Coresguppy 1921
Coresguppy 1921
Coresguppy 1921
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.T.ODtrC.0. ................................................................... 5%
Materials and methods ........................................................... 555
Experimental results ............................................................. 555
Crosses between brown and red ................................................ 557
Crosses between brown and variegated red ...................................... 557
Crosses between variegated red and red ............................... 557
Crosses between white females and red males. ................................... 558
Crosses between white females and variegated red males .......................... 559
Crosses between white females and brown males ................................. 559
Crosses between blue and red ................................................. 561
Mating white with white ...................................................... 561
Crosses between blue females and white mafes ............................. 561
Crosses between blue and blue ............... ............................. 562
Crosses between brown and blue ............................................... 562
Crosses between brown and white .... ..................... 562
Crosses between red and white ................................................. 563
variegated red females and white males .......................... 564
............................................................. 564
Color-producing genes. ....................................................... 564
Triple allelomorphs........................................................... 565
Sex-linked inheritance ........................................................ 565
Location of the dominant gene, R,in the Y chromosome.......................... 569
Crossing over between the sex chromosomes ..................................... 570
SUMMARY ....................................................................... 572
CITED ..............................................................
LITERATURE 572
.................................................................... 573
POSTSCRIPT
INTRODUCTION
The brown-black variety was obtained wild from nature, while all others
were bought from a fancier. Among them, I was able to distinguish four
varieties, viz., orange-red; white, orange-red variegated with black, and
white variegated with black (plate 1, figures 1, 3, 5, 2).
I n nature this fish seems to live two years. The young, hatched out
in summer, spawn at the same season of the next year and soon die, so
that in autumn all fishes in nature are young and small. I n culture their
life may be prolonged one year more.
When the fishes are well nourished, they spawn every day early in the
morning, from the beginning of May to the end of August. According to
my observations, the number of eggs deposited daily averages 25; the
maximum was 71. The female carries the spawned egg-mass about half a
day, when not disturbed.
For the purpose of rearing the young, I stripped off the egg mass from
the female with the fingers, and then put the egg masses in a porcelain
vessel about one foot in diameter, one vessel containing not more than
five egg masses. The young hatch in about one week after spawning in
the hottest part of our summer.
As food for young just hatched, either powder of heated wheat grains
or any dried flesh is good, while fish which are somewhat grown, if nour-
ished with small earthworms (Tubificide), grow quite rapidly. The body
of a full-grown fish measures on the average 30 mm in length, without
the tail-fin. An aquarium of four square feet in surface area and measur-
ing one foot and a half in depth may contain 200 adult fishes in a healthy
condition, if proper care is taken to change the water.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
For the sake of brevity, varieties which are more accurately described
as brown-black, blue-black, orange-red, orange-red variegated with black,
and white variegated with black, t d l hereafter be designated simply as
brown, blue, red, red variegated, and white variegated, respectively. The
number within parentheses denotes the year when the mating was made.
GENETICS6 : N 1921
I PLATE
E ~ ~ A T OF O ~
Originally drawn to twice natural size, but reduced to one and three-fourths times natural
size in reproduction.
Figure 1.-Orange-red.
Figure 2.--White variegated with black.
Figure S.-White.
Figure 4.-Brown-black, wild form.
Figure 5.4range-red variegated with black
Figure 6.-BIue-black.
7
"g.1 nq. 2 Ry.3
R9.4
T
Rg. 5
T
(:ENETICS 6: N 1921
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE IN A FRESH-WATER FISH 557
Experiment 2
Back-cross of experiment 1. Heterozygous brown females were mated
to pure red males (1914). The result was
Bvovm Red
Observed.. ............................................. 937 924
Expectation. ............................................. 930.5 930.5
Experiment 4
Back-cross of experiment 3. Heterozygous brown males were bred to
homozygous variegated red females (1916). The result was
Brown Variegated red
Observed. .............................................. 148 148
Expectation. ............................................. 148 148
Experiment 6
Back-cross of experiment 5. Heterozygous variegated red males were
bred to homozygous red females (1916). The result was
Variegated red Red
Observed ............................................... 216 200
Expectation. ............................................. 208 208
Experiment 8
Back-cross of the above experiment. Heterozygous red males were
bred to white females (1915). The result was
Red White
Observed.. ................................... 519 502
Expectation. .................................. 510.5 510.5
Observed ..................................
-
0
2
Red
d
251
c_h_
0
197
While
d
1
Expectation. ............................... 0 253 198 0
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE I N A FRESH-WATER FISH 559
Observed.. ........ 46
-
0
Variegated red
r
90
d P
59
-
Variegated white
8
0
.
17
Red
-__.
3
37
3
-
P
17
White
d
0
Expectation. ....... 45.3 90.6 59 0 18 36 17 0
Experiment 11 A
Back-cross of experiment 10 A. Heterozygous brown males were mated
to white females (1916). The offspring were
Brown Blue Red White
Observed ........................ 387 317 253 246
Expectation ...................... 300.75 300.75 300.75 300.75
Observed ..........
- 0
O
Brown
d
176
__?
0
214
Blue
8
1
__?
0
0
Red
8
135
__?
P
146
White
d
0
Expectation ........ 0 176 215 0 0 135 146 0
GENETICS 6 : N 1921
560 TATUO AIDA
In the last two experiments the deviation of the actual numbers from
expectation is rather large, so that I have repeated both experiments.
I n order to reduce as much as possible the influence of differential mor-
tality among the young of various colors, records were taken a t as early a
stage as was possible. First, at a very young stage, i.e., two or three days
after hatching, black and colorless young were distinguishable from each
other and were separated. Secondly, when the young fish had grown to
about 1 cm in length and the development of xanthophore had become
conspicuous, those previously classed as “ black’’ were distinguishable either
as brown or as blue and were separated accordingly, while those previously
classed as “colorless’’ were distinguishable as red or as white, and were so
classified.
Experiment 10 B
Repetition (1917-1918) of experiment 10 A. The first inspection of the
F2 generation gave
Black Colorless
O b s e ~ e ...............................................
d 2016 667
Expectation. ............................................. 2012.25 670.75
P
Brown
8
. -0 -Blue-8 0
Red
8 0
White
c?
Observed ............ 71 164 59 0 48 131 62 0
Expectation .......... 78.3 156.6 59 0 59.7 119.4 62 0
Experiment 11 B
Repetition (1918) of experiment 11 A. The first inspection gave
Black Colorless
Observed.. ............................................. 823 776
Expectation.. ............................................ 799.5 799.5
Observed.. .......
-
The result of sex examination was
0
2
Brown
120
8
ch?
Q
114
Blue
0
d
- -
0
0
Red
8
71
Q
62
White
d
0
Exfiectation ........ 0 122 114 0 0 71 62 0
Observed. ..............................
_h_?
0
62
Brown
41
d
-
0
69
Red
48
d
GENETICS6 : N 1921
562 TATUO AIDA
Observed.. ...........................................
_h_
0
33
Blue
48
8
-
Q
51
Wkik
49
d
--
The result of sex examination was
B70W Blue Red Wkik
_rr__ cIc--r
0 c
9 Q d Q d O d
Observed.. ......... 173 88 0 79 78 34 0 31
Expectation .......... 174 87 0 79 74.6 37.3 0 31
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE I N A FRESH-WATER FISH 563
Experiment 18
Heterozygous brown males which were the F1 offspring derived from
experiment 17, were bred to white females (1918). The offspring were
a t an early stage
Black Colorless
Observed.. .............................................. 917 988
Expectation.. ............................................. 952.5 952.5
148
8 0
165
Red
c?
0
_h_
0
0
White
8
126
Expectation.. ........... 157 0 0 148 165 0 0 126
Experiment 20
Heterozygous red males produced as F, ofispring in experiment 19 were
bred to white females (1918). The offspring were
Red White
Observed.. ................................................ 330 324
Expectation. ................................................ 327 327
Observed.. ......................................
-
9
135
Red
3
0
-
9
0
White
6 ”
153
Expectation.. ..................................... 135 0 0 153
GENETICS6 : N 1921
564 TATUO AIDA
Observed.. ...........
Variegakd red
c _ _
0
76
8
35
-- -
Variegated while
0
0
8
34
0
27
Red
3
5
0
0
White
3
6
...........
Expectation. 74 37 0 34 21.4 10.7 0 6
DISCUSSION
Color-producing genes
White is recessive to any other color and breeds true (experiment 13).
Red and-white, when crossed, segregate out, each to its respective original
color in the Fz generation, according to the simplest Mendelian ratio (ex-
periments 7, 8, 19, 20), from which we see that red color is produced by a
single dominant gene which I will call R. The cross between brown and
red gives also in Fz the original colors according to the 3 :1 ratio (experiment
1)) from which we see clearly that brown color has one more gene, B, in
addition to the red-producing R. That the genetical constitution of brown
should be BR is confirmed by the cross of brown with white, because in the
Fz generation four varieties, brown, blue, red, and white, are produced
according to the dihybrid ratio, 9 :3 :3 :1 (experiments 10, 17). The same
fact is more directly proven by the result of experiment 12 where the cross
blue X red gave rise to brown offspring. Blue individuals, which originated
in my cultures, possess the gene B, which is also contained in brown ones,
as shown by the results of experiments 14, 15 and 16. TOYAMA (1916)
and ISHIWARA (1917) have reported results exactly similar to mine derived
from crosses between brown, red, and white.
Variegation is produced by another gene, B'; this is clearly proven by
the cross between variegated red and red (experiments 5, 6), where we see
the monohybrid segregation, as well as by the cross between variegated red
and white (experiments 9, 21) where we see the dihybrid segregation con-
cerning the genes B' and R.
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE I N A FRESH-WATER FISH 565
GENETICS6 : N 1921
566 TATUO AIDA
ila type, XX-XY, i.e., to that type in which the female is homozygous
and the male heterozygous for the sex (or X) chromosome. HUXLEY
(1920, page 270) recently assumed the same type of sex inheritance to
occur in the fish, Giardinus. Second, the red-producing gene R is located
in the chromosomes X and Y .
The male homozygous for red color has one R gene contained in t h e X
and another contained in the Y chromosome, which I represent by R,
and R,, respectively; while the female homozygous for red color has one
R gene contained in each of the two X chromosomes which I represent
by Rx.
As a critical test for the above view the results of experiment 8 may be
cited. I n this experiment the male FI offspring derived from the cross
white female X homozygous red male were mated to white females. Had
the sex been inherited according to the Abraxas type, in which the female
is heterozygous and the male homozygous in respect to the sex-determin-
ing genes, we should expect to have as the result of the experiment, red
females and males, and white females and males in equal numbers. The
actual result was quite different; all whites, 197 in number, were female
except only one individual, while all reds, except 2 out of 253, were male.
When we assume the Drosophila type in our case, these results are in per-
fect agreement with the theoretical expectation, as we shall see in the follow-
ing diagram.
rxrx (white 0 ) X RxR, (red$)
I
I I
Rxrx (red 0 ) rxRy ( r e d g ) X rXrx (white 0 )
I
I I
rxr, (white 0 ) rxRy (redd')
(all white) (all red)
As above stated, the mode of sex inheritance in our fish belongs to the
Drosophila type. The Y chromosome in our case differs however from
what we see in Drosophila, inasmuch as it contains the dominant gene R.
The production of red (dominant) males from the cross between white
(recessive) female and red (dominant) male, as seen in the above diagram,
would be otherwise quite unexplainable.
All other experimental results concerning sex linkage are equally well
explainable according to the above hypothesis. Below I will give in the
form of diagrams the theoretical expectation and the results actually ob-
tained in experiments 7, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21.
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE I N A FRESH-WATER FISH 567
Experiment 7
RxRy (redd') X rxrx (white 9 1
1
I I
Rxrx (red 9 1 X rxRy (redd')
I
I I I I
Rxrx (red 9 rxr, (white 9 ) RxR, (redd') rxRy (redd')
Red Whdk
_h_ ch_
O d 0 3
Theoretical sex ratio.. .............................. 1 2 1 0
Observed.. ....................................... 41 76 43 0
Experiment 9
B'B'RxR, (variegated red 8) X bbrxr, (white 9 )
I
I I
B'bRXrx(variegated red 9 ) X B'brxRy (variegated r e d s )
I
I I
B'B'R,R,
2B'bR,rx
'I
B'B'rXRy (variegated
2B'bRxRy red C? )
2B'brxR,
B'B'R,rx (variegated
]
red 9 )
- -
Variegated red Variegated while
bbR,r, (red 9 ) bbrxvx (white 9 )
bbR,R, }(redc?)
bbrxRy
__L_
Red
cc_
Whik
0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
Theoretical sex ratio. ... 1
' 2 1 . 0 1 2 1 0
Observed.. ........... 46 90 59 0 17 37 17 0
Experiment 10
BBRxR, (brownd') X bbrxYx (white 9 )
1
I I
BbR,r, (brown 9 ) X BbrxRy (brownc?)
I
I I I I
BBRxRy
BBrxRy
2BbRxRy
2BbrxRy
2BbRxrx
I
(brownc? )
2 Bbr, r, 9)
BBrxYx](bhe
bbR, Y, (red 9 )
bbR,Ry
bbr,R,
bbr,r, (white 9 )
GENETICS6 : N 1921
568
--
TATUO MDA
2
d
-Q
1
White
d
0
Observed*. ............. 148 211
11.5 0 57 168 81 0
*Sum of the results of two experiments, 10 A and 10 B.
Experiment 11
B6QY (bromc?) X bbr,r, (u.hiteO)
f
I I I 1
Bbr,R, (brown$) Bbrxrx (blueP) bbrXRs (red$) bbr,r, (white 1
Brown Bise Red White
Theoretical sex mtio.
ments, 21 A and 11 B)
. ..
Observed (the sum of the
results of two experi-
I
2
all 3
286 328
7d Q
all 0
1.
-
0
all 3
206
d Q
208
all 0
0
d *
Experiment 17
BBRx& (6rown9f X 6&rXry
( w ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
I
i I
BbRxr, (brown9) X BbRxry (brown81
I
0
O c i r
1
ch_
Q
2 1
d
0
-
O
1
d
Experiment 18
BbRxry (brown$) X bbr,~, (white9)
I
i f -i-- f
BbR,r, (brown 0 1 S&gY(blue$) bbRxrx (red 9 1 bbrxry (white#)
Observed.. ............157
- --
0
EFm
all 0
3
0 *
?
0
Bke
a w
d
148
O
165
Ked
afl0
d
0
?
0
Whike
allo*
___c_
d
126
SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE IN A FRESH-WATER FISH 569
Experiment 19
RxRx (red91 X rxry (white$)
I
I t
Rxrx (red 9 ) X Rxry (red$)
I
1 I I I
RxRx (red 0 )
.........................
Rxry (redd')
-
O
2
Red
d
1
rxry (whitecP)
p
O
0
h?
Whib
d
1
Observed.. ................................. 87 42 0 33
Experiment 20
Rxry (red$) X rxrx (whiteQ)
I
I I
R,r, (redQ) r g , (white$)
Red Wh&3
Theoretical sex ratio. ......................... all 9 all8
_I___ p__
0 d 0 . 9
Observed. .................................. 135 0 0 153
Experiment 21
B'B'RxRx (variegated red P) X bbrxry (white$)
I
i t
B'bRxrx (variegated red 0 ) X BfbRxry(Variegated red&
II
I I
(variegated bbR,R, bbrxry(whited')
white$) bbRxrx](red 0 )
2
0
Red
8
1
-
0
0
White
1
8
Observed ............... 76 35 0 34 25 5 0 6
red males bought from the fancier were homozygous for that color. That
the wild brown male contains the R gene in its Y chromosome is to be seen
clearly from the results of experiments 10 and 11. Since the Y chromosome
is inherited by the male, exclusively, and consequently goes from the father
t o his son only, all males contained in the progeny of any mating to which
either a red or a brown male is a party, possess the gene R, i.e., they are
red, red variegated, or brown; whilst all individuals lacking the gene R,
Le., white, white variegated, or blue, are female (experiments 7, 8, 9, 10
and 11).
According to the investigations hitherto reported, the Y chromosome
in the Drosophila type and also the W chromosome in the Abraxas type
(corresponding to the Y chromosome in Drosophila) are known to possess
no dominant gene, so that all characters contained therein are recessive
in genetic behavior. The fact that in our fish this chromosome carries
a dominant gene instead of a recessive is very interesting, and will bring
out a certain important significance of its existence.
20, and 21, in which the male offspring of the exceptional white male de-
rived from experiment 8 were mated to various females, would then have
to be explained by assuming the constitution of the original male to have
been r,O.
In order to settle the question, which of the two views,-crossing over
or non-disjunction,-will better explain the production of unexpected in-
dividuals, the result may be cited of a mating between heterozygous red
females and males (experiment 22, not previously described in this paper).
The red mothers in this experiment were F2 offspring from the cross
white 9 X brown 3 (experiment 10 B) and should have the constitution
R, r, , while the red fathers were F2 offspring from the cross brown 9
X white 8(experiment 17) and should have the constitution either R,r,
or R,O, according as we’adopt the view of crossing over or that of non-
disjunction. The result of the cross was
Experiment 22 (1919)
Red 9 (Rxrx) X R e d 3 (RXryor R,O)
I
i I
Red White
Observed ...................... 451 149
Expectation ................... 450 150
Observed .....................................
c____
0
146
Red
d
57
-
O
2
White
d
80
Expectation. ................................... 135.4 67.7 0 82
determine their origin have been thus far in vain, though their production
by crossing over seems to me to be highly probable. At present, my data
concerning this question are yet very scanty, and I am unable to make
any further inference in this respect, but I hope to be able to give much
more detail in a future paper, because the experiments for the purpose are
now in progress.
SUMMARY
GENETICS
6 : N 1921