265-270 JPTCP+March+0016

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Population Therapeutics

& Clinical Pharmacology


RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI: 10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.13.026

Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and


Solid Dosage Form
Khaldoon S. Alhadad1, H. N. K. AL-Salman*2
1,2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Basrah, Iraq.
*Corresponding Author: H. N. K. AL-Salman, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
College of Pharmacy, University of Basrah, Iraq. Email: [email protected]

Submitted: 24 March 2023; Accepted: 10 April 2023; Published: 13 May 2023

ABSTRACT
AIM- Two straightforward and touchy RP-HPLC techniques for the quantitative estimation of
Glimepiride in mass and drug portion structures have been contrived in this review. MATERIAL
& METHODS- Glimepiride was resolved utilizing a RP-HPLC technique using a C-18 evenness
section and a portable period of methanol: phosphate support pH 4.0 (50:50 V/V). The versatile
stage was siphoned at a pace of 0.5 ml/min, and the location was done at a frequency of 239 nm.
RESULTS- 2.470 minutes was discovered to be the retention time. Linearity, Accuracy,
Precision, System Suitability, LOD, LOQ, Ruggedness, and Robustness are all validated for this
approach. The proposed method is an excellent way to get accurate results and has been
demonstrated to be suitable for regular Glimepiride analysis in bulk and dose forms.
CONCLUSION- The method was used to find out how much of a compound was included in
commercial pharmaceutical dosage forms. The approach is straightforward, repeatable, and
accurate, and it is a better option for routine quality control than other chromatographic
techniques.

Keywords: RP-HPLC Method, Estimation of Glimepiride, Bulk & Solid Dosage Form, Linearity,
Accuracy, Precision, System suitability

INTRODUCTION is the most broadly utilized insightful


HPLC is the most adaptable and generally innovation [1, 2]. HPLC works by
utilized chromatographic procedure. It is an constraining dissolvable through shut sections
actual division procedure in the fluid stage containing tiny particles under high tension,
where an example is isolated into its bringing about high goal detachments. In a
constituent parts (or analytes) by conveying scope of natural, inorganic, and organic
between the portable stage (a streaming fluid) materials, the system is utilized to isolate and
and the fixed stage (a fixed strong) (sorbents decide species. The motivation behind this
pressed inside a segment). A web-based study is to make an UV/noticeable
identifier creates a chromatogram by checking Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC technique
the centralization of each isolated part in the for assessing Glimepiride in mass and drug
segment gushing. For the quantitative definitions [3-6].
examination of drugs, biomolecules,
polymers, and other natural substances, HPLC
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e265
6
Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and Solid Dosage Form

MATERAIL & METHODS channel paper was utilized to channel the


We concocted a straightforward and delicate RP- resultant arrangement [10].
HPLC technique for quantitative estimation of Columns must be cleaned
Glimepiride in mass medications and drug plans Molding of the segments was performed before
in the ongoing review. to the following HPLC show to streaming HPLC
Chromatographic system and conditions grade methanol through them at a stream pace of
The proposed procedure was carried out under 1 ml/min for 30 minutes. In order to erase any
the aforementioned chromatographic conditions. remainders of the earlier run that might be
Mobile phase selection available in the segment.
Glimepiride was put into the HPLC system as a Mobile phase loading
pure drug and ran in various solvent systems. In The pipe was filled with filtered and degassed
order to discover the optimal conditions for the mobile phase. Each channel was primed
separation of Glimepiride, different portable separately with newly prepared mobile phase.
stages, for example, methanol and water, Validated RP-HPLC method
methanol and different phosphate cushions with An insightful technique's approval is the most
pH of 6, 5.5, and 3.5 were investigated. In common way of laying out through research
comparison to other mobile phases, methanol and facility examinations that the strategy's
potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer exhibition trademark meets the prerequisites for
(pH: 4) yielded good results. At long last, the expected logical application. Analytical
methanol and phosphate cushion were parameters are used to express performance
demonstrated to be the best versatile stage parts characteristics [11, 12].
(pH: 4). The medication had high resolution, a Linearity
moderate retention period, and adequate peak Proper aliquots of standard Glimepiride stock
symmetry in this mobile phase [7]. arrangements (100 g/ml) were set in different 10
Preparation of phosphate buffer ml volumetric flagons, and the subsequent
7.0 gm KH2PO4 was weighed into a 1000 ml arrangement was weakened sufficient with
volumetric flask, dissolved, and diluted with diluent to get a last centralization of 10-50 g/l.
HPLC water to 1000 ml. Ortho phosphoric acid The chromatographic apparatus was injected
was used to get the pH to 4.0 [8]. with these solutions. The Glimepiride calibration
Preparation of mobile phase curve was created by graphing peak area vs.
Blend 500 mL of the previously mentioned Glimepiride applied concentration [13].
cushion (half) with 500 mL of methanol HPLC Precision
(half) and degas in a ultrasonic water shower for Between day and intra-day difference tests
5 minutes. Under vacuum filtration, channel demonstrated the technique's accuracy. Six
through a 0.45 channel [9]. rehashed infusions of standard arrangement were
Preparation of working standard stock solution done in the intra-day tests, and the reaction
Around 10 mg of Glimepiride was painstakingly component of medication pinnacle and percent
gauged and disintegrated in 50 ml of methanol in RSD were determined. A chromatogram was
a 100 ml volumetric jar, then, at that point, shown. Six rehashed infusions of standard
weakened to the ideal focus with methanol. arrangement were finished six successive days in
Whatman channel paper No. 41 was utilized to the between day variety preliminaries, and the
channel the subsequent arrangement. reaction component of meds pinnacle and
Sample Solution Preparation percent RSD were figured. The made technique
Twenty tablets were painstakingly pummeled was viewed as exact in light of the information
and unequivocally weighted. In a 100 ml got [14].
volumetric flagon containing methanol (around Accuracy
50 ml), tablet powder comparable to 10 mg of The method's accuracy refers to how near the test
Glimepiride was broken down by sonication and findings are to the genuine value. Twenty tablets
separated utilizing Whatman channel paper (No. of each formulation were weighed and
41). The filtrate was gathered by washing the pulverised, and the results were analysed to see
channel paper with extra dissolvable. To how accurate they were. Recuperation
accomplish a centralization of 100 g/ml, the examinations were led out utilizing the standard
filtrate volume was changed in accordance with option strategy, which included adding a known
the imprint with a similar dissolvable. Whatman measure of standard medication answer for the
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e266
6
Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and Solid Dosage Form

example arrangement (50, 100, and 150 percent).


Limit of detection (LOD)
Utilizing the made RP-HPLC technique, the
fostered strategy's Limit of Detection not entirely
set in stone by infusing progressively lower
measures of standard arrangements. The LOD is
the analyte focus at which a perceptible reaction
can be gotten (sign to commotion proportion of
3:1) [15, 16].
Limit of quantitation (LOQ) FIGURE 2: RP-HPLC Calibration curve of
The LOQ values were derived using a three-fold Glimepiride
multiplication method based on the LOD
strength.
Ruggedness
Glimepiride tests weighing 10 mg were gauged
and broken down in a 100 ml volumetric cup
containing portable stage (50 ml), then sonicated
for 30 minutes prior to making the last volume
with versatile stage. 3 ml of the standard stock
arrangement was pipette out and saved into a 10
ml volumetric cup, which was then loaded up
with versatile stage to the ideal volume. FIGURE 3: Overlain chromatogram of
Infusions of the examples were made into the Glimepiride by RP-HPLC method
segment [15].
Robustness
Various technique boundaries, for example, pH,
stream rate, segment temperature, infusion
volume, and versatile stage creation, are changed
inside a practical reach to test a strategy's vigor,
and the quantitative impact of the not set in
stone. There were no massive changes in the
chromatograms, exhibiting the heartiness of the
RP-HPLC strategy laid out [16]. FIGURE 4: Chromatogram of precision

RESULTS

FIGURE 5: Chromatogram of standard drug i.e.


Glimepride solution

TABLE 1: Adjustment information of


FIGURE 1: Standard HPLC Chromatogram of
Glimepiride by RP-HPLC strategy
Glimepiride at 239 nm S. No. Concentration (µg/ml) Area
1 0 0
2 10 10734
3 20 21576
4 30 32967
5 40 43029
6 50 54803

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e267
Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and Solid Dosage Form

TABLE 2: Glimepiride characterization parameters


Parameter RP-HPLC
Calibration range (µg/ml) 10-50
Detection wavelength (nm) 239
Mobile phase (methanol: 0.051 M) phosphate 50:50
buffer) (v/v; pH: 4.0)
Retention time (min) 2.470±0.035
Regression equation (Y*) Y=109290 X -17080
Slope (m) 109293
Intercept (c) -17082
Correlation coefficient (r2) 0.9961
Limit of detection (µg/ml) 0.02
Limit of quantitation (µg/ml) 0.07

TABLE 3: RP-HPLC technique precision results for Glimepiride


S. No. Concentration (µg/ml) Intraday Interday
1 30 3305558 3305441
2 30 3292266 3297255
3 30 3293512 3302419
4 30 3285834 3302324
5 30 3296448 3302637
6 30 3298422 3299541
Avg. - 3295355 3301622
SD* - 6606.34 2836.59
%RSD* - 0.21 0.084

TABLE 4: Glimepiride recovery data using the RP-HPLC method


Level of Amount of drug Amount of drug
recovery (%) added (µg) Recovered (µg)* % Recovery ± SD*
50 5 4.96 99.3±0.42
100 10 9.99 99.4±0.38
150 15 14.79 98.1±0.49

TABLE 5: Robustness studies of Glimepiride by changing the flow rate


Flow Rate System Suitability Results Retention Time (tR)
Sl. No (ml/min) Plate Count Tailing
1 0.4 2812 1.2 2.736
2 *0.5 2874 1.3 2.473
3 0.6 2798 1.2 2.224

TABLE 6: RP-HPLC technique was utilized to decide the roughness of Glimepiride


Analyst I Analyst II
Label Claim (mg) Amount found (mg) % Recovery Amount found (mg) % Recovery
Samples ± SD** ± SD**
Amryl 1 1.0037 100.38±0.0732 1.0027 100.27± 0.0916
Glemstar 1 1.0025 100.26±0.1146 1.0024 100.24±0.0794

DISCUSSION as the maintenance time. In the fixation scope of


Due to their significance in quality control of 10-50 g/ml, when the centralizations of
prescriptions and medication items, the Glimepiride and their particular pinnacle regions
improvement of a logical technique for deciding were exposed to relapse examination utilizing the
medications by RP-HPLC has drawn in a ton of least squares strategy, a decent direct relationship
consideration lately. The objective of this work (r2= 0.9997) was seen between the convergence
was to make a RP-HPLC technique for dissecting of Glimepiride and their separate pinnacle
Glimepiride in mass drug and drug portion regions. Glimepiride's relapse condition was
structure using the most normally utilized RP-C found to be Y= 109290 X-17080, where 'Y'
18 section with UV discovery [17]. addresses the pinnacle region and 'X' addresses
Each example was infused multiple times, with a the grouping of Glimepiride.
5-minute run span. 2.470 0.035 min was viewed In the focus scope of 10-50 g/ml, linearity was
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e268
Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and Solid Dosage Form

found. The coefficient of relationship (r2) was REFERENCES


viewed as 0.9997. Accuracy was applied to the 1. AL-Salman HNK, Alassadi EAS, Fayadh RH,
mass medicine. For intra-day and between day Hussein HH, Jasim EQ. Development of The
accuracy, the normal was taken and percent RSD Stable. Reliable. Fast and Simple RP-HPLC
was determined, yielding 0.20 and 0.086, Analytical Method for Quantifying
Diphenhydramine-Hcl (DPH) In Pharmaceuticals.
separately. The percent RSD readings were all
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
within two standard deviations, indicating that 2020; 12(4): 4457-4467.
the procedure was accurate. Glimepiride in tablet 2. Mane VB,Babar S,Kulkarni N, “Development Of
formulations was quantified using the RP-HPLC UV Spectrophotometric Method For The
method described in this work. Different analysts Simultaneous Estimation Of Simvastatine And
examined glimepiride tablets (containing 1 mg of Ezetimibe In Tablet Dosage Form By
the medication). We took the average area and Simultaneous Equation AndAbsorbance Ratio
calculated the percent accuracy. The findings are Method” Int. J. of Pharma Res., 2011,3(3),1459-
frequently within the range, i.e., 98-102 percent. 1466.
Glimepiride assays were done by separate 3. Dey S, De A,Mandal S,Pradhan P, “
Development And Validation Of Rp-Hplc
analysts on different occasions (days). The
Method For The Estimation Of Simvastatin In
percent assay was determined, and the findings Bulk And Pharmaceutical Dosage Form” Indo.
were found to be within the acceptable range, Ame. J. of Pharma Res., 2013,7376-7384.
i.e., 98-102 percent [18]. 4. Alsaad AAA, Alassadi EAS, Al-Salman HNK,
The chromatograms of medication arrangement Hussein HH. The Simultaneous Determination of
were recorded with differed stream rates like 0.4 Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Pharmaceutical
ml/min, 0.5 ml/min, and 0.6 ml/min while Formulations by High performance Liquid
keeping the portable stage proportion consistent Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection.
(methanol: phosphate cushion (pH: 4) in the Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics 2019; 13(2): 141-
proportion of 50:50, v/v). The pinnacles were 152.
5. Praveen Kumar S. N., Bhadre Gowda D. G.,
sharp at a stream pace of 0.5 ml/min; in any case,
Vathsala Deepu C., Mantelingu K. and Rangappa
aside from that stream rate, the remainder of the K. S. “Simultaneous estimation of statins like
stream still up in the air to be unacceptable. pravastain, atorvastatin and simvastatin in bulk
Accordingly, the stream pace of 0.5 ml/min was and pharmaceutical dosage form by means
kept up with all through the review. The ofHigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography” J.
chromatograms of medication arrangement were of Chem and Pharma res. 2013, 5(5):359-364.
recorded by changing portable stage proportions 6. Nilesh Jain,Ruchi jain,Hemant swami, “RPHPLC
like methanol: phosphate support (0.051 M, pH: Method for Simultaneous Estimation of
4) = 60:40, 50:50, and 40:60 v/v while keeping Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Bulk Drug and its
the stream rate consistent (0.5 ml/min). The CombinedDosage Form” Asian J. Research
Chem. 1(1): July-Sept. 2008.
pinnacles were fresh with the portable stage
7. B.StephenRathinaraj, V.Rajamanickam,
(50:50 v/v methanol: phosphate cradle). For the Ch.Rajveer, D.Kumaraswamy, Ganesh
investigation, the portable stage proportion Shehraobangla3, A.Arunachalam, “ Int. j. of
(methanol: phosphate support, 50:50 v/v) was Pharma sci. and bio. ,2010,1 (4),325-330.
kept consistent [19,20]. 8. Al-Salman HNK. Analysis methods and
qualitative diagnosis chromatographic for mixture
of narcotic substances in seized materials.
CONCLUSION European Journal of Scientific Research 2017;
147(4): 403-411.
The British Pharmacopoeia lists glimepiride as
9. Rahman MU, Praveen G,Nayola NK,
an official drug. Glimepiride is an anti-diabetic “Simultaneous Estimation Of Simvastatin And
medication of the sulfonyl urea group that has a Ezetimibe In Pharmaceutical Tablet Dosage
long-lasting impact and maintains a more natural Forms By Rp-Hplc” Int. J. of Pharma, 2010,56-62
regulation of insulin secretion during physical 10. Jain N, Jain R, Swami H,Pandey S,
activity. The objective of this study was to create “Spectrophotometric Method For Simultaneous
a fresher, less difficult, more exact, and more Estimation Of Simvastatin And Ezetimibe In Bulk
affordable HPLC strategy for deciding Drug And Its Combineddosage Form” Int. J. of
Glimepiride as a functioning drug fixing and in Pharma and Pharma Sci.,2009, 1(1),170-175.
drug arrangements without impedance from 11. Singala V, Bhaskar R, “Simultaneous Estimation
Of Simvastatin And Metformin Hydrochloride In
different constituents in the definitions.
Bulk And Solid Dosage Forms” Rasayan J.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e269
Development of an RP-HPLC Method to estimation Glimepiride in Bulk and Solid Dosage Form

Chem, 2010,3(3),507-513.
12. Jyothi AP,Tejaswi K,Parimala SS,
“Spectrophotometric Estimation of Simvastatin in
Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form” Int. J. of
Innovative Pharma Res., 2013,4(1),284-287.
13. Muzaffar I, Khalil NY, Alanazi AM, Al-Rasood
KA. “A simple and sensitive high performance
liquid chromatography assay with a fluorescence
detector for determination of canagliflozin in
human plasma” Anal. Methods, 2015, 7, 3028-
3035.
14. Manasa S, Dhanlaxmi K, Reddy NG,Sreenivasa
S. “Method Development and Validation of
Dapagliflozin in API by RP-HPLC and UV-
Spectroscopy” int. J. Of Pharma. Sci and Drug
Res., 2014, 6(3),250-252.
15. Aubry AF , Gu H, Magnier R, Morgan L, Xu X,
Tirmenstein M, Wang B, Deng Y, Cai J, Couerbe
P,Arnold M., “Validated LCMS/MS methods for
the determination of dapagliflozin, a
sodiumglucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in normal
and ZDF rat plasma.” Bioanalysis. 2010
Dec;2(12):2001-2009.
16. AL-Salman HN, Ali ET, Almukhtar OA, Jabir
MS. 2-benzhydrylsulfinyl-N-hydroxyacetamide
Extracted from Fig: A good Therapeutic Agent
against Staphylococcus Aureus. AIP Conference
Proceedings 2020; 2213(1): 020223-5.
17. Jani BR, Shah KV and Kapupara PP.
“Development and Validation of UV
Spectroscopic First Derivative Method for
Simultaneous Estimation of Dapagliflozin and
Metformin Hydrochloride in Synthetic Mixture”
J. of Bioequv. study, 2015,1(1),102.
18. Manasa S, Dhanlaxmi K, Reddy NG,Sreenivasa
S. “ Development And Validation Of A Rp-Hplc
Method For The Estimation Of Dapagliflozin In
Api” Int. J. of Pharma sci and Res., 2014,5(12),
5394-539.
19. Jani BR , Shah KV, Kapupara PP, “Development
And Validation Of UV Spectroscopic Method For
Simultaneous Estimation Of Dapagliflozin And
Metformin Hydrochloride In Synthetic Mixture”
int. j. res. and Dev.pharma and life sci., 2015,
4(3),1569-1576
20. Al-Salman HNK, Ali ET, Jabir M, Sulaiman GM,
Al-Jadaan SAS. 2-Benzhydrylsulfinyl-N-
hydroxyacetamide-Na extracted from fig as a
novel cytotoxic and apoptosis inducer in SKOV-3
and AMJ-13 cell lines via P53 and caspase-8
pathway. European Food Research and
Technology 2020; 246(8): 1-18.

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(13):e265–e270; 13 May 2023.


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Muslim OT et al.

e270

You might also like