Scribd
Upload
299 views2 pages

Laboratory Activity 3

Uploaded by

Cana Alberona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
299 views2 pages

Laboratory Activity 3

Uploaded by

Cana Alberona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

STUDENT NAME: DATE:

PROGRAM & YEAR: RATING:


LABORATORY ACTIVITY #3
LEGAL STATUS OF POLYGRAPH IN THE PHILIPPINES
I. OBJECTIVES
This activity aims to attain the following objectives
1. To determine the legal status of Polygraph in the Philippines when used in criminal
cases
2. To analyze these decisions and relate it to their function as polygraph examiner.
II. KEY WORD
People v. Daniel (G.R> No. L-40330 Nov. 20, 1978)
People v. Adoviso, 309 SCRA 1 (1999)
People v. Reanzares G.R. No.130656, 29 June 2000
People v. Carpo, G.R. No. 132676,4 April 2001
III. TASK
To write and give insight the significant of legality of polygraph and some case related to the
use of polygraph examination result of evidence in the Philippines.
IV. Procedure
The students will describe and give insight the following criminal cases promulgated by the
Supreme Court on the admissibility issue of polygraph examination. Provide a concise
summary on each of the decision rendered by the court.

CASES DECISION
1 People v. Daniel
(G.R> No. L-40330 Nov. 20, 1978)

2 People v. Adoviso, 309 SCRA 1


(1999)

3 People v. Reanzares G.R.


No.130656, 29 June 2000

4 People v. Carpo, G.R. No. 132676,4


April 2001

FORENSIC 5 Lie Detection Techniques JAKE M. ALLARTE


Faculty, School of Criminology
REFLECTION:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________

FORENSIC 5 Lie Detection Techniques JAKE M. ALLARTE


Faculty, School of Criminology

You might also like