lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Project guidelines

Computer Science and Engineering (Anna University)

Scan to open on Studocu

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])
 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

AN N A U N I V E R S I T Y
PROGRE SS T HROUGH KNOW LEDGE

Project Guidelines (Under Graduate)

Department of C om puter Sc ience & En gineeri n g

http://cs.annauniv.edu

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Preamble

These guidelines are intended to give both students and faculty members at the Department of

Computer Science and Engineering a set of procedures and expectations that will make the

project evaluation process easier, more predictable, and more successful. These guidelines

should also be interpreted as the minimum requirements of the degree awarded by Anna
P RO JEC T G U I D EL I N ES U N D ER G RA D U A T E

University. The Project Committee assigned for various programmes offered under Department of

Computer Science & Engineering may add requirements or guidelines as they see fit – as long as

there are no less demanding than the guidelines set forth in this document.

Eligibility

The Eligibility criteria for the Under Graduate students are to be followed as per the regulations

given by Anna University during Admission. The total internal assessment marks shall be 50 there

shall be three assessments (each 100 marks) during the semester by a review committee. The

Head of the Department shall constitute the review committee. The student shall make

presentation on the progress made before the committee. The total marks obtained in the three

assessments shall be reduced to 45 marks and rounded to the nearest integer. The remaining 5

marks shall be distributed for attendance.

General Suggestions and Expectations

The project is by far the most important single piece of work in the degree programme. It provides

the opportunity for you to demonstrate independence and originality, to plan and organise a large

project over a long period, and to put into practice some of the techniques you have been taught

throughout the course. The students are advised to choose a project that involves a combination

of sound background research, a solid implementation, or piece of theoretical work, and a

thorough evaluation of the project's output in both absolute and relative terms. Interdisciplinary

project proposals and innovative projects are encouraged and more appreciable.

A good tip is to try to think of the project as deliverable at reviews, rather than an effort to deliver a

fully-functioning "product". The very best projects invariably cover some new ground, e.g. by

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

developing a complex application which does not already exist, or by enhancing some existing

application or method to improve its functionality, performance etc.

A straightforward implementation project is acceptable, but you must appreciate that it is unlikely

to gain high marks, regardless of how well it is done and its usage. Likewise, projects which are

predominantly survey reports, unless they are backed up with experimentation, implementation, or

A N N A U N I V E R SI T Y
theoretical analysis, e.g. for performing an objective comparison of surveyed methods, techniques

etc. Pure survey reports, with no supporting implementation or theory, are not acceptable.

 UG students are to decide on their team members for their final semester project with their

proposed title & project guide and to suggest it to the project committee with a brief

abstract during August of academic schedule.

D E P A R T M EN T O F C O M P U T ER SC I EN C E & EN G I N E ER I N G
 Project report / Thesis to be prepared as per the guidelines and format given by Anna

University.

 If the student fails to attend the review or the guide refuses to endorse the student’s work,

the committee can invite HOD. HOD is empowered to resolve any further matters.

 In case of re-reviews, any number of re-reviews can happen depending on the discretion of

the panel and it should happen within the prescribed time.

 HOD, can initiate further steps to ensure the smooth implementation as deems appropriate

of guidelines.

 If the work of the candidate is found to be insufficient and plagiarism, the committee & HOD

will decide the further process.

 Marks split-up
Committee - 30 Marks (Each 10 marks)
Guide - 20 Marks
Total - 50 Marks

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Choosing an Project

The idea for your project may be a proposal from a member of staff or your own, or perhaps a

combination of the two.

Staff Proposals
P RO JEC T G U I D EL I N ES U N D ER G RA D U A T E

For projects proposed by members of staff you should discuss the project with the proposer as

soon as possible so that you have plenty of time to think about the best choices for you. Note that

not every project is suitable for every student: some may be specifically tailored to a particular

degree and some may only suit students with a very specific set of interests. Each proposal will

indicate these constraints in order to help you to make an informed choice.

Own Proposals

If you have your own idea for an individual project it is your responsibility to find a member of staff

who both approves of the proposed programme of work and is willing to guide it. You should first

get the permission of Project Committee, and may proceed with the same with the consistent

consent of the guide.

Choosing the right project

The projects offered by staff may vary substantially in breadth, depth and degree of difficulty. The

most important thing is to shortlist a set of projects that are right for you. Some students are better

suited to well-defined and relatively safe projects that provide scope for demonstrating proficiency

with a low risk of failure. Other students are better advised to tackle harder, riskier projects that

require a high degree of original input and/or technical problem solving.

If you are in are hope to win one of the illustrious project prizes, or achieve "Distinguished Project"

status, you should choose your shortlist with particular care. The potential guides will be happy to

offer advice on the suitability of a project, given your individual background, strengths and

ambitions. Remember that it is important to balance ambition and realism when making a choice.

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

For better help of projects you can search from websites like (IEEE, ACM, Elsevier, Springer,

etc...)

Meeting Your Guide

You must make sure that you arrange regular meetings with your guide. The meetings may be

A N N A U N I V E R SI T Y
brief once your project is under way but your guide needs to know that your work is progressing. If

you need to talk to your guide between meetings and cannot locate them in their office, contact

him/her and asking him/her to suggest a time when they will be available. When you go to see

your guide (or second marker) you should have prepared a written list of points you wish to

discuss. Take notes during the meeting so that you do not forget the advice you were given or the

D E P A R T M EN T O F C O M P U T ER SC I EN C E & EN G I N E ER I N G
conclusions that were reached.

Guides

The Guides are advised to give projects and suggest project titles focussing more on the current

field of research and ensure the level of innovation. Also guides are advised to check for the

formatting of the presentation and project report. Staff member cannot guide more than two

projects in the academic schedule.

The Project Presentation and Demonstration

One of the most important skills which the project aims to assess is your ability to communicate

your ideas and work. As part of the assessment you will be required to give a presentation and

demonstration of your project to your Project Committee.

Each presentation will be for 10 minutes (to be decided by the project committee at the initial

stages and 20 for the final stages including a demonstration. Guides will help you to structure your

talk and will be willing to go through it with you beforehand. The presentation is also a compulsory

component of the project. The project committee will not allocate a mark for a project unless there

had been a formal presentation. The objective of the presentation is to find out exactly what you/

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

your team have done and to ensure that you get an accurate mark that is consistent with other

projects.

Schedule for Project Reviews

EVEN SEMESTER (December – April) – B.E

Review Tentative Date

P RO JEC T G U I D EL I N ES U N D ER G RA D U A T E

Zeroth Review Within 2 Weeks from the beginning of the semester

First Review Within 6 Weeks but within schedule of 1st Assessment

Second Review Within 12 Weeks but within schedule of 2nd Assessment

Third Review Within 18 Weeks but within schedule of 3rd Assessment

Viva voce End of April

The project committee is advised to conduct the project reviews for the students of various

programmes within the stipulated period and the review marks to be sent to the head of the

department at the month end. The project committee is also advised to make necessary

arrangements required (Seminar hall availability and Projector, etc...) for the smooth conduct of

reviews.

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Project Requirements: B.E (CSE) | Expectations from Students (in each Presentation)
Zeroth Review First Review Second Review Third Review

Title Title Title Tile

Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract
Introduction Architectural Design for Proposed System Detailed Design (if any deviation) Overall Design
Literature Survey ER Diagram, DFD, Use case diagram ( if necessary) Contribution of the candidate (if any) Experimental Results
Proposed System Algorithms / Techniques used with complexity Results obtained (intermediate) Performance Evaluation
Modules Split-up and Gantt Chart Expected outcomes References References
References References 80% of code Implementation Contribution of the Project
30% of code implementation 100% of code implementation – Demo

Approval Guidelines of Zeroth Review

 Comparison with the existing systems and Complexity Metric (FP, Etc...)
 Deliverables to be mentioned clearly for each review.
 Work distribution among team members. Evaluation based on the complexity of the work.

Note:
 The presentation should have maximum of 12 – 15 slides
 Presentation will be for 10 minutes
 System to be tested using testing software’s.
 All three reviews are compulsory.

Project Committee
 The committee is advised to find the enough complexity in the project.
 All the three panel members must be presented during the review.
 Reviews to be conducted in the seminar hall and the available class rooms(in the department)
Guides to check
 Advised to check for the formatting of the presentation and the documentation.
 Check for the attendance of the students (Regular meeting for the discussion).

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Department of Computer Science & Engineering Project Evaluation Form

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI – 600 025 B.E(CSE) – Review Zero

Project Title :

Project Team
S.No Register No Candidate Name Guided By

Team Members Contribution and Performance

Team Members
(Each category carries 5 points)

Subject Matter 1 2 3 4

Understanding background and topic

Specifies Project goals

Knowledge about the existing system

Summaries, algorithms and highlights the project features

Specifies the testing platforms and benchmark systems

Project Planning

Technical Design

Summaries the ultimate findings of the project

Question and Answer

Presentation skills

Total

Expe ctat io ns for Next Rev ie ws Comments

Rev ie w One

Rev ie w Two

Rev ie w Thre e

Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Guide

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Department of Computer Science & Engineering Project Evaluation Form

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI – 600 025 B.E(CSE) – Review One

Project Title :

Project Team
S.No Register No Candidate Name Guided By

Team Members Contribution and Performance

Team Members
(Each category carries 5 points)

Subject Matter 1 2 3 4

Understanding background and topic

Specifies Project goals

Knowledge about the existing system

Summaries, algorithms and highlights the project features

Technical Design

Summaries the ultimate findings of the project

Question and Answer

Presentation skills

Explanation of Code

Implementation (30 Percentage)

Total

Expe ctat io ns for Next Rev ie ws Comments

Rev ie w Two

Rev ie w Thre e

Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Guide

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Department of Computer Science & Engineering Project Evaluation Form

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI – 600 025 B.E(CSE) – Review Two

Project Title :

Project Team
S.No Register No Candidate Name Guided By

Team Members Contribution and Performance

Team Members
(Each category carries 5 points)

Subject Matter 1 2 3 4

Summaries, algorithms and highlights the project features

Detailed Design

Contribution of the candidate

Results (Intermediate)

Summaries the ultimate findings of the project

Question and Answer

Presentation skills

Explanation of Code

Implementation (80 Percentage)

Total

Expe ctat io ns for Next Rev ie ws Comments

Rev ie w Thre e

Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Guide

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

Department of Computer Science & Engineering Project Evaluation Form

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI – 600 025 B.E(CSE) – Review Three

Project Title :

Project Team
S.No Register No Candidate Name Guided By

Team Members Contribution and Performance

Team Members
(Each category carries 5 points)

Subject Matter 1 2 3 4

Abstract

Specific project goals

Summaries, algorithms and highlights the project features

Design & Performance Evaluation

Results

Summaries the ultimate findings of the project

Question and Answer

Presentation skills

Explanation of Code

Implementation (80 Percentage)

Total

Comments

Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Guide

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

T HE S I S T E M P L A T E

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

TITLE OF PROJECT REPORT

<Font Size 18><1.5 line spacing>

A PROJECT REPORT
<Font Size 14>

Submitted by
<Font Size 14><Italic>

NAME OF THE CANDIDATE(S)

<Font Size 16>

in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree

of
<Font Size 14><1.5 line spacing><Italic>

NAME OF THE DEGREE

<Font Size 16>

IN

BRANCH OF STUDY
<Font Size 14>

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI 600 025
<Font Size 16><1.5 line spacing>

MONTH & YEAR

<Font Size 14>

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

WEYEB: AN EYE-CONTROLLED WEB BROWSER BY

EYE TRACKING AND IMAGE WRAPPING

A PROJECT REPORT

Submitted by

K.SENTHILKUMAR
R.ARUNKUMAR

in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree

of

Bachelor of Engineering

in

Computer Science & Engineering

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI 600 025.

APRIL 2010

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

Certified that this project report titled “WEYEB: AN EYE-CONTROLLED WEB BROWSER
BY EYE TRACKING AND IMAGE WRAPPING”, is a bona fide work of
Mr. K.Senthilkumar (201035209), who carried out the work under my supervision, for the
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Engineering
in Computer Science & Engineering. Certified further that to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the work reported herein does not form part of any other thesis or dissertation on the
basis of which a degree or an award was conferred on an earlier occasion.

Place: Chennai. Dr.XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Designation,
Date: Dept. of Computer Science & Engg.
Anna University,
Chennai - 600 025.

COUNTERSIGNED

HEAD
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
Anna University, Chennai 600 025.

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

ABSTRACT (English) iv

ABSTRACT (Tamil) v

LIST OF TABLES viii

LIST OF FIGURES ix

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS x

1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 LITERATURE SURVEY 1

1.2 OVERVIEW 2

1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT 4

2 WORK DONE IN PHASE ONE 5

2.1 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DESIGN 5

2.2 FEATURE EXTRACTION 7

2.2.1 Gabor Filter 7

2.3 DEFECT CLASSIFICATION IN IMAGE DATA 9

2.3.1 Datasets 9

3 SYSTEM ORGANIZATION 11

3.1 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DESIGN 11

4 CLASSIFICATION & RETRIEVAL 15

4.1 INTRODUCTION 15

4.1.1 Texture Segmentation 16

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

4.1.2 Texture Classification 18

4.2 FEATURE EXTRACTION 18

4.2.1 Gabor Filter 18

4.2.1.1 Texture Representation 20

4.3 SIMILARITY MEASURES 20

4.3.1 Canberra Distance Metric 21

4.4 IMAGE RETRIEVAL 21

4.4.1 Feature DB creation and Image Retrieval 22

4.5 DEFECT DETECTION IN VIDEO 22

4.5.1 Sobel Edge Detector 22

5 IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS 24

5.1 IMPLEMENTATION 24

5.1.1 Algorithm for Gabor Filter 24

5.1.2 Algorithm for Canberra Distance Metrics 26

5.1.3 Algorithm for Retrieval 26

5.1.4 Algorithm for Image classification 27

5.1.5 Algorithm for Video Frame Extraction 27

5.1.6 Algorithm for Video Defect Detection 28

5.2 RESULTS 29

6 CONCLUSION & FUTURE WORK 37

PUBLICATION 38

REFERENCES 39

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

2.1 Type of Defect and their population from the

TILDA Database. 10

5.1 Classification accuracies for the TILDA Database 31

5.2 Canberra Distance between the query image and

Results 33

5.3 CPU Times and Feature Vector Length for Gabor

Features Computed in MATLAB 33

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

2.1 Architecture of the Defect Classification System 6

2.2 External Interface Diagram of the System 6

2.3 Image Database 10

3.1 Architecture for Image Defect Classification System 13

3.2 Architecture for Image Defect Retrieval System 13

3.3 Architecture for Video Defect Detection System 14

4.1 Detector masks for the Sobel Edge Detector 23

5.1 Query Image: Test12.bmp 29

5.2 Application window for Image Defect Classification

System with Input 30

5.3 Application window for Image Defect Classification

System with output 30

5.4 Query Image: T163.bmp 31

5.5 Application window for Image Defect Retrieval

System with Input 32

5.6 Retrieval Results of Image Defect Retrieval System 32

5.7 Application window for Video Defect Detection System 34

5.8 Input Video: Defect1.avi 34

5.9 Set of frames from Defect1.avi 35

5.10 Application window for the Video Defect Detection

System with output 36

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|37415528

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AVI Audio Video Interlace

BMP Bitmap

CPU Central Processing Unit

GB Giga Bytes

GUI Graphical User Interface

LDA Linear Discriminant Analysis

ML Machine Learning

PCA Principal Component Analysis

RAM Read Only Memory

SPCA Shift – invariant Principal Component Analysis

Downloaded by Jaison .. ([email protected])