Advice From STUK September 2012 Paediatric CT
Advice From STUK September 2012 Paediatric CT
Advice From STUK September 2012 Paediatric CT
Säteilyturvakeskus
Strålsäkerhetscentralen
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
Translation. Original text in Finnish.
Several paediatric radiologists and medical physics experts who are specialized in paediatric
CT imaging and also scanner suppliers have taken part in preparing this guide. STUK expres-
ses its greatest thanks to them for sharing their expertise and their good cooperation.
Katja Merimaa, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (ed.)
Raija Seuri, Helsinki University Hospital (ed.)
Ritva Bly, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
Anna Föhr, Helsinki University Hospital
Eero Hippeläinen, Helsinki University Hospital
Minna Husso, Kuopio University Hospital
Touko Kaasalainen, Helsinki University Hospital
Eero Kauppinen, Central Finland Central Hospital
Reetta Kivisaari, Helsinki University Hospital
Mika Kortesniemi, Helsinki University Hospital
Kirsi Lauerma, Helsinki University Hospital
Laura Martelius, Helsinki University Hospital
Marja Perhomaa, Oulu University Hospital
Jukka Schildt, Helsinki University Hospital
Sanna Toiviainen-Salo, Helsinki University Hospital
Erja Tyrväinen, Kuopio University Hospital
Leena Valanne, Helsinki University Hospital
Representatives of the scenner suppliers: GE, Philips, Siemens and Toshiba
Preparations of the guide was also supported by the following persons:
Atte Karppinen, Helsinki University Hospital
Antti Markkola, Helsinki University Hospital
Aki Ikonen, Central Finland Central Hospital
Leena Valanne, Helsinki University Hospital
Miika Nieminen, Oulu University Hospital
Juha Nikkinen, Oulu University Hospital
The members of the Paediatric Radiologist Club of the Radiological Society of Finland.
ISSN-L 1799-9510
ISSN 1799-9510 • ISBN 978-952-478-791-8 (pdf)
Contents
1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 5
2. General information................................................................................................... 6
3. Basics of optimizing CT examinations ....................................................................... 7
3.1 Scanning parameters.......................................................................................... 7
3.2 Dose and image quality..................................................................................... 11
3.3 Using radiation shielding................................................................................... 14
3.4 Preparation for the examination........................................................................ 15
3.5 Literature........................................................................................................... 17
4. Vendor specific features........................................................................................... 18
4.1 General Electric (GE)......................................................................................... 18
4.2 Philips................................................................................................................ 19
4.3 Siemens............................................................................................................ 21
4.4 Toshiba.............................................................................................................. 22
5. Head region.............................................................................................................. 24
5.1 Head.................................................................................................................. 24
5.2 Head scanning in the assessment of ventriclular size ...................................... 24
5.3 Scanning the cranial sutures............................................................................. 25
5.4 Literature........................................................................................................... 25
6. Ear, nose and throat region...................................................................................... 26
6.1 Paranasal sinuses.............................................................................................. 26
6.2 Ear region.......................................................................................................... 26
6.3 Facial bones....................................................................................................... 27
6.4 Literature........................................................................................................... 27
7. Neck region.............................................................................................................. 28
8. Chest region............................................................................................................. 29
8.1 Thorax................................................................................................................ 29
8.2 High-resolution CT............................................................................................. 30
8.3 Chest CT-angiography examinations ................................................................. 33
8.4 Literature........................................................................................................... 33
9. Abdominal region..................................................................................................... 34
9.1 CT-angiography of the abdominal region........................................................... 35
9.2 Literature........................................................................................................... 35
10.Trauma..................................................................................................................... 36
10.1 Head trauma...................................................................................................... 36
10.2 Spinal trauma ................................................................................................... 36
10.3 Trauma of thorax and abdomen ........................................................................ 37
10.4 Performing trauma examination........................................................................ 37
10.5 Literature........................................................................................................... 38
3
11. Orthopaedic examinations....................................................................................... 39
11.1 Measuring leg length discrepancy from the planning image............................ 39
11.2 Joints................................................................................................................. 39
11.3 Growth plate scanning for evaluation of growth arrest..................................... 40
11.4 DDH in cast....................................................................................................... 40
11.5 Spine................................................................................................................. 40
12.Hybrid nuclear medicine examinations.................................................................... 41
12.1 Literature........................................................................................................... 42
4
Guidelines for paediatric CT
examinations
1. Introduction
The Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) has previously published two guidebooks in
2005 and 2008 giving guidance for paediatric x-ray procedures, including indications, guidelines
for selecting imaging parameters, optimization and proper use of radiation shields. Although
both of the previous guides briefly discussed also computer tomography (CT) examinations,
this guide reviews more closely and accurately the guidelines and taking into account the
development of CT technology and the changed scanning routines. There is also a separate
guide for determining patient doses in x-ray procedures published in 2004 that gives guidelines
for dose measurements of CT examinations and determines the dose quantities more closely.
This new guide gives the basics of optimizing CT examinations and some technical features
of the CT scanners of the four most common CT manufacturers in Finland. Justifying and
optimizing CT examinations (indications, performing the examination) are discussed covering
each anatomical area, and separately for trauma and orthopaedic examinations. In addition,
guidelines for CT examinations in nuclear medicine (the so called hybrid imaging) are given.
5
2. General information
Children are of special concern in radiation protection because radiation exposure during
childhood causes larger additional cancer risk than a corresponding exposure in adulthood.
Therefore justification and optimization of paediatric examinations needs special attention.
Although we try to avoid imaging techniques that use ionizing radiation in paediatric
examinations, CT is still needed in paediatric imaging.
A paediatric CT examination should always be planned individually for each child. Routine
examination practices without individual consideration should be avoided, and only the series
essential for diagnosis should be done. Fast multi-slice scanners have reduced the need for
sedation, and most examinations can be performed even without a breath hold. The requirements
for a successful examination include: professional performance, carefully planned working
phases and advising the child, parents and other assisting persons in a peaceful atmosphere.
Criteria for a good CT examination include
• adequately versatile, case-specifically tailored imaging practises
• minimizing the length of the scan range according to the indications and anamnesis
received
• acceptable image quality, being assessed case-specifically by the responsible radiologist (e.g.
noise level and slice thickness used on viewing) so that the patient’s radiation exposure
is kept as low as possible.
Guidance for using radiation shielding is given in item 3.3.
6
3. Basics of optimizing CT examinations
Children are smaller than adults and thus the attenuating tissue layer is also smaller, so the
radiation scatters and attenuates less when going through a child than when going through
an adult. Thus lower dose levels may give sufficient image quality.
A patient’s radiation dose is directly proportional to the tube loading (mAs). If the mAs value
is doubled, dose will also be doubled.
A lower tube voltage (80–100 kV) can be used for optimization, especially in paediatric and
contrast imaging. With a lower tube voltage the image contrast will improve and the dose will
reduce as much as tens of percents. At the same time the image noise will increase, but the
increased contrast will compensate for the increased noise, and thus the net effect to image
quality is often positive. It may take a while for a radiologist to get used to the changed image
contrast.
Planning image
The scan range is selected from the planning image (scout image or topogram). The planning
image should be long enough to cover the whole area of interest, but unnecessary long scan
ranges should be avoided. The automatic exposure control (AEC) generally uses the attenuation
information obtained from the planning image to estimate the tube current needed in different
parts of the patient (z direction). It is important not to have any extra attenuating material e.g.
radiation shields, on the selected scan area. The tube voltage should normally be the same as
for the actual scanning so that the AEC works properly.
7
selected from the technical selections (e.g. 0.625 mm). The nominal slice thickness is connected to
the size of the detector elements. Nominal beam width is the nominal slice thickness multiplied
by the number of the slices (e.g. 64 · 0.625 mm = 40 mm).
The reconstructed slice thickness is the slice thickness of the viewed slices created from the
raw data and it can’t be smaller than the nominal slice thickness used for data acquisition
(the size of the detector elements used). The thinner the slices one wants to view, the higher
radiation dose is needed to obtain the desired image quality level (contrast-to-noise ratio).
The smaller the object one wants to view, the thinner reconstructed slice thickness is needed.
Usually the reconstructed slice thickness is chosen according to the indication and the child’s
size, e.g. for small children 2–3 mm and for larger 4–5 mm and for example in angiographies
even 1–2 mm may be needed.
In helical scanning some extra image data is collected at the beginning and at the end of the
scan range for image reconstruction, so the radiation exposure also expands outside the defined
scan range (the so called overranging effect). Proportion of the overranging is relatively larger
with short scan ranges, and can be up to 20% of the total dose. Therefore, in short helical series
using a narrower part of the detector can be considered (so giving a smaller nominal beam
width), thus the overranging will be smaller. However, only about 10% dose reduction can be
achived and the scan time will increase respectively; reducing the beam width to half doubles the
scan time. In some of the new scanners the helical overranging has been blocked with a special
adaptive collimation. This should be verified by the scanner supplier or a medical physics expert.
The size of the scanned and displayed field of view, SFOV and DFOV
The beam size in the scanning plane (axial plane parallel to the patient’s long axis, xy-plane)
can be altered with most of the scanners by choosing the scan field of view (SFOV), e.g. head
or body. For children a smaller SFOV should be used if possible due to their smaller size. The
patient contours should fit inside the SFOV so that the partial volume artefacts can be avoided.
The size of the display field of view (DFOV) defines the objects visible in the reconstructed
images and the final spatial resolution of the image in the axial plane. The axial CT image
consists typically of image matrix of 512 x 512 pixels. The pixels size defines the visibility of
small details, and it gets larger as DFOV is expanded. Accordingly, with a smaller DFOV the
pixel size is reduced and thus spatial resolution gets better but at the same time the noise level
increases. DFOV cannot be larger than SFOV.
CT scanners usually have one or more bowtie filters (beam shaping filters) that affect both
the image quality and dose distribution in the axial plane. They maintain the high radiation
intensity in the thickest and most attenuating part, in the middle of the patient, and lower
radiation intensity on the surface of the patient. Thus a bowtie filter evens the dose and noise
distribution in the axial plane, if the patient is centered properly. Centering the patient carefully
to the isocenter assures the proper performance of the bowtie filters. The shape of the bowtie
filter is defined according to the selected SFOV in the scanning program (if different filters
are available).
8
Automatic exposure control (AEC)
Automatic exposure control (mA modulation, AEC) compensates for beam attenuation at
different parts of the patient by changing the tube current in order to maintain constant
image quality over the whole scan range. The tube current can be changed both while the tube
is rotating around the patient and as the table moves in the direction of patient’s long axis
(z-modulation). The AEC software predicts the patient’s attenuation either beforehand from
the planning images or real time during the scan, or both.
However, maintaining the same image quality is not always reasonable. For example, if there
is more attenuating tissue at the end of the scan range, AEC tends to increase the tube current
on that area, even if a noisier image would be adequate for a diagnosis, such as evaluating lung
tissue at the liver level. Setting the maximum tube current value for modulation can reduce
the patient’s radiation exposure without compromising image quality.
With real time tube current modulation the possible contrast media in the scanned tissues
increases the current and radiation exposure of the patient. Also the use of bismuth shields on
the scanned area can mislead the AEC correspondingly.
AEC is recommended for paediatric body examinations; however it’s very important to know
how the AEC of the particular scanner in question works.
9
Figure 1. Steps of image reconstruction.
The image shows the steps of the CT image formation. The patient’s central axis direction
is called the z direction, and the x-y-plane is called the axial plane. SFOV (scan field of view)
indicates the x-ray beam size in the x-y-plane. DFOV defines the field of view of the displayed
images, and image matrix defines the pixel count in DFOV. The beam size in the direction
of the patient’s long axis, i.e. the nominal beam width, is the nominal size of the detector
elements used in scanning multiplied by their number. From the “raw data” collected during
scanning, displayed slices are created with different calculation processes at the workstation.
The thickness of the viewed slices, i.e. the reconstructed slice thickness, can be selected as
needed.
10
Pitch
Pitch is the shift of the scanner table during one rotation of the x-ray tube divided by the nominal
beam width. With older scanners the speed of the scanner table shift may be described by the
factor table feed (mm) per one rotation of the x-ray tube instead of pitch factor. Pitch can be
calculated by dividing the table feed with the nominal beam width.
When using AEC, the tube current is typically automatically reduced when pitch is reduced
and thus the patient dose and image noise does not change. Accordingly, the tube current will
increase automatically if the pitch value is raised. With AEC, the pitch value can usually only
affect the scan speed. If AEC is not used, one can make the scan faster and reduce the patient
dose by increasing pitch.
With AEC it is reasonable to use pitch 1. For larger children it is possible to use pitch value
higher than 1, to make the scan faster and potentially reduce movement artefacts.
If a low enough dose level cannot be achieved with AEC, dose level can be reduced by using
the lowest possible fixed mA, a short rotation time and high pitch. This approach might be
needed with small patients and when scanning extremities.
If the scanner automatically adjusts the current used while the pitch-factor is changing,
also the tube loading (mAs) used in scanning will be changed. Some scanners indicate the
tube loading using the effective mAs value (Eff.mAs) that is maintained constant against the
pitch value.
Tube loading [ mAs ]
Effective mAs = (1)
pitch
3.2 Dose and image quality
CT dose distribution in patient differs from the (projection-) x-ray imaging. Inner organs typically
receive a relatively higher dose in CT than in a conventional x-ray image. This is why one should
pay attention to the special features of CT scanning while optimizing the scan.
11
Figure 2.
Example of a test phantom that can be used for
assessing low contrast test objects (lighter circles in the
image).
Other technical image quality parameters typically
assessed from CT images include accuracy of CT
numbers (HU-units), image uniformity and resolution of
small high contrast details. High noise level appears as
graininess in the image. Low dose level results in a high
noise level in the image, and makes it harder to see
image details behind the noise.
Image noise is inversely proportional to the square root of dose, i.e. the noise will be reduced
by a factor 0.7 if the dose level is doubled.
Dose quantities
The CT dose volume index CTDIvol describes the average radiation dose on the scanned area,
measured in a standard test phantom. This test phantom is an acrylic cylinder with the diameter
of 16 cm (head) or 32 cm (body). The weighted dose length product DLPw, is the product of
CTDIvol and the length of the scanned area d. In the dose displays of the newest scanners both
CTDIvol and DLPw are usually given. The accuracy of the dose display reading is verified by
regular measurements, as part of the quality assurance of the scanners.
DLPw
DLPw = CTDIvol · d or CTDIvol = (2)
d
12
Figure 3. Dose distribution with the same scan parameters in different size patients and standard
phantoms. (Image by: ImpactMC, CT Imaging GmbH, Erlangen, Germany)
Same scan parameters means that the dose display of the CT scanner would show the
same dose level (measured in 32 cm phantom) for both patients. In this image there is a
child in the upper left and an adult on the upper right corner, a 16 cm phantom (head) in the
lower left and a 32 cm phantom (body) in the lower right corner. The dose distributions are
colour coded so that blue means low dose level and yellow means high dose level. It can be
seen from the image that the dose level indicated by the dose display (i.e. dose measured in
32 cm phantom, lower right) doesn’t describe the real dose distribution in the patients very
well.
Since the CT scanner dose display indicates the radiation dose in a cylindrical standard size
acrylic phantom, it doesn’t take the patient’s size into consideration, and thus it doesn’t indicate
reliably the real radiation dose received by the patient. For this reason, determination of the
patient’s organ doses, effective dose and risk requires evaluation by a medical physicist.
With the same scanning parameters the dose level indicated for a 16 cm phantom is
approximately double compared to dose measured with a 32 cm phantom.
13
When a CT-examination is planned and the scanning parameters are changed, the effect on
the dose parameters can usually be seen on the dose display. The real time mA-modulation
can further change the dose values during the scan. The final dose parameter values can be
reviewed after the examination from the dose report that can be saved to the image archive.
To interpret dose parameters the information of the phantom size used for calculation (16 cm
head or 32 cm body) is needed. If the size of the dose phantom is not given, it should be verified
from the scanner guidebook or requested from the CT-device supplier.
It’s good to remember that the radiation dose of the examination cannot be reliably estimated
based only on the mAs values, since different CT scanners have different kinds of filters
depending on the scanner brand and model, and scanning is performed with different voltage
levels. For these reasons, there may be big differences in the radiation output (mGy/mAs).
Iterative reconstruction
Reconstruction of CT images is based on filtered back projection (FBP). During the last few years
iterative reconstruction has become more common in image reconstruction. In this method image
is reconstructed by inverse problem solving and the image noise is reduced using modelling
and repeating the calculation process. Reduced noise allows lowering the patient dose while
the image quality remains adequate for diagnosis. Images produced by iterative reconstruction
differ in appearance to some extent from CT images produced by FBP.
The iterative reconstruction algorithms and methods used by the scanner manufacturers
(e.g. AIDR, ASiR, iDose, IRIS, Safire, VEO) differ. The latest iterative methods are model based,
taking into account the physical features of the CT device and the scanning procedure. For this
reason, the image quality (especially noise) can be improved considerably. This is a new and fast
developing area of CT technology, and so there aren’t yet publications that cover it, especially
regarding the diagnostic advantages of the model based iterative methods.
The introduction of the iterative reconstruction program must be done by cooperation
between medical physicists and radiologists in order to maintain the image quality diagnostic
and to get the full advantage in dose optimization.
14
Since AEC programs use attenuation
information of the planning image for
calculating the tube current beforehand,
the bismuth shields should be placed after
the planning image. This prevents the
unnecessary increase of the tube current
above the shield. If AEC changes the tube
current also in real time during scanning,
using a shield on the scan range may result
in an unpredictable dose level, so their
use is usually not recommended in these
circumstances.
Lead shields can be used outside the
scan range for protecting e.g. thyroid gland,
mammary gland for girls and testes for boys.
Shields should not be on the selected scanning
area on the planning image, since the AEC
program utilizes the density information
obtained from the planning image.
Bismuth shields affect to AEC acoording to the technique used in each scanner, and thus
the proper use of shields should be assured in operation training.
If the presence of the child’s parent or other companion in the scanning room during the
examination is necessary for a successful examination, the person must be carefully protected
using a lead apron, thyroid gland shield and, if possible, lead glasses. This person should be
placed in a point where scattered radiation is at minimum. Typically most of the radiation
scatters to the 45 degree angle between the patient and scanning aperture, and least beside
the aperture, where the CT scanner’s own structures stop part of the radiation.
15
Practise cooperation
• Before the examination practising e.g. breath hold.
• Getting used to the table movements.
Prepare/plan the scanning carefully
• Defining carefully the scan range from the planning image.
• Patient positioning in the middle of the scanning aperture is very important for the correct
dose modulation function. Off-centering may increase the patient dose considerably and
worsen the image quality.
After the examination it is advisable to pay attention to the child, and it is usually a good idea
to give a small reward, e.g. a sticker or a coloured pencil.
16
3.5 Literature
1 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Use of bismuth shielding for the
purpose of dose reduction in CT scanning. AAPM Public Position Statement, PP 26-A;
2012. http://www.aapm.org/publicgeneral/BismuthShielding.pdf
2. Brenner DJ, Ellis CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal
cancer for pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176 (2): 289–296.
3. Hall P, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D et al. Effect of low doses of ionising radiation in infancy
on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish population based cohort study. BMJ 2004;
328: 19.
4. Kalra MK, Dang P, Singh S, Saini S, Shepard JA. In-plane shielding for CT: Effect of off-
centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance. Korean Journal of
Radiology 2009; 10 (2): 156–163.
5. Land CE, Tokunaga M, Koyama K, Soda M, Preston DL, Nishimori I, Tokuoka S. Incidence of
female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950–1990.
Radiation Research 2003; 160 (6): 707–717.
6. Tack D, Gevenois PA (ed.) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed
tomography. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007.
7. Yu L, Bruesewitz MR. Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT:
principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2011; 31: 853–848.
17
4. Vendor specific features
This section gives more scanner-specific information from scanner manufacturers about matters
related to optimization and paediatric examinations.
SFOV
The selection of SFOV defines the type of the beam shaping filter (small, medium and large).
The lowest possible SFOV setting should always be used in examinations, taking into account
the patient size.
Iterative reconstruction
GE has two different iterative reconstruction methods; ASiR (adaptive statistical iterative
18
reconstruction) and the newer VEO. With ASiR the percentage of the iterative weighting of the
reconstructed image can be chosen, e.g. 40% ASiR weighting uses 40% iterative reconstruction
and 60% conventional reconstruction technique (FBP). In the first ASiR version image noise is
reduced by selecting manually the ASiR percentage. Reduced noise allows lowering the dose by
increasing NI while using modulation, or by decreasing tube current while using fixed scanning
parameters. Conversion factors must be used in calculating the amount of the changes. In the
new ASiR version the desired dose saving percentage is set, compared to the images without ASiR
using DRG (dose reduction guidance). After DRG selection, the scanner calculates automatically
the needed ASiR percentage and tube current so that the noise level stays the same as in images
acquired without ASiR. With small children the appropriately optimized scanning dose level
is already low, and then the performance of DGR should be verified and ASIR percentage set
manually, if required. It is recommend to define the scanner specific practice together with a
medical physicist and an operations consultant from the scanner supplier. Selecting the dose
saving and ASiR percentage is always an indication a specific solution. VEO is a new model
based iterative reconstruction method and the potential dose saving is larger than with ASiR.
The calculation time for VEO is long at present, and this restricts using the method in urgent
examinations, for now.
4.2 Philips
Dose display
In infant protocols’ body region the dose calculation is based on a 16 cm diameter phantom,
in other body area protocols on a 32 cm phantom, and in all head area protocols on a 16 cm
diameter phantom.
Scanning parameters
When small objects are scanned the matrix size is important. Therefore, especially with children
it is reasonable to use 768 x 768 and 1024 x 1024 image matrices. It is beneficial to change also
the resolution to High or Ultra High mode with larger matrix size. Typically in examinations
where a large matrix size can be profitable (e.g. lungs, inner ear, skeleton) mAs value does not
have to be high, because the object’s contrast is high with respect to the surrounding tissues.
Using High and Ultra High mode in paediatric examinations for other than high contrast
objects is not recommended, because it requires increasing the mA value in these examinations.
19
While using a larger matrix size for reconstruction a sharp-filter is used and the slice thickness
is kept low. The effect of changing the scanning parameters on patient dose can be tested before
examination by using the simulation feature.
20
Iterative reconstruction
The user can choose the iDose level in the scanning protocol: 1–7. The iDose level does not
directly indicate the achieved dose saving as a percentage, but the dose reduction is done by
adjusting mAs to match each iDose level according to the examination type. A table created for
optimizing protocols gives the mAs levels corresponding to iDose-level for each examination
type. It is recommended to use at least one degree sharper filter with iDose.
4.3 Siemens
21
Quality Ref mAs value are indicated. When using the Care kV feature, it should be always
ensured that it works appropriately and that it does not (for example), raise the scanning
voltage higher than necessary.
New Siemens scanners have the option of the X-care feature with which the tube current
can be lowered while the tube is in front of the patient and thus dose to e.g. eyes, thyroid or
breasts can be decreased without separate shielding.
Dose display
Siemens scanners calculate dose parameters also for paediatric examinations using the
information based on adult dose phantoms (head 16 cm and body 32 cm).
Iterative reconstruction
When using the iterative reconstruction program a 1–2 grades sharper filter (Kernel) can be
used because an iteratively reconstructed image is typically softer than an image reconstructed
with the back projection method.
4.4 Toshiba
Dose display
Dose display takes the used SFOV size into account: When SFOV is M or lower, the dose display
is based on doses calculated with 16 cm diameter phantom. With higher SFOV values the dose
display is based on a 32 cm diameter phantom.
22
FC13-kernel results in a higher tube current than softer ones, FC12 or FC10.
If the SureExposure 3D AEC is not used, the noise level and minimum and maximum
values for tube current can be selected separately in paediatric examinations. The scanner
then functions between these values. It’s also possible to switch off the xy-modulation and use
only Z-direction modulation.
Iterative reconstruction
The Toshiba AIDR+ automatic iterative calculation also works for paediatric patients.
Miscellaneous
For paediatric patients there are specific FC-kernels (Toshiba’s patent) both for babies (infant)
and child patients (child).
Toshiba scanners have a simulation mode (Scan Simulator) which the effect of can be used
for evaluating the effect of scanning parameters beforehand. Also an example image appears
for which the noise level depends on the scanning parameters used.
23
5. Head region
5.1 Head
The primary method for paediatric brain examinations is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
CT is indicated in an acute situation and when MRI is contra-indicated or in rare special cases
(e.g. CT angiography in imaging of an acute vascular lesion). Ultrasound examination with
good technique through anterior fontanelle is usually adequate for babies e.g. in assessing
ventricular size and cerebral problems due to prematurity. However, it should be remembered
that ultrasound does not reliably exclude all types of traumatic lesions possibly requiring
neurosurgical intervention. Cerebral ischemia in children is examined with MRI, and CT
perfusion imaging used for adults should not be used for children because of the excessive
radiation dose.
Head trauma imaging is discussed within item 10.1.
Indications
• Suspected acute brain incident (e.g. intracranial haemorrhage).
• Imaging ventricular size in patients with ventriculo-peritoneal shunt if the fontanelle is
already closed and MRI is not available (see item 5.2).
• Surgical intervention planning in cases of premature closure of the cranial sutures (see
item 5.3).
Indications
• Suspected ventricular dilatation in ventriculo-peritoneal shunt malfunction.
24
5.3 Scanning the cranial sutures
Diagnosis of premature closure of the cranial sutures is usually clinical (Duodecim 2007).
If necessary, ultrasound examination or plain x-ray can be used according to radiologist’s
instructions. Ultrasound (at least a 7.5 MHz probe) has been shown to be reliable especially
for examination of single sutures (e.g. plagiocephaly). CT is usually needed only for surgical
planning.
5.4 Literature
1. Dunning J et al. Derivation of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of
important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Archives of Disease in
Childhood 2006; 91: 885–891.
2. Kuppermann N et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important
brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009; 374 (9696):
1160–1170.
25
6. Ear, nose and throat region
ENT region is usually scanned with CT to examine the bony structures; so the natural contrast
of bone allows low scanning parameters. A low-dose technique should be used especially when
scanning paediatric facial bones and paranasal sinuses. Scanning parameters should be
optimized according to patient’s size. With good optimization the patient dose might be as low
as with a few conventional radiographic images of the same region.
Indications
• Surgical planning (FESS-TT): surgical mapping before operation, low-dose-CT
• Complicated sinusitis (epidural abcess or orbital subperiosteal abcess): surgical mapping
before operation if needed, to allow surgery in navigator control: low dose CT
• Suspected tumour: imaging bony structures in addition to MRI, good quality images of
both bone and soft tissues are needed.
Indications
• Cochlear implantation surgery: both MRI and CT are performed.
• Further imaging of an inner ear anomaly in addition to MRI. Many of structural anomalies
of the inner ear, such as anomalous auditory ossicles, or auditory canal atresia can only
be visualized with CT.
• Cholesteathoma is diagnosed clinically, imaging is needed only in special cases; CT is used
mostly for surgical planning.
• Complicated infection (e.g. subperiosteal or epidural abcess, sinus thrombosis): MRI is the
first-line examination for children, but CT might be needed to examine bone destruction.
26
Performing the examination
In spite of developed reconstruction techniques, careful positioning of the patient head is
necessary to keep the scan length short in order to minimize radiation dose. Head should be
positioned straight to scan the temporal bones within the shortest possible scan range, from the
tip of the mastoids to the upper edge of the tympanic cavity. 0.5 mm slices are reconstructed in
true axial (skull base plane) and coronal planes. Both bone and soft tissue algorithms are used
to examine inflammatory lesions and congenital anomalies.
Indications
• Suspected clinically significant (requiring surgical treatment) facial bone fracture: low-
dose examination.
6.4 Literature
1. Morales JL, Skowronski PP, Thaller SR. Management of pediatric maxillary fractures.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2010; 21 (4): 1226–1233.
2. Mulkens TH, Broers C, Fieuws S, Termote JL, Bellnick P. Comparison of effective doses for
low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children. American Journal
of Roentgenology 2005; 184 (5): 1611–1618.
27
7. Neck region
CT of the neck is indicated only in special cases. The primary modalitities used in the examination
of this area are ultrasound and MRI. Ultrasound may not demonstrate the deep inflammatory
lesions, and in children the poor visualization of fat lines makes the soft tissue differentiation
in CT difficult. If MRI is not possible, contrast medium enhanced CT is recommended.
Spine trauma imaging is discussed in item 10.2.
28
8. Chest region
Helical scanning is usually used when performing CT examinations of the chest. Exception is
HRCT examination, which is performed with single thin slices of the whole lung or the region
of interest.
The use of contrast medium should be considered case-by-case basis. The use of i.v. contrast
may help to delineate mediastinal structures especially in small children, but should be
considered individually. With older children, and especially in control studies, it is rarely needed.
Contrast medium is not useful in detecting metastases in lung parenchyma.
CT angiography is an alternative option to MRI examination especially when examining
neonates (because of their small vascular structures). Lowering the tube voltage (kV) increases
image contrast, and is recommended especially in angiography. Lowering kV may reduce the
patient dose, but the increased noise may require increasing the tube loading (mAs).
Spine trauma imaging is discussed in item 10.2.
8.1 Thorax
Chest CT is usually used to diagnose and follow-up metastatic disease, but MRI is often better
in diagnosing mediastinal tumors. This is especially true for posterior mediastinal tumors
where involvement of the spinal canal can be crucial information. For pulmonary abscesses,
especially in follow-up, the accuracy of MRI is often adequate. When assessing pleural fluid,
ultrasound is the modality of choice, and CT has not been shown to give more information in
the characterization of the fluid.
Imaging of the bony structures is discussed in items 10.3. (Trauma) and 11.5 (Spine).
Indications
• Complicated infection
– For lung abscess detection/follow-up MRI – examination must be considered.
– Ultrasound for pleural fluid detection and characterization.
• Detection and follow-up of tumors and metastases. MRI is often a better choice, especially
with posterior mediastinal and chest wall tumors.
• Examination of parencymal and mediastinal structural anomalies (MRI examination
should be considered when possible). Ultrasound is often the best modality to visualize
the thymus.
• CT angiography:
– small vascular structures (less than 4 mm)
– pulmonary embolism
– vascular structures and heart, when MRI is not possible due to a long sedation or
metal implants.
29
Performing the examination
With modern multi-slice equipment and fast scanning, breath hold is not necessary with small
children. Sedation often provokes athelectasis which may be difficult to prevent. In such cases
examining the child in prone position may aerate the athelectatic posterior parts of the lung.
Scan range is based on the indication. Usually the whole lung region from apices to just
below the pleural angles is scanned, but over-extending the scan range should be avoided. The
good natural contrast of the lungs allows the use of both low tube voltage (kV) and loading
(mAs) to reduce the patient dose. Tube voltage of 80 kV is usually adequate for children under
10 kg and 100 kV for children under 60 kg.
The need of i.v.contrast medium depends on the indication; lung metastases can be visualized
without. However, contrast medium should be used at least in the diagnosis of complicated
pneumonia and tumors. It can also be used to outline the mediastinal structures, especially
with small children (thymus). Unionized iodinated contrast medium with usually 300 mg I /
ml is used when needed. Volume of contrast medium is 1.5–2 ml/kg under 20 kg and 1–1.5 ml/
kg over 20 kg up to 50 ml. Injection rate depends on the size of the child, the vessel caliber and
the indication of the scanning; usually 1–3 ml/s. An automatic injector pump should be used,
if possible. Scan delay should be set to 20–30 s (depending on the size of the child), in order to
visualize all vascular structures.
8.2 High-resolution CT
High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) with thin interspaced slices is a valuable tool
in the diagnosis of diseases of the lung parenchyma and the airways. HRCT is more sensitive
than plain film chest x-ray in the detection of diffuse interstitial lung disease, and more accurate
in characterizing them. The spectrum of the diffuse interstitial lung diseases is different with
children than with adults. Both clinical and radiological presentations are less specific with
children, and even histopathological differential diagnosis is not always straightforward; thus
accurate diagnosis is challenging.
The aim of an HRCT examination is to assess the presence and extent of the lung pathology,
characterize the lesions, restrict differential diagnosis and demonstrate a good site for biopsy.
The secondary pulmonary lobule is a fundamental unit of lung structure, the smallest
structure that is surrounded by connective tissue septa and can be visualized in HRCT. It
consists of approximately ten pulmonary acini with vessels, and understanding its anatomy is
essential in interpreting the HRCT examination and classifying the findings.
30
• Abnormal but non-specific chest radiograph
– Ill-defined nodules, opacities or suspected interstitial lung disease
– biopsy site selection.
• Detection of bronchiectasis.
• Detection of sequelae of infection in a child with persistent symptoms
– bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) or bronchiectasis.
• Cystic fibrosis: staging, response to therapy (MRI feasible in follow-up).
• BPD (bronchopulmonary dysplasia): evaluation of the severity of the disease in special
cases.
• Follow-up of diffuse interstitial lung disease or airway disease.
HRCT technique
Breath hold is necessary to achieve good quality images, and this is why small children usually
need general anaesthesia and scanning in breath control. Good cooperation with the anaesthesia
personnel is important. For a successful examination the interval between breath holds can be
increased e.g. to 15–20 seconds.
If general anaesthesia is not possible due to the child’s condition, the examination can be
performed during quiet breathing, but with less accuracy. For expiratory images the child can be
scanned in lateral decubitus position, when the non-dependent lung appears as if in inspiration
and the dependent lung as if in expiration.
The axial HRCT images (1–1.5 mm) are reconstructed on a high spatial resolution algorithm
(edge/bone) in inspiration and expiration. The acquisition time should be as short as possible
in order to avoid the motion artefacts. The suitable slice interval in primary examination is
usually 10 mm in inspiration. In follow-up examinations the slice interval can be extended to
15–20 mm. The 3–5 expiratory slices are usually obtained so that the highest is acquired above
the aortic arch and the lowest approximately 1 cm above the upper diaphragm. The purpose
of the expiratory scan is to show the air trapping, thus worse image quality is acceptable than
in inspiration scans. This should be considered when adjusting the scan parameters. It may
be necessary to acquire few additional scans in a prone position due to athelectasis of the
posterior lung.
Image windowing should be adjusted according to the viewing devices and conditions.
However, it is important to always use the same windowing, to allow image comparisons.
If volumetric acquisition is needed in addition to HRCT, adequate HRCT images can usually
be reconstructed with modern scanners from the helical scan raw data, and a separate scan
is not needed. Since with edge-enhanced algorithms the image noise is higher, an increase of
the tube current may be necessary to maintain adequate diagnostic quality. Contrast medium
is not used with HRCT.
31
Figures 4 and 5. Example images of HRCT slices. The upper is during inspiration and the lower during
expiration.
32
8.3 Chest CT-angiography examinations
Cardiac structures can be better examined with ultrasound than CT, but the visualization of
the vascular structures can be inadequate. In neonates especially, abnormal vessels can be so
small that the resolution of MRI is not adequate either. CT examination provides information
also about the bronchi and lung parenchyma, which can be useful especially with neonates.
Indications
• Small vascular structures (less than 4 mm).
• Pulmonary embolism.
• Heart, when MRI is not possible due to long sedation or metal implants.
8.4 Literature
1. Copley SJ, Padley SP. High-resolution CT on paediatric lung disease. European Radiology
2001; 11 (12): 2564–2575.
2. García-Peña P, Boixadera H, Barber I et al. Thoracic findings of systemic diseases at High-
resolution CT in children. Radiographics 2011; 31 (2): 465–482.
3. Klussmann M, Owens C. HRCT in pediatric diffuse interstitial lung disease – a review
for 2009. Pediatric Radiology 2009; 39 Suppl 3: 471–481.
4. Kuhn JP, Brody AS. High-Resolution CT of pediatric lung disease. Radiologic Clinics of
North America 2002; 40 (1): 89–110.
5. Webb WR. Thin-section CT of the secondary pulmonary lobule: Anatomy and the image
– The 2004 Fleischner lecture. Radiology 2006; 239 (2): 322–338.
33
9. Abdominal region
Ultrasound is the modality of choice in paediatric abdominal problems. MRI has widely replaced
CT in abdominal imaging in paediatrics, although long scanning times often require general
anaesthesia. When examining abdominal tumours, CT is seldom used, and also in cancer follow-
up a combination of chest CT and abdominal MRI is good practice.
The small amount of abdominal fat and thus poor natural contrast make the visualization
of different structures challenging, and thus i.v. contrast medium is usually necessary. There is
no clear consensus in the literature about the filling of the intestine with radiolucent or radio-
opaque contrast medium, and the need depends on the indication of the scan. In Finland the
diagnosis of appendicitis is usually based on clinical findings, and ultrasound can be used to aid
in differential diagnostics. When examining paediatric acute abdomen, CT is seldom needed.
The exception is urinary tract calculi, which are rare in children. Then CT is performed as a
complementary examination to ultrasound with very low dose and without i.v. contrast medium.
To image abdominal vascular structures CT is still an important method, although the
indication is often related to complicated transplantation surgery. Also the use of gadolinium
in MRI examination can be contraindicated for these patients, because of the related risk of
nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NFS).
Indications
• Trauma with clinical signs of abdominal injury or an unstable patient.
• Complicated infection when ultrasound does not give enough information and MRI is not
available.
• Suspected urinary tract stones, if ultrasound does not give enough information (low-dose
examination without contrast medium).
34
to calculate the injection rate (ml/s) have been published, e.g.: weight (as kilograms) · 0.1 or
(injection volume (ml)) / (delay(s)-15 s).
Enhancement of the liver parenchyma is sufficient, when contrast is seen in the hepatic veins.
According to some studies, it takes 50 s from the beginning of the injection for small children
and 60–70 s for older children. If automatic measurement of the contrast medium concentration
is used, the ROI is placed on the upper part of the abdominal aorta, and scanning is started –
depending on the child’s size 30–50 s after the concentration in the aorta is sufficient.
Scan region is from diaphragm to symphysis, but depends on the indication. Scanning the
urinary tract is started from the upper end of the kidneys. Over-extending the range should
be avoided.
Reconstructed slice thickness of 2–3 mm is often good; even 4–5 mm (especially for bigger
children) is possible. Image reconstruction is usually soft tissues weighted. However, in trauma
cases bone reconstructions are also needed. Lung windowing may aid in showing air outside the
bowel. Reconstructions should be done also in the coronal plane, which may help in assessing
the bowel loops.
With children the small amount of abdominal fat makes assessing the bowel and its walls
more difficult. Sometimes it is impossible to differentiate the appendix from the intestine.
Differentiating a slightly inflamed intestinal wall from normal may also be tricky.
Indications
• Scanning abdominal vascular anomalies in special cases, if ultrasound does not provide
enough information and MRI is not possible or its resolution is not sufficient.
9.2 Literature
1. Frush DP. Pediatric abdominal CT angiography. Pediatric Radiology 2008; 38 Suppl 2:
259–266.
35
10. Trauma
CT has a central role in the imaging of severely injured children. The primary purpose of
imaging is to recognize life threatening injuries. However, paediatric patients should not be
scanned routinely with CT except in cases of high-energy trauma. The need of CT should always
be considered case-by-case basis. Instead of whole body scanning the paediatric trauma CT is
often focused to for example abdominal area.
Although the sensitivity of ultrasound is only about 55% also in children, combining it to
clinical examination can raise the sensitivity to 100%. However, ultrasound has a remarkably
larger role in paediatric imaging than in adults. When examining haemodynamically stable
patients and FAST US (focused assessment with sonography for trauma) is found normal, a
more thorough SLOW (second look if otherwise well) ultrasound examination has been suggested
instead of CT.
The decision of CT examination is done based on clinical findings (pain, haemodynamic
stability, neurologic signs). Also the related injuries affect the decision, e.g. spinal or pelvic
fracture may require CT.
36
Indications
Cervical spine
• Clinical suspicion of cervical spine fracture.
• Plain radiography equivocal or suspicion of unstable fracture.
In a multi-centre study (Leonard et al 2010) the recommended criteria which indicate increased
risk of cervical fracture were:
• loss of consciousness in trauma patient (also intoxication)
• focal neurologic findings
• complain of neck pain
• Torticollis
• substantial injury of the body
• predisposing condition (e.g. Down’s syndrome, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (SED))
• diving as trauma mechanism
• high-energy injury.
Indications
• Clinically suspected thoracic injury or laceration of parenchymal abdominal organ.
• Further evaluation of a parenchymal organ injury detected in ultrasound examination.
• Further imaging of findings in chest radiography.
37
varies significantly depending on the child’s size and haemodynamics (ca 10–30 s for thoracic
and 50–70 s for abdominal region). Alternatively a two phase injection (2 ml/kg) can be used.
First 80% of the contrast is injected to enhance the abdominal organs and then 20% just before
the scan to enhance also the major vessels at the same time. The whole body is scanned as one
stack. Thus the abdominal organs are enhanced and there is also good contrast in the major
vessels. If renal collection system injury related to kidney trauma is suspected, delayed scan is
performed at kidney level after 5–15 minutes to see the possible extravasation of the contrast.
When examining babies, the injection rate of 1–1.5 ml/s is usually enough, and in older children
2–3 ml/s. Injection rate of 4–5 ml/s may be sometimes be needed but usually only in teenagers.
10.5 Literature
1. Dunning J et al. Derivation of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of
important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Archives of Disease in
Childhood 2006; 91: 885–891.
2. Kuppermann N et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically- important
brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009; 374 (9696):
1160–1170.
3. Leonard JC et al. Factors associated with cervical spine injury in children after blunt
trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2011; 58 (2): 145–155.
4. Maguire JL, Boutis K, Uleryk EM et al. Should a head-injured child receive a head CT
scan? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules. Pediatrics 2009; 124: e145–154.
5. Scaife E, Rollins MD. Managing radiation risk in the evaluation of the pediatric trauma
patient. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery 2010; 19: 252–256.
38
11. Orthopaedic examinations
Orthopaedic CT examinations are mainly performed for the surgical intervention planning.
The natural contrast of bones usually allows low tube current (80 kV) also for bigger patients.
On the other hand, it may be necessary to increase the scanning parameters if there is metal
inside the scan range from previous operations.
Indications
• Evaluation of leg length discrepancy, when epiphyseodesis is planned, and the clinically
determined difference is more than 2 cm.
11.2 Joints
It is difficult to place only one joint (e.g. ankle) in the isocentre of the scanner so that AEC
would work properly, and thus fixed scanning parameters instead of AEC should be considered.
Indications
• Further evaluation of fracture of the articular surface to plan surgical treatment.
39
11.3 Growth plate scanning for evaluation of growth arrest
Indications
• Evaluating the size of growth plate fusion detected in radiography, for surgical treatment
planning.
Indications
• Verifying the position of the femoral head in a child with pelvic cast for DDH, when MRI
is not possible.
11.5 Spine
Indications
• Equivocal or unclear fracture in plain radiography.
• Suspected unstable spinal fracture.
• Precise anatomical clarification for surgical planning for scoliosis or vertebral anomalies.
40
12. Hybrid nuclear medicine examinations
Computer tomography can be utilized in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging for three different
purposes:
• attenuation correction
• anatomical localisation of the radio-medicine uptake
• as a diagnostic examination.
These differ from each other regarding the required image quality and thus the patient dose.
The required image quality must be defined beforehand in order to optimize the examination.
The predefined paediatric protocols of the device manufacturer are typically designed to produce
a good image quality, and they are not optimized in relation to the patient dose.
An attenuation correction map of the scan region can be produced with the CT equipment.
It allows correction of the radio-medicine’s radiation attenuation in the patient. The electron
density information of the CT image is used to create the attenuation correction map. Scanning
with very low current and dose is sufficient to produce the attenuation map. Practically, the
smallest scanning parameters that the CT scanner can produce can usually be chosen, especially
with small children. Radiation attenuation in small children is minimal and for this reason
in SPECT (single-photon emission tomography) examinations the attenuation correction is
usually not necessary. Computational attenuation correction methods can be used for fairly
homogenous objects (e.g. a child’s head). Attenuation correction is always required to analyze
PET (positron emission tomography) images.
To localize the pathological radio-medicine uptake, image quality should be good enough to
distinguish the anatomical structures. This image quality is often sufficient also to replace the
diagnostic control CT examination, especially in chest region.
Diagnostic image quality in nuclear medicine CT-examination is required only if it can
replace the diagnostic CT examination, that would be otherwise required. For diagnostic
purposes a noisier image quality is usually adequate in paediatric CT examinations than in
adults’ examinations. The required image quality should be optimized together with a radiologist
specialized in paediatric imaging. When defining the image quality, it should also be considered
whether a CT examination is needed e.g. for external radiotherapy dose calculation or future
image fusions. Using contrast with attenuation correction scanning may cause over-correction.
Therefore, i.v. contrast cannot usually be used with attenuation correction scanning.
Indications
• Most children’s cancer types accumulate F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (F-18-FDG) which
is the most common marker used in PET-CT. In primary diagnostics PET-CT should be
considered with
– Hodgkin’s lymphoma
– non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a atypical primary tumour/metastases
– extramedullary leucaemia, if primary tumour is not known
– soft tissue sarcoma
41
– MIBG negative neuroblastoma
– yolk sac tumour
– Langerhans cell histocytosis.
• Follow-up imaging is indicated only if recurrence or metastazing affects the patient’s
treatment. With recurrent disease PET-CT can be used to plan radiotherapy or determine
the biopsy site.
• For treatment response PET-CT should be considered in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, when
a poor response is suspected in conventional imaging. Information about the activity of
the remaining tumour is then achieved.
• Combining CT to paediatric SPECT examination is rare, but in some cases, e.g. gamma
scanning of the stomach mucosa, CT localization can give more clarity.
12.1 Literature
1. Alessio AM, Kinahan PE et al. Weight-based, low-dose pediatric whole-body PET/CT
protocols. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009; 50 (10): 1570–1577.
2. Antoch G, Feudenberg LS, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin JF. To Enhance or Not to Enhance?
18F-FDG and CT Contrast Agents in Dual-Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear
Medicine 2004; 45 Suppl 1: 56S–65S.
3. Barrington SF, Begent J, Lynch T, et al. Guidelines for the use of PET-CT in children.
Nuclear Medicine Communications 2008; 29 (5): 418–424.
42
4. Chawla SC et al. Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with
malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review. Pediatric Radiology 2010; 40 (5):681–686.
Epub 2009 Dec 5.
5. Dacian V. Bonta, Richard L. Wahl. Overcorrection of iodinated contrast attenuation in
SPECT-CT: Phantom studies. Medical Physics 2010; 37: 4897–4901.
6. Fahey FH, Palmer MR, Strauss KJ, Zimmerman RE, Badawi RD, Treves ST. Dosimetry and
adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study. Radiology
2007; 243 (1): 96–104.
43
Cover image: Sampsa Kaijaluoto, layout: Marja Niskanen. September 2012.
ISBN 978-952-478-791-8
ISSN 1799-9510
Helsinki 2013