Steinitz Et Al (1974) Hand-Drawn Overlays Their History and Prospective Use
Steinitz Et Al (1974) Hand-Drawn Overlays Their History and Prospective Use
Steinitz Et Al (1974) Hand-Drawn Overlays Their History and Prospective Use
PAGE
Ihejown That Said No: How the Corps of Engineers_Was------------- Robert Royston 438
jgf, Editor
Gatewood. Advertising and Business Manager
Pickering. Managing Editor „90 E..L ‘'XX
Witr^' Editorial Associate
'^rn Morgan, Book Review Editor
Ela? Steve Hall, Graphic Consultants
Schweitzer, Circulation Manager
Gibson. Assistant Circulation Manager
Hand-Drawn Overlays:
Their History and Prospective Uses
by Carl Steinitz, Paul Parker, and Lawrie Jordan
444
Although no direct men- region. Rather, the em-
tion is made of actually phasis appears to be on cir-
employing an overlay tech- culation. The natural land-
nique, the LANDSCAPE scape is, however, de-
ARCHITECTURE article scribed topographically
does discuss soil and vege- and only sites of higher
tation information (Figs. elevation are recommended
1.1 and 1.2) together with for future residential de-
topography, and their com- velopment, while the low-
bined relationship to land lands are set aside for agri-
use. There is little doubt culture and industry.
that Manning combined A series of regional data
and analyzed the various maps at the same scale
Billerica data elements were prepared, followed by
through an overlay process a general land use and cir-
and presented the project culation recommendation
to the town in exactly the map. The maps include a
same manner that many spatial accessibility plan
practicing professionals showing proximity to exist-
would today. ing roads (Fig. 1.3), while
future accessibility is ex-
Dusseldorf, 1912, time- amined as the proximity to
series change overlays. two alternative additional
In the same year, results ring roads (Fig. 1.4). The
of a design competition use of overlays as a tech-
for the city plan for Dussel- nique is again not specifi-
dorf were published in cally mentioned. It does,
Bonder-Katalog Fur die however, seem reasonable
Gruppe Stadtebau der to assume that the several
Stadteausstellung zu Dus- data maps, prepared at the
seldorf 1912. Included were same scale and including
five plans depicting Dussel- accessibility interpreta-
dorf's development from tions, were combined and
1874 to 1912. All were analyzed through overlay
drawn to the same scale. procedures.
By overlapping them one
could easily trace the city's New York, 1923, economic
growth and see which areas and demographic overlays,
were responding more varied base scales.
readily to development In 1929, The Survey of
pressures. Again, no expli- New Tork and Its Environs
cit mention is made regard- was published. The data
ing the use of overlays and gathered and presented for
we can only infer their use the regional survey of New
in the analysis of historic York consisted of many
growth, volumes and represents a
wealth of facts and infor-
Abercrombie and Johnson, mation. Most of its maps
1922, accessibility isolines. and tables were prepared
Ten years later, a re- between 1923 and 1925,
gional planning scheme for and refer to that period.
Fig. 14
Doncaster, England, was In Vol. II, Population,
Pioneering example of data overlays was 1912 analysis prepared and published by Land Values and Govern-
of Billerica, Mass., by Warren Manning [Figs. 1.1 and Patrick Abercrombie and ment, we have an indica-
1.2]. In early 1930s Abercrombie and Johnson produced Thomas Johnson in The tion that overlays were
spatial accessibility maps for Doncaster region [figs. 1.3 Doncaster Regional Plan- part of the analysis pro-
and 1.4], implying the overlay process. ning Scheme. While this cedure.
was an early effort in re- New York was analyzed
gional planning, it typified over time in relation to
many regional studies of population densities in a
the 1920s, Relatively little manner similar to that of
attention was given to the the Dusseldorf study. Two
natural elements of the series of maps display pop-
446
cious blending of the first Philip Lewis as principal
HO CMARACttflISTia
four maps." How better consultant, uses overlays
could a contemporary pro- to evaluate natural re-
fessional explain this pro- sources for the entire state
cess? of Wisconsin. Individual
landscape elements of
Whittle, 1950, limitations water, wetlands, vegeta-
and data handling stra- tion, and significant topo-
tegies. graphy, are combined
In Appendix I of the through overlays into a
same book Jack Whittle composite map (Fig. 1.11)
wrote an article, "The Pre- depicting Wisconsin's "en-
paration of Planning Maps: vironmental corridors" —
Sources, Notations and areas of prime environ-
Methods of Reproduction." mental importance. In-
He begins by describing cluded in the study is a
the limitations of maps, graphic interpretation of
and discusses the difficul- the more detailed analysis
ties of illustrating the dyna- (Fig. 1.12), obviously gen-
Fig 1.10 TyrwnHI-s Land Characteristics eralized for purposes of
mic qualities of an area;
"A pictorial technique of public communication.
two dimensions cannot
deal adequately with pre- Alexander and Mannheim,
sentation problems of such 1962, many factors, hier-
complexity, but there are archical combinations,
two methods in use which, weightings.
although they do not solve Another study completed
the problem, avoid it. The in 1962 applies overlay
first, and more common techniques in a more com-
method, is to use several plex manner. The study
base maps of the area, and was done by Christopher
show a deliberate restricted Alexander and Marvin
amount of information on Mannheim at the Civil En-
each map, e.g., land use gineering Systems Labor-
on one map, traffic flow atory, Massachusetts In-
on another, etc. The second stitute of Technology, and
method uses one base map is entitled. The Use of Dia-
PiJ SUWACI «KTI«
on which the basic matter grams in Highway Route
of the survey (often land Location: An Experiment
jXl lOUiT. WCXJOtA*® * MiTUtf use) is drawn, and places Twenty-six different dia-
K] UUAMIATIOK over this a series of trans- grams, each depicting the
WtTLAND
g n ieic an t t o e >o g r aph t s u r f ac e WATER, parencies, each 'overlay' relatively "utility" or desir-
ig. 1.11 Philip Lewis' composite Map showing one subject." It is ability of the highway
clear from the literature location for one specific
that by 1950 transparent requirement of the high-
overlays were being used way, are considered for
by planners and designers analysis. The study recog-
both as a standard land nizes that not all factors
analysis technique and as a can be geographically over-
presentation method. laid at one time, and pro-
poses a formal procedure
Lewis, 1962, very large "tree" for the combination
area, generalized. and weighting of overlays.
In more recent times (Fig. 1.13).
there are many examples This study surpasses tra-
displaying overlay analysis ditional overlay applica-
techniques including appli- tions in several ways; in its
cations to very large geo- use of an explicit weighing
graphical areas. Recreation system for the combination
in Wisconsin, published in of different components, in
1963 by the Department of the idea of superimposing
Resource Development, the different diagrams or
... ■■environmental Corridors" State of Wisconsin, with maps photographically as
1.12 Lewis tnvinv
448
Hand-drawn data map Another possible expla- withstood the test of time color code does not com-
process requires multiple nation for the increased and diverse application. municate this well.
re coding and re drawing use of overlay techniques Possibly, however, it is in-
of maps such as these, a is related to the type and adequate, inflexible, and The hand-drawn data
serious liability when more scale of projects for which inefficient — particularly map process
is required for design they were used and to their given the revolution in In the typical "hand-
decisions. presentation. As designers contemporary graphic tech- drawn data map process"
began working on larger nologies and the ever-in- shown in Fig. 2.1., we usu-
and more complex prob- creasing complexity of our ally make a data map as
lems, they could not as- project needs. follows: first, we get the
semble, analyze or explain Is it reasonable to expect data source (usually an-
the necessary data on a that we will continue to other map), then we define
Hand-Drawn single base map. For pur- rely on manual graphic and make outlines of
Data Map Process poses of clearer graphic methods in the next half- homogeneous zones and
presentation as well as ana- century? And don't changes select a color code. Then,
lysis, the data had to be in graphic technology and we "color it in" just as
mapped as separately com- project needs imply changes children do. Finally, on
binable components. Over- in the organization of over- the light table, we pray that
lays may have been a na- lay processes? We believe we can make sense of it in
tural result of this graphic that the answer is "yes!" combination with a limited
dilemma. number of other data
These overlay methods II. The Hand-Drawn Data maps. I have continually
of analysis have aided the File Process observed this approach at
design professions for well An Alternative several professional offices
over half a century and While working with Bill and schools, including my
continue as a fundamental Johnson of Johnson, John- own. The data map pro-
concept. Their greatest role son, and Roy about three duct, while fine for display
has been to help us realize years ago, the question was purposes, is usually not
that a better understanding raised, "What are the tech- fine for analysis purposes
of the whole is derived nical limits of hand-drawn without recoding and re-
from a knowledge of the overlay analysis tech- drawing. This graphic in-
parts and how they relate niques?" The project was efficiency and inflexibility
to each other. The applica- the evaluation of the na- is a serious liability, par-
tions have become more tural environment of the ticularly as projects get
complex, diverse and tech- Upper Michigan Peninsula. larger and more complex,
nically sophisticated, but A prototype study area had or have more basic options
as we examine the use of to be done on short time to consider.
the overlay approaches and budget. All requisite
from their early develop- base data had been col- The computer data
ment to present applica- lected. The organization of file process
tions, it is clear that the a computer data base was A computer data file
basic methodology and the not feasible. The issue was process approaches the
underlying logic have how to set up a hand- problem differently. One
changed little. We combine drawn graphic analysis sys- still has to get the data
data maps of soil, slope, tem which could flexibly source map (or other data
and other elements in the and appropriately use the source which is already in
same manner that Warren available data to perform a computer-compatible form)
Manning probably did in large number of analyses and one still has to define
1912. We commonly hand- without the expense of re- or locate the various homo-
draw each data element as drawing 200 potential eva- geneous zones. At that
a complete separate map luations. Clearly, the data point the traditional hand-
and then combine maps maps, once drawn and drawn and computer ap-
through overlays — visual- colored, could not be used proaches diverge. Regard-
ly, by redrawing or by as overlays because the less of whether the com-
photographic reproduction graphic codes would have puter encoding process is
_ into some sort of com- to be changed (and the based on a grid or on ir-
posite representing the maps redrawn) each time regular polygons, the com-
analysis. the subvariables were to be puter data file process en-
This apparent stability of used differently in an ana- codes and provides separ-
approach may be a good lysis. For some things, steep able access to each sub-
thing, attesting to an ef- slopes are good, and for variable. Thus, in effect,
ficient, accurate, profes- some things steep slopes one makes not one data
sional process which has are bad; and one slope map map, but a separable, map-
450
FIGURE 2.3
The Hand-Drawn
Data Map Process
hand work is the same. In matrix, and overlaying locate on a site; and eval-
the traditional approach, them on a line drawing-on- uations of the vulnerability
the product is one colored plastic base map. One can of the site to the impacts
data map, and all sub- then photograph or inex- caused by construction
sequent analysis maps must pensively duplicate the dis- maintenance and any acti-
be redrawn. In the com- play of each combination vitiesS associated with
puter-like approach, the with no added coloring physical change. Both in-
product is as many maps time. When done, the data volve the definition of cri-
as there are subvariables, file element maps are re- teria and result in mapped
but the data work is the turned to the file for the analyses. Both must be
same. Subsequent analyses next use, as in a computer combined in a proposal/
■6a] Composite: I-latter = Darker
do not require redrawing. data file. synthesis.
The data file elements Working backwards
were then used for both the A design analysis approach from what appears to be a
diverse analyses and data using the hand-drawn data traditional practice, we first
display. In the JJR study,3 file process define the problem: the
a matrix was first prepared In our own use of the aims, the site and the pro-
to show which criteria hand-drawn data file pro- gram of physical changes
(data file maps) were to be cedure^ in projects of to be considered for the
used for each analysis. Any greatly varying scales, we site area. We then identify
overlay analysis consisted find it useful to distinguish the analyses by which we
simply of getting the ap- between separate analyses will prepare and evaluate
propriate subvariables from of the attractiveness for our proposed designs. Both
[60] Composite Steeper = Darker the file according to the activities which seek to attractiveness and vulnera-
452
Among the simpler syn- infrastructure alternative,
thesis steps derived from for example, the changes
Fig. 2.5 and shown in Fig. in attractiveness for com-
2.6 are the following: one merce and housing caused
can identify parts of the by the addition of a major
site that are generally at- new road. Our design work
tractive by overlaying all using computers has clear-
or some of the attractive- ly shown the efficacy of
ness analyses. These can iterative synthesis methods,
also be weighted as be- with rapid evaluation being
fore, by duplicating the the key to trial-and-error
summary analyses. design. This style of probe-
One can identify areas of and-test is difficult to do
multiple-vulnerability by with the traditional data
overlaying all or some of map process, since all ana-
the vulnerability analyses. lyses typically have to be
Again, component analyses redrawn for each alterna-
of these danger zones can tive. In the data file pro-
be weighted graphically. cess, however, only the
One can also compare data element of road ac-
sites that are attractive cess needs to be altered.
with their potential im- All the rest of the data can
pacts; by overlaying the remain unchanged. The
green attractiveness ana- analysis process then simply
lyses on each of the red gets repeated (by using the
vulnerability summaries. duplicating technology)
Thus, “greener" = more and the results can be visu-
attractive and less vulner- ally compared.
able; while "redder” = less Suppose you have some
attractive and more vul- doubts about choosing and
nerable. Ultimately, the de- weighting the criteria them-
sign involves explicit deci- selves. It can hardly be
sions that combine "attrac- easier to discuss several
tiveness" and "vulnera- alternatives and their spa-
bility" in specific (and by tial and qualitative con-
this approach, not neces- sequences. Just "pull" the
sarily quantifiable) judg- appropriate trial "sand-
ments. As a general and wiches" on a light table.
simple rule, however, one There's no drawing to be
tries to keep to the done.
"greener" areas ("go")
rather than the "redder" Some additional advantages
("stop!"). Suppose that the project
Suppose that spatial lo- is to result in a publica-
cation criteria are involved tion, in color. I have often
— for example, to find seen projects in which all
locations a given distance the working maps had to
from a highway, or down- be completely redrawn just
Forest I ;y| 'Mt-4CKJ m wind from a point pollu- for publication purposes.
tion source. If you can Note that the data file ele-
identify proximities as ini- ment maps are just like
tial data needs, you can photo-offset plates. Thus,
treat proximity as a data with the added work of
element, and draw an ap- contacting a good printing
propriate set of maps as shop, they can be trans-
was done for highway ac- formed directly into display
cess in Fig. 2.5. These can data maps for publication,
then be used in the hand in any color, without re-
overlay process just like drawing. Some of the fig-
any other data. ures in this article are an
Open and Agriculture [20] 401 + <n.
Suppose that in develop- example. For several years
ing the design you wish to we have been using com-
"test" the effects of a major puter graphics as the
454
Abercrombie, Patrick, and Regional Plan of New York and
T.H. Johnson, The Doncaster Its Environs, Vol. 1, prepared
Regional Planning Scheme, The by the staff of the Regional
University Press of Liverpool Plan, New York, 1929.
Ltd., Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., Tyrwhitt, Jacqueline, "Sur-
London, 1922. veys for Planning," Town and
Adams, Thomas, H. Lewis Country Planning Textbook,
and M. Crosley, Population, Edited by APRR, The Archi-
Land Values and Government, tectural Press, London, 1950,
Regional Survey of New Tork pp. 146-196.
and Its Environs, Vol. 11, New Wallace, McHarg, Roberts
York, 1929. and Todd, A Comprehensive
Alexander, Christopher and Highway Route Selection
Marvin L. Manheim, The Use Method, prepared for the Dela-
of Diagrams in Highway Route ware-Raritan Committee on 1-
Location: An Experiment, Pub- 95, 1966.
lication No. 161, Department of Whittle, Jack, The Prepara-
Civil Engineering, Civil Engin- tion of Planning Maps," Town
eering Systems Laboratory, and Country Planning Text-
Massachusetts Institute of Tech- book, edited by APRR, The
nology, Cambridge, Massa- Architectural Press, London,
chusetts, March, 1962. 1950, pp. 540-559.
Forshaw, J.H. and Abercrom-
bie, Patrick, County of London
Plan, MacMillan and Company
Ltd., London, 1943.
Manning, Warren, "The Bil-
lerica Town Plan,” Landscape
Architecture, Vol. HI, No. 3,
April 1913, pp. 108-118.
McHarg, Ian, Design with
Nature, The Natural History
Press, Garden City, New York,
1969.
Recreation in Wisconsin, State
of Wisconsin, Department of
Resource Development, David
Carley, Director, Philip H.
Lewis, Jr., Consultant, Madi-
son, Wisconsin, 1962.
Sender-Katalog Fur die
Cruppe Stadtebau der Stadle-
ausstellung zu Dusseldorf, 1912,
Druck von A. Bagel, Dussel-
dorf, 1912. FIGURE 2.6
The Graphic Regional Plan, Commercial/Erosion