Media Part 1
Media Part 1
Media Part 1
Media Watchdog Groups: Organizations like Media Matters for America and
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) actively monitor and critique media
coverage, advocating for diversity and accuracy in reporting.
In summary, pluralists contend that a diverse ownership structure, combined
with market competition and regulatory safeguards, promotes a pluralistic media
landscape with a variety of voices and content.
Counterarguments
Corporate Influence: Pluralists assume that media organizations prioritize public
interest over profit. However, critics - profit motives can lead to sensationalism,
clickbait, and prioritization of content that generates more revenue, potentially
sacrificing journalistic integrity.
-There is plenty of evidence that owners of the Press are not neutral when it
comes to the editorial line taken by their newspaper.
-Do the public get what they want, or come to want what they are given?
-In MBC Journalists and editors within state-owned media may practice self-
censorship to avoid running afoul of government authorities or facing
professional repercussions
provide editorial guidelines or directives to MBC, suggesting how certain topics
or events should be covered. These directives can impact the framing and tone of
news REPORTING.
Counterarguments:
- Media Pluralism
- Audience Agency: Critics argue that audiences are not passive
recipients of media messages but actively engage with and
interpret content. Individuals critically assess media narratives and
form their own opinions.
- Cultural Diversity: Neo-Marxist perspectives might overlook the
cultural diversity within societies. Different subcultures, identities,
and counter-cultures can exist and influence media content and
consumption.
Media’s impact on society cannot be solely attributed to capitalist or
hegemonic forces, as audiences, technological advancements, and
diverse ownership structures play significant roles in shaping media
content and its effects.
Mass manipulation may involve framing stories in a way that aligns
with a particular narrative or agenda.
Misinformation and Disinformation: Intentionally spreading false or
misleading information is a form of mass manipulation. This can be
done through false reporting, deepfake videos, or the amplification of
conspiracy theories.
Sensationalism: Overhyping or sensationalizing stories can capture
attention and generate emotional reactions, even if the news is not
particularly significant.
Censorship: Suppressing or controlling the dissemination of information
can prevent the public from accessing alternative viewpoints or critical
information.
Content Suppression: Censorship can involve the outright suppression
or prohibition of specific topics, stories, or information from being
published, broadcast, or distributed.
Forms:
Content Suppression
Self-Censorship
Selective Reporting
Legal Restrictions
Impact:
Limits access to information.
Discourages critical reporting.
Shapes the narrative in line with government agenda.
Challenges press freedom and freedom of expression.
The Turkish government has a history of suppressing media outlets
critical of its policies. In 2016, Turkey’s oldest newspaper, Cumhuriyet,
faced censorship and arrests of its journalists.
Russia – Internet Censorship (2021):
Russia has implemented extensive internet censorship measures,
including blocking access to websites and platforms that contain
political dissent or information critical of the government.
North Korea’s media is entirely state-controlled, with no independent
journalism. The regime tightly controls all information, and
international media outlets are not allowed to operate freely within
the country.
Saudi Arabia – Jamal Khashoggi (2018): Saudi journalist’s murder
raises press freedom concerns.
How the media may influence the political process, including agenda
setting, opinion polls, and news Reporting.
Media Influence on Political Process:
Agenda Setting:
Explanation: Media shapes public awareness by deciding which issues
to emphasize in their coverage.
Sociological Explanation: Gatekeeping function of media influences
public perception of critical political issues.
Example: In the 2016 U.S. election, media’s coverage of immigration
and email scandals made these key issues for voters.
Opinion Polls:
Explanation: Media reports on polls that gauge public sentiment,
influencing political campaigns and strategies.
Sociological Explanation: “Spiral of silence” theory suggests people
conform to perceived majority views.
Example: Consistent polls showing one candidate leading can sway
voters to support that candidate.
News Reporting:
Explanation: Media tone, framing, and content shape public perception
of political issues.
Sociological Explanation: Media framing and “priming” theory affect
issue portrayal and candidate evaluation.
Example: Negative framing of a politician’s actions as “scandals” can
influence public perception. During COVID-19, different media reports
on government actions influenced public opinions on the pandemic.
New Media and Globalization: