Notes Week 1-Week 3
Notes Week 1-Week 3
Interpreting Discourse
“My borns was in Spain but I was happy very there. My livings in now in
the Germany, also I happy very. I like to live in America one day but is
very expensive. Maybe save and move then.”
Cohesion
Cohesion is the link that exists between elements of text; the internal
connections between elements within the text. Cohesion is seen through
cohesive ties, and some of the most easy-to-identify cohesive ties are
pronouns.
“Where is Sara?”
Social Factors
Turn-Taking:
There are many techniques for taking turns in conversations ranging from
the exceedingly rude to the very polite.
For example, cutting someone off would be labelled as rude, while not
indicating your willingness to take the floor could be called shyness.
One of the most common tactics in turn-taking is called holding the floor.
This is when the speaker is very long-winded, declines to pass the floor to
someone else and avoids the use of completion points.
Paul Grice was a philosopher who identified the individual rules we follow in
order to be cooperative speakers. These are known as Grice’s Maxims which
combine to form the cooperative principle.
Grice's Maxims
Hedges:
These are words or phrases used to indicate that the speaker is not
entirely sure of the veracity of their statements.
Your parents ask if you completed the chores set out for you and you,
desperately wanting to go out, reply with “Yeah, mostly.” This is a hedge.
Implicatures:
There are multiple schemata (schemas) in every person’s mind. If you hear
about something happening in an aquarium, you do not need to have aquarium
explained to you as you know what it is; you access your aquarium schema and
use that to understand the story you are hearing.
Activity 1:
Review the following video and find why the conversations are not following
any of the above principles:
Communicate with your peers and lecturer on what you think the answer
may be.
Week 3:
Chapter 13: First Language Acquisition
&
Chapter 14: Second Language Acquisition/Learning
All humans, regardless of the language they speak and the culture they
are from, learn language in a very similar way.
We all meet the same milestones at roughly the same time and age.
This is because all these processes are tied to the maturation of the
infant’s brain, which has a consistent timeline for most humans.
Children are processing language from inside the womb already.
From inside the womb, they start learning the cadence of the language
they are being exposed to. After birth, the child continues with listening
and analysing the sounds.
This listening and evaluating never stops but it is accompanied by the
production of speech sounds from as early as a few weeks.
This process is not a conscious process in that the parents sit the child
down and explicitly teach the child the language; instead, the child listens
to and produces language and is corrected as needed.
Therefore, acquiring language is more of a trial-and-error exercise where
you learn from experience.
It is important to note that the child is not only learning from copying
adults; they create their own forms and constructions which they then
test out.
This can be seen when trying to correct a child’s speech: they usually do
not respond to the corrections and continue using the incorrect form until
they choose to start using the correct form.
So, while parents may try to get their child to talk how the parents think
they should, the most important thing for the child’s language acquisition
is interacting with them using language.
The first stage is from birth until six months and is called cooing.
It is when a child starts producing basic vowel sounds such as [i] or [u].
By four months, the child is bringing the back of the tongue into contact
with the velum (soft palate right at the back of the mouth), producing
sounds like [k] and [g].
During this time, studies have shown that children can tell the difference
between some basic vowels, as well as the velar consonants mentioned
above.
The second stage is from six to 12 months and involves the combination
of the sounds above.
This stage is known as ‘babbling’ and is characterised by phrases such as
ga-ga-ga or ba-ba-ba or ma-ma-ma.
As the child ages through this phase, the babbling becomes more
complex, with a combination of sounds such as ba-ga-ma-da and the
intonation patterns start closely resembling the intonation patterns of
the language being learnt.
This is a type of language called ‘pre-language’ and is often used by
parents to start teaching their children about conversations; the parents
treat the child’s babbling as a contribution in the conversation and
respond to the child as if they are part of the conversation.
For example, at this stage, most children will produce forms like dog,
cat and cup. However, they will also produce forms like Wassat? which
means “What’s that?” Because the child is producing two words as one
form, it is technically incorrect to call this a ‘one-word’ stage.
For example, daddy sleep can either be a question (“Is daddy sleeping?”), a
statement (“Daddy is sleeping”) or a response to the question “Where is
daddy?” (“He is sleeping”). This is the stage in which a child learns how
conversations work.
Grammatical competence: Knowing the rules and structures that govern the
language
As the years have progressed, research has focused more on the learner
than the process.
One of the best examples of this is the acceptance of ‘mistakes’ in
second-language learning.
Usually, when the process is emphasised, the learner is expected to make
no mistakes after memorising the structure, words and grammar rules of
the language.
Recently, however, these mistakes are not considered to be problematic
but, rather, expected outcomes.
These ‘mistakes’ provide an understanding of the active learning process.
Possible Errors
Once the learner becomes more comfortable with the language, they will
engage in negotiated input. This is when the learner will ask for
clarification and pay active attention when conversing with native or
fluent speakers of the language.