0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Resultanova

The document discusses the results of several ANOVA tests with different factors and interactions on a dependent variable yield. Temperature alone and its interaction with extraction time were found to significantly affect yield based on p-values less than 0.05, while other factors and interactions did not show significant effects.

Uploaded by

Amdjed Hydrau
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Resultanova

The document discusses the results of several ANOVA tests with different factors and interactions on a dependent variable yield. Temperature alone and its interaction with extraction time were found to significantly affect yield based on p-values less than 0.05, while other factors and interactions did not show significant effects.

Uploaded by

Amdjed Hydrau
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

one way anova

> one.way <- aov(yield ~ Temperature, data = dat)


> plot(one.way, 1)
> summary(one.way)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Temperature 1 51.39 51.39 6.337 0.0167 *
Residuals 34 275.75 8.11
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
interp
Conclusion: Temperature has a significant effect on yield (p-value < 0.05).

factor interaction on yield

interaction <- aov(yield ~ Extraction_Time*Temperature, data = dat)


> summary(interaction)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Extraction_Time 1 19.10 19.10 2.833 0.10205
Temperature 1 51.39 51.39 7.625 0.00945 **
Extraction_Time:Temperature 1 40.98 40.98 6.080 0.01922 *
Residuals 32 215.68 6.74
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Conclusions: Both Extraction_Time and the interaction term have p-values < 0.05, indicating significant effe

> interaction2 <- aov(yield ~ Pretreatement_Time*Temperature, data = dat)


> summary(interaction2)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Pretreatement_Time 1 4.18 4.18 0.493 0.4876
Temperature 1 51.39 51.39 6.069 0.0193 *
Pretreatement_Time:Temperature 1 0.60 0.60 0.071 0.7915
Residuals 32 270.97 8.47
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Conclusions: Temperature alone has a significant effect on yield (p-value < 0.05), while Pretreatement_Time

avona two way


two.way <- aov(yield ~ Extraction_Time + Pretreatement_Time, data = dat)
> summary(two.way)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Extraction_Time 1 19.10 19.097 2.074 0.159
Pretreatement_Time 1 4.18 4.175 0.453 0.505
Residuals 33 303.87 9.208

>

Conclusions: Neither Extraction_Time nor Pretreatement_Time has a significant effect on yield (p-values > 0

In summary, it appears that the factor T has a significant effect on the dependent variable yield
. Additionally, there is a significant interaction effect between TEXT and T in the interaction ANOVA. The factor TEXT alone, ho
indicating significant effects on yield. Temperature alone also has a significant effect.

while Pretreatement_Time and the interaction term are not significant (p-value > 0.05).
fect on yield (p-values > 0.05).

variable yield in both the one-way and two-way ANOVA tests.


VA. The factor TEXT alone, however, does not have a significant effect on yield in any of the tests.

You might also like