Week 3
Week 3
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
HDL BMI
HDL 1 -0.1742971
BMI -0.1742971 1
r=-0.1742971
A higher BMI correlates with a lower HDL, according to the linear correlation coefficient.
There's a higher BMI and a lower HDL. When your BMI goes up, your HDL stays the same or
goes down. Some HDL is higher, but not much. The relationship between BMI and HDL may
not be linear, but curvilinear. To better understand the BMI-HDL relationship, we need to do a
more detailed analysis. I'd also include that it's a positive magnitude with the BMI being 1 and
negative with the number being -0.174297 HDL, based on the correlation on the linear graph.
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
0.3269618
Multiple R 8
0.1069040
R Square 7
Adjusted R 0.0890421
Square 5
12.723834
Standard Error 5
Observations 52
ANOVA
Significanc
df SS MS F eF
968.95176 0.0179876
Regression 1 968.951762 2 5.98502725 5
161.89596
Residual 50 8094.79824 5
Total 51 9063.75
Standard Low
Coefficients Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% 95.
72.042692 8.2994497 54.607559
Intercept 3 8.68041793 4 5.746E-11 8 89.4778249 54.607
BMI -0.7267729 0.29707468 -2.4464315 0.01798765 -1.3234649 -0.1300808 -1.323
y= 72.0426--0.7267x
the p value is small
The intercept coefficient is the slope under the y-intercept. Therefore, y = 72.0426-(-0.7267x)
with a p value of 0.0175. There is a significant linear relationship between x BMI and y HDL.
SSR, or sum of squared regression, is the amount of variation explained by the regression of
HDL on BMI. In this case, the sum of squared total, or SST, refers to the sum of SSR and SSE.
We have multiple R at the top. The correlation coefficient r can be taken from simple linear
regression. R= 0.3269