0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views5 pages

Respro Rating Form

The document is a research proposal evaluation form used to assess the quality and completeness of a research proposal based on specific criteria. It lists the preliminary parts of a research study and provides a scoring rubric to evaluate elements like the background, problem statement, theoretical framework, research design, and ethical considerations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views5 pages

Respro Rating Form

The document is a research proposal evaluation form used to assess the quality and completeness of a research proposal based on specific criteria. It lists the preliminary parts of a research study and provides a scoring rubric to evaluate elements like the background, problem statement, theoretical framework, research design, and ethical considerations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Colegio San Agustin – Bacolod

BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT


SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Benigno S. Aquino Drive, Bacolod City

RESEARCH PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM

Research Title: Date:


Research Members:

OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the quality and completeness of a research proposal based on specific criteria.

Preliminary Excellent Proficient Developing Score Remarks


Parts of the 7-10 points 4-6 points 1-3 points
Research
Background of Comprehensive Background Inadequate or
the Study background provided but missing
provided, lacks depth or background
demonstrating relevance. information.
clear
understanding of
the research
context and
relevance.
Statement of Problem Problem Problem
the Problem statement is well- statement is statement is
defined, clear, partially clear but unclear or
and specific, lacks specificity. missing.
highlighting the
research gap or
issue
Hypothesis Clear and Hypothesis is No hypothesis
testable unclear or not provided.
hypothesis logically derived.
provided,
logically derived
from the problem
statement.
Theoretical Comprehensive Theoretical Theoretical
Framework explanation and framework is framework is
application of mentioned but absent or not
relevant theories not well- relevant.
to the study explained or
provided. connected to the
study.

Conceptual Clear and Conceptual Conceptual


Framework relevant framework is framework is
conceptual mentioned but missing or
framework lacks clarity or irrelevant.
provided, connection to the
effectively study.
guiding the
study's
conceptualization
and analysis.

Page 1 of 4
Significance of Comprehensive Significance is Significance of
the Study discussion of mentioned but the study is not
the study's lacks depth or addressed.
significance, relevance.
including
potential
contributions to
the field and
practical
applications.
Scope and Clear and well- Scope and Scope and
Delimitation of defined scope delimitation are delimitation are
the Study and delimitation mentioned but unclear or
provided, lack specificity missing.
outlining the or coherence.
boundaries and
limitations of the
study.
Definition of Comprehensive Definitions are Key terms are
Terms definition of key provided but lack not defined.
terms provided, clarity or
enhancing reader completeness.
understanding.
Related Extensive and Some related Limited or no
Literature relevant related literature related literature
literature mentioned but discussed.
discussed, lacks depth or
demonstrating a relevance.
thorough review
of existing
knowledge.
Research Clear and Research design Research design
Design appropriate is mentioned but is unclear or not
research design lacks detail or appropriate for
provided, with justification. the study.
detailed
explanation and
justification.
Participants of Clear and Participant Participant
the Study detailed information information is
description of provided but missing or
participants lacks detail insufficient.
provided, or
including justification.
selection criteria
and justification.
Research Detailed Research Research
Instrument description of instrument instrument is not
research mentioned but mentioned.
instrument lacks detail or
provided, appropriateness.
including validity
and reliability
measures.
Data Gathering Clear and Data gathering Data gathering
Procedure detailed data procedure procedure is
gathering mentioned but unclear or
procedure lacks detail or missing.
provided, coherence.
outlining specific
steps and
methodologies.

Page 2 of 4
Data Analysis Clear and Data analysis Data analysis
appropriate data plan mentioned plan is missing.
analysis plan but lacks detail or
provided, appropriateness.
demonstrating
alignment with
research
objectives and
methodologies.
Ethical Comprehensive Some ethical Ethical
Considerations discussion of considerations considerations
ethical mentioned but are not
considerations lack depth or addressed.
provided, relevance.
addressing
potential risks
and measures to
ensure ethical
conduct
throughout the
study.
References Comprehensive Some relevant Few or no
and relevant references references
references provided but provided, or
provided, may lack depth references are
demonstrating or variety. not relevant to
a thorough the study.
review of
existing
literature and
supporting the
research
proposal
effectively.

Total Score:

Overall Feedback:

Evaluated by:

PEARL JOY P. CALVEZ, LPT


RESEARCH ADVISER

Page 3 of 4
Individual Rating Form for Collaborative Task

The leader of the group must download and accomplish this Rating Form. Be guided by the rubric in rating your members.
This will be worth 20 points and will be encoded in your Written Works.

Group Leader:
Grade and Section:
Members Specific Contribution/Remarks Rating

Page 4 of 4
Page 5 of 4

You might also like