Improved Power Quality AC-DC Converters With High Frequency Transformer Isolation
Improved Power Quality AC-DC Converters With High Frequency Transformer Isolation
Improved Power Quality AC-DC Converters With High Frequency Transformer Isolation
By Prof. Bhim Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India email:[email protected] Ph.: (91)-011-2659-1045
Classification
Improved Power Quality AC-DC Converters with High Frequency Transformer Isolation
The control of DC-DC converter is done such as the input current wave shaping is achieved for AC-DC Diode converter. The DC-DC converter can be operated in both DCM and CCM mode. The control technique for DCM and CCM are different. It works as voltage follower in DCM mode and there is no need of input voltage & current sensing for power factor correction.
Applications
DC Power Supplies, Telecommunication Power Supply, Improved Power Factor ballast, Power Supplies for equipments like computers, medical equipments, printers, scanners etc. Drives Applications with Power Factor Improvement at AC side, Electrical Welding,
Co
Vo Load
Co
Vo Load
Co
Vo Load
Q1
Q2
Q1 Co
Vo Load
+ Vo Load
Rd
Q2
Q2
Q4
is vs
Co
Vo Load
Co
Vo Load
Load
(1)
pk
where I is the peak of input current (thats switch current) and D is the duty ratio. From Fig.1b I is given as:
I pk = DTs v1r Lm
m
(2)
where v1r is rectified input voltage and L is transformer magnetizing inductance referred to primary. From eqns (1) and (2), the input current is as:
D 2 Ts i1 = v1r 2L m
(3)
(5) (6)
Since input inductor current is nothing but the rectified ac mains current, thus from Eqn. (4), it is clear that by keeping the duty cycle and switching frequency constant, the average input current in flyback converter in DCM follows the input voltage exactly thus emulating a resistor and is known as voltage follower technique. Therefore, flyback converter behaves as an ideal current shaper, and performs current shaping automatically with no control when operating in DCM.
(7)
where n is the turn ratio. From Fig. 1b, for DCM operation, the condition is: D + D1 < 1 (8) From Eqns. (7) and (8), for the desired maximum duty ratio at minimum input voltage, turn ratio can be obtained by satisfying following inequality as:
n> D V1 (1 D) Vo
(9)
(10)
where V is the peak value of minimum input voltage. RL min is the minimum value of load resistance and f is the switching frequency. Output capacitor is selected on the basis of maximum peak-to-peak ripple in output voltage ( r ) as:
s v
Co >
Vo rv R L
(11)
(16)
Thus in a similar manner as in DCM, for desirable maximum duty ratio, the turn ratio is determined. However, magnetizing inductance of the transformer is defined by satisfying the following inequality [6]:
Lm > R L max V 4f s ( o ) 2 V1min
(17)
Referring Fig. 2b, switch current at half of the ripple is given as:
I swh = Pomax V1min D max
(18)
where ,
I sw = V1min D max Ts Lm
2 D max [I swpk I sw I swpk +
(21) (22)
Id
where,
Id = Vo (1 Dmax )Ts L2
Specifications
Input: V1 = 220VRMS , 50Hz, Single-Phase AC Supply Output: Vo = 110V , Po = 1kW , Output voltage-ripple less than 2% Switching frequency f s = ( s / 2 ) = 50kHz Design parameters for DCM Transformer turn ratio (n) 1.5:1, Magnetizing inductance L m = C f = 800nF and C o = 15mF .
50 H , L f = 1mH ,
Test results of AC mains voltage, AC mains current, output DC voltage and output DC current waveform of AC-DC flyback converter for load perturbation response on equivalent resistive load (60W to 200W to 60W). (Scale on X-axis 1div=20ms, Yaxis channel-1 1div =85V, channel-2 1div =5A, channel-3 1div= 100V, channel-4 1div= 2A)
Idc (A)
Vdc (V)
Vs (V), is(A)
Single-Phase Cuk AC-DC Converter Inductors voltage and current waveforms in DCM
Single-Phase Cuk AC-DC Converter Inductors voltage and current waveforms in CCM
(3) (4)
i2 '= i +
where i is the minimum input inductor current. Second Stage of Operation When switch is off, inductor currents decrease linearly with voltage across them equal to output voltage. Referring to Fig. 1b(ii) and Fig. 1c, inductor currents are given by:
vo ' t+ L1 v ' i2 '= o t + L2 ' i1 = v1r dTs + i L1 v1r dTs i L2 '
(5)
(11)
Single-Phase Cuk AC-DC Converter Average and peak currents in the semiconductors and input inductor
Average current ( i sw av ) and peak current ( i sw pk ) of the MOSFET switch over a switching cycle are as:
v i sw av = 1r L eq d 2T s 2 + (I 1max + I 2max ' ).d
(16)
i sw pk = (I1max + I 2max ' ) (17) where I1max and I 2max ' are the maximum value of input inductor current and output inductor current (referred to primary) respectively. Average current ( i d av ' ), and peak current ( i d pk ' ) of the diode (all referred to primary) are as:
v i d av ' = o L eq d 2 Ts + (I 1max + I 2max ' ).(1 - d) 2
(18) (19)
Single-Phase Cuk AC-DC Converter Average and peak currents in the semiconductors and input inductor
Peak voltage across switch ( Vsw pk ) and diode ( Vd pk ' ) (referred to primary) is given as: Vsw pk = Vd pk ' = Vinmax + Vo ' (20) The average current ( i L1av ) and RMS current ( i L1rms ) of input inductor are as: 2I i L1av = 1max (21)
I i L1rms = 1max 2
(22)
(23)
where, v1r = V1 sin t (24) For t = 90 , conversion ratio is obtained as the first step of the design. Here V1 is the peak value of input voltage. Step 2: Condition for operation in DCM and CCM Design must ensure the DCM operation, for which following inequality must hold good:
Ke < 1 2(M + n) 2
(25)
where K e is the conduction parameter and n is the transformer primary to secondary turn ratio.
(27)
where R L is the load resistance. Step 4: Duty Ratio The duty ratio for the given power (load resistance) in DCM is obtained by:
d= 2M K e
(28)
Step 5: L1 and L 2 ' Design L1 can be obtained by considering the specified maximum current ripple for DCM as: 2L eq L1 = (29) dri where ri is p.u. ripple current. L 2 ' can be obtained using expressions for L1 and L eq in eqns. (29) and (10) respectively. Similarly, for CCM L1 and L 2 ' can be obtained by specified maximum current ripple allowed and eqn. (10).
r 2 (L1 + L 2 ' )
(30)
where, L < r < s Resonant frequency ( r ) should lie between line frequency ( L ) and switching frequency ( s ). Step 7: Output Capacitor Output capacitor is chosen according to specified ripple allowed in the output voltage. It can be achieved by following formula:
Co = 1 L rv R L min
R L min
Test results of AC mains voltage, AC mains current, output DC voltage and output DC current waveform of AC-DC cuk converter for load perturbation response on equivalent resistive load (60W to 200W to 60W). (Scale on X-axis 1div=20ms, Yaxis channel-1 1div =175V, channel-2 1div =5A, channel-3 1div= 100V, channel-4 1div= 1.75A)
Idc (A)
Vdc (V)
in
CCM
in
CCM
Specifications
Input: V1 =
230VRMS ,
Output: Vo = 110V , Po = 1.5kW Output voltage-ripple less than 2% Switching frequency f s = ( s / 2 ) = 50kHz Transformer turn ratio (n) 1:1,
L1 = 1200 H ,
in
in
Test results of AC mains voltage, AC mains current, output DC voltage and output DC current waveform of AC-DC sepic converter for load perturbation response on equivalent resistive load (60W to 200W to 60W). (Scale on X-axis 1div=20ms, Y-axis channel-1 1div =150V, channel-2 1div =5A, channel-3 1div= 100V, channel-4 1div= 1.75A)
Idc (A)
Vdc (V)
Vs (V), is(A)
ratio
(n)
5:1,
Magnetizing
Test results of AC mains voltage, AC mains current, output DC voltage and output DC current waveform of AC-DC zeta converter for load perturbation response on equivalent resistive load (60W to 200W to 60W). (Scale on X-axis 1div=20ms, Yaxis channel-1 1div =150V, channel-2 1div =3A, channel-3 1div= 100V, channel-4 1div= 1.75A)
Idc (A)
Vdc (V)
Vs (V), is(A)
References
R. W. Erickson, Fundamentals of Power Electronics. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997. A. I. Pressman, Switching Power Supply Design. Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998. P. T. Krein, Elements of Power Electronics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. M. H. J. Bollen, Understanding Power Quality Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions. New York: IEEE Press Series on Power Engineering, 2000. D. Boroyevich and S. Hiti, Three-phase PWM converter: Modeling and Control Design. Seminar 9, IEEE APEC96, 1996. M. F. Schlecht and B.A Miwa, Active power factor correction for switching power supplies, IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,vol.2, pp.273281, October 1987. M. Kravitz,Power factor correction circuit for power supplies, U.S. Patent 4,961,044, Oct. 1990. J. Sebastian, M. Jaureguizar, and J. Uceda, An overview of power factor correction in single-phase off-line power supply systems, in Proc. IEEE IECON94, 1994, pp. 1688 -1693.
R. Redl, I. Balogh, and N.O. Sokal, A new family of single-stage isolated powerfactor correctors with fast regulation of the output voltage, in Proc. IEEE PESC94, 1994, pp. 1137 1144. J. Sebastian, J. A. Cobos, J.M. Lopera and J. Uceda, The determination of the boundaries between continuous and discontinuous conduction modes in PWM DC-toDC converters used as power factor preregulators, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 10, pp. 574 -582, Sept. 1995. A. Zak, Multi-channel single stage high power factor AC to DC converter, U.S. Patent 5,619,404, April 1997. H. Mao, F. C. Y. Lee, D. Boroyevich, Review of high-performance three-phase power-factor correction circuits, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 44, pp. 437-446, August 1997. G. A. Karvelis, S. N. Manias and G. Kostakis, A comparative evaluation of power converters used for current harmonics elimination, in IEEE HQP98, 1998, pp. 227232. H. Wei and I. Batarseh, Comparison of basic converter topologies for power correction, in IEEE SOUTHEASTCON98, 1998, pp. 348-353. C. Qiao and K.M. Smedley, A topology survey of single-stage power factor corrector with a boost type input-current-shaper, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 16, pp. 360-368, May 2001. L.Huber, J. Zhang, M.M. Jovanovic and F.C. Lee, Generalized topologies of singlestage input-current-shaping circuits, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 16, pp. 508513, July 2001. F.L. Williamson, Universal input/output power supply with inherent near unity power factor, U.S. Patent 6,343,021, Jan. 2002. M. Keller, Design of a 250 Amp telecom rectifier with true three-phase unity power factor input rectification stage, in Proc. IEEE INTELEC02, 2002, pp. 94- 100. O. Garca, J. A. Cobos, R. Prieto, P. Alou and J. Uceda, Single Phase Power factor correction: A survey, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, pp. 749-755, May 2003.