers and 4 heavy field guns. The division
consisted of 3 infantry brigades, which in turn consisted each of 4 infantry battalions, which
in turn each consisted of 4 rifle companies and 1 machine gun section. The division also had
1 cavalry section for reconnaissance, one signal company, 3 companies of field ambulances,
2 companies of royal engineers, 3 brigades of the royal field artillery, each with 3 batteries,
one brigade of field artillery with 3 howitzer batteries, and finally 1 battery of the royal
heavy divisional artillery. One noteworthy point is that there are no regiments in this
structure, and no battalions for the artillery.
One royal field artillery brigade consisted of 3 batteries, and each of these batteries had 6
field guns. In total, one royal field artillery brigade consisted of 772 men, 23 officers and 748
horses. Each rifle company consisted of 227 men.
However, in 1916 this layout was quite significantly changed. The cavalry section, machine
gun sections and royal heavy divisional artillery division were removed. These losses were
replaced with the addition of one royal engineer company, and now each infantry brigade
had one MG company had one machine gun (MG) company and one light mortar battery. In
addition, there was one company of pioneers added, 3 batteries of medium mortars and
one battery of heavy mortars. These values should be taken with a grain of salt though, as
every infantry division had their own preferences and therefore had its own slight
deviations. Here is a diagram of a standard 1916 infantry division-
infantry division
3x field 3x royal
3x infantry 3x royal field field artillery
signal company ambulance engineer
brigades artillery brigade brigade
company company
light mortar
You might see that these 3 units aren’t 3x royal field 3x howitzer
MG company connected to any other branch- that is
battery artillery battery batteries
because they were entrusted to work
independently from other units in the
4x infantry division.
battalions
Uniform
Lee-Enfield rifle
The Lee-Enfield was the standard-issue infantry rifle of British units during WW1. While not
necessarily being the most notable weapon of the war, the Lee Enfield did its job well and
enjoyed a good reputation among British soldiers. It featured a 10-round magazine and a
high rate of fire. A well-trained infantryman could achieve a fire rate of up to 12 rounds a
minute. At the battle of Mons, this quick rate of fire played to its advantage when German
troops thought they were being attacked by machine guns rather than regular rifles after
witnessing the fire rate of the Lee-Enfield. Like everything though, it did have its flaws, most
notable of which is that it was extremely prone to jamming and clogging in the battlefield as
a result of the ever-present mud. This would mean that dirt and grit would regularly become
lodged in the firing mechanism and result in misfire. One interesting fact is that although the
Lee-Enfield could hold 10 rounds, soldiers often loaded it with only 5 to reduce wear on the
magazine spring, which was very prone to damage.
The ‘Lewis gun’ was a refinement by U.S. army colonel Isaac N. Lewis, of an existing
design by Samuel McClean (another American). The resulting weapon defined the light
machine gun as a class of firearm. Regular machine guns like the French Hotchkiss could
fire faster and more accurately at range but were heavy and required a crew of men to
operate it effectively. A ‘light’ machine gun was designed to be manned by a single
soldier and take the fight to the enemy. It featured a 47 round ‘pan’ magazine fitted on
top which limited the rate of fire but made the gun much easier and simpler to operate.
The weapon was air cooled by a finned radiator fan fitted beneath a sheet metal shroud,
giving the gun its distinctive appearance. It functioned by the principle of the ‘venturi’
effect, sucking the hot air forwards and drawing cold air in behind it. This effect can be
clearly seen in high-speed video footage. A fun fact about this gun is that it was used as
a prop in the very first Star Wars film- ‘Star Wars- A New Hope’ (1984.)
The Vickers heavy machine gun was a development of the Russian ‘Maxim’ gun. It was a
7.7mm calibre weapon and was extremely heavy and large weighing in at 23kg and
having a barrel length of 72cm. In total it had a length of 1.12 metres. Due to this
excessive size and weight, it required a team of 6 to 8 men to operate to its full
potential- one fired, one fed the ammunition and the rest carried ammunition, spare
parts and the weapon itself. It had a great reputation for solidity and reliability, though.
So much so that in August 1916 during the battle of the Somme 100 of these machine
guns continued a sustained 12-hour barrage without any breakdowns. All in all, they
used over a million rounds without breakdown. It had a very distinct appearance due to
its water-cooling jacket. Cold water would flow through this jacket, cooling the barrel as
it fired, allowing for long, sustained bursts. It served on every single front of the First
War and continued service even into the 1960s.
The QF 18-pounder field gun Mk. I was the British army’s standard field gun of the first
world war, and after some teething troubles developed into a very reliable weapon. The 18-
pounder was developed after the Boer war, where the British army’s existing artillery had
proved inferior to those used by the Boers. The first completed guns were issued as early as
1904, and by the outbreak of WW1 the only change that had been made was to make the
barrel liner replaceable. The 18 pounders first went to war with the BEF (British
expeditionary force), and it became clear that each gun would fire far more shells than
initially speculated. Under the increased stress of battle the recoil springs proved to be quite
fragile and once they broke the gun was out of action until they were replaced. It had a
calibre of 83.3mm and earned its name from the weight of the shell, which weighed 18lbs
(around 9kg.) an impressive 113 million rounds of ammunition was manufactured for this
gun, with 99 million shots being fired over the Western Front.
British doctrine during WW1 was centred around ‘taking it slow.’ Infantry would march in
columns and over no-mans-land they would (in theory) march unwavering through a hail of
bullets with artillery supporting them from above. This was only in theory though as through
the crash and din of battle its not a very good idea to take a casual stroll, so many soldiers
deviated from this bizarre doctrine and opted for running instead.
Germany
Operational structure
In 1914 a German infantry division consisted of 18,000 men who were equipped with 4600
horses, 24 heavy machine guns and 72 light field guns. In terms of structure and
organisation, the division consisted of 2 infantry brigades, which each consisted of 2
regiments, which each consisted of 3 infantry battalions and one MG company. The division
also contained one artillery brigade which consisted of 2 artillery regiments which each
consisted of 2 artillery batteries. In Most cases, the division also had an engineer company, a
cavalry company and a medical company. This is quite an abstract structure though, so let’s
dive a little deeper.
Each infantry battalion consisted of 4 infantry companies. Since each division had 12
infantry battalion, this meant that in a division there was a total of 48 infantry companies. A
company consisted of 150 men in peacetime. (This was changed to 270 men when war
broke out.) This means that 12,960 men out of the 18,000 in a division served in infantry
companies. This structure changed as the war progressed, however. One notable change is
the addition of a permanent medical company and the inclusion of 3 permanent engineer
companies in 1916. furthermore, in 1916 divisions used for offensive operations (known as
Eingreifsdivisions) were issued 180 Light machine guns unlike the regular division’s 0, and
they were also issued 108 heavy machine guns unlike the regular division’s 24. However, the
number of light artillery pieces was halved from 72 to 36. Lastly, the Angriffsdivisions were
issued with 12 heavy howitzers, 18 light mortars and 6 medium mortars. (Note- mortars
were referred to by the Germans as ‘minenwerfer’, which literally translates to ‘mine-
thrower.’)
Here is a visualisation of how the 1916 divisions and Eingreifsdivisions were organised-
Infantry
division
MG 2x artillery
company batteries
3x infantry
battalions
Eingreifsdivision
2x infantry 2x artillery
regiments regiments Eingreifsdivisions
3x MG 2x artillerey
companies batteries
Uniform
German uniform during the Great War changed quite a bit during the course of the war.
Most people recognise German infantrymen as having a silly spiked helm and high boots.
Although this extremely impractical uniform was worn, it was only in the early months of
1914. Later in the war it was replace by more modern uniform and headwear designs. The
uniform of a German infantryman in 1918 would be completely unrecognisable from that of
a 1914 soldier.
The main colour for the uniform stayed essentially the same throughout the entire war-
‘feldgrau,’ or ‘field grey’ was its official designation.
Gewehr 98
After the Franco-Prussian war in 1870, cultural memory of that conflict was strong in WW1.
German fear of civilian insurgency was the cause of brutality in France and Belgium, and
France for her sought revenge over the defeat. This bitter rivalry culminated in a small arms
race between the two nations. The Prussian army adopted the single-shot bolt-action
Mauser immediately after this conflict and this was developed into what became a world
standard rifle, much like the Kalashnikov today. The ultimate variant was the Gewehr 98,
the culmination of this massively commercially successful series of rifles. It was the first rifle
to utilise the pointed ‘spitzer’ (spire shaped) or ‘S’ bullet. Unlike the flat-based bullets used
on the British Lee-Enfield, this was a very aerodynamic design which meant the bullet could
travel much faster than its contemporaries. However, it did not prove to be a revolutionary
weapon when faced against the allies. Though very large and well-equipped, the German
army lacked experience for modern warfare.
The MG 08/15 was a German built light machine gun introduced in 1915. It was also based
off the Russian ‘Maxim’ gun like the before-mentioned Vickers Mk. I utilised by the British. It
had extremely similar performance, wit one of the only performance differences being that
it used a 50-round belt. For more information, see the Vickers Mk. I.
Germany did not build its own variant of light machine gun, and so therefore it utilised
captured British and French designs like the Lewis gun, Vickers Mk. I and chauchat whenever
it was possible- and it usually was, as these weapons were seized in enormous numbers at
the beginning of the war.
Leichtefeldhaubitze (LeFH) 16
When the fluid fronts of 1914 devolved into the bloody slog of trench warfare, all sides
sought out a method to dislodge the entrenched enemy. Artillery was one such weapon and
it proved highly effective against all sorts of targets- infantry, fortifications and even the
very first tanks. As such, field guns and howitzers were ever-present in the trench lines that
began to spring up by early 1915. In 1916, the German army took on the new ’10.5cm
leichte feldhaubitze 16’ (105mm light field howitzer model 1916) series of guns. Its design is
highly classical, incorporating prominent, spoked wheels to either side of the trail. The shells
were separate loading, meaning that the propellant and charge had to be loaded separately.
Each projectile weighed in at 16.5kg and were available in HE (high explosive) or AP (armour
piercing) types. A typical crew for this weapon numbered 6 men. All in all, around 500 units
were produced over the war.
The morser 10 was a heavy howitzer used by Germany in WW1. It was designed to replace
the obsolete 21cm morser 99, which lacked a functional recoil system. It was so heavy and
cumbersome that for transport it had to be split into 2 main sections- the carriage and the
cannon itself. Before the morser 10 was commissioned for production, a small test series of
21cm versuchsmorser (test mortar) was given to the German army. These test pieces alone
exceled in the field. Around 216 of these guns were built before the outbreak of war. It was
mostly designed for sieges and not for anti-infantry use so it was equipped with concrete-
shattering shells.
Big Bertha
The Big Bertha, or Dicke Bertha in German, was a 420mm howitzer that was used to
bombard French and Belgian forts. Officially designated as the 42-cm kurze Marinekanone
14 L/12 in Räderlafette (“42-cm short naval canon 14 L/12 on wheeled carriage”), the gun
was affectionately named ‘Big Bertha’ as a single projectile fired by it completely destroyed
fort Loncin during the siege of Liege, but according to some sources, it was named Big
Bertha was used in honour of the owner of the Krupp corporation, Bertha Krupp von Bohlen
und Holbach. A total of 12 Big Berthas were built and utilised by The Germans.
The gun was designed in utmost secrecy by Germany’s greatest arms manufacturer, Krupp.
It was built in the years prior to the war for the sole purpose of shattering French and
German forts that were built of steel reinforced concrete. By the time they were finished,
the 12 Big Berthas were the largest artillery pieces used by any army on the globe. It would
fire projectiles weighing up to 810kg to a distance of almost 9 kilometres. The most
prominently used Shell type was one built with a delayed fuse that would explode once it
buried itself almost 12 metres into the earth. The gun and its carriage weighed in at a total
of 47 tons when fully assembled. They generally operated in pairs, and a single Big Bertha
was operated and serviced to by a team of up to 240 men.
A Big Bertha preparing to fire during
the battle of Verdun.
German artillery doctrine was unlike that of the French and British doctrines of the time,
favouring somewhat of a middle-ground. Whereas the British favoured an approach to
artillery that supported the infantry as they advanced and the French used artillery
exclusively for sieges, the Germans used artillery for a slightly different purpose. German
artillery was used in conjunction with infantry as they had howitzers as part of infantry
divisions, but artillery units would choose their own strategically important targets like
hardpoints or forts and destroy them independently. These targets were usually far out of
range of the infantry while they were advancing but would ultimately help infantry units in
the long run, making their job a whole lot easier when the time came to assault the targets
from the ground. Here is a quote from the German ‘Artillerie-fibel’ (artillery
handbook/instruction book) reinforcing the German artillery doctrine-
‘Commit harassing fire sadistically. Where and when would it be most unpleasant on your
own side? No regularity. Let surprise fire alternate with single shots (refeeding) by roving
guns and roving batteries.’
Switching focus back to the summer offensive envisioned by the allies, their plan is to launch
a massive breakthrough to relieve the parts of France and Belgium that were occupied by
Germany at the beginning of the war. Their plans are thwarted however, as Germany strikes
first and attacks the French at Verdun, aiming to knock them out of the war as they saw
France as ‘Britain’s greatest weapon’. France is knocked out of the summer offensive,
forcing Britain to strike alone. The objective of this offensive is also changed to relieving the
French army from the pressure of defending Verdun.
The main idea of the offensive presented by leautenant general Sir Henry Rawlinson is to
strike a 25-mile piece of land near the Somme River in July. However, the newly elected
British commander Sir Douglas Haig had other ideas. He envisioned an attack near Ypres,
where the strategic objectives were clearer and he wanted to wait till his inexperienced
units get more training. This was one of the major British breakdowns of the offensive.
Britain did not have a large standing army at the onset of the war like the other participants.
Minister for war Lord Kitchener realised that Britain required a much larger force to make
an impact on the war in Europe. He appealed for 100,00 volunteers but in 5 months over 2
million men had heeded the call. 1 and a half years later, many of them were on their way
to the Somme. Most of these units were just civilians with no prior combat experience.
Some of them hadn’t even finished their training and a lot of them had lied about their age
to get into the army. For this reason, Sir Douglas Haig wanted to postpone the offensive, but
General Rawlinson insisted.
Rawlinson’s strategy was simple. He would begin the offensive with an enormous, week-
long artillery barrage using over 1400 guns which in theory would shatter German bunkers,
kill the occupants and pulverise any defensive positions. 19 mines buried under German
strongpoints would be detonated, pulverising these forts further. After the barrage would
cease, Rawlinson would send his men to overrun the now-vacant enemy trenches and
consolidate his gains. In the North, a diversionary attack would be made at Gommecourt to
distract the Germans from the main event. With 6 weeks to go before the attack, the
previously quiet Somme sector is being transformed. Shells have to be stockpiled, roads
built, drains dug, water pipes and telephone lines laid. In his words, he wanted to ‘bite and
hold’- ‘take what the Germans have and invite them to take it back.’
‘It is capital country in which to undertake an offensive. For the observation is excellent, and
with plenty of guns and ammunition, we ought to avoid the heavy losses which the infantry
have always suffered on these occasions.’ Sir Henry Rawlinson
The barrage begins on the 24th of June 1916. British guns commence a week-long artillery
barrage firing over 1.6 million shells in its duration. This continues for the next week. This
intense shelling was expected to put the Germans out of the fight but, most of the German
troops were sitting safely in their dugouts 10 metres below ground, unharmed from the
artillery above. Although 1.6 million shells were fired, a combination of inexperienced gun
crews, faulty shells and lack of heavy guns renders the German fortifications largely
unphased. It is not until the 1st of July however that the offensive truly begins.
The attack begins at 7:30am in broad daylight, so the artillery can see what it is firing at.
British morale is high and troops are confident of victory. Many troops are about to witness
combat for the first time. The Germans have a trick up their sleeve though- from unciphered
telephone calls and captured prisoners of war (PoW’s) the Germans know exactly where,
when and how the British will attack.
1st July- timeline
7:00 am- allied artillery barrage reaches its peak.
7:20am- British detonate a colossal mine under a German strongpoint called Hawthorn
redoubt. British troops rush forward to occupy the crater.
7:28am- remaining 18 British mines are detonated under German strongpoints.
7:30am- British artillery barrage moves onto the second line as British and French troops
begin the advance through 18 miles of no-mans-land. German troops scramble out of their
dugouts and set up machine guns. In North sector, British infantry are easy targets for
German machine gunners, especially through chokepoints in barbed wire which the British
will gather at in a futile attempt to break through. The majority of them are mowed down.
Some units do manage to break through the German line and make slight gains. Near
Thiepval, the 36th Ulster division captures the Schwaben redoubt. Unfortunately, without
support on either flank they are isolated and the survivors are forced to retreat the
following night. On their right, the 32nd Ulster division captures the Leipzig redoubt, while
near La Boiselle the 34th division captures the Lochnagar crater. These are small nooks and
crannies in the German line, far short of their set objectives.
In the South, allied troops make comparatively good gains. The 21st and 7th divisions take
Mametz and cut off the heavily fortified village of Fricourt which the Germans abandon
overnight. To their right, the 18th and 30th division take their objectives, including the
village of Montauban, which is consolidated by 11am. Next to them, the veteran French
20th corps (9th and 11th divisions) achieve their first day objectives and capture 2,500
German prisoners of war. The Germans didn’t expect the offensive to extend so far south
and aren’t as well prepared in these areas. Also, in the south the British guns are boosted by
French 155mm artillery batteries which are far better at destroying barbed wire and
fortifications. At 9:30am, French colonial troops lead the attack South of the Somme River.
They take all their objectives for the day and capture 3,000 more prisoners of war. Despite
success in the south, the first day is a costly failure for the brits. German losses for the day
are estimated at 12,000 men, French losses are estimated at 7,000 but the British suffer an
estimated 57,000 casualties, 1/3 of which were killed.
‘We were told it would be a walkover, of course we might be expected to be sniped out by a
stray German, naturally.’ Private Cyril Jones. Like many others, he lied about his age to
enlist. He joined the 2nd Devonshire battalion when he was just 15. He regularly writes to
his mother and sisters back home in England. On one occasion, a chaplain asked him how
old he was, so he told the truth. The chaplain replied with ‘splendid, splendid!’
Battle of Fromelles
The battle of Fromelles was a subsequent attack on the 19 th of July to support the 4 th army
on the Somme River around 80 kilometres South. It was envisioned that the attack would
exploit any German weakening of the German line and so the preparations were rushed as
the enemy was expected to be in a weakened state. The defenders were ‘gravely
underestimated’ and the attackers were outnumbered 2:1. The attack did not achieve much,
but it was the Baptism of Fire for the Australian Imperial Force on the Western Front. The
battle is recognised as the ‘worst 24 hours in Australia’s history.’ Of the 7,080 Allied
casualties, 5,533 were taken by the 5 th Australian division. The Germans suffered 1,600 –
2,000 casualties and 150 were taken prisoner.
With the battle of Fromelles ending on the 20 th of July, the ‘First phase’ of the battle of the
Somme ends with it. From late July to September the Second phase rages on.
Battle of Pozières
The Battle of Pozières opened with the taking of the Pozières village by the 1st Australian
Division (Australian Imperial Force) of the Reserve Army, the only success in the Allied
disaster of 22 and 23 July, when a general attack happening at the same time as a French
attack further south, turned into a series of separate, isolated attacks due to communication
failures, supply failures and poor weather. German barrages and counterattacks began on
the 23rd of July and didn’t cease until the 7 th of August. The fighting ended with the Reserve
Army capturing the plateau surrounding the village to the north and east, overlooking the
fortress village of Thiepval from the back.
Battle of Guillemont
The battle of Guillemont was an attack from the 3 rd to the 6th of September on the village
which was captured by the 4th army on the first day, but British forces were forced to retreat
the following night. Guillemont was located on the right side of the British sector, near the
boundary with the French 6th army. German defences surrounded the British salient at
Delville Wood and had a clear view over the French 6 th army sector to the South towards the
Somme River. The German defences in that area was anchored on the second line and many
fortified villages North from Maurepas at Combles, Guillemont, Falfemont farm, Delville
Wood and High Wood. The battle over Guillemont was considered by some spectators to be
the strongest German effort during the Battle of the Somme. Many attempts were made by
British and French leaders to coordinate the 4 armies, but none were successful. When
allied attacks paused at the End of August, the Germans launches their largest counterattack
in the Battle of the Somme.
Battle of Ginchy
On the 9th of September, the British 16th division captured the German village of Ginchy,
which is located 1.5km north-east of Guillemont, at the junction of 6 roads on a high-set
position overlooking Combles, 4km to the south-east. After the Battle of Guillemont ended,
British troops were required to advance to positions which would give the British an
advantage of observation over the German 3rd line in preparation for a general attack in
mid-September. British assaults from the Leuze Wood going North to Ginchy had begun on
the 3rd of September, when the 7th division captured the village but was forced out by a
German counterattack. The capture of Ginchy and the successful advance of the French 6 th
army on the 12th of September (the largest French attack during the Battle of the Somme)
enabled both armies to vastly increase the size and magnitude of their attacks which
brought many successes throughout the month.
The battle of Flers-Courcelette was a largely unremembered part of the battle of the
Somme. It was the third and final offensive mounted by the British army which attacked an
unofficial line and the German 3rd line to take Morval, Lesboeufs and Gueudecourt, which
was combined with a French assault at Fregicourt and Rancourt to surround Combles and
mount a supporting attack along the South bank of the river Somme. Even though the
official objective of the breakthrough was not achieved, strategic gains were significant- the
front line was advanced by around 2.3-3.3 kilometres and many casualties were inflicted
upon the Germans. However, there is one thing very significant and special about this battle.
It was the dawn of a new age of warfare which would change the way wars were to be
fought in the future. This innovation was, of course, the introduction of tanks.
Tanks in the First World War weren’t those that we would recognise today. They were built
for very specific strategic requirements and therefore were extremely specialised, unlike
modern designs which aim to be used for as many purposes as possible. They were designed
to be very long to be able to cross trenches without falling into them. Popular opinion
presents this vehicle as being a miracle weapon that saved the allies from the Germans- this
could not be further from the truth. The first tanks were a nightmare for the maintenance
crew and engineers- the engine was just about powerful enough to pull the 28 ton machine
along, the tracks were prone to breaking and much of the external space was crammed with
return rollers to accommodate the tracks. It wasn’t much better for the crew. Since there
was no ventilation and the engine was uncovered, it was sweltering hot on the inside.
Temperatures could reach up to 50 degrees on the inside of the vehicle. In addition, the lack
of ventilation meant that often crew members would pass out due to lingering gun fumes.
Furthermore, the tank lacked any sort of suspension system, meaning that it would be a
rather rough ride for the crew.
The tank mark I had quite a secretive initial production. The name ‘tank’ was chosen as a
codename to protect its true identity from the Germans. It came from the fact that they
were masqueraded as vehicles carrying water tanks in any official documents or messages.
In addition, the tank crews didn’t even know what role they signed up for prior to the
unveiling of the tanks. The first tank brigade was called the Heavy Machine Gun Corps and
was a branch of the machine gun corps. This decision was made to preserve secrecy of this
project.
The first tank- the Mark I- came in 2 ‘genders’- male and female. The male variant was one
which carried 2 6-pounder naval guns used for destroying enemy bunkers and fortifications.
Along with that it also carried 3 machine guns- 2 facing the sides and rear and one facing
forward. The female variant swapped the 6-pounder guns for 2 extra machine guns facing
forward and to the sides. these 2 variants were made to be used in conjunction with one
another. In a typical group of British tanks there would be 2 females and one male- the
females would protect the male from enemy infantry while the male would bide its time
destroying enemy fortifications. The tanks were all but invulnerable to enemy small-arms
fire, as they had 10mm of armour all around. (Nowadays that is considered practically
nothing, but during WW1 it would protect the crew from most weapons available at the
time.) there were only 2 weapons that a tank could fear in 1916- machine gun bullets and
artillery. Later in the war the Germans manufactured specific anti-tank ammunition for their
rifles, but this was only introduced in 1917.
A mark I. tank on September 15,
1916- the very first time tanks were
used in combat.
Battle of Morval
The Battle of Morval was an attack followed through by the 4th Army on Morval,
Gueudecourt and Lesboeufs which were held by the German 1st Army. These 3 villages
were the final objectives of the battle of Flers-Courcelette. The attack was postponed to
rendezvous with the French Sixth Army on Combles (south of Morval) and because of rain.
The combined attack was also intended to cut off the German positions westward (near
Thiepval) of reinforcements, before an attack by the Reserve Army, scheduled on the 26 th of
September. Combles, Morval, Lesboeufs and Gueudecourt were captured and a small
number of tanks joined in the battle later in the afternoon. Many casualties were inflicted
on the Germans but the French weren’t as successful as the British. The 4 th Army’s advance
on the 25th of September was its deepest since 14 July crippled the Germans in some places,
particularly in a salient near Combles. The Reserve Army’s attack began on the 26 th of
September in the Battle of Thiepval Ridge.
Battle of Thiepval
The Battle of Thiepval Ridge was the first en masse offensive mounted by the Reserve Army
led by Lieutenant General Hubert Gough and was intended to exploit the 4 th Army’s attack
at Morval 24 hours afterwards. Thiepval Ridge was well fortified and the German defenders
fought with great determination and courage, while the British coordination of infantry and
artillery broke down completely after the first day due to frantic fighting in the labyrinth of
trenches, dug-outs and shell-craters. The last British objectives were not captured until the
Battle of the Ancre Heights (1st of October – 11th of November). Organisational difficulties
and fast deteriorating weather ruined Joffre's intention to continue by vigorous coordinated
attacks by the allied armies, which separated and declined in effectiveness during late
September, at the same time as a revival occurred in the German defence. The British
experimented with new techniques in gas warfare, machine-gun bombardment and tank–
infantry cooperation, as the Germans struggled to survive the flood of men and material
fielded by the allies, despite reorganisation and significant reinforcements of troops,
artillery and aircraft from Verdun. September became the worst month for casualties for the
German army.
Wartime Heroes
During the battle of the Somme, there were many people who did truly heroic deeds and
should rightly be recognised as heroes. Some of them are quite famous in popular opinion,
while others are less known. That doesn’t make their deeds any less amazing. Even those
that were fighting on the side of the enemy- may that be Germany or any of its allies- it is
important to remember that these men were only fighting for their country at the time like
any soldier on our side would. Therefore, their heroic actions and deeds will be mentioned
exactly like those of Britain and its allies.
Lieutenant general Sir Adrian Paul Ghisliain Carton de Wiart was a British army officer who
fought during the Battle of the Somme. He was born in Brussels, Belgium on the 5 th of May
1880 to an aristocratic family. He spent his early days in Belgium and in England, but after
his parents divorced in 1886, him and his father moved to Cairo so his father could practice
politics in Egypt’s mixed courts. Through this he was connected to the Egyptian inner circles
and soon learnt how to speak Arabic.
He joined the British army at the time of the Second Boer War at around 1889, where he
entered the false name of ‘trooper Carton’ claiming to be 25 years old, when in fact he was
no older than 20. Early during this conflict, he was wounded in the stomach and groin and
had to be sent back to England. His father was furious when he found out that his son had
‘abandoned’ his duty but allowed him to remain in England. After a brief time at Oxford with
his friends, he was given a role in the 4th Dragoon guards. He fought in South Africa for a
second time before being transferred to India in 1902. His wound obtained in the Boer war
instilled into him a strong desire to be physically fit. His hobbies were mostly athletics,
sports and hunting among other physically demanding activities. According to his friends, he
was "a delightful character and must hold the world record for bad language."
When WW1 broke out, he was en route to British Somaliland where a low-level war was
underway against the followers of Dervish leader Mohammed bin Abdullah called the ‘mad
Mullah’ by the British. He was put into the Somaliland Camel corps as a staff officer. Carton
de Wiart was shot twice in the face during this conflict, once through the eye and once
through the ear.
In February 1915, he took a ferry to France. He took part in the fighting on the Western
front, taking command of 3 battalions and a brigade. He was wounded seven more times
during the first world war, losing his left hand in 1915, biting off his fingers in a medical
camp when a doctor refused to amputate them, shot through the skull and ankle during the
battle of the Somme, through the hip at the battle of Passchendaele, through the leg at the
battle of Cambrai and through his other ear at Arras. He was awarded the Victoria cross
after the war and received a newspaper article about his story in 1916-
For most conspicuous bravery, coolness and determination during severe operations of a
prolonged nature. It was owing in a great measure to his dauntless courage and inspiring
example that a serious reverse was averted. He displayed the utmost energy and courage in
forcing our attack home. After three other battalion Commanders had become casualties, he
controlled their commands, and ensured that the ground won was maintained at all costs.
He frequently exposed himself in the organisation of positions and of supplies, passing
unflinchingly through fire barrage of the most intense nature. His gallantry was inspiring to
all.
— London Gazette, 9 September 1916
He went on to fight in WW2, fighting during the invasion of Poland 1939, fighting in Norway
in 1940, fighting with Yugoslavian partisans in 1941, fighting in Italy and landing in a prisoner
of war camp (from which he escaped by digging a tunnel under its walls,) and finally in China
from 1942 to 1947. He retired in October 1947 and died on June 5 th, 1963. He received the
following military honours-
- Victoria cross
- Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire
- Companion of the Order of the Bath
- Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George
- Companion of the Distinguished Service Order
- Queens South Africa Medal
- Africa General Service Medal
- 1914 Star
- British War Medal
- Victory Medal (United Kingdom)
- 1939-1945 Star
- Africa Star
- Italy Star
- Burma Star
- War Medal 1939-1945
Painting of Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart
- King George VI Coronation Medal by Sir William Orpen, 1919
- Queen Elizabeth II Coronation Medal
- Officer of the Order of the Crown (Belgium)
- Croix de Guerre 1914-1918 (Belgium)
- Silver Cross (Knight) of the Order of Military Virtue of Poland
- Cross of Valour (Poland)
- Commander of the Legion of Honour of France
- Croix de Guerre 1939-1945 (France)
Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart is remembered after his death as the ‘unkillable soldier’ because
of the number of times he had been shot and survived- 23 times in total. He had been shot
in the groin, stomach, through the eye, through both ears, in the skull, ankle, thigh, hip and
leg and had his left hand blown off by artillery and bit off 3 of his fingers after a doctor
refused to amputate them. On his grave is written probably his most famous quote about
the First World War- ‘Frankly, I enjoyed the war.’
Manfred von Richthofen
Manfred Albrecht Freiherr von Richthofen, known in English as Baron von Richthofen or the
Red Baron, was a fighter pilot with the German air force during WW1. He is considered by
many as the ace-of-aces of the First World War. He was in fact the highest-scoring ace of the
war, being officially credited with 80 air combat victories.
Manfred was born in Kleinberg, near Breslau, Lower Silesia (now part of the City of
Wrocław, Poland) on 2 May 1892 into a prominent Prussian Aristocratic Family. His father
was Major Albrecht Philipp Karl Julius Freiherr von Richthofen and his mother was
Kunigunde von Schickfuss und Neudorff. After being educated at home he attended a school
at Schweidnitz for a year before undertaking cadet training at the Wahlstatt military school
when he was 11. After completing the cadet training in 1911, he joined an Uhlan cavalry
unit, the Ulanen-Regiment Kaiser Alexander der III. von Russland (1. Westpreußisches) Nr. 1
("1st Emperor Alexander III of Russia Uhlan Regiment (1st West Prussian)") and was
assigned to the regiments 3rd squadron.
When WW1 began, Richthofen served as a cavalry reconnaissance officer on both the
Eastern and Western Fronts, seeing action in Russia, France and Belgium. However, with
trench warfare taking up most of the Western Front, cavalry operations were deemed
outdated and obsolete. With this change he was transferred to a unit of telephone
operators and dispatch runners. He was very disappointed and bored with this change, but
an even harder blow came when he was assigned to the supply branch. His interest in
aircraft was born however when he examined a German aircraft behind the frontline. With
this revelation he appealed for a transfer to the German air force. It is said that in his
application letter for the transfer he wrote "I have not gone to war in order to collect cheese
and eggs, but for another purpose." His request was granted and he joined the air force in
May 1915.
He began his training as a fighter pilot in October 1915. In February 1916, Manfred ‘rescued’
his brother Lothar from the boredom of being a troop instructor in Luben and urged him to
become a fighter pilot. The next month Manfred joined the 2nd Bomber squadron flying a 2-
seater aircraft over Verdun. He shot down a French aircraft over Fort Douaumont, but again
this kill wasn’t confirmed.
After his experience at Verdun, he gained the controls of a fighter aircraft and flew over big
battles like the Somme and Cambrai. On September 17, 1916, he gained his first aerial
victory after he shot down a British aircraft. His autobiography states that he “honoured the
fallen enemy by placing a stone on his beautiful grave." He continued this practice until he
had 60 such silver cups.
The Red Baron that is known widely by many types of medias only rose to prominence in
late 1917, after the Somme. From July 1917, he flew his most famous aircraft- the all-red
Fokker Dr.1 triplane. He became the commander of his squadron in late 1917. At this point,
he took the flamboyant step of painting his aircraft all red. His autobiography states-
"For whatever reasons, one fine day I came upon the idea of having my crate painted glaring
red. The result was that absolutely everyone could not help but notice my red bird. In fact,
my opponents also seemed to be not entirely unaware (of it).”
With this step, his squadron followed his lead and also painted their aircraft bright colours-
first red, then bright colours like yellow, blue, pink and purple. This is where his squadron
earns its name- the ‘flying circus.’ This state of flamboyant fame would not last though.
Manfred von Richthofen received a fatal wound just after 11:00 am on 21 April 1918 while
flying over Morlancourt Ridge near the Somme River.at the time, he had been pursuing a
British Sopwith Camel Biplane at very low altitude and at very high speed. The British
aircraft had been piloted by Canadian novice pilot Wilfrid Reid May of No.2 09 Squadron of
the RAF. May had just fired on his cousin, Wolfram von Richthofen. On seeing his cousin
attacked, Manfred flew to his rescue and fired on May, causing him to pull away. Richthofen
pursued May across the Somme battlefield. Manfred was spotted and attacked by May’s
school friend and flight commander, Arthur ‘Roy’ Brown. In this final stage of the chase, a
single .303 bullet hit Richthofen through the chest, severely injuring his heart and lungs. His
aircraft stalled and veered sharply for the ground, hitting the ground on a hill near the Bray-
Corbie road, just north of the village of Vaux-sur-Somme.
He was recognised as a Hero in Germany, and when asked why he risked his life I the air, he
replied with ‘I risk my life in the air so that the soldier in the trenches may have an easier lot
in life.’ He received the following military awards in his lifetime-
- Prussian Military Pilot Badge
- Honour Goblet for the Winner of Air Combat
- Iron Cross, 1st Class (10 April 1916), 2nd Class (23
September 1914)
- Duke Carl Eduard Medal with Sword Clasp (9
November 1916)
- Knight's Cross of the Royal House Order of
Hohenzollern with Swords (11 November 1916)
- Pour le Mérite (12 January 1917)
- Knight's Cross of the Military Order of St. Henry (16
April 1917)
- Order of the Red Eagle, 3rd Class with Crown and
Swords (2 April 1918)
- Knight's Cross of the Saxe-Ernestine House Order, 1st
Class with Crown and Swords
Manfred Albrecht Freiherr von Richthofen
- Military Merit Order (Bavaria) 4th Class with Swords
- Knight's Cross of the Württemberg Military Merit
Order
- Hessian Bravery Medal
- Cross for Faithful Service
- Lippe War Merit Cross, 2nd Class
- Cross of War of Honour for a Heroic Deed
- Brunswick War Merit Cross, 2nd Class
- Wound Badge, 3rd Class (1918)
- Hanseatic Crosses of the Three Hanseatic Cities of Bremen, Hamburg, and Lübeck
- Order of the Iron Crown, 3rd Class (Austro-Hungary)
- Austro-Hungarian Military Merit Cross, 3rd Class with War Decorations
- Field Pilot Badge (Austria-Hungary)
- Iron Crescent (Ottoman Empire)
- Silver Imtiyaz Medal (Ottoman Empire)
- Silver Liakat Medal (Ottoman Empire)
- Military Order for Bravery, 4th Class (12 June 1917) (Kingdom of Bulgaria)
Conclusion
The battle of the Somme is largely remembered as a total logistical and military failure for all
sides. Though that reputation is not entirely without reason, it is quite a large over-
exaggeration. That is to say that it wasn’t one of the deadliest battles in history though- all
in all, there were 430,000 British casualties, 200,000 French casualties and 450,000 German
casualties.
War has a tendency to do something that nothing else in the world can- It brings out the
worst of human nature. The raw, rotten, greedy side of our souls, where all humanity is
forgotten in favour of greed, selfishness and material gain. Obviously, war is not a good
thing by any stretch of the imagination, but it also has another unique side effect- It brings
out the best in people, the unwavering courage, unimaginable kindness, empathy and
compassion from one human being to another, where one would happily forsake their
safety, comfort and life in order to ensure those values are granted to another individual or
a larger community. It brings people together for one common cause and sets all
disagreements aside in favour of a larger common goal.
Although eliminating war from our world is the ultimate goal, this is a utopian dream and is,
sadly, impossible to accomplish. However hard we try, we cannot erase war as a whole from
society. War will evolve and change forms as time goes by, and although we cannot
eradicate it completely, one thing we can do is never forget the heroes who died so that we
might live.