Module 2
Module 2
Overview:
In this module, you will learn about the different principles governing the
development of high quality assessment tools. High quality assessment indicates
measures that would bring about performance of students in relation to targeted
learning outcomes. This means that assessment tools developed are well constructed
which truly measure the expected learning performance of the students.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this module, you are expected to:
Learning Outcomes
1. Discuss the importance of developing clear learning outcomes
2. Distinguish and discuss the types of learning outcomes
3. Construct learning outcomes based on the three domains of learning
Learning Tasks/Activities
1. Find the meaning of learning outcomes. How is it different from learning
objectives?
Learning objectives are specific statements that describe what learners
should be able to do or know. Learning outcomes are broader
statements that describe the overall knowledge, skills, or attitudes
learners are expected to gain. Objectives focus on specific content and
activities, while outcomes focus on broader goals and impacts.
2. Learning objectives/outcomes uses statements in behavioral terms. Explain
why.
Learning objectives or outcomes are stated in behavioral terms to
provide clarity, measurability, and accountability in describing what
learners should be able to do or achieve. Behavioral terms make
objectives clear, measurable, and align instructional activities,
assessments, and learning resources with the intended outcomes.For
questions 3 to 5, examine the words listed under behavioral or non-
behavioral terms and answer the questions that follows.
BEHAVIORAL NOT BEHAVIORAL
Create Prepare Identify Know
Develop Compare Aware
Distinguish Give. Understand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0nyGOfFiU
Tabigne, Charlene (2013).https://prezi.com/qjxmqggr-amp/the-principles-of-high-
quality-assessment/
Neptune, Amia (2012) https://www.slideshare.net/Neptune_Ayuste/58519966-
reviewofprinciplesofhighqualityassessment
https://www.oxnardcollege.edu/committees/curriculum-committee/student-learning-
outcomes-definition
Blooms, Benjamin Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book :Cognitive Domain,
2nd Ed. June 1984
Krathwohl, D.R, Bloom, B.B. Masia (1964) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:
Handbook II Affective Domain. New York: David Mckay Co.
https://www.rcep.net/Education-Providers/All-About-Learning-Objectives-1248.htm
https://www.pinterest.ph/pin/267190190374058165/?nic_v2=1a5aMHWlZ
Lesson 2.1. Appropriateness of Assessment Methods
Lesson Summary
Assessment of students’ performance is not only based on learning outcomes
but it should possess the following properties of assessment such as: Assessment
should be continuous, it should be comprehensive; it should be diagnostic and
functional; it should be fair and just; it should be practical and efficient and ethical.
These properties or principles are essential to make appropriate and relevant
assessment tools. These will help make our test questions valid and reliable.
Learning Outcomes:
1. Identify and describe the different properties of assessment methods
2. Critique classroom situations applying the principle of assessment
Activity
1. Research in the Internet the following and explain each one of them:
a) Assessment is:
1.Continuous - Assessment is continuous to monitor student
progress and provide ongoing feedback, allowing for timely
instructional adjustments and supporting continuous learning.
2. Comprehensive - Assessment is comprehensive because it
provides a complete and holistic view of student performance,
considering multiple dimensions of learning and capturing a
wide range of knowledge, skills, and abilities.
3. Diagnostic and functional - Assessment is diagnostic and
functional because it identifies areas of strength and areas for
improvement, allowing for targeted instructional interventions that
support student learning and growth.
4. Fair and just - Assessment is fair and just because it provides
equitable opportunities for all students to demonstrate their
knowledge and skills, regardless of their background or
circumstances.
5. Practical and efficient - Assessment is practical and efficient
because it optimizes resources and time, allowing for effective
measurement of student progress while minimizing unnecessary
burden on both educators and learners.
6. Ethical - Assessment is ethical because it upholds the
principles of fairness, integrity, and respect for students' rights,
ensuring that evaluations are conducted in a just and unbiased
manner.
2. Consider the figure given below. Is it a fair assessment? Why?
The assessment of climbing a tree may not be fair for all the animals
involved. Each animal has its own unique abilities and characteristics that
make climbing a tree more or less feasible. While a monkey might excel at
climbing trees naturally, the bird may have an advantage in flying, the
elephant in strength, the fish in swimming, and the dog in agility.
Assessing them solely based on their ability to climb a tree would not be
fair as it does not take into account their individual strengths and natural
abilities. A fair assessment would consider the unique capabilities and
characteristics of each animal and evaluate them in a way that aligns with
their natural abilities and strengths.
Learning Outcome
1. Determine the validity of the test
Learning Tasks/Activities
1. Define the following terms ( 2points each ):
a) Validity
Is the extent to which a test measures, what it claims to measure. It is
vital for a test to be valid in order for the results to be accurately
applied and interpreted.
b) Face validity
The extent to which the measured variable appears to be an adequate
measure of the conceptual variable
c. Content validity
The extent to which the measured variable appears to have adequately
covered the full domain of the conceptual variable
d) Construct validity
The extent to which a measured variable actually measures the
conceptual variable that it is designed to measure
Learning outcomes:
1. Define reliability
2. Distinguish the different types of determining the reliability of the test
3. Calculate the reliability of the test
Learning Tasks/Activities
1. Unlocking of Difficulty ( 5 points )
Fill out the diagram below about your understanding on reliability. What comes into
your mind when we say reliability or reliable?
Trustworthiness
Consistent
2. What are the different methods of determining the reliability of the test?
There are several methods to determine the reliability of a test:
Test-Retest Reliability
Administering the same test to the same group of individuals at two different
points in time and correlating their scores to see if they are consistent.
Parallel Forms Reliability
Administering two different but equivalent forms of the test to the same group
of individuals and correlating their scores.
Split-Half Reliability
Dividing the test into two halves (e.g., odd vs. even items) and correlating the
scores obtained on each half.3. Search in the internet or in reference materials how to
calculate the reliability of the test.
Internal Consistency Reliability
Measuring the extent to which all items on the test measure the same
underlying construct, typically using techniques like Cronbach's alpha.
Inter-Rater Reliability
Assessing the agreement between two or more raters or scorers who evaluate
the same responses or performances independently.
These methods help gauge the consistency and stability of a test's results, thereby
determining its reliability for measuring the intended construct.
3.1 . How do we interpre and analyze the value of reliability of the test
Interpretation and Analysis of Reliability Value:
Cronbach's Alpha:
Values range from 0 to 1.
Higher values indicate greater reliability.
Typically, a value above 0.7 is considered acceptable for most purposes, while values
above 0.8 are preferred for high-stakes assessments.
3.2 Given the following problems, determine the reliability of the test.
a) Ms. Celia administered her test in Sociology to 10 students. The first form
of the test was conducted at exactly 8:00 AM. After two hours, the test papers
in the first form were collected, and thereafter, the second form similar in
content, was given. Their scores in the first and second forms are shown
below;
First Form 24 35 29 34 26 15 30 32 19
27
Second Form 17 30 25 30 24 13 29 30 17
24
Reliability Calculation for Ms. Celia's Sociology Test:
Method:Test-retest reliability
Calculation:Correlate scores of the two forms
Interpretation:Higher correlation indicates higher reliability.
3.3 Mr. Romulo conducted a 40-item Science test to his 10 students. Their
scores in the first half and in the second half are shown below. Find the
reliability of the whole test.
First Half 16 18 20 8 10 13 19 19 19 16
Second half 15 13 18 9 8 10 17 16 17 15
Reliability Calculation for Mr. Romulo's Science Test:
Method: Split-half reliability
Calculation: Split the test into halves and correlate the scores of the two
halves.
Interpretation: Higher correlation indicates higher reliability.
3.4 Dr. Reyes had a test in English to 12 students. After two days, the same test
was conducted to the same group of students whose scores are as follow;
scores in the first and second tests are given as follows; ( Assignment)
1st test 35 36 27 43 43 37 28 38 40 38 42 36
2nd test 30 38 25 40 40 36 23 41 38 27 38 30
Reliability Calculation for Dr. Reyes's English Test:
Method: Test-retest reliability
Calculation: Correlate scores of the first and second tests.
Interpretation: Higher correlation indicates higher reliability.
3.5 Ms. Cruz gave a 30 -item science test to her pupils. The scores of her pupils
are shown below. What is the reliability of the test?
Pupils 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Scores 24 28 29 22 17 18 16 24 23 24 15 18
Reliability Calculation for Ms. Cruz's Science Test:
Method: Split-half reliability or Cronbach's alpha (if the entire test was given
to each student)
Calculation: Split the test into halves or calculate Cronbach's alpha using the
given scores.
Interpretation: Higher correlation or alpha value indicates higher reliability.