Transmission and Distribution Design
Transmission and Distribution Design
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
PURWANCHAL CAMPUS
DHARAN-8, SUNSARI
NEPAL
A Report On
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBMITTED TO:
For Nc = 1 66 kV
For Nc = 2 765 kV
V eco =
√ 100 200∗1000
+
1.6 2∗cosϕ∗150
= 151.319KV
∴ Nearest Standard Voltage (V2) = 132 kV
SIL = 121 MW
Line Length Mflimit
For Nc =2, (km)
Characteristic Impedance (Zc) = 200 Ω 80 2.75
160 2.25
SIL2 = = 87.12 MW 240 1.75
320 1.35
480 1.0
Calculation of Multiplying factor (Mf): 640 0.75
For Nc=1,
Mf1
For Nc=2,
Mf2
From Table, for 100 Km line length, Mflimit of the line lies between 2.25 and 2.75. Therefore, using
interpolation to find Mflimit for 100km
|
Decision:
Here, mf1 < mf limit and mf2 < mf limit. Thus, both Nc=1 and Nc=2 satisfy the stability criteria
for their corresponding economic voltage level.
Now,
Voltage Level for given Power Transmission =132 kV Number of Circuits (Nc)
=2 Power factor ( cosφ ) = 0.96
3. Tower Design
√ ()(
2
(L+ a)
)
2 2
X L+a
Vertical distance between two adjacent line conductor (y) = 1− ∗
Y CL
= √3 ∗124.98 – 88.3742
= 128.09751 inches
220 kV 1 1
2 2
≥ 400 kV 2 2
*(1/2) 2
From above table, for double circuit of 132 kV, number of circuits = 2, number of
earth wire = 2.
For all the calculations of number of insulator discs, we considered following value of
different Factors:
FS = Factor of Safety=1.2
= 265 kV
∴ Equivalent FOV = 435 * 1.15 * 1.1 * 1.2 = 402.27 kV
Nearest higher 1 min. dry FOV voltage (in table A-3) = 435 kV
From table A-3, for 1 minute dry FOV = 435 kV, no. of discs = 7
= 230 kV
From table A-3, for 1 minute dry FOV = 370 kV, no. of discs =9
= 249.3695 kV
Wet season is the worst condition.
Thus, nearest higher FOV (from table A-3, 1 min. wet FOV) = 250 kV
√2
∴ Switching o/v = 145.2 * √3 * 2.75 = 325.578 kV
Equivalent s/w FOV = Switching o/v * SIR * FWR * NAC * FS
= 593.073 kV
The nearest higher voltage (in table A-3, impulse FOV) = 610kV
Equivalent impulse withstand o/v = 550 kV (from table A-2) for 145.2 kV
= 834.9 kV
Nearest higher voltage (in table A-3, impulse FOV) = 880 kV
From above table, it is seen that the minimum no. of disc required to withstand all
tests is 9.
6. Conductor Selection
I. Continuous Current Carrying Capability
P = 200 MW,
Nc = 2,
VL = 132 kV,
Cosφ = 0.96
P/ Nc (200/ 2)*1000
Line current (IL) = = = 455.611 A
3*Vll *cos 3 *132*0.96
Comparing this value of the current with the current carrying capacity from the given
standard ASCR conductor table, the conductor “LYNX” (with current carrying
Capacity 475 A) is selected.
= 0.15890 (1+0.004*45)
= 0.187502 Ώ/Km
= 18.7502 Ώ
= (455.611)2 * 18.7502
= 3.8922 MW/conductor
This efficiency is < 94%. So this conductor cannot be used. To get the higher
efficiency we proceed in the same way and calculate efficiency.
For SHEEP conductor,
From ASCR conductor table,
= 0.07771 (1+0.004*45)
= 0.0916978 Ώ/Km
= 9.16978 Ώ
= (455.611)2 * 9.16978
= 1.9035 MW/Conductor
The SHEEP conductor has 37 strands (30 Aluminum strands and 7 steel
strands).
Diameter of each strands = 3.99 mm
Diameter of conductor (D) = 27.93 mm
Radius of the conductor(R) = 13.965 mm
GMR for inductance (GMRL) = 0.768R
= 0.768 * 13.965
= 10.72512 mm
= 1.073 cm
a c’
b b’
c a’
Here,
Where,
=√𝐷𝑎𝑎 ∗ 𝐷𝑎𝑎′
Dsa
= √1.073 ∗ 1186.7212 = 35.6841 cm
=33.9041 cm
Where,
D’ab
= 621.5197 cm = D’bc
4
= 837.71412 cm
∴GMD
= 686.5811 cm
= 0.060164 H
∴ Inductance per unit length = 0.60164 mH/km
= √1.397 ∗ 1186.7212
= 40.717 cm
= √𝐷𝑏𝑏 ∗ 𝐷𝑏𝑏′
Dsb
=√1.397 ∗ 872.9853
= 34.922 cm
3
GMRC =√𝐷𝑠𝑎 ∗ 𝐷𝑠𝑏 ∗ 𝐷𝑠𝑐
=38.6856cm
= 1.9333 μF
= (9.1678 +j 18.901) Ω
= 21.0071< 64.1250 Ω
Using π-model.
VS VR
IS IR
Z
Y/2 Y/2
Fig: Nominal π- model of T.L.
= 0.9943 + j 0.16045
∴VR per phase @ full load = kV < 00 ∴|VR| per phase @ full load =
76.21 kV
Since calculated voltage regulation < 12 %, the conductor SHEEP satisfies voltage
regulation criterion.
Thus, the conductor SHEEP can be used for our design.
kV
Since Vci > Maximum system voltage, there is no corona effect on SHEEP
conductor. So, Corona Inception Voltage criterion is satisfied and all the technical
criteria is met by
SHEEP conductor.
Hence the best five conductors which satisfy all the criteria are:
A→ 𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐏
B→DEER
C→ ZEBRA
D→ ELK
E→𝐌𝐎𝐎𝐒𝐄
7. Tension Calculation for Different Conductors
FS = Factor of safety = 2
Where k Aϵ ; K Aϵ
Where k Aϵ
k
θ3 = Temperature @ easiest condition = 650C
= 1862 kg/km
= √17262 + 18262
= 25838.921 kg/km
Calculation of T1
T 7955 kg
Calculation of T2
k1 Aϵ
k2 Aϵ
Calculation of T3
k1’ Aϵ
Using Stringing
equation; T32 (T3
+ k1’) – k2’ = 0
or, T33 +k1’ T2 – k2’ = 0 or,
T33 -1871.33 T32 – 2.831*1010
=0
∴ T2 = 3815.932 kg
So far, five best conductors have been chosen. The tension due to these five different
conductors for different span length from 250m to 350m (step of 25m ) are shown in
the following tables:
8. Sag and Tower Height Calculation
Now,
Sample Calculation
= 3.533 m
Similarly, the maximum sag, h1, h2, h3 and the total height of the tower for different
span lengths for five best conductors are calculated and presented in the table below:
9. Earth Wire Selection
For design purpose, we consider 80% of the towers are of class A, 15% of the
towers are of class B and 5% of the towers are of class C.
The bending moment acting on the tower are due to the followings:
Sample Calculation
For SHEEP and span length = 250m
= Fwp * (h1+h2+h3)*Nc
Where,
Where,
= Fwe * ht * Ne
= wp*de*lsp*2/3*ht*Ne
Where,
Assumptions:
Cost of steel = Rs 1, 50,000 per tonnes
=Rs. 841101
= 841101*401/100
= Rs. 3372815.01/km
Similarly we can find tower cost/km for 5 different conductors for their different span
length. The tower cost per unit length is shown in the following table:
Hence, the tower cost per unit length is minimum for SHEEP conductor with span
length 275 m.
12. Most Economical Span and Conductor Selection
Assumptions
Cost of Al/tonnes = Rs
20105 /- Cost of Steel/
tonnes = Rs 150000/-
Load Factor (LF) = 0.5
Capital cost per km = Tower cost per km (from table 4) + power conductor
cost per km
Total annual cost per km = Annual energy loss cost + Annual capital cost
Sample Calculation:
= 6* (20105*1036+150000*690)*10-3
= 745972.68
Tower cost per km = Rs. 3343801.241 (for span length of 275m from table 4.1)
∴ Capital cost per km = Tower cost per km + Power conductor cost per km
= Rs (3343801.241+ 745972.68)
= Rs 4089773.921
= 0.110168 * 4089773.921
= Rs 450562.2133per km
= 114.2085 * 0.3*(365*24)*7.50
= Rs. 2251049.535/-
Total annual cost per km = Annual cost of energy loss per km + Annual capital cost
= Rs 2251049.535+ Rs 450562.2133
= Rs 2701611.748/-
Similarly,
We can calculate the Total annual cost per km for each conductor with their
respective economic span length. The tabulated form of the calculation is shown
below:
Hence,
From above table, it can be seen that MOOSE is the most economical
conductor with span length of 275m.
A. Electrical Characteristics
The MOOSE conductor has 61 strands with 7 Steel strands and 54 Aluminum strands.
Diameter of each strands = 3.53mm
Diameter of conductor (d) = 31.77 mm = 3.177 cm
Radius of conductor = 15.885 mm = 1.588 cm
GMR for inductance (GMRL) = 33.9041 cm
GMR for capacitance (GMRc) = 38.6856 cm
GMD for Double circuit = 686.5811 cm
Resistance of the whole length(R) = 9.16978 Ω@ 650C
Inductance of Whole length (L) = 0.060164 H
Capacitance of whole Length(C) = 1.9333μF
B. Mechanical characteristics:
Length of span =275 m
Tension at toughest condition = T1 = 8125 kg
Tower Heights:
H1 = 11.45084 m
H2 = 13.46051 m
H3 = 15.47018 m
Ht = 20.9685 m
Bending Moment on Power Conductor due to wind force (BMPw) = 47040.4545 kgm