International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | April - 2022 Impact Factor: 7.185 ISSN: 2582-3930

SECURE E-VOTING USING BLOCKCHAIN

TECHNOLOGY
Barkha Ramteke
Computer Science department
G H RAISONI INSTITUTE OF ENGINNERING AND TECHNOLOGY, NAGPUR
[email protected]

Prof. Dr. Sonali Ridhorkar

Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H RAISONI INSTITUTE OF ENGINNERING AND TECHNOLOGY, NAGPUR
[email protected]

an exchange if the majority of the hubs agree [4-6]. This

Abstract- An election is an important event in all countries.
method allows clients to remain anonymous. An in-depth
Traditional voting has several drawbacks, including the evaluation of the blockchain innovation (counting precise
expense of time and effort required for tallying and counting agreements) suggests that it is a valid explanation for e-voting
results, the cost of papers, arrangements, and everything else
a ballot and, moreover, that it has the potential to create e-
required to complete a voting process. Many countries are now
voting a
considering online e-voting systems, but the traditional e-
ballot more adequate and secure. [7-9].
voting systems suffer a lack of trust, it is not known if a vote is
Blockchain technology is supported by a distributed network of
counted correctly, tampered or not. A lack of transparency
thousands of interconnected hubs. If the majority of the hubs
means that the voter has no assurance that his or her vote will
agree, they accept the adjustment. This method allows clients
be counted as they voted in elections. Electronic voting systems
to remain anonymous. An in-depth evaluation of the
are increasingly using blockchain technology as an underlying
blockchain innovation (counting precise agreements) suggests
storage mechanism to make the voting process more
that it is a valid cause for e-voting a ballot and that it has the
transparent and assure data immutability as blockchain
potential to make e-voting a ballot more satisfying and reliable.
technology grows in popularity. The transparent feature, on
the other hand, may reveal critical information about “I) more openness as a result of open and appropriated records,
applicants because all system users have the same entitlement ii) inalienable obscurity, iii) security and unwavering quality
to their data. Furthermore, because of blockchain's pseudo- (especially against Denial-of-Service Attacks), and iv)
anonymity, voters' privacy will be revealed, and third parties changelessness (solid trustworthiness) [7-9]”.
involved in the voting process, such as registration institutions, In the current paper and voting form voting a ballot procedure,
will be able to tamper with data. To overcome these difficulties, the outcome examination of the political contest takes hours and
we apply Ethereum smart contracts to blockchain-based voting occasionally days, and the results are rarely screwed up by human
systems. or computer error, resulting in the operation taking significantly
longer. The blockchain concept envisions a world in which that
Keywords— Blockchain, e-voting specific flaw is removed from the equation and votes are
immediately verified. Voters should cast a ballot in a regulated
I. INTRODUCTION domain to meet the protection and security requirements for e-
voting a ballot, as well as to ensure that the political decision
Advanced vote-based systems are based on voting a ballot, system does not enable constrained voting. To achieve these
whether it is traditional artistic dance-based voting or goals, we suggest a hyper ledger private blockchain in our
electronic voting (e-voting a ballot). Voter apathy has been research. It employs a formula that expresses relatively short
growing in recent months, especially among the younger exchanges via an agreement component that is based on a stake
PC/technically savvy generation [1]. E-voting is a strategy for in one's way of life.
meeting the demands of the youth [2, 3]. Blockchain
technology is supported by a distributed network of thousands II. RELATED WORK
of interconnected hubs. “Each of these hubs has its own E-voting is a ballot that self-counts. In the scholarly study, e-voting
duplicate of the appropriated record, which contains the a
complete history of all trades handled by the system.”. The A ballot is a thriving and unfading point. A focal authority is often
system is not controlled by a single power. They acknowledge incorporated in traditional brought-together e-voting a ballot
conventions for sorting out the political decision and checking the

© 2022, IJSREM | www.ijsrem.com DOI: 10.55041/IJSREM12556 | Page 1

 International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | April - 2022 Impact Factor: 7.185 ISSN: 2582-3930

votes. Kiayias et al [8] suggested the idea of self tallying voting a electronic voting plans while ignoring the security issue of e-voting
ballot to achieve better grounded voter security, which is another a ballot.”.
perspective in decentralized e-voting systems. In self-counting
systems, counting is an open system in which any group, including III. PROBLEM STATEMENT
voters and observers, can check the authenticity of each polling form Because the blockchain maintains an unchangeable square of their
and compute the final voting result after collecting all of the vote and their character, voters are not allowed to vote more than
substantial voting forms. They made the most significant once. Because the blockchain is irreversible, erasing a vote is
breakthrough by using a release board, which assures flawless absurd. Controllers or reviewers can efficiently verify the votes at
voting form security and debate freedom. any time and from any location. The e-voting a ballot programming
Groth et al. [7] "suggested a less complicated plan that would be application can provide
more beneficial for every voter." They also created an unknown
communication channel with perfect message mystery at the
expense of the convention's increased round unpredictability, which considerable benefits to both balloters and EC (Electoral
requires n + 1 rounds for n voters.” “Proposed a selfcounting voting Commission) officials. However, at the same time, the proposes e-
a ballot convention depending on a two-round mystery veto voting a ballot application provides a wide range of risks to political
convention,” according to Hao et al. [6]. (AVnet). Their convention decision security and honesty, and fundamentally alters the spirit of
has similar security features, but it is more successful in terms of political race transparency and inquiry. E-Voting has a Relatively
round unpredictability.” Bitcoin, Khader et al. “guaranteed that is Favorable rating; at the end of the day, Comparative Benefit is
neither vigorous nor reasonable, and they propelled the convention assigned when an improvement is deemed superior to the previous
by introducing a responsibility step and a recovery round.” To voting form-based voting procedure; therefore e-Voting is superior
strengthen voter protection, Takabatake et al. [3] developed a voting to the manual voting system. The e-voting a ballot programming
convention based on application can provide considerable benefits to both balloters and
Zerocoin. In 2017, McCorry et al. “introduced Open Vote Network EC (Electoral Commission) officials. However, at the same time,
8 9 as the primary application of a decentralized selfcounting e- the proposes e-voting a ballot application provides a wide range of
voting a ballot convention based on Blockchain. “The dedication in risks to political decision security and honesty, and fundamentally
is the hash of the vote, which is hopeless if a voter will not cast his alters the spirit of political race transparency and inquiry. E-Voting
voting form in the voting stage.” Shahzad B et al “exhibited a has a Relatively Favorable rating; at the end of the day, Comparative
reliable evoting system in to alter the square makes and seals by Benefit is assigned when an improvement is deemed superior to the
changing the hash work in the blockchain to accomplish the validity previous voting formbased voting procedure; therefore e-Voting is
and decency of the political decision. In the DATE proposed by Lai superior to the manual voting system.
et al., the decency of the e-voting a ballot and the security assurance IV. EXISTING SYSTEM
for voters were acknowledged by utilizing the blockchain and ring
mark innovation. Simultaneously, it likewise made them count The cutting-edge majority rule governments are expanding on
highlight. Tragically, on the grounds that there is no outsider expert voting a ballot, whether it is the traditional creative dance based or
on the plan, it can't be reviewed. In an e-voting a ballot system electronic voting (e-voting a ballot). Voter apathy has been growing
dependent on blockchain and ring mark set forward” by Wu et al, in recent years, especially among the younger PC/educated
straightforwardness and security were settled. generation. Evoting is being promoted as a possible solution for
attracting younger voters. Various functional and security
Wei-Jr Lai et al “proposed a proficient decentralized unknown
requirements are defined for a robust e-voting a ballot plan,
voting system. The system depended on the Ethernet and utilized
including transparency, accuracy, auditability, system and
the ring mark plan to guarantee the straightforwardness and
information uprightness, mystery/protection, accessibility, and
protection of the system. It accomplished the objective of high
power dissemination. The present system is based on the
proficiency and speed through equal activity in the checking stage.
blockchain. The current system operates in a secure electronic
Along these lines, Freya Sheer Hardwick offered a blockchain e-
voting system that provides the decency and security of existing
voting a ballot convention, which accomplished obscurity and
voting plans while also providing the simplicity and adaptability of
straightforwardness as well as expanded the modifiability of the
electronic systems has been put to the test for quite some time. The
polling form by using blind mark and duty innovation in the
current method makes use of blockchain to aid in the execution of
blockchain. This has additionally become another course in the
distributed electronic voting systems.
investigation of e-voting a ballot system”.

Pd McCorry and colleagues. “In, proposed a blockchain-based

4.1 DISADVANTAGES OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM
shrewd agreement for board races, which is the main scheme that
does not rely on any trusted in power to tally and assure voter
security. From then on, Adiputra CK proposed "A Proposal of • No straightforwardness
Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting System" in 2018, which • No Immutability
addressed the general unquestionable status issue of blockchain
• No Remote Voting

© 2022, IJSREM | www.ijsrem.com DOI: 10.55041/IJSREM12556 | Page 2

 International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | April - 2022 Impact Factor: 7.185 ISSN: 2582-3930

1) Greater straightforwardness because of open and

Mechanism V PROPOSE SYSTEM dispersed records,
2) Inherent namelessness in the blockchain systems,
3) Security and unwavering quality

VI MODULE DESCRIPTION

6.1 CONTESTANT MODULE

The political decision-makers are in charge of the challenger's

stage enrolment. When a political choice is taken, the political race
chairmen must create a predetermined list of qualifying
Fig 1 Overview of proposed system candidates.

This may necessitate a portion for a personality confirmation

Voters should cast a ballot in a controlled environment to meet the administration to safely authenticate and approve qualified
protection and security requirements for e-voting a ballot, as well individuals. Using such a service is necessary to meet the
as to ensure that the political race system does not enable confined requirement of secure validation, which isn't guaranteed when
voting. In our effort, we set up a Hyperledger private blockchain using a blockchain basis. A character wallet would be produced for
to achieve these goals. It makes use of a calculation that allows each qualifying candidate in our work. Every challenger is given a
for equally swift exchanges through an agreement instrument that one-of-a-kind wallet for each political campaign in which they are
is based on a qualified to run.
stake in one's way of life. It explains why Hyperledger is used in
the blockchain system. Speak with each voter in the area where 6.2 VOTER MODULE
the ballot will be cast. Each locality hub has a product specialist
At this point, the ageing of the large number of keys held by
who independently interacts with the "boot node" and manages
the voters begins, with the expectation that all of the panel and
the keen agreement's existence pattern on that hub. When the
witness keys will have been raised by the time this stage begins. At
political race leader makes a political choice, a vote form smart
this point, here's a rough outline. This is the stage that voters will
agreement is circulated and transmitted to the corresponding
go through as the political campaign unfolds, starting with entering
location hub. When the polling form smart agreements are
the airport and ending with exiting the terminal, where the political
produced, each of the contrasting location hubs is given
decision is made. The council will provide voters with a blank
permission to associate with their relating contract. When a voter
polling form that must be decoded using their unique voter private
takes a decision based on her savvy contract, the vote information
key. Following the completion of the selection phase, a structured
is certified by the majority of the comparing area hubs, and each
succession of information will be framed. The end result of this
vote they accept is recorded on the blockchain.
political race process is that each voter will receive a hash that can
The political decision process has the accompanying jobs:
be used to check the results of the election. It is typical that each
decision terminal does not have the same hash incentive for
1. A political decision manager is someone different voters.
who manages the lifespan of a political campaign. This
project could involve a number of different faith-based
6.3 ELECTION COMMISSION MODULE
organizations and organizations. The political decision
The three sections that make up a savvy agreement are (1)
managers are in charge of making the political decision,
recognizing the jobs that are associated with the understanding (in
registering voters, determining the duration of the decision,
our case, the political race understanding), (2) the understanding
and appointing permissioned hubs. procedure (i.e., political decision procedure), and (3) the
exchanges (i.e., voting a ballot exchange) that are used in the savvy
2. A voter is a person who is eligible to vote. contract. 1) Election jobs: In a keen agreement, the election jobs
After making a political decision, voters can validate their include the gatherings that need to be included in the
identity, load political race voting forms, make their choice, understanding. The following jobs are associated with the political
and check their vote. election process: (I) Election overseer: Responsible for the entire
life cycle of a political campaign. This project could involve a
5.1 ADVANATAGES OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM number of thought foundations and organizations. The leaders of
political races make political decisions, register voters, set the
duration of the political decision, and reassign permissioned hubs.

© 2022, IJSREM | www.ijsrem.com DOI: 10.55041/IJSREM12556 | Page 3

 International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | April - 2022 Impact Factor: 7.185 ISSN: 2582-3930

Political race leaders create political decision polling forms using References
a careful agreement in which the chairman characterizes a
[1] Al-Hamadi, Hamid, and Ray Chen. ”Trust -based decision
rundown of alternatives for each voting region. The smart contracts making for health IoT systems.” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4,
are then put together on the block chain, where area hubs can link no. 5
to their corresponding brilliant contract. (2017): 1408-1419.
[2] V. Santos, J. P. Barraca, and D. Gomes. “ Secure Decentralized
6.4 BLOCKCHAIN MODULE IoT Infrastructure”. In Wireless Days, IEEE, pp. 173 -175, 2017.
Cryptography is the process of concealing and disclosing [3] I. Yaqoob, E. Ahmed, I. A. T. Hashem, A. I. A. Ahmed, A. Gani,
information by complicated number crunching, often known as M. Imran and M. Guizani, “ Internet of things architecture: Recent
scrambling and unscrambling. This implies that the e-voting ballot advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges”. IEEE wireless
communications, vol. 24, no.3, pp. 10 -16, 2017.
voter information must only be seen by the designated recipients.
[4] S. Huh, S. Cho and S. Kim. “ Managing IoT devices using
blockchain platform.” In Advanced Communication Technology
The approach entails taking decoded data, such as voting ballot (ICACT), 2017 19 th International Conference on, pp. 464 -467. IEEE,
data, and encoding it with a logical estimation called a figure. This 2017.
sends a ciphertext, which is a piece of e-voting ballot data that is [5] P. McCorry, S.F. Shahandashti and F. Hao. “ A smart contract
completely meaningless until it is decoded. Symmetric-key for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy”. International
cryptography is the name given to this encryption technique. Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer,
Cryptography is used in blockchain development to ensure that e- Cham, pp. 357 - 375, 2017.
voting a ballot trade are done safely, while also confirming all e- [6] F. Hao, P.Y.A. Ryan and P. Zieli??ski. “Anonymous voting by
voting a ballot information and reserves of critical value. As a tworound public discussion”. IET Information Security, vol. 4, no. 2, pp.
62-67, 2010.
result, everyone utilizing blockchain may be assured that once e-
[7] J. Groth. “ Efficient maximal privacy in boardroom voting and
voting ballot information is stored on a blockchain, it is done so
anonymous broadcast”. In International Conference on Financial
honestly and in a way that does not compromise security. Cryptography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 90-104, 2004.
[8] A. Kiayias and M. Yung. “ Self-tallying elections and perfect
Using an open blockchain to store and exchange trade e-voting ballot secrecy”. In International Workshop on Public Key
ballot information introduces serious security risks: all data Cryptography,Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 141-158, 2002.
recorded in the record is in clear text, as is customary. Data [9] D. Khader, B. Smyth, P. Ryan and F. Hao. “ A fair and robust
mystery cannot be guaranteed because each center has an exact voting system by broadcast”. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI),
copy of the record. The private blockchain is recommended to ProceedingsSeries of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI), pp. 285 299,
overcome the difficulties in the open blockchain. The opposite of 2012.
open blockchain is private blockchain. It's because certain [10] T. C. Hsiao et al., “Electronic voting systems for defending free
limitations that are exposed to everybody on an open blockchain will and resisting bribery and coercion based on ring anonymous
aren't open to all here. signcryption scheme,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering., 2017, 9(1):
1687814016687194.

VII CONCLUSION

The blockchain technology offers yet another option to

get over electronic voting's limitations and reception barriers,
preserving the security and honesty of political decisions while
also establishing the groundwork for transparency. With a
Hyper record private blockchain, it is feasible to submit several
exchanges per second into the block chain, with each
component of the brilliant agreement assisting the heap on the
blockchain. Extra steps should be taken to assist larger
countries in achieving a higher throughput of exchanges per
second.

© 2022, IJSREM | www.ijsrem.com DOI: 10.55041/IJSREM12556 | Page 4