0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views2 pages

Operator Presedence & Associative

Uploaded by

Koushal Yadav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views2 pages

Operator Presedence & Associative

Uploaded by

Koushal Yadav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
ar1222, 814 PM r+ Operator Precedence -eppreterence.com C++ Operator Precedence ‘The following table lists the precedence and associativity of C++ operators. Operators are listed top to bottom, in descending precedence, Precedence Operator Description ‘Associativity 2 Scope resolution Left-to-right > an as Suffixipostfix increment and decrement type() type(} Functional cast 2 ao Function call all Subscript > Member access Ha Prefix increment and decrement Right-to-left = faa Unary plus and minus a Logical NOT and bitwise NOT (type) style cast a Indirection (dereference) a sa Address-of sizeof Size-ofnate 1) co_await await-expression (c++20) new new(] Dynamic memory allocation delete delete!) Dynamic memory deallocation 4 od Pointer-to-member Left-to-right > 5 _atb a/b ab Multiplication, division, and remainder 6 at ab Addition and subtraction 7c Bitwise left shift and right shift Cod ‘Three-way comparison operator (since C20) 9 For relational operators < and = and > and = respectively 10 For equality operators = and # respectively 1 Bitwise AND 2 Bitwise XOR (exclusive or) 13 Bitwise OR (inclusive or) 14 Logical AND 1s Logical OR arbic ‘Ternary conditionailnote 2] Right-to-left« throw throw operator co_yield yleld-expression (¢++20) 16 Direct assignment (provided by default for C++ classes) ‘Compound assignment by sum and difference Compound assignment by product, quotient, and remainder: Compound assignment by bitwise left shift and right shift ‘Compound assignment by bitwise AND, XOR, and OR 7, Comma Left-to-right > 1.1 The operand of sizeof can't be a Cstyle type cast: the expression sizeof (int (sizeoflint)) * p), but not sizeof ((int)=p) 2.1 The expression in the middle of the consitional operator (between 7 and :) is parsed as if parenthesized: its precedence relative to 72 is ignores, * is unambiguously interpreted as When parsing an expression, an operator which is sted on some row of the table above with a precedence will be bound tighter (as if by parentheses) to its arguments than any operator that is listed on a row further below it with a lower precedence. For example, the expressions std::cout << a & b and “pi+ are parsed as (std::cout << a) & b and *(pr+) ,andnotas std::cout << (a & b) or (*p)++ Operators that have the same precedence are bound to their arguments in the direction of their associativity, For ‘example, the expression a = b= c isparsedas a= (b= c) ,andnotas (a = b) = c because of right-to-left associativity of assignment, but a +b - ¢ isparsed (a +b) - ¢ andnot a+ (b - c) because of left-to-right associativity of addition and subtraction nce 12 hitpsien.cppreference.comwlepplanguageloperator_precs ar1222, 814 PM r+ Operator Precedence -eppreterence.com ‘Associativity specification is redundant for unary operators and is only shown for completeness: unary prefix operators always associate right-to-left (delete ++*p is delete(++(*p)) ) and unary postfix operators always associate left- to-right ( a[1](2]++ is ((a[1]) (2])++ ). Note that the associativity is meaningful for member access operators, ‘even though they are grouped with unary postfix operators: a.b++ is parsed (a.b)++ and not a. (b++) Operator precedence is unaffected by operator overloading. For example, std::cout << a? b : ¢;) parses as (std::cout << a) 7 b : c; because the precedence of arithmetic left shift is higher than the canditional operator. Notes Precedence and associativity are compile-time concepts and are independent from order of evaluation, which is a runtime concept ‘The standard itself doesn't specify precedence levels. They are derived from the grammar. const_cast, static_cast, dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, typeid, sizeof..., noexcept and alignof are not included since they are never ambiguous. Some of the operators have alternate spellings (e.9., and for &&, or for ||, not) for, etc.) Inc, the ternary conditional operator has higher precedence than assignment operators. Therefore, the expression e = a

You might also like