MKU Legal Research & Writing - Case Briefing
MKU Legal Research & Writing - Case Briefing
MKU Legal Research & Writing - Case Briefing
Identify the relevant facts, issues, holding, court reasoning and the legal rules set out in a case.
Prepare a case brief.
Content
8.1 Definition of a case brief
8.2 Functions of a case brief
8.3 Steps to briefing a case
Read first
Heading
Statement of facts
Procedural history
Issues
Holding
Reasoning
Judgment
Concurring/ Dissenting opinions
Analysis
Page | 1
8.1 Definition of a case brief
A case brief is a written summary of a case. It contains a written summary of the basic components
of that case. It represents a final product after reading a case, rereading it, taking it apart and
putting it back together again. A case brief is a tool intended for personal use.
Case briefing helps you acquire the skills of case analysis and legal reasoning.
As a learner, case briefs help you remember the cases you read:
for class discussion;
for end-of-semester review for final examinations; and
for writing and analyzing legal problems.
NB: most of the cases you will read are appellate cases as the decisions of lower courts have less
precedential value
Read first
Read the court decision first so you can understand the overall story and identify important facts
before beginning to brief the case on paper.
Heading
Statement of Facts
Identify legally relevant facts, that is, the facts that the court relied upon in resolving the case’s
legal issues. Legally relevant facts are those facts that tend to prove or disprove an issue before the
court. Those facts had an impact on the case’s outcome. The legally relevant facts tell what
happened before the parties entered the judicial system.
Procedural history
This is the disposition of the case in the lower court(s) that explains how the case got to the court
Page | 2
whose decision you are reading. It describes what events within the court system led to the present
case:
What are the big legal questions that the court is considering in this case?
What has to be resolved or answered?
Holding
The holding answers the question – how did the court resolve the issues? In other words, it
answers each question raised in the issues section.
Tip: first, state the answer in a word or two, such as "yes" or "no." Then in a sentence or two, state the legal principle
on which the court relied to reach that answer (the "holding").
Concurring/Dissenting Opinions
A judge who hears a case may not agree with the majority’s decision and will write a separate
dissenting opinion. Another judge may agree with the decision but not with the majority’s
reasoning and will write a separate concurring opinion.
Page | 3
Tip: note the concurring/dissenting judge(s)’ reasons for refusing to join in the majority opinion.
Analysis
What are your reactions to and critique of the opinion? Anything you like? Dislike?
How does this case fall in line with the other cases you have read?
Assess the reasoning in each case. Is it sound?
Is it contradictory? What are the political, economic or social impacts of this decision?
Recommended readings:
Yusuf Kiwanda, The Exodus of Law and Legal Methods (Law Africa Publishing Ltd Kenya 2016)
chapter 8
Page | 4