2014 Gottschall Results and Conclusions of A Floating Lidar Offshore Test
2014 Gottschall Results and Conclusions of A Floating Lidar Offshore Test
2014 Gottschall Results and Conclusions of A Floating Lidar Offshore Test
com
ScienceDirect
Energy Procedia 53 (2014) 156 – 161
Abstract
In this contribution we introduce the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy, a floating-lidar
prototype comprising a proven marine buoy design and a pulsed lidar device integrated in it. A
software correction algorithm was developed to remove the effects of sea conditions resulting in
system motions from the recorded lidar data. The final performance of the system was verified in
a measurement campaign next to the offshore meteorological mast FINO1 in the German North
Sea. Both the results of an accuracy assessment and a more detailed sensitivity analysis of the
floating-lidar performance with respect to different external parameters were performed.
For the recorded horizontal mean wind speeds a very good measurement performance with an
R2-value of 0.996 is achieved even when no motion correction is applied. To use the turbulence
intensity and wind direction data from the system, the application of a motion correction is
necessary. The overall System Availability for the nine-weeks-measurement period was derived
as 98%.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS
Keywords: floating lidar; FINO1 met. mast; verification test; sensitivitiy analysis.
1876-6102 © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of SINTEF Energi AS
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.224
J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 (2014) 156 – 161 157
1. Introduction
During the last years it was shown that floating-lidar systems, defined as a LiDAR (Light Detection And
Ranging) wind measuring device integrated in or placed on top of a buoy, offer a great potential to assess offshore
wind resources. In particular, these systems are a cost-effective and comparatively flexible alternative to fixed
offshore meteorological (met.) masts. The development of suitable, i.e. for an application in the offshore wind
industry optimized, floating-lidar systems has made considerable progress within the last few years. The
realisations, developed in different R&D projects and being partly commercially offered already today, vary not
only in the adapted lidar technology and buoy concepts but also in their strategies for data handling or power supply
as well as in the consideration of motion effects on the recorded data. A comprehensive overview of different
floating-lidar systems is e.g. given in [1], selected systems are introduced in more detail in [1a-c].
In this contribution we focus on our own development, the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy that is introduced
in 2. Following the system introduction, we present the results and conclusions of the first offshore trial of the
system next to the FINO1 met. mast. The paper is concluded with a brief summary in 4.
The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy was developed within the R&D project ‘Offshore Messboje’ (funded by
the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, with a duration of two years
from 2011 to 2013). The prototype was completed in spring 2013.
The developed floating-lidar system integrates a Windcube£ v2 lidar device in an adapted marine buoy, designed
according to the navigational-light buoy LT81. The complete buoy has a height of 7.2 m, a diameter of 2.55 m and
a weight of 4.7 t. The system is characterized by its encapsulated lidar device, placed in a custom-made housing to
ensure maximum protection against the offshore environment. An autonomous power system was designed and
assembled based on three micro-wind turbines, solar panels and AGM battery banks for energy storage. The motion-
correction algorithm, with respect to that the internal (motion-) measurement system was set up, was developed by
Fraunhofer IWES in preliminary studies to the project, and has been implemented as part of the post-processing of
the floating-lidar data. The algorithm utilizes high-frequency (10 Hz) yaw and tilt data from a motion-measurement
system that runs in parallel to the lidar device. Based on these data a coordinate transformation for the reference
system of the lidar measurements is performed, and the recorded lidar data are corrected considering a fixed refernce
system – cf. the description in [2].
Figure 1 shows the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy before and during installation for its first offshore trial in
the German North Sea.
Figure 1: Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy (© Fraunhofer IWES / Photographs: Caspar Sessler)
158 J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 (2014) 156 – 161
The offshore test of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy next to the FINO1 met. mast was arranged to
validate the functionality of the system and to verify its measurement performance. In this regard, both the system
availability and the accuracy of the recorded data in comparison to the FINO1 reference data were studied.
3.2 Results
The overall measurement duration for the offshore verification test is defined by the installation and de-
installation of the floating-lidar system, which corresponds to 65 complete days or about nine weeks. According to
our pre-set lidar measurement heights (from 40 m to 260 m in steps of 20 m) and the heights of the cup
anemometers at the FINO1 met. mast, we identified as height levels for the verification of horizontal wind speeds
100 m, 80 m, 60 m and 40 m. The cup anemometers at the three lower heights are boom-mounted, the anemometer
at 100 m is top-mounted with a cage – for protection but leading also to further distortion – around it. Wind vanes
for reference wind direction measurements are not mounted at the same height levels as the cup anemometers. For
comparisons with the lidar measurements and for filtering purposes, we have used the vanes at one level below – i.e.
90 m, 70 m, 50 m and 33 m.
The availability of the floating-lidar system during the period of the offshore trial was evaluated by deriving the
respective Key Performance Indicator (KPI) defined in [2]. The System Availability is defined in that context as the
fraction of time, the lidar system is ready to function according to the specifications and deliver data, taking into
account all time-stamped data entries in the output data files including flagged data. The value of the KPI is then the
number of those time-stamped data entries relative to the maximum possible number of 10-min data entries
including periods of maintenance (regarded as 100%) within the considered period. The numbers we obtain for our
nine-weeks trial are listed in Table 1.
Figure 2 shows the correlation between measured horizontal mean wind speeds from the floating-lidar device and
the reference cup anemometer at 100 m measurement height together with the results of a two-parameter linear
regression. Before applying the regression analysis, the data were filtered according to the following criteria:
A valid wind direction sector was defined by the wind directions between 280° and 350°, corresponding
to the directions where no wake effects affect the reference data;
Only (reference) horizontal mean wind speeds larger or equal 2 m/s were considered – as specified in
[2];
J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 (2014) 156 – 161 159
Lidar data availability for each 10-min interval, defined as the corresponding parameter output by the
Windcube lidar device, was required to be 100%.
Both the correlation plot and the regression results (see Figure 2) demonstrate a very good agreement of the
measured mean wind speeds – and therewith a very good performance of the tested floating-lidar device for this
measurement variable. The obtained coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.996 is well within the best-practice
acceptance criteria of 0.98 in [2].
In order to study the performance of the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy in its first offshore trial in more
detail, we performed different sensibility analyses. The plots in Figure 3 show both the deviation in measured
horizontal mean wind speeds and the deviations in recorded turbulence intensity (TI) values – defined as wind speed
standard deviation divided by mean wind speed – versus the simultaneously recorded significant wave height at the
location of the deployment. Deviations in mean speed between floating-lidar and reference cup anemometer
measurements show no significant dependence on the prevailing wave heights. For the TI values, on the contrary, a
clear trend is visible characterized by larger deviations or larger floating-lidar values compared to the reference,
respectively, with increasing wave heights.
Figure 3: Deviations in measured 10-min (left) mean wind speeds and (right) turbulence intensity (TI) values from floating lidar and reference
cup anemometer at 100 m measurement height versus simultaneously recorded (30-min-mean) significant wave height.
To eliminate this trend in the TI values and obtain usable data, a motion correction needs to be applied to the
recorded data. Figure 4 shows both uncorrected and corrected data (in red and blue, respectively) for the three
measurement variables mean wind speed, turbulence intensity and wind direction – again as the correlation with
respect to the reference data from the met. mast. For the correction of the floating-lidar data, the motion-correction
160 J. Gottschall et al. / Energy Procedia 53 (2014) 156 – 161
18 no correction
full correction 0.3
16
0.25
14
lidar wind speed [m/s]
12
lidar TI [-]
0.2
10
0.15
8
6 0.1
no correction
4
0.05 full correction
2
0
0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
reference TI [-]
reference wind speed [m/s]
350
250
no correction
bottom left.
200 full correction
150
100
50
0
280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350
reference wind direction [°]
4. Summary
The Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy has been introduced as a compact floating-lidar concept with an
encapsulated (well-protected) lidar device, a reliable power supply strategy, and an efficient (in-house developed)
motion-correction algorithm. Wind speed measurements, recorded in the first offshore trial of the system, show a
very good correlation with the reference data from the FINO1 met. mast. Wind direction and turbulence intensity
data require the application of a motion correction.
Further work on the Fraunhofer IWES Wind Lidar Buoy is in progress – a second offshore test with a modified
prototype is planned for the first half of 2014.
Acknowledgements
The project ‘Offshore Messboje’ was funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation
and Nuclear Safety / BMU, Germany (FKZ 032538).
References
[1] T. Rogers et al. Path toward Bankability of Floating Lidar Data. Proceedings of EWEA Offshore Event, Frankfurt, 2013.
[1a] G. Howe (presenter). AXYS WindSentinel™. Proceedings of EWEA Conference 2013 (published online), Vienna, 2013.
[1b] T. Kyriazis (presenter). Low cost and flexible offshore wind measurements using a floating lidar solution (FLIDAR™). Proceedings of
EWEA Conference 2013 (published online), Vienna, 2013.
[1c] J.-P. Mathisen. Measurement of wind profile with a buoy mounted lidar. Energy Procedia / Proceedings of DeepWind Conference 2013 – to
be published, 2013.
[2] G. Wolken-Möhlmann, B. Lange. Simulation of motion-induced measurement errors for wind measurements with LIDAR on floating
platforms. Proceedings of ISARS conference, Paris, 2010.
[3] Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator roadmap for the commercial acceptance of floating LIDAR technology, CTC819 Version 1.0, 21
November 2013 (http://www.carbontrust.com/media/422195/ctc819-owa-roadmap-commercial-acceptance-floating-lidar-technologies.pdf)
[4] IEC 61400-12-1 Ed.2 CD / IEC 61400-12-1: Wind turbines – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind
turbines, Committee Draft, June 2013